New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify npm package names #9471

Open
cajus opened this Issue Dec 18, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@cajus
Contributor

cajus commented Dec 18, 2017

Currently we have:

  • qooxdoo-sdk
  • qx-cli
  • qxcompiler

This doesn't feel very streamlined. Long version:

  • qooxdoo-sdk
  • qooxdoo-cli
  • qooxdoo-compiler

or short version

  • qx-sdk
  • qx-cli
  • qx-compiler

or something else?

Publishing it as qooxdoo-sdk when it becomes qx-sdk will not make sense. Except it's possible to remove these entries again.

@hkollmann

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@hkollmann

hkollmann Dec 18, 2017

Member

There already exists a qooxdoo-sdk on npm

Member

hkollmann commented Dec 18, 2017

There already exists a qooxdoo-sdk on npm

@level420

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@level420

level420 Dec 18, 2017

Member

We should go with

  • qx-sdk
  • qx-cli
  • qx-compiler

if possible

Member

level420 commented Dec 18, 2017

We should go with

  • qx-sdk
  • qx-cli
  • qx-compiler

if possible

@johnspackman

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@johnspackman

johnspackman Dec 18, 2017

Member

I quite like the longer qooxdoo-* versions, it's immediately recognisable and better for search engines.

Member

johnspackman commented Dec 18, 2017

I quite like the longer qooxdoo-* versions, it's immediately recognisable and better for search engines.

@derrell

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@derrell

derrell Dec 18, 2017

Member

I prefer the longer qooxdoo-* version. Whose is the existing qooxdoo-sdk that's in npm?

Member

derrell commented Dec 18, 2017

I prefer the longer qooxdoo-* version. Whose is the existing qooxdoo-sdk that's in npm?

@derrell

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@derrell

derrell Dec 18, 2017

Member

Uggh. I clicked on the fuel bars to bring up the voting, only to discover that where i clicked registered my vote. I do not want to vote for qx-*, i want to vote for qooxdoo-*

Member

derrell commented Dec 18, 2017

Uggh. I clicked on the fuel bars to bring up the voting, only to discover that where i clicked registered my vote. I do not want to vote for qx-*, i want to vote for qooxdoo-*

@johnspackman

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@johnspackman

johnspackman Dec 18, 2017

Member

qooxdoo-sdk is ours, now - the original author handed it over to us

Member

johnspackman commented Dec 18, 2017

qooxdoo-sdk is ours, now - the original author handed it over to us

@cajus

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cajus

cajus Dec 18, 2017

Contributor

Stupid poll. You can vote as often as you want :-(

Contributor

cajus commented Dec 18, 2017

Stupid poll. You can vote as often as you want :-(

@johnspackman

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@johnspackman

johnspackman Dec 18, 2017

Member
Member

johnspackman commented Dec 18, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment