From ab65c8b68ac7f63b2aa5fb4cfd64d7fb46354a01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: javier Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:34:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fixing benchmark versions --- documentation/why-questdb.md | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/documentation/why-questdb.md b/documentation/why-questdb.md index 2caf571ca..e9cccec71 100644 --- a/documentation/why-questdb.md +++ b/documentation/why-questdb.md @@ -10,9 +10,13 @@ import Screenshot from "@theme/Screenshot" This pages provides a brief overview on: -- [Top QuestDB features](#features) -- [Benefits of QuestDB](#benefits) -- [Where to next?](#next-up) +- [Top QuestDB features {#features}](#top-questdb-features-features) + - [Massive ingestion handling \& throughput](#massive-ingestion-handling--throughput) + - [High performance deduplication \& out-of-order indexing](#high-performance-deduplication--out-of-order-indexing) + - [Hardware efficiency](#hardware-efficiency) + - [SQL with time series extensions](#sql-with-time-series-extensions) +- [Benefits of QuestDB {#benefits}](#benefits-of-questdb-benefits) +- [Where to next? {#next-up}](#where-to-next-next-up) - [Support](#support)
@@ -76,7 +80,7 @@ QuestDB, on maximal hardware, significantly outperforms peers: alt="A chart showing high-cardinality ingestion performance of InfluxDB, TimescaleDB, and QuestDB" src="images/benchmark/benchmark_all_q1_2024.webp" width={650} - title="Benchmark results for QuestDB 7.3.10, InfluxDB 2.7.4 and Timescale 2.14.2" + title="Benchmark results for QuestDB 9.1.0, InfluxDB 2.7.12, ClickHouse 25.10.1.1486, and Timescale 2.22.1" /> However, on less robust hardware the difference is even more pronounced, as seen From 50120ec434937c3e163152993e770e93430a4c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: javier Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 19:20:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fixing benchmark versions --- documentation/why-questdb.md | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/documentation/why-questdb.md b/documentation/why-questdb.md index e9cccec71..d399770ba 100644 --- a/documentation/why-questdb.md +++ b/documentation/why-questdb.md @@ -10,13 +10,9 @@ import Screenshot from "@theme/Screenshot" This pages provides a brief overview on: -- [Top QuestDB features {#features}](#top-questdb-features-features) - - [Massive ingestion handling \& throughput](#massive-ingestion-handling--throughput) - - [High performance deduplication \& out-of-order indexing](#high-performance-deduplication--out-of-order-indexing) - - [Hardware efficiency](#hardware-efficiency) - - [SQL with time series extensions](#sql-with-time-series-extensions) -- [Benefits of QuestDB {#benefits}](#benefits-of-questdb-benefits) -- [Where to next? {#next-up}](#where-to-next-next-up) +- [Top QuestDB features](#features) +- [Benefits of QuestDB](#benefits) +- [Where to next?](#next-up) - [Support](#support)
@@ -80,7 +76,7 @@ QuestDB, on maximal hardware, significantly outperforms peers: alt="A chart showing high-cardinality ingestion performance of InfluxDB, TimescaleDB, and QuestDB" src="images/benchmark/benchmark_all_q1_2024.webp" width={650} - title="Benchmark results for QuestDB 9.1.0, InfluxDB 2.7.12, ClickHouse 25.10.1.1486, and Timescale 2.22.1" + title="Results for QuestDB 9.1.0, Timescale 2.22.1, InfluxDB 2.7.12, and Clickhouse 25.10.1.1486" /> However, on less robust hardware the difference is even more pronounced, as seen