Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

'Type to search' text gone from 1st pane #250

Closed
pjrobertson opened this issue Apr 25, 2011 · 4 comments
Closed

'Type to search' text gone from 1st pane #250

pjrobertson opened this issue Apr 25, 2011 · 4 comments
Assignees
@HenningJ
Labels
Visual
Milestone
ß60

Comments

@pjrobertson
Copy link
Member

I've just built and run a checkout of the source from Dec '09 and I see that in the 1st pane there's a 'Type to Search' line.

It's also in whichever pane has focus.

I'm assuming Etienne broke this when he tried to do localisation stuff. Mmmm breaking things :(
@HenningJ
Copy link
Contributor

You're right, it's an issue with the weird localization stuff going on. I've been looking into that and...it's a mess. I've been making some headway in understand that, but it's still off

@HenningJ
Copy link
Contributor

I fixed this with pull request #250

HenningJ added a commit to HenningJ/Quicksilver that referenced this issue May 1, 2011
@HenningJ
Fixes issue quicksilver#250. Use a default value when doing localizat…
24eb5a7 
…ion.
pjrobertson added a commit that referenced this issue May 4, 2011
@pjrobertson
Merge pull request #260 from HenningJ/moreLocalization.
cf7f329 
More localization & fixes issue #250
@ghost ghost assigned HenningJ May 4, 2011
@pjrobertson
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed by HenningJ in his localisations commits

@pjrobertson
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed by HenningJ

@HenningJ HenningJ mentioned this issue Nov 6, 2011
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@HenningJ HenningJ

Labels
Visual
Projects
None yet
Milestone
ß60
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pjrobertson @HenningJ