Watch all directories down to the 'depth' level #2649
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previously, if you have a Catalog entry with depth of 3, the file/folder watching would only work on the 'top' folder level and lower level folders wouldn't be watched. This change makes QS watch folders down to the 'depth' specified in the catalog entry's settings. Fixes #2509
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, if you have a Catalog entry with depth of 3, the file/folder watching would only work on the 'top' folder level and lower level folders wouldn't be watched. This change makes QS watch folders down to the 'depth' specified in the catalog entry's settings. Fixes #2509
watch-subdirs.mov
Caveat: if you're to create a new sub-folder while QS is running, it won't add that to the watch list. QS will either need to be re-started, or the catalog entry toggled on/off. But I think that's a fairly small edge case.