Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decouple QUIC version and ALPN #12

Closed
martinthomson opened this issue Nov 23, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Decouple QUIC version and ALPN #12

martinthomson opened this issue Nov 23, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
-tls design has-consensus

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

@martinthomson martinthomson commented Nov 23, 2016

As per discussion at the meeting. This will allow QUIC to evolve ahead of any updates to its higher layers.

@martinthomson martinthomson added design -tls labels Nov 23, 2016
@MikeBishop MikeBishop added the proposal-ready label Jan 12, 2017
@MikeBishop
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeBishop MikeBishop commented Jan 12, 2017

This is decoupled per the changes in #122 (which are mired in a separate discussion). Whether #122 gets merged before -01 snaps or not, let's confirm that this issue is resolved acceptably at the interim.

In -00, the text was this:

The ALPN identifier for the protocol MUST be specific to the QUIC version that it operates over.

The text in #122 currently says:

The application-layer protocol MAY restrict the QUIC versions that it can operate over. Servers MUST select an application protocol compatible with the QUIC version that the client has selected.

@mnot
Copy link
Member

@mnot mnot commented Jan 25, 2017

Discussed in Tokyo; same as #97, now a dup.

@mnot mnot closed this Jan 25, 2017
@mnot mnot removed the proposal-ready label Jan 25, 2017
@mnot mnot added the has-consensus label Apr 19, 2017
siyengar pushed a commit to siyengar/base-drafts that referenced this issue May 17, 2018
martinthomson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2019
Align with master 2019/06/04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-tls design has-consensus
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants