Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Finding frame lengths #62

Closed
martinthomson opened this issue Dec 1, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Finding frame lengths #62

martinthomson opened this issue Dec 1, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
@martinthomson
Labels
-transport design has-consensus

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

@martinthomson martinthomson commented Dec 1, 2016

Martin Duke requests that all fields necessary for frame length computation be moved to the start of the frame.
@martinthomson martinthomson added design -transport labels Dec 1, 2016
@martinthomson martinthomson mentioned this issue Jan 25, 2017
Closed
@mnot
Copy link
Member

@mnot mnot commented Jan 26, 2017

As discussed in Tokyo, editors to propose a resolution for ACKs and STREAM frames.

@mnot mnot mentioned this issue Jan 26, 2017
Closed
@martinthomson martinthomson mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2017
Merged
@martinthomson martinthomson self-assigned this Feb 9, 2017
@RyanTheOptimist
Copy link
Contributor

@RyanTheOptimist RyanTheOptimist commented Feb 9, 2017

I confess to not quite having yet become zen with the process here. Is this ready for a consensus email to the list?

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member Author

@martinthomson martinthomson commented Feb 9, 2017

I believe that the decision was that the editors would be given discretion, based on the above. If @janaiyengar is ok with my proposal, we're basically done. If you disagree with anything, please let us know.

@RyanTheOptimist
Copy link
Contributor

@RyanTheOptimist RyanTheOptimist commented Feb 10, 2017

I'm sure I'm just confused about how the process is expected to work. This is not terribly surprising :)

Do I understand you correctly that since this issue was discussed in Tokyo, no consensus from the list is needed? I'm sorry for being dense.

@mnot mnot removed the editor-ready label Mar 7, 2017
@mnot mnot added the has-consensus label Apr 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@martinthomson martinthomson

Labels
-transport design has-consensus
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@martinthomson @mnot @RyanTheOptimist