From e192896da4f59e15cbb8a3676b67a9a5747574e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ianswett Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 18:13:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Remove obsolete 'Discussion' section The recommendation for a 25ms delayed ack time is in transport, not recovery, so remove it from recovery. Should this paragraph be moved to transport? Fixes #3075 --- draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md b/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md index a90cad46ad..15780e9c7c 100644 --- a/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md +++ b/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md @@ -608,16 +608,6 @@ be acknowledged or declared lost. Initial secrets however might be destroyed sooner, as soon as handshake keys are available (see Section 4.9.1 of {{QUIC-TLS}}). -## Discussion - -The majority of constants were derived from best common practices among widely -deployed TCP implementations on the internet. Exceptions follow. - -A shorter delayed ack time of 25ms was chosen because longer delayed acks can -delay loss recovery and for the small number of connections where less than -packet per 25ms is delivered, acking every packet is beneficial to congestion -control and loss recovery. - # Congestion Control {#congestion-control} QUIC's congestion control is based on TCP NewReno {{?RFC6582}}. NewReno is a