From c52cd498bfa49a005f25bcd11ad11a043c322d08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ianswett Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 22:36:52 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ECN editorial From Gorry's comments --- draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md b/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md index acf0f4deab..041902044c 100644 --- a/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md +++ b/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md @@ -826,9 +826,9 @@ sender. Suppressing reports of ECN-CE markings could cause a sender to increase their send rate. This increase could result in congestion and loss. A sender MAY attempt to detect suppression of reports by marking occasional -packets that they send with ECN-CE. If a packet marked with ECN-CE is not -reported as having been marked when the packet is acknowledged, the sender -SHOULD then disable ECN for that path. +packets that they send with ECN-CE. If a packet sent with ECN-CE is not +reported as having been CE marked when the packet is acknowledged, then the +sender SHOULD disable ECN for that path. Reporting additional ECN-CE markings will cause a sender to reduce their sending rate, which is similar in effect to advertising reduced connection flow control