From b634af8db87a6e94943d5ceb73c9995397ed9583 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Thomson Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:57:40 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Not all registries have stricter rules Closes #4385. --- draft-ietf-quic-transport.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/draft-ietf-quic-transport.md b/draft-ietf-quic-transport.md index 73bb26813a..f2aa76696d 100644 --- a/draft-ietf-quic-transport.md +++ b/draft-ietf-quic-transport.md @@ -7328,12 +7328,12 @@ permanent registrations. The creation of a registry MAY identify a range of codepoints where registrations are governed by a different registration policy. For instance, -the registries for 62-bit codepoints in this document have stricter policies for -codepoints in the range from 0 to 63. +the frame type registry in {{iana-frames}} has a stricter policy for codepoints +in the range from 0 to 63. Any stricter requirements for permanent registrations do not prevent provisional registrations for affected codepoints. For instance, a provisional registration -for a frame type ({{iana-frames}}) of 61 could be requested. +for a frame type of 61 could be requested. All registrations made by Standards Track publications MUST be permanent.