Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dbVersion(con) generic? #31

Closed
hadley opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

dbVersion(con) generic? #31

hadley opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@hadley
Copy link
Member

hadley commented Jan 9, 2019

Should we have a standard way of getting the server database version?

@krlmlr
Copy link
Member

krlmlr commented Jan 16, 2019

We had this in dbGetInfo(), this is somewhat in a limbo state. For what other parts of that information should we provide generics? Perhaps we can also standardize what dbGetInfo() returns?

@krlmlr
Copy link
Member

krlmlr commented Dec 14, 2019

Please use dbGetInfo() to retrieve the relevant information.

@github-actions
Copy link

This old thread has been automatically locked. If you think you have found something related to this, please open a new issue and link to this old issue if necessary.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 14, 2020
@r-dbi r-dbi unlocked this conversation Nov 1, 2021
@krlmlr krlmlr transferred this issue from r-dbi/DBI Nov 1, 2021
@krlmlr krlmlr reopened this Nov 1, 2021
@krlmlr
Copy link
Member

krlmlr commented Apr 14, 2024

The presence of a db.version component is specified and tested by DBItest. I think dbGetInfo(con)$db.version is as good as this gets.

@krlmlr krlmlr closed this as completed Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants