You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, only the Protocols present in UEFI spec seem to be defined in this crate. However, there are some valuable protocols like EFI_MP_SERVICE_PROTOCOL that are present in PI spec and, as far as I know, are available in the Dxe phase as well. So is it acceptable to add those to this crate, or should there be a separate crate for PI spec stuff?
There is also the UEFI shell spec which also contains protocols that can be pretty useful when writing shell applications, so I was wondering where they should go as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think all of the UEFI specs are fine to be integrated into r-efi. There are some uefi-forum specs like ACPI which probably should go into a separate module, as they are useful outside of UEFI environments. But other than that, I am fine incorporating this into r-efi.
Currently, only the Protocols present in UEFI spec seem to be defined in this crate. However, there are some valuable protocols like
EFI_MP_SERVICE_PROTOCOLthat are present in PI spec and, as far as I know, are available in the Dxe phase as well. So is it acceptable to add those to this crate, or should there be a separate crate for PI spec stuff?There is also the UEFI shell spec which also contains protocols that can be pretty useful when writing shell applications, so I was wondering where they should go as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: