You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is stricter, and basically just offers 4 formats (plus optional fractional seconds)
%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ
%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%SZ # replace T with space
%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S+00:00 # replace Z with offset from UTC
%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S+00:00 # replace T with space
It nicely doesn't allow for local time in any way, so we can safely return UTC time stamps.
From my understanding in reading the RFC, the only optional part is fractional seconds, so we don't need to try and support a ton of formats that we have to guess through, which I really like
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is basically an even saner ISO 8601
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3339#page-4
It is stricter, and basically just offers 4 formats (plus optional fractional seconds)
So we can do:
It nicely doesn't allow for local time in any way, so we can safely return UTC time stamps.
From my understanding in reading the RFC, the only optional part is fractional seconds, so we don't need to try and support a ton of formats that we have to guess through, which I really like
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: