New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
devtools' reference output for examples #1655
Comments
This behavior is likely changed in devel devtools, which uses the rcmdcheck package to run |
Yes, still present. Raised an issue for |
So, this is actually a devtools issue, because devtools always uses Line 169 in dbac1fa
|
Seems like we should hoist the "--timings" to the default for |
Yeah, that's good, too. |
Ok if you check with |
And you also need |
So it can be turned off if desired Fixes r-lib#1655
This old issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with reprex) and link to this issue. https://reprex.tidyverse.org/ |
So it can be turned off if desired Fixes r-lib#1655
When I was about to use the examples' output (examples from .Rd files) as a reference output, I noticed that the reference output produced by devtools is different to what a plain
R CMD check
produces. Notably, the filepkg_name-Ex.Rout
(to be stored at/tests/Examples/pkg_name-Ex.Rout.save
) contains a bunch of line like these which are not in the same file generated byR CMD check
:Consequently when the file generated by devtool's check is used as reference output, a lot of differences are found.
I use devtools 1.13.4 (2017-11-09 CRAN (R 3.4.2)).
Here are some examples from the wild:
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang/VeryLargeIntegers-00check.html
https://github.com/igraph/rigraph_revdep_checks/blob/master/revdep_logs/BDgraph/BDgraph-Ex.Rout
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: