Skip to content

Add GHA workflow to check for link rot #1077

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

Conversation

IndrajeetPatil
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1077 (55d3972) into main (d137eb6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1077   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.06%   91.06%           
=======================================
  Files          46       46           
  Lines        2685     2685           
=======================================
  Hits         2445     2445           
  Misses        240      240           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@lorenzwalthert
Copy link
Collaborator

Perfect, thank you. 🎉

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2022

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if d137eb6 is merged into main:

  •   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_applying: 25.9ms -> 25.9ms [-0.28%, +0.67%]
  •   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_recording: 790ms -> 791ms [-0.35%, +0.66%]
  •   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 1.97s -> 1.98s [-0.35%, +0.54%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

@IndrajeetPatil IndrajeetPatil merged commit 3a72387 into main Dec 6, 2022
@IndrajeetPatil IndrajeetPatil deleted the add_check_link_rot branch December 6, 2022 13:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants