Bump benchmark config

[lorenzwalthert]

@IndrajeetPatil Seems like try_fetch() got a lot faster recently. When I made a benchmark run, it was much faster than with_handlers():

library(rlang)
bench::mark(
  rlang::with_handlers({}, error = function(...) NULL),
  rlang::try_fetch({}, error = function(...) NULL),
)
#> Warning: `with_handlers()` is deprecated as of rlang 1.0.0.
#> ℹ Please use `tryCatch()`, `withCallingHandlers()`, or `try_fetch()`.
#> This warning is displayed once every 8 hours.
#> # A tibble: 2 × 6
#>   expression                                                 min  median itr/s…¹
#>   <bch:expr>                                            <bch:tm> <bch:t>   <dbl>
#> 1 rlang::with_handlers({ }, error = function(...) NULL)   6.37ms  6.47ms    152.
#> 2 rlang::try_fetch({ }, error = function(...) NULL)      10.75µs 11.62µs  84532.
#> # … with 2 more variables: mem_alloc <bch:byt>, `gc/sec` <dbl>, and abbreviated
#> #   variable name ¹​`itr/sec`

^{Created on 2023-04-04 with reprex v2.0.2}

I am bumping the benchmarking deps here, let's see what they bring and then, you can rebase #1103 on main to see if the problem persists.

[github-actions]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 57bbf4e is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_applying: 88.9ms -> 88ms [-6.77%, +4.73%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_recording: 1.23s -> 1.26s [-2.46%, +6.13%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 3.03s -> 3.01s [-4.99%, +3.3%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[IndrajeetPatil]

Why are all the workflows failing?! I can't seem to see the entirety of the logs, which is probably a bug in GHA UI.

[lorenzwalthert]

Why are all the workflows failing?

Because of the testthat warnings due to the deprecated with_handlers()?