Include sticker on the website

[IndrajeetPatil]

And other minor improvements to README.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (17f91fc) 92.16% compared to head (4e64881) 92.16%.

❗ Current head 4e64881 differs from pull request most recent head 96b469b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 96b469b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1173   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.16%   92.16%           
=======================================
  Files          46       46           
  Lines        2655     2655           
=======================================
  Hits         2447     2447           
  Misses        208      208           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 17f91fc is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_applying: 166ms -> 165ms [-3.45%, +2.25%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_recording: 551ms -> 551ms [-1.83%, +1.74%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 1.04s -> 1.04s [-1.26%, +1.16%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[lorenzwalthert]

Thanks. I think {styler} should not be in code font, as that style was derived from help files.

[github-actions]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 17f91fc is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_applying: 169ms -> 170ms [-1.33%, +3.19%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_recording: 549ms -> 548ms [-1.05%, +0.92%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 1.03s -> 1.02s [-1.05%, +0.32%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.