Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Google Structured Data validation #130

Closed
raamdev opened this issue Aug 11, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Improve Google Structured Data validation #130

raamdev opened this issue Aug 11, 2014 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@raamdev
Copy link
Owner

@raamdev raamdev commented Aug 11, 2014

A user reports that the theme is throwing a few validation errors when testing with the Google Structured Data Testing Tool. This should be looked into.

@abinashmohanty
Copy link

@abinashmohanty abinashmohanty commented Aug 18, 2014

Hi Raamdev, did you get a chance to look at the issue yet! Thanks

@raamdev
Copy link
Owner Author

@raamdev raamdev commented Aug 18, 2014

@abinashmohanty No, not yet. I'll update here when I work on it.

I work on this project in my spare time, so the amount of time I can commit to it varies.

@raamdev
Copy link
Owner Author

@raamdev raamdev commented Aug 22, 2014

Whoops, accidentally closed this issue by using the wrong issue number in a comment (meant to use issue #103).

@raamdev raamdev reopened this Aug 22, 2014
@raamdev raamdev added this to the Next Release milestone Sep 2, 2014
@raamdev
Copy link
Owner Author

@raamdev raamdev commented Nov 2, 2015

I just re-tested this and it looks like the Google Structured Data validation tool no longer reports any problems:

2015-11-02_12-55-09

I'm marking this as wontfix and closing.

@raamdev raamdev closed this Nov 2, 2015
@raamdev raamdev removed this from the Next Release milestone Nov 2, 2015
@abinashmohanty
Copy link

@abinashmohanty abinashmohanty commented Nov 2, 2015

Thanks for the hard work :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants