Permalink
Browse files

Add check-match to rackunit

check.rkt:
  Added the actual check-match macro.

test.rkt:
  Just a provide statement

check-test.rkt:
  7 additional tests for check-match, and a macro to help create tests

check.scrbl:
  Documentation and examples for check-match
  • Loading branch information...
1 parent 31f7cfb commit e264e4148884f0675bd21e889525ccb7239eb4b4 @jpolitz jpolitz committed with takikawa Nov 20, 2012
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#lang racket/base
-(require (for-syntax racket/base
+(require racket/match
+ (for-syntax racket/base
"location.rkt")
"base.rkt"
"check-info.rkt"
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@
check-not-eq?
check-not-eqv?
check-not-equal?
+ check-match
fail)
;; default-check-handler : any -> any
@@ -274,3 +276,28 @@
(define-simple-check (fail)
#f)
+;; NOTE(jpolitz): This match form isn't eager like the others, hence the
+;; define-syntax and the need to carry around location information
+(define-syntax (check-match stx)
+ (syntax-case stx ()
+ [(_ actual expected pred)
+ (quasisyntax
+ (let ([actual-val actual])
+ (with-check-info*
+ (list (make-check-name 'check-match)
+ (make-check-location
+ (list '(unsyntax (syntax-source stx))
+ '(unsyntax (syntax-line stx))
+ '(unsyntax (syntax-column stx))
+ '(unsyntax (syntax-position stx))
+ '(unsyntax (syntax-span stx))))
+ (make-check-expression '#,(syntax->datum stx))
+ (make-check-actual actual-val)
+ (make-check-expected 'expected))
+ (lambda ()
+ (check-true (match actual-val
+ [expected pred]
+ [_ #f]))))))]
+ [(_ actual expected)
+ (syntax/loc stx (check-match actual expected #t))]))
+
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
check-not-eqv?
check-not-equal?
check-regexp-match
+ check-match
fail)
(define (void-thunk) (void))
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ information detailing the failure.
Although checks are implemented as macros, which is
necessary to grab source location, they are conceptually
-functions. This means, for instance, checks always evaluate
+functions (with the exception of @racket[check-match] below).
+This means, for instance, checks always evaluate
their arguments. You can use checks as first class
functions, though you will lose precision in the reported
source locations if you do so.
@@ -180,6 +181,47 @@ The following check fails:
]
}
+@defform*[((check-match v pattern)
+ (check-match v pattern pred))]{
+
+A check that pattern matches on the test value. Matches the test value
+@racket[v] against @racket[pattern] as a @racket[match] clause. If no
+@racket[pred] is provided, then if the match succeeds, the entire check
+succeeds. For example, this use succeeds:
+
+@interaction[#:eval rackunit-eval
+ (check-match (list 1 2 3) (list _ _ 3))
+]
+
+This check fails to match:
+
+@interaction[#:eval rackunit-eval
+ (check-match (list 1 2 3) (list _ _ 4))
+]
+
+If @racket[pred] is provided, it is evaluated with the bindings from the
+match pattern. If it produces @racket[#t], the entire check succeeds,
+otherwise it fails. For example, this use succeeds, binding @racket[x]
+in the predicate:
+
+@interaction[#:eval rackunit-eval
+ (check-match (list 1 (list 3)) (list x (list _)) (odd? x))
+]
+
+This check fails because the @racket[pred] fails:
+
+@interaction[#:eval rackunit-eval
+ (check-match 6 x (odd? x))
+]
+
+This check fails because of a failure to match:
+
+@interaction[#:eval rackunit-eval
+ (check-match (list 1 2) (list x) (odd? x))
+]
+
+}
+
@defproc[(check (op (-> any any any))
(v1 any)
@@ -44,6 +44,18 @@
(lambda ()
(apply pred args)))))
+;; NOTE(jpolitz): Not generalizing make-failure-test above because (at
+;; least) util-test expects it to be present, not exported, and a
+;; 2-argument procedure to test require/expose
+(define-syntax make-failure-test/stx
+ (syntax-rules ()
+ [(_ name pred arg ...)
+ (test-case
+ name
+ (check-exn exn:test:check?
+ (lambda ()
+ (pred arg ...))))]))
+
(define-check (good)
#t)
@@ -92,6 +104,28 @@
(define-simple-check (check-symbol? x)
(symbol? x))
(for-each check-symbol? '(a b c))))
+
+ (test-case "Trivial check-match test"
+ (check-match "dirigible" _))
+
+ (test-case "Simple check-match test"
+ (check-match (list 1 2 3) (list _ _ 3)))
+
+ (test-case "check-match with a nested struct"
+ (let ()
+ (struct data (f1 f2 f3))
+ (check-match (data 1 2 (data 1 2 3))
+ (data _ 2 (data _ _ _)))))
+
+ (test-case "Simple check-match test with a binding pred"
+ (check-match 3 x (odd? x)))
+
+ (test-case "check-match with a nested struct and a binding pred"
+ (let ()
+ (struct data (f1 f2 f3))
+ (check-match (data 1 2 (data 1 2 3))
+ (data _ _ (data x y z))
+ (equal? (+ x y z) 6))))
;; Failures
(make-failure-test "check-equal? failure"
@@ -122,6 +156,12 @@
check-not-false #f)
(make-failure-test "check-= failure"
check-= 1.0 2.0 0.0)
+
+ (make-failure-test/stx "check-match failure pred"
+ check-match 5 x (even? x))
+
+ (make-failure-test/stx "check-match failure match"
+ check-match (list 4 5) (list _))
(test-case "check-= allows differences within epsilon"
(check-= 1.0 1.09 1.1))

0 comments on commit e264e41

Please sign in to comment.