Closes bug all/13969
struct-copy uses struct-info to determine field accessors rather than…
… break hygiene.
The way I match field name with accessor identifier feels a bit heavy-handed, but I don't know a better way to do it. Review?
This seems like an improvement on the current awfulness of struct-copy, although it isn't a full solution. @mflatt, any thoughts?
@mflatt any thoughts on this?
@ianj is this ready to merge? Did you look at checked-struct-info?
Does that mean you don't think we should merge this?
Ok, I closed this.