Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move current z80 plugin to extras #3287

Closed
radare opened this issue Sep 14, 2015 · 16 comments
Closed

Move current z80 plugin to extras #3287

radare opened this issue Sep 14, 2015 · 16 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@radare
Copy link
Collaborator

radare commented Sep 14, 2015

We have z80.cr plugin which is LGPL instead of NC-GPL, and its cleaner.

@jvoisin
Copy link
Contributor

jvoisin commented Sep 15, 2015

What about removing the current z80 plugin instead? Its code is awful suboptimal, its license is non LGPL, and comments are in German.

Also, the other one is working, we don't need two disassemblers.

@radare
Copy link
Collaborator Author

radare commented Sep 16, 2015

Why remove if it works and can be moved to extras? There are tons of tests written for it.. We should put some tests for extras at some point.

Im aware of the gpl thing and the code quality. But i dont like to see code die if its ok.

On 16 Sep 2015, at 00:46, jvoisin notifications@github.com wrote:

What about removing the current z80 plugin instead? Its code is awful suboptimal, its license is non LGPL, and comments are in German.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@radare
Copy link
Collaborator Author

radare commented Sep 16, 2015

@condret are u ok with this?

@jvoisin
Copy link
Contributor

jvoisin commented Sep 24, 2015

I think that he said ok to remove the current (and awful) z80 one on IRC

@radare
Copy link
Collaborator Author

radare commented Sep 25, 2015

Ok. Will purge today

On 25 Sep 2015, at 01:53, jvoisin notifications@github.com wrote:

I think that he said ok to remove the current (and awful) z80 one on IRC


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@Maijin
Copy link
Contributor

Maijin commented Sep 27, 2015

Related z80-cr issues:

#2119
#2075

@radare
Copy link
Collaborator Author

radare commented Sep 28, 2015

Regressions should be updated too

@Maijin
Copy link
Contributor

Maijin commented Sep 29, 2015

Regressions are already z80 and not z80-cr

@radare
Copy link
Collaborator Author

radare commented Sep 29, 2015

Z80 is the plug that must be killed. So all those tests will presumabily fail

On 29 Sep 2015, at 19:29, Maijin notifications@github.com wrote:

Regressions are already z80 and not z80-cr


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@Maijin
Copy link
Contributor

Maijin commented Sep 29, 2015

Ok

@Maijin
Copy link
Contributor

Maijin commented Sep 29, 2015

I remember @condret said he will generate the test for z80.cr just like he did for z80

@radare
Copy link
Collaborator Author

radare commented Oct 3, 2015

ok, so let’s wait for condret to do this

On 29 Sep 2015, at 21:46, Maijin notifications@github.com wrote:

I remember @condret https://github.com/condret said he will generate the test for z80.cr just like he did for z80


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #3287 (comment).

@radare radare modified the milestones: 1.0.0, 0.10.0 Oct 8, 2015
@radare
Copy link
Collaborator Author

radare commented Oct 8, 2015

move it to 1.0, we should do a major plugin re-organization after the release. to make the core smaller and handier

@Maijin
Copy link
Contributor

Maijin commented Oct 8, 2015

@radare r2pm for the win :D

@radare
Copy link
Collaborator Author

radare commented Nov 20, 2015

@condret can you post some tests for the z80.cr transition? so we can safely move the old plugin to extras?

@crowell
Copy link
Collaborator

crowell commented Jun 1, 2016

This issue was moved to radareorg/radare2-pm#3

@crowell crowell closed this as completed Jun 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants