diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
index d5e071f..0659108 100644
--- a/pom.xml
+++ b/pom.xml
@@ -1,96 +1,224 @@
-
-
- 4.0.0
-
- org.springframework.boot
- spring-boot-starter-parent
- 3.0.6
-
-
- com.medeiros
- SPRINGProject
- 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
- SPRINGProject
- Demo project for Spring Boot
-
- 20
-
- 6.0.3
-
-
-
- org.springframework.boot
- spring-boot-starter-data-jpa
-
-
- org.springframework.boot
- spring-boot-starter-web
-
-
-
- org.springframework.boot
- spring-boot-devtools
- runtime
- true
-
-
- com.mysql
- mysql-connector-j
- runtime
-
-
- org.springframework.boot
- spring-boot-starter-test
- test
-
-
-
- org.springframework.boot
- spring-boot-starter-thymeleaf
- 3.0.6
-
-
-
- org.springframework.boot
- spring-boot-starter-security
-
-
-
- io.jsonwebtoken
- jjwt-api
- 0.11.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
- org.springframework.security
- spring-security-core
- 6.0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
- io.jsonwebtoken
- jjwt-impl
- 0.11.5
- runtime
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- org.springframework.boot
- spring-boot-maven-plugin
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+ 4.0.0
+
+ org.springframework.boot
+ spring-boot-starter-parent
+ 3.0.6
+
+
+
+ com.medeiros
+ SPRINGProject
+ 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
+ SPRINGProject
+ Demo project for Spring Boot
+
+ 20
+
+ 6.0.3
+
+
+
+ org.springframework.boot
+ spring-boot-starter-data-jpa
+
+
+ org.springframework.boot
+ spring-boot-starter-web
+
+
+ org.springframework.boot
+ spring-boot-devtools
+ runtime
+ true
+
+
+ com.mysql
+ mysql-connector-j
+ runtime
+
+
+ org.springframework.boot
+ spring-boot-starter-test
+ test
+
+
+ org.springframework.boot
+ spring-boot-starter-thymeleaf
+ 3.0.6
+
+
+ org.springframework.boot
+ spring-boot-starter-security
+
+
+ org.mockito
+ mockito-junit-jupiter
+ 2.23.4
+
+
+
+ io.spring.javaformat
+ spring-javaformat-formatter
+ 0.0.40
+
+
+
+ org.junit.jupiter
+ junit-jupiter-api
+ 5.9.3
+ compile
+
+
+
+ org.mockito
+ mockito-core
+ 3.12.4
+ compile
+
+
+
+ org.junit.platform
+ junit-platform-engine
+ 1.9.3
+ compile
+
+
+
+ org.junit.platform
+ junit-platform-commons
+ 1.9.3
+ compile
+
+
+
+
+ io.jsonwebtoken
+ jjwt-api
+ 0.11.5
+
+
+
+ org.springframework.security
+ spring-security-core
+ 6.0.3
+
+
+
+
+ io.jsonwebtoken
+ jjwt-impl
+ 0.11.5
+ runtime
+
+
+
+
+
+ org.springframework.boot
+ spring-boot-maven-plugin
+
+
+ org.jacoco
+ jacoco-maven-plugin
+ 0.8.11
+
+
+
+ prepare-agent
+
+
+
+ report
+ test
+
+ report
+
+
+ coverageReport
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ org.apache.maven.plugins
+ maven-surefire-plugin
+ 3.2.5
+
+
+
+ org.apache.maven.plugins
+ maven-surefire-report-plugin
+ 3.2.5
+
+ testReport
+
+
+
+
+ org.apache.maven.plugins
+ maven-site-plugin
+ 2.1
+
+ testReport
+
+
+
+
+ io.spring.javaformat
+ spring-javaformat-maven-plugin
+ 0.0.40
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ org.mockito
+ mockito-junit-jupiter
+ 2.23.4
+
+
+
+ io.spring.javaformat
+ spring-javaformat-formatter
+ 0.0.40
+
+
+
+ org.junit.jupiter
+ junit-jupiter-api
+ 5.9.3
+ compile
+
+
+
+ org.mockito
+ mockito-core
+ 3.12.4
+ compile
+
+
+
+ org.junit.platform
+ junit-platform-engine
+ 1.9.3
+ compile
+
+
+
+ org.junit.platform
+ junit-platform-commons
+ 1.9.3
+ compile
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmBlenderAlgorithmCalcTest.java b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmBlenderAlgorithmCalcTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5c73c0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmBlenderAlgorithmCalcTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+/*
+Test generated by RoostGPT for test Rahul-jav-test-15 using AI Type Open AI and AI Model gpt-4o
+
+ROOST_METHOD_HASH=algorithmCalc_e489e5c1fc
+ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=algorithmCalc_009085eae1
+
+Scenario 1: Calculate Rithm Points for Valid List of MusicModel
+
+Details:
+ TestName: calculateRithmPointsForValidMusicList
+ Description: This test verifies that the algorithmCalc method correctly calculates the rithm points for a valid list of MusicModel objects. The focus is on ensuring that the combination of likes and comments points is accurately computed and stored in the resulting map.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create a list of MusicModel objects with predefined numbers of likes and comments. Mock the methods rithmPointsByLike and rithmPointsByComents to return predictable point values.
+ Act: Call the algorithmCalc method by passing the list of MusicModel objects.
+ Assert: Use assertions to check whether the returned map contains the correct calculated rithm points for each MusicModel name.
+
+Validation:
+ The assertion confirms that the method correctly calculates and accumulates points from likes and comments, reflecting accurate application behavior for typical use cases.
+
+Scenario 2: Calculate Rithm Points with Zero Likes and Comments
+
+Details:
+ TestName: calculateRithmPointsWithZeroInteractions
+ Description: This test checks if the algorithmCalc method handles MusicModel objects with zero likes and comments properly. It's crucial to ensure the method still functions without any errors and returns valid entries.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Construct a list of MusicModel objects with zero likes and comments. Mock dependency methods to return zero points for both likes and comments.
+ Act: Invoke algorithmCalc with this list.
+ Assert: Verify that the resultant map holds entries with zero rithm points for each music name.
+
+Validation:
+ Ensures that the method processes tracks with minimal interactions correctly, which is essential for robustness and error-free operation.
+
+Scenario 3: Calculate Rithm Points for an Empty MusicModel List
+
+Details:
+ TestName: calculateRithmPointsForEmptyList
+ Description: This test is designed to confirm that the algorithmCalc method can handle an empty list gracefully by returning an empty map, ensuring no errors occur.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Prepare an empty list of MusicModel objects.
+ Act: Execute the algorithmCalc method with the empty list.
+ Assert: Assert that the returned map is empty.
+
+Validation:
+ Confirms that the method can handle an edge case where no data is provided, maintaining stability and avoiding unexpected behaviors.
+
+Scenario 4: Handle Null Input Gracefully
+
+Details:
+ TestName: handleNullInputInAlgorithmCalc
+ Description: Tests if the algorithmCalc method can safely handle a null input for the list of MusicModel, ensuring method robustness and appropriate error handling.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Set the input list of MusicModel to null.
+ Act: Call the algorithmCalc method with null as the parameter.
+ Assert: Confirm it either returns null, an empty map, or raises a specific exception, depending on intended design.
+
+Validation:
+ Ensures the function does not break or produce invalid outputs when encountering null input, which is critical for overall application resilience.
+
+Scenario 5: Verify Consistent Points Calculation for Multiple Identical Entries
+
+Details:
+ TestName: verifyConsistentPointsForDuplicateEntries
+ Description: Examines whether algorithmCalc consistently calculates rithm points for multiple identical MusicModel entries, highlighting the calculation integrity for duplicate data.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create a list containing multiple identical MusicModel objects with fixed likes and comments.
+ Act: Pass this list to the algorithmCalc method.
+ Assert: Check the returned map for consistent rithm points for each duplicate name, matching expected totals.
+
+Validation:
+ Validates that the calculation logic is consistent across duplicate entries, ensuring accuracy regardless of data repetition.
+
+*/
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+
+package com.medeiros.SPRINGProject.algorithm;
+
+import com.medeiros.SPRINGProject.Models.MusicModel;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.Map;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Tag;
+import org.mockito.Mockito;
+import java.util.List;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.*;
+import com.medeiros.SPRINGProject.utils.hashMapFunctions;
+
+class AlgorithmBlenderAlgorithmCalcTest extends algorithmData {
+
+ private algorithmBlender algorithmBlender;
+
+ @BeforeEach
+ void setUp() {
+ algorithmBlender = new algorithmBlender();
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void calculateRithmPointsForValidMusicList() {
+ MusicModel music1 = Mockito.mock(MusicModel.class);
+ MusicModel music2 = Mockito.mock(MusicModel.class);
+ when(music1.getNumberOfLikes()).thenReturn(10);
+ when(music1.getNumberOfComents()).thenReturn(5);
+ when(music1.getMusicName()).thenReturn("Song1");
+ when(music2.getNumberOfLikes()).thenReturn(20);
+ when(music2.getNumberOfComents()).thenReturn(10);
+ when(music2.getMusicName()).thenReturn("Song2");
+ Iterable musicList = List.of(music1, music2);
+ HashMap expectedResults = new HashMap<>();
+ expectedResults.put("Song1", rithmPointsByLike(10) + rithmPointsByComents(5));
+ expectedResults.put("Song2", rithmPointsByLike(20) + rithmPointsByComents(10));
+ Map actualResults = algorithmBlender.algorithmCalc(musicList);
+ assertEquals(expectedResults, actualResults);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("boundary")
+ public void calculateRithmPointsWithZeroInteractions() {
+ MusicModel music = Mockito.mock(MusicModel.class);
+ when(music.getNumberOfLikes()).thenReturn(0);
+ when(music.getNumberOfComents()).thenReturn(0);
+ when(music.getMusicName()).thenReturn("NoInteractionSong");
+ Iterable musicList = List.of(music);
+ HashMap expectedResults = new HashMap<>();
+ expectedResults.put("NoInteractionSong", 0);
+ Map actualResults = algorithmBlender.algorithmCalc(musicList);
+ assertEquals(expectedResults, actualResults);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("boundary")
+ public void calculateRithmPointsForEmptyList() {
+ Iterable musicList = List.of();
+ Map actualResults = algorithmBlender.algorithmCalc(musicList);
+ assertTrue(actualResults.isEmpty());
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("invalid")
+ public void handleNullInputInAlgorithmCalc() {
+ try {
+ Map actualResults = algorithmBlender.algorithmCalc(null);
+ assertTrue(actualResults.isEmpty() || actualResults == null);
+ }
+ catch (Exception e) {
+ fail("Method should handle null input gracefully.");
+ }
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void verifyConsistentPointsForDuplicateEntries() {
+ MusicModel music = Mockito.mock(MusicModel.class);
+ when(music.getNumberOfLikes()).thenReturn(15);
+ when(music.getNumberOfComents()).thenReturn(7);
+ when(music.getMusicName()).thenReturn("DuplicateSong");
+ Iterable musicList = List.of(music, music);
+ HashMap expectedResults = new HashMap<>();
+ int calculatedPoints = rithmPointsByLike(15) + rithmPointsByComents(7);
+ expectedResults.put("DuplicateSong", calculatedPoints);
+ Map actualResults = algorithmBlender.algorithmCalc(musicList);
+ assertEquals(expectedResults, actualResults);
+ }
+
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataGetRithmPointsTest.java b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataGetRithmPointsTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7f60689
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataGetRithmPointsTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+/*
+Test generated by RoostGPT for test Rahul-jav-test-15 using AI Type Open AI and AI Model gpt-4o
+
+ROOST_METHOD_HASH=getRithmPoints_82f961bd0d
+ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=getRithmPoints_728e09b79f
+
+Scenario 1: Retrieve the Default Rithm Points
+
+Details:
+ TestName: getDefaultRithmPoints
+ Description: Test the default value of rithmPoints before any modification happens to ensure it returns the expected initial state.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of the algorithmData class without modifying rithmPoints.
+ Act: Call the getRithmPoints method.
+ Assert: Check if the returned value matches the expected default value (usually 0 if not initialized).
+
+Validation:
+ This test verifies the initial state of rithmPoints to ensure consistency in application behavior when no explicit parameter assignments have occurred.
+
+Scenario 2: Correct Update and Retrieval of Rithm Points
+
+Details:
+ TestName: updateAndRetrieveRithmPoints
+ Description: Check if the setRithmPoints method correctly updates the rithmPoints and if the getter reflects this change accurately.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of the algorithmData class and set rithmPoints to a known value using setRithmPoints.
+ Act: Call the getRithmPoints method.
+ Assert: Verify if the returned value matches the known value set previously.
+
+Validation:
+ Ensures the getRithmPoints accurately reflects changes made by setRithmPoints, highlighting the consistency of setter and getter functionality.
+
+Scenario 3: Rithm Points Behavior When Blacklisted
+
+Details:
+ TestName: rithmPointsRetrievalWhenBlacklisted
+ Description: Assess the behavior of getRithmPoints when the algorithmData instance is blacklisted.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Set up an algorithmData class instance with black_list set to true.
+ Act: Fetch the rithmPoints using getRithmPoints.
+ Assert: Confirm if the behavior aligns with business rules (i.e., whether being blacklisted affects point retrieval, potentially still returning set points or indicating restricted access).
+
+Validation:
+ Explores the impact of black_list status on point retrieval to ensure business rules are correctly applied when an entity is flagged as restricted.
+
+Scenario 4: Rithm Points Retrieval When Blocked
+
+Details:
+ TestName: rithmPointsRetrievalWhenBlocked
+ Description: Examines how getRithmPoints behaves when the algorithmData object is blocked.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Arrange for an algorithmData object with blocked set to true.
+ Act: Invoke getRithmPoints to retrieve the current points.
+ Assert: Validate if the points reflect correctly as per application logic (potentially unchanged or with access restrictions).
+
+Validation:
+ Confirms the response and integrity of the getRithmPoints method when an object's access is restricted, ensuring reliability in system behavior.
+
+Scenario 5: Update Points via External Calculations
+
+Details:
+ TestName: updatePointsViaLikesCommentsCalculation
+ Description: Model external influence on rithmPoints through methods rithmPointsByLike and rithmPointsByComents. Evaluate if updates reflect accurately.
+
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of algorithmData and adjust rithmPoints using rithmPointsByLike and rithmPointsByComents.
+ Act: Retrieve the total points using getRithmPoints.
+ Assert: Compare against expected calculations based on given likes and comments.
+
+Validation:
+ Tests the integration between rithmPoints modifications via external calculation methods and direct retrieval, ensuring consistency and correctness in data management.
+
+*/
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+
+package com.medeiros.SPRINGProject.algorithm;
+
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Tag;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotNull;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.*;
+
+class AlgorithmDataGetRithmPointsTest {
+
+ private algorithmData algorithmDataInstance;
+
+ @BeforeEach
+ public void setUp() {
+ algorithmDataInstance = new algorithmData();
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void getDefaultRithmPoints() {
+ int expectedDefaultValue = 0;
+ int actualValue = algorithmDataInstance.getRithmPoints();
+ assertEquals(expectedDefaultValue, actualValue);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void updateAndRetrieveRithmPoints() {
+ int expectedRithmPoints = 50; // TODO: Adjust to specific test scenario
+ algorithmDataInstance.setRithmPoints(expectedRithmPoints);
+ int actualValue = algorithmDataInstance.getRithmPoints();
+ assertEquals(expectedRithmPoints, actualValue);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("boundary")
+ public void rithmPointsRetrievalWhenBlacklisted() {
+ algorithmDataInstance.setBlack_list(true);
+ // Check if business logic alters rithmPoints when blacklisted
+ int initialRithmPoints = 30; // TODO: Adjust to specific test scenario
+ algorithmDataInstance.setRithmPoints(initialRithmPoints);
+ int actualValue = algorithmDataInstance.getRithmPoints();
+ assertEquals(initialRithmPoints, actualValue);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("boundary")
+ public void rithmPointsRetrievalWhenBlocked() {
+ algorithmDataInstance.setBlocked(true);
+ // Check if being blocked affects the retrieval of rithmPoints
+ int initialRithmPoints = 75; // TODO: Adjust to specific test scenario
+ algorithmDataInstance.setRithmPoints(initialRithmPoints);
+ int actualValue = algorithmDataInstance.getRithmPoints();
+ assertEquals(initialRithmPoints, actualValue);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("integration")
+ public void updatePointsViaLikesCommentsCalculation() {
+ int likes = 3; // Example dummy value
+ int comments = 4; // Example dummy value
+ int expectedValue = likes * 10 + comments * 15;
+ int actualValue = algorithmDataInstance.rithmPointsByLike(likes)
+ + algorithmDataInstance.rithmPointsByComents(comments);
+ // Assuming the class system should update or set rithmPoints manually.
+ algorithmDataInstance.setRithmPoints(actualValue);
+ int finalRithmPoints = algorithmDataInstance.getRithmPoints();
+ assertEquals(expectedValue, finalRithmPoints);
+ }
+
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataIsBlackListTest.java b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataIsBlackListTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..61f6843
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataIsBlackListTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+/*
+Test generated by RoostGPT for test Rahul-jav-test-15 using AI Type Open AI and AI Model gpt-4o
+
+ROOST_METHOD_HASH=isBlack_list_560ae9db06
+ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=isBlack_list_4614434c3f
+
+Scenario 1: Verify black_list is false by default
+
+Details:
+ TestName: verifyBlacklistDefaultFalse
+ Description: This test checks if the `isBlack_list` method returns false when a new instance of the class is created, assuming the default value for the `black_list` field is false.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of the `algorithmData` class without any modifications.
+ Act: Call the `isBlack_list` method on the newly created instance.
+ Assert: Use JUnit's `assertFalse` method to check that the returned value is false.
+Validation:
+ This validation verifies that the black_list field behaves correctly when uninitialized, ensuring a default behavior consistent with a non-blacklisted entity.
+
+Scenario 2: Verify black_list returns true after being set to true
+
+Details:
+ TestName: verifyBlacklistReturnsTrueWhenSet
+ Description: This test ensures that the `isBlack_list` method returns true when the `black_list` field is explicitly set to true.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of `algorithmData` and use the `setBlack_list` method to set `black_list` to true.
+ Act: Call the `isBlack_list` method on the instance.
+ Assert: Use JUnit's `assertTrue` method to confirm that the returned value is true.
+Validation:
+ Confirms that the `setBlack_list` method correctly modifies the `black_list` field, affecting the `isBlack_list` output as intended.
+
+Scenario 3: Verify black_list returns false after being set to false
+
+Details:
+ TestName: verifyBlacklistReturnsFalseWhenSet
+ Description: Check that the `isBlack_list` method returns false when the `black_list` field is explicitly set to false after being set to true.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of `algorithmData`, set `black_list` to true using `setBlack_list`, then reset it to false.
+ Act: Call the `isBlack_list` method on the instance.
+ Assert: Use JUnit's `assertFalse` method to ensure the returned value is false.
+Validation:
+ Ensures that the `black_list` attribute can be toggled dynamically, reflecting changes in the `isBlack_list` method output correctly.
+
+Scenario 4: Verify black_list maintains state across multiple checks
+
+Details:
+ TestName: verifyBlacklistStatePersistence
+ Description: Verify that the value returned by `isBlack_list` remains consistent across multiple invocations without interim modifications.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of `algorithmData`, and set `black_list` to a desired state.
+ Act: Call the `isBlack_list` method multiple times consecutively.
+ Assert: Use JUnit's assertion to compare each returned value, ensuring they are identical and match the expected state.
+Validation:
+ Checks for state consistency within the `algorithmData` instance, ensuring that interim method calls do not inadvertently alter the boolean `black_list` status.
+
+Scenario 5: Confirm black_list responds appropriately to being blocked
+
+Details:
+ TestName: verifyBlacklistInteractionWithBlocked
+ Description: Test if blocking the `algorithmData` instance affects the `black_list` output, assuming a logical correlation between these flags.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of `algorithmData`, set both `black_list` and `blocked` using their respective setters.
+ Act: Call the `isBlack_list` method to determine if it reflects the blocked status inadvertently.
+ Assert: Use JUnit assertions to verify that black_list status is independent of the `blocked` status as expected.
+Validation:
+ This validation assesses the independence of the black_list status from the blocked status within the `algorithmData` class, ensuring logical separation and integrity.
+
+*/
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+
+package com.medeiros.SPRINGProject.algorithm;
+
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Tag;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.*;
+
+public class AlgorithmDataIsBlackListTest {
+
+ private algorithmData algData;
+
+ @BeforeEach
+ public void setup() {
+ algData = new algorithmData();
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void verifyBlacklistDefaultFalse() {
+ // Arrange is done in setup
+
+ // Act
+ boolean blackListStatus = algData.isBlack_list();
+
+ // Assert
+ assertFalse(blackListStatus, "The default black_list status should be false.");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void verifyBlacklistReturnsTrueWhenSet() {
+ // Arrange
+ algData.setBlack_list(true);
+
+ // Act
+ boolean blackListStatus = algData.isBlack_list();
+
+ // Assert
+ assertTrue(blackListStatus, "The black_list status should be true after setting it to true.");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void verifyBlacklistReturnsFalseWhenSet() {
+ // Arrange
+ algData.setBlack_list(true);
+ algData.setBlack_list(false);
+
+ // Act
+ boolean blackListStatus = algData.isBlack_list();
+
+ // Assert
+ assertFalse(blackListStatus, "The black_list status should be false after setting it to false.");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void verifyBlacklistStatePersistence() {
+ // Arrange
+ algData.setBlack_list(true);
+
+ // Act
+ boolean firstCheck = algData.isBlack_list();
+ boolean secondCheck = algData.isBlack_list();
+
+ // Assert
+ assertEquals(firstCheck, secondCheck, "The black_list status should remain the same without modifications.");
+ assertTrue(firstCheck, "The continuation state should reflect the initially set true state.");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("integration")
+ public void verifyBlacklistInteractionWithBlocked() {
+ // Arrange
+ algData.setBlack_list(true);
+ algData.setBlocked(true);
+
+ // Act
+ boolean blackListStatus = algData.isBlack_list();
+
+ // Assert
+ assertTrue(blackListStatus,
+ "The black_list status should remain true if initially set so, regardless of blocked status.");
+ // TODO: Add additional checks if blocked status should affect black_list
+ }
+
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataIsBlockedTest.java b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataIsBlockedTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..73a1345
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataIsBlockedTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+/*
+Test generated by RoostGPT for test Rahul-jav-test-15 using AI Type Open AI and AI Model gpt-4o
+
+ROOST_METHOD_HASH=isBlocked_47b7fd7aa5
+ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=isBlocked_75b5602366
+
+Scenario 1: Verify that isBlocked Method Returns True When Blocked is True
+
+Details:
+ TestName: verifyIsBlockedReturnsTrueWhenBlocked
+ Description: This test checks that the `isBlocked` method returns true when the `blocked` field is set to true. It is vital to validate that the method correctly reflects the status of the field, ensuring proper access control or restriction behavior.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Instantiate the class, set the `blocked` field to true using the provided setter method.
+ Act: Invoke the `isBlocked` method.
+ Assert: Use a JUnit assertion to check that the result is true.
+Validation:
+ This assertion verifies that when the `blocked` state is true, the method correctly identifies the user or object as blocked. This is crucial for enforcing business rules related to restrictions.
+
+Scenario 2: Verify that isBlocked Method Returns False When Blocked is False
+
+Details:
+ TestName: verifyIsBlockedReturnsFalseWhenBlocked
+ Description: This test validates that the `isBlocked` method returns false when the `blocked` field is set to false. This is important to ensure that the method correctly identifies non-blocked states, allowing normal operation.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Instantiate the class, set the `blocked` field to false using the provided setter method.
+ Act: Invoke the `isBlocked` method.
+ Assert: Use a JUnit assertion to check that the result is false.
+Validation:
+ The assertion ensures that when the `blocked` state is false, the method accurately reflects this by returning false, thus maintaining the integrity of non-restricted functionality.
+
+Scenario 3: Verify the Default Value of Blocked Field Impacts isBlocked Method
+
+Details:
+ TestName: verifyDefaultBlockedValueImpact
+ Description: This test determines the behavior of the `isBlocked` method when the `blocked` field's default value is uninitialized by any setter. It gives insight into the initial state handling of the method.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Instantiate the class without altering the `blocked` field's value.
+ Act: Invoke the `isBlocked` method.
+ Assert: Use a JUnit assertion to verify the result, anticipating default behavior depending on language and environment defaults.
+Validation:
+ Understanding how the method behaves with an unassigned `blocked` status is important for scenarios where default states must be handled appropriately, such as application initialization safety checks.
+
+*/
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+
+package com.medeiros.SPRINGProject.algorithm;
+
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Tag;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.*;
+
+public class AlgorithmDataIsBlockedTest {
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void verifyIsBlockedReturnsTrueWhenBlocked() {
+ algorithmData data = new algorithmData();
+ data.setBlocked(true); // Arrange: Set blocked to true
+
+ boolean result = data.isBlocked(); // Act: Invoke isBlocked method
+ assertEquals(true, result); // Assert: Check if method returns true
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void verifyIsBlockedReturnsFalseWhenBlocked() {
+ algorithmData data = new algorithmData();
+ data.setBlocked(false); // Arrange: Set blocked to false
+ boolean result = data.isBlocked(); // Act: Invoke isBlocked method
+ assertEquals(false, result); // Assert: Check if method returns false
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("boundary")
+ public void verifyDefaultBlockedValueImpact() {
+ algorithmData data = new algorithmData(); // Arrange: Do not set blocked value
+ boolean result = data.isBlocked(); // Act: Invoke isBlocked method
+ // Assert: Depending on the default behavior (usually false for uninitialized
+ // boolean)
+ assertEquals(false, result); // or assertEquals(true, result); // TODO: Adjust if
+ // default is true
+ }
+
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataRithmPointsByComentsTest.java b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataRithmPointsByComentsTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..93f7cea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataRithmPointsByComentsTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+/*
+Test generated by RoostGPT for test Rahul-jav-test-15 using AI Type Open AI and AI Model gpt-4o
+
+ROOST_METHOD_HASH=rithmPointsByComents_bf0560ce74
+ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=rithmPointsByComents_16f69f99ca
+
+
+Scenario 1: Valid Number of Comments
+
+Details:
+ TestName: rithmPointsByComentsValidInput
+ Description: This test checks that the `rithmPointsByComents` method correctly calculates the rhythm points for a valid number of comments.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of the algorithmData class and set initial conditions or values if needed.
+ Act: Call the `rithmPointsByComents` method with a valid number of comments, e.g., 10.
+ Assert: Assert that the returned rhythm points equal 150 (10 * 15).
+Validation:
+ Verify that the method accurately calculates rhythm points for normal business scenarios. This ensures that the base functionality works for general inputs.
+
+Scenario 2: Zero Comments
+
+Details:
+ TestName: rithmPointsByComentsZeroInput
+ Description: Ensures the method can handle the scenario where the number of comments is zero, expecting zero rhythm points in return.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Prepare an instance of the algorithmData class with any necessary preconditions.
+ Act: Invoke the `rithmPointsByComents` method with 0 as the input.
+ Assert: Use assertions to check that the method returns 0.
+Validation:
+ Confirms that no rhythm points are awarded when there are no comments. Essential for verifying correct behavior with minimal input.
+
+Scenario 3: Negative Comments
+
+Details:
+ TestName: rithmPointsByComentsNegativeInput
+ Description: Tests how the method behaves when given a negative number of comments. The expectation might typically be zero or to handle negatives gracefully.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Initialize the algorithmData object and relevant properties if needed.
+ Act: Execute the `rithmPointsByComents` with a negative number such as -5.
+ Assert: Validate that the result is as expected (either a chosen strict policy or zero).
+Validation:
+ It's important to check if the method handles negative values, which could otherwise suggest a logic flaw if not managed.
+
+Scenario 4: Maximum Integer Comments
+
+Details:
+ TestName: rithmPointsByComentsMaxIntegerInput
+ Description: Verifies that when the maximum integer value is passed, the calculation handles this large input without overflow.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Set up the testing instance as necessary with an object of algorithmData.
+ Act: Call the `rithmPointsByComents` method using Integer.MAX_VALUE.
+ Assert: Check for the correctness of the output (like Integer.MAX_VALUE * 15 or handle potential overflow).
+Validation:
+ Test ensures method robustness against extreme input values, revealing potential limitations or the need for guardrails.
+
+Scenario 5: Comments While Blacklisted
+
+Details:
+ TestName: rithmPointsByComentsWhenBlacklisted
+ Description: Validate that if the user is blacklisted, the rhythm points calculation still functions unless specified otherwise.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of algorithmData, set it to a blacklisted state, and prepare the environment for the test.
+ Act: Execute `rithmPointsByComents` with a positive comment count.
+ Assert: Verify that the method behaves normally unless different logic is supposed under a blacklisted condition.
+Validation:
+ Ensures the method's behavior matches business rules when the user status does not affect the straightforward calculation.
+
+Scenario 6: Comments When Blocked
+
+Details:
+ TestName: rithmPointsByComentsWhenBlocked
+ Description: Confirms that rhythm point computation does not change when the user is blocked, unless explicitly defined.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Use the algorithmData instance set to a blocked status with necessary conditions.
+ Act: Trigger the `rithmPointsByComents` method based on a positive integer argument.
+ Assert: Ensure the computation of rhythm points remains as expected without alteration.
+Validation:
+ Critical for maintaining consistent point logic regardless of user access status, verifying isolated functionality.
+
+*/
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+
+package com.medeiros.SPRINGProject.algorithm;
+
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Tag;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.*;
+
+public class AlgorithmDataRithmPointsByComentsTest {
+
+ private final algorithmData algorithmDataInstance = new algorithmData();
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void rithmPointsByComentsValidInput() {
+ int coments = 10; // TODO: adjust input if needed
+ int expectedPoints = 150;
+ int actualPoints = algorithmDataInstance.rithmPointsByComents(coments);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints,
+ "Expected rhythm points did not match the calculated value for valid input comments.");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("boundary")
+ public void rithmPointsByComentsZeroInput() {
+ int coments = 0;
+ int expectedPoints = 0;
+ int actualPoints = algorithmDataInstance.rithmPointsByComents(coments);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints, "Expected zero rhythm points for zero comments.");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("invalid")
+ public void rithmPointsByComentsNegativeInput() {
+ int coments = -5; // TODO: check for alternative handling
+ int expectedPoints = -75;
+ int actualPoints = algorithmDataInstance.rithmPointsByComents(coments);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints, "Expected rhythm points for negative comments are not matching.");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("boundary")
+ public void rithmPointsByComentsMaxIntegerInput() {
+ int coments = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
+ long expectedPoints = (long) coments * 15; // Cast to long to prevent overflow
+ long actualPoints = (long) algorithmDataInstance.rithmPointsByComents(coments);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints,
+ "Expected rhythm points did not match the calculated value for max integer comments.");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void rithmPointsByComentsWhenBlacklisted() {
+ algorithmDataInstance.setBlack_list(true);
+ int coments = 8; // TODO: adjust input if needed
+ int expectedPoints = 120;
+ int actualPoints = algorithmDataInstance.rithmPointsByComents(coments);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints,
+ "Expected rhythm points calculation is incorrect when the user is blacklisted.");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void rithmPointsByComentsWhenBlocked() {
+ algorithmDataInstance.setBlocked(true);
+ int coments = 12; // TODO: adjust input if needed
+ int expectedPoints = 180;
+ int actualPoints = algorithmDataInstance.rithmPointsByComents(coments);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints,
+ "Expected rhythm points calculation is incorrect when the user is blocked.");
+ }
+
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataRithmPointsByLikeTest.java b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataRithmPointsByLikeTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dbd1653
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/medeiros/SPRINGProject/algorithm/AlgorithmDataRithmPointsByLikeTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+/*
+Test generated by RoostGPT for test Rahul-jav-test-15 using AI Type Open AI and AI Model gpt-4o
+
+ROOST_METHOD_HASH=rithmPointsByLike_f1d922798a
+ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=rithmPointsByLike_817b4e8687
+
+Scenario 1: Calculate Rithm Points for a Positive Number of Likes
+
+Details:
+ TestName: calculateRithmPointsForPositiveLikes
+ Description: This test confirms that a positive number of likes correctly translates into rithm points using the conversion rule likes * 10.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of algorithmData and set a positive number of likes (e.g., 5).
+ Act: Call rithmPointsByLike with the positive number of likes.
+ Assert: Ensure the returned value equals likes * 10 (e.g., 5 * 10 = 50).
+Validation:
+ Verify that the rithm points calculation accurately multiplies the number of likes by 10. This is important to assure user engagement metrics are correctly computed.
+
+Scenario 2: Calculate Rithm Points for Zero Likes
+
+Details:
+ TestName: calculateRithmPointsForZeroLikes
+ Description: This test ensures that zero likes result in zero rithm points.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of algorithmData and set the likes to zero.
+ Act: Call rithmPointsByLike with zero likes.
+ Assert: Check that the returned value is 0.
+Validation:
+ Validate that when there are no likes (zero), the method returns zero rithm points. This maintains consistency in scenarios of non-engagement.
+
+Scenario 3: Handle Negative Likes Input
+
+Details:
+ TestName: handleNegativeLikesInput
+ Description: This test evaluates the method's behavior when a negative number of likes is provided, ensuring it handles such unusual input gracefully.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of algorithmData and set a negative number of likes (e.g., -3).
+ Act: Call rithmPointsByLike with the negative number of likes.
+ Assert: Verify the result is the negative number of likes multiplied by 10 (e.g., -3 * 10 = -30).
+Validation:
+ Confirm the method handles negative inputs per the existing logic by calculating rithm points which might be useful in hypothetical scenarios or system malfunctions.
+
+Scenario 4: Ensure Blacklisted Users Still Generate Points
+
+Details:
+ TestName: ensureBlacklistedUsersGeneratePoints
+ Description: This test checks if being blacklisted affects the calculation of rithm points from likes.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of algorithmData, set black_list status to true, and provide a positive number of likes (e.g., 7).
+ Act: Call rithmPointsByLike with the positive number of likes.
+ Assert: Assert that rithm points are calculated correctly (e.g., 7 * 10 = 70).
+Validation:
+ Ensure that the black_list status does not alter the rithm points calculation from likes, allowing the method to calculate points consistently regardless of blacklist status.
+
+Scenario 5: Ensure Blocked Users Still Generate Points
+
+Details:
+ TestName: ensureBlockedUsersGeneratePoints
+ Description: This test ensures that being blocked does not affect the rithm points calculation derived from likes.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of algorithmData, set blocked status to true, and use a positive number for likes (e.g., 9).
+ Act: Call rithmPointsByLike with the positive number of likes.
+ Assert: Check that the calculated rithm points match expectations (e.g., 9 * 10 = 90).
+Validation:
+ Validate that the blocked status does not impact the computation of rithm points, ensuring points calculation remains independent of user status.
+
+Scenario 6: Large Number of Likes for Rithm Points Calculation
+
+Details:
+ TestName: largeNumberOfLikesForCalculation
+ Description: This test analyzes the method's performance and accuracy with a large number of likes, ensuring it handles large inputs properly.
+Execution:
+ Arrange: Create an instance of algorithmData and set a large number of likes (e.g., 1000000).
+ Act: Call rithmPointsByLike with the large number of likes.
+ Assert: Confirm that the result is correctly computed as likes * 10 (e.g., 1000000 * 10 = 10000000).
+Validation:
+ Verify the method's ability to handle and compute points from a large number of likes, validating its scalability and reliability at higher loads.
+
+*/
+
+// ********RoostGPT********
+
+package com.medeiros.SPRINGProject.algorithm;
+
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Tag;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.*;
+
+class AlgorithmDataRithmPointsByLikeTest {
+
+ private algorithmData algData;
+
+ @BeforeEach
+ public void setup() {
+ algData = new algorithmData();
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void calculateRithmPointsForPositiveLikes() {
+ int likes = 5; // TODO: Adjust the number of likes if needed
+ int expectedPoints = likes * 10;
+ int actualPoints = algData.rithmPointsByLike(likes);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("boundary")
+ public void calculateRithmPointsForZeroLikes() {
+ int likes = 0;
+ int expectedPoints = 0;
+ int actualPoints = algData.rithmPointsByLike(likes);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("invalid")
+ public void handleNegativeLikesInput() {
+ int likes = -3; // TODO: Adjust the negative number of likes if desired
+ int expectedPoints = likes * 10;
+ int actualPoints = algData.rithmPointsByLike(likes);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("integration")
+ public void ensureBlacklistedUsersGeneratePoints() {
+ algData.setBlack_list(true);
+ int likes = 7; // TODO: Adjust number of likes as necessary
+ int expectedPoints = likes * 10;
+ int actualPoints = algData.rithmPointsByLike(likes);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("integration")
+ public void ensureBlockedUsersGeneratePoints() {
+ algData.setBlocked(true);
+ int likes = 9; // TODO: Feel free to modify number of likes
+ int expectedPoints = likes * 10;
+ int actualPoints = algData.rithmPointsByLike(likes);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @Tag("valid")
+ public void largeNumberOfLikesForCalculation() {
+ int likes = 1000000; // TODO: Modify to test other large inputs
+ int expectedPoints = likes * 10;
+ int actualPoints = algData.rithmPointsByLike(likes);
+ assertEquals(expectedPoints, actualPoints);
+ }
+
+}
\ No newline at end of file