Please sign in to comment.
The call-seq directive has no useful effect on our documentation and …
…is not used anywhere else. Worse still, its use breaks some rdoc, replacing method names with a curly brace. Having just one call-seq directive doesn't add anything since this is covered by regular rdoc. Having multiple might make sense, but these are already documented with examples. This partly re-reverts 60de0e5 but does not touch the vendorized code in html-scanner.
- Loading branch information...
Showing with 0 additions and 22 deletions.