Permalink
13 comments
on commit
sign in to comment.
Browse files
Reduced the number of literal aliases to the range that has actually …
…seen personal use. With the massive savings in overhead, I was able to fit Array#forty_two
- Loading branch information...
Showing
with
6 additions
and 30 deletions.
This comment has been minimized.
kerrybNov 21, 2008
ContributorDid you forget to run the test after correcting fourty_two to forty_second? ;-)
kerryb repliedNov 21, 2008
Did you forget to run the test after correcting fourty_two to forty_second? ;-)
This comment has been minimized.
matthewrudyNov 21, 2008
Contributorgreat,
I’ve been waiting for this for ages.
matthewrudy repliedNov 21, 2008
great,
I’ve been waiting for this for ages.
This comment has been minimized.
tilsammansNov 21, 2008
ContributorI am sure I am not getting this.
tilsammans repliedNov 21, 2008
I am sure I am not getting this.
This comment has been minimized.
radarNov 21, 2008
ContributorThis should be Array#forty_second
radar repliedNov 21, 2008
This should be Array#forty_second
This comment has been minimized.
adkronNov 21, 2008
ContributorOk, ok. This is funny. Thanks for reducing the overhead from your previous version.
adkron repliedNov 21, 2008
Ok, ok. This is funny. Thanks for reducing the overhead from your previous version.
This comment has been minimized.
henrikNov 21, 2008
Contributortilsammans: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notable_phrases_from_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy#Answer_to_Life.2C_the_Universe_and_Everything_.2842.29
henrik repliedNov 21, 2008
tilsammans: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notable_phrases_from_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy#Answer_to_Life.2C_the_Universe_and_Everything_.2842.29
This comment has been minimized.
jasonroelofsNov 21, 2008
Awesome, though now we’re missing Array#six and Array#nine.
jasonroelofs repliedNov 21, 2008
Awesome, though now we’re missing Array#six and Array#nine.
This comment has been minimized.
blaixNov 21, 2008
Great, now I’ll have to alias_method_chain this to forty_second…
blaix repliedNov 21, 2008
Great, now I’ll have to alias_method_chain this to forty_second…
This comment has been minimized.
nelNov 21, 2008
Don’t need Array#thirty_seven too ?
nel repliedNov 21, 2008
Don’t need Array#thirty_seven too ?
This comment has been minimized.
charlieokNov 23, 2008
Um, shouldn’t test_second_through_tenth be renamed to test_second_through_fifth?
charlieok repliedNov 23, 2008
Um, shouldn’t test_second_through_tenth be renamed to test_second_through_fifth?
This comment has been minimized.
pandemixNov 25, 2008
Does your test succeed? The method is misspelled, using a ‘u’ where no ‘u’ should be.
Cute, tho’. Nice tip o’ the hat to the late Mr. Adams. Just started re-reading those books. What about 23, 37, and all those other important numbers? ;)
BTW, who uses ‘fourth’ or even ‘third’? (‘fifth’ is right out)
pandemix repliedNov 25, 2008
Does your test succeed? The method is misspelled, using a ‘u’ where no ‘u’ should be.
Cute, tho’. Nice tip o’ the hat to the late Mr. Adams. Just started re-reading those books. What about 23, 37, and all those other important numbers? ;)
BTW, who uses ‘fourth’ or even ‘third’? (‘fifth’ is right out)
This comment has been minimized.
zenhobJul 23, 2009
@radar is right, this should be Array#forty_second.
zenhob repliedJul 23, 2009
@radar is right, this should be Array#forty_second.
This comment has been minimized.
deeTEEceeJul 7, 2016
dafuq?
deeTEEcee repliedJul 7, 2016
dafuq?