Let Sidekiq and Que set provider_job_id#20056
Conversation
|
Thank you! This is a pretty critical integration point with Sidekiq since all its APIs require the JID to work. |
jvanbaarsen
changed the title
|
Added Que job_id reporting as well. |
|
Nice work @jvanbaarsen |
|
@jvanbaarsen could you rebase your branch? Thanks |
|
@rafaelfranca Yes! will do |
When a job is added to Sidekiq by ActiveJob, make sure we still can get the original job_id provider by Sidekiq. We do this by adding the sidekiq jid to provider_job_id field on the job object. Partly fixes rails#18821 Signed-off-by: Jeroen van Baarsen <jeroenvanbaarsen@gmail.com>
|
You might also want to make your adapter tests use the same test as the On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Jeroen van Baarsen <notifications@github.com
Kevin D. Deisz |
jvanbaarsen
force-pushed
the
sidekiq-job-id
branch
from
5f6a766 to
97c2bd1
Compare
|
@kddeisz Ah yeah, good point! Will do as well |
jvanbaarsen
force-pushed
the
sidekiq-job-id
branch
from
14e80bf to
30107c6
Compare
|
@rafaelfranca You want me to squash the commits as well? |
|
It is fine these two commits |
activejob/CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Instead of adding a new entry maybe we should change the entry bellow. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While we're here, are there any other adapters that need this? resque?
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Jeroen van Baarsen <notifications@github.com
wrote:
In activejob/CHANGELOG.md
#20056 (comment):@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+* AllowSidekiqandqueto report the job id back toActiveJob::Baseas@rafaelfranca https://github.com/rafaelfranca Yes sounds good.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/20056/files#r29889786.
Kevin D. Deisz
TrialNetworks - part of DrugDev
Software Developer
383 Elliot Street, Suite G
Newton, MA 02464
+1 617.952.4071 x134 (office)
+1 703.615.0396 (mobile)
kdeisz@trialnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Jeroen van Baarsen <jeroenvanbaarsen@gmail.com>
jvanbaarsen
force-pushed
the
sidekiq-job-id
branch
from
30107c6 to
29fcbc2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kddeisz you agree with this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm fine with that!
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Jeroen van Baarsen <notifications@github.com
wrote:
In activejob/CHANGELOG.md
#20056 (comment):Fixes #18821.
- Kevin Deisz
- Kevin Deisz And Jeroen van Baarsen
@kddeisz https://github.com/kddeisz you agree with this?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/20056/files#r29889974.
Kevin D. Deisz
TrialNetworks - part of DrugDev
Software Developer
383 Elliot Street, Suite G
Newton, MA 02464
+1 617.952.4071 x134 (office)
+1 703.615.0396 (mobile)
kdeisz@trialnetworks.com
|
@rafaelfranca I think its ready to be merged (Once the tests are green 💃 ) |
Let Sidekiq and Que set provider_job_id
|
Will this get into 4.2 or 5+ only? |
|
5+ only. |
|
@mperham So, in current versions there's no way to find the underlying |
|
Not that I'm aware of.
|
|
@diddeb Not out of the box. Only way you can achieve this, is by monkeypatching. |
|
Thanks @jvanbaarsen + @mperham... Freedom Patching it is. |
6 participants
When a job is added to Sidekiq or Que by ActiveJob, make sure we still can get the
original job_id provider by Sidekiq or Que. We do this by adding the Sidekiq jid or Que job_id to
provider_job_id field on the job object.
Partly fixes #18821
This PR is an extension on the PR submitted by @kddeisz : #19910