Loaded associations should not run a new query when size is called#32617
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rails team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @kaspth (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. This repository is being automatically checked for code quality issues using Code Climate. You can see results for this analysis in the PR status below. Newly introduced issues should be fixed before a Pull Request is considered ready to review. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We talked about this briefly in the issue and think this should probably have the !find_target? check as well. Can you investigate why that may matter, and if it does, add a test for it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we don't need the !find_target? since that will be implicit if @association_ids is defined because it calls size.zero?.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you add tests for empty? as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you rebase on current master?
This branch will break existing behavior described at e76e477 since ids_reader doesn't respect dirty target when the target is not loaded yet.
876a6ff to
45f566d
Compare
|
@chancancode I don't think the Thanks to @kamipo, I noticed that the changes I made were causing incorrect results to be returned for models with unsaved associations. Handling that case, I believe, handled the need for |
|
This seems good to me but I would love if @pixeltrix or @kamipo can double check the more subtle aspects of this as I am not super familiar with them, so I might have missed some things. |
|
Thanks for following up! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I prefer @association_ids.size since it is an only place using length in the class.
45f566d to
d061eb4
Compare
|
@kamipo Thank you for the feedback! Updated PR based on your comments and rebased on top of Master |
kamipo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me. Can you squash your commits into one?
Already loaded associations were running an extra query when `size` was called on the association. This fix ensures that an extra query is no longer run. Update tests to use proper methods
d061eb4 to
b07b970
Compare
|
Done! |
|
Thank you @tgturner and everyone else who reviewed the PR! ❤️ |
|
Thanks to everyone that helped! |
Already loaded associations were running an extra query when
sizewas called on the association.This fix ensures that an extra query is no longer run.
This addresses #32569