-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed odd behavior of inverse_of with multiple belongs_to to same class #40643
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
c01e05c
to
1f969fc
Compare
As I said in the Slack, can you elaborate on the context bit more in the commit message? I know the context that what is the cause and a way to prevent the issue, but it is preferable to share the context for other reviewers and future readers. |
kamipo
reviewed
Nov 19, 2020
kamipo
reviewed
Nov 19, 2020
1f969fc
to
ad90033
Compare
kamipo
reviewed
Nov 20, 2020
Typo s/owned_room/user/ user = User.create!
owned_room = Room.create!(owner: user) |
Fix: rails#35204. This PR added validation to `automatic_inverse_of` that foreign_keys are the same. If class has multiple `belongs_to` to same class, `automatic_inverse_of` can find the wrong `inverse_name`. ```ruby class Room < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user belongs_to :owner, class_name: "User" end class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :room has_one :owned_room, class_name: "Room", foreign_key: "owner_id" end user = User.create! owned_room = Room.create!(owner: user) p user.room ``` The current `automatic_inverse_of` validates the `reflection` that found from associations. However, its validation does not validate that foreign keys are the same. so this issue can be fixed by adding a validation of foreign keys. Co-authored-by: alpaca-tc <alpaca-tc@alpaca.tc> Co-authored-by: cat2koban <taba.noritomo@moneyforward.co.jp> Co-authored-by: luccafort <konishi.tatsuro@moneyforward.co.jp>
ad90033
to
5b4a516
Compare
Thank you and congrats for your first contribution 🎉 |
kamipo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2020
Fixed odd behavior of inverse_of with multiple belongs_to to same class
Thank you, too! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix: #35204.
This PR added validation to
automatic_inverse_of
that foreign_keys are the same.If class has multiple
belongs_to
to same class,automatic_inverse_of
can find the wronginverse_name
.The current
automatic_inverse_of
validates thereflection
that found from associations.However, its validation does not validate that foreign keys are the same.
so this issue can be fixed by adding a validation of foreign keys.