Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Active Resource source files from the repository #572

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 13, 2012
Jump to file or symbol
Failed to load files and symbols.
+13 −7,147
Split
View
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ task :build => "all:build"
desc "Release all gems to gemcutter and create a tag"
task :release => "all:release"
-PROJECTS = %w(activesupport activemodel actionpack actionmailer activeresource activerecord railties)
+PROJECTS = %w(activesupport activemodel actionpack actionmailer activerecord railties)
desc 'Run all tests by default'
task :default => %w(test test:isolated)
@@ -109,11 +109,6 @@ RDoc::Task.new do |rdoc|
rdoc.rdoc_files.include('activerecord/lib/active_record/**/*.rb')
rdoc.rdoc_files.exclude('activerecord/lib/active_record/vendor/*')
- rdoc.rdoc_files.include('activeresource/README.rdoc')
- rdoc.rdoc_files.include('activeresource/CHANGELOG.md')
- rdoc.rdoc_files.include('activeresource/lib/active_resource.rb')
- rdoc.rdoc_files.include('activeresource/lib/active_resource/*')
-
rdoc.rdoc_files.include('actionpack/README.rdoc')
rdoc.rdoc_files.include('actionpack/CHANGELOG.md')
rdoc.rdoc_files.include('actionpack/lib/abstract_controller/**/*.rb')
@@ -157,7 +152,6 @@ task :update_versions do
"activemodel" => "ActiveModel",
"actionpack" => "ActionPack",
"actionmailer" => "ActionMailer",
- "activeresource" => "ActiveResource",
"activerecord" => "ActiveRecord",
"railties" => "Rails"
}
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
module ActionController
# The record identifier encapsulates a number of naming conventions for dealing with records, like Active Records or
- # Active Resources or pretty much any other model type that has an id. These patterns are then used to try elevate
- # the view actions to a higher logical level. Example:
+ # pretty much any other model type that has an id. These patterns are then used to try elevate the view actions to
+ # a higher logical level. Example:
#
# # routes
# resources :posts
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ def optimize_routes_generation? #:nodoc:
#
# ==== Relying on named routes
#
- # Passing a record (like an Active Record or Active Resource) instead of a Hash as the options parameter will
+ # Passing a record (like an Active Record) instead of a Hash as the options parameter will
# trigger the named route for that record. The lookup will happen on the name of the class. So passing a
# Workshop object will attempt to use the +workshop_path+ route. If you have a nested route, such as
# +admin_workshop_path+ you'll have to call that explicitly (it's impossible for +url_for+ to guess that route).
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |s|
s.name = 'activemodel'
s.version = version
s.summary = 'A toolkit for building modeling frameworks (part of Rails).'
- s.description = 'A toolkit for building modeling frameworks like Active Record and Active Resource. Rich support for attributes, callbacks, validations, observers, serialization, internationalization, and testing.'
+ s.description = 'A toolkit for building modeling frameworks like Active Record. Rich support for attributes, callbacks, validations, observers, serialization, internationalization, and testing.'
s.required_ruby_version = '>= 1.9.3'
Oops, something went wrong.