Skip to content
Browse files

Some fina comments;

  • Loading branch information...
1 parent 622b0ad commit b4ac45cf3339e6af72b13c2246b4846170eb4d59 @rajarshi committed Mar 18, 2012
Showing with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
  1. +2 −2 resubmit2/third_response.rtf
View
4 resubmit2/third_response.rtf
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ The text has been updated to weaken the assertion and also note the dependency o
\
\pard\pardeftab709\ql\qnatural
-\i \cf2 Could someone with expertise address this please? My suggestion: remove the examples and include another one that is not debatable.\
+\i \cf0 It is certainly true that topological approaches perform comparably to more involved descriptions of molecular structure. Hence we have highlighted two use cases that are not addressable by using labeled graphs (assuming that recalculated parameterizations are not considered - which excludes fragment based approaches for properties such as logP, surface area etc)\
\pard\pardeftab709\ql\qnatural
\f0\i0 \cf0 \uc0\u8232
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ The text has been updated to weaken the assertion and also note the dependency o
\
\pard\pardeftab709\ql\qnatural
-\i \cf0 The text has been updated to note that Open Data on it's own does not lead to good or reproducible science.
+\i \cf0 The text has been updated to note that Open Data on it's own does not lead to good or reproducible science. Due to the page limit restriction we have not gone into explicit details, though we note that some issues are discussed on page 7, c1
\i0 \
\pard\pardeftab709\ql\qnatural

0 comments on commit b4ac45c

Please sign in to comment.
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.