Please sign in to comment.
Make List.reverse a bit less Seqqy
- doesn't actually fix R#2925, but simplifies code - turned out, the iterator approach was as memory hungry as the original "just-reverse-the-reified" approach. - so go back to the "just reverse" approach, and simplify it - remove R:I:ReifiedListReverse, as it is no longer needed To truly fix R#2925, aka having an even number of chained calls to .reverse do nothing, would require a special type of Seq to be returned from .reverse, which would then have its own .reverse method. This seems like overkill to me, but as always: patches welcome!
- Loading branch information...
Showing with 16 additions and 65 deletions.