Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Should 'use p5isms' be renamed / removed / documented & tested #1887
A little while ago I added a
So far, I have not added documentation or tests, because there was some discussion as to the usefulness, and to the naming. Hence my question.
I will add three comments to this Issue that can be used by whoever to add thumbs up / thumbs down so we can have a little poll.
In about a week from now, I will look at it again and go forward with the poll results.
The poll is confusing. Of course it should be documented and tested.... but after being renamed
Personally, I see no reason to encode the name of a specific language in a pragma. It might be making sense right now, but what about 10 years from now, when there's Pumpkin 11 instead of "p5" and dozens of other similar errors for Go, Node, Ruby, and Python?