Allow postfix operator called as method after unary postfix hyper operator #339
Conversation
…rator currently something like '(my @A = 1)>>.++' fails, since METAOP_HYPER_CALL is called instead of METAOP_HYPER_POSTFIX. Fixes RT #122342.
|
This patch gives me clean spectests on all backends and fixes RT #122342. On the other hand I'm not sure it's the right patch. Currently if Also I'm not sure whether it's better to lump the two lines with |
|
FTR, on #perl6 we discussed that excluding word-character-based postfix operators might be a way forward, so something like |
…tor, but only for non-wordy operators The previous version which special cased postfix:<i> only seemed too fragile. Now the dotted form is allowed only for non-wordy operators.
|
I changed Also I assembled some tests: https://gist.github.com/usev6/1b805c3f0dad510b8f32 With my patch all those tests pass (as does a spectest). Do you think the tested behaviour is reasonable? |
Allow postfix operator called as method after unary postfix hyper operator
|
Thanks for the patches and your patience, @usev6. It would be awesome if you could turn your gist into spectests. |
currently something like '(my @A = 1)>>.++' fails, since METAOP_HYPER_CALL is called
instead of METAOP_HYPER_POSTFIX. Fixes RT #122342.