Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CMCDA v1.1 Schematic Incorrect #847

Closed
tegan-lamoureux opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 11 comments
Closed

CMCDA v1.1 Schematic Incorrect #847

tegan-lamoureux opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 11 comments
Labels
idle This issue is idle and will be closed shortly.

Comments

@tegan-lamoureux
Copy link

tegan-lamoureux commented Mar 14, 2018

Hi there,

Just a heads up, the pin numbering on J4 of this schematic is backwards. It's also possible J2 is backwards for the same reason, although I haven't verified this.

I used it as a reference for a custom Compute Module 3 board, and realized when we hooked up our display that I was shorting 3.3V to ground. The reversing is clear when visually inspecting it, and I also verified this with a multi-meter. I have v1.1 of the board.

It's a pretty valuable schematic, as it's one of only two ways to find a pinout of the ribbon cable for the foundation's official 7" display (the second being the PI3 schematic, which uses a different connector). Publicly listing the ribbon cable pinout in the display's documentation would also be a massive help!

Thank you for your help! Image of connector: (Pin 15 is on the left.)

img_20180313_180456

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

@Roger-Thornton any thoughts?

@Roger-Thornton
Copy link

I believe @mike-stimson designed this board so I will have to defer to him for comment.

@lurch
Copy link
Contributor

lurch commented Mar 19, 2018

I wonder if this might be anything to do with https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=98&t=80508 ?

@mike-stimson
Copy link

This isn't my doing, but I think I can guess why this has happened. I think the intention has been to maintain the pin numbering w.r.t. Pi3, eg, DSI_D1_N is pin 2 on both the adaptor and Pi3. I'll admit this could be a lot clearer though.
These kinds of things are always going to be confusing on this type of connector where adaptors are involved. The Pi3 schematic should always be used as a reference for connector pinouts.
Incidentally, if the pinout has been accidentally reversed on a design, then a flex with the contacts on opposite sides of the flex (ie, top and bottom) can be used (or both on the same side, depending on where the inversion is).

@tegan-lamoureux
Copy link
Author

It's not really that confusing. It's just factually incorrect. 3.3v doesn't go to pin 14 and 15 of the SFW15R-2STE1LF connector as routed on the schematic, it goes to pin 1 and 2. The connector has pin 1 and 15 physically labeled in the moulded shell, and the signals don't match that numbering.

Anyways, just thought I'd bring it up. As you said, there's plenty of cables and top/bottom contact connectors that make this an easy fix. Thank you.

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

@mike-stimson @tegan-lamoureux So does something need to change in the documentation?

Note, file in question has changed name and moved.
https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/hardware/computemodule/schematics/rpi_SCH_CMCDA_1p1.pdf

@tegan-lamoureux
Copy link
Author

The schematic is incorrect, so I would say yes. Or at least make a note of it. Anyone with one of these adapters can confirm this.

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

JamesH65 commented Oct 1, 2018

@mike-stimson Are we likely to be able to fix this in the nr future?

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

JamesH65 commented Oct 1, 2018

Seems this is more @jimbojr issue. Any thoughts?

@ebenolson
Copy link

Very similar problem affected me when I based my CM3 board on the CMIO schematic.

Agree that this is not confusing but simply wrong - the schematics do not reflect the reality of the design, and a board manufactured according to them will not function.

@aallan aallan added idle This issue is idle and will be closed shortly. and removed in progress labels Jun 7, 2021
@aallan
Copy link
Contributor

aallan commented Jun 8, 2021

Schematics and other non-web content will be moved out of the repo ahead of #1911. Closing.

@aallan aallan closed this as completed Jun 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
idle This issue is idle and will be closed shortly.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants