Permalink
Browse files

libsas: fix sas_discover_devices return code handling

commit b17caa1 upstream.

commit 198439e [SCSI] libsas: do not set res = 0 in sas_ex_discover_dev()
commit 19252de [SCSI] libsas: fix wide port hotplug issues

The above commits seem to have confused the return value of
sas_ex_discover_dev which is non-zero on failure and
sas_ex_join_wide_port which just indicates short circuiting discovery on
already established ports.  The result is random discovery failures
depending on configuration.

Calls to sas_ex_join_wide_port are the source of the trouble as its
return value is errantly assigned to 'res'.  Convert it to bool and stop
returning its result up the stack.

Tested-by: Dan Melnic <dan.melnic@amd.com>
Reported-by: Dan Melnic <dan.melnic@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jack Wang <jack_wang@usish.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
  • Loading branch information...
1 parent 705c1a5 commit 533c8ed12eea42986cb692c45c4c86512d1ca37d @djbw djbw committed with bwhacks Jun 22, 2012
Showing with 12 additions and 27 deletions.
  1. +12 −27 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ static struct domain_device *sas_ex_discover_end_dev(
}
/* See if this phy is part of a wide port */
-static int sas_ex_join_wide_port(struct domain_device *parent, int phy_id)
+static bool sas_ex_join_wide_port(struct domain_device *parent, int phy_id)
{
struct ex_phy *phy = &parent->ex_dev.ex_phy[phy_id];
int i;
@@ -790,11 +790,11 @@ static int sas_ex_join_wide_port(struct domain_device *parent, int phy_id)
sas_port_add_phy(ephy->port, phy->phy);
phy->port = ephy->port;
phy->phy_state = PHY_DEVICE_DISCOVERED;
- return 0;
+ return true;
}
}
- return -ENODEV;
+ return false;
}
static struct domain_device *sas_ex_discover_expander(
@@ -932,8 +932,7 @@ static int sas_ex_discover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id)
return res;
}
- res = sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, phy_id);
- if (!res) {
+ if (sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, phy_id)) {
SAS_DPRINTK("Attaching ex phy%d to wide port %016llx\n",
phy_id, SAS_ADDR(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr));
return res;
@@ -978,8 +977,7 @@ static int sas_ex_discover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id)
if (SAS_ADDR(ex->ex_phy[i].attached_sas_addr) ==
SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr)) {
ex->ex_phy[i].phy_state= PHY_DEVICE_DISCOVERED;
- res = sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, i);
- if (!res)
+ if (sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, i))
SAS_DPRINTK("Attaching ex phy%d to wide port %016llx\n",
i, SAS_ADDR(ex->ex_phy[i].attached_sas_addr));
@@ -1849,32 +1847,20 @@ static int sas_discover_new(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id)
{
struct ex_phy *ex_phy = &dev->ex_dev.ex_phy[phy_id];
struct domain_device *child;
- bool found = false;
- int res, i;
+ int res;
SAS_DPRINTK("ex %016llx phy%d new device attached\n",
SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id);
res = sas_ex_phy_discover(dev, phy_id);
if (res)
- goto out;
- /* to support the wide port inserted */
- for (i = 0; i < dev->ex_dev.num_phys; i++) {
- struct ex_phy *ex_phy_temp = &dev->ex_dev.ex_phy[i];
- if (i == phy_id)
- continue;
- if (SAS_ADDR(ex_phy_temp->attached_sas_addr) ==
- SAS_ADDR(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr)) {
- found = true;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (found) {
- sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, phy_id);
+ return res;
+
+ if (sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, phy_id))
return 0;
- }
+
res = sas_ex_discover_devices(dev, phy_id);
- if (!res)
- goto out;
+ if (res)
+ return res;
list_for_each_entry(child, &dev->ex_dev.children, siblings) {
if (SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr) ==
SAS_ADDR(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr)) {
@@ -1884,7 +1870,6 @@ static int sas_discover_new(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id)
break;
}
}
-out:
return res;
}

0 comments on commit 533c8ed

Please sign in to comment.