Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

M> Wikipedia Pages #77

Closed
patrick727 opened this issue Aug 9, 2017 · 9 comments

Comments

@patrick727
Copy link
Contributor

commented Aug 9, 2017

Wikipedia Draft Google Doc

Jacob Bassiri has begun a wikipedia draft for Rchain,

Please contribute to the editing process by suggesting within this document.

Thank you

@kdvalentine

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Aug 9, 2017

Should a Rho-Calculus have it's own wiki as well? Content could be derived from the various papers already written.

@patrick727 patrick727 moved this from todo to in progress in Marketing Aug 9, 2017

@patrick727

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Aug 10, 2017

@kdvalentine yes that's a good idea! and so should rholang

@patrick727 patrick727 moved this from in progress to verification in Marketing Aug 23, 2017

@patrick727

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Aug 31, 2017

@jbassiri any news on the wikipedia submission?

@jbassiri

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Aug 31, 2017

Not yet! It's been a little over 3 weeks so expecting something soon.

@patrick727

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Sep 1, 2017

OK thank you!

@dckc

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Sep 13, 2017

The only source in that draft looks like a self-cite. It doesn't look appropriate for Wikipeidia. cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research

What are some good 3rd party sources? i.e. other people writing about rchain?

@dckc

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Sep 13, 2017

Everything in the reference is original research, no? msta039 likewise.

The geekwire piece looks appropriate.

The coinfund article is borderline; it bears "Disclosure: The author of this article received compensation from RChain ..."

@dckc

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Sep 13, 2017

I'm not aware of a wikipedia submission process that takes 3 weeks. Edits are instantaneous, no? Somebody clue me in?

p.s. the fact that this issue is tagged Marketing suggests pretty strongly that this whole effort goes against https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest . You're not supposed to write about your own work.

p.s. I learned this by getting a gentle slap on the wrist for editing pages on XML or something.

p.p.s. My contributions to wikipedia aren't extensive, but they go back to 2006.

@patrick727 patrick727 changed the title Wikipedia Pages M> Wikipedia Pages Dec 8, 2017

@patrick727 patrick727 removed this from verification in Marketing Dec 8, 2017

@patrick727 patrick727 added this to pending, because in M> Content Creation Dec 11, 2017

@lapin7 lapin7 closed this Jan 12, 2018

@dckc dckc added the zz-Marketing label Jan 15, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.