chore(setup): integrate LGTM #1258

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 28, 2016

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
Member

Dattaya commented Nov 22, 2016 edited

@mxstbr, first it didn't work for a non default branch like you said on gitter, then I did nothing and it started to work , you can see that in my experimental repository: Dattaya/Temp#3

Also, LGTM hook appeared on branch's settings page (appeared unchecked I checked it myself):
image

#1209

@Dattaya Dattaya chore(setup): integrate LGTM
fe010cd
+chaintng
+samit4me
+amilajack
+Dattaya
@Dattaya

Dattaya Nov 22, 2016

Member

Have I missed someone?

@mxstbr

mxstbr Nov 22, 2016

Owner

I think you got them all, nice!

coveralls commented Nov 22, 2016 edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 98.77% when pulling fe010cd on Dattaya:integrate-lgtm into 6c637d5 on mxstbr:master.

@mxstbr

mxstbr approved these changes Nov 22, 2016 View changes

Awesome, let's do this! LGTM

+chaintng
+samit4me
+amilajack
+Dattaya
@mxstbr

mxstbr Nov 22, 2016

Owner

I think you got them all, nice!

Member

Dattaya commented Nov 22, 2016 edited

Predictably, Appveyor failed due to #1246 that was fixed in dev but not in master.

Owner

samit4me commented Nov 26, 2016 edited

LGTM, is this something we can merge into dev so it will be merged to master in the next release?

Owner

mxstbr commented Nov 28, 2016

I think we should merge this into master, otherwise it won't be enabled until the next release

mxstbr merged commit 251c31c into react-boilerplate:master Nov 28, 2016

2 of 3 checks passed

continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build failed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
deploy/netlify Deploy preview ready!
Details

Dattaya deleted the Dattaya:integrate-lgtm branch Nov 28, 2016

@PierrickGT PierrickGT pushed a commit to PierrickGT/react-boilerplate that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2016

@Dattaya Dattaya + Turelier Pierrick chore(setup): integrate LGTM (#1258) 451adec
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment