Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix small error in TupleUtils asciidoc #2201

Merged

Conversation

nicolasgavalda
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes a small error in reactor-extra's TupleUtils doc.

@pivotal-issuemaster
Copy link

@nicolasgavalda Please sign the Contributor License Agreement!

Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request.

See the FAQ for frequently asked questions.

@pivotal-issuemaster
Copy link

@nicolasgavalda Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement!

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 18, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2201 into 3.3.x will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              3.3.x    #2201      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     82.19%   82.22%   +0.03%     
- Complexity     4134     4136       +2     
============================================
  Files           380      380              
  Lines         31447    31450       +3     
  Branches       5844     5844              
============================================
+ Hits          25848    25860      +12     
+ Misses         4039     4034       -5     
+ Partials       1560     1556       -4     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...main/java/reactor/core/publisher/ParallelFlux.java 92.77% <ø> (ø) 98.00 <0.00> (ø)
...ore/src/main/java/reactor/core/publisher/Flux.java 96.02% <100.00%> (ø) 529.00 <1.00> (ø)
...src/main/java/reactor/core/publisher/MonoNext.java 87.17% <0.00%> (-2.57%) 2.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...in/java/reactor/core/publisher/FluxWindowWhen.java 84.13% <0.00%> (-1.45%) 2.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...eactor/core/publisher/ParallelMergeSequential.java 84.97% <0.00%> (-0.52%) 7.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...c/main/java/reactor/core/publisher/FluxReplay.java 84.83% <0.00%> (-0.15%) 29.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...ore/src/main/java/reactor/core/publisher/Mono.java 88.81% <0.00%> (+0.07%) 277.00% <0.00%> (+2.00%)
...ain/java/reactor/core/publisher/FluxConcatMap.java 90.83% <0.00%> (+0.55%) 7.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...rc/main/java/reactor/core/publisher/Operators.java 82.23% <0.00%> (+1.15%) 137.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
...main/java/reactor/core/publisher/FluxGenerate.java 85.27% <0.00%> (+2.45%) 7.00% <0.00%> (ø%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c7e8baf...c06efbb. Read the comment docs.

@ericbottard ericbottard self-assigned this Jun 24, 2020
@ericbottard ericbottard changed the base branch from master to 3.2.x June 24, 2020 14:25
@ericbottard ericbottard changed the base branch from 3.2.x to master June 24, 2020 14:26
@ericbottard ericbottard force-pushed the fix-reactorextra-tupleutils-asciidoc branch from 4c1ac1d to c06efbb Compare June 24, 2020 14:57
@ericbottard ericbottard changed the base branch from master to 3.3.x June 24, 2020 14:57
@ericbottard
Copy link
Contributor

Merging in 3.3.x.

Thanks for your contribution @nicolasgavalda !

@ericbottard ericbottard merged commit d2ff8ae into reactor:3.3.x Jun 24, 2020
@reactorbot
Copy link

@ericbottard this PR seems to have been merged on a maintenance branch, please ensure the change is merge-forwarded to intermediate maintenance branches and up to master 🙇

ericbottard added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
@ericbottard ericbottard added the type/documentation A documentation update label Jun 24, 2020
@ericbottard ericbottard added this to the 3.3.8.RELEASE milestone Jun 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants