Skip to content

Enhance Docs w/ link to reagent component blog - #437

Merged
Deraen merged 1 commit into
reagent-project:masterfrom
tmattacchione:patch-1
Aug 13, 2019
Merged

Deraen merged 1 commit into
reagent-project:masterfrom
tmattacchione:patch-1

Conversation

@tmattacchione

@tmattacchione tmattacchione commented Jul 29, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

what the reagent component is a blog post that gets into the nitty gritty details of what it means when the docs say "underneath they are all just React components".

If there is anything missing from a technical perspective, I am happy to correct 😄

`what the reagent component` is a blog post that details in a little more detail what it means when "underneath they are all just React components".
@Deraen
Deraen merged commit 2f4f9ac into reagent-project:master Aug 13, 2019
@Deraen

Deraen commented Aug 13, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks! Very nice post.

For those who want to know why the Reagent team chose to modify the pseudoclassical instantiation pattern I do not really have an answer. At the end of the day, they do more or less the same things without any significant downsides.

Me neither :) But I wasn't even aware of the differences, so I guess this will be something I'll look into, especially if there is something which could improve the performance of Reagent.

Note, in general I'd prefer having the information here in the Reagent docs instead of blog posts. It will be easier to update local docs.

@tmattacchione

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Note, in general I'd prefer having the information here in the Reagent docs instead of blog posts

Noted 😄 I was thinking about posting this in the docs, but it is...substantial lol. Thanks for the merge 👍

@tmattacchione
tmattacchione deleted the patch-1 branch August 23, 2019 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants