Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unexpected behavior of "SWS/S&M: focus next floating fx for selected tracks (cycle)" #287

Closed
Jeff0S opened this issue Jul 8, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@Jeff0S
Copy link
Member

@Jeff0S Jeff0S commented Jul 8, 2014

From jeffos...@gmail.com on April 29, 2011 16:23:04

From Veto ( http://forum.cockos.com/showpost.php?p=728816&postcount=316 ):


i wondered about these actions too. And i have to say now, this is a cool option handling with fx's.

Something that i've encountered:

with "SWS/S&M: focus next floating fx (cycle)" there is a cyclepoint where no fx is displayed, so to say a "desktop view".
I liked that.
Theres no such point with "SWS/S&M: focus next floating fx for selected tracks (cycle)". What do you think?


it should (i.e. it should only show the main view on cycle point, that is to say it should unfloat FX windows of selected tracks)
in fact, this reports hides 2 possible bugs when a single track is selected:

  1. fx windows not "unfloated" at cycle point
  2. fx windows "unfloated" but not at cycle point (i.e. some FX windows are not properly focused)

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/sws-extension/issues/detail?id=287

@Jeff0S
Copy link
Member Author

@Jeff0S Jeff0S commented Jul 8, 2014

From mths.f...@googlemail.com on April 30, 2011 04:48:42

thanks!
its working pretty with the new beta :)

@Jeff0S
Copy link
Member Author

@Jeff0S Jeff0S commented Jul 8, 2014

From jeffos...@gmail.com on April 30, 2011 06:11:16

thank YOU for the report Veto (and the great S&M live config doc in the ALR, just dicovered it yesterday while updating the summary!)

fixed r460 / v2.0.0.19

Status: Fixed

@Jeff0S
Copy link
Member Author

@Jeff0S Jeff0S commented Jul 8, 2014

From mths.f...@googlemail.com on April 30, 2011 09:14:23

hehe..you're welcome jeffos, this really deserves a good doc, i just hope i dont made too much mistakes ;)

@Jeff0S Jeff0S closed this Jul 8, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant