From jeffos...@gmail.com on April 29, 2011 16:23:04
From Veto ( http://forum.cockos.com/showpost.php?p=728816&postcount=316 ):
i wondered about these actions too. And i have to say now, this is a cool option handling with fx's.
Something that i've encountered:
with "SWS/S&M: focus next floating fx (cycle)" there is a cyclepoint where no fx is displayed, so to say a "desktop view".
I liked that.
Theres no such point with "SWS/S&M: focus next floating fx for selected tracks (cycle)". What do you think?
it should (i.e. it should only show the main view on cycle point, that is to say it should unfloat FX windows of selected tracks)
in fact, this reports hides 2 possible bugs when a single track is selected:
- fx windows not "unfloated" at cycle point
- fx windows "unfloated" but not at cycle point (i.e. some FX windows are not properly focused)
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/sws-extension/issues/detail?id=287
From jeffos...@gmail.com on April 29, 2011 16:23:04
From Veto ( http://forum.cockos.com/showpost.php?p=728816&postcount=316 ):
i wondered about these actions too. And i have to say now, this is a cool option handling with fx's.
Something that i've encountered:
with "SWS/S&M: focus next floating fx (cycle)" there is a cyclepoint where no fx is displayed, so to say a "desktop view".
I liked that.
Theres no such point with "SWS/S&M: focus next floating fx for selected tracks (cycle)". What do you think?
it should (i.e. it should only show the main view on cycle point, that is to say it should unfloat FX windows of selected tracks)
in fact, this reports hides 2 possible bugs when a single track is selected:
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/sws-extension/issues/detail?id=287