Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2216707: Fixes for topology view for external mode #902

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2023

Conversation

bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

@bipuladh bipuladh commented Jun 15, 2023

Screenshot from 2023-06-15 19-08-19

@bipuladh bipuladh force-pushed the topo-ext-fix branch 2 times, most recently from b3e7c6c to 33286b6 Compare June 15, 2023 13:25
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bipuladh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Comment on lines 846 to 862
"Topology view is not supported for External Mode": "Topology view is not supported for External Mode",
"No StorageCluster found": "No StorageCluster found",
"Topology view is not supported for external mode": "Topology view is not supported for external mode",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same text twice ?? with "E" and "e" in external

isExternalMode?: boolean;
};

const TopologyViewErrorMessage: React.FC<TopologyViewEmptyStateProps> = ({
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't here the component name and the props type name be the same?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ack

Comment on lines 610 to 616
{isExternalMode
? t('Topology view is not supported for External Mode')
: t('No StorageCluster found')}
</Title>
<EmptyStateBody>
{t('Set up a storage cluster to view the topology')}
{isExternalMode
? t('Topology view is not supported for external mode')
: t('Set up a storage cluster to view the topology')}
</EmptyStateBody>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same title and description for external mode ??
also, "E" and "e" in external in both texts...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes as per UXD team we can remove the description updating it.

@bipuladh bipuladh changed the title Fixes for topology view for external mode Bug 2216707: Fixes for topology view for external mode Jun 22, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2023

@bipuladh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2216707, which is valid.

No validations were run on this bug

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

Bug 2216707: Fixes for topology view for external mode

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2023

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: PrasadDesala.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@bipuladh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2216707, which is valid.

No validations were run on this bug

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

Bug 2216707: Fixes for topology view for external mode

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Signed-off-by: Bipul Adhikari <badhikar@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2023

@bipuladh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2216707, which is valid.

No validations were run on this bug

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

Bug 2216707: Fixes for topology view for external mode

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2023

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: PrasadDesala.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@bipuladh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2216707, which is valid.

No validations were run on this bug

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

Bug 2216707: Fixes for topology view for external mode

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Jun 22, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 53b0b66 into red-hat-storage:master Jun 22, 2023
6 checks passed
@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Collaborator

/cherry-pick release-4.13

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Collaborator

/cherry-pick release-4.13-compatibility

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@SanjalKatiyar: new pull request created: #908

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@SanjalKatiyar: new pull request created: #909

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.13-compatibility

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants