Bug 2069314: csi: make storage class updated with csi-users in external cluster

[parth-gr]

Description of your changes:

For using restricted auth users we need to update the
restricted users in the Storage class, so updating
it in the json output for external cluster

Signed-off-by: parth-gr paarora@redhat.com

Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #

Checklist:

• Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
• Skip Tests for Docs: Add the flag for skipping the build if this is only a documentation change. See here for the flag.
• Skip Unrelated Tests: Add a flag to run tests for a specific storage provider. See test options.
• Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
• Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
• Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
• Integration tests have been added, if necessary.
• Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes, if necessary.
• Upgrade from previous release is tested and upgrade user guide is updated, if necessary.
• Code generation (make codegen) has been run to update object specifications, if necessary.

[parth-gr]

/cc @travisn @leseb @agarwal-mudit @srai@redhat.com

[travisn]

Shall we also backport this on top of the black formatting changes from rook#10399 so we don't have merge conflicts in the future backports?

[parth-gr]

/do-not-merge for a while

[parth-gr]

Shall we also backport this on top of the black formatting changes from rook#10399 so we don't have merge conflicts in the future backports?

Okay yes, checking with Subham

[subhamkrai]

Shall we also backport this on top of the black formatting changes from rook#10399 so we don't have merge conflicts in the future backports?

can we bp black changes to 4.11 without bz?

[subhamkrai]

but agree to merge black changes will resolve lot of merge conflicts, in any upcoming prs too

[openshift-ci]

@parth-gr: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2069314, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2069314: csi: make storage class updated with csi-users in external cluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[agarwal-mudit]

@subhamkrai Lets raise a BZ, its just formatting changes, I can ask QE to ack it based on regression.
/bugzilla refresh
/hold

[openshift-ci]

@agarwal-mudit: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2069314, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @vavuthu

In response to this:

@subhamkrai Lets raise a BZ, its just formatting changes, I can ask QE to ack it based on regression.
/bugzilla refresh
/hold

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: vavuthu.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@agarwal-mudit: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2069314, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @vavuthu

In response to this:

@subhamkrai Lets raise a BZ, its just formatting changes, I can ask QE to ack it based on regression.
/bugzilla refresh
/hold

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[subhamkrai]

@subhamkrai Lets raise a BZ, its just formatting changes, I can ask QE to ack it based on regression. /bugzilla refresh /hold

Thanks @agarwal-mudit, I'll raise the bz and create the BP pr

[parth-gr]

/unhold

[agarwal-mudit]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: agarwal-mudit, parth-gr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [agarwal-mudit]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@parth-gr: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• red-hat-storage/rook#386

Bugzilla bug 2069314 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2069314: csi: make storage class updated with csi-users in external cluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.