-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
[test] Fix misleading variant description in the affinity check #1200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Can I test this patch? |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1200 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.17% 92.17%
=======================================
Files 81 81
Lines 11999 11999
=======================================
Hits 11060 11060
Misses 939 939
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
ok to test |
teojgo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mand35 please change also the corresponding variant name in https://github.com/eth-cscs/reframe/blob/6b2dc404c7b27feaeca81f3585a6104202fe718c/cscs-checks/prgenv/affinity_check.py#L132
|
Thanks @teojgo for the hint. change applied. |
vkarak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mand35 Thanks! lgtm.
No description provided.