With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". time thereafter, the parties engaged in settlement negotiations, both independently and with the assistance of the Court. The settlement negotiations were unsuccessful, and on August 29, 2017, the Court reserved decision. The Applicable Legal Standards The Summary Judgment Standard Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), made applicable to this adversary proceeding by Bankruptcy Rule 7056, provides that summary judgment is appropriate “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispu that there is no genuine dispute as to a material fact as to each element of its claim. If it does not, then summary judgment will be denied. See Smith v. Goord, 2008 WL 902184, at *4 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2008), aff'd, 375 Fed.Appx. 73 (2d Cir. 2010) (citing Anderson, 477 U.S. at 250 n.4, 106 S.Ct. 2505) (<HOLDING>)). Once the moving party satisfies its initial

A: holding that the moving party for summary judgment bears the initial burden of demonstrating the absence of a genuine issue of material fact for trial
B: holding that when there are no genuine issues of material fact summary judgment is appropriate
C: holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if there is a genuine dispute about a material fact
D: holding that summary judgment should be denied where the moving party does not show that there is no genuine dispute as to a material fact with respect to each essential element of the claim
D.