With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by the state. Appellant moves to quash the circuit court’s orders stating that he has complied with all pleading requirements to obtain a transcript. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b) allows for this appeal from the revocation of probation and imposition of sentence. Appellant states that the fact that he entered a plea does not preclude him from pursuing his direct appeal with a record on appeal. See State v. Trowell, 739 So.2d 77 (Fla.1999); Ford v. State, 575 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The state takes no position on appellant’s motion. In a direct criminal appeal, an indigent is entitled to have all proceedings transcribed at public expense that are necessary to support the appellant’s claims. See Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956) (<HOLDING>). A trial court cannot withhold transcripts

A: holding that state and federal equal protection guarantees provide similar protections
B: holding that as a matter of equal protection the state must provide indigent defendants with the basic tools of an adequate defense or appeal when those tools are available for a price to other defendants
C: holding that lprs are entitled to the protection of the equal protection clause
D: holding that the state law violated equal protection principles
B.