With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". en uring a drug trafficking offense and carrying a pistol without a license, both premised on a gun that McLendon allegedly had on his person at the time of his arrest. 6 .See Greer v. Miller, 4 754 (D.C.Cir.1998) (”[T]he defendant bears the initial burden of showing government inducement; if he is successful, the burden then shifts to the government to prove the defendant was predisposed to commit the crime.”). 8 . Government behavior amounts to inducement only “when it was such that a law-. abiding citizen’s will to obey the law could have been overborne.’ ” Glover, 153 F.3d at 754 (quoting United States v. Kelly, 748 F.2d 691, 698 (D.C.Cir.1984)); 'see also United States v. Hanson, 339 F.3d 983, 989 (D.C.Cir. 2003). 9 . See United States v. Neville, 82 F.3d 1101, 1107 (D.C.Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>); Walls, 70 F.3d at 1329 (holding that where

A: holding the trial court erred when it instructed the jury that it may find the defendant guilty of conspiracy if the jury found the defendant agreed with at least one other person where the indictment charged the defendant with conspiring with a single named individual and the evidence tended to show the defendant may have conspired with a number of persons not just the named coconspirator to commit an unlawful act
B: holding that the alacrity and active interest with which the defendant embraced the plan to smuggle drugs would justify a jury in finding him predisposed to commit the crime
C: holding that trial counsels strategy of explaining that defendant was at the scene of crime to deal drugs rather than commit robbery was not unreasonable
D: holding that because statutory variants of an underlying crime are not elements of an attempt to commit the underlying crime jurors are not required to unanimously find which specific statutory variant the defendant intended to commit it is sufficient that they unanimously conclude that the defendant intended to commit any of the applicable statutory variants
B.