With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the court stated: [T]his argument-ignores the explicit language- of the [“charge” exception]. There is no dispute that the [National Park Service], which operates Fort Jefferson, does not charge a fee for entry into the Park. The fact that licensing fees are charged to boat and seaplane charter operators or that fees are charged by private taxi services for transportation purposes does not change the fact that no charge is made for entering or using the park area. Id. at 1582; see also Carlton v. Cleburne County, 93 F.3d 505, 510 (8th Cir.1996) (“Because there was no entrance fee, or any other fee of any kind, paid in the instant case, we conclude the ‘charge’ exception to [Arkansas’s recreational use statute] does not apply.”); Wilson v. United States, 989 F.2d 953, 957 (8th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); Kirkland v. United States, 930 F.Supp. 1443,

A: holding that a cause of action for damages to property resulting from a permanent nuisance accrues to the owner of the land at the time the injury begins to affect the land and mere transfer of the land by deed does not transfer the claim for damages
B: holding that animal husbandry operations were included in the definition of farm even if the animals do not touch the ground graze on the land or feed from crops grown on the land and holding that land used to support buildings used in the production of agricultural products is a productive use of the land
C: holding that 2 per personper night fee paid by boy scout troop to spend the night at army military post was not a charge to enter onto the land or for use of the land and therefore did not fall within the charge exception
D: holding that land sales contracts were not securities because they involved no investment in an enterprise even if land was bought on expectation that development of the area would increase the value of the land
C.