With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a consumers power district unless he or she shall be a voter of such district or, if such district be subdivided for election purposes as provided in this chapter, of the subdivision of which he or she shall be a voter. No person shall be qualified to be a member of more than one such district board. (Emphasis added.) SDCL 49-36-1 further provides who is a “voter of such district” for purposes of a consumers power district election: After the selection of the original board of directors of a consumers power district as provided for in chapter 49-35, their successors shall be nominated and elected and shall take office as provided in this chapter. Qualifie nal and statutory provisions before disenfranchising a voter. See Bienert v. Yankton Sch. Dist., 63-3, 507 N.W.2d 88, 91 (S.D.1993) (<HOLDING>). Cf. Becker v. Pfeifer, 1999 SD 17, ¶ 22, 588

A: holding that representation by state officials that they have no present plan to enforce a statute does not divest plaintiffs of standing to challenge the statute because the states position could well change
B: holding that although the 1972 election had long since passed the case was not moot because the statute under review would apply to other candidates in the future
C: holding strict compliance with statutory scheme was properly followed and this court would not disenfranchise voters because election officials chose a specifically prescribed applicable statute over another statute to which they were not directed as urged by the plaintiff in that case
D: holding that election case was not moot after election because there is a reasonable expectation that the same complaining parties would be subject to that same action in the future
C.