With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to avoid LaSalle’s mortgage lien. In Indiana, as elsewhere, a recorded, “properly acknowledged” mortgage imparts constructive notice of its existence to subsequent bona fide purchasers (BFPs). See Bank of New York v. Nally, 820 N.E.2d 644, 648 (Ind.2005). Prior to the 2007 Amendment, a mortgage that was not entitled to be recorded because of a technical defect in the acknowledgment did not provide such notice. See Ind.Code § 32-21-2-3 (requiring that a notary public authenticate signature for grantors of mortgage); § 32-21-2-7 (now modified by § 32-21-4-1, at issue in the present case); Sandy Ridge Oil Co., Inc. v. Centerre Bank Nat’l Ass’n (In re Sandy Ridge Oil Co., Inc.), 510 N.E.2d 667, 669 (Ind.1987) (stating the general rule); In re Stubbs, 330 B.R. 717, 731 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.2005) (<HOLDING>), aff'd 2006 WL 2361814 (N.D.Ind.2006); Boldin

A: holding that plaintiff company could not monopolize name shredded wheat because it had shown only an association in consumers minds of the name with the company not that the terms primary significance to the consuming public was the producer and not the product
B: holding that information was not fatally defective because while defendants name did not appear in the charging part of the information it did clearly appear in the caption and in the verification of the charge by the district attorney
C: holding that failure of indictment to include the defendants name was not fatal because the original complaint that initiated the prosecution properly listed the defendants name and the record indieated that the defendant  knew what he was charged with and what facts the charge was based upon
D: holding that an acknowledgment was defective because it did not include the name of the person who appeared before a notary public
D.