With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 937, 942 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1215, 120 S.Ct. 2218, 147 L.Ed.2d 251 (2000). They are also signatories to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "New York Convention"), see id., which applies to "any commercial arbitral agreement" as long as it does not (1) arise between two United States citizens, and (2) involve property located in the United States, and (3) have any reasonable relationship with one or more foreign states. Jain v. de Mere, 51 F.3d 686, 689 (7th Cir.1995); see also 9 U.S.C. § 201 (New York Convention applies to "arbitral awards not considered as domestic awards in the State where their recognition and enforcement are sought"); Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., 126 F.3d 15, 19 (2d Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). Where the requirements of both the

A: holding that the commandant of the united states disciplinary barracks and the united states are identical parties
B: recognizing federal constitutional claim against the united states
C: holding that new york convention governed award rendered in the united states that arose out of dispute involving two nondomestic parties and one united states corporation
D: holding that the plaintiff must demonstrate that defendants contacts with the united states as a whole support the exercise of jurisdiction consistent with the constitution and laws of the united states
C.