With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". alleged that appellees each (1) “misrepresented then.- abilities and financial condition such that it was believed they would bring enormous skill, expertise, and personal and donated monies to the [FairTax Campaign] effort” and (2) fraudulently induced Hoag-land into signing the Operating Agreement. Hoagland further alleged that Bill convinced Hoagland to take a $3,000 monthly fee in lieu of the fee to which he was entitled under the Operating Agreement based on Bill’s representation that Hoagland would benefit more financially from taking the monthly fee than from taking the fee outlined in the Operating Agreement. We conclude Hoagland pleaded jurisdictional facts that appellees committed tor-tious acts — fraud and fraudulent inducement — in Texas. See Kelly, 301 S.W.3d at 659-60 (<HOLDING>); see also Horizon Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Blyn

A: holding that the burden is on the plaintiff to allege facts sufficient to establish jurisdiction
B: holding plaintiffs allegation that defendants committed torts in texas was sufficient to bring defendants under the longarm statute
C: holding plaintiff was required to allege defendants committed fraudulent acts in texas to satisfy his initial burden of pleading jurisdictional facts
D: holding that plaintiff bears the burden to timely allege facts supporting equitable tolling
C.