With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 251.5(b). Consideration of the alleged violation of Colo. 8.4(b) rests on different grounds. Colo. RPC 8.4(b) provides: It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: (b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects. Not only does Colo. RPC 8.4(b) require proof of a criminal act, it requires proof of the additional requirement that the criminal act so proven "reflect[s] adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects." The language of the rule recognizes that not all criminal acts are proscribed. People v. Anderson, No. 99PDJ083 (consolidated with 99PDJ066 and 99PDJ126) (Colo. PDJ July 21, 2000) 29 Colo. Law. 123, 126 (October 2000) 2000 Colo. Discipl. LEXIS 3 (<HOLDING>). Only those acts which by their nature reflect

A: holding the statutory scheme of two federal laws was not void for vagueness and did not violate equal protection or due process even though the defendants conduct violated both laws
B: holding that not all convictions of the criminal laws necessarily justify the conclusion that colo rpc 84b has also been violated
C: holding that a spouse is not necessarily an agent of the debtor
D: holding that under separation of powers the legislative department makes the laws the executive department carries the laws into effect and the judicial department interprets and declares the laws
B.