With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in those opinions did not provide consequences for the tribunals’ failure to timely carry out their duties. Finally, the tribunals, not the parties invoking the jurisdiction of the tribunals, caused the delay in the proceedings. The Board must file its application for permission to appeal within ten days from when the Commission files its disposition. Iowa Ct. R. 35.11(2). Here, a party, not the tribunal, caused the delay in proceedings by failing to meet this deadline. The rule states the consequence for failing to file an appeal within the required time is that the Commission’s decision becomes final. Id. r. 35.9. This language clearly evidences intent by this court to make the ten-day filing requirement mandatory, not directory. See Zick v. Haugh, 165 N.W.2d 836, 837 (Iowa 1969) (<HOLDING>). Once the ten-day period for seeking

A: holding that a lower court is bound by the decree of the appellate court and can only enter a judgment or decree in strict compliance with the appellate courts mandate
B: holding that exhaustion is mandatory and jurisdictional
C: holding rule pertaining to time for taking an appeal to supreme court from an order judgment or decree of the lower court is mandatory and jurisdictional
D: holding that this time requirement is mandatory and jurisdictional
C.