With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Cauthon was an insured under the policy at issue here, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. All concur. 1 . See section 537.065, RSMo 1994. 2 . Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). 3 . Gulf Ins. Co. v. Noble Broadcast, 936 S.W.2d 810, 813 (Mo. banc 1997). 4 . Id. at 813-14. 5 . Id. at 814. 6 . Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Republic Ins. Co., 941 S.W.2d 505, 508 (Mo. banc 1997). 7 . Id. 8 . Webster's Third New International Dictionary 794 (1966). 9 . Id. at 1567. 10 . Id. at 794. 11 . Id. 12 . Black’s Law Dictionary 569 (6th ed.1990) (internal citations omitted). 13 . Holm v. Mutual Serv. Cas. Co., 261 N.W.2d 598, 600 (Minn. 1977). 14 . Id. at 601. 15 . Id. at 602; see also Bouis v. Employers Liab. Assurance Corp., 160 So.2d 36 (La.Ct. App.1963) (<HOLDING>). 16 . See e.g., Young v. New Hampshire

A: holding chief of police an executive officer because a member of the executive branch and an officer
B: holding that a mayor although the executive officer may still have legislative functions
C: holding that statements made only to supervisor and chief by police officer were matters of public concern
D: holding the chief of police was an atwill employee because the parties agreed that the chief of police was an appointed officer and the citys charter stated that officers shall be appointed and may be removed by the mayor with consent of the council
A.