With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". there effectively told the grandmother she had no right to resist the search by claiming to have a warrant, while the DPS officer here correctly informed Valenzuela that Arizona law required hi “instinct with coercion” whether or not he actually possessed a valid warrant. See. id. at 549, 88 S.Ct. 1788 (“A search conducted in reliance upon a warrant cannot later be justified on the basis of consent if it turns out that the warrant was invalid.”); see also Lo-Ji Sales, 442 U.S. at 329, 99 S.Ct. 2319 (citing Bumper and holding that after a business’s agent was arrested and made aware of “the presumed authority” of a search warrant, his compliance with officers’ requests could not be considered free and voluntary consent to a search); State v. Medicine, 865 N.W.2d 492, 498 ¶ 13 (S.D.2015) (<HOLDING>). Consequently, whether the officer here

A: holding that qualified immunity applies only if an officer had arguable probable cause to arrest
B: holding that bumper applies whether an officer honestly represents authority or fabricates it
C: holding that a public officer has no discretion or authority to misinterpret the law
D: holding that in deciding whether officers are entitled to qualified immunity it is not only the evidence of clearly established law that is for the court but also whether a reasonable officer could have believed that his or her conduct was lawful in light of the information the officer had
B.