With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in their entirety. Defendant Carmen Lott shall recover taxable court cost[s] from Plaintiffs. On September 7, 1999, the Wilsons filed separate motions for new trial against Lott and Montgomery County. Then, on September 24, 1999, the Wilsons filed their notice of appeal stating their intention to appeal the “Final Judgment” dated August 5,1999. Although the notice of appeal references a judgment dated August 5,1999, notwithstanding Rule 301 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure that only one final judgment shall be rendered, the clerk’s record contains two orders dated August 5, 1999. See Fisher v. Yates, 953 S.W.2d 370, 374 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1997), pet. denied, 988 S.W.2d 730 (Tex.1998); see also Wang v. Hsu, 899 S.W.2d 409, 411 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1995, writ denied) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, because the clerk’s record contains

A: holding that order awarding attorney fees in amount to be determined at later date was not final appealable order
B: holding such denial to be an immediately appealable collateral final order
C: holding an order imposing sex offender registration after the juvenile courts initial disposition can be a final appealable order
D: holding that there can be only one final appealable order
D.