With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Daniel Ray Buie appeals the district court’s order granting the government’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion and reducing his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the Amended Judgment. See United States v. Davis, 679 F.3d 190, 197 (4th Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>). We deny Buie’s motion for appointment of

A: holding that district court did not have authority to depart any further below the statutory minimum after granting the  3553e motion and therefore need not consider the  3553a factors
B: holding that sentence is reasonable when the district court properly addresses sentencing factors of  3553a
C: holding that district court may consider 18 usc  3553a 2012 factors when deciding the extent of a sentence reduction after granting a rule 35b motion
D: holding that rule 35bs time limit is absolute regardless of whether the motion for reduction of sentence is framed under rule 35b or 18 usc  3651
C.