With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of Resident Owners Inc. did not file a notice of appeal with our court. Therefore, this issue is moot because we cannot exercise jurisdiction over them. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the trial court. CONCLUSION For the above stated reasons, the decisions of the trial court are AFFIRMED. SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur. 1 . However, we note the current version prohibits "actions to recover damages based upon or arising out of the defective or unsafe condition of an improvement to real property” that arise more than eight years after substantial completion of the improvement. S.C.Code Ann. § 15-3-640 (Supp.2009). 2 . Any res judicata argument in relation to Judge Few's order is not preserved. Hopkins v. Harrell, 352 S.C. 517, 522 n. 1, 574 S.E.2d 747, 750 n. 1 (Ct.App.2002) (<HOLDING>). 3 . Several copies of the record on appeal

A: holding an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be preserved for review
B: holding issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review
C: holding that issues not raised to or ruled upon by the lower court are not preserved for appellate review
D: holding issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge to be preserved for appellate review
A.