With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and that “[i]t is simply best just to go to bed when that occurs.” JA 462 Getter from Mitchell K. Schwaber, M.D., to Kenneth A. Miller dated October 28, 2002). In the context of this case and this episodic disease, the ALJ has failed adequately to explain why Dr. Schwaber’s opinion (if not the opinions of other treating doctors) should not be treated as a valid medical opinion regarding “the frequency and duration of the disease’s exacerbations” rather than an opinion “on issues reserved to the Commissioner.” See Groskreutz v. Barnhart, 108 Fed.Appx. 412 (7th Cir.2004) (“The ALJ erroneously disregarded [a physician’s] opinion regarding how much weight [the applicant] could lift and how many days of work she may have to miss.”); Alexander v. Barnhart, 74 Fed.Appx. 23 (10th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>); Abendroth v. Barnhart, 26 Fed.Appx. 580 (7th

A: holding that where a treating physicians opinion is contradicted by a consulting physician the alj must explain on the record the reasons for rejecting the opinion of the treating physician
B: holding that remand was not required and that the aljs failure to mention treating physicians opinion was harmless error because the alj adopted the treating physicians recommendations
C: holding that the alj erred by failing to mention the contrary opinion of a treating physician
D: recognizing that the alj erred in disregarding a treating physicians opinion that a disabilitybenefits applicant might miss a day a week of work and need to lie down twice a day
D.