With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ted unwanted fondling and rubbing of plaintiffs breasts and buttocks and unwanted kissing on the cheek over a seven-month period, despite her protests on every occasion, was sufficiently severe or pervasive). In these cases, the pervasiveness of the alleged conduct was sufficient to alter the terms or conditions of the plaintiffs employment. By contrast, Paul’s sexual harassment claim relies exclusively on a single confrontation with Barattini, which, according to her brief, lasted a total of approximately a minute and a half. We therefore agree with the district court’s finding that Barattini’s alleged conduct was clearly not pervasive, and are left with the task of assessing its severity. This circuit’s case law reveals that isolated incidents may form the , 328 (5th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); Derouen v. Carquest Auto Parts, Inc., No.

A: holding that sexually suggestive comments slapping plaintiff on the behind with a newspaper grabbing or brushing up against plaintiffs breasts and behind and attempting to kiss plaintiff did not qualify as severe
B: holding that extending immunity to contractors under the act would not further the purpose behind the act
C: holding that three sexually suggestive comments over a three month period were not frequent enough nor severe enough to be unreasonable interference with the plaintiffs work environment
D: holding that conduct was not sufficiently severe or pervasive where over twoweek period a coworker stood behind the plaintiff to create physical contact surreptitiously looked at the plaintiffs genitals in the restroom and engaged in unwanted touching
A.