With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". opinion was conclusory or inconsistent with the doctor’s own medical records.” Id. at 1240-41. Where a treating physician expresses uncertainty as to his own medical findings, the ALJ has no obligation to defer to his opinion. Edwards v. Sullivan, 937 F.2d 580, 584 (11th Cir.1991). Further, a treating physician’s opinion is not entitled to considerable weight if it conflicts with the claimant’s own testimony regarding her daily activities. Id. at 1241. Where the medical record contained a retrospective diagnosis, that is, a physician’s post-insured-date opinion that the claimant suffered a disabling condition prior to the insured date, we affirm only when that opinion was consistent with pre-insureddate medical evidence. See Payne v. Weinberger, 480 F.2d 1006, 1007-08 (5th Cir.1973) (<HOLDING>); Estok v. Apfel, 152 F.3d 636, 640 (7th

A: holding that the alj erred in determining that the claimant was disabled when a retrospective diagnosis along with all other medical evidence supported a finding of disability
B: holding that retroactive award of benefits proper remedy where district court made finding that claimant was disabled
C: holding in a similar case that alj erred in failing to consider retrospective diagnosis indicating that ptsd existed from time of discharge from army
D: holding that no medical advisor was necessary when the evidence did not indicate that the claimant was disabled before his dli
A.