With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (10th Cir. 2012) (concluding that a defendant lacked standing to challenge constitutionality of mandatory minimum because the “Actual sentence of eighty-seven months was not affected by the statutorily prescribed mandatory minimum” but was instead based on "the § 3553(a) factors and the Guidelines"),. 56 . See United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373, 378 (3d Cir. 1978). 57 . See id. at 375-76, 380-81. 58 . Id. at 381. 59 . United States v. Combs, 827 F.3d 790, 795 (8th Cir. 2016). 60 . See United States v. Fattah, 858 F.3d 801, 813 (3d Cir. 2017) (citing Twigg for the proposition that ''[t]his Court has granted relief on a claim of outrageous government misconduct only once”). 61 . 826 F.3d 683, 694-95 (3d Cir. 2016); see also United States v. Mohamud, 843 F.3d 420, 435 (9th Cir. 2016) (<HOLDING>). 62 . See United States v. Sed, 601 F.3d 224,

A: holding that severe recklessness satisfies scienter requirement citation omitted
B: recognizing that dismissal is warranted only in extreme cases citation omitted
C: holding that defendants bear the burden of showing that the challenged act was objectively reasonable citation omitted
D: recognizing that a plaintiff may be able to establish that the statute is unconstitutional by showing that the statute lacks any plainly legitimate sweep  citation omitted
B.