With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (Alaska 1980)). 34 . Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric Inst., 208 P.3d 168, 178 (Alaska 2009) (citing Vezey v. Green, 171 P.3d 1125, 1128 (Alaska 2007)). 35 . Id. 36 . State, Dep't of Rev., Child Support Enforcement Div. ex rel. P.M. v. Mitchell, 930 P.2d 1284, 1288 n. 8 (Alaska 1997) (failure to brief an issue on appeal waives the issue). 37 . Beal v. Beal, 209 P.3d 1012, 1023 (Alaska 2009) (quoting Berry v. Berry, 978 P.2d 93, 96 (Alaska 1999)). 38 . Id. 39 . Ramsey v. Ramsey, 834 P.2d 807, 809 (Alaska 1992). 40 . Maryna lacked access to the house from the separation on December 14, 2010, until June 17, 2011, a period of roughly six months. Kenneth lacked access to the house from June 17, 2011 until the divorce decree was entered on December 27, 2011. 41 . See Beal, 209 P.3d at 1016, 1024 (<HOLDING>). 42 . Fortson v. Fortson, 131 P.3d 451, 459

A: holding that the award of a full dollar fordollar credit to husband for reduction of the mortgage principal when he did not live in the marital residence for the duration of the postseparation period was not clearly unjust
B: holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to award a spouse all of the divisible property attributable to his postseparation payments which reduced marital debt
C: holding that the objective of maintaining the marital residence for the best interest of the minor children is properly accomplished not by granting exclusive ownership of the home to the wife but by granting the wife exclusive use and possession of the marital residence during the minority of the children
D: holding that severance pay received postseparation was not marital property as the condition to receive the pay was related to the sale of the corporation not to husbands work during his marriage
A.