With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". beneficiary status, a contract need not afford a third-party the “direct right to compensation or the power to enforce that right against the promisor.” Glass v. United States, 258 F.3d 1349, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2001); see also Montana v. United States, 124 F.3d 1269, 1273 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (same); Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d 1254, 1260 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (“[T]hird-party beneficiary status is not reserved [solely] for those parties who benefit expressly under a given contract.”). Instead, third-party beneficiary status m n ‘exceptional privilege’ and, to avail oneself of this ... privilege, a party must ‘at least show that [the contract] was intended for his direct benefit.’” FDIC, 342 F.3d at 1319 (quoting Glass, 258 F.3d at 1354); see also Flexfab, 424 F.3d at 1259 (<HOLDING>). And, that privilege “should not be granted

A: holding that person who is not party to contract does not have standing to challenge contract
B: holding that an incidental beneficiary does not have standing to sue for breach of a contract
C: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue
D: holding that standing to sue under a contract requires plaintiff to be in privity or be an intended thirdparty beneficiary
B.