With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 81 did not have a traffic control device posted indicating any restrictions or prohibitions for travel. (Notes of testimony, 10/6/05 at 11-12; trial court opinion, 12/14/05 at 3 n. 4.) Without such a posting, appellant claims the trial court erred in finding her guilty of the violation when she was not properly afforded notice of the restriction. ¶ 5 The parties have not cited and we have been unable to discover any legislative history regarding the statute in question. We are thus presented with a preliminary issue of statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law over which we exercise plenary review. Commonwealth v. Magliocco, 584 Pa. 244, 247, 883 A.2d 479, 481 (2005); see also Commonwealth v. Dellisanti, 583 Pa. 106, 112 n. 8, 876 A.2d 366, 369 n. 8 (2005) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 6 In interpreting a statute, we are guided

A: holding that this court may address an issue not ruled on by the trial court if it presents a question of law and all the facts necessary for its resolution have been presented
B: recognizing that what this court had treated as an issue of sufficiency actually presented a question of statutory construction
C: holding that statutory construction is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
D: holding that appellate court may only review issues actually presented to and considered by the trial court
B.