With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that damages for loss of use may be recovered when a vehicle is totally destroyed. Because a vehicle is a complete loss if stolen, a stolen vehicle should be treated in the same way as a completely destroyed vehicle for purposes of loss of use damages. However, recovery for loss of use damages must be limited to a period of time reasonably necessary for securing a replacement. Nashban Barrel & Container Co. v. G.G. Parsons Trucking Co., 49 Wis.2d 591, 182 N.W.2d 448, 454 (1971); Cecere v. Harquail, 104 A.D.2d 6, 481 N.Y.S.2d 533 (1984); Remedies, supra § 5.11, at 385. Here, United indicated it could not afford to purchase a replacement. But, a plaintiffs recovery should not be premised on his or her actual ability to purchase a replacement. See, e.g., New York Cent., 218 N.E.2d at 377 (<HOLDING>); Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Boren, 202 Ky.

A: holding that where the owner of a tractor knew immediately after the accident that the tractor was a total loss damages for loss of use were not recoverable beyond a reasonable time limited to 30 days notwithstanding the owners financial inability to replace the property for eight months
B: holding that a plaintiff who did not replace a destroyed tractortrailer due to lack of funds and failure to find a suitable replacement could recover for loss of use of the vehicle limited to a reasonable time
C: holding that plaintiff whose truck was demolished in an accident could not recover lost profits unless he could show that he could not obtain a suitable substitute vehicle
D: holding plaintiff who did not purchase an available replacement because of financial inability could nonetheless recover for loss of use of a totally destroyed car
B.