With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". her a back massage. T.B. testified that M.W. was flirting with appellant, and he noticed appellant kissing M.W. at the pool. Moreover, K.K., who testified for the state, claimed that M.W. climbed over the seat of S.C.’s truck so that she could sit next to appellant during the ride to Eddy’s Resort. K.K. also agreed that such conduct constituted “flirting.” Both D.C. and K.K. testified that they noticed the sexual activity between appellant and M.W. at the hotel, but declined to interfere because, at the time, they thought the activity was consensual. In fact, both K.K. and D.C. testified that they heard M.W. moan, and the moaning seems to be more consistent with consensual sexual activity rather than a situation where M.W. was physically helpless. The record further reflects that 7) (<HOLDING>), review denied (Minn. Dec. 22,1987). Here,

A: holding that the plaintiffs evidence of pretext which included but was not limited to her supervisors statement that she had enough of the plaintiff going to her supervisor about her was not sufficient to preclude summary judgment
B: holding tenyearolds unequivocal testimony about her father touching her was sufficient to convict him for seconddegree criminal sexual conduct despite his claim that the story was fabricated
C: holding that because petitioner was denied a reasonable opportunity to explain what the ij perceived as an inconsistency in her testimonythe ijs doubt about the veracity of her story  cannot serve as a basis for the denial of asylum
D: holding that trial court properly terminated fathers obligation to support his seventeenyearold daughter who refused to live with father but instead chose to reside in her own apartment after her mother moved out of state where daughter offered no justifiable reason for not living with her father daughter only contended that her stepmother was too neat for her and that she wanted to live closer to her friends
B.