With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Id. 11 47. 21 . See id. ¶ 49. 22 . See id. ¶ 50. 23 . Id. ¶ 58. 24 . See id. ¶ 59. 25 . See id. ¶ 60. 26 . See id. ¶ 62. 27 . See id. 28 . See id. ¶ 331 (2d Cir.2002)); In re Alstom SA Sec. Litig., 406 F.Supp.2d 433 (S.D.N.Y.2005) ("[OJmission is actionable when the failure to disclose renders a statement misleading.”). 83 . Novak, 216 F.3d at 309 (citation omitted). 84 . Id. (citation omitted). ir.2001) (describing "[i]nsufficient motives” as including "(1) the desire for the corporation to appear profitable and (2) the desire to keep stock prices high to increase officer compensation”) (quotations omitted). 93 . Stevelman v. Alias Res. Inc., 174 F.3d 79, 84-85 (2d Cir.1999). 94 . Kalnit, 264 F.3d at 139. Accord In re Openwave Sys. Sec. Litig., 528 F.Supp.2d 236, 250 (S.D.N.Y.2007) (<HOLDING>); Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726

A: holding that defendants stock options are concrete and personal because they represent a species of compensation different from the one ordinarily accumulated by corporate officers and directors
B: holding that damages resulting from directors misconduct destroying the value of the corporate stock does not qualify as a direct or personal injuiy to a shareholder and will not support a tort action
C: holding under delaware law that corporate officers owe the same fiduciary duties as directors
D: holding that directors and officers are fiduciaries
A.