With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 697 (1960), for the proposition that an individual has a justifiable expectation of privacy in a friend’s apartment. Id. at 352 n. 11, 88 S.Ct. 507. In Jones, the defendant who had a key to his friend’s apartment, where he kept a suit and shirt and may have slept a night in the past but not recently, was found to have standing to maintain a motion to suppress the fruits of a search of the apartment in part because “anyone legitimately on premises where a search occurs may challenge its legality .... ” 362 U.S. at 259, 267, 80 S.Ct. 725. Katz was decided in 1967, and was considered by Congress and the President when Title III was enacted in 1968. See, e.g., S.Rep. No. 90-1097 (1968), reprinted in 1968 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2112, 2153. Since Katz was decided, Justice Harlan’s tw 1 (1st Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). In any event, for the purpose of defining the

A: holding that captain has reasonable expectation of privacy in all areas of his ship
B: holding that society recognizes a reasonable expectation of privacy
C: holding that defendants had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the common areas of an apartment building
D: holding common areas of a storage facility not entitled to reasonable expectation of privacy because any tenant could invite anyone in
A.