With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". resident spouse to submit to an EUO, at Citizen’s request. This Court has previously held that an insured’s refusal to submit to an EUO relieves the insurer of its obligation to pay under the policy. Stringer v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 622 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); see also Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co., 660 So.2d 300, 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (stating that “[a]n insured’s refusal to comply with a demand for an examination under oath is a willful and material breach of an insurance contract which precludes the insured from recovery under the policy”). Although Alexandra assigned her right to benefits under the policy, she did not assign to Haim her obligations under the policy. Marlin Diagnostics v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 897 So.2d 469, 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (<HOLDING>); Shaw v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 37 So.3d

A: holding a personal profit exclusion applicable to an insured corporation where the purpose of the exclusion was to exclude coverage when the insured received profits to which the insured was not legally entitled
B: holding that where the insurer retains an attorney to represent the insured pursuant to an insurance policy the attorney acts in the capacity of an independent contractor for the insured
C: holding the obligation to attend an euo does not shift to the provider merely because the insured assigned her benefits
D: holding as unambiguous under iowa law the insurance policys exclusion of coverage to any obligation of the insured to indemnify another because of damages arising out of  a bodily injury to any employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of his employment by the insured
C.