With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the lost volume theory is that the seller would have generated a second sale irrespective of the buyer’s breach such that it follows that the lost volume seller cannot possibly mitigate damages). Further, we find the legislature’s adoption of S.C.Code Ann. § 36-2A-528(2) is consistent with adoption of the lost volume seller doctrine. Section 36-2A-528(2) (dealing with leased goods) tracks the language of S.C.Code Ann. § 36-2-708(2) (seller’s damages for sales). Section 36-2-708 clearly tracks the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code section (UCC § 2-708(2)) upon which the lost volume seller doctrine is premised. See generally, Jerald B. Holisky, Finding the Lost Volume Seller; Tivo Independent Sales Deserve Two Profits Under Illinois Laiv, 22 J. Marshall L.Rev. 363 (Winter 1988) (<HOLDING>); Jonathan J. Lautt, Contract Law: A Clean

A: recognizing that the lost profit seller doctrine emanates from ucc 27082
B: recognizing separation of powers doctrine
C: recognizing that the artful pleading doctrine in practice is subsumed by the complete preemption doctrine
D: recognizing doctrine
A.