With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". not made part of the record. 9 . 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). 10 . 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(2). 11 . 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(4). 12 . 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(6). 13 . Section 362(c)(3) provides that if a bankruptcy case is filed by an individual who had a prior bankruptcy case dismissed (other than a dismissal under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)) within the preceding one year period, the automatic stay terminates on the 30th day after the filing of the later case, unless the stay is extended after notice and hearing. In this case, § 362(c)(3) was applicable. After notice and hearing, however, the court entered an order extending the automatic stay. See Docket Entry No. 17. 14 . For ease of reference, I will refer to such an institution as a "university.” 15 .See, e. g., In re Merchant, 958 F.2d 738, 741 (6th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); In re Hernandez, 2005 WL 1000059, at *1

A: holding that university violated automatic stay by withholding chapter 13 debtors student transcript but that such action at bar did not rise to the level of contempt
B: holding judgment in violation of automatic stay void
C: holding that refusal to provide chapter 7 debtor transcript because of default on student loan was a violation of the automatic stay based on the plain language of 11 usc  362
D: holding that although the automatic stay only applies to proceedings against the debtor  counterclaims seeking affirmative relief against a debtor implicate the automatic stay
C.