With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1205, 89 L.Ed.2d 318 (1986). See generally State of Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V Testbank, 752 F.2d 1019, 1031-32 (5th Cir.1985) (en banc) ("It is well-settled that the invocation of federal admiralty jurisdiction results in the application of federal admiralty law rather than state law.”), cert. denied sub nom. White v. M/V Testbank, 477 U.S. 903, 106 S.Ct. 3271, 91 L.Ed.2d 562 (1986). 6 . Evich v. Morris (Evich II), 819 F.2d 256, 257-58 (9th Cir.1987) (general maritime survival damages are not to be supplemented by state law), after remand from Evich I, 759 F.2d 1432, 1434 (9th Cir.1985) (survival damages are recoverable under general maritime law), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 261, 98 L.Ed.2d 218 (1987); see Law v. Sea Drilling Corp., 523 F.2d 793, 795, 798 (5th Cir.1975) (<HOLDING>), followed in Azzopardi v. Ocean Drilling &

A: holding that one year warranty was not an exclusive remedy for defective construction where the contract did not so state
B: holding that dohsa did not preclude an award for survival damages under moragne and adding that no longer does one need a state remedy
C: holding a court may not award punitive damages
D: holding that in the absence of an adequate state remedy one whose constitutional rights are violated has a direct claim against the state under the state constitution
B.