With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". dual standards for the “based on sex” showing required in male and female same-sex harassment cases and concluding that courts may look to cases that involve male same-sex harassment to determine whether a female, same-sex harassment plaintiff has made the showing required to create a jury question upon the “because of sex” requirement). iii. Robertson’s “same-sex harassment” allegations Robertson contends, the defendants apparently ultimately concede, and I specifically conclude that Robertson’s factual allegations in her Petition are more than sufficient to give facial plausibility to her claim that Stephan was motivated by same-sex desire. See Richter, 686 F.3d at 850 (stating the “plausibility” standard for stating a claim upon which relief can be granted); Smith, 622 F.3d at 907 (<HOLDING>). The pertinent allegations of same-sex desire

A: recognizing that a plaintiff can demonstrate that samesex harassment is because of sex by showing that the conduct was motivated by the coworkers sexual desire for persons of the same sex
B: holding that a plaintiff claiming sexual harassment must always prove that the conduct at issue  actually constituted discrimination  because of  sex  emphasis added
C: holding that a charge that alleged discrimination on the basis of sex did not support a complaint for hostile environment sexual harassment
D: holding that conduct that a jury finds to be based on sex and not motivated by nondiscriminatory reasons cannot later be found by a district court to lack an intent to discriminate on the basis of sex
A.