With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". McAlister, Slycord, and Gavronsky. He would sell at roughly the same rate, between $1000 and $1200 per ounce, and usually sold at least an ounce at a time, and often up to four ounces at once. In one month, Gavronsky alone completed six to eight purchases of methamphetamine, each time obtaining one or two ounces of methamphetamine for resale. Testimony also established that Slycord’s standard purchase from Oleson was an ounce of marijuana and four ounces of methamphetamine. Considering the amount of contraband in these transactions in combination with the testimony of frequent standardized sales, we conclude there is sufficient evidence to support an inference that Oleson was part of the conspiracy to distribute narcotics. See United States v. Trotter, 889 F.2d 153, 156 (8th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). To convict Oleson of possession of

A: holding anonymous tip that someone at the residence was dealing drugs did not amount to anything the tip was never substantiated and none of the occupants were ever charged with drug dealing
B: holding extraordinary circumstances when considering repeated affirmative misrepresentations combined with plaintiffs diligence over an extended course of dealing
C: holding even small amount of drugs may support inference of dealing when combined with other evidence consistent with distribution
D: holding other than location of the drugs state presented evidence establishing direct connection between drugs and accused thereby creating inference of control
C.