With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Judge. The defendant, Eddie Franklin, appeals the denial o A 2006)(<HOLDING>); Eloisaint v. State, 868 So.2d 680 (Fla. 3d

A: holding that claims raised on direct appeal are procedurally barred from consideration in a rule 3850 motion
B: holding that defendants 3850 motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred as successive where the defendants current rule 3850 motion is one that could have or should have been raised in his first rule 3850 motion
C: holding that rule 3850 motion was not time barred where the order did not place any time limitation on when the defendant would refile his rule 3850 motion
D: holding that postconviction court could not deny a refilled rule 3850 motion as untimely when postconviction court did not set a filing deadline in dismissing defendants first rule 3850 motion without prejudice to refiling
B.