With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 235, 127 P.3d 138, 141 (2005); Am. Gen. Home Equity, Inc. v. Kestel, 253 S.W.3d 543, 547 n. 2 (Ky.2008); Commonwealth v. Philip Morris Inc., 448 Mass. 836, 864 N.E.2d 505, 511 (2007); Banks v. City Fin. Co., 825 So.2d 642, 647-48 (Miss.2002); State ex rel. Bruning v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 275 Neb. 310, 746 N.W.2d 672, 678 (2008); Edward Family Ltd. v. Brown, 140 N.M. 104, 140 P.3d 525, 529 (Ct.App.2006); Ass'n of Unit Owners of Bridgeview Condos. v. Dunning, 187 Or.App. 595, 69 P.3d 788, 801 (2003); Powell v. Cannon, 179 P.3d 799, 806-7 (Utah 2008); Scherer v. Schuler Custom Homes Constr., Inc., 98 P.3d 159, 162 (Wyo.2004). 14 . Perry Homes v. Cull, 258 S.W.3d 580, 586 n. 13 (Tex.2008). 15 . 193 S.W.3d 897, 898 (Tex.2006); see also Chambers v. O'Quinn, 242 S.W.3d 30, 32 (Tex.2007) (<HOLDING>). 16 . Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191,

A: holding plaintiff waived right to arbitration by not simultaneously requesting a stay and an order of arbitration at the time of the complaint
B: holding denial of mandamus challenging arbitration order did not bar appeal of that order after arbitration was completed
C: holding that an order remanding an arbitration award is not a final appealable order when the order does not also vacate the arbitration award
D: holding that completed arbitration pending appeal mooted district courts order directing arbitration
B.