With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a reasonable person in her circumstances would fear persecution if returned to her native country. Gao v. Ashcroft, 299 F.3d 266, 272 (3d Cir.2002); Elnager v. INS, 930 F.2d 784, 786 (9th Cir. 1991). The applicant must show “a subjective fear of persecution that is supported by objective evidence that persecution is a reasonable possibility.” Abdulrahman v. Ashcroft, 330 F.3d 587, 592 (3d Cir.2003) (quoting Chang v. INS, 119 F.3d 1055, 1066 (3d Cir.1997)). Whether an applicant has demonstrated a well-founded fear of future persecution and qualifies for asylum, withholding of removal, or relief under CAT, is generally a factual determination, which this court will review under the substantial evidence standard. Shardar v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 318, 323 (3d Cir.2004); Dia, 353 F.3d at 239 (<HOLDING>); Gao, 299 F.3d at 272; Abdille v. Ashcroft,

A: holding that if a reasonable fact finder could make a particular finding on the administrative record then the finding is supported by substantial evidence
B: holding that the district courts finding of no discrimination under title vii was not clearly erroneous because the finding was supported by the record
C: holding that a finding of fact is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole if it would have been possible for a reasonable jury to reach the boards conclusion
D: holding that the district courts finding of no discrimination was not clearly erroneous because the finding was supported by the record
A.