With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the opportunity to send the message to trial courts and litigants that litigants are not “entitled carte blanche to irrelevant discovery.” Allstate, 655 So.2d at 95. In the present ease, the trial court required production of income tax returns by the defendanVcounterclaimant in a case involving claims for accounting, fraud, breach of contract, constructive trusts and recision of a deed, among other things. While it cannot be determined with any certainty at this point whether the tax returns will be admissible, or whether their production will lead to admissible evidence, the harm that might result from production of this information is indistinguishable from the harm which would have resulted from production of the financial information involved in Martin-Johnson, 509 So.2d at 1099 (<HOLDING>). And, as we noted earlier, Martin-Johnson was

A: holding that discovery of financial information was not in and of itself the type of irreparable harm necessary for certiorari review
B: holding that the threat of irreparable harm must be immediate
C: holding in a similar case that certiorari was the proper vehicle for review
D: holding that a party cannot demonstrate the presence or absence of irreparable harm based on the potential financial abilities of a nonparty
A.