With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 865 F.2d 592 (3d Cir.1989). 52 . We nonetheless share the hope of the court in Davis that medical science will soon progress to the point that "exclusions on a case by case basis will be the only permissible procedure; or, hopefully, methods of control may become so exact that insulin-dependent diabetics will present no risk of ever having a severe hypoglycemic episode.” 692 F.Supp. at 520. But, as Chandler’s two severe hypoglycemic reactions while employed by the City amply demonstrate, it has not yet reached that point. 53 . Collier v. City of Dallas, No. 86-1010, slip op. at 3 (5th Cir. August 19, 1986) (unpublished). 54 . Chiari, 920 F.2d at 315. 55 . Arline, 480 U.S. at 287 n. 16, 107 S.Ct. at 1131 n. 16. 56 . Cf. Wood v. Omaha School Dist., 985 F.2d 437, 438-39 (8th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). 57 . Chiari, 920 F.2d at 315; Wood v. Omaha

A: holding that type ii non insulin dependent diabetic plaintiffs raised a genuine issue of material fact by presenting evidence regarding how they could readily monitor their blood sugar levels and maintain them at proper levels during work so as to reduce or eliminate the risk of a hypoglycemic reaction while driving
B: holding that evidence of misconduct or a deficient work performance record precluded the plaintiff from establishing a genuine issue of material fact such that a reasonable juror could find for the plaintiff
C: holding that dispute regarding material fact is genuine if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party
D: holding that there was a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment
A.