With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bobby Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 287 (4th Cir.2013) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Blewett, 746 F.3d 647, 650,

A: holding that  3582c2 does not provide means to apply fair sentencing act fsa minimums to defendants sentenced before fsas effective date
B: holding that although probation statute was repealed by sentencing reform act old provision continued to apply to offenses which occurred before effective date of act nov 1 1987
C: holding that  3582c2 does not authorize a resentencing but merely provides for a sentence reduction within the bounds established by the sentencing commission and that booker does not apply to  3582c2 proceedings
D: holding that the statute does not apply retroactively to claims accruing prior to the effective date
A.