With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". See Pl.'s Opp'n to Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss ("Pl.'s Opp'n”), p. 20. However, as to all of the personally-sued defendants, Plaintiff's complaint fails to allege facts that, if true, state a plausible claim that Defendants violated any property interest in employment. See Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. at 1940-41. Plaintiff's allegations strictly relate to the breach of confidentiality caused by the release of his deposition testimony, not to the loss of any employment interest. Compl. ¶ 68 (“[Defendants] unconstitutionally deprive[d] Plaintiff of his unambiguous entitlement to confidentiality under the [CAA].”) 4 . Defendants also have construed plaintiff's argument as one contending that defendants violated plaintiff's substantive due process rights, specifically, his right to privacy. See (en banc) (<HOLDING>). 7 .The CAA incorporates several provisions of

A: recognizing a bivens remedy for undocumented immigrants who were subjects of a raid by federal immigration officials reasoning that if a bivens remedy were precluded the present plaintiffs would have no forum in which to seek a remedy for the defendants alleged constitutional violations
B: recognizing the civil service reform act as a special factor precluding a bivens remedy
C: holding the privacy act to constitute a special factor precluding a bivens remedy
D: holding that in a bivens action service upon employee in his official capacity does not amount to service in his individual capacity
B.