With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and probative evidence of record. Al Najjar, 257 F.3d at 1284. This standard is “highly deferential.” The BIA’s decision can be reversed only “if the evidence compels a reasonable fact finder to find otherwise.” Kueviakoe, 567 F.3d at 1304 (quotation omitted); Al Najjar, 257 F.3d at 1284. Under this test, we “view the record evidence in the light most favorable to the agency’s decision and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of that decision.” Adefemi v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 1022, 1027 (11th Cir.2004) (en banc). The fact that evidence in the record may also support a conclusion contrary to the administrative findings is not enough to justify a reversal. (Id.). Adverse credibility determinations must be made explicitly. See Yang v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 418 F.3d 1198, 1201 (11th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). In asylum applications filed on or after May

A: holding the wcjs credibility determinations precluded any meaningful appellate review because the court had to imagine why the wcj made such credibility determinations
B: holding that we review adverse credibility determinations for substantial evidence
C: holding that credibility determinations are for the jury
D: holding that the ij must make clean determinations of credibility
D.