With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". States v. Kragness, 830 F.2d 842, 864 (8th Cir.1987) (citations omitted); see also United States v. Truglio, 731 F.2d 1123, 1129 (4th Cir.1984); United States v. Sutton, 700 F.2d 1078, 1081 (6th Cir.1983), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Burgos, 94 F.3d 849, 861-62 (4th Cir.1996); United States v. Rone, 598 F.2d 564, 571 (9th Cir.1979). We likewise see nothing in our ongoing-criminal-conduct statute that suggests our e last issue Reed raises is that the district court erred in concluding there was substantial evidence corroborating two accomplices’ testimony pertaining to his possession and drug tax stamp charges. We decline to address this issue because Reed failed to properly preserve the issue for our review. See State v. McCright, 569 N.W.2d 605, 607 (Iowa 1997) (<HOLDING>). V. Disposition. In sum, we conclude that Iowa

A: holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered
B: holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal
C: holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
D: holding that issues not raised before the district court cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal
D.