With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". somebody whose character may or may not be into evidence,” this argument appears to have been made in conjunction with his assertion that the statement regarding his sexual orientation was inadmissible. The trial court ultimately agreed with the defense on the sexual orientation issue, and the alleged statement that Caldwell was gay was not admitted into evidence. Because the argument raised on appeal does not appear to have been specifically raised below, it may not be preserved on appeal. See State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 694 (2003) (noting “[a] party need not use the exact name of a legal doctrine in order to preserve it, but it must be clear that the argument has been presented on that ground”); State v. Haselden, 353 S.C. 190, 196, 577 S.E.2d 445, 448 (2003) (<HOLDING>). Assuming arguendo the argument as to

A: holding that the defendant may not state one ground at trial and another on appeal
B: holding an issue not preserved when one ground is raised to the trial court and another ground is raised on appeal
C: holding party may not argue one ground at trial and another on appeal where appellant did not object to testimony at trial on the grounds raised on appeal that it was improper character evidence but objected only on the basis of relevancy issue was not preserved for review
D: holding to preserve an issue for appellate review the issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by trial court and a party may not argue one ground for objection at trial and another ground on appeal
C.