With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (Alaska 1979); Judd v. State, 482 P.2d 273, 276-78 (Alaska 1971); State v. Lamb, 649 P.2d 971, 972 (Alaska App.1982). The municipality concludes that this result is consistent with current federal law as articulated in Johnson and directly supported by the United States Supreme Court’s treatment of analogous decisions granting a right to counsel at pretrial proceedings. See Adams v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 278, 92 S.Ct. 916, 31 L.Ed.2d 202 (1972) (plurality opinion); Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 90 S.Ct. 1999, 26 L.Ed.2d 387 (1970) (case announcing a constitutional right to appointed counsel at preliminary hearings only applicable to preliminary hearings conducted after the date of the decision); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 301, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 1972, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, 1205-06 (1967) (<HOLDING>). Yerrington counters that the supreme court’s

A: holding that decision of this court unless or until overturned by this court en banc the  federal circuit or the supreme court is a decision of the court on the date it is issued any rulings interpretations or conclusions of law contained in such a decision are authoritative and binding as of the date the decision is issued and are to be considered and when applicable are to be followed by va agencies of original jurisdiction the board and the secretary in adjudicating and resolving claims
B: holding a decision establishing a right to counsel at a lineup would only be applied to lineups taking place after the date of the decision
C: holding that evidence contrary to an administrators decision does not make the decision arbitrary and capricious so long as a reasonable basis appears for the decision
D: holding that the decision to allow attorney fees rests with the trial judge and that decision may only be reversed for an abuse of discretion
B.