With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". damages); Martinez v. St Joseph Hosp. & Nursing Home of Del Norte, Inc., 878 P.2d 13, 15 (Colo.App.1993) (jury apportionment of economic and non-economic proceeds in a tort case involving workers’ compensation benefits). Of course, the trial court itself would determine the appropriate amounts for economic, non-economic and loss of consortium as the trier of fact if a jury were not requested. Trial courts also have jurisdiction to accept settlements and to give effect to them. See Bruce W. Higley Defined Benefit Annuity Plan v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., 920 P.2d 884, 891 (Colo.App.1996) (recognizing that a trial court approval of a settlement will not be overturned absent a strong showing of clear abuse of discretion); Mulei v. Jet Courier Serv., Inc., 860 P.2d 569, 571 (Colo.App.1993) (<HOLDING>). We see no reason why the jurisdiction of the

A: holding that although the trial court had dismissed the cause with prejudice it retained jurisdiction to give effect to the settlement order
B: holding appealable a case dismissed in effect by the district courts order
C: holding that the circuit courts order concluding that it was without jurisdiction to entertain a complaint because the case had been dismissed without prejudice constituted a final order because all other claims either had been refiled or dismissed with prejudice
D: holding that the appellate court had jurisdiction to hear the interlocutory appeal on a restraining order and the district court retained jurisdiction to proceed with the trial
A.