With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". under § 1983 has not been established. [¶ 31.] In addition, [t]o state a claim under 42 USC § 1985(3), a plaintiff must plead 1) the existence of a conspiracy; 2) a purpose of depriving a person or class of persons of equal protection of the laws; 3) an act in the furtherance of the alleged conspiracy; and 4) an injury to person or property or the deprivation of a right or privilege granted to a United States citizen. Additionally, a plaintiff must show “some racial, or perhaps otherwise class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus behind the conspirator’s action." Biby v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, 338 FSupp2d 1063, 1074 (D.Neb.2004) (internal citations omitted) (emphasis added). See also Federer v. Gephardt, 363 F.3d 754, 758 (8th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 32.] On appeal, the parents do not assert,

A: holding that a claim under the equal protection section of section 19853 requires proof of classbased animus
B: holding that lprs are entitled to the protection of the equal protection clause
C: holding that equal protection requires that state legislative districts be roughly equal in population
D: holding that defendant had qualified immunity under section 19853 claim where underlying claim failed as a matter of law
A.