With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a verdict for that party. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. at 250-51, 106 S.Ct. at 2511; and Friou v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 948 F.2d 972, 974 (5th Cir.1991); Robertson v. Arco Oil & Gas Co., 948 F.2d 132, 133 (5th Ci ed.R.Civ.P. 56(f). 52 . Exxon Corp. v. Baton Rouge Oil, 77 F.3d at 853; Stults v.. Conoco, Inc., 76 F.3d at 654; Hassan v. Lubbock Independent School District, 55 F.3d 1075, 1078 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 995, 116 S.Ct. 532, 133 L.Ed.2d 438 (1995); Elliott v. Lynn, 38 F.3d 188, 190, (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1117, 115 S.Ct. 1976, 131 L.Ed.2d 865 (1995); Matagorda County v. Russell Law, 19 F.3d 215, 217 (5th Cir.1994); Hibernia National Bank v. Carner, 997 F.2d 94, 97 (5th Cir.1993). 53 . Stults v. Conoco, Inc., 76 F.3d at 654-55, (<HOLDING>); Engstrom v. First National Bank of Eagle

A: holding that nonenglish materials submitted for review may not be considered during the pretrial process or become part of the record
B: holding that hearsay evidence may be considered on summary judgment if the same evidence would be admissible in another form at trial
C: holding that only materials which were included in the pretrial record and that would have been admissible evidence may be considered
D: holding admissible certain evidence which would not have been obtained but for violations of constitutional requirements
C.