With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the home study or direct him to submit additional urinalyses. Further, we And it noteworthy that Steckbauer testified that she never spoke to Father about what he earned from his job, whether he was saving his money, or why he was not sending money to Child, despite his employment. She also did not contact him after she received his psychological evaluation and, as a result, never recommended to Father that he address any impulsivity problems in his therapy sessions. Steckbauer testified that “impulsivity” was a significant issue in assessing parental capacity but that Father was never notified that his “impulsivity” problems could constitute a basis for termination. See State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep’t v. Joseph M., 2006-NMCA-029, ¶¶ 20, 22, 139 N.M. 137, 130 P.3d 198 (<HOLDING>). CYFD also made no attempt to reevaluate

A: holding that the juvenile court could have concluded that dhr had made reasonable efforts to reunite the father with the child
B: recognizing that notwithstanding a finding of aggravated circumstances the mother was not precluded    from making efforts on her own behalf in an attempt to alleviate the conditions that led to the abuse and neglect
C: holding that there was insufficient evidence to support that cyfd made reasonable efforts to assist the father because cyfd never informed him that his relationship with the mother was a cause and condition of the abuse and neglect that could be a basis for termination
D: holding in termination of fathers rights that evidence was sufficient to support finding children were removed for abuse or neglect when previous decree reflected trial court made findings that children were removed from mother under chapter 262 for abuse or neglect
C.