With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". home to the users of such chattels.... Thus, ... if the danger involved in the ignorant use of a particular chattel is very great, it may be that the supplier does not exercise reasonable care in entrusting the communication of the necessary information even to a person whom he has good reason to believe to be careful. Section 388, comment n (emphasis added). 10 . Whether the manufacturers of products supplied for use aboard Navy ships were permitted to provide such warnings gives rise, of course, to the government contractor defense. See Willis v. BW IP Int’l, Inc., 811 F.Supp.2d 1146 (E.D.Pa.2011) (Robreno, J.); Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500, 512, 108 S.Ct. 2510, 101 L.Ed.2d 442 (1988). 11 . Comment "k” to Section 388 of the Restatement (Second) of 179 P.3d 905 (<HOLDING>). 14 . At least one federal court of appeals

A: holding defense applicable to both types of claims
B: holding that plaintiff who filed administrative charge for racial harassment and discrimination could add claim for retaliation because some of the same facts supported both types of claims
C: holding rule applicable to witness
D: recognizing that legal expenses incurred can be characterized as both deductible and nondeductible when the litigation is rooted in situations giving rise to both types of expenditures
A.