With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of whether evidence of a conviction for a third degree sexual offense is admissible for impeachment under Rule 5-609, the intermediate appellate court opined that the conviction was not relevant to credibility and thus inadmissible for impeachment purposes: As shown by an examination of section 3-307 of the Criminal Law Article, there are numerous ways that the State can convict a person under that section. The offense can be committed by various assaultive acts (see Section 3-307(a)(1)), but the offense can also be committed by nonassaultive means. See § § 3-307(a)(2), (3), (4), and (5). “[A]cts of violence generally have little, if any, bearing on honesty and veracity.” Prout, 311 Md. at 364, 535 A.2d 445. See also Fulp [v. State], 130 Md.App. [157] at 167[, 745 A.2d 438 (2000)] (<HOLDING>) Likewise, the non-assaultive ways that a

A: holding that counsel did not admit the defendant was guilty of a crime when counsel noted that if the evidence established the commission of any crime that crime was voluntary manslaughter not murder
B: holding that an infamous crime under the arkansas constitution is a crime involving elements of deceit and dishonesty
C: holding that larceny being a felony is an infamous crime
D: holding that the crime of assault with intent to murder was neither an infamous crime nor a crime relevant to the witnesss credibility 130 mdapp at 167 745 a2d 438
D.