With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". at 154 (“Probable cause to support the issuance of a search warrant ts supporting a search warrant have become sta e search warrant for appellant’s apartment is based entirely on information received by the Pasadena Police Department from two informants, Thumann and Broderick. The affidavit does not state when Thumann filed his initial report with the Pasadena Police Department, when Officer Brinson was assigned to the case, y and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information in circumstances to be considered by magistrate in issuing search warrant). Therefore, because the affidavit was based entirely on hearsay with no substantial basis provided for crediting it, the affidavit was insufficient to support the issuance of a search warrant. See Schmidt, 659 S.W.2d at 421 (<HOLDING>). Moreover, all the information recited in the

A: holding affidavit insufficient when it failed to state when affiant received information from informant when informant obtained information or when described incident took place
B: holding corroborating evidence sufficient that officer drove informant to defendants house saw defendant admit informant and saw informant come out with drugs and defendants voice was identified on audio tape of transaction
C: holding affidavit insufficient to support probable cause when one cannot learn from the affidavit when the past activities occurred and when the observations were made
D: holding that information from confidential informant was reliable and credible where affidavit referred to previous instances in which informant provided correct information to police affiants own investigation and controlled buy of contraband confirmed information and second informant supplied same information to police
A.