With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". notwithstanding, Plaintiffs have not moved to amend the Complaint and, except as discussed above, their opposition brief barely elaborates on the breach of contract claim. 19 . The Court notes that this quote is essentially identical to the brief quoted in Rivera, 637 F.Supp.2d at 269. 20 . See Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 353 and comment a (“Recovery for emotional disturbance will be excluded unless the breach also caused bodily harm or the contract or the breach is of such a kind that serious emotional disturbance was a particularly likely result.... Damages for emotional disturbance are not ordinarily allowed.”). 21 . See Ogbin v. Fein, Such, Kahn & Shepard, PC, No. 08-4138, 2009 WL 1587896 at *3-4, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46954 at *9-10 (D.N.J. May 29, 2009) (Cavanaugh, D J.) (<HOLDING>). 22 .Moreover, as already explained, no error

A: holding that the plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by federal law
B: holding that plaintiffs law firm was subject to disqualifica tion when after unsuccessful mediation the plaintiffs firm hired the mediator appointed to settle the case
C: holding that law firm who was plaintiffs adversary in foreclosure proceeding owed no duty to plaintiffs as law firm could not have expected that plaintiffs would rely on law firms representations about payoff amounts
D: holding that the plaintiffs met their burden by highlighting the experience and qualifications of plaintiffs counsels firm and the firms long history of practice in this area of law
C.