With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Lamarre challenges a judgment entered by the court ('Warren, J.) denying him post-conviction relief from his conviction of two counts of aggravated trafficking of a schedule W drug within one thousand feet of a school (Class A), 17-A M.R.S. § 1105-A(1)(E)(1) (2012), and two counts of violating a condition of release (Class E), 15 M.R.S. § 1092(1)(A) (2012). Lamarre contends that the court erred in finding that Lamarre’s trial attorney provided effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment. I. BACKGROUND [¶ 2] The facts from Lamarre’s underlying trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the State, may no longer be disputed. See State v. Lamarre, Mem-11-16 (Feb. 8, 2011); see also State v. Carey, 2013 ME 88, ¶ 3, 77 A.3d 471; State v. Larrivee, 481 A.2d 782, 783 (Me.1984) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 3] Gina Clark was an opiate addict with

A: holding that a ruling of the trial court to which no error has been assigned becomes the law of the case and is not subject to review by the court of appeals
B: holding that a ruling from a prior decision of this court becomes the law of the case that cannot be challenged in a later proceeding quotation marks omitted
C: holding an unappealed ruling is the law of the case and cannot be later challenged
D: holding that where a ruling on a demurrer to complaint is not appealed from it becomes the law of the case
B.