With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a sufficient likelihood that he will again be wronged in a similar way.” [internal quotation marks omitted]). Thus, the fact that the Estate has standing to sue for damages does not create standing to sue for an injunction. The Estate must demonstrate standing for each form of relief sought. Lyons, 461 U.S. at 109, 103 S.Ct. 1660. In Lyons, the Supreme Court focused on the redressability element of standing, which requires the proposed relief to be likely to redress the plaintiff’s injury. Frank, 968 F.2d at 1376. “[Lyons ] is based on the obvious proposition that a prospective remedy will provide no relief for an injury that is, and likely will remain, entirely in the past.” Id. Under the Lyons standing standard, the fact that the defendants’ discriminatory 08, 312 (5th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). The Estate attempts to distinguish these

A: holding consortium claim unavailable under title vii and ada
B: holding there was no individual liability under titles i ii or iii of the ada
C: holding ada claim was discharged
D: holding that ada claim under title iii did not survive plaintiffs death
D.