With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Anthony Frilando appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Frilando, No. 4:97-cr-00084-CWH-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2012); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251-52 (4th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual §

A: holding that a district court resentencing a defendant based on the retroactive change in the crack cocaine guidelines pursuant to  3582c2 lacks authority to sentence a defendant below the newly calculated guidelines range and need not hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue
B: holding that a defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction under section 3582c2 when the application of that amendment does not result in a lower sentencing range
C: holding that  3582c2 does not authorize a resentencing but merely provides for a sentence reduction within the bounds established by the sentencing commission and that booker does not apply to  3582c2 proceedings
D: holding that  3582c2 does not authorize sentence below minimum of amended guidelines range
D.