With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is not a “qualified individual with a disability” under the ADA disposes of said cause of action. 18 . Having already decided that the Defendant's denial of Plaintiff’s request of January 24, 2002 is time-barred, we will only discuss the second denial for change in territory that took place on December of 2003. 19 . See also Plautz v. Potter, 156 Fed.Appx. 812 (6th Cir.2005) (criticisms of plaintiff's performance or attendance did not constitute ''harassment'' sufficient to create hostile work: environment, under the Rehabilitation Act, absent evidence that employee was ridi culed or insulted because of his medical condition to the point that it permeated the workplace environment); Angelone v. Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, No. CIV. S-05-21G6 FCD JFM, 2007 WL 1033458 (E.D.Cal. April 3, 2007) (<HOLDING>); Lucenti v. Potter, 432 F.Supp.2d 347

A: holding that no reasonable person would find plaintiffs complaints of defendants criticism of her job performance to be objectively abusive
B: holding that the plaintiffs challenge to a state law affecting the performance of her job duties was mooted when she left state employment
C: holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive
D: holding that plaintiff established a prima facie claim of retaliation because the defendants failure to transfer her out of her abusive working environment could be viewed as an adverse personnel action and there was a causal link between the filing of plaintiffs complaint and the defendants failure to transfer her
A.