With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". F.2d 1407, 1409 (9th Cir.1984) (same). As to the jury-cost sanction, the District Court purported to rely on its inherent powers. “It has long been understood that ‘[cjertain implied powers must necessarily result to our Courts of justice from the nature of their institution,’ powers ‘which cannot be dispensed with in a Court, because they are necessary to the exercise of all others.’ ” Chambers, 111 S.Ct. at 2132 (quoting United States v. Hudson, 11 U.S. (7 Crunch) 32, 34, 3 L.Ed. 259 (1812)). The Chambers Court explicitly recognized courts’ inherent power to “assess attorney’s fees when a party has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons.” Id., 111 S.Ct. at 2133 (internal quotations omitted); see also Roadway Express, 447 U.S. at 767, 100 S.Ct. at 2464 (<HOLDING>). The Chambers Court also held that the

A: holding attorneys fees not generally recoverable unless party prevails under cause of action for which attorneys fees are recoverable and damages are recovered
B: holding that a law clerks time is recoverable as part of attorneys fees under  1988
C: holding that attorneys fees and court costs are recoverable under general hold harmless indemnity agreement
D: holding attorneys fees not recoverable under pre1980 version of section 1927 but remanding because they might be justified under the courts inherent power
D.