With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". charge and the contentions contained therein, this Court does not find that Reno’s sexual harassment claim would have been developed and subsequently investigated during the course of the EEOC proceedings. The facts allegedly forming the basis of Reno’s charge o discrimination she advanced in her EEOC charge is sufficiently broad enough to encompass her sexual harassment claim. However, simply “[b]ecause a claim of sexual harassment may constitute sexual discrimination does not imply that a charge consisting of facts which purportedly constitute sexual discrimination necessarily includes all forms of sexual discrimination.” Sandom v. Travelers Mortgage Servs., Inc., 752 F.Supp. 1240, 1247 (D.N.J.1990); see Riley v. Tech. & Management Servs. Corp., 872 F.Supp. 1454, 1459 (D.Md.1995) (<HOLDING>). For instance, in the pending action, Reno’s

A: holding that allegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex
B: holding that a charge that alleged discrimination on the basis of sex did not support a complaint for hostile environment sexual harassment
C: recognizing that a claim of hostile environment sex discrimination is actionable under title vii
D: holding that harassment of women working alongside plaintiff was relevant to question of creation of environment viola tive of title vii  although vinson was a sexual harassment case the principles underlying a hostile environment theory are equally applicable in sexual harassment and racial harassment cases
B.