With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Annie Brooks appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment 773 (9th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). The district court properly granted summary

A: holding that a nonmovant could not oppose a summary judgment motion with an unauthenticated letter
B: holding that unauthenticated documents may be considered in support of a motion for summary judgment where the documents were not objected to or their authenticity disputed
C: holding that unverified pleadings and unauthenticated documents did not constitute proper summary judgment evidence
D: holding that unauthenticated documents cannot be considered at summary judgment
D.