With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". bulk of his debts.”); In re Euro-Am. Lodging Corp., 357 B.R. 700, 713-14 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2007) (finding that debtor was not paying its debts as they become due where one unpaid claim represented 90% of the total debt and the debt had been in default for 15 years); In re Amanat, 321 B.R. 30, 39-40 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2005) (citations omitted) (“Where a debtor fails to pay even one debt that makes up a substantial portion of its overall liability, a court may find that he is generally not paying his debts.”); In re Century/ML Cable Venture, 294 B.R. 9, 31 n. 37 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2003) (citations omitted) ("The failure to pay a single debt can satisfy the requirement of generality where the debt is sufficiently substantial.”); In re Garland Coal & Mining Co., 67 B.R. 514, 521 (Bankr.W.D.Ark.1986) (<HOLDING>). 14 . Mikkelson sold the loader to Travis

A: holding that effect of bankruptcy discharge under arizona law is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debtor
B: holding that a debtor has primarily consumer debts if the aggregate amount of consumer debt is more than 50 of the total debt
C: holding that a debtor is generally not paying debts as they become due where it was paying most of its creditors in number but the total debt which it was not paying exceeded 50 of its outstanding liabilities
D: holding that effect of discharge of debt under bankruptcy code is the same as it was under the 1898 bankruptcy act it is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debt or
C.