With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". immunity. See Validity and Construction of Indian Reorganization Act, 28 A.L.R. Fed.2d 563 at § 27 (citing cases); but see id. at § 28 (citing cases holding that sue-and-be sued clause does not constitute express waiver). Here, however, CNI’s charter does not contain a broad sue-and-be-sued clause; instead, the ability to take legal action is limited to action approved by the board of directors. Thus, even if we were to conclude that a broad sue-and-be-sued clause waives tribal-sovereign immunity, this clause is insufficient to do the job. Cf. Ninigret Dev. Corp. v. Narragansett Indian Wetuomuck Hous. Auth., 207 F.3d 21, 30 (1st Cir.2000) (“[T]he enactment of such an ordinance ... does not waive a tribe’s sovereign immunity.... [Th uper. 357, 747 A.2d 837, 841-42, 844 (1999) (<HOLDING>); but see Rush Creek Solutions, Inc. v. Ute

A: holding that removal to federal court does not waive tribal sovereign immunity
B: holding that an act of legislature may be required to waive sovereign immunity
C: holding that a senior vice presidents signature to an agreement with an express waiver of sovereign immunity provision did not waive sovereign immunity because that right was reserved exclusively to the tribal council
D: holding that a controllers signature on a contract containing a forum selection clause was insufficient to waive sovereign immunity in part because the right to waive immunity was reserved to the tribal council
D.