With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". N.E.2d 816 (2011) (“[T]he decisions in Heller and McDonald were limited to interpreting the [Sjecond [Ajmendment’s protection of the right to possess handguns in the home, not the right to possess handguns outside the home.”); People v. Dawson, 403 Ill.App.3d 499, 508, 343 Ill.Dec. 274, 934 N.E.2d 598 (2010) (“[T]he Heller Court ultimately limited its holding to the question presented — that the [Sjecond [Ajmendment right to bear arms protected the right to possess a commonly used firearm, in the home for self-defense purposes.”); Williams v. State, 417 Md. 479, 10 A.3d 1167, 1178 (2011) (“If the Supreme Court ... meant its holding [in Heller and McDonald] to extend beyond home possession, it will need to say so more plainly.”); Little v. United States, 989 A.2d 1096, 1101 (D.C.2010) (<HOLDING>); Mack v. United States, 6 A.3d 1224, 1236

A: holding that in a prosecution for possession of an unregistered firearm evidence of an armed robbery committed with the firearm was admissible
B: recognizing that a protective search of a residence may be justified when the defendant is arrested outside of the home
C: holding that because the appellant was not in his home he was outside of the bounds identified in heller ie the possession of a firearm in ones private residence for selfdefense purposes
D: holding that defendant was not in custody during search of his residence
C.