With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". In City of Fargo v. Brennan, 543 N.W.2d 240, 242-43 (N.D.1996), this Court further upheld a disorderly conduct conviction based on the defendant’s “primarily [] verbal confrontation” with the victim while encroaching and invading her personal zone of privacy and waving his hands. Actions constituting disorderly conduct need be offensive to only one person. City of Bismarck v. Travis, 154 N.W.2d 918, 923 (N.D.1967). [¶ 14] Courts have found lawful temporary detentions of suspects based on law enforcement officers’ reasonable and articulable suspicion that the suspects had committed the offense of misdemeanor disorderly conduct. See, e.g., Kelly v. Bender, 23 F.3d 1328, 1330 (8th Cir.1994), abrogated on other grounds, Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995) (<HOLDING>); People v. Snyder, 11 Cal. App.4th 389,13

A: holding that an officers reasonable mistake of law can give rise to the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop under the fourth amendment
B: holding that state proved venue for murder when victims body was found in fulton county and scene of stabbing appeared to be within 100 yards from where body was found
C: holding where officers heard a man yelling obscenities 100 yards away asked him to talk to them and another man appeared and repeated the obscenities officers had reasonable suspicion of disorderly conduct to justify lawful temporary detention
D: holding fourth amendment not implicated when police officers asked defendant to see his airline ticket asked for identification and requested consent to search him
C.