With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". are not per se unenforceable, the Texas Supreme Court in In re Prudential expressly “echo[ed] the United States Supreme Court’s admonition [in Brady v. United States ] that “waivers of constitutional rights must be knowing, intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences.’ ” Id. Thus, the Texas Supreme Court equated the Texas standard for a “knowing and voluntary” prelitigation contractual jury waiver with the “knowing and voluntary” standard utilized in criminal cases like Brady to assess the validity of a defendant’s pretrial waiver of a jury trial via a guilty plea. In re Prudential, 148 S.W.3d at 132; see Brady, 397 U.S. at 748, 90 S.Ct. at 1469. But see L & R Realty v. Conn. Nat’l Bank, 246 Conn. 1, 715 A.2d 748, 755 (1998) (<HOLDING>)- This was a logical step by the supreme court

A: holding that the appropriate standard of review is abuse of discretion
B: holding the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment extends the right to jury trial to defendants in serious criminal cases in state courts
C: holding that state courts must apply the federal pleading standard in fela cases
D: holding in commercial loan transaction that it is appropriate to apply a lower standard in determining the enforceability of prelitigation contractual jury trial waivers than for waivers in criminal cases
D.