With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". constitutes purposeful availment, as defendant financially benefits from doing business in Georgia.” Rice, 975 F.Supp.2d at 1371 (citing WorldWide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297, 100 S.Ct. 580, 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980) (when a corporation purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum, it is on notice that it may be sued and is therefore subject to personal jurisdiction)). OMsignal relies heavily on the theory that mere operation of a commercial website, available to customers across the country, is not itself sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction in any district where the website can be viewed. See Datascape, Inc. v. Sprint Nextel Corp., No. 1:07-cv-0640-CC, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124238, at *18-19 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 29, 2008) (<HOLDING>). But this argument misses the mark. This

A: holding that single substantial act can support exercise of personal jurisdiction
B: recognizing that the mere operation of a commercially interactive website is not by itself an adequate basis for the exercise of personal jurisdiction anywhere the site can be viewed
C: holding that an interactive website allowing clients to bank online was insufficient to confer general jurisdiction over a foreign bank
D: holding passive website to be an invalid reason for granting jurisdiction
B.