With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v. Domingo, 82 Hawai'i 265, 921 P.2d 1166 (1996) (following Morin). However, inasmuch as sentence is determined after a plea is accepted, and (absent a prior agreement between the parties) a defendant cannot know what sentence will be imposed, a plea of no contest or guilty does not constitute a waiver of an appeal of the sentence on the grounds that it is illegal. See State v. Johnson, 459 So.2d 1316, 1319 (La.Ct.App.1984) (Crain, J., concurring) ("[A] guilty plea coupled with an agreed upon sentence that is made part of the record waives [the] right to appellate review of the sentence, but where there is no specific agreement in the record as to [the] sentenced] it will be reviewed on appeal." (Citations omitted.)); State v. Carroll, 104 Ohio App.3d 372, 662 N.E.2d 65, 69-70 (1995) (<HOLDING>); People v. Crum, 175 A.D.2d 136, 572 N.Y.S.2d

A: holding that an express waiver of the right to appeal the sentence was invalid because the trial court had failed properly to advise the defendant and that the defendant therefore did not waive his right to appeal the legality of his sentence
B: holding that the defendant waived the right to appeal his sentence including the terms and conditions of his supervised release when he agreed to a plea agreement that said he expressly waives his right to appeal the conviction and sentence imposed on any ground emphasis added
C: holding that under subsection al as then written the defendant had no right to appeal whether his sentence was supported by evidence presented because he entered into a plea agreement as to the sentence
D: holding that failure to advise of right of appeal entitles defendant to belated appeal
A.