With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". deprives a party of the right to come into court. Id. (quoting 59 Am. Jur. 2d Parties § 24 (1987)). The fighting issue is the effect of the 2001 amendment to chapter 513C. See 2001 Iowa Acts- ch. 125. The universities argue the 2001 amendment to chapter 513C stripped the IIHBRA of its capacity to sue by deleting a provision expressly empowering it to sue. The district court and court of appeals agreed. The IIHBRA argues the 2001 amendment merely removed “duplicative language” and left intact its express power to sue in Iowa Code section 504.302. We agree that the 2001 amendment did not eliminate the IIH-BRA’s capacity to sue. Because the,IIHBRA is a nonprofit corporation created by statute, the Iowa Code must establish the IIHBRA’s capacity to sue. ’ See Llewellyn, 200 N.W.2d at 884 (<HOLDING>). We construe the 2001 amendment “mindful of

A: holding that congress may impose its will on the states as long as it is acting within the powers granted by the constitution
B: holding that in order for there to be state debt in the constitutional sense one legislature in effect must obligate a future legislature to appropriate funds to discharge the debt created by the first legislature
C: holding entities created by statute can only exercise the powers granted to them by the legislature
D: holding in age discrimination case under adea that same considerations are pertinent when deciding single employer issue for public entities as for private entities and applying nlrb test to resolve the question noting that where government entities are concerned court also must keep constitutional separation of powers issues in mind
C.