With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Ga. App. 842, 842 (689 SE2d 130) (2010); see also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B) (99 SCt 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 7 Joiner v. State, 299 Ga. App. 300, 300 (682 SE2d 381) (2009); see also Jackson, 443 U. S. at 319 (III) (B). 8 Miller v. State, 273 Ga. 831, 832 (546 SE2d 524) (2001) (punctuation omitted). 9 See former OCGA § 16-5-21 (a) (2) (1991). 10 See former OCGA § 16-5-40 (a) (1994). 11 See former OCGA § 16-5-40 (b) (1994). 12 Harris v. State, 332 Ga. App. 789, 790-91 (1) (775 SE2d 165) (2015) (punctuation omitted); see Brock v. State, 293 Ga. 156, 157-58 (1) (743 SE2d 410) (2013) (“It is the jury’s role to assess the credibility of witnesses and resolve any inconsistencies in the evidence.”). 13 See Bester v. State, 294 Ga. 195, 195-96 (1) (751 SE2d 360) (2013) (<HOLDING>); Dennis v. State, 293 Ga. 688, 689-90 (1) (748

A: holding that because evidence was sufficient to support defendants  1962c convictions and jury could infer from evidence that defendants each manifested an agreement to participate in enterprises affairs evidence was sufficient to support defendants  1962d convictions for rico conspiracy
B: holdingthat evidence was sufficient to support defendants convictions on rape and aggravated assault charges
C: holdingthat defendants moving victims from their own vehicle before shooting them was sufficient to support kidnappingwithbodilyinjury charge
D: holding that evidence was sufficient to establish aggravated assault where appellant was seen pointing and firing a gun at two women
B.