With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". potential surrogates were too minor to reasonably support a conclusion that data superiority outweighed any potential benefits from using data from a surrogate with a GNI that was closer to that of the NME in question. See China Shrimp AR5, — CIT -, 882 F.Supp.2d at 1375-76. 22 . Zhejiang DunAn Hetian Metal Co. v. United States, - CIT -, 707 F.Supp.2d 1355, 1366 (2010) (footnote omitted), vacated, on other grounds, 652 F.3d 1333 (Fed.Cir.2011); see also Dorbest Ltd. v. United States, 604 F.3d 1363, 1371 (Fed.Cir.2010) (“Commerce determines a linear trend that best fits the data, providing a way to predict the labor rate for a country with any given gross national income.”); Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 61 Fed.Reg. 7308, 7345 (D es, - CIT -, 774 F.Supp.2d 1307, 1316 (2011) (<HOLDING>). 25 . Antidumping Methodologies in Proceedings

A: holding that  21919 unambiguously requires collection of population data
B: holding that constitution requires  an opportunity  granted at a meaningful time and a meaningful manner  for a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case
C: holding that letters from insureds attorney to accounting firm not privileged under the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the communication and compelling production
D: holding that because the statute requires commerce to use to the extent possible data from countries that are significant producers of comparable merchandise commerce may not employ a methodology that requires using data from countries which almost certainly have no domestic production  at least not any meaningful production capable of having influence or effect
D.