With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that courts adhere [during sentencing proceedings before a jury or a court] to the same rules of evidence which govern the guilt stage of a trial.) (citing Gregg, 428 U.S. at 203-04, 96 S.Ct. 2909; Williams, 337 U.S. at 246-47, 69 S.Ct. 1079); cf. 18 U.S.C. § 3593(c) (providing that rules governing admission of evidence at criminal trials do not apply in sentencing proceedings in a death penalty case before a jury or the court); 21 U.S.C. § 848(j) (same). Contra O’Daniel, 328 F.Supp.2d at 1178-82. That the Rules are inapplicable does not render sentencing proceedings an evidentiary free-for-all. Bradley, 880 F.Supp. at 286-787. The court retains the inherent authority to manage proceedings and restrain the presentation of unreliable, irrelevant, or unfairly prejudicial evidence. Id. (<HOLDING>); see also Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38,

A: holding that disputes as to evidence admitted at a restitution hearing are meritless because the rules of evidence do not apply during sentencing proceedings
B: holding that although federal rules of evidence do not govern sentencing proceedings before a jury in a death penalty case court possesses inherent authority to exclude relevant evidence as unreliable or prejudicial
C: recognizing that the federal rules of evidence do not apply to sentencing hearings
D: holding that because restitution hearings are a part of sentencing and have nothing to do with a defendants guilt or innocence the rules of evidence do not apply
B.