With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to perform the contract in whole or in part in this state” or who "recruits Texas residents ... for employment inside or outside this state,” may also apply because Hoag-land alleges he is a Texas resident who entered into a contract with appellees after they induced him in Texas to do so and that appel-lees "hired him to continue to act as Chairman [of the FairTax Campaign], write virtually everything related to the campaign ... as well as to appear on local and national media outlets and lead rallies and such.” See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code § 17.042(1), (3). However, Hoagland was required only to allege facts bringing one of his claims within the terms of the statute. See Horizon Shipbuilding v. BLyn II Holding, LLC, 324 S.W.3d 840, 847 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). 8 . Hoagland alleged "Bill called [Hoagland]

A: holding negligent misrepresentation sufficient
B: holding misrepresentation made by outofstate defendant to texas plaintiff who relied on it in texas satisfied requirement for jurisdiction under longarm statute based on commission of a tort in part in texas
C: holding that misrepresentation was essential to plaintiffs claim
D: holding plaintiffs allegation that defendants committed torts in houston texas was sufficient to bring defendants under the longarm statute for plaintiffs claims of various forms of fraud and negligent misrepresentation
D.