With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Keeling; Vine St. Exhibit 104 (J. Keeling 07/12/05 Dep. at 61). 86 . Mar. 20, 2006 Trial Test, of James Keeling. 87 . See Vine St. Exhibit 40 at 001947; Vine St. Exhibit 41 at 001954; Fedders Exhibit 14, Attachment G at M001686 (form Norge Village License and Franchise Agreement). 88 . Fedders Exhibit 14, Attachment G at M001645. 89 . See Mar. 21, 2006 Trial Test, of Peter Kras-noff; Vine St. Exhibit 80 at M002370 (figure 7), M002462; Vine St. Exhibit 100 (Warren Dep. at 111). 90 . See Payless Cleaners, 368 F.Supp.2d a nership or possession of the hazardous substance must be demonstrated, but ... alone will not suffice to establish [arranger] liability”); BP Amoco Chem. Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 316 F.Supp.2d 166, 172 (D.Del.2004) (applying Morton Int’l); Shell Oil Co., 294 F.3d at 1058 (<HOLDING>); Sea Lion, Inc. v. Wall Chem. Corp., 974

A: holding that ownership or possession or actual control is needed
B: holding that k no wing possession can be demonstrated by proof of either actual or constructive possession
C: holding that cerclas statutory scheme makes authority to control handling and disposal critical but not squarely addressing the ownership or possession requirement issue
D: holding that the phrase possession or custody in  5225b requires actual and not merely constructive possession
A.