With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". . § 2615(a)(1). 46 . § 2615(a)(2). 47 . § 2617(c)(1). 48 . § 2617(c)(2). 49 . (Doc. 71, Ex. A.) While plaintiff refers to this document as a “memo,” there is no “to” or "from” line and no indication who wrote it. 50 . Shaub v. Newton Wall Co/UCAC, 153 Fed.Appx. 461, 464 (10th Cir.2005) (quoting Hullman v. Bd. of Trustees of Pratt Cmty. Coll., 950 F.2d 665, 668 (10th Cir.1991); Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(e)). 51 . (Doc. 53 at 8.) 52 . Plaintiff refers the Court to her affidavit at ¶¶ 71-72, where she asserts that Moser told her in March 2004 that if she made another error she was going to be fired and that he changed her quotas unfairly. Even if Moser told plaintiff this information in March, this does not explain either the April email or the fact that plaintiff F.Supp.2d 1235, 1242 (D.Kan.1999) (<HOLDING>). 62 . No. 03-2348-GTV, 2004 WL 2634444, at *10

A: holding that defendant interfered with plaintiffs right when the employer forced her to choose between resignation and working without leave
B: holding claim accrued when employee tendered letter of resignation not when resignation became effective
C: recognizing constructive discharge where employer rather than acting directly deliberately makes employees working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable employee would be forced into involuntary resignation
D: holding that plaintiff failed to establish a constructive discharge claim because she did not assert that her employer was motivated by a desire to avoid pretermination procedures without considering whether plaintiff could alternatively allege only that she was forced to choose between resignation and termination
A.