With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” 10 . Notably, we did not rely on Williams in holding that a defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause are "severely restrict ed” in noncapital, Guideline sentencing proceedings. See United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1328 (5th Cir.1990). 11 . “Life or death?” has a distinctly different tone and importance than, "death eligible, or not death eligible?” 12 . This does not imply that Confrontation Clause error is “structural error” in the technical sense of that phrase. “Confrontation Clause errors, like other trial errors, are subject to harmless-error analysis.” Hall, 152 F.3d at 406. 13 . See Robinson v. Polk, 438 F.3d 350, 359 (4th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 514, 166

A: holding that the confrontation clause applies equally to sentencing proceedings tried to a jury
B: holding confrontation clause inapplicable at sentencing
C: holding the confrontation clause applies only to testimonial statements
D: holding that the confrontation clause applies only to trials and not to sentencing hearings
A.