With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". police immediately after being rescued not testimonial). 15 . To this extent, although the analyses are conceptually distinct, some of the same underlying facts and circumstances may bear upon the determination of both whether a hearsay statement is an excited utterance and whether it is testimonial under Crawford. The State proposes that, in cases where the status of a hearsay statement as an excited utterance and Crawford testimonial hearsay are both disputed, we adopt an analytical framework in which we consider, first, whether the statement is an excited utterance; and, if so, then whether it is testimonial. We agree that this is a useful framework — and one consistent with Davis — and apply it here. 16 .See Flores v. State, 170 S.W.3d 722, 722 (Tex.App.-Amarillo, 2005, no pet. h.) (<HOLDING>); Lee v. State, 143 S.W.3d 565, 568-71

A: holding that hearsay statement between relatives concerning the circumstances of an infants death was not testimonial
B: holding that the defendants objection did not suggest that the objected to statement was hearsay and therefore concluding that the defendant waived appellate review of the hearsay argument
C: holding that the confrontation clause applies only to testimonial hearsay
D: holding that an objection on hearsay grounds did not preserve for appeal an exception to the hearsay rule that was not specifically raised
A.