With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". pet. ref'd); see also People v. Sanchez Cortorreal, 226 A.D.2d 737, 642 N.Y.S.2d 36, 36 (N.Y.App.Div.1996) (finding no “improvident exercise of discretion” when three jurors witnessed altercation between victim’s and defendant’s families outside courthouse because jurors were questioned in camera and said they could still render impartial verdict). In Williams, after a jury found appellant guilty, his family “began a disturbance in the courtroom” in the presence of the jury. Williams, 651 S.W.2d at 821. The disturbance was a “ ‘melee’ ... between [appellant’s] family and police officers, and, at some point, the appellant joined in the fracas.” Id. The trial court instructed the jury “not to let what m.App.2003); Matthews v. State, 960 S.W.2d 750, 757 (Tex.App.-Tyler 1997, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). The defendant has the burden to show that the

A: holding outburst from victims father telling jury to give my son justice please cured by trial courts instruction to jury to disregard remark
B: holding mistrial not warranted for improper statement by police officer where court sustained defendants objection and admonished jury to disregard statement and where there was overwhelming evidence of guilt
C: holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendants request for severance because the district court nullified any prejudicial error when it repeatedly admonished the jury throughout the trial to consider the evidence only against the defendant to whom it related and at the end of trial gave the jury instructions that admonished the jury to consider separately each offense and evidence in support of each offense
D: holding outburst by victims brother during defense counsels crossexamination of witness called by state not so prejudicial as to preclude cure by instruc tion when trial court immediately admonished jury not to consider the statement
D.