With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of recovery: unjust enrichment, breach of implied contract, conversion, and constructive fraud. She also requested that punitive damages be awarded. Bailey also sought to have the litigation certified as a class action. Following a hearing, the trial court granted her motion and ordered that the class be defined as "(alll current and former hourly employees of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (including its operating divisions Sam's Club and Wal-Mart Supercenters) in the State of Indiana during the period August 1, 1998 to present." Appendix at 61. Wal-Mart subsequently sought certification of the order for interlocutory appeal. That motion was granted; consequently, the issue of class certification is properly before this court. See Martin v. Amoco Oil Co., 696 N.E.2d 383, 385-86 (Ind.1998) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied 525 U.S. 1049, 119 S.Ct. 608,

A: holding that entry of final judgment on a claim in a multiparty action pursuant to rule 54b should clearly articulate the reasons and factors underlying the decision to grant 54b certification
B: holding that an order was interlocutory in nature despite the trial courts certification of the order as a final appealable judgment
C: holding the trial court is required to make a determination on impairment of access prior to trial
D: holding that unless trial court certifies trial rule 28 determination as final under trial rule 54b it remains interlocutory
D.