With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to hold appointed counsel accountable if they are ineffective). 7 . See Lassiter v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 27-32, 101 S.Ct. 2153, 2159-62, 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981). 8 . Id. 9 . Id. at 33-34, 101 S.Ct. at 2163. 10 . Id. at 34, 101 S.Ct. at 2163. 11 . Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 107.013 (Vernon 2002). 12 . See Santosky, 455 U.S. at 753, 102 S.Ct. at 1394; see also Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 24-32, 101 S.Ct. at 2158-62; Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 37, 101 S.Ct. at 2165 (Blackmun, J. dissenting); Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 59-60, 101 S.Ct. at 2176 (Stevens, J. dissenting). 13 . 519 U.S. 102, 119, 117 S.Ct. 555, 565, 136 L.Ed.2d 473 (1996). 14 . See id. at 125, 117 S.Ct. at 568. 15 . Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 27-32, 101 S.Ct. at 2159-62. 16 . M.L.B. v. S.L.J., 519 U.S. 102, 110-11, 117 S.Ct. 555, 561 (1996) (<HOLDING>); Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 401, 105 S.Ct.

A: recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees a defendant the right to counsel and the right to waive counsel
B: holding right to be fundamental
C: recognizing that although the federal constitution guarantees no right to appellate review it is fundamental that once a state affords that right it must be kept free of unreasoned distinctions that can only impede open and equal access to the courts
D: holding that there is no due process right to appellate review
C.