With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". — and only if — the plaintiff shows discriminatory intent. See, e.g., Nieves-Marquez v. Puerto Rico, 353 F.3d 108, 126 (1st Cir.2003) (“[P]rivate individuals may recover compensatory damages under § 504 and Title II only for intentional discrimination.”); Delano-Pyle v. Victoria County, Tex., 302 F.3d 567, 574 (5th Cir.2002) (“A plaintiff asserting a private cause of action for violations of the ADA or the RA may only recover compensatory damages upon a showing of intentional discrimination.”); Powers v. MJB Acquisition Corp., 184 F.3d 1147, 1152-53 (10th Cir.1999) (district court committed reversible error in failing to instruct jury that plaintiff needed to show intentional discrimination to recover compensatory damages); Ferguson v. City of Phoenix, 157 F.3d 668, 674 (9th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); Wood v. President and Trustees of Spring Hill

A: holding that title ii does not apply to the states
B: holding that a plaintiff cannot bring an action under 42 usc  1983 against a state official in her individual capacity to vindicate rights created by title ii of the ada or section 504 of the rehabilitation act
C: holding that compensatory dam ages are not available under title ii or  504 absent a showing of discriminatory intent
D: holding that title ii of the ada is not applicable to the federal government
C.