With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v. N.E. Power Co., 133 N.H. 753, 756, 584 A.2d 179, 181 (1990). We base our judgment on this question of law on the trial court’s findings of fact. See Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978). Clear and unambiguous terms of a deed control how we construe the parties’ intent, see Lussier, 133 N.H. at 756, 584 A.2d at 181, but the law may imply supplemental rights. See Sakansky v. Wein, 86 N.H. 337, 339, 169 A. 1, 2-3 (1933). The overriding principle defining the parties’ proper exercise of their rights is the rule of reason, which gives “detailed definition to rights created by general words either actually used” in the deed “or, whose existence is implied by law.” Id. at 339, 169 A. at 2; cf. Robbins, 118 N.H. at 536-37, 389 A.2d at 942 (<HOLDING>); White v. Hotel Co., 68 N.H. 38, 43, 34 A.

A: holding trial court did not err in failing to define manufacture
B: holding that trial court did not err
C: holding that a trial court did not clearly err in finding that an attorney fees clause materially altered a contract
D: holding that trial court did not err in finding implied right to use and enjoyment of beach in deeded right of way to beach
D.