With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". misconduct has occurred. " 'Prosecutorial misconduct occurs when the prosecutor's comments call the jurors' attention to matters not proper for their consideration and when the comments have a reasonable likelihood of prejudicing the jury by significantly influencing its verdict.'" State v. Wengreen, 2007 UT App 264, ¶18, ed to theft of the computer, making any reference to theft of software irrelevant. Such tactics have been rejected in Utah. See State v. Saunders, 1999 UT 59, ¶ 29, 992 P.2d 951 (finding "[the prosecutor far exceeded appropriate prosecutorial zeal and seriously corrupted the integrity of the truth-finding function of the trial" when he referenced conduct of the defendant that did not in any way relate to the charges); State v. Young, 853 P.2d 327, 348-49 (Utah 1998) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, I would conclude that the

A: holding that encouraging the jury to determine its verdict based upon evidence outside the record jeopardizes a defendants rights
B: recognizing that a motion for directed verdict should be granted when there is no reasonable evidence upon which a jury could legally predicate a verdict in favor of the nonmoving party
C: holding that a jury verdict will be sustained on any reasonable theory based on the evidence
D: holding that notwithstanding defendants consent the verdict was a nullity where the trial court proceeded to verdict with a jury of eleven
A.