With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". OPINION PER CURIAM. We have for consideration proposed amendments to the Florida rules of court and forms intended to minimize the amount of unnecessary personal information included in documents filed with the courts. Reducing the amount of extraneous personal information in court records is another necessary step in the Court’s ongoing effort to provide the public with electronic access to nonconfidential court records. As part of that effort, we re cently adopted procedures that allow clerks of court to readily identify and screen from the public confidential information filed with the courts and refine the procedures for sealing and unsealing court records. See In re Amends, to Fla. Rule of Jud. Admin. 2420 & Fla. Rules of App. Pro., 31 So.3d 756, 757 (Fla.2010) (<HOLDING>). The amendments at issue here further

A: recognizing that certain conditions including rule amendments must be met before goal of providing the public electronic access to court records can be achieved
B: recognizing that refinement of rule governing confidential court records was a necessary step in providing the public electronic access to court records
C: recognizing that intent of public records act is to provide all citizens with access to the records of all public governmental bodies
D: holding that electronic records may be subject to a claim for conversion
B.