With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that accepting the latter position would create the perception that at least one of the courts was misled. Id. at 750-51, 121 S.Ct. 1808; Eastman v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 493 F.3d 1151, 1156 (10th Cir.2007). Accordingly, courts consistently hold that a debtor who conceals a legal claim and denies owning the asset in bankruptcy is judicially estopped from later pursuing that claim to the debtor’s personal benefit. See, e.g., Cannon-Stokes, 453 F.3d at 448; Jethroe v. Omnova Solutions, Inc., 412 F.3d 598 (5th Cir.2005); Barger v. City of Cartersville, 348 F.3d 1289, 1296 (11th Cir.2003). But here it is undisputed that Matthews did not conceal her administrative complaints during the bankruptcy proceedings. See Eubanks v. CBSK Fin. Group, Inc., 385 F.3d 894, 898 & n. 1 (6th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); see also InterGen N.V. v. Grina, 344 F.3d

A: holding that claims for alleged legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against attorneys that represented the chapter 11 debtor in possession belonged to the bankruptcy estate and upon conversion of the case to chapter 7 such claims belonged to the chapter 7 trustee as successor to the debtor in possession
B: holding that a chapter 7 trustee was the only person with authority to bring  a cause of action after the appointment of a trustee
C: holding that judicial estoppel does not preclude a chapter 7 trustee from bringing a suit which the debtor failed to list on her schedules
D: holding that judicial estoppel was inapplicable where debtor omitted potential claim against defendant from chapter 7 schedules but orally disclosed it to the trustee during the meeting of creditors
D.