With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". § 1404(a), the court held that a district court could transfer a case sua sponte under § 1412 and that “the bankruptcy court may, therefore, pursuant to § 157(a), also transfer sua sponte a case under 28 U.S.C. § 1412.” Id. at 156. The power given to a bankruptcy court to enforce its own orders under 11 U.S.C. § 105 lends support to the well-accepted proposition that a court may transfer a case sua sponte. Sec. 105(a) specifically states that “[n]o provision of this title providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process.” See, e.g., In re Wilson, 284 B.R. at 111 (<HOLDING>) ; In re Scott Cable Comm., Inc., 263 B.R. at 8

A: holding that bankruptcy courts have independent authority pursuant to 11 usc  105 and rule 9024 of the federal rules of bankruptcy procedure to reconsider sua sponte their own orders at any time
B: holding that rule 60b bars sua sponte relief
C: holding that a court may sua sponte take judicial notice of its docket
D: holding that  105 allows sua sponte transfer under rule 1014a2
D.