With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". disagree with the content of employees' speech.”). 120 . Brawner v. City of Richardson, 855 F.2d 187, 191-92 (5th Cir.1988). See also Conaway v. Smith, 853 F.2d 789, 796 (10th Cir.1988) (per curiam) ("Speech which discloses any evidence of corruption, impropriety, or other malfeasance on the part of city officials, in terms of content, clearly concerns matters of public import.”). 121 . Thompson, 901 F.2d at 463 (citing Connick, 461 U.S. at 147, 103 S.Ct. 1684). 122 . Id. at 464 (and discussion of case precedent). See also Brawner, 855 F.2d at 192 (“This c .2d at 136; and Rhode v. Denson, 776 F.2d 107, 109 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170, 106 S.Ct. 2891, 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986). 169 . Pembaur, 475 U.S. at 483, 106 S.Ct. 1292 (plurality); Dallas I.S.D., 153 F.3d at 216 (<HOLDING>); Bingley, 906 F.2d at 1054 (holding a city

A: holding that school district policy requiring that students obtain the review and approval of school officials prior to distributing any written material violated free speech rights of students
B: holding that a local school district did not delegate final district policymaking authority over complaints of sexual misconduct by teachers against students to campus principals although the district had not adopted a formal policy addressing the manner in which such complaints should be handled
C: holding school districts failure to adopt an official policy addressing allegations of sexual assault by teachers on students could not support section 1983 liability where that failure was merely an unintentional negligent oversight
D: holding school district hable for teachers sexual harassment of student only upon knowing failure to act
B.