With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". attorney fees given absence of prejudice to opposing party resulting from extension of time limit). Nor did the court abuse its discretion by failing to specify its reasons for extending the time for filing the motion. Cf. Nat’l Broker Assocs., Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc., 211 Ariz. 210, ¶ 38, 119 P.3d 477, 485 (App.2005) (trial court does not abuse discretion “by summarily overruling objections to an untimely statement of costs”). ¶ 14 Bingham further argues the trial court committed reversible error in awarding-attorney fees in the quiet title action pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1103 because Cain did not tender five dollars along with a request for the execution of a quit claim deed as required by § 12-1103(B). See Lange v. Lotzer, 151 Ariz. 260, 262, 727 P.2d 38, 40 (App.1986) (<HOLDING>). We review a fee award under this statute for

A: holding that the absence of a formal injunction does not preclude the plaintiff from recovering costs and attorney fees under mcl 152714
B: holding that prevailing party to contract dispute may recover attorneys fees either pursuant to contract or pursuant to statute
C: holding payment of five dollars to other party prerequisite for recovering attorney fees pursuant to  121103b
D: recognizing that the party seeking attorney fees bears the burden of proving entitlement to those fees
C.