With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function.” Id. The ALJ found that Roth-feldt had several severe physical impairments, including probable osteoarthritis. This in and of itself is sufficient to meet the requirement that he have a physical impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function. See Edwards v. Heckler, 755 F.2d 1513, 1515 (11th Cir. 1985) (concluding that the term “ ‘significant’ requires something less than ‘severe’” when considering whether an impairment is disabling). It is of no import whether Rothfeldt’s additional impairment is mental; an IQ score between 60 and 70 with an unrelated significant physical impairment satisfies the criteria for Listing 12.05(C). Id. at 1516 (<HOLDING>). We cannot know if Rothfeldt meets the

A: holding petitioners claim was factual in nature where he alleged the bia had failed to accord sufficient weight to the seriousness of his sons asthma
B: holding that the alj erred in rejecting the iq of a claimant whose work history was limited primarily to working for his father
C: holding that a claimant was entitled to benefits under listing 1205c because he had an iq score of 67 in addition to asthma and lung disease
D: holding that completing sixth grade and a limited ability to read were not inconsistent with a valid iq score of 68
C.