With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to a third party for resolution without recourse to the courts, and both procedures are creatures of contract. See Teachworth, 898 F.2d at 1061-62. Nonetheless, there are significant differences between arbitration and appraisal. See id. An arbitration may encompass the entire controversy between the parties or it may be tailored to certain legal or factual disputes. See id. By contrast, an appraisal determines only the amount of loss, without resolving issues such as whether the insurer is liable under the policy. See In re Allstate Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co., 85 S.W.3d at 195; Scottish Union & Nat’l Ins. Co., 8 S.W. at 631; Fraiman, 514 S.W.2d at 344-45; Teachworth, 898 F.2d at 1061-62. Thus, statutes governing arbitration do not apply to appraisals. See Fraiman, 514 S.W.2d at 344-45 (<HOLDING>); Teachworth, 898 F.2d at 1061-63 (holding that

A: holding order denying arbitration appealable under texas law and stating that although the faa also permits a party to appeal from an interlocutory order denying a request to compel arbitration federal procedure does not apply in texas courts even when texas courts apply the federal act footnote omitted
B: holding texas arbitration act did not apply to appraisal provision in insur ance policy
C: holding that since appraisal is analogous to arbitration  we apply principles of arbitration law to this dispute regarding an insurance policy appraisal clause
D: holding that because appraisal is analogous to arbitration the court would apply principles of arbitration law to this dispute regarding an insurance policy appraisal clause
B.