With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ratification of the alleged bailment contract: I also attended a number of meetings with Jan Van Kerkhove and Mary Ann Ignatius, then Cultural Attaché for the U.S. Embassy in Belgium, at their offices at the American Cultural Center. I had frequent contact with Mary Ann Ignatius during this time. She was intimately involved in preparing for the exhibition, and was fully aware of every detail of the show. Every aspect of the exhibition had to meet with her approval, and it did. Exhibit D. Leonardo II, 60 Fed.Cl. at 131 (quotation omitted). The court reasoned that “the fact that Ms. Ignatius approved ‘[e]very aspect of the exhibition’ does not necessarily mean that she approved an agreement that Mr. Van Kerkhove and plaintiff discussed.” Id.; cf. Beebe, 180 U.S. at 354, 21 S.Ct. 371 (<HOLDING>); Harbert/Lummus, 142 F.3d at 1434 (noting that

A: holding that arizona rule of civil procedure 52a requires the court to find only the ultimate facts not the evidentiary facts upon which the ultimate facts are based
B: holding knowledge of the bankruptcy petition and action taken thereafter was sufficient to find a willful violation of the stay
C: holding that ratification requires full knowledge of all the facts upon which the unauthorized action was taken
D: recognizing that on the part of a fiduciary there is a duty to make a full disclosure of any and all material facts within his knowledge and of which he knows or should know that the other person is ignorant
C.