With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". for a different result. Coffey, 796 F.2d at 220; Kendall U.S.A., Inc., 666 F.Supp. at 1268. Factors considered in this analysis include, the likely speed to trial in each forum; each forum’s familiarity with the relevant law; and the relationship of each forum to the controversy, particularly concerning whether jurors have a financial interest in the case, and whether jurors in one forum are better equipped to apply community standards. Coffey, 796 F.2d at 221 n. 4; RCA Trademark Mgmt. S.A.S., 2014 WL 3818289, at *5. Neither party asserts that one district would result in a faster resolution of this case. This Court also concludes that there is little meaningful difference in the adjudicatory speed betwee Co., No. 1:14-cv-00823-TWP-DML, 2015 WL 5552660, at *8 (S.D.Ind. Sept. 16, 2015) (<HOLDING>). Additionally, the Defendants do not contest

A: holding that an eight and onehalf month delay was enough to warrant further inquiry
B: holding that three sexually suggestive comments over a three month period were not frequent enough nor severe enough to be unreasonable interference with the plaintiffs work environment
C: holding that a two month difference in median time to disposition was not statistically significant enough to favor one forum over another
D: holding that a one month delay is acceptable
C.