With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". information requested in his Motion to Produce. The trial court denied this request, finding that no orders on discovery had been requested or violated. Black then elicited testimony from Jeff Retz ("Retz"), the State's toxicology tech-pician, regarding the court-ordered Med-Tox test. The trial court, pursuant to State's objection, found Retz's testimony insufficient to provide a foundation for the Med-Tox test and exeluded the test results from evidence. Tr. pp. 62-65. The trial court found that Black had violated the terms of his probation by testing positive for cocaine but stayed Black's sentence pending this appeal. I. Admission of the Med-Tox Test Indiana - Rule of Evidence 101(c)(2) states that, "[the rules, other than those with respect to privilege Ct.App.2001), trans. denied (<HOLDING>). Contra Baxter v. State, 774 N.E.2d 1037, 1043

A: holding hearsay admissible in revocation hearings
B: holding that certified charging informations and police reports are deemed admissible in revocation hearings
C: holding uncertified investigation reports of law enforcement personnel inherently unreliable and inadmissible in revocation hearings
D: holding that probation and parole revocation hearings are not criminal proceedings such that the state exclusionary rule applies but noting that police misconduct which shocks the conscience may lead to invocation of the exclusionary rule
B.