With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to or reckless disregard for the safety of others. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.CODE ANN. § 101.055(2); Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 227-28; Kuhn, 260 S.W.3d at 100; Hudson, 179 S.W.3d at 701. Sparks points to Trooper Price’s conclusion that Hallett violated section 546.001 of the transportation code by entering the intersection against a red light. However, Price also concluded that Hallett stopped before entering the intersection and stated that the basis for his conclusion that Hal-lett violated the statute was “[sjolely the fact that another car hit him.” We disagree that Price’s conclusion raises a genuine issue of material fact. Price also found that Hallett s 9-CV, 2011 WL 1852439, *3-5, 2011 Tex.App. LEXIS 3485, at **8-14 (Tex. App.-San Antonio May 11, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (<HOLDING>); City of Arlington v. Barnes, No.

A: holding officers failure to adhere to policy requiring emergency vehicles to come to complete stop and failure to remember looking both ways before entering intersection did not raise fact issue as to whether officer acted in conscious indifference to or reckless disregard for safety of others
B: holding prison official must have acted with reckless disregard for the inmates safety
C: holding evidence that officer entered the intersection against red light insufficient to raise fact issue as to whether he acted recklessly
D: holding that written reprimand stating that officer failed to exercise due care and failed to comply with section 546005 were evidence that officer only acted negligently and did not raise fact issue on reckless disregard
A.