With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". has provided that child with necessaries, then the parent is liable to that other person. Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 151.003(c) (Vernon 1995); see also Interest of M.W.T., 12 S.W.3d 598 (Tex.App.— San Antonio 2000, pet. denied) (citing Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 151.003 (Vernon 1995)). Any person who provides necessaries to a child- may sue to recover from a parent who fails to discharge his duty of support. Office of Att’y Gen. v. Carter, 977 S.W.2d 159, 160-61 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.); see also Bailey v. Bailey, 987 S.W.2d 206, 210 (Tex.App.— Amarillo 1999, no pet.) (defining necessaries to include provisions such as clothing, food, shelter, medical and dental attention, and education); Lawrence v. Cox, 464 S.W.2d 674, 675 (Tex.Civ.App. — Waco 1971, writ dism’d w.o.j.) (<HOLDING>). Appellee had a duty to support W.J.S. until

A: recognizing duty of parent to control conduct of child
B: holding that the doctrine of estoppel embodies the fiction that regardless of biology and the presumption of paternity the person who has cared for the child is the childs parent
C: recognizing that third party may not recover contribution against parent where child has no cause of action against parent for negligent supervision
D: holding any person who has supplied necessities to a child may sue and recover from the childs parent for value of the supplies or services furnished to the child
D.