With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". exemption violates his rights under the South Dakota Constitution and statutes. We do not question his assertion that the South Dakota Constitution guarantees South Dako-tans’ right to a homestead or that South Dakota law permits debtors to claim a homestead exemption in bankruptcy cases; rather, the question here is whether the property in which the Debtor claimed a homestead exemption was, in fact, his homestead. Under well-established South Dakota precedent, because the Debtor removed himself from the Spark Street property with no fixed or actual intent to return, it is no longer his homestead. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Bankruptcy Court did not err in concluding that the Debtor has abandoned 13, 820 (8th Cir. 2010) ("A mere 's Nov. 15, 2006) (not reported) (<HOLDING>); In re Dice, 1997 WL 1125702 at *2

A: holding that debtor who was separated from her husband and who testified that she would only return to the marital home if her husband vacated the house or died or if she was required to care for him or her adult son there or if the couple reconciled was an abandonment of the marital home as her homestead
B: holding that relative to the threat that she posed physically separating tina cortez from her telephone taking her by the arm  escorting her from her home taking the keys to her home and locking the door and  placing her in the locked back seat of a patrol car was excessive force as well as an unlawful seizure under the fourth amendment
C: holding a wife liable for necessary medical expenses incurred by her husband under the doctrine even though the wife did not sign as a guarantor and did not request that her husband be admitted nor anticipate that her husband would be admitted
D: holding admissible a letter which a woman had purportedly written to a judge 2 days before her death stating that her husband had threatened her and she feared him where the defendant husband claimed she had threatened him
A.