With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to the neighbor’s front door. Government Exhibit # 5 shows the garbage cans placed in front of the garage on collection day for pickup. 5 . At one point Redmon's counsel objected to characterizing the garbage cans as garbage cans instead of as some variety of all-purpose plastic containers. That argument appears to have been abandoned, likely because the particular cans looked like garbage cans and- smelled like garbage cans and not like some all-purpose containers. This distinction was noted in our case of United States v. Hedrick, 922 F.2d 396, 399 (7th Cir.1991). 6 . There is another respondent in Greenwood, who is not specifically included in this synopsis as his presence makes no difference for these purposes. 7 . See also United States v. Shanks, 97 F.3d 977, 980 (7th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). COFFEY, Circuit Judge, concurring. I join and

A: holding no reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage placed in trash cans
B: holding that defendant lacked reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage located outside curtilage of home
C: holding that there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of plastic garbage bags left on or at the side of a public street
D: holding that the defendant in that case could not have an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in incriminating evidence when the garbage was in containers readily accessible and visible from public thoroughfares
D.