With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that is required to exercise the right of rescission. The problem with this argument is that, in a significant number of instances, the remedial economy of the remedy would be jeopardized. See [Andrew Kull, Rescission and Restitution, 61 Bus. Law. 569, 577 (2006) ]. Specifically, it is self-evident that when a borrower who has provided notice to a creditor decides later — at some unknown, and perhaps distant, point in the future — to effectuate the rescission right through judicial process, the underlying circumstances in no small number . of cases are likely to have changed significantly. Just to provide one example: new actors may have come onto the field post-transaction and obtained some interest in the loan or the underlying property. Cf. Beach, 523 U.S. at 418-19, 118 S.Ct. 1408 (<HOLDING>). And, as a consequence of this reality,

A: holding that the 3year limit is a period of repose
B: recognizing that tilas statute of repose acts to limit the clouding of a propertys title
C: holding that the title of the statute did not limit the reach of the statute
D: holding that statute of repose acts as an outer limit or ceiling within which all suits must be brought
B.