With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". appeal. II. Discussion A. Challenge to Court’s Statutory Authority 1. Standard of Review Harris submits that, because the actions a court may take under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) are stated in the disjunctive “or,” the district court was not statutorily authorized to revoke his supervision based on the same conduct—narcotics trafficking—that had earlier prompted it to modi-fiy the conditidns of his supervision by adding a search condition. While ordinarily we review questions of statutory interpretation de novo, see United States v. Cassesse, 685 F.3d 186, 188 (2d Cir. 2012), our review here is for plain error because Harris failed to assert the challenge in the district court, see Fed. R. Crira. P. 52(b); United States v. Marcus, 560 U.S. 258, 262, 130 S.Ct. 2159, 176 L.Ed.2d 1012 (2010) (<HOLDING>); accord United States v. Rodriguez, 775 F.3d

A: holding that a plain error did not seriously affect the fairness integrity or public reputation of the judicial proceedings even though the error was assumed to have affected substantial rights
B: holding that plain error will be identified only if 1 there is error 2 that is clear or obvious rather than subject to reasonable dispute 3 that affects defendants substantial rights and 4 that seriously impugns fairness integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings
C: holding that plain error exists when 1 an error was committed 2 that was plain 3 that affected the defendants substantial rights and 4 the error seriously affects the fairness integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings
D: holding that even if a defendant is able to show that there was a plain error that affected his substantial rights a court of appeals is not required to reverse a conviction unless it finds that the error seriously affected the fairness integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings
B.