With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". original jurisdiction under 5 V.I.Code § 1303 over territorial habeas petitions. The case had nothing to do with the District Court’s appellate jurisdiction under 4 V.I.Code § 33 over territorial habeas petitions. See 48 U.S.C. § 1613a(a) (“[T]he District Court of the Virgin Islands shall have such appellate jurisdiction over the courts of the Virgin Islands established by local law to the extent now or hereafter prescribed by local law_”); 4 V.I.Code § 33 (granting, pursuant to 48 U.S.C. § 1613a(a), appellate jurisdiction to the District Court “to review the judgments and orders of the [Superior Court] in all ... civil cases and criminal cases in which the defendant has been convicted, other than on a plea of guilty”); Gov’t of Virgin Islands v. Warner, 48 F.3d 688, 692 (3d Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). Nor can Callwood’s holding be extended to

A: holding that the limitation act does not apply to claims brought under the clean water act
B: holding that under the revised organic act 4 vicode  33s limitation on cases involving guilty pleas does not preclude appellate jurisdiction over such cases where colorable constitutional claims are raised
C: holding that a bankruptcy court does not have exclusive jurisdiction over third party claims against nondebtor parties as such claims are not cases under title 11
D: holding that the court of appeals has jurisdiction over murder cases under the constitution even if thornton directs such cases to be transferred to the supreme court
B.