With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". As a prerequisite to filing a civil action charging age discrimination, an aggrieved party must first file a charge with the EEOC. In a “deferral” state, like Virginia, this charge must be filed no later than 300 days “after the alleged unlawful practice occurred....” 29 U.S.C. § 626(d)(2). The prospective plaintiff must then wait sixty days before filing a lawsuit, 29 U.S.C. § 626(d), but he has no more than ninety days following the EEOC’s issuance of his right-to-sue-notice in which to file the action. The ninety-day requirement operates as a statute of limitations that bars subsequently filed suits. The timing requirements for filing a lawsuit following an EEOC right-to-sue notice have been strictly construed. See Harvey v. City of New Bern Police Dep’t, 813 F.2d 652 (4th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>); Boyce v. Fleet Finance Inc., 802 F.Supp. 1404

A: holding suit filed ninetyone days after notice untimely
B: holding that notice provisions of rcra and cwa were satisfied where proper parties had notice in fact of the alleged violations more than 60 days before suit was filed
C: holding  1330a motion untimely when filed over 180 days from confirmation
D: holding that severance motion to permit exculpatory testimony of codefendant filed nine days after start of trial was untimely
A.