With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Inc., 433 F.3d 73, 80 (1st Cir.2005) (citing Uncle Henry’s, Inc. v. Plaut Consulting Co., 399 F.3d 33, 41 (1st Cir.2005)), the Trust urges that summary judgment was appropriate because the Trust was not engaged in trade or commerce, based on its status as a nonprofit corporation. We agree. In Massachusetts, a defendant’s nonprofit status is not dispositive of whether it can be liable under Chapter 93A. Compare Linkage Corp. v. Trs. of Boston Univ., 425 Mass. 1, 679 N.E.2d 191, 207 n. 34 (1997) (noting that Massachusetts courts have held nonprofit corporations lia ble under Chapter 93A) (citing Miller v. Risk Mgmt. Found. of the Harvard Med. Insts., Inc., 36 Mass.App.Ct. 411, 632 N.E.2d 841 (1994)), with Poznik v. Mass. Med. Prof'l Ins. Ass’n., 417 Mass. 48, 628 N.E.2d 1, 3-4 (1994) (<HOLDING>), and All Seasons Servs., Inc. v. Comm’r of

A: holding that judgment as a matter of law was proper when the plaintiff did not present any evidence that the defendant was motivated by the eeoc complaint knowledge is necessary to establish causation but it is not sufficient
B: holding that the right of access to government information or sources of information within the governments control is not mandated by the first or fourteenth amendments
C: holding that information was voluntarily provided to the government which mandated the critical mass test
D: holding that mmpia was not engaged in trade or commerce because of its character as a statutorily mandated nonprofit association that was motivated by legislative mandate not business or personal reasons citing barrett v mass insurers insolvency fund 412 mass 774 592 ne2d 1317 1319 1992
D.