With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". whether the DOC’s policies requiring all of the ISC’s commitments to undergo a visual strip and body cavity search comports with the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches. Upon careful review of the stipulated facts and relevant policies, the Court finds those policies to be unconstitutional. Any analysis of the policies in issue necessarily begins with Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979). In that case, the Supreme Court of the United States considered whether a policy requiring pretrial detainees at a federal detention facility to expose their body cavities to visual inspection after contact visits with persons outside the institution was constitutional. Id. at 558, 99 S.Ct. 1861. In holding that the policy did not (7th Cir.1983)(<HOLDING>); Logan v. Shealy, 660 F.2d 1007 (4th

A: holding unconstitutional city policy of subjecting all females arrested and detained to strip and visual body cavity searches
B: holding a visual strip and visual cavity search unreasonable when done beside a police car
C: holding that prison officials may conduct visual body cavity searches in a reasonable manner
D: holding probable cause to be required for strip and visual body cavity searches
A.