With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". “judgment.” As an initial matter, we must determine whether we have jurisdiction oyer this appeal. Goeddertz v. Parchen, 299 Or 277, 279, 701 P2d 781 (1985). Appeals from a trial court sitting in probate are taken in the same manner as those from a trial court generally. ORS 111.105(2); Goeddertz, 299 Or at 279. In Goeddertz, the personal representative sought to appeal from an “order directing [the] personal representative to pay an allowed claim” and a “judgment-order on hearing on objections to final account.” 299 Or judgment from being entered against appellants; rather, the interim order that appellants seek to challenge can be reviewed on appeal from the decree of final distribution. See ORS 116.113(4). Compare Amundson v. Brookshire, 133 Or App 450, 453, 891 P2d 710 (1995) (<HOLDING>). The document from which appellants seek to

A: holding that an amendment by a plaintiff to allege a claim in her representative capacity as adminis trator of estate under federal law related back to claims brought in her individual capacity under state law such an amendment was not equivalent to the commencement of a new cause of action so as to subject the amendment to the statute of limitations
B: holding that personal representative may amend personal injury suit to state wrongful death claim following plaintiffs death
C: holding that an order removing the personal representative is appealable under ors 192052 because it both affects the persons substantial rights and prevents entry of a judgment or decree as to that person in his or her capacity as a personal representative
D: holding that a pension plan participants son not designated a beneficiary lacked standing to maintain an erisa action in both his individual capacity and his capacity as the representative of the deceased participants estate
C.