With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 68, 71 (2d Cir.1975), United States law enforcement agencies “can hardly be expected to monitor the conduct of representatives of each foreign government to assure that a request for extradition or expulsion is carried out in accordance with American constitutional standards.” Indeed, as stated above, the purpose of the rule that any statement taken in violation of Miranda is inadmissible is to prevent and deter United States law enforcement personnel from taking involuntary statements that are the result of unduly coercive custodial circumstances. This rationale cannot be applied to foreign countries since the law enforcement agencies would not be affected by the application of the exclusionary rule by a United States Court. See United States v. Welch, 455 F.2d 211, 212 (2d Cir.1972) (<HOLDING>). Any request that Yousef made of the Pakistani

A: holding to the same effect
B: recognizing that defendant may waive miranda rights
C: recognizing states have power to establish voting requirements
D: recognizing that the miranda requirements have little if any deterrent effect upon foreign police
D.