With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". before entering the intersection and specifically declined to characterize Hallett’s conduct as “reckless.” Section 546.001(2) provides that an emergency vehicle operator responding to an emergency call is allowed to proceed against a red traffic light after slowing for safe operation. See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 546.001(2). No evidence was presented that Hallett failed to slow down or stop before entering the intersection. As noted, the video recording shows Hallett’s vehicle slowing as it approaches the intersection. We disagree with Price’s conclusion that Hallett violated the statute simply because a collision occurred. We hold that Price’s conclusion is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Hallett acted recklessly. See Smith, 126 S.W.3d at 546 (<HOLDING>); see also City of Laredo v. Varela, No.

A: holding evidence that officer entered the intersection against red light insufficient to raise fact issue as to whether he acted recklessly
B: holding no evidence of reckless disregard for safety of others when officer entered intersection without stopping and witness did not hear brakes being applied
C: holding that written reprimand stating that officer failed to exercise due care and failed to comply with section 546005 were evidence that officer only acted negligently and did not raise fact issue on reckless disregard
D: holding officers failure to adhere to policy requiring emergency vehicles to come to complete stop and failure to remember looking both ways before entering intersection did not raise fact issue as to whether officer acted in conscious indifference to or reckless disregard for safety of others
A.