With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is of “limited significance in determining reasonable suspicion ...” and that “ ‘in all cases of this kind must be treated with caution. It is common knowledge that most citizens, ... whether innocent or guilty, when confronted by a law enforcement officer ... are likely to exhibit some signs of nervousness.’ ” Fernandez, 18 F.3d at 878 (quoting United States v. Millan-Diaz, 975 F.2d 720, 722 (10th Cir.1992)); see also United States v. Peters, 10 F.3d 1517, 1521 (10th Cir.1993) (“While a person’s nervous behavior may be relevant, we are wary of the objective suspicion supplied by generic claims that a[d]efendant was nervous or exhibited nervous behavior after being confronted by law enforcement officials.”); see also United States v. Wald, 216 F.3d 1222, 1227 (10th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). In addition, the court has stated that a

A: holding that while nervousness may be considered as part of the totality of circumstances nervousness standing alone was insufficient to expand a terry stop into an inquiry into drug activity
B: holding nervousness is of limited significance in determining whether reasonable suspicion exists
C: holding defendants nervousness in part presented officer with reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity
D: holding that reasonable suspicion existed based on defendants nervousness expired drivers license and suspicious story regarding travel plans
B.