With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the court had to reset the hearing for June 28, 2010. See Exs. 1.098 & 17. 92 . Ex. 1.098. 93 . Ex.2. 94 . See Exs.I & K. 95 . Ex. 3. 96 . Ex. 4. 97 . Ex. 5. 98 . Ex. 3 at 1538-49. 99 . Ex. 1.094. 100 . Ex. 1.102. 101 . Ex. 1.102. 102 . Ex. 1.121. 103 . Ex. 10 at 1661-64. 104 . Ex. 1.125. On January 9, 2012, Respondent proposed a payment plan of $500.00 per month. 105 . See Exs. 1.126 & 1.129. 106 . Ex. 1.129 at 1288. 107 . Ex. 1.129 at 1290. 108 . Ex. 1.130; Ex. 1.147. 109 . Compl. 105; Answer 105. 110 . The People's claims encompass Respondent's statements about his tax returns from 2006 through 2008, but we determine the People have not proved that Respondent made any misrepresentations regarding his 2008 tax returns. We find that it was not clear which years wer 31, 52 (Okla.2004) (<HOLDING>). 114 . See Black's Law Dictionary 271 (8th

A: holding that false arrest and false imprisonment claim were not duplicative
B: holding that false statements are constitutionally protected
C: holding that defendant could be charged for making false statements to treasury officials under the tax evasion statute or the statute prohibiting false statements to government officials
D: holding that an attorney who made false representations to a court did not violate okla rpc 33 because that rule addresses professional misconduct as an advocate for making false statements to a tribunal not false statements by a lawyer as a witness
D.