With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1710. In relevant part, § 1710(a)(2)(G) provides: The Secretary ... shall furnish hospital care and medical services ... which the Secretary determines to be needed to any veteran ... who is unable to defray the expenses of necessary care as determined under section 1722(a) of this title. Applying its own precedent, the Veterans Court held that, although a veteran may be entitled to receive hospital care and medical services in a VA hospital under § 1710, “that section does not contain any provision which would authorize the Secretary to provide reimbursement to a veteran for services rendered at a non-VA facility.” Kavanaugh, slip op. at 4, 2007 WL 716029, at *3 (emphasis added) (quoting Zimick v. West, 11 Vet.App. 45, 50 (1998)); see also Malone v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 539, 543 (1997) (<HOLDING>). The plain language of § 1710 makes no

A: holding that this court lacked preliminary authority to review the district courts jurisdiction because there was no immediately appealable order before the court
B: holding that we lacked jurisdiction to review the veterans courts determination that equitable tolling did not apply in the case before it
C: holding superior court lacked authority to remand to commission
D: holding that veterans court lacked authority to create reimbursement remedy from language of  1710
D.