With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Because we can find no genuine issues of material fact, we conclude that, based on the applicable precedent, defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on this record. B. ANALYSIS 1. Legal Standards The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits the taking of private property for public use without just compensation. U.S. ConstAmend. V. Generally, the applicable precedent recognizes two types of compensable takings. Golden Pac. Bancorp v. United States, 15 F.3d 1066, 1071-72 (Fed.Cir.1994). First, government action which effects a physical invasion of private property or which amounts to a permanent occupation thereof arises to a taking under the Constitution. See, e.g., Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419, 102 S.Ct. 3164, 73 L.Ed.2d 868 (1982) (<HOLDING>). This type of regulatory action is

A: holding the claimant established by clear and convincing evidence that her depression was caused by her compensable physical injury
B: holding the installation of catv facilities on plaintiffs property to be a physical taking
C: holding that a new york law which required a landlord to permit a cable television company to install its cable facilities on his property was a taking
D: holding that the physical occupation caused by the mandatory installation of cable television equipment was a compensable taking
D.