With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by an attorney in the family court, as were these parties) who is dissatisfied with the outcome of a child custody battle knows that there is very little likelihood that a family court will change its decision when reminded of its obligation to make specific findings, and few will pursue that route if not required to do so before seeking appellate review. Instead, this opinion permits a litigant who loses in the trial court to simply appeal and try to secure a more favorable outcome before a different judge when the child custody determination is inevitably vacated and the case remanded. At a time when the Arizona Supreme Court has recently limited the use of this type of litigation tactic in criminal cases, see State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, 567, ¶ 19, 115 P.3d 601, 607 (2005) (<HOLDING>), we should not expand its use in civil cases.

A: holding that defendant forfeits right to have issue considered on appeal when he fails to object to misconduct at trial
B: holding that a defendant who fails to object to an error at a plea colloquy hearing must satisfy the plain error rule
C: holding that where a defendant fails to challenge his plea in district court he must establish plain error
D: holding that a defendant who fails to object to trial error forfeits his right to appellate review unless he can establish fundamental error
D.