With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and William Darby challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support their convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Id, at 126, 578 A.2d 283. Applying the Folk factors as to constructive possession, this Court said: Significantly, in the case sub judice, three of the above elements are present. When the police executed the raid, they found appellants within several feet of a table laden with cocaine and packaging paraphernalia. The cocaine and accompanying paraphernalia were not secreted away, and one could not conclude, by any stretch of the imagination, that appellants were unaware of its presence. The house was one from which the police had observed a man exit on several occasions to conduct drug transactions. The d 986 (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 390 Md. 285, 888 A.2d 342

A: holding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that the defendant a front seat passenger of a vehicle occupied by three individuals was in constructive possession of marijuana found in white bag directly under the defendants seat
B: holding that search of area under front passenger seat of a validly stopped vehicle was justified for officer safety
C: holding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that the juvenile a front seat passenger of a vehicle occupied by four persons was in possession of marijuana recovered from a crumpled piece of newspaper behind the drivers seat
D: holding that evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction of front seat passenger of possession with intent to distribute marijuana in paper bag in foot well of volkswagen on passengers side near gearshift in presence of marijuana smoke
A.