With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". from presenting evidence to prove that she did not understand the C & R agreement. In the present case, WCJ Colohan did consider the evidence presented by Claimant and found that Claimant successfully proved her lack of understanding of the C & R Agreement. In reviewing and reversing WCJ Colohan’s decision, the WCAB did not overturn this finding but, instead, concluded that WCJ Colohan committed legal error in setting aside the C & R Agreement based on unilateral mistake. Now, rather than confine its analysis to a review of WCJ Colohan’s findings and conclusions, the majority essentially rules that WCJ Colohan improperly allowed Claimant to present evidence of her understanding of the C & R Agreement in the first instance. I find this holding difficult to reconcile with Dillard (<HOLDING>). As I stated in my dissent in Stiles, I

A: recognizing that court has inherent power to control the judicial business before it
B: holding the court has the inherent authority to enter an order of confidentiality
C: recognizing inherent power of courts of appeals
D: holding that even after the appeal period has expired a wcj has the inherent power to set aside an approved c  r agree ment under certain circumstances
D.