With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the adjudication of guilt in this cause. Judgment Adjudicating Guilt, signed Feb. 1, 1999 (hereinafter “second judgment”), at 1-2. Petitioner did not appeal from the first judgment, with the consequence that his right to direct review by any state appellate court expired thirty days later, making the first judgment final on April 27, 1996. Tex.R.App. PROC. 26.2 (West 1995); Tex.Code crim. Proc. art. 42.12 § 23(b) (West 1995); United States v. Vasquez, 298 F.3d 354, 359 (5th Cir.2002) (finding a deferred adjudication probation and revocation of that probation becomes final for federal enhancement purposes when time for filing notice of appeal passes or if appealed, when appeal is affirmed and no further review is possible); Manuel v. Texas, 994 S.W.2d 658, 661-62 (Tex.Crim.App.1999) (<HOLDING>). Petitioner filed two state writ applications

A: holding that under texas law a defendant placed on deferred adjudication community supervision may raise issues relating to the original plea proceeding  only in appeals taken when deferred adjudication community supervision is first imposed
B: holding that the procedure provided for deferred adjudication is different from the other type or types of probation
C: holding that complaint from original plea is required to be raised in appeal from trial courts order placing appellant on deferred adjudication community supervision
D: holding that a guilty plea for which the defendant received a deferred adjudication counted as a conviction under federal law for purposes of ussg  4b11
A.