With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1128 (Colo.1986); Nettrour v. J.C. Penney Co., 146 Colo. 150, 156, 360 P.2d 964, 967 (1961). B. The issue before the trial court on directed verdict was whether Mariam had presented a prima facie case for wrongful discharge under Martin Marietta v. Lorenz, 823 P.2d 100 (Colo.1992). The elements of a wrongful discharge claim under Lorenz can be summarized as follows: (1) the employer directed the employee to perform an illegal act as part of the employee’s duties; (2) the action directed by the employer would violate a statute or clearly expressed public policy; (3) the employee was terminated as a result of refusing to perform the illegal act; and (4) the employer was aware or should have been aware that the employee’s refusal was based upon the employee’s reasonable be 588 (1986) (<HOLDING>). 9 . Compare Cronk v. Intermountain Rural

A: holding that a motion to intervene is not dispositive of a claim or defense of a party
B: holding that absence of statutory directive is not dispositive of whether there is a public policy against the directive
C: holding that whether or not defendants are holders of the note is not dispositive as to whether they have standing to foreclose on the property
D: holding plaintiffs appeal of the denial of a preliminary injunction moot where defendants directive no longer in effect
B.