With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". appeared safe, and did not move until struck by Atropos Island four hours later. There was no evidence that Cynthia’s crew was negligent during the four hours Cynthia was next to the docks. Indeed, Weyerhaeuser’s own expert witness testified that Cynthia’s crew would have been negligent if they had attempted to move the ship away from the docks. Nevertheless, Weyerhaeuser argues that Cynthia should be liable for damages from the second allisions because Cynthia’s negligence created a foreseeable risk of harm to the docks, and the allision of Atropos Island resulted from the same force — the severe wind — that rendered Cynthia’s conduct negligent. See Petition of Kinsman Transit Co., 338 F.2d 708, 723-26 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 944, 85 S.Ct. 1026, 13 L.Ed.2d 963 (1965) (<HOLDING>). Weyerhaeuser also relies on the principle

A: holding defendant liable for unforeseeably severe damages when some harm was foreseeable and the damages resulted from the same risks that rendered the defendants conduct negligent
B: holding that conduct must be beyond the fraud which supported compensatory damages to award punitive damages
C: holding that a plaintiff may receive both treble damages under rico and state law punitive damages for the same course of conduct
D: recognizing recovery under common law for tort damages that are proven to be reasonably foreseeable damages of ones tortious acts
A.