With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in fact holds was rendered so intolerable that she was compelled to quit. Indeed, Petrosino’s complaint that her supervisory responsibilities in I & R were reduced pending her transfer to CX & M would not support her constructive discharge claim. In Pena v. Brattleboro Retreat, we reversed a jury verdict in favor of a nursing home administrator who claimed that her employer’s decision to accelerate transfer of her supervisory authority to her successor compelled her to resign. 702 F.2d 322, 325-26 (2d Cir.1983). As in this case, there was no evidence that the employer wished the employee to resign her position. Nor did the conduct at issue cause the employee to suffer a loss of pay or change of title. See id.;see also Jett v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 798 F.2d 748, 755 (5th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>); Chisolm v. Kidder, Peabody Asset Mgmt., 966

A: holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion to substitute counsel on the strength of gonzalezs sworn responses at the pleataking that no one was threatening him or forcing him to plead where the defendant alleged that his attorney forced him to plead guilty  and threatened him if he did not take the plea
B: holding consent was given involuntarily when a reasonable person would not have felt they had the choice to withhold consent to search
C: holding that relieving teacher of coaching responsibilities and transferring him to another school did not subject him to conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person would have felt compelled to resign
D: holding that a person is seized when a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave
C.