With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". considering a motion for a new trial, Rule 59(a)(2) provides that “[a]f-ter a nonjury trial, the court may ... open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony, amend findings of fact and conclusions of law or make new ones, and direct the entry of a new judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a)(2). Rule 9023 requires that, the motion be filed within 14 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9023; see also Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9001(7) (defining “Judgment” to mean “any appealable order”). The plain language of Rule 59(a)(2) indicates that a motion under that rule may be brought for many purposes, including seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. 11 Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 2808 (3d ed.); see also Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154 (5th Cir. 1990) (<HOLDING>). When considering a Rule 59(a)(2) motion

A: holding that in order to qualify as newly discovered evidence the evidence must have been in existence and hidden at the time of judgment
B: holding that posttrial discovery of asserted newly discovered evidence did not satisfy the requirement that the evidence must be such as with reasonable diligence could not have been discovered and produced at trial
C: holding that a rule 59a motion must clearly establish either a manifest error of law or fact or must present newly discovered evidence and cannot be used to raise arguments which could and should have been made before the judgment was issued
D: holding that a party cannot use a rule 59e motion to relitigate old matters raise argument or present evidence that could have been raised prior to the entry of judgment
C.