With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is de novo.” Volusia Cty. v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So.2d 126, 130 (Fla.2000). The Davids’ wárranty deed includes a gulf-to-sound pedestrian easement that makes no mention of the dock on Parcel A. And while the Davids’ warranty deed states that the property was “[subject to current taxes, easements and restrictions of record,” it is undisputed that the Declaration and the purported dock easement in that Declaration were not yet “of record” when the deed was delivered to the Davids. The Davids took title to Parcel A at the earliest fifty days before Ip- polite recorded the Declaration or at thé latest forty minutes before Ippolite recorded the Declaration. See Sweat v. Yates, 468 So.2d 306, 307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) & Commercial, Inc., 954 So.2d 758, 764 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (<HOLDING>). We further conclude that the Declaration does

A: holding that scope of property subject to forfeiture is defined by the instrument creating an interest in the property
B: holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
C: recognizing that purchaser may be charged with notice of an unrecorded property interest and therefore bound by the unrecorded property interest
D: holding that any property in which the taxpayer has any right title or interest is subject to foreclosure proceeding including property in which others claim an interest so long as all persons having liens or claiming any interest in the property are joined as parties to the suit
C.