With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or investigatory proceedings have arisen that may circumscribe the individual’s asserted need for the materials. [102 N.J. at 113, 505 A.2d 958.] “As we noted, the court should balance ‘[ajgainst these and any other relevant factors * * * the importance of the information sought to the plaintiffs vindication of the public interest.’ ” South Jersey Publishing, supra, 124 N.J. at 488, 591 A.2d 921 (quoting Loigman, supra, 102 N.J. at 113, 505 A.2d 958). In its balancing, a court might find it necessary to compel production of the sought-after records and conduct an in camera review thereof. Ibid.; see Loigman, supra, 102 N.J. at 106, 505 A.2d 958 (stating that “implicit in the concept [of an in camera review] is a judicial weighing of that showing 573, 583, 610 A.2d 903 (App.Div.) (<HOLDING>), certif. denied, 133 N.J. 429, 627 A.2d 1135

A: holding that an individuals bodily integrity was violated where a citizen was beaten to death while in police custody
B: holding wife did not have a duty to warn a police officer who was shot while escorting her home that her husband had threatened to kill any police officer
C: holding that if a police officer inflicted no constitutional injury on a suspect it is inconceivable that the police commissioners could be liable to the suspect
D: holding that newspaper had sufficient interest to obtain access to police investigative files and autopsy report regarding suspect who had been shot to death while in police custody
D.