With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". its services in commerce. See OBH, 86 F.Supp.2d at 186; Planned Parenthood, 1997 WL 133313 at *3. The court considers each of Plaintiffs assertions in turn. 1. Hyperlinks The use of a plaintiffs trademark as the domain name for a website satisfies the “commercial use” requirement if the website contains a hyperlink that connects users to another of a defendant’s websites if it operates for “commercial purposes.” See OBH, 86 F.Supp.2d at 185-86. However, where a “website contain[s] no commercial links, but rather contain[s] links to a [website], which in turn contain[s] advertising” or has a commercial purpose, this does not satisfy the “commercial use requirement of the statute.” See Bosley Medical, 403 F.3d at 678; see also TMI, Inc. v. Maxwell, 368 F.3d 433, 435, 438 (5th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); see also Taubman Co. v. Webfeats, 319 F.3d

A: holding that a competitive commercial purpose is not of itself improper
B: holding that the commercial use requirement is not satisfied where defendants site itself had no outside links
C: holding but for requirement not satisfied where investigation had no unique special factual features that but for the requirement of the act would have permitted a quick termination if the investigation were conducted outside the act
D: holding that there is nothing improper with defendants purchase of sponsored links when defendants actually sell plaintiffs products  on their website
B.