With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the extent to which notice and an opportunity for hearing are required under Civil Rule 95(a). However, we are requesting our Standing Advisory Committee on Civil Rules to consider this question. 47 . Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 767, 100 S.Ct. 2455, 65 L.Ed.2d 488 (1980) (concluding that federal courts possess "inherent power” to-assess contempt sanctions). After the Supreme Court decided Roadway, Congress amended 28 U.S.C. § 1927 to provide that a court may assess attorney’s fees against an attorney. 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (2000); see Morris v. Adams-Millis Corp., 758 F.2d 1352, 1357 n. 7 (10th Cir.1985). 48 . Id. at 767 n. 14, 100 S.Ct. 2455. 49 . Lashbrook v. Lashbroolc, 957 P.2d 326, 328 (Alaska 1998). 50 . Cf. Brady v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Cos., 484 A.2d 566 (D.C.1984) (<HOLDING>). 51 . Wilson, 977 P.2d at 727. 52 . This date

A: holding that trial court erred by imposing sanctions against attorney without notice and hearing but error was cured by attorneys subsequent challenge to sanctions
B: holding that an order imposing sanctions against an attorney for one of the parties in a pending case is final and therefore immediately appealable by the attorney
C: holding trial court abused discretion by assessing sanctions without supporting evidence
D: holding sanctions order not final where the amount of sanctions had not yet been determined
A.