With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". In re Plummer, the court allowed a debtor to strip off a condo association’s lien and stated that no matter the specific definitional category in which condominium assessment liens fall, there is no question but that an assessment lien is a charge against the condominium owner’s property to secure performance of the owner’s obligation to pay assessments. As such, condominium assessment liens squarely fall within the Bankruptcy Code’s definition of liens and are subject to the application of Bankruptcy Code section 506. To hold otherwise would be to give condominium associations a special status under the bankruptcy laws that is not set forth in the Bankruptcy Code. 484 B.R. 882, 889 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2013); see also In re Aliu-Otokiti, 2013 WL 1163782, at *3 (Bankr.M.D.Fla. Mar. 19, 2013) (<HOLDING>). Hillcrest argues that In re Raymond is

A: holding that a wholly unsecured junior mortgage lien can be avoided under nobelman
B: holding that in light of the statutory framework created by the code  522f lien avoidance cannot be made subject to any subsequent event
C: holding that because creditors claim was unsecured after application of section 506a and because section 1325a5 does not apply to unsecured claims creditors lien could properly be avoided
D: holding that a condo associations secondpriority lien was unsecured and subject to avoidance under  506
D.