With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Finally, defendant claims a violation of his Confrontation Clause rights under Chapter I, Article 10 of the Vermont Constitution and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. ¶ 19. First we address defendant’s claim of error under the Rules of Evidence. As noted earlier, our review of a trial court’s evidentiary rulings is, in general, deferential, and reversal is warranted only upon an abuse of discretion. Jackson, 2008 VT 71, ¶ 9. This case presents a different problem because defense counsel voluntarily agreed to not recall T.S. and to play the recorded statements instead. By agreeing to admission of certain evidence, a party waives his right to review of the trial court’s ruling on appeal. See State v. Poutre, 154 Vt. 531, 535, 581 A.2d 731, 734 (1990) (<HOLDING>); see also State v. Laprade, 2008 VT 83, ¶ 11,

A: holding that the defendant waived the right to challenge a suppression ruling on appeal
B: holding that the defendant waived the issue on appeal when he failed to contemporaneously object to the admission of such evidence at trial
C: recognizing the right to counsel on appeal
D: holding that when defense counsel withdrew an objection to admission of evidence the defendant waived his right to a review of the courts ruling on appeal
D.