With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". zone and contrary to a Board agent’s direct instructions. Nathan Katz, 251 F.3d at 992-93; Star Expansion Industries, 170 NLRB at 365; Detroit Creamery, 60 NLRB at 180. The cases the Employer cites do show that electioneering near a polling place can interfere with employees’ free choice under certain conditions. Nevertheless, under some circumstances the Board has determined that electioneering in the vicinity of a polling place has not interfered with employees’ free choice. Boston Insulated Wire & Cable v. NLRB, 703 F.2d 876, 882 (5th Cir.1983) (refusing to set aside election results where electioneering was conducted directly outside entrance to building but not in a no-electioneering zone or contrary to the instructions of the Board agent); J.P. Transportation, 1998 WL 869984 (<HOLDING>); Chrill Care, Inc., 340 NLRB No. 123, 2003 WL

A: holding that party agents conversation with arriving voters in parking lot outside of polling place did not appear substantially to have impaired the employees free choice in the election
B: holding that an injury occurring in a parking lot which was leased but not controlled by an employer was compensable because the employer instructed its employees to park in that lot
C: holding that injury in a parking lot did not occur on a covered situs
D: holding that the prisoner should have been allowed to choose whether to leave his car parked in a public parking lot
A.