With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". imprisonment, after considering the factors set forth in [18 U.S.C.] section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” § 3582(c)(2). The Sentencing Commission’s policy statements provide that, unless the defendant was originally sentenced to a term that was less than the applicable guideline range at the time of sentencing, a reduction pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) shall not be' less than the minimum of the amended guidelines range. U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(A)-(B) & comment, (n.3). This Court has recently rejected Nealy’s argument that the district court has the authority to sentence below the amended guideline range. United States v. Melvin, 556 F.3d 1190, 1192-93 (11th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, the decision of the district court

A: holding that  3582c2 does not authorize a resentencing but merely provides for a sentence reduction within the bounds established by the sentencing commission and that booker does not apply to  3582c2 proceedings
B: holding that the rules governing criminal cases apply to  3582c2 proceedings
C: holding that booker and kimbrough do not apply at resentencing proceedings under  3582c2
D: holding that booker and kimbrough do not apply to  3582c2 proceedings and that booker and kimbrough do not prohibit the limitations on a judges discretion in reducing a sentence imposed by  3582c2 and the applicable policy statement by the sentencing commission
D.