With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". policy, which specifically states that the application form is incorporated into the terms of the policy. See Gulf Policy, p. 1. The proposal form itself confirms the parties’ intent that it be part of the policy. It provides, “It is agreed by the Company and the Insured Persons that the particulars and statements contained in the Proposal Form and any information provided herewith ... are the basis of this Policy and are to be considered as incorporated in and constituting a part of this Policy.” Great American Proposal Form, p. 4. Ohio case law holds that language of this sort shows “unambiguously” that applications and any attached forms are incorporated into the actual policy. See Winston v. Illinois Nat’l Ins. Co., No. C000251, 2001 WL 395154, at *3 (Ohio Ct.App. Apr. 20, 2001) (<HOLDING>); Personal Serv. Ins. Co. v. Lester, No.

A: holding that the first prong of the boggs test is satisfied when as here the policy includes an application that contains unambiguous language linking back to the policy
B: holding that absent follow form language provision that excess policy would continue as underlying policy did not impose coverage as provided in underlying policy
C: holding that first part of boggs test was satisfied where purported warranty language appeared in the declarations to the policy
D: holding that the plain meaning of the uim policy language was clear and not contrary to public policy
A.