With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the issue. Varnado, 920 F.2d at 321. Wiggins also asserts that defense counsel improperly obtained and introduced into evidence mental health records in an effort to prejudice the jury. Wiggins contends that he was prejudiced by the tendency of the evidence to show that he was incompetent and that he had been treated for sexual aggression against children. Contrary to Wiggins’s assertion, his prison medical file did contain documents pertaining to his treatment for a psychological disorder; and Wiggins admitted at trial that defense counsel had access to his prison medical file. Furthermore, Wiggins’s testimony with regard to the type of mental disorder from which he was suffering opened the door to defense counsel’s questioning. United States v. Delk, 586 F.2d 513, 516 (5th Cir.1978)(<HOLDING>). Wiggins’s argument that the trial court

A: holding that defense counsels failure to object to testimony did not warrant a new trial because there was no prejudice from admission of the testimony
B: holding that counsel was not ineffective in failing to present mental mitigation that would have opened the door to testimony that the defendant was a sadistic sexual psychopath
C: holding that defendant cannot object to counsels attempt to rebut proposition once defendant has opened door to line of testimony
D: holding that defense counsel opened the door to the prosecutions questioning of the defendant about prior convictions when defense counsel asked a prosecution witness whether he was aware that the defendant was  a convicted felon
C.