With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". tolling the statute of limitations, Plaintiffs argue the discovery rule prevented their strict liability causes of action from accruing until at a time later than immediately after the accident. Under the discovery rule, a product liability cause of action does not accrue until two elements are met: “(1) a cognizable physical manifestation of the disease or injury, and (2) evidence of a causal connection between the injury or disease and the defendant’s product, act, or omission.” Hildebrandt v. Allied Corp., 839 F.2d 396, 398 (8th Cir.1987). Although there is some tension between Hildebrandt and certain Minnesota state court decisions, federal courts in this district have continued to apply the discovery rule. Compare MacRae v. Grp. Health Plan, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 711, 719 (Minn.2008) (<HOLDING>) with Huggins, 932 F.Supp.2d at 985 (holding

A: recognizing that a cause of action accrues when a reasonably diligent plaintiff ascertains the nature and cause of his injury
B: holding that a cause of action for breach of contract accrues at the time of the breach
C: holding that a cause of action for an unconstitutional taking accrues at the time the taking occurs
D: holding cause of action accrues when some compensable damage occurs
D.