With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". evidence. Officer Tripp then took Baldon’s car keys and searched Baldon’s car. He discovered a large quantity of marijuana. After Tripp read Baldón his Miranda rights at the police station, Baldón confessed he had received the marijuana in satisfaction of a debt. The State charged Baldón with possession of a schedule I controlled substance with intent to deliver, second or subsequent offense, under Iowa Code sections 124.411 and 902.8 (2009) and possession of an amount of marijuana greater than 42.5 grams in violation of Iowa Code chapter 453B. Baldón moved to suppress the marijuana seized from the search of his vehicle under both the Iowa and Federal Constitutions. He claimed the entry into his motel room and vehicle violated the Search and S 31, 371 N.E.2d 794, 798 (1977) (<HOLDING>); Sullivan v. Bunting, 133 Ohio St.3d 31, 975

A: holding the parolees signature on parole agreement is not to be taken as an unrestricted consent to any and all searches whatsoever or as a blanket waiver of all constitutional rights to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures
B: holding parolees right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was unaffected by his signing of the consent to search provision
C: holding that forfeiture statute is subject to the fourth amendments prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures
D: holding all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the constitution is by that same authority inadmissible in a state court
A.