With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". concludes that such a claim would be barred by sovereign immunity, at least as to any defendants sued in their official capacity, given that Title II does - not expressly authorize suits against the federal government. See Russell, 191 F.3d at 1019. The Court thus concludes that sovereign . immunity does not bar Dr. Coulibaly’s claim under Title I of the FMLA. 3. Personal Jurisdiction “Before a federal court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the procedural requirement of service of summons must be satisfied.” Mwani v. bin Laden, 417 F.3d 1, 8 (D.C.Cir.2005) (citation omitted). A federal official sued in' his personal capacity must be personally served in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e). See Simpkins v. D.C. Gov’t, 108 F.3d 366, 369 (D.C.Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). When a plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis,

A: holding that bivens defendants must be served as individuals pursuant to rule 4e
B: holding that a bivens claim cannot be brought against a federal agency
C: holding that a bivens cause of action cannot be maintained against a federal agency
D: holding that social security regulations and procedures precluded a bivens action
A.