With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". lunch programs at public school and eventually removed them from public school altogether as they became noticeably thinner and constantly sought food. She also punished the boys for eating at school when they were hungry and admitted to using “punishment food,” such as sauerkraut, to discipline the children, even though she denied depriving them of adequate food. The attempts to conceal treatment of the boys, coupled with the testimony of the hospital pediatrician concerning the severity of their malnourishment, permitted the jury to reasonably infer that R.D. and T.D. suffered serious bodily injury because Barbara intentionally and knowingly failed to provide them with adequate nutrition and medical care. See, e.g., Hill v. State, 881 S.W.2d 897, 900-01 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth 1994) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 913 S.W.2d 581 (Tex.Crim.App.1996).

A: holding that before a defendant is entitled to introduce evidence of the victims character for violence there must be sufficient evidence to support a finding that the victim was the first aggressor and that once the defendant testified that he was attacked and cut by the victim without provocation before using the victims utility tool to stab the victim the defendant was clearly entitled to question the victim about past acts of violence reflected in court documents from the state of oregon
B: holding that evidence that the defendant had stalked threatened and assaulted the victim his exgirlfriend was evidence as to the nature of the defendants relationship with the victim and that it was relevant to establish motive
C: holding that evidence was sufficient to support conviction for injury to child by food deprivation where evidence suggested that deprivation occurred over course of several years victims growth chart had flatlined parents ate normal food separately from children and punished victim for attempting to take food from kitchen when hungry and victim was restrained to prevent him from obtaining food without permission and essentially died of starvation
D: holding that evidence was sufficient to support convictions for two counts of armed robbery when money was taken from one victims immediate presence at gunpoint and given to second victim and second victim was then forced to surrender the money to defendant at gunpoint
C.