With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". conclusion, the court summarized the policy underlying the IDEA: The statutory framework of the IDEA and the statute’s purpose show that a five-year statute of limitations would frustrate the federal policy of quick resolution of IDEA claims. The IDEA provides for substantial parental involvement in the IEP [individualized educational program] process, annual reviews, and annual notice to parents of procedural rights. See 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)[ (1) ](B)(i) (parents must be part of IEP team); 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)(4)(A)© (annual review); 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)-(d) (notice of procedural rights). This statutory scheme mandating parental participation in an annual decision-making process demonstrates that Congress intended for parents to be actively implicated in the expeditiou 56 (8th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); Manning, 176 F.3d at 239 (holding that, in

A: holding that the threeyear statute of limitations applicable to  1983 actions in arkansas governed idea claims
B: holding that new york statute of limitations for  1983 actions was three years
C: holding that the applicable statute of limitations in fraudulent conveyance action brought by fdic was a sixyear term for contract actions rather than a threeyear term applicable to actions for money damages founded upon a tort
D: holding that the new jersey statute of limitations applicable to  1983 actions is njsa 2a142
A.