With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". it was shipped to the distributor (in other words, where it ultimately came to rest), see R. 230-7 at 180:20-23, and the fact that neither side has established whether the list shows all sales in the United States or just those to Virginia Tile, the parties agree that the list shows that Blanke USA made thirteen shipments directly to Illinois between 2005 and 2009 for a total sales amount of $16,400. R. 230-7 at 130:12-24. This is neither a large sales amount when compared to the sales of other companies previously subject to personal jurisdiction, nor a high dollar-amount percentage of the approximately $3,852,000 of product sales represented on the list, see R. 253-7 at 19, that was distributed throughout the United States. Cf. Russell v. SNFA, 370 Ill.Dec. 12, 987 N.E.2d 778, (2013) (<HOLDING>). This case is therefore distinguishable on its

A: holding that discussions in illinois leading to contract created jurisdiction
B: holding that jurisdiction was proper because an agent for the defendant made three trips to illinois and the record eontained hundreds of invoices listing rockford illinois  representing multiple shipments of defendants products that totaled approximately 1 million
C: holding there was no personal jurisdiction over nonresident guarantor of equipment lease although payments were made to illinois bank the guaranty was accepted in illinois and it provided that it would be gov erned by illinois law
D: holding that foreign corporation was not doing business in illinois and thus personal jurisdiction was lacking even though corporation had some contact with the state and maintained a registered agent here because tjhere is nothing in the illinois code of civil procedure that supports asserting in personam jurisdiction over a corporate defendant simply because the plaintiff served summons upon the defendants illinois registered agent
B.