With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". standing, a party must have suffered an injury-in-fact, that injury must have been caused by the defendant, and the injury must be redressable by a favorable ruling. Phillips v. DeWine, 841 F.3d 405, 414 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992)). A sale of the residence (and the eviction that Jahn sought) would constitute such an injury, caused by Jahn’s actions, and is re-dressable by a favorable ruling on the motion to compel abandonment. The eases that Jahn cites in support of his argument to the contrary concern other matters entirely, such as the lack of a debtor’s standing to assert a cause of action that was clearly the property of the estate. See, e.g., In re Jones, 396 B.R. 638, 646-48 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2008) (<HOLDING>). Nor does the debtor have standing to make a

A: holding that the internal revenue service could be required to turn over to bankrupt estate tangible property to which debtor retained ownership
B: holding that the debtor lacked standing to bring a claim against the internal revenue service for the improper assessment of a tax deficiency because the cause of action was the property of the estate and had not been abandoned to the debtor
C: holding that a prefiling notification letter from the internal revenue service was not a notice of deficiency and therefore the tax court had no jurisdiction over the taxpayers petition
D: holding that cause of action for malpractice did not arise until the tax deficiency was assessed because prior to assessment the plaintiff had not been injured
B.