With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of unlawful discrimination with the MCAD with in six months of the discriminatory action. See Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B, §§ 5-9; Desando v. Lucent Technologies, 193 F.Supp.2d 358 (D.Mass.2002). The purpose of this statutory filing requirement is two-fold: to provide the employer with prompt notice of the claim and to create an opportunity for the agency to conciliate the claim. See Fant v. New England Power Serv. Co., 239 F.3d 8, 11 (1st Cir.2001). However, a plaintiffs civil complaint need not be an exact replica of her administrative charge to meet the Chapter 151B filing requirement. See Powers v. Grinnell Corp., 915 F.2d 34, 38 (1st Cir.1990) (“An administrative charge is not a blueprint for the litigation to follow.”); Lattimore v. Polaroid Corp., 99 F.3d 456, 464 (1st Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Instead, a claim that was not raised in an

A: holding that rule 12b1 insubstantiality dismissal is appropriate if based on the judges disbelief of a complaints factual allegations whereas a rule 12b6 dismissal is appropriate where while operating under the assumption that all or a set of facts in the complaint are true without regard to whether it is based on an outlandish legal theory or on a close but ultimately unavailing one it is clear that no relief could be granted under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations
B: holding that an employee is not required to comprehensively set forth with literary exactitude all of the facts and theories upon which his or her claim is based
C: holding that a plaintiff is not required to state the statutory or constitutional basis for his claim only the facts underlying it
D: holding that use of phrase shady practitioner to describe lawyer was nonactionable opinion where the article set forth the facts upon which the opinion was based
B.