With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". moved before trial to dismiss the actions, citing the'forum-selection clause printed on each passenger ticket. This clause purported to obligate the passenger to institute any suit arising in connection with the contract in Naples, Italy, and to renounce the right to sue elsewhere. The District Court denied petitioner’s motions to dismiss, holding that the ticket as a whole did not give reasonable notice to passengers that they were waiving the opportunity to sue in a domestic forum. Without v. S. N. C. Achille Lauro ed Altri-Gestione, 858 F. 2d 905, 908 (CA3 1988), cert. dism’d, 490 U. S. 1001 (1989); Sterling Forest Associates, Ltd. v. Barnett-Range Corp., 840 F. 2d 249, 253 (CA4 1988); Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Frazier-Parrott Commodities, Inc., 806 F. 2d 848, 851 (CA8 1986) (<HOLDING>). We now affirm. II Title 28 U. S. C. § 1291

A: holding such denial to be an immediately appealable collateral final order
B: holding that the issue of whether the attorney general was entitled to qualified immunity is immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine
C: holding that there can be only one final appealable order
D: holding that the denial of a motion to remand is interlocutory and not immediately appealable
A.