With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ORDER Shawn Oneal Williams, a native and citizen of Jamaica, seeks review of a March 30, 2012, decision of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. See In re Shawn Oneal Williams, No. A074 840 789 (B.I.A. Mar. 30, 2012). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and pro ssing whether Williams’s second immigration attorney was ineffective, while Williams’s claim was that his first immigration attorney was ineffective. Nonetheless, we decline to remand as remand would be futile. See Alam v. Gonzales, 438 F.3d 184, 187 (2d Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). The BIA’s finding that Williams failed to

A: holding that remand is unnecessary when it is clear that the same decision would have been reached in the absence of the errors
B: recognizing that party is not permitted to use the accident of a remand to raise an issue that it could just as well have raised in the first appeal internal quotation marks and alterations omitted
C: holding that apprendi error is harmless if the court finds beyond a reasonable doubt that the result would have been the same absent the error internal quotation marks and citation omitted
D: holding that remand is not required where there is no realistic possibility that absent the errors the ij or bia would have reached a different conclusion internal quotation marks omitted
D.