With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". on a defendant can only lead him to believe that the law contrives against him.” Id. at 834, 95 S.Ct. 2525 (emphasis added). Faretta does not address whether a trial court can offer a procedural benefit to a defendant that necessarily requires the defendant to waive his or her Sixth Amendment right to self-representation. Pasha correctly notes that the trial court’s offer of counsel on November 19, 2012, simultaneously included a procedural benefit: permitting Hernandez to refile and relitigate Pasha’s previously denied motions. However, contrary to Pasha’s assertion, the trial court’s offer did not violate his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation because the trial court did not force Pasha against his will to accept Hernandez as counsel. See id. at 807, 835-36, 95 S.Ct. 2525 (<HOLDING>). Rather, the record reflects that the trial

A: holding that one must voluntarily and intelligently waive the right to counsel
B: recognizing that when a defendant voluntarily intelligently and unequivocally elects to proceed without counsel under the sixth amendment a court cannot force the defendant to accept counsel against his or her will
C: holding that a defendant in a state criminal trial has an independent constitutional right of selfrepresentation and that he may proceed to represent himself without counsel when he voluntarily and intelligently elects to do so
D: holding that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to proceed without counsel when he voluntarily and intelligently elects to do so
B.