With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court to give the jurors an additional half-hour to deliberate before being recessed for the night. See, United States v. Taylor, 530 F.2d 49, 50-52 (5th Cir.1976). The error was that the trial court gave an impression during the next morning deliberations that the jurors might have to deliberate for over 13 hours that day. The judge was also late in excusing the jurors for lunch and failed to recess the jury in time for some of its members to begin service on another jury panel. It was this combination of time restraints along with an improper Allen charge and emphasis on the time and effort that had gone into the trial that warranted reversal. See also, People v. Steidl, 142 Ill.2d 204, 154 Ill.Dec. 616, 568 N.E.2d 837 (1991) cert. denied, 502 U.S. 853, 112 S.Ct. 161, 116 L.Ed.2d 125 (<HOLDING>); Ziegler v. State, 65 Wis.2d 703, 223 N.W.2d

A: holding that jury returning verdict 45 minutes after informed would be sequestered in hotel was not coerced into verdict
B: holding that upon objection to the form of the verdict trial court did not err in returning jury for further deliberations
C: holding that the verdict must be sustained if there is any competent evidence to support the verdict
D: holding that district court could not decide after jury returned verdict to treat jury verdict as advisory on issue not triable of right by jury but which was tried by consent of parties to nonadvisory jury
A.