With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". recoverable under CERCLA. Plaintiffs respond that the use of the employees of the City and the PRHA rather than consultants does not render the costs of such work unrecoverable. Plaintiffs cite T & E Indus., Inc. v. Safety Light Corp., 680 F.Supp. 696 (D.N.J.1988), in support of their position that the time spent by the employees of the City and PRHA are recoverable because the activities performed by these employees were required by the NCP. In T & E Indus., the district court found that the plaintiff could recover for the time spent by its president if it could adduce sufficient facts to demonstrate that he was personally involved in monitoring, evaluating, and minimizing the contamination. 680 F.Supp. at 707. Cf. Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co., 849 F.Supp. 931, 971-72 (D.N.J.1994) (<HOLDING>). In so holding, the court rejected the

A: holding that fees associated with obtaining and confirming the arbitration award are not recoverable
B: holding that attorneys fees and court costs are recoverable under general hold harmless indemnity agreement
C: holding that salaries of management and personnel are recoverable as indirect costs associated with general operation of response action
D: holding that investigatory costs are considered costs of response under cercla
C.