With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the decision of the court of appeals. 1 . At the hearing, the parties discussed the fact that the 81-month term had been fixed by the parties on the mistaken assumption that Garcia's criminal history score was six. It was noted that his score was actually five. However, Garcia agreed to an upward departure from the sentencing guidelines to maintain the agreed upon 81-month plea term. 2 . State v. Garcia, No. C0-95-2612, 1996 WL 291573 (Minn.App., filed June 4, 1996). 3 . Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 5. 4 . State v. Garcia, No. C4-97-1337, 1997 WL 644964 (Minn.App. Oct. 21, 1997) (slip op. at 3). 5 . Id. 6 . 581 N.W.2d 317 (Minn.1998). 7 . United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 134, 101 S.Ct. 426, 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980). 8 . See, e.g., State v. Mavis, 409 N.W.2d 853, 854 (Minn.1987) (<HOLDING>); State v. Givens, 544 N.W.2d 774, 111

A: holding federal court is not bound by terms of plea agreement between defendant and state authorities
B: holding that defendant was bound by plea bargain to reimburse state for extradition costs despite the fact that the state would not otherwise have authority to require reimbursement
C: holding that the state is bound to carry out its side of the bargain once the court accepts a plea agreement
D: holding that federal courts are bound by state interpretations of state law
B.