With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". relationships, such as the attorney-client relationship, always involve a fiduciary duty. Thigpen v. Locke, 363 S.W.2d 247, 253 (Tex.1962); M. Thomas Arnold, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, ACCOUNTANTS’ Liability 1994, 506 PLI/Lit 341, 347. In contrast, the accountant-client relationship does not always involve a fiduciary duty. Squyres v. Christian, 253 S.W.2d 470, 471 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth 1952, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“Appellees have cited no case, and we have found none, to the effect that ... the mere handling of a general accounting business establishes such a fiduciary relationship between an accountant and one of his clients as would toll the statute of limitation;.... ”); Arnold, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, at 348-49. For example, an audit W.2d 415, 423 (Tex.App.-Austin 1995, no writ) (<HOLDING>); Diesel Fuel Injection Serv., Inc. v.

A: holding that negligence in the performance of engineering services is inherently undiscoverable
B: holding that economic loss doctrine bars negligence claims as to engineering services related to roof repair and reconstruction
C: holding that the basis of liability is negligence and not injury
D: holding that ordinary negligence and gross negligence are not separate causes of action
A.