With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". receive like treatment in a court of law. This Court may not disregard Industrial Indemnity absent an intervening U.S. Supreme Court or en banc Eleventh Circuit Decision to the contrary. Flowers v. United States, 764 F.2d 759, 761 (11th Cir.1985). Moreover, numerous state and federal courts in other jurisdictions agree with Judge Hodges’ reasoning. See A. Johnson & Co., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 741 F.Supp. 298 (D.Mass.1990) (the Massachusetts Court applying Maine law held that the pollution exclusion was unambiguous and excluded coverage for pollution over an extended period of time); see also Lumberman’s Mutual Cas. Co. v. Belleville Indus., Inc., 407 Mass. 675, 555 N.E.2d 568, 572 (1990); Bentz v. Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Ins. Co., 83 Md.App. 524, 575 A.2d 795 (1990) (<HOLDING>); Grant Southern Iron & Metal Co. v. CNA Ins.

A: holding that there is nothing intrinsically unclear about the terms sudden and accidental
B: holding that there is nothing arbitrary or capricious about the requirement
C: recognizing that courts will not add terms to a contract about which the contract is silent
D: holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if there is a genuine dispute about a material fact
A.