With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 831, 838 (Alaska 2015) (quoting Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric Inst., 208 P.3d 168, 187 (Alaska 2009)). 15 . Cowan, 255 P.3d at 974. 16 . Penn v. Ivey, 615 P.2d 1, 4 n.4 (Alaska 1980) (quoting Albert v. Declue, 526 S.W.2d 39, 40 (Mo.App.1975)) (first citing Knapp v. Wise, 122 Ariz. 327, 594 P.2d 1023 (App.1979); then citing Gospel Echos Chapel Inc. v. Wadsworth, 19 Ariz.App. 382, 507 P.2d 994 (1973); then citing Cole v. Burleson, 375 So.2d 1046 (Miss.1979); and then citing Swecker v. Dorn, 181 Mont. 436, 593 P.2d 1055 (1979)). 17 . Peters v. Juneau-Douglas Girl Scout Council, 519 P.2d 826, 830 (Alaska 1974). 18 . See Penn, 615 P.2d at 4. 19 . Vezey v. Green, 35 P.3d 14, 22 (Alaska 2001) (quoting Nome 2000 v. Fagerstrom, 799 P.2d 304, 309 (Alaska 1990)) (citing Peters, 519 P.2d at 831) (<HOLDING>); see also Nome 2000, .799 P.2d at 310 (holding

A: holding that use of traffic signal equipment was inconsistent with sellers ownership and constituted acceptance
B: holding that allowing moderate use of the resources on the property was not inconsistent with exclusive use
C: recognizing that a temporary use of property does not automatically create an expectation of privacy in that property
D: holding evidence which established that use of property was permissive showed use of property was not adverse
B.