With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". The issues we are asked to consider are whether Mr. Warlick had a fiduciary duty owed to the other stockholders and whether he breached this duty, and, whether Mr. War-lick has a basis to claim appellants are equitably estopped from attacking his premium received for his stock. South Carolina has long followed the general rule that corporate stock is personal property which the owner may “dispose of ... as he sees fit.” Alderman v. Alderman, 178 S. C. 9, 43, 181 S. E. 897, 911 (1935); accord,, e.g., McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp., 265 S. C. 1, 7, 216 S. E. (2d) 746, 748 (1975). Concomitantly, when selling stock, stockholders must “necessarily act for themselves, and not as trustees for other stockholders.” Swinney v. Keebler Co., 480 F. (2d) 573, 577 (4th Cir. 1973) (citation omitted) (<HOLDING>). This general rule applies as well to majority

A: recognizing south carolina as a jurisdiction where service on statutory agent is exclusive
B: holding jury charge is proper if as a whole it is free from error and reflects the current and correct law of south carolina
C: holding that under south carolina law slander is actionable per se where plaintiff is alleged to have committed adultery
D: recognizing south carolina as the governing law and finding no south carolina cases directly on point the court referred to applicable law from other jurisdictions
D.