With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Fay Chamberlain, a grocery store customer, sustained when she slipped on an icy sidewalk outside the store. The grocer leases the store building, but not the sidewalk. We reverse summary judgment entered in favor of the shopping center owner. The customer sued the owner and Food Lion, LLC (Food Lion), the grocer. Food Lion filed a cross-claim against the shopping center owner for indemnification and contribution, a cross-claim it later dismissed. Judgment was entered thereafter against the plaintiff on the owner’s motion for summary judgment, which the customer did not oppose or appeal. Here, as below, however, Food Lion argues that entering summary judgment in favor of the owner and against the customer was error. See Holton v. H.J. Wilson Co., Inc., 482 So.2d 341, 342 (Fla.1986) (<HOLDING>). The mere right to appeal does not obviate the

A: recognizing that judgments of arizona courts on foreign judgments will not be conclusive in the jurisdiction of origin
B: holding that courts review judgments not statements in opinions
C: recognizing a civil defendants right to appeal alleged errors in judgments exonerating codefendants
D: recognizing preclusive effect of judgments notwithstanding pending appeal or collateral attack
C.