With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". costs because it used the contract’s incorrect prevailing wage schedules, which the City’s bid documents designated, in calculating its bid for the project and determining its lump sum contract price for the project. According to SES, the City’s breach — i.e., specifying the incorrect rate in the bid documents — caused these damages. SES offered evidence that its representatives relied on the incorrect rate in formulating SES’s bid on the project. It also offered damage models showing the difference between its actual costs and the costs it would have incurred had the rate been capped by the allegedly correct ot make the City a guarantor that an employer hires employees at that rate. See United States v. Binghamton Constr. Co., 347 U.S. 171, 178, 74 S.Ct. 438, 442, 98 L.Ed. 594 (1954) (<HOLDING>). According to section 1.2.2 of the contract,

A: holding that with respect to the eaja the local or national market rate for legal services cannot be a special factor used to increase the rate beyond the statutory rate
B: holding that the proper rate for prejudgment interest is the rate fixed by the parties in a contract
C: holding that federal prevailing wage rate statutes requirement that contractor pay not less specified minima presupposes possibility that successful bidder may have to pay higher rate to workers and that bidders reliance on governments representation of prevailing rate in computing its bid cannot be said to have been justified
D: holding that the purpose of predecessor texas wage rate statute was to ensure that workers on public projects receive not less than prevailing rate
C.