With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". from an illegal sentence is a fundamental right. Luckett v. State, 582 So.2d 428, 430 (Miss.1991). We review Edwards’ claims because, as a general rule, the time bar does not preclude review of a motion seeking relief from an illegal sentence. Ivy v. State, 731 So.2d 601, 603 (¶ 13) (Miss.1999). Edwards correctly argues that the partially suspended sentence was illegal. This Court has consistently held that Mississippi Code Annotated § 47-7-33 prevents a trial court from wholly or partially suspending the sentence of a defendant convicted of a felony on a previous occasion. See Cooper v. State, 737 So.2d 1042, 1045 (¶ 11) (Miss.Ct.App.1999) (citing Robinson v. State, 585 So.2d 757, 759 (Miss.1991)). See also Goss v. State, 721 So.2d 144 (¶ 12) (Miss.1998) (overruled on other grounds) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 5. The case sub judice parallels Chancellor

A: holding that dual convictions of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of ammunition by a convicted felon violated double jeopardy
B: holding unconstitutional a sentence of life imprisonment for passing a bad check by a convicted felon
C: holding that the trial court was not entitled to impose a threeyear mandatory minimum sentence on a defendant convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon where the jury verdict did not specifically find actual possession
D: holding that defendant was not entitled to partially suspended sentence as a previously convicted felon
D.