With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Choice policy” refers to an insurance policy issued by Medica to Randall. 2 . Although Patch and Syring were covered by separate PHP policies, the policy language at issue in this case was identical in each PHP policy. 3 . Allen v. United States, 668 F.Supp. 1242, 1247 (W.D.Wis.1987) (interpreting a federal statute that only allowed subrogation when there was tort liability); Arizona Property & Cas. Ins. Guar. Fund v. Herder, 156 Ariz. 203, 208-09, 751 P.2d 519, 524 (1988) (interpreting "persons or organizations who may be legally responsible” for bodily injuries in limit-of-liability clause involving "amounts otherwise payable for damages” to include only parties who were responsible for the infliction of the injuries); Employers Health, 161 Wis.2d at 945-47, 469 N.W.2d at 175-76 (<HOLDING>); Hamed v. County of Milwaukee, 108 Wis.2d 257,

A: holding that pecuniary damages are not property damages under insureds policy
B: holding no right to recover for economic loss resulting from defendants injury to a third party with whom plaintiff has contractual business relationship
C: recognizing that compensation from a collateral source indepen dent of the wrongdoer will not reduce the damages recoverable from the wrongdoer
D: holding that a clause providing that the insurer has a right to recover damages from a responsible third party referred to a tortfeasor because the use of damages in bodily injury cases means pecuniary compensation resulting from an unlawful or negligent act by a wrongdoer
D.