With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". like-situated, reasonable government agent that what defendant is doing violates federal law in the circumstances.’ ” Id. (quoting Lassiter v. Ala. A & M Univ. Bd. of Trs., 28 F.3d 1146, 1150 (11th Cir.1994) (en banc)). Given the absence of a statement that an attached garage is part of the home and the scant recitation of the facts and analysis in Sokolow, it cannot be said that Sokolow made it "sufficiently clear” to every reasonable official that entering any attached garage to conduct a search or make an arrest without a warrant or applicable exception violates the Fourth Amendment. See Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 640, 107 S.Ct. 3034, 3039, 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987). 13 . The district court held that the law at the time of the Deputies’ ent Ct. 2406, 49 L.Ed.2d 300 (1976) (<HOLDING>). In McClish, we held that "[t]he Fourth

A: holding that santana who had been standing in the doorway to her home could not retreat into her house to thwart an otherwise proper arrest citing hot pursuit
B: holding that contempt finding was proper where the former wife attempted to directly thwart the divorce judgment and cloud the title to certain marital property by transferring her interest by deed to her sister
C: holding that debtor who was separated from her husband and who testified that she would only return to the marital home if her husband vacated the house or died or if she was required to care for him or her adult son there or if the couple reconciled was an abandonment of the marital home as her homestead
D: holding that hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect justified a warrantless entry into the suspects home to protect inhabitants as long as the police did not know the home belonged to the suspect
A.