With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". within the scope of the agreement, and negligence was specifically described within that scope. Id. 17 . Some of the provisions of the CBAs that Defendant cites to involve procedures that the employer will follow if an employee complains of a ‘‘potential” workplace safety concern. Importantly, Plaintiffs’ negligence claim is not based on Defendant’s failure to follow a procedure established by a CBA. See Arceneaux v. Amstar Coip., No. 03-3588, 2004 WL 574718, at *4 (E.D.La. Mar. 22, 2004) ("Plaintiffs do not allege that defendants violated the applicable health and safety provisions of the CBA. To determine whether defendants violated their duty to plaintiffs, a court need look only as far as [Louisiana state law].”); see also McKnight v. Dresser, Inc., 676 F.3d 426, 434 (5th Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>). 18 . For instance, coworkers testifying that

A: holding that  302 of the lmra is not preempted by nlrbs exclusive jurisdiction to hear  7 or  8 nlra cases
B: holding that question of whether a state law tort claim was preempted by the lmra focused on whether evaluation of the tort claim is inextricably intertwined with consideration of the terms of the labor contract
C: holding misrepresentation claim to be preempted
D: holding employees negligence claim not preempted by lmra
D.