With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM: Bruce Martin Davis appeals his jury convictions and resulting 174-month sentence for attempted aggravated bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (2000) (“Count One”), and using and brandishing a firearm during the commission of a violent felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (2000) (“Count Two”), for an incident that occurred in November 2002, and for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2000) (“Count Three”), for an incident that occurred in April 2003. Davis c ces surrounding the prior bad acts and the crimes with which Davis was charged, we conclude the district court’s admission of Davis’s prior bad acts into evidence was not arbitrary or irrational. See id. at 996 (<HOLDING>). We also reject Davis’s claim that the

A: holding that the more similar the prior bad act is to the charged crime the more relevant the prior bad act becomes toward proving intent
B: holding admission of prior bad acts of child abuse was reversible error when the defendant did not have exclusive control over the children during the period when the prior bad acts occurred
C: holding that evidence of prior similar act was not relevant for the purpose of proving doctors negligence in performing operation at issue on particular occasion
D: holding on a criminal appeal that prior bad acts evidence is admissible to prove intent to commit the charged crime
A.