With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Named Agents of Fed. Narcotics Bureau, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). 20 . Id. at 396-99, 91 S.Ct. at 2004-06. 21 . 103 S.Ct. at 2411-12. 22 . Id. at 2416-17. 23 . Stephens v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human Serv., 901 F.2d 1571 (11th Cir.), cert denied, -U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 555, 112 L.Ed.2d 562 (1990); Feit v. Ward, 886 F.2d 848, 854-56 (7th Cir.1989); Hill v. Department of Air Force, 884 F.2d 1318, 1320-21 (10th Cir.1989); Kotarski v. Cooper, 866 F.2d 311 (9th Cir.1989); McIntosh v. Turner, 861 F.2d 524 (8th Cir.1988); Spagnola v. Mathis, 859 F.2d 223, 228 (D.C.Cir.1988); Braun v. United States, 707 F.2d 922, 926 (6th Cir.1983). 24 . Cf. Palmero v. Rorex, 806 F.2d 1266, 1270-71 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 819, 108 S.Ct. 77, 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987) (<HOLDING>). See generally Gleason v. Malcom, 718 F.2d

A: holding that due to the csra a federal employee has no independent right of action for damages against a supervisor who improperly disciplined the employee for exercising his first amendment rights
B: holding that federal employee cannot file for damages against supervisor for an unconstitutional adverse personnel action when congress has provided adequate administrative remedy
C: holding that a federal employee cannot bring a civil action placing only the allegedly insufficient administrative remedy at issuethe employee must also place the finding of discrimination at issue
D: recognizing that the cmpa provides the exclusive remedy for a common law action  if the employee claims wrongful treatment or injury cognizable as a personnel issue under the acts performance ratings adverse actions and employee grievance provisions
B.