With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". VTI.’ ” Thomas v. Denny’s Inc., 111 F.3d 1606, 1513 (10th Cir.1997) (citation omitted). Second, as the jury was properly instructed, “Sprint is a corporation .... [and] may act only through natural persons as its agents or employees.” I R. at 198. The Eleventh Circuit has noted: Undoubtedly, a verdict exonerating an agent while holding his principal liable for his actions would be an inconsistent resolution of factual questions.... We have no doubt that a judgment holding a principal liable in a Title VII [disparate impact case] would be inconsistent with a verdict exonerating under § 1981 the employees from whose actions Title VII liability derives. Lincoln v. Board of Regents, 697 F.2d 928, 934-35 (11th Cir.1983). See also Hinton v. City of Elwood, 997 F.2d 774, 782 (10th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); de Feliciano v. de Jesus, 873 F.2d 447, 450

A: holding that a section 1983 failuretotrain claim cannot be maintained against a governmental employer in a case where there is no underlying constitutional violation by the employee
B: holding that where no underlying constitutional violation occurred the city cannot be liable under monell
C: holding that a city may not be held liable under  1983 where there was no underlying constitutional violation by any of its officers
D: holding that city may properly be held liable where policy is moving force behind constitutional violation
C.