With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". foreclosure complaint in its own name on behalf of owner and holder of note and servi-cer that merely verifies’ complaint filed in name of owner and holder of note); Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. v. Huber, 137 So.3d 562, 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (finding error with trial court’s* determination that appellant’s servicing agent lacked standing to bring foreclosure action on appellant’s behalf when record “clearly reflected]” that appellant filed foreclosure complaint on its own behalf and that servicing agent merely verified complaint); see also US Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Marion, 122 So.3d 398, 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (reversing dismissal on basis that servi-cer’s employee verified bank’s foreclosure complaint); Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. v. Prevratil, 120 So.3d 573, 576 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, noteholder-plaintiffs routinely

A: holding that rule 45b does not require personal service
B: holding that florida rule of civil procedure 1110 does not require that verification be based on personal knowledge
C: holding that an ineffective grievance procedure bars employers defense based on that procedure
D: holding a trial court commits fundamental error by failing to follow florida rule of juvenile procedure 8150 the juvenile rule equivalent of florida rule of criminal procedure 3830
B.