With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". annulling the judgment.' ” Shockey v. Curtis, 971 S.W.2d 320, 323 (Mo.App. S.D.1998) (quoting In re Marriage of Caby, 825 S.W.2d 56, 59 (Mo.App.S.D.1992)). 5 . Mother argues that the second element was established through evidence presented at trial that Father had intentionally transferred most of his assets to his live-in girlfriend of ten years, chosen not to work for pay, and had engaged in other conduct to avoid paying this and other judgments. Mother argues that the trial court's finding that there was substantial evidence that "[Father] had divested himself of assets, had substantial employment income and simply engaged in conduct to avoid payment of the Judgment” should be sufficient to support Father’s commitment. 6 . See Walton v. Walton, 789 S.W.2d 64, 68 (Mo.App. W.D.1990)

A: holding that father being held in jail based on presumption of ability to comply could not have been incarcerated for civil contempt of child support order after failing to appear at contempt hearing without affirmative finding based on evidence that he had present ability to pay purge amount
B: holding that a husband cannot be required to pay a support award that exceeds his financial ability
C: holding the trial court made sufficient findings where it found in summary that father was physically able to make the required payments by virtue of his ability to work and earn income that he had the present financial ability to work and earn income that he had the present financial ability to satisfy his arrearage or to obtain the means by which said arrearage could be satisfied and that father failed to present adequate facts to excuse his noncompliance and inability to comply
D: holding that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion by stating that it did not have the ability to present the transcript to the jury
C.