With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". jurisdiction to entertain any appeal from the order compelling arbitration. Celltex first contends we lack jurisdiction because K-Stemcell’s and Biostar’s notices of appeal state they are taken from the trial court’s order signed February 12, 2015, not the September 22, 2014, order compelling arbitration. Rule 25.1 provides that a notice of appeal must state the date of the judgment or order appealed from. Tex. R. App. P 25.1(d)(2). However, the rules do not require an appellant to list in the notice of appeal every interlocutory ruling that he desires to challenge on appeal. See Ostrovitz & Gwinn, LLC v. First Specialty Ins. Co., 393 S.W.3d 379, 386 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2012, no pet.) (citing Gunnerman v. Basic Capital Mgmt., Inc., 106 S.W.3d 821, 824 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2003, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>)); Vazquez v. Vazquez, 292 S.W.3d 80, 82-83

A: holding that notice of appeal from final judgment brought forward the entire case including earlier interlocutory orders that were not independently appealable
B: holding that orders remanding an action to a federal agency are generally not considered final appealable orders
C: holding same as to the filing of a notice of an interlocutory appeal
D: holding that a notice of appeal that referred only to the final judgment was sufficient to support review of earlier orders including an order involved in an unsuccessful attempt to take a premature appeal
A.