With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1 . Even if such a showing could be made out for Plaintiff, it does not mean that preliminary in-junctive relief on behalf of the entire class would be appropriate here. An individual showing of poverty would have to be made by each class member requesting such relief. 2 . Pursuant to Rule 10.7 of the Sixteenth Edition of The Bluebook (1996), the Court shall omit from its citations denials of certiorari “unless the decision is less than two years old or the denial is particularly relevant.” 3 . While not a constitutional claim, the Seventh Circuit has reached the same conclusion in an ADEA case. See EEOC v. City of Janesville, 630 F.2d 1254, 1259 (7th Cir.1980). 4 . But see ACS Enterprises, Inc. v. Comcast Cablevision of Philadelphia, L.P., 857 F.Supp. 1105, 1111-12 (E.D.Pa.1994) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 60 F.3d 813 (3d Cir.1995) (unpublished

A: holding that potential loss of a contract constitutes irreparable injury
B: holding that a taking traditionally results in monetary compensation thus negating any claim of irreparable injury
C: holding that monetary damages do not generally constitute irreparable harm
D: holding that evidence of specific competitive injury establishes irreparable injury warranting injunctive relief
B.