With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Dec. 533 (rejecting implied private action for rate violations under the Illinois Insurance Code; Peel v. Yellow Cab Co., Inc. (1st Dist. 1986), 147 Ill. App. 3d 992, 498 N.E.2d 788, 101 Ill. Dec. 464 (rejecting implied private action under the City Consumer Services Ordinance); Anzinger v. Illinois State Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange (1st Dist. 1986), 144 Ill. App. 3d 719, 494 N.E.2d 655, 98 111. Dec. 533 (rejecting implied private action for reparation under the Insurance Code); Cook v. Optimum/Ideal Managers, Inc. (2d Dist. 1984), 130 Ill. App. 3d 180, 473 N.E.2d 334, 84 Ill. Dec. 932 (rejecting implied private actions for retaliatory termination of payments and for withholding of medical reports under Workers’ Compensation 115 Ill. App. 3d 481, 450 N.E.2d 811, 71 Ill. Dec. 123 (<HOLDING>); Lehmann v. Arnold (4th Dist. 1985), 137 Ill.

A: recognizing implied private retaliatory discharge action under the guardianship and advocacy act
B: recognizing implied private action under the collection agency act
C: recognizing retaliatory discharge tort implied by the workers compensation act
D: recognizing the tort of retaliatory discharge
A.