With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and specifically the suppliers of transportation services. GET also argues that tour operators are also not dence of a warranty did not appear in the brochure for Ramage’s 1995 tour; it appeared only in the 1996 brochure. GET contends that as a matter of law the “Responsibility” disclaimer explicitly states that it was not guaranteeing the safety of tour participants while they were in the hands of third-party tour operators. Fourth, GET argues that as a matter of law it was not negligent in selecting a ground operator for the tour. The scope of the duty of tour operators in selecting independent operators is broad and only compels a general inquiry by the tour operator into the safety of the independent operator. Wilson v. American Trans Air, Inc., 874 F.2d 386 (7th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). In the instant ease, GET had no reason to

A: holding that a tour operator had no duty to make specific inquiries into guest safety or security at the hotel where it already completed a general inspection and relied on the hotels good reputation
B: recognizing duty of innkeeper to guest
C: holding that a hotel security guard was not liable under  1983 merely because he called police and brought the police to the plaintiffs hotel room
D: holding that search of hotel room without a search warrant and without consent of absent guest was unlawful even though hotel clerk had consented to search
A.