With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". with UTSW has suffered. Indeed, she informs that she still holds her position as a professor of pathology at UTSW, and fails to allege that she has experienced a reduction in salary due to her removal from her Parkland appointments. As the Fifth Circuit has recognized on more than one occasion, physicians employed by the state hold a property interest in the economic benefits of their employment, but not to non-economic benefits such as a title, laboratory space, or clinical access privileges. See Schoppa Family, 2002 WL 31730375, at *5 (“Finally, the loss of her title, supply budget, laboratory space, and support for a technician did not reduce [plaintiffs] income. Because [plaintiff] had no cognizable property interest ... she has no due process claim”); Daly, 675 F.2d at 726-27 (<HOLDING>). For these reasons, the Court finds that Dr.

A: holding that the prison physician lacked standing to raise the prisoners rights of access to the courts
B: holding a physician plaintiff did not have a property interest in his clinical access privileges
C: recognizing common law privileges
D: holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
B.