With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Cir.1997) (upholding a § 3A1.2(a) sentence enhancement of defendant who was convicted of plotting to blow up an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) building because, although no one was killed and the defendant did not know the names of his intended victims, the defendant did intend to “kill, injure, or maim federal employees in the [building] solely because those person worked for the IRS.”); United States v. Harris, 104 F.3d 1465, 1476 (5th Cir.1997) (reversing a defendant’s enhancement under § 3A1.2(a) because while two of the defendant’s co-conspirators had shot a police officer while fleeing, the defendant’s offense of conviction, accessory after the fact, “was not motivated by the government employee status” of the officer.); United States v. Hooker, 997 F.2d 67, 75-76 (5th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). We have previously never considered an

A: holding that statements made only to supervisor and chief by police officer were matters of public concern
B: holding that there was no double counting in applying  3c12 and  3a12b because they were based on separate acts
C: holding defendants were properly joined because they are alleged to have participated in the underlying conspiracy
D: holding that the defendants sentences were properly enhanced under  3a12b because they assaulted an officer employed by the mississippi bureau of narcotics and during the assault made statements including they are the police lets kill them
D.