With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or negligence of independent suppliers of services to the tour Ramage purchased from GET, including providers of transportation services. GET argues because the law is clear that such disclaimers are fully enforceable and that tour operators are not liable for the alleged negligence of independent suppliers of services to tours, GET should be dismissed from the action brought by Ramage. First, GET contends that the terms and conditions of the contract governing the tour, specifically the disclaimer therein, bar Ramage’s claim against defendant. Generally, contractual disclaimers and limitations of liability are binding even though they appear on pre-printed tickets and brochures. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 593, 111 S.Ct. 1522, 1527, 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991) (<HOLDING>). More specifically, tour operators’

A: holding that a standard form disclaimer for negligence of thirdparty tour operators which appeared on plaintiffs cruise ticket was valid as a disclaimer
B: holding that the language in the lease agreement for computer accounting programs was an effective disclaimer of an implied warranty but for language in a statement of installation conditions which document created a genuine issue of material fact as to disclaimer
C: holding that a standard form forumselection clause which appeared on plaintiffs passenger ticket was valid as a disclaimer
D: holding inconspicuous written disclaimer to be unenforceable absent actual knowledge of the disclaimer
C.