With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". served by “delivering” a copy to the person named therein. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b)(1). In this case, a process server went to a house that Mrs. Terry’s company owns and that the Terrys use as a vacation home, and handed the subpoena to Mr, Terry. Mrs. Terry argues that did not constitute delivery because Rule 45 WL 2038799, at *2-3 (Bankr. S. D. Fla. May 8, 2008) (rejecting “as antiquated the so-called majority position interpreting Rule 45 as requiring personal service,” and instead adopting “the better-reasoned, modern, emerging minority position, which holds that substitute service of a subpoena is effective on a nonparty witness under Rule 45” and finding permissible a subpoena served on a party’s wife at a residence owned by him); Hall v. Sullivan, 229 F.R.D. 501, 505 (D. Md. 2005) (<HOLDING>). ' Mrs, Terry next asserts CresCom’s lawyers

A: holding the rule 4 requirement of delivery to the appropriate united states attorney required personal service not service by certified mail
B: holding that personal jurisdiction is not conferred if service under rule 4 is not properly effected
C: holding that rule 45b does not require personal service
D: holding that delivery of subpoena via federal express was sufficient because effective service under rule 45 is not limited to personal service
C.