With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". placed and allowed R.A. to remain with Akin, who engaged in conduct that endangered R.A.’s physical or emotional well-being, and (b) Jordan herself engaged in conduct that endangered R.A.’s physical or emotional well-being. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(1)(E). a. Placing and Allowing RA. to Remain with Akin For the same reasons detailed in our analysis of section D, we conclude the evidence supports the trial court’s determination that Jordan’s voluntary and knowing placement of R.A. with Akin and her voluntary and knowing decision to allow R.A. to remain with Akin by opting not to use earnest efforts until after September 2007 to regain custody of R.A., endangered the physical and emotional well-being of R.A. See In re S.P., 168 S.W.3d 197, 204-05 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2005, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); In re J.M.M., 80 S.W.3d at 241-42; Hann, 969

A: holding evidence supported terminating mothers parental rights under section d based in part on evidence that mother could not adequately protect or provide financially for children
B: holding evidence insufficient to terminate mothers parental rights under section c because mother made arrangements for adequate support of children evidence showed mother left children with father who maintained steady employment and adequately supported children mother knew that father would provide adequate support and mother left children pursuant to agreed divorce decree
C: holding evidence legally and factually sufficient under sections d and e to terminate mothers parental rights based in part on evidence that mother placed children with father who lived transient lifestyle with children
D: holding evidence supported termination of mothers parental rights where among other factors mother knowingly allowed abusive and sexually deviant father to have access to children
D.