With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". utility records reveal only the total amount of electricity a person is using in his home on a periodic basis and the amount being paid for those services. It does not divulge personal details — whether or when the person is watching television, talking on the telephone, or using any particular appliance. Thus, one could easily conclude that a person has a far greater expectation of privacy in his bank records than his utility records. Significantly, no state court has interpreted its own constitution to mandate that the police first obtain a warrant to obtain electric utility records. The state courts that have considered the issue have rejected the notion that there is a legitimate expectation of privacy in such records. See Samson v. State, 919 P.2d 171, 173 (Alaska Ct.App.1996) (<HOLDING>); People v. Stanley, 72 Cal.App.4th 1547, 86

A: holding that a bank customer did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in records maintained by the bank
B: holding that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in utility records under either state or federal constitution
C: holding that no reasonable expectation of privacy in utility records exists under alaska constitution
D: holding no reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records because of statutory exception to physicianpatient privilege in homicide trials
C.