With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". be given to the fact he did so, or that his parents and lawyers approved. 4 . At one point in his testimony, Hodges proudly proclaimed that during 1999 he had closed over 100 transactions for Defendant earning his employer over $600,000 in gross profit. 5 . Several of the lawyers who serve as officers for Defendant apparently graduated together from Rutgers Law School in New Jersey. 6 . Of course, if Wiggins was incapable of contracting with Defendant, which was likely the ultimate issue in any litigation, his agreement to litigate in New Jersey was also unenforceable. 7 . Defendant argued that Plaintiff should not be able to assert claims under the ICPA or for breach of fiduciary duty because those claims were not adequately pled in Plaintiff's complaint. See Supp.2d 319 (D.Vt.1999) (<HOLDING>); contra Rumbin v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 254

A: holding antiassignment clause in structured settlement is enforceable
B: holding that a forum selection clause was not enforceable against defendants that were not parties to the contract
C: holding hellorhighwater clause enforceable in the absence of fraud or deceit
D: holding that a court may only enforce a settlement agreement if it constitutes an enforceable contract
A.