With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". U.S. 555, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). An individual must satisfy a three-prong test in order to establish standing. See id. First, the individual must have suffered some injury in fact — an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized and actual or imminent. See id. at 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130; MD Pharmaceutical Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 133 F.3d 8, 11 (D.C.Cir.1998) (concluding that current manufacturer had standing to seek review of actions taken by the DEA). In some cases, a plaintiff may be injured when the “discriminatory classification preventfs] the plaintiff from competing on an equal footing.” Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors of America v. Jacksonville, 508 U.S. 656, 667, 113 S.Ct. 2297, 124 L.Ed.2d 586 (1993) (<HOLDING>). Second, the injury must be fairly traceable

A: holding that the claims to a statutory benefit had not yet vested when the legislature eliminated the benefit
B: holding that when the government erects a barrier in order to establish standing a group seeking to challenge the barrier need not allege they would have attained the benefit but for the barrier
C: holding that a debtor need not have received a benefit from the fraudulent activity in order for  523a2a to prevent a discharge
D: holding the government waived its argument on appeal that the defendant did not have standing to challenge a search when it failed to raise the argument to the district court
B.