With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the associational rights of defendants convicted of racketeering offenses. Section 3582(d) provides that a court, in imposing a sentence to a term of imprisonment upon a defendant convicted of a felony set forth in chapter 95 (racketeering) or 96, (racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations) of this title, . ■.. may include as a part of the sentence an order that requires that the defendant not associate or communicate with a specified person, other than his attorney, upon a showing of probable cause to believe that association or communication with such person is for the purpose of enabling the defendant to 'control, manage, direct, finance, or otherwise participate in an illegal enterprise. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(d) (1994); cf. United States v. Sotelo, 94 F.3d 1037, 1040 (7th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Here, Felipe was convietéd of participating

A: holding that while no federal statute authorizes a court to restrict the communications of an inmate convicted of mailing threatening communications 18 usc  3582d does authorize a district court to restrict the communications of an inmate convicted of racketeering offenses
B: holding district court must make explicit factual findings or record must contain evidence to support special condition to restrict travel outside united states
C: holding that the registration requirement in 17 usc  411a of the copyright act imposes a precondition to filing a claim and does not restrict a federal courts subjectmatter jurisdiction
D: holding that a statute imposing a one dollar court cost for law enforcement on every person convicted of a crime was not a violation of the separation of powers doctrine because it is reasonable that one convicted of a crime should be made to share in the improvement of agencies that society has had to employ in defense against the very acts for which he has been convicted
A.