With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Worth 1992, pet. ref'd); Petty v. State, 696 S.W.2d 635, 639 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1985, no pet.). 15 . See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1883, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). 16 . See d 376 (2006). 20 . United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 510-11 (5th Cir.2004); Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245; McQuarters v. State, 58 S.W.3d 250, 256 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). 21 . Terry, 392 U.S. at 21, 88 S.Ct. at 1880; Garcia v. State, 43 S.W.3d 527, 530 (Tex.Crim.App.2001); McQuarters, 58 S.W.3d at 255. 22 . Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124, 120 S.Ct. 673, 676, 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000). 23 . Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 242; Crockett v. State, 803 S.W.2d 308, 311 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). 24 . Garcia, 43 S.W.3d at 530; McQuarters, 58 S.W.3d at 255. 25 . See Mohmed, 977 S.W.2d at 628 (<HOLDING>); Smith, 840 S.W.2d at 692; Petty, 696 S.W.2d

A: holding that department of transportation did not have control over an uninsured motorists vehicle as intended by the personal property exception to sovereign immunity where it failed to physically obtain custody of motorists drivers license and allowed him to possess a license plate
B: holding that officers may question motorists about their license registration and travel plans
C: holding that reasonable suspicion existed based on defendants nervousness expired drivers license and suspicious story regarding travel plans
D: holding it was reasonable for a trooper to issue a written warning verify the defendant license and registration information and ask preliminary questions about travel plans because the trooper saw the defendants registration tag displayed in an unlawful manner even after he approached the vehicle
B.