With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Tusco for work per change orders: Clark’s receipt of payment from the Owner on account of pending changes made by the Owner shall be a condition precedent to Clark’s obligation to make payment for changed work to Subcontractor. Compl.,.Ex. B, Art. 9(c) (emphasis added). This type of conditional payment clause in a subcontract agreement is commonly referred to by courts as a “pay-if-paid” or “pay-when-paid” clause. See, e.g., Universal Concrete Products v. Turner Const. Co., 595 F.3d 527, 529-32 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting that a clause making payment by the Owner an “express condition precedent” to payment from the prime contractor to subcontractor is a “pay-when-paid” clause under Virginia law); MidAmerica Constr. Mgmt., Inc. v. MasTec N. Am., Inc., 436 F.3d 1257, 1261-64 (10th Cir. 2006) (<HOLDING>); see also Steven J. Koprince, The Slow Erosion

A: holding that a clause making payment by the owner an express condition precedent to payment by the general contractor to the subcontractor was enforceable
B: holding that subcontractor could recover damages from general contractor for delay in performance under state law
C: holding that a provision making all payments to subcontractor by  contractor expressly contingent upon payment for the work by contractor from owner is a payifpaid clause under texas law
D: holding that a surety after becoming aware of a single claim for labor and materials by a subcontractor acted reasonably by directing the owner to withhold further payments from the contractor even though contractor had not been declared in default by the owner
C.