With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of exchange •prevailing on the date of entry of the judgment or decree. N.Y.Jud.Law § 27(b) (McKinney 1987) (emphasis added). Before § 27(b) was enacted, New York courts applied the breach-day conversion rule, which entitled a plaintiff to recover an amount in dollars equal to the exchange rate between dollars and the foreign currency at the time of breach. See Competex, 783 F.2d at 334; Middle East Banking v. State Street Bank Int'l, 821 F.2d 897, 902-03 (1987); Indag, S.A. v. Irridelco Corp., 658 F.Supp. 763 (S.D.N.Y.1987). Section 27(b) now explicitly provides that a judgment entered in a foreign currency be converted into United States dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the date of judgment. See Agfa-Gevaert, A.G., v. A.B. Dick Company, 879 F.2d 1518, 1524 (7th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>); but see Elevator Motors Corp. v. Leistritz

A: holding that new york judiciary law  27b expressly requires use of the date of judgment for conversion of a foreign currency into dollars
B: holding that new york law applies to this matter
C: holding jurisdiction over nonresident defendant existed where note was payable in new york contained new york choice of law clause and proceeds were used to finance new york limited partnership
D: holding that a divorce granted at a foreign consulate in new york was not valid for immigration purposes because it did not comply with new york law
A.