With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". an abuse of discretion. Alternatively, the core of this case is a unique question explored by few courts—this one not among them—namely, what remedies are available to a district court when a complaining witness refuses to submit to a psychological evaluation. This was the. pointed question the Court of Appeals attempted to answer and, more importantly, the issue squarely presented by the petition for review this court accepted. I would answer this question, although admittedly in an unexpected manner. The trial court abused its discretion by failing to provide a legal basis for its ruling and disqualifying K.S. from testifying. The majority suggests the State must shoulder the blame for the district court’s failure to specify a singular reason for its decision and for (2011) (<HOLDING>). Further, the State’s argument regarding the

A: holding a court abuses its discretion when it commits an error of law
B: recognizing that we review a trial courts jury instruc tions for abuse of discretion and that a district court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law internal quotation marks omitted
C: holding that a court abuses its discretion by making clear errors of judgment
D: holding that trial court clearly abuses its discretion if it reaches decision so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount to clear and prejudicial error of law
A.