With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". retaliatory discharge is whether by discharging the complaining employee the employer violated a “clear mandate of public policy.” See Vigil, 102 N.M. at 688, 699 P.2d at 619. A clear mandate of public policy sufficient to support a claim of retaliatory discharge may be gleaned from the enactments of the legislature and the decisions of the courts and may fall into one of sever 91); Salazar v. Furr’s, Inc., 629 F.Supp. 1403, 1409 (D.N.M.1986)(family unity is not public policy protected by retaliatory discharge cause of action); Paca v. K-Mart Corp., 108 N.M. 479, 480-81, 775 P.2d 245, 246-47 (1989)(discharge for violation of company policy did not violate public policy); Francis v. Memorial Gen. Hosp., 104 N.M. 698, 701, 726 P.2d 852, 855 (19 3, 285, 742 P.2d [491,] 495, 497 [(1987)] (<HOLDING>); Vigil, 102 N.M. at 690, 699 P.2d at 621

A: recognizing cause of action for wrongful discharge
B: recognizing the difference between statutory cause of action for retaliation and common law tort of retaliatory discharge
C: recognizing retaliatory discharge cause of action when plaintiff discharged for whistleblowing
D: recognizing retaliatory discharge cause of action when employee discharged to prevent vesting of pension benefits
C.