With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in the outcome” is not undermined by Mickey’s counsel’s alleged deficiencies, Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, and we are persuaded there was no prejudice. B 1 The State also argues that counsel’s interaction with the penalty-phase mental health experts was not deficient. We agree. Counsel put on two mental health experts in the penalty phase. Smith, a toxicologist, testified that Mickey suffered from toxic psychosis, a self-induced drug disorder stemming from provided a Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (“MMPI”), given in 1981, and naval discharge records to Burstein. But these are not the type of public or readily available evidence counsel must obtain, and then provide to experts. Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374, 383-84, 125 S.Ct. 2456, 162 L.Ed.2d 360 (2005) (<HOLDING>); see Raley, 470 F.3d at 801 (ruling sufficient

A: holding that the defendants prior conviction was not obtained in violation of his right to counsel because he had the opportunity for appointed counsel at public expense
B: holding counsel must examine public information like prior conviction records prosecutor is likely to use
C: holding that an employer must permit cpa to examine employers records
D: holding that a prosecutor was disqualified from bringing a recidivist proceeding even though the prior offenses in which the prosecutor served as defense counsel were public matters
B.