With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that the mere deposit of a cashier’s check would be sufficient; instead, the trial court must accept the payment and file the bond, staying the judgment. 5 See D.C. Code § 42-1207(d)(1); Haw. Rev. Stat. § 501-151; Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-269; Ashworth v. Hankins, 241 Ark. 629, 408 S.W.2d 871, 873 (1966); Top Rail Ranch Estates, LLC v. Walker, 2014 COA 9, 327 P.3d 321, 334-35, cert. denied, No. 14SC283 (Colo. Nov. 24, 2014); Vonmitschke-Collande v. Kramer, 841 So. 2d 481, 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002); Vance v. Lomas Mortg. USA, Inc., 263 Ga. 33, 426 S.E.2d 873, 875 (1993); McClung v. Hohl, 10 Kan. App. 93, 61 P. 507, 508 (1900); Weston Builders & Developers, Inc. v. McBerry, LLC, 167 Md. App. 24, 891 A.2d 430, 439-41 (2006); Oldewurtel v. Redding, 421 N.W.2d 2 S.E.2d 876, 880 (2012) (<HOLDING>). 6 The Langes argue that under Cashmere State

A: holding that appellants failed to state a claim regarding real property therefore the lis pendens was improperly granted and could be canceled notwithstanding appeal
B: holding that forfeiture of real property may be adjudicated before the seizure occurs because real property cannot abscond
C: holding that the proponent of a lis pendens must show a fair nexus between the alleged fraudulent transfer and the real property encumbered by the lis pendens
D: holding that a tax appeal on real property is a lien on the real estate and not a personal obligation of the landowner
A.