With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". under the rules of statutory construction, courts should consider other statutes regarding insurance practices, such as the UIPA, to establish standards for good faith. See Romano, 646 A.2d at 1232-33. Since the landmark test for bad faith was announced in Terletsky, however the federal courts sitting in diversity have abstained from applying the rule of construction announced in Romano, and have adhered to the Terletsky standard. See UPMC Health Sys., 391 F.3d at 505-06 (applying the Terletsky test and ignoring violations of the UIPA as evidence of bad faith); Dinner v. United Seros. Auto. Ass’n Cas. Ins. Co., 29 Fed.Appx. 823, 827-28 (3d Cir.2002) (rejecting Romano and its progeny) (non-precedential); Klinger v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 115 F.3d 230, 233-34 (3d Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); Employers Mut. Cas. Co. v. Loos, 476

A: holding that until the supreme court of pennsylvania rules on the issue the third circuit will apply the terletsky standard for bad faith
B: holding that the supreme court will not issue advisory opinion on issue not before the court
C: holding that the supreme court of pennsylvania is a state entity for purposes of the eleventh amendment
D: holding that in a workers compensation case a third party bad faith cause of action does not accrue until judgment is entered on the underlying case
A.