With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Int’l, 290 F.3d 456 (1st Cir.2002) (upholding Rule 11 sanctions of $8,690); Pimentel v. Jacobsen Fishing Co., 102 F.3d 638 (1st Cir.1996) (imposing sanctions of $8,406 on counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 and section 1927); O’Ferral v. Trebol Motors Corp., 45 F.3d 561, 564 (1st Cir.1995) (upholding award of $8,000 in Rule 11 sanctions, while noting that "[n]o one remotely familiar with lawyer fees can doubt that the defense spent vastly more than $8,000 on this case”); Mariani v. Doctors Assocs., Inc., 983 F.2d 5 (1st Cir.1993) (affirming $7,500 in Rule 11 sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel, based on billing records showing that defendants had spent over $14,000 in defending challenged motion); Navarro-Ayala v. Nunez, 968 F.2d 1421, 1428 (1st Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). 34 . The sanctions, though reduced in amount,

A: holding sanction of 250000 under federal rule of bankruptcy procedure 9011 to be excessive and reducing to 5000
B: holding rule 11 sanction proceeding was exempt from automatic stay
C: holding that rule 11 is not properly used to sanction the inappropriate filing of papers where other rules more directly apply
D: holding rule 11 sanction of 20000 to be excessive and reducing to 6500
D.