With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". alter or amend a judgment to award costs does not come within Rule 59(e).” Durham v. Kelly, 810 F.2d 1500, 1503 (9th Cir.1987). And even if Schneider’s motion were cognizable under Rule 59, it was too late, as the “District Court lost jurisdiction 10 days after entry of ... judgment to grant relief under Rule 52(b) or 59.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. of Ill., 434 U.S. 257, 263 n. 7, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978). And although Schneider’s ultimate goal was to get attorneys’ fees, his September 27th motion cannot have been premised on Rule 54. A litigant cannot file a motion for attorneys’ fees when such fees have already been denied; rather, one must appeal that denial or file a motion for reconsideration. See Cal. Med. Ass’n v. Shalala, 207 F.3d 575, 576 — 77 (9th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). In any event, Rule 54 motions for attorneys’

A: holding that when a litigant does not appeal the fee award it becomes final and can be set aside only through a motion for relief
B: recognizing that an attorneys fee award does not become final and ripe for review until the amount is set
C: recognizing that a trial court can set aside verdict
D: holding that an award of arbitration cannot be set aside for mere errors of judgment either as to the law or the facts if the award is within the scope of the submission and the arbitrators are not guilty  of the acts of misconduct set forth in the statute the award operates as a final and conclusive judgment and  however disappointing it may be  the parties must abide by it
A.