With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". education, intelligence, and physical capacities would otherwise permit the employee to perform.” See IBP, Inc. v. Al-Gharib, 604 N.W.2d 621, 633 (Iowa 2000). Burress was fifty years old at the time of the hearing, had a high school degree, and had spent his life working as a manual laborer or skilled trade person. Dr. Jochims found a twenty percent impairment to the body as a whole. He explained that Burress is restricted from bending, climbing l 758, 765-66, 10 N.W.2d 569, 573-74 (1943) (considering claimant’s functional disability of seventy-five to one hundred percent, age of sixty-five, limited education, and non-performance of physical labor since injury to uphold award of permanent total disability); Diederich v. Tri-City Ry., 219 Iowa 587, 594, 258 N.W. 899, 902 (1935) (<HOLDING>). Based on the similar evidence here, we hold

A: holding that the burden of proof is on the claimant
B: holding that claimant may simultaneously receive unemployment benefits and workers compensation for temporary partial disability where statute only precludes receipt of workers compensation for temporary total or permanent total disability if claimant is receiving unemployment benefits
C: holding that the delivery of an eeoc decision to the former attorney of a claimant did not constitute notice to the claimant
D: holding claimant suffered permanent total disability where functional disability was only twentyfive or thirty percent claimant was fiftynine years of age claimant had little or no education and the injury kept the claimant from performing physical work
D.