With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". further, nor was the fact that the dispatcher found no record of the first name given by Appellant sufficient to raise suspicion of criminal activity. St. George, 197 S.W.3d at 822. And, in Holladay, 805 S.W.2d at 473, we determined that any single trait, including nervousness, is not enough to amount to reasonable suspicion. If an encounter is determined to be consensual, reasonable suspicion is unnecessary. Duff, 546 S.W.2d a itation, the deputies did not have specific articulable facts to believe that Appellant was involved in criminal activity, thus, the questioning of Appellant regarding his identity and checks for warrants, without separate reasonable suspicion, went beyond the scope of the stop and unreasonably prolonged its duration. See Brown, 443 U.S. 47, 52-53, 99 S.Ct. 2637 (<HOLDING>). We do not intend to create a bright line rule

A: holding that unless an officer can prove that he or she has a specific basis or belief that an individual was involved in criminal activity their detention will be deemed unconstitutional
B: holding officer may search vehicle for weapons if officer has reasonable belief based on articulable facts that officer or another may be in danger
C: recognizing that an officer must have a reasonable articulable suspicion that the person has been is or is about to be engaged in criminal activity to frisk an individual for weapons and must have probable cause to conduct a further seizure
D: holding that an officer can stop an individual if the officer has reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal activity is underfoot
A.