With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to “[a]pply commonsense understanding to carry out detailed but uninvolved written or oral instructions. Deal with problems involving a few concrete variables in or from standardized situations.” The DOT job of “assembler, production line” also requires Level 2 reasoning development, but it requires an SVP of 3, defined as “[o]ver 1 month up to and including 3 months.” Plaintiffs job as a production line assembler is considered semiskilled in the DOT, but the record is ambiguous as to whether plaintiffs job as actually performed was semiskilled. That distinction matters here, because defendant is arguing that an inconsistency exists between plaintiffs actual performance of past work and his IQ. Moreover, the production line assembly job, like all of plaintiffs prior jobs, is class 000) (<HOLDING>); Brown, 948 F.2d at 270 (holding that the

A: holding that the alj erred in determining that the claimant was disabled when a retrospective diagnosis along with all other medical evidence supported a finding of disability
B: holding that the alj is not obliged to accept an iq if there is a substantial basis in the record for believing that the claimant was feigning the results
C: holding that the claimants intermittent work history as a tree trimmer supported his iq
D: holding that the alj erred in rejecting the iq of a claimant whose work history was limited primarily to working for his father
D.