With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that once a defendant asserts the right of self-representation, the court must make an appropriate inquiry to determine whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived the right to counsel.” Waterhouse v. State, 596 So.2d 1008, 1014 (Fla.1992); see also State v. Roberts, 677 So.2d 264, 265 (Fla.1996) (explaining that Faretta inquiries are required where a defendant has made an unequivocal request for self-representation). In addition, while a defendant does not have a right to “hybrid” representation, Faretta warnings are required whenever the trial court permits a defendant to undertake a portion of his defense that is a “core function” of a lawyer. See Brooks v. State, 703 So.2d 504, 505-06 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); see also Madison v. State, 948 So.2d 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (<HOLDING>). Core functions of a defense lawyer in a

A: holding trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow questions regarding victims status as a child
B: holding that the relevant inquiry is not whether the court has discretion to facilitate notice but whether this is an appropriate case in which to exercise discretion
C: holding that the trial court does not possess the discretion to allow hybrid representation without first conducting a faretta inquiry
D: holding that the trial court should conduct a hearing to allow the parties to be heard including the defendant in person and to allow presentation of additional evidence before sentencing
C.