With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". be "outrightly dismissed as so innocent or susceptible to varying interpretations as to be innocuous,” United States v. Wood, 106 F.3d 942, 946 (10th Cir.1997), including cellular telephones. United States v. Williams, 271 F.3d 1262, 1269 (10th Cir. 2001). Likewise, wrappers from fast food establishments strewn about a car may indicate slovenliness or the need to travel while eating, but do not by themselves indicate a driver smuggling contraband. See United States v. Beck, 140 F.3d 1129, 1138 (8th Cir.1998) (“We also conclude that the mere presence of fast-food wrappers in the Buick is entirely consistent with innocent travel such that, in the absence of contradictory information, it cannot reasonably be said to give rise to suspicion of criminal activity."); Wood, 106 F.3d at 947 (<HOLDING>); Karnes v. Skrut-ski, 62 F.3d 485, 496 (3d

A: holding that a past arrest for possession without more is simply not enough to provide reasonable articulable suspicion that the person is currently in possession
B: holding that possession of a pistol in public requires knowing possession
C: holding that use of deadly weapon extends as well to any employment of a deadly weapon even its simple possession if such possession facilitates the associated felony
D: holding suspicion associated with possession of fastfood trash is virtually nonexistent
D.