With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the prosecutor was referring to Texas Rule of Evidence 902(10). It seems more likely that admissibility of a certified copy of a deed would be governed by Rule 902(4) rather than Rule 902(10) — in any event, we have held that the Rules of Evidence do not apply in a pretrial suppression hearing. Granados v. State, 85 S.W.3d 217, 227 (Tex.Crim.App.2002). The appellant did not challenge the trial court’s ruling on the State's objection, however, in the court of appeals. 4 . In the court of appeals, the State pointed to language in the plea agreement that the appellant had waived "all pretrial motions on file except those matters ruled on by the court,” arguing that this constituted a waiver of the appellant’s right to appeal.' In its opinion on original submission, the court Cir. 1996) (<HOLDING>). 15 . St. George, supra, at 725; State v.

A: holding that whether consent was valid under the fourth amendment is a question of law to be reviewed de novo
B: holding question of law applied to undisputed facts reviewed de novo
C: holding that ojbjective reasonableness is a question of law reviewed de novo  when scope of consent given is the issue on review
D: recognizing that the constitutionality of a statute is a question of law subject to de novo review
C.