With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to force taxi drivers and their employers to settle a labor dispute by withholding renewal of the operators’ licenses. In holding the City’s action preempted, the Supreme Court invoked a long-standing doctrine that the state should not interfere with the bargaining positions of the parties. Golden State, 475 U.S. at 619, 106 S.Ct. at 1401; see also Machinists, 427 U.S. at 146, 96 S.Ct. at 2556 (State laws must not “upset the balance of power between labor and management expressed in our national labor policy.”) (quoting Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Local Union No. 776, 346 U.S. 485, 500, 74 S.Ct. 161, 98 L.Ed. 228 (1953)). See also Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 493 U.S. 103, 108-09, 110 S.Ct. 444, 449-50, 107 L.Ed.2d 420 (1989) (“Golden State II”) (<HOLDING>). In the instant ease, there is no state

A: holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc  1983
B: holding that 42 usc  1983 relief is available in some circumstances where state actions interfere with the bargaining process
C: holding that person in 42 usc  1983 does not include states
D: holding that plaintiffs who sought injunctive relief under 42 usc  1983 could get same relief in a state court mandamus action
B.