With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". As such [t]he rules applicable to the construction of written contracts in general are to be applied in construing a post-nuptial agreement. Such a contract must be considered as a whole, and from such examination the intent of the parties must be gathered. Such construction should be given the agreement, if possible, as will render all of its clauses harmonious, so as to carry into effect the actual purpose and intent of the parties as derived therefrom. Roberts v. Roberts, 381 So.2d 1333, 1335 (Miss.1980). Property settlement agreements are contractual obligations arising on the date of final judgment of divorce and may be specifically enforced by a chancellor if such action is necessary to effectuate the terms of the agreement. See Mount v. Mount, 624 So.2d 1001, 1005 (Miss.1993) (<HOLDING>); Jones v. Jones, 532 So.2d 574, 580

A: holding that as with a promissory note when the final payment was made on a support judgment the obligation was discharged and after that date husband had no obligation that could support a modification
B: recognizing a divorce decree which incorporates a property settlement agreement is a final and conclusive adjudication  
C: holding property settlement to be contractual obligation from date of final judgment of divorce
D: holding that an order pending divorce is not a final judgment that creates a right of appeal
C.