With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". as of his original sentencing date, February 23, 1996. 1 . As the Superior Court noted in Ruthardt, [t]he HGN test is one of several field sobriety tests recommended by the National Highway Traffic Safety Association [ (“NHTSA”) ] to assist officers in determining whether an operator of a vehicle is driving while intoxicated.... The theory behind the test is that there exists a medically proven correlation between the consumption of alcohol and the existence of nys-tagmus in the human eye.... State v. Ruthardt, Del.Super., 680 A.2d 349, 351-52 n. 4 (1996). 2 . See Lampkins v. State, Del.Supr., 465 A.2d 785, 790 (1983) (relevance); Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. Adams, Del.Supr., 541 A.2d 567, 570 (1988) (probative value). 3 . Cf. Best v. State, Del.Supr., 328 A.2d 141, 143 (1974) (<HOLDING>). 4 . Tr. at 11 (ruling from the bench). 5 .The

A: holding that stare decisis is not applicable unless the issue was squarely addressed in a prior decision
B: holding that the doctrine of stare decisis is most frequently applied in cases affecting real property
C: holding that the doctrine of stare decisis applies to the issue of reliability of new scientific techniques the intoxilyzer in that case
D: holding that stare decisis does not apply unless the question at issue was squarely addressed in prior decisions
C.