With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". got into her car and left. (a) Burglary (Counts 1 and 2) The trial court found, and the State concedes, that Andrews’s burglary convictions should have merged because both counts charged Andrews with entering the same building without authority on the same date with intent to commit a felony — theft (Count 1) and rape (Count 2). Accordingly, only one burglary occurred, and the trial court erred in failing to merge Counts 1 and 2 for sentencing purposes. In so holding, we note that the trial court found that these offenses effectively merged because the trial court imposed only one 20-year sentence on Andrews’s convictions for burglary (Counts 1 and 2), aggravated assault (Count 4) and robbery (Counts 5, 6 and 7). See Zachery v. State, 241 Ga. App. 722, 723 (1) (527 SE2d 601) (2000) (<HOLDING>). Nevertheless, because these convictions merge

A: holding that trial court apparently merged two robbery offenses before sentencing as it imposed only one 20year sentence
B: holding that duplicative  922g convictions should have been merged for sentencing purposes
C: holding that when two underlying offenses are charged in an indictment for capital murder the state need only prove one of the two offenses to support the conviction
D: holding these two statutes are not criminal offenses and only affect sentencing
A.