With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". concluded in June 2009, Commerce found the FAO study to be a more reliable data source for whole pangas pricing than the FY2000-01 Gachihata financial statement. Judicial review of anti-dumping duty administrative proceedings is normally limited to the record before the agency in the particular review proceeding at issue and does not extend to subsequent proceedings. 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(b)(2)(A) (defining scope of record for review in proceedings before the Court of International Trade); see S.Rep. No. 96-249, at 247-48, 1979 U.S.C.C.A.N. 381, 633 (1979) (judicial review of antidumping proceedings is based on “information before the relevant decision-maker at the time the decision was rendered”); see also Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 357 F.3d 1294, 1316-17 (Fed.Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). In any case, even if we were to consider the

A: holding that a class action tolls the statute of limitations only for subsequent individual actions not for subsequent class actions
B: holding that new claims for damages could arise from actions that occurred subsequent to the judgment in the original action
C: holding it improper for the court of international trade to consider commerces actions in subsequent antidumping proceeding
D: holding that it was improper for the trial court to instruct the jury that it could not consider the states failure to videotape the defendant
C.