With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the protection of [a lesser standard of review] but are subject to de novo review.” In re Kretzinger, 103 F.3d 943, 946 (10th Cir.1996) (quotation omitted); see also Brue v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 1227, 1232 (10th Cir.2006) (discussing vs., 470 F.3d 509, 513-14 (2d Cir.2006) (finding legal error when “[a]lthough the BIA cited the proper legal standard at the outset of its decision, it failed to apply this deferential standard of review when evaluating the IJ’s credibility finding”). B Under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)©, the BIA cannot “engage in de novo review of findings of fact determined by an [IJ].” Instead, the BIA reviews those facts found by the IJ — including credibility determinations — only to determine whether they are clearly erroneous. Id.; see also RamirezPeyro, 477 F.3d at 641 (<HOLDING>). “A finding is ‘clearly erroneous’ when

A: recognizing that factual findings were clearly erroneous where the record before the court was simply devoid of any basis for the district courts conclusion
B: recognizing that the bia must defer to the factual findings of the ij unless they are clearly erroneous
C: holding that the lower court is the factfinding body and that its findings of fact will not be set aside on appellate review unless they are clearly erroneous
D: holding that appellate court must defer to all implied factual findings supported by record
B.