With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". for documents until after the suit was initiated. Until then it did not even attempt to search its files for the requested documents or review them at all. OL & S was therefore reasonable in believing that the filing of a lawsuit was necessary in order to induce government compliance. b. OL & S Vigorously Pursued Administrative Avenues Before Filing Suit. OL & S took full advantage of the administrative process to resolve its claim prior to filing a lawsuit, and had exhausted the process and reached an impasse before the suit was filed. A number of eases have held that a lawsuit was premature, and therefore unnecessary, when the plaintiff was aware that the agency was attempting to comply with the request. Weisberg v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 848 F.2d 1265, 1271 (D.C.Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>); Ginter v. Internal Revenue Serv., 648 F.2d

A: holding not necessary a suit filed while the government was still searching for the files and the plaintiffs requests were unduly broad
B: holding a suit not necessary where the government sent a telegram explaining the reason for delay and its ongoing attempts to comply and asked for plaintiffs phone number to discuss it plaintiff filed suit the day after receiving the telegram
C: recognizing that if the plaintiff files suit in a county where venue does not lie the plaintiff waives the right to choose and the defendant may have the suit transferred to a proper venue
D: holding that a prior suit and a subsequent suit between the same parties did not involve the same claim because the evidence necessary to sustain the subsequent suit was insufficient to entitle the plaintiff to relief in the prior suit
A.