With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". one month prior to the date of defendant’s arrest; certificate number 128-04 was issued on October 6,2004, less than a month after the arrest. Defendant argues that the trial court’s reliance on these certificates violated his right of confrontation under Crawford, supra, 541 U.S. at 68-69, 124 S.Ct. at 1374, 158 L.Ed.2d at 203. We disagree. In Crawford, the United States Supreme Court determined that when “testimonial evidence” is at issue, dispensing with confrontation solely because testimony is deemed reliable is violative of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. State v. Renshaw, 390 N.J.Super. 456, 462-63, 915 A.2d 1081 (App.Div. 2007) (citing Crawford, supra, 541 U.S. at 68-69,124 S.Ct. at 1374, 158 L.Ed.2d at 203). Thus, in Renshaw, we held tha 183 (2007) (<HOLDING>); State v. Huu The Cao, 175 N.C.App. 434, 626

A: holding that warrants of deportation were properly characterized as nontestimonial official records that were prepared independent of this litigation and were not prepared to prove facts for use in future criminal prosecutions
B: holding that a simulator solution certificate was nontestimonial as it was prepared in a routine manner without regard to whether the certification related to any particular defendant
C: holding that certifications of a breathtest machine are nontestimonial because they are not prepared for any specific defendant or any specific litigation
D: holding that certified records of maintenance are nontestimonial and are not prepared for any particular defendant
B.