With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". agreements and sue for fraud, because many tort victims otherwise would be left with no practical remedy. Id. at 355-56. We note that the weight of authority favors according defrauded tort plaintiffs an election of remedies. See Slotkin v. Citizens Cas. Co., 614 F.2d 301, 312-14 (2d Cir.1979) (applying New York law); Automobile Underwriters V. Rich, 222 Ind. 384, 53 N.E.2d 775, 777 (1944); Ware v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 181 Kan. 291, 311 P.2d 316, 320-21 (Kan.1957); Mlnazek v. Libera, 83 Minn. 288, 86 N.W. 100, 101-02 (Minn.1901); Bilotti v. Accurate Forming Corp., 39 N.J. 184, 188 A.2d 24, 30-35 (N.J.1963); Brown v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., Ltd., 153 Wis. 196, 140 N.W. 1112, 1115 (1913). But see Taylor v. Hopper, 207 Cal. 102, 276 P. 990, 991-92 (Cal.1929) (<HOLDING>); Davis v. Hargett, 244 N.C. 157, 92 S.E.2d

A: holding that economic loss rule precluded the plaintiffs tort claims because they only alleged injuries to the subject of the contract itself
B: holding that defrauded tort plaintiffs may only rescind
C: holding that the uscfc did not have jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim because plaintiffs claim of negligence sounds in tort
D: holding that the plaintiffs stated a claim for conspiracy because they alleged an actionable tort
B.