With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the ACCA in light of our decision in United States v. Simmons, 649 F.3d 237 (4th Cir.2011) (en banc). The Government responded that, while Taste may be entitled to resentenc-ing, he had numerous other violent felonies and/or serious drug offenses that would still render him an armed career criminal subject to a mandatory minimum 180- month sentence. Although the Government posited that the e designating him an armed career criminal based in part on his Massachusetts convictions for larceny from the person. We review de novo a district court’s determination of whether prior offenses qualify as violent felonies fo Cir.1993) (larceny from the person as defined under Massachusetts law constitutes a crime of violence); see also United States v. Jarmon, 596 F.3d 228, 230-33 (4th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

A: holding that virginia conviction for unlawful wounding qualified as a crime of violence under the career offender guidelines residual clause
B: holding that north carolina crime of larceny from the person was a crime of violence under the residual clause of the career offender guideline
C: holding massachusetts conviction for larceny from the person constitutes violent felony under the residual clause of the acca
D: holding that theft from the person is not a crime of violence
B.