With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". cert. denied, 498 U.S. 989, 111 S.Ct. 530, 112 L.Ed.2d 540 (1990) ("We have no trouble finding probable cause to search the trunk of the vehicle for evidence of criminal activity, particularly after the search of its interi- or further corroborated the informant's tip that appellant and his companion were traveling to the Twin Cities to rob a bank.”); United States v. Williams, 526 F.2d 1000, 1002 (6th Cir.1975) (finding probable cause existed to search a vehicle for a weapon because the vehicle matched a detailed broadcast description, the officer saw two occupants reaching toward the floor, a shotgun shell was observed in a trash receptacle, and an apparent kidnapping victim in the car said she had been abducted at gunpoint); United States v. Cage, 494 F.2d 740, 742 (10th Cir.1974)

A: holding that there was probable cause for arrest where officers knew defendants had recently been with suspected drug dealer officers saw defendants car being maneuvered so as to indicate that surveillance had been detected and when officers approached car defendant attempted to place package under car and then pulled the package back inside the car and closed and locked the car door
B: holding that patrol officers acting on a police bulletin concerning an assault and possession of a sawedoff shotgun had probable cause to search a car trunk because the vehicles occupants fit the bulletin description and the officers observed a bloody towel in the car
C: holding that an officer had probable cause to search bags in the trunk of the car when he opened the trunk and smelled a strong odor of methamphetamine
D: holding that the driver of a car who had permission to use the car had standing to challenge its search
B.