With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". defend its interest in the litigation. On appeal, the County also seeks a determination of its right to so appear in the lawsuit. However, we do not address that issue because: (1) the record is unclear as to whether, or on what grounds, the trial court ruled on it; (2) it is inadequately briefed on appeal; and (3) it is unnecessary to our disposition of the appeal. 7 . Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991). 8 . However, judicial immunity is not a bar to prospective injunctive relief against a judicial officer acting in a judicial capacity or to attorney’s fees for obtaining such relief. Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522, 542-44, 104 S.Ct. 1970, 80 L.Ed.2d 565 (1984). 9 . Mireles, 502 U.S. at 12, 112 S.Ct. 286. 10 . Mireles, 502 U.S. at 13, 112 S.Ct. 286 (<HOLDING>); Forrester, 484 U.S. at 227, 108 S.Ct. 538

A: holding that inquiry as to whether officers are entitled to qualified immunity for use of excessive force is distinct from inquiry on the merits of the excessive force claim
B: holding that ordering police officers to use excessive force in bringing a lawyer into court was a judicial act
C: holding that a judge merely acted in excess of his authority in ordering police officers to use excessive force in bringing an attorney to his courtroom for a calendar call
D: holding that deputies use of a police dog is subject to excessive force analysis
B.