With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". David argues that the expiration of the COGSA limitation period extinguished any lien that Pemex had on the vessel. Because no lien on the vessel existed when Pemex filed its complaint, King David argues, the District Court lacked the admiralty jurisdiction to issue the warrant of arrest. It is undisputed that COGSA was incorporated into the parties’ charter agreement and that the one-year statute of limitations applies. The following portions of COGSA assist us in the analysis of this case: Sec. 1. Definitions (а) The term ‘carrier’ includes the owner or the charterer who enters into a contract of carriage with a shipper. Sec. 3. Responsibilities and liabilities of carrier and ship (2) Cargo The carrier shall properly and carefu 20 U.S. 356, 363-364, 64 S.Ct. 128, 88 L.Ed. 96 (1943) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, if we determine that Pemex’s in

A: holding that commerce clause did not provide congress with authority to enact civil remedy provision of violence against women act inasmuch as provision was not regulation of activity that substantially affected interstate commerce
B: holding that commerce clause authorizes congress to punish any particular criminal action even without proof of a relation to interstate commerce when the activity is part of a class of activities determined by congress to affect interstate commerce
C: holding the limitations to congresss commerce clause authority recognized in lopez have no effect on the establishment of the interstate commerce element of the hobbs act
D: recognizing that the timeforsuit clause in the interstate commerce act terminates a substantive claim and its corresponding remedy
D.