With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". N.C. App. at 19, 234 S.E.2d at 209). Here, it is undisputed that Dolven is now the owner of the property, and High Rock no longer has any interest in that property. Only Dolven, as the owner, would benefit from a decision by the DOT allowing a driveway permit. High Rock has assigned all of its rights in the driveway permit application to Dolven, and Dolven has exclusive discretion to decide how to use the property. The DOT has not argued, apart from N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143B-426.40A(b), that this assignment of the driveway permit application is necessarily improper. Dolven is the only party who will be benefitted or injured by the decision on appeal in this case and is, therefore, the real party in interest. See Land v. Tall House Bldg. Co., 150 N.C. App. 132, 133, 563 S.E.2d 8, 9 (2002) (<HOLDING>). Rule 17(a) makes plain that the trial court

A: holding term third party did not include an uninsured motorist carrier
B: holding that a defendant homeowners association was the prevailing party for purposes of attorneys fees when a plaintiff homeowners action was dismissed for failure to prosecute
C: holding that carrier was entitled to intervene as of right where the states workers compensation law permitted subrogation of a compensation carrier
D: holding that insurance carrier for defendant contractor was real party in interest as to third party claim against stucco manufacturer when plaintiff homeowners assigned their right to sue for defects in their house to insurance carrier
D.