With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". sex with and propositioning her. His expression, taken as a whole, lends itself to three possible interpretations: Rogers intended (1) to illicit a sexual response from Emily; (2) to communicate his sexual attraction to her; and/or (3) to compel Emily to view a picture of him masturbating. On any of these interpretations, a jury could reasonably find prurient his sexual interest in and pursuit of a child. The jury could also find shameful his desire to expose Emily to such graphic and sexual-ized content. The Supreme Court’s First Amendment jurisprudence emphasizes a distinction between parties who consent to privately receive and possess obscene materials and those who endure unwilling exposure. Compare Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 568, 89 S.Ct. 1243, 22 L.Ed.2d 542 (1969) (<HOLDING>), with United States v. American Library Ass’n

A: holding that the first and fourteenth amendment forbid criminalizing the private possession of obscenity
B: holding that private possession of child pornography is not protected by the first amendment
C: holding that the fourteenth amendment only applies to state action
D: recognizing first amendment and fourteenth amendment interests in inmate correspondence
A.