With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". reversed. In the interest of complete appellate review, we will also address the three remaining issues. We find that the defendant’s third and fourth issues are without merit. The second issue, however, does have merit and would also require a new trial as to count five of the indictment. After some counts were dismissed, the revised indictment charged the defendant with five crimes which had allegedly occurred on four separate days. Count one alleged that the defendant committed incest with the victim, his step-daughter, on or about September 7,1988. Count two alleged that he raped the victim on or about November 14, 1988. Count th Tenn.1994); State v. Paul Carrier, C.CA No. 03C01-9107-CR-00199, 1992 WL 186544 Sullivan County (Tenn.Crim.App. filed August 6, 1992, at Knoxville) (<HOLDING>); and State v. James R. Blevins, C.C.A. No.

A: holding that evidence of uncharged incest with the same victim is admissible to illustrate the relationship existing between the defendant and the victim
B: holding that prior uncharged sexual conduct between the defendant and the victim is admissible to show their state of intimacy as well as to explain the circumstances surrounding the offense
C: holding that uncharged sexual acts committed upon the same victim are admissible to show the conduct of the defendant toward the victim and to corroborate the evidence of the offense charged in the indictment
D: holding that evidence of prior uncharged sexual conduct with the victim is admissible to corroborate the victims testimony
C.