With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". allegations in Horizon’s petition, the main allegations are that (1) Aon engaged in actionable conduct resulting in the Clauses being included in the Policy, causing damage to Horizon because the amount Horizon could recover under the Policy in English courts under English law was less than the amount that Horizon could recover under the Policy in Texas courts under Texas law, and (2) Aon engaged in actionable conduct resulting in Horizon settling its claims against Beazley under the Policy in English courts under English law for less than Horizon would have settled these claims if Aon had not engaged in the actionable conduct. Horizon is not alleging that there was no coverage under the Policy, that the Policy was invalid due to the llas, 151 Tex. 12, 245 S.W.2d 237, 241-43 (1951) (<HOLDING>); Heath v. Herron, 732 S.W.2d 748, 750

A: holding that an insurance company does not act in bad faith solely because it fails to accept a settlement offer within the deadline set by the injured persons attorney but that a jury question on the reasonableness of the insurers actions arose when an insurance company failed to respond to a deadline to settle a claim within policy limits when the company had knowledge of clear liability and special damages exceeding the policy limits
B: holding that even if an insurance broker is the agent of the insurance company for purposes of soliciting and procuring the policy that would not necessarily make the broker the agent of the insurance company for the purpose of receiving notice of suits and claims
C: holding that under georgia law a holder of a master insurance policy is an agent of the insurance company and not the insurer
D: holding that election of remedies did not apply because it was not inconsistent for company whose dishonest employee cashed company checks made payable to fictitious payees to recover under an insurance policy and then sue the bank that allegedly wrongfully honored the checks
D.