With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". this statute, or its identical predecessors, Section 279-n of the New York General Business Law and subdivision 6 of the former New York Penal Law § 2354, see El Greco Leather Products Co. v. Shoe World, Inc., 599 F.Supp. 1380, 1396 (E.D.N.Y.1984), rev’d on other grounds, 806 F.2d 392 (2d Cir.1986), New York courts have permitted applications for injunctive relief from allegedly criminal conduct directed towards plaintiffs property rights, trademark and good will. See, e.g., Lanvin Parfums, Inc. v. Le Dans, Ltd., 9 N.Y.2d 516, 523, 215 N.Y.S.2d 257, 261, 174 N.E.2d 920, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 834, 82 S.Ct. 58, 7 L.Ed.2d 35 (1961) (allowing injunction under Penal Law § 2354(6)); Clairol, Inc. v. L.H. Martin Value Center, Inc., 40 Misc.2d 875, 876, 244 N.Y.S.2d 210, 212 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1963) (<HOLDING>); Pinaud, Inc. v. Beaux Arts Chemists Corp.,

A: recognizing right to civil injunction under ny penal  2354
B: recognizing a right to contribution
C: recognizing civil contempt power under  105a
D: recognizing a right of access to civil proceedings
A.