With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". guidance we can discern. Williams v. Lee, 358 U.S. 217, 79 S.Ct. 269, 3 L.Ed.2d 251 (1959), is the seminal case in establishing the standard by which non-Public Law 280 states may assert jurisdiction over Indians on reservation land. There the Court held that a state could not exercise jurisdiction in a way that would infringe upon tribal self-government, and set forth the generalized test known as the infringement test. In Williams, a non-Indian was a federally licensed trader residing on the Navaho reservation who sought to collect a debt against an In holding non-Indian logging operations conducted under contract with the tribe and solely on the reservation cannot be taxed by the state); Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes, 425 U.S. 463, 96 S.Ct. 1634, 48 L.Ed.2d 96 (1976) (<HOLDING>); Bryan v. Itasca County, supra (holding a

A: holding that the state has no jurisdiction to pursue an indian onto an indian reservation for criminal offenses committed off the reservation
B: holding that state cannot impose vendor taxes on indian sellers who operate on the reservation
C: holding state may not impose tax on nonindian trader operating on the reservation
D: holding that the arrest of an indian on indian land was illegal because the state had no jurisdiction over the reservation to enforce its laws  including the execution of a search warrant  unless congress consented to the states jurisdiction
B.