With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". § 61, Comment g (Tent.Draft No. 1, 1973).' There is no allegation that the Court of Claims was not a court of competent jurisdiction to decide the issues before it. As a court established under Article III of the Constitution (28 U.S.C. § 171), its judgments are entitled to full judicial weight. 2 . In its recent opinion in Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. Gaudet, 414 U.S. 573, 94 S.Ct. 806, 39 L.Ed.2d 9 (1974), the Court held that a wrongful death action by the widow of a seaman injured as a result of the unseaworthiness of the defendant’s vessel was not merged into a judgment obtained by her husband for personal injuries that he suffered as a result of the unseaworthiness. The Court concluded: “Moragne [v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 375, 90 S.Ct. 1772, 26 L.Ed.2d 339 (1970) (<HOLDING>)] created a true wrongful-death remedy —

A: recognizing cause of action for wrongful death
B: recognizing action for wrongful death based on unseaworthiness
C: holding that passengers claims could not be based on unseaworthiness
D: holding that a failure to include a beneficiary in a wrongful death action is a defect because the wrongful death act restricts plaintiffs to a single action
B.