With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that pursuit of the theory would have opened the door to the fact that Overton was a suspect in many unsolved crimes, which Overton’s counsel attempted to avoid as evidenced by the motion in limine they filed. The claim was facially invalid. Similarly, other paragraphs which assert that counsel improperly failed to impeach Detective Visco with Overton’s statements from the Rachelle Surrett homicide investigation were also properly summarily denied because this would have opened the door to the fact that Overton was a suspect in the unsolved crime involving Surrett. Denial of Claim III, which alleged that the State committed a Brady violation by not providing notes from police profiler brainstorming sessions and documentation of th that this type of claim is without merit. See id. (<HOLDING>). Claim IX, which alleged ineffectiveness

A: holding that one jurors exposure to extraneous information concerning prior criminal acts of the defendant which she did not disclose to the other jurors before they rendered a verdict did not merit a new trial
B: holding that trial court abused its discretion in failing to make a proper inquiry of jurors andor failing to strike jurors for cause after jurors explicitly expressed bias
C: holding that the defendant was not prejudiced when the jurors saw him being searched where the jurors themselves had been frisked
D: holding that the claim of not being able to interview jurors is without merit when the goal is to be able to conduct fishing expedition interviews with jurors after they return a guilty verdict
D.