With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 13 plan and did not object to the Bankruptcy Court’s modification of the automatic stay, her fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims are barred by res judicata. Def.’s Mot. ¶ 7; Def.’s Mem. at 9-10. As support for its position, CGD cites only cases that generally discuss the principal of res judicata, and not specifically the issue of whether a debtor’s causes of action that existed prior to commencement of a bankruptcy case are barred by the confir mation of a Chapter 13 plan. See Def's Mem. at 9 n. 2 (citing Stebbins v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 413 F.2d 1100, 1102 (D.C.Cir.1969) (affirming the district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss on res judicata grounds in an employment discrimination case) and Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. O’Donnell, 136 B.R. 585, 587 (D.D.C.1991) (<HOLDING>)). In response, the plaintiff points out that

A: holding that a bankruptcy courts judgment may be used for res judicata purposes even if the judgment concerned a nondebtor
B: holding that res judicata did not apply where a trial courts order was not a final judgment
C: holding that a bankruptcy courts sale order is a final order for res judicata purposes
D: holding that an unappealed order is a final judgment on the merits for res judicata purposes
A.