With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Elias Velgara-Chavez appeals his conviction for attempted illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentence enhancement pursuant to § 1326(b)(2), and challenges his 51-month sentence as substantively and procedurally unreasonable. We affirm. Velgara-Chavez contends that there was insufficient evidence that he had the specific intent to reenter the United States without the Attorney General’s consent. See United States v. Gracidas-Ulibarry, 231 F.3d 1188, 1196 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (<HOLDING>). We disagree. Most significantly, the

A: holding that specific intent is an element of attempted illegal reentry
B: holding under section 1902a1 specific intent required as an element of section 1501 is the intent to cause the death of an individual
C: holding that attempted sexual abuse is a specific intent crime
D: holding defendant must act with specific intent to cause death of another in order to be convicted of attempted murder
A.