With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". case (2003) (statute of limitations is not jurisdictional and waivable even in the absence of an express waiver); Illinois v. Speller, 46 Ill.App.3d 208, 4 Ill.Dec. 780, 360 N.E.2d 1155 (1977) (same); Pennsylvania v. Darush, 501 Pa. 15, 459 A.2d 727 (1983) (statute of limitations waived by the defendant’s failure to raise it in a pretrial motion); Pennsylvania v. Rossetti, 863 A.2d 1185 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2004) (same). See also Longhibler v. Missouri, 832 S.W.2d 908 (Mo. 1992) (overruling prior decision in Missouri v. Civella, 364 S.W.2d 624 (Mo. Ct. App. 1963) and holding statute of limitations is not jurisdictional and can be waived; a voluntary plea of guilty waives all non-jurisdictional defects, including statute of limitations); James v. Galetka, 965 P.2d 567 (Utah Ct. App. 1998) (<HOLDING>). But see Ohio v. Tolliver, 146 Ohio App.3d

A: holding statute of limitations is jurisdictional and may be raised at any time but noting other ohio appellate courts have held the statute of limitations is not jurisdictional and may be waived if not asserted at the trial level
B: holding that a valid guilty plea waives a statute of limitations defense
C: holding statute of limitations is not jurisdictional and can be waived by a voluntary plea of guilty
D: holding that criminal statutes of limitations are not jurisdictional but are a bar to prosecution which can be waived by a knowing and voluntary guilty plea
C.