With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". JJ., who dissent. 1 . The Trust had entered into a management agreement with Wolford under which Wol-ford was responsible for the contract, including its recording. LARSON, Justice (dissenting). I dissent because section 558.46 does not clearly provide for criminal, as opposed to civil, punishment. In such a case, doubts must be resolved in favor of the defendant. See Rewis v. United States, 401 U.S. 808, 812, 91 S.Ct. 1056, 1059, 28 L.Ed.2d 493, 497 (1971) (“[Ajmbiguity concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity.”). The majority holds that section 558.46(2) i whether a statute imposes civil or criminal sanctions, “we must seek out and give effect to the intention of the legislature.... ” Lenertz v. Mun. Ct., 219 N.W.2d 513, 515-16 (Iowa 1974) (<HOLDING>); see 36A C.J.S. Fines § 2, at 206 (“The true

A: holdingafter considering the statutes whole text legislative history and purpose  that a consumer fraud provision did not impose criminal sanctions
B: holding that the court does not examine legislative history when the statutes text and context are not subject to more than one plausible reading
C: holding that even where there are  contrary indications in the statutes legislative history we do not resort to legislative history to cloud a statutory text that is clear
D: holding that we may consult legislative history as an aid to the interpretation of ambiguous text
A.