With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". an employer. The NIIA, with few exceptions, provides the exclusive remedy “for an employee on account of an injury by accident sustained arising out of and in the course of the employment.” NRS 616A.020(1) (emphasis added). The statute defines an accident as “an unexpected or unforeseen event happening suddenly and violently, with or without human fault, and producing at the time objective symptoms of an injury.” NRS 616A.030. This court has recognized, however, that an employee may avoid the workers’ compensation exclusive remedy provisions when an employer “deliberately and specifically intended to injure [the employee].” Conway v. Circus Circus Casinos, Inc., 116 Nev. 870, 875, 8 P.3d 837, 840 (2000); accord Barjesteh v. Faye’s Pub, 106 Nev. 120, 122, 787 P.2d 405, 406 (1990) (<HOLDING>). A viable intentional tort claim, which

A: holding in an employees action to recover for injury sustained during work against the employer and other defendants did not state an intentional tort claim against contractor
B: holding that once the workers compensation act provides a remedy it is exclusive and the employee has no right to bring an action in commonlaw negligence against his employer
C: holding that an employer who commits an intentional tort against his employee cannot claim that the act was accidental so that workers compensation is the employees exclusive remedy
D: recognizing a tort action when employee was dismissed for filing a workers compensation claim
C.