With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Right to Know Act); Annenberg v. Commonwealth, 562 Pa. 570, 757 A.2d 333 (1998) (appointing a special master to make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding whether a taxing statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution); Pa. State Ass'n of County Comm'rs v. Commonwealth, 545 Pa. 324, 681 A.2d 699 (1996) (appointing a special master to prepare recommendations to the Supreme Court regarding the implementation of the unified judicial system); Commonwealth v. Banks, 612 Pa. 56, 29 A.3d 1129 (2011) (appointing a trial court judge as a special master to make findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to a challenge to the competency of a defendant to be executed). See also In re City of Pittsburgh, 143 Pa.Cmwlth. 618, 600 A.2d 630, 632 (1991) (<HOLDING>). 4 . The grand jury presentment found

A: holding that qualified immunity extends to government officials performing discretionary functions
B: recognizing the qualified immunity from liability extended to a police officer in performing discretionary functions achieves this balance
C: holding that the samaritan act does not immunize doctors from suit when they are performing their normal job functions
D: holding that cjourts historically possess the inherent authority to appoint masters to assist them in performing their various functions
D.