With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". charged Clowers with first-degree murder, accomplished by discharge of a firearm resulting in “death or great bodily harm,” in contravention of sections 782.04(l)(a) and 775.087(1) and (2), Floi'ida Statutes. In the months before trial, defense counsel filed successive suggestions of mental incompetence to proceed, see Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(b), requesting expressly that the trial court appoint two or more psychiatrists to determine appellant’s mental competence. The court appointed only one expert, Dr. William Meadows, to evaluate appellant. Twice the trial court held hearings to determine appellant’s competency, and twice on the strength of Dr. Meadows’ evaluation found appellant competent to proceed. Clowers filed a third suggestion of mental incompete DCA 1992) (<HOLDING>). Having acquiesced in or invited the error of

A: recognizing a defendants right to dismiss retained counsel in favor of appointed counsel
B: holding that an indigent litigants right to appointed counsel has been recognized to exist only where she may be deprived of her physical liberty that the constitution does not require the appointment of counsel for indigent parents in every parentalstatus termination proceeding and that the decision whether due process calls for the appointment of counsel is to be answered in the first instance by the trial court subject to appellate review
C: holding defendant acquiesced in appointment of single competency expert where rather than object to appointment of only one defense counsel informed trial judge counsel had report from single appointed expert indicating defendant was competent
D: holding that a defendant not only has a right to be examined by an expert but also has the right to have an expert appointed to assist him in his defense
C.