With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". linger over the balance; something, even a modest privacy interest, outweighs nothing every time.” Nat’l Ass’n of Retired Fed. Employees v. Horner, 879 F.2d 873, 879 (D.C.Cir.1989). However, an identified public interest must be balanced against the privacy interest. See id. at 874 (requiring this balancing “in order to determine whether, on balance, disclosure would work a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy”). The magnitude of a privacy interest will somewhat differ for the types of information sought. See Nation Magazine, 71 F.3d at 895 (D.C.Cir.1995) (indicating that certain records may implicate a less substantial privacy interest). Indeed, a more substantial privacy interest is implicated in the child victim’s statements, see Favish, 541 U.S. at 170, 124 S.Ct. 1570 (<HOLDING>), than in the disclosure of the names of law

A: recognizing privacy interests of family members against the foia requests of child molesters rapists murders and other violent criminals for autopsies photographs and records  
B: holding that constitutional right of privacy does not apply to medical records
C: holding that the government cannot waive foia exemption 6 on behalf of the individual whose privacy interests the exemption protects
D: recognizing a constitutional right of privacy in mental health records
A.