With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Rollin M. Perkins & Ronald N. Boyce, Criminal Law 108 (3d ed. 1982); Charles E. Torcía, Warton’s Criminal Law § 168 (15th ed. 1994). As with the felony-murder rule in New Mexico, the involuntary-manslaughter statute does not contain any mention of a culpable state of mind or culpable degree of conduct. Under an unmodified and traditional misdemeanor-manslaughter rule and a strict reading of Section 30-2-3(B), the violation of any misdemeanor would be a sufficient predicate for involuntary manslaughter. In felony murder, however, we have held that a strict reading of the “any felony” language of that statute, NMSA1978, § 30-2-1(A)(2) (Repl.Pamp.1994), is inappropriate. E.g., State v. Ortega, 112 N.M. 554, 562-66, 817 P.2d 1196, 1204-08 (1991). To presume conclusively that o , 579 (1987) (<HOLDING>); Commonwealth v. Busler, 445 Pa. 359, 284 A.2d

A: holding that the state must prove criminal negligence for its homicide by vehicle statute even though the statute specifically states that any traffic violation is sufficient
B: holding that under rico plaintiff must prove an injury because of violation of statute
C: holding the state must prove that at the time of the homicide the defendant was engaged in the commission of the felony
D: holding that a violation of a rightofway statute is negligence as a matter of law
A.