With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". at hand precludes. Future claims for future conduct are not included in the release. Indeed, the Settlement Agreement specifically states “nothing in this Release shall be deemed to ... (ii) release a Class Member’s right to assert any claims that independently arise from acts, facts, or circumstances arising exclusively after the end of the Class Period.” (S.A. at 47). The Court overrules the objections by Costello/Robertshaw and Deese that there is no consideration for this release. (See Costello/Robertshaw Obj., Docket Entry # 66; Deese Obj. Docket Entry # 91). This is not a situation where there is “inadequate consideration,” Schwartz, 157 F.Supp.2d at 578 (finding “inadequate consideration”), or where there is “no consideration,” Norman v. McKee, 431 F.2d 769, 774 (9th Cir.1970) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied sub nom. Sec. Pac. Nat’l Bank v.

A: holding no defamation existed
B: holding no liability existed under the circumstances
C: holding a settlement privilege exists as to thirdparty discovery of settlement negotiations
D: holding that no consideration existed for part of the settlement
D.