With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". be whether a dealer in used goods may be held strictly liable under section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, or section 537.760 RSMo 2000. Corrigan, however, is not a dealer in used goods. It is more properly viewed as an intermediate consumer who made an occasional or incidental sale of surplus property. Corri-gan’s business is mechanical contracting, not selling manlifts. It is not subject to section 537.760 because its sale of the man- lift was incidental to and not in the course of its business. In Bruce v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 544 F.2d 442 (10th Cir.1976), the Tenth Circuit, applying Missouri Law, held that Ozark Airlines could not be held strictly liable for defects in an airplane it sold as surplus because it was not engaged in the business A.2d 824 (Law Div.1980) (<HOLDING>); Siemen v. Alden, 34 Ill.App.3d 961, 341

A: holding that amusement ride operators disposal of less favored rides through sale did not rise to the level of being a business of selling
B: holding any improper delegation did not rise to level of plain error
C: holding that a relatively brief delay of less than one hundred days certainly does not rise to the level of presumptive prejudice
D: holding contract for sale of law practice which included duty on part of selling attorney to refer clients as consideration for the sale violated rpc
A.