With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". within the meaning of the applicable regulation. See FAR § 33.207(c)(2)(i) & (ii). Consequently, the critical issue remaining in resolving defendant’s motion to dismiss case No. 90-296 is whether Jones was, at the time of certification, an officer of plaintiff corporation “having overall responsibility for the conduct of [its] affairs.” See FAR § 33.-207(c)(2)(ii). B The second category of certifying corporate representative, defined in FAR § 33.-207(c)(2)(ii), has been interpreted to require “ ‘overall responsibility for the conduct of the contractor’s affairs’ in general.” Grumman, 927 F.2d at 580. In Grumman, the Federal Circuit made it clear that responsibility for a particular aspect of a company’s business is not sufficient to meet the “overall responsibility” test. See id. (<HOLDING>). Plaintiff argues that Grumman can be

A: holding that senior vice president in charge of financial affairs could not properly certify under second prong of test
B: holding that a motion to certify a district court order for interlocutory appeal is dispositive
C: holding that plaintiffs failure to mention vice president of thirdparty company in initial disclosures was harmless because plaintiffs mentioned president of company and defendants conducted no discovery of company
D: holding that a disclosure by a vice president and sales manager of a corporation did not constitute waiver because he did not seek authorization from the board of directors
A.