With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Statutes § 52-72 (a) (“[a]ny court shall allow a proper amendment to civil process which has been made returnable to the wrong return day or is for any other reason defective, upon payment of costs taxable upon sustaining a plea in abatement”); Coppola v. Coppola, 243 Conn. 657, 663, 707 A.2d 281 (1998) (“the pmpose of § 52-72 is to provide for amendment of otherwise incurable defects that go to the court’s jurisdiction” [internal quotation marks omitted]). In the present case, the scrivener’s error appeared on the writ of summons. Pursuant to § 52-72, the court properly allowed the plaintiff to amend its process to reflect a correct return date. See Coppola v. Coppola, supra, 243 Conn. 664-66; Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax Review, 229 Conn. 618, 625-26, 642 A.2d 1186 (1994) (<HOLDING>). The defect in process was curable, and

A: holding the correct date to use when determining the controlling statute is date upon which the claim arose
B: holding that plaintiff could amend its process to correct return date even though return date already passed
C: holding correct date to use when determining controlling statute is date upon which claim arose
D: holding that the date of the federal indictment not the date of the state arrest was the triggering date for the speedytrial act
B.