With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that: We have consistently held that all forms of homicide rationally supported by the evidence, whether they be lesser-included or alternative offenses, should be placed before the jury. To truncate the definitions of the murder statute and thus deny a jury the mechanism to decide which of the forms of murder has been proven is unacceptable. [Id. at 530-31, 601 A.2d 175.] That principle has been repeatedly reiterated by this Court. See Mejia, supra, 141 N.J. at 484, 662 A.2d 308 (noting that a capital “jury must be given every opportunity to convict of the charge not carrying the death penalty” and disapproving of a sequential charge) (quoting John M. Cannel, New Jersey Criminal Code, Annotated, comment 13 to N.J.S.A. 2C:1-8(e) (1994)); Dixon, supra, 125 N.J. at 256, 593 A.2d 266 (<HOLDING>). The Court today finds that the error did not

A: holding that where the writings on file were insufficient to constitute an effective charge a charge had not been effectively filed despite the fact that the eeoc had assigned the case a charge number
B: holding that the felonymurder charge must be submitted to the jury in a capital case where the evidence clearly indicates the appropriateness of the charge
C: holding that the constitutional guarantee of a right to trial by jury includes the right to a complete and correct charge of the law so that each issue of fact raised by the evidence will be submitted to the jury on proper instructions
D: holding that whether a jury charge comments on weight of evidence is determined by looking at the jury charge as a whole not isolated statements
B.