With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (2007). Regardless whether "no contact” was a condition, there is no dispute Coker and Golden failed to meet the condition of changing their living arrangements. 2 . See Shumpert v. City of Fulton, 77 F.3d 474 (5th Cir. 1995) (when relationships outside of marriage occur "between government employees, any right to such relations that might normally exist may be properly tempered by a state's heightened interest in regulating the conduct of its employees.”); Shawgo v. Spradlin, 701 F.2d 470, 483 (5th Cir. 1983) ("we .can ascertain a rational connection between the exigencies of Department discipline and forbidding members of a quasi-military unit, especially those different in rank, to share an apartment or to cohabit”); Mercure v. Van Buren Twp., 81 F.Supp.2d 814, 827 (E.D. Mich. 2000) (<HOLDING>). See also Hughes v. City of N. Olmsted, 93

A: holding that the initial stop by officer was based on reasonable suspicion that defendant was impersonating a police officer although another officer arrested defendant for privacy act violation
B: holding police officer is a public official
C: recognizing affirmative duty of a police officer to prevent the violation of constitutional rights by another officer
D: holding that discharge of a police officer for the choice to enter into a relationship with the wife of his superior officer on the force was rational
D.