With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". but he admitted the factual basis of the drug distribution charge under oath. Guerra sought to withdraw his guilty plea before sentencing, but that motion came six.months after he entered the plea. Because we do not find Guerra has shown a fair and just reason to withdraw his plea, we need not consider whether the government would be prejudiced. United States v. Has No Horses, 261 F.3d 744, 750 (8th Cir.2001), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1114, 151 L.Ed.2d 1008 (2002). Even though we do not normally decide ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct review, because the record is adequately developed in this case, we conclude Guerra’s claim fails. United States v. Cole, 262 F.3d 704, 710 (8th Cir.2001); see also United States v. Hernandez, 281 F.3d 746, 749 (8th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). The record includes Guerra’s testimony of his

A: holding ineffective assistance of counsel claims may be decided on direct appeal where the district court has developed a record on the ineffectiveness issue
B: holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be brought in collateral proceedings not on direct appeal
C: holding that we review ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal only in the unusual cases where the record is sufficiently developed or the legal representation is so obviously inadequate that it denies a defendant his sixth amendment right to counsel
D: holding that an ineffective assistance of counsel claim must be raised on direct appeal when the facts supporting the claim are presented on the face of the record
A.