With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Bailey maintained an objection on the stipulated testimony and the admission of the eight-millimeter tape as fruits of the poisonous tree in order to appeal the suppression issue. Given the unusual circumstances of the trial proceedings, the court engaged in a colloquy with Bailey to ensure that he understood the proceedings and the rights he was foregoing. 8 . We have addressed in several cases the effect of police deception in contexts different than that presented here. For example, in State v. Barlow we held that consent that resulted from submitting to an officer's false claim of lawful authority to search regardless of a warrant is constitutionally impermissible. 320 A.2d 895, 900 (Me.1974); cf. Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968) (<HOLDING>). When confronted with undercover agents

A: holding that search of backpack constituted a search of defendants person and was not authorized by search warrant for premises
B: holding that consent was freely and voluntarily given despite officers advisement that the police could get a search warrant if consent was not given
C: holding threat to obtain a search warrant if individual does not consent to a search is just one factor in deciding whether the totality of the circumstances supports a voluntary consent finding
D: holding that a consent to search that is given only after an official falsely asserts possession of a search warrant is unconstitutional
D.