With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". The collateral bar rule provides that “a party may not violate an order and raise the issue of its unconstitutionality collaterally as a defense in the criminal contempt proceeding.” In re Providence Journal Co., 820 F.2d 1342, 1346 (1st Cir.1986) (“Providence I”), modified on reh’g en banc, 820 F.2d 1354 (1987) (“Providence II ”). “Rather, the appropriate method to challenge a court order is to petition to have the order vacated or amended.” Id. The rationale for this rule is “both to protect the authority of the courts when they address close questions and to create a strong incentive for parties to follow the orderly process of law.” Id. at 1347. In short, “no man can be judge in his own case.” Walker v. City of Birmingham, 388 U.S. 307, 320, 87 S.Ct. 1824, 18 L.Ed.2d 1210 (1967) (<HOLDING>). Although Mourad acknowledges the general

A: holding that petitioners who deliberately violated injunction without first attempting to dissolve injunction were properly convicted of criminal con tempt
B: holding that plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction
C: holding that the injunction did not constitute a claim
D: holding federal injunction countermanding a state court injunction did not violate antiinjunction act
A.