With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". State improperly withheld Rosario material at his trial. Pratt’s motion annexed a DD-5 police report, allegedly prepared by one of the investigating officers, that memorialized taking Aponte on a neighborhood canvass on June 17,1993 in hopes of locating Pratt. The report indicated that before Aponte viewed the photograph array and the lineup, the detective took Aponte on a neighborhood canvass and displayed a photograph of Pratt to a person identified as Juan Rodriguez. Pratt argued that by deliberately withholding this form, which suggested that Aponte had access to a photograph of Pratt before the lineup, the prosecution engaged in misconduct by attempting to mislead the court at the Wade hearing. See United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 235-38, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967) (<HOLDING>). After initially arguing that the DD-5 report

A: recognizing that brooks protects against denial of counsel at a critical stage of his trial
B: holding that sentencing is a critical stage of criminal proceedings and the offer of counsel must be renewed at each critical stage where the defendant appears without counsel
C: holding that the filing of a motion for a new trial is a critical stage of the prosecution and that an indigent defendant is constitutionally entitled to the assistance of counsel at that stage
D: holding postindictment lineup is critical stage of trial at which defendant is entitled to presence of counsel
D.