With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". upholding Nevada statute requiring individual to provide name in the course of a valid Terry stop based upon specific objective facts establishing reasonable suspicion). After the Court’s ruling, section 38.02(a)-(b) was amended, effective September 1987, to read as follows: (a) A person commits [the] offense [of failure to identify] if he intentionally refuses to report or give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information. (b) A person commits an offense , at 388-89 & n. 158 (stating, “it is to be doubted whether there is any valid reason for automatic warrant checks on mere passengers”). 59 . Kothe, 152 S.W.3d at 64; see Tucker v. State, 183 S.W.3d 501, 509 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2005, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Petty v. State, 696 S.W.2d 635, 638

A: holding police officers making a traffic stop could order passengers out of the stopped car
B: holding that an officer making a traffic stop may order passengers to exit the car pending completion of the stop
C: holding that passengers of a vehicle which they did not own had standing to challenge the validity of a traffic stop
D: holding officers had reasonable suspicion to identify passengers and check for outstanding warrants after traffic stop when the officers previously had been notified that car contained named felony parole violator
D.