With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". § 51.17. 9 . See Brenan v. Court of Appeals, 444 S.W.2d 290, 292 (Tex.1968); see also Tex Fam.Code § 56.01. 10 . Although former Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 81(b)(1) was in effect at the time this case was tried, there was no substantive change when new rule 44.1 was promulgated. See TexR.App. P. 44 note. We therefore cite to the current rule, which provides: No judgment may be reversed on appeal on the ground that the trial court made an error of law unless the court of appeals concludes that the error complained of: (1) probably caused the rendition of an improper judgment; or (2) probably prevent mission of explanation of allegations was "fundamental” error and no harmful error analysis was necessary); In re R.W., 884 S.W.2d 502, 502 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1994, writ denied) (<HOLDING>); In re T.F., 877 S.W.2d 81, 82

A: holding that failure to give proper instruction regarding disputed element of crime charged was fundamental error requiring reversal and stating that fundamental error is not subject to harmless error review
B: holding that explanations of allegations and possible consequences of the proceeding were mandatory and that failure to give these explanations was reversible error
C: holding that when none of the required explanations were given that was fundamental error requiring reversal
D: holding that failure to explain allegations and possible consequences was fundamental error that required reversal even though the juvenile had not raised this in his brief
C.