With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". added). By that reasoning, Barney essentially excised a fall down stairs from the scope of traumatic event. Thereafter, in Gable v. Board of Trustees, Public Employees’ Retirement System, 115 N.J. 212, 557 A.2d 1012 (1989), we again addressed the issue of a fall down stairs, among other happenings. There, Stephen Gable, a corrections officer, suffered injuries as a result of several physical struggles with inmates. Id. at Sys., 309 N.J.Super. 112, 706 A.2d 793 (App.Div.) (concluding whiplash from bus being rear-ended and driver being thrown forward into steering wheel and back against seat not great rush of force), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 380, 718 A.2d 1209 (1998); compare also Duignan v. Bd. of Trs., Pub. Employees’ Ret. Sys., 223 N.J.Super. 208, 538 A.2d 432 (App.Div. 1988) (<HOLDING>), with Caminiti v. Bd. of Trs., Police &

A: holding the conflict preemption principle announced in pilot life and clarified in rush prudential remains in force
B: holding force to be an element of pre1994 amendment  111 which may be satisfied by proof of force or threat of force
C: holding that like most rights speedy trial can be waived
D: holding invasion of broom bristles in sensitive organ like eye can be great rush of force
D.