With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". its decision to withhold the video from defendants pending the outcome of its declaratory judgment action. There is no indication the district court misapplied this standard. Riverdale contends its reliance on advice of counsel establishes its defense of “good-faith, reasonable delay” as a matter of law. We disagree. Under Iowa law, advice of counsel does not automatically establish good faith, but it is a factor to consider in determining whether a party acted in good or bad faith. See, e.g., Ferris v. Emp’rs Mut. Cas. Co., 255 Iowa 511, 518, 122 N.W.2d 263, 267 (1963) (reversing bad-faith judgment against insurer that relied on attorney who was “able and long experienced in the handling of this class of cases”); Schnathorst v. Williams, 240 Iowa 561, 579, 36 N.W.2d 739, 749 (1949) (<HOLDING>); Ahrens v. Ahrens, 386 N.W.2d 536, 538 (Iowa

A: holding that section 1983 claims alleging due process violations stemming from malicious prosecution are unavailable when a state malicious prosecution action exists
B: holding that malicious prosecution claim accrues when underlying prosecution is terminated
C: holding that violation of city ordinance does not constitute negligence per se
D: holding advice of counsel does not per se immunize a person from a malicious prosecution suit
D.