With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". issues. Issues not argued on appeal are forfeited. Indep. Towers, 350 F.3d at 929-30. Although he had filed an appeal from the fee award, Sternberg did not present an argument — or even a bare request — to set aside the district court’s $24,491 award, so he forfeited his appeal of that issue. Sternberg’s present appeal challenges the district court’s conclusion that we did not vacate the $24,491 award in our earlier opinion. As our opinion did not mention that fee award, the district court was correct. We will “not consider a new contention that could have been but was not raised on the prior appeal.” Munoz v. Imperial Cnty., 667 F.2d 811, 817 (9th Cir.1982); see Jimenez v. Franklin, 680 F.3d 1096, 1099-1100 (9th Cir.2012); In re Cellular 101, Inc., 539 F.3d 1150, 1155 (9th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). Since Sternberg could have— but did not —

A: holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal
B: holding that it would be a manipulation of the court system for party that had not raised all relevant issues in its first appeal to be allowed a second bite at the apple
C: holding that issues not raised before the district court cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal
D: holding that issues not raised in the trial court may not be raised later on appeal
B.