With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that " 'a public employee’s freedom of speech is not sacrificed merely because the employee arranges to communicate privately with his employer rather than to spread his views before the public.' ” Kurtz, 855 F.2d at 727 (quoting Givhan v. W. Line Consol. School Dist., 439 U.S. 410, 415-16, 99 S.Ct. 693, 697, 58 L.Ed.2d 619 (1979)). However, while not dis-positive, the employee’s attempt at public communication is still a relevant factor in the "public concern” analysis. See Kurtz, 855 F.2d at 729 ("Kurtz’s profession of public concern loses force when it is considered that he took no affirmative steps ... to inform the public at large about, the problems with which he was so gravely concerned.”). See also Terrell v. Univ. of Texas Sys. Police, 792 F.2d 1360, 1362-63 (5th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1064, 107 S.Ct. 948,

A: holding that it seems clear that when the contents of a  communication are captured or redirected in any way an interception occurs at that time but also since the definition of interception includes the aural acquisition of the contents of the communication the interception must also be considered to occur where the redirected contents are first heard
B: holding that as to each predicate act the plaintiff must allege the time place and contents of the misrepresentations
C: holding that an fbi agents investigation of the written contents of a notebook that was lawfully in the possession of the fbi constituted a search that violated the defendants fourth amendment rights
D: holding that the contents of a notebook were not protected speech based in part on the fact that appellant made no effort to communicate the contents of the notebook to the public
D.