With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Ga. 822, 824 (653 SE2d 729) (2007) (punctuation omitted); see also OCGA § 50-21-26 (a) (3). 6 Cummings, 282 Ga. at 824; see also Kim v. Dep’t of Transp., 235 Ga. App. 480, 481 (2) (510 SE2d 50) (1998) (“By its own terms, the State Tort Claims Act must be strictly construed.”). 7 Ga. Dep’t of Transp. v. Baldwin, 292 624, 625 (532 SE2d 401) (2000); see also Antonin Scalia & Bryan Gamer, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 69 (1st ed. 2012) (“The ordinary-meaning rule is the most fundamental semantic rule of interpretation.”). 12 Cummings, 282 Ga. at 824. 13 See id. at 825-26 (plaintiff complied with statute when she named the agency she believed to be responsible at the time she served her initial notice); Ga. Ports Auth. v. Harris, 274 Ga. 146, 150 (2) (549 SE2d 95) (2001) (<HOLDING>); Norris v. Dep’t of Transp., 268 Ga. 192, 193

A: holding that delivery by federal express satisfied the personal delivery requirement of ocga  502126 and that receipt requirement was satisfied when plaintiff obtained a copy of the fedexed letter that was stamped as received by doas
B: holding that challenge to oneyear residency requirement for divorce action was not moot even though plaintiff had since satisfied requirement
C: holding that issuance of an order to show cause satisfied this requirement
D: holding that presentation of an untimely petition to the states highest court satisfied the exhaustion requirement
A.