With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". definite and particular to convince a reasonable person that bias exists; simple conclusions, opinions, or rumors are insufficient.” United States v. Sykes, 7 F.3d 1331, 1339 (7th Cir.1993). The factual allegations must fairly support the charge of bias or impartiality and must be specific — including definite times, places, persons, and circumstances. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d at 1199. And while a court must assume the truth of the factual assertions, it is not bound to accept the movant’s conclusions as to the facts’ significance. Id. at 1199-1200. Moreover, “[bjecause the statute is heavily weighed in favor of recusal, its requirements are to be strictly construed to prevent abuse.” Sykes, 7 F.3d at 1339; see also United States v. Burger, 964 F.2d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). Unlike a motion to recuse under 28 U.S.C. §

A: holding  2513 to be jurisdictional and therefore must be strictly construed
B: holding that  144 affidavits should be strictly construed against the affiant and that movants bear a substantial burden to show actual partiality
C: holding dormancy statutes should be strictly construed
D: holding that in presence of any doubt a penal statute is to be strictly construed
B.