With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". actions. Defs.’ Mot. at 33-35, 40-41. Because the Court concludes that the plaintiff plainly fails to establish a prima facie case of race discrimination, it need not consider whether or not the actions at issue qualify as “adverse.” 14 . Neither party submitted affidavits or deposition transcripts from Cooper or Dom, nor does the plaintiff refer to either employee in her opposition to the defendants' motion for summary judgment. See generally PL's Opp. 15 . The defendants argue that the plaintiff's unsworn declaration is, on its face, inadmissible hearsay, which fails to satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1746 (2000) (Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury). Defs.' Reply at 6-7; see Commercial Drapery Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 133 F.3d 1, 6 (D.C.Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). Section 1746 states that an unsworn

A: holding that it was an abuse of discretion for the district court at the summary judgment stage to consider information from an affidavit based on inadmissible hearsay rather than the affiants personal knowledge
B: holding that a court may not consider hearsay contained in an affidavit when ruling on a summary judgment motion
C: holding that hearsay in affidavit which would be inadmissible in evidence at trial could not be considered on motion for summary judgment
D: holding that an affidavit  consisting entirely of inadmissible hearsay is not sufficient to survive summary judgment
D.