With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court cannot act on a motion for summary judgment without giving the opposing party a reasonable opportunity to submit affidavits that contradict the affidavits submitted in support of the motion and that demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact); Winbourne v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 632 F.2d 219 (2d Cir.1980) (purpose of Rule 56(c) is to permit nonmoving party a meaningful opportunity to challenge motion for summary judgment). Recognizing the importance of giving the nonmovant a meaningful opportunity to respond to a motion for summary judgment, this circuit has strictly enforced the requirement of a 10 day advance notice that the court will take a motion for summary judgment under advisement as of a certain date. E.g., Griffith v. Wainwright, 772 F.2d 822, 825 (11th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>). The reasons for such a requirement “are

A: holding that when a court sua sponte converts a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment the court must give at least 10 days notice to the nonmovant
B: holding that district court has limited authority under rule 59 to alter or amend judgment sua sponte so long as court acts within 10 days of entry of judgment
C: holding that district court has discretion when deciding to convert a defendants motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment
D: holding that a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment precluded default judgment
A.