With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in attorney’s fees, but, as a result of settlements, the amount presently in dispute is $265,948.41. Similarly, the total cubic yards taken were initially 248,296; on account of the settlement, the total cubic yards still in dispute have been reduced to 196,808. These revised figures are reflected in the Decree, post. 4 . See La. Const. art. 6, §§ 1, 38 (recognizing parishes and levee districts as political subdivisions of the State). 5 . La. Const. art. 1, § 4(G) was added after the taking involved in this case and does not apply on that account. 6 . La. R.S. 29:721 et seq. 7 . The Supreme Court prospectively overruled St. Julien in Lake, Inc. v. La. Power & Light Co., 330 So.2d 914 (La.1976). See also City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., 412 So.2d 975, 977 (La.1981) (<HOLDING>). The Louisiana Legislature responded to this

A: holding that schlitz was overruled to that extent
B: holding that lake only overruled st julien prospectively
C: holding that almendareztorres was not overruled by apprendi
D: holding that the act applies prospectively to complaints filed after its effective date
B.