With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Judge. This appeal arises from a judgment entered by the Baldwin Circuit Court in postdivorce enforcement proceedings involving an agreement incorporated into that court’s 2002 judgment of divorce dissolving the marriage of Gregg D. Schoen (“the former husband”) and Pamela M. Jurenka (“the former wife”). Because we have concluded that the former husband’s appeal was not timely taken, we dismiss the appeal. See Rule 2(a)(1), Ala. R.App. P.; and Wallace v. Tee Jays Mfg. Co., 689 So.2d 210, 211 (Ala.Civ.App.1997) (<HOLDING>). In June 2002, the former husband filed a

A: holding statute of limitations is jurisdictional and may be raised at any time but noting other ohio appellate courts have held the statute of limitations is not jurisdictional and may be waived if not asserted at the trial level
B: recognizing that a court may rely on matters of which a court may take judicial notice
C: recognizing that a court may take judicial notice of court filings and other matters of public record
D: holding that jurisdictional matters are of such magnitude that appellate courts should take notice of them at any time and may do so even ex mero motu
D.