With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Plaintiff Shannon C. Horita appeals the district court’s decision to grant Defendant Kauai Island Utility Cooperative’s motion for summary judgment in this employment-related diversity case. We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Dietrich v. John Ascuaga’s Nugget, 548 F.3d 892, 896 (9th Cir.2008). 1. The district court properly held that Plaintiff had faile f a discriminatory motive until later does not change the outcome under a straightforward application of the statute of limitations. See id. (<HOLDING>). 2. We do not reach Plaintiffs claims of

A: holding that the relevant time is the time of the employment decision
B: holding that the statute of limitations for an employment discrimination lawsuit by a college professor who did not receive tenure began when the college made the tenure decision and communicated that decision to the plaintiff
C: holding that termination is an adverse employment action
D: holding that the only alleged discrimination occurred  and the filing limitations periods therefore commenced  at the time the adverse employment action was made and communicated to the plaintiff
D.