With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". use in the case; (5) Docket fees under section 1923 of this title; (6)Compensation of court appointed experts, compensation of interpreters, and salaries, fees, expenses, and costs of special interpretation services under section 1828 of this title. A bill of costs shall be filed in the case and, upon allowance, included in the judgment or decree. 28 U.S.C. § 1920. In Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 441-42, 107 S.Ct. 2494, 2497, 96 L.Ed.2d 385, 391 (1987), the Supreme Court held that federal courts are limited to assessing only those costs enumerated under § 1920. However, it is generally accepted that courts are free to interpret the meaning of the costs stated within § 1920. See Alflex Corp. v. Underwriters Labs., Inc., 914 F.2d 175, 176-77 (9th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 812, 112 S.Ct. 61, 116

A: holding that extrinsic evidence is permissible to interpret an ambiguous contract
B: recognizing appellate courts are not free to rewrite rules
C: holding that courts are free to interpret what constitutes taxable costs after crawford
D: holding that the failure to object to a trial courts instruction constitutes waiver
C.