With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Goodyear undertook a duty to warn of K-rim dangers. Under these circumstances, it seems to us that Goodyear had a continuing duty to instruct and to warn, so that users of used K-rims would be apprised of safety hazards which, at an earlier time, were not fully appreciated. Id. (citation omitted). Relying on Hodder, a few Minnesota courts and federal courts applying Minnesota law have recognized or discussed post-sale duties to warn. See, e.g., T.H.S. Northstar Assocs. v. W.R. Grace & Co., 66 F.3d 173, 177 (8th Cir.1995) (affirming district court’s decision to allow a jury to determine whether asbestos manufacturer breached its post-sale duty to warn of dangers relating to its asbestos products); Ramstad v. Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings Corp., 836 F.Supp. 1511, 1517 (D.Minn.1993) (<HOLDING>); Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co., 707 F.Supp.

A: recognizing under illinois law that pharmaceutical manufacturer has duty to warn of any dangers associated with offlabel use of product if such dangers were reasonably known
B: holding a manufacturer had no postsale duty to warn of dangers associated with an auger because numerous hodder factors were not present
C: holding manufacture had no duty to warn of the dangers of smoking because the dangers of cigarette smoking have long been known to the community
D: holding that manufacturer had no duty to warn its purchasers retailer and transporter of gas of dangers where those purchasers had operated a gas business for years were familiar with the trade journals and already knew the dangers
B.