With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v. City of Schenectady, 97 N.Y.2d 78, 735 N.Y.S.2d 868, 761 N.E.2d 560, 564 (2001) (invalid warrant). 3 . See, e.g., Rhodes v. Mabus, 676 F.Supp. 755, 758-59 (S.D.Miss.1987) (prosecutor improp- - erly communicated with grand jurors); - Bearden v. BellSouth Telecomms., Inc., 29 So.3d 761, 766 (Miss.2010) (lack of jurisdiction); Parrish v. Marquis, 172 S.W.3d 526, 533 (Tenn.2005) (charges outside statute of limitations); Palmer Dev. Corp. v. Gordon, 723 A.2d 881, 884 (Me.1999) (charges outside statute of limitations); Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1246 (D.C.1986) (failure to state a claim). 4 .See, e.g., Schlueter v. S. Energy Homes, Inc., 252 Fed.Appx. 7, 10-11 (6th. Cir.2007) (speedy trial dismissal not a favorable termination); Donahue v. Gavin, 280 F.3d 371, 384 (3d Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Brayshaw v. Garrett, No. 4:10CV272, 2011 WL

A: holding that a nolle prosequi does not indicate innocencewhere the prosecutor simply reasoned that the plaintiff was  not likely to receive any additional jail time if convicted in a retrial
B: holding that the defendants possession of contraband in a jail was not the result of a voluntary act on his part because officers brought him into the jail under arrest
C: holding that trial judge was not authorized to impose jail time as condition of probation and deleting the 90 day jail penalty
D: holding that the evidence was insufficient to prove the offense of supplying contraband to a jail because the defendant was not in possession of the drugs when he was taken to jail where the arresting officer entered the jail with the drugs
A.