With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v. Bennett Enters., 211 Fed.Appx. 452, 456 (6th Cir.2006) (same burden-shifting analysis applies to claims under Title VII and § 1991). III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment to ODOT and Violet. 1 . The district court did not err in finding that the alleged instruction by Ejikeme's supervisor to shoot him in 1992 and Ejikeme’s coworker’s alleged attempt to run him over with a truck in 1995 were not sufficiently related to his other hostile work environment allegations to form one continuous hostile work environment and were thus untimely. See, e.g., Wheaton v. N. Oakland Med. Ctr., 130 Fed.Appx. 773 (6th Cir.2005) (citing Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 105, 122 S.Ct. 2061, 153 L.Ed.2d 106 (2002) (<HOLDING>)). In addition, it appears that Ejikeme did not

A: holding that a courts task is to determine whether the acts about which an employee complains are part of the same actionable hostile work environment practice
B: holding that an individual could recover for acts occurring outside the statutory time period if at least one act occurred within the time period and the acts were part of the same hostile work environment
C: recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983
D: holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive
A.