With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". automatic license revocation requirement also contravenes section 525 of the Code, which provides in relevant part that a governmental unit may not deny, revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew a license ... against ... a person that is or has been a debtor under this title ... because such bankrupt or debtor ... has not paid a debt that is dischargeable in the case under this title or that was discharged under the Bankruptcy Act. 11 U.S.C. § 525(a). For these reasons, also as recognized by the bankruptcy court, the automatic revocation provision of Utah Code Ann. § 61-2a-9 violates the Supremacy Clause, United States Const., art. VI, cl. 2, and is thus unconstitutional. See In re Walker, 91 B.R. at 975 n. 11; see also Granger v. Harris (In re Harris), 85 B.R. 858, 862 (Bankr.D.Colo.1988) (<HOLDING>). Having properly found the automatic

A: holding equivalent automatic license revocation provision of colorado real estate statute unconstitutional
B: holding revocation of appellants medical license not barred by previous acquittal on charge of criminal abortion even though criminal charge was basis of license revocation proceeding
C: holding witness not licensed as real estate appraiser could not testify as expert on real estate valuation where statute made it unlawful to engage in real estate appraisal without license
D: holding prospectively that a vendees interest in a real estate contract constitutes real estate within the meaning of the judgment lien statute
A.