With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". others in any one crash ... Fla. Stat. § 324.021(7). There is nothing in § 324.021(9)(b)(2) that imposes any penalties or liabilities on lessors of motor vehicles who do not maintain these minimum levels of insurance. While not dispositive, Florida case law supports the Court’s interpretation that § 324.021(9)(b)(2) is simply a cap on strict vicarious liability damages and nothing more. See, e.g., Lewis v. Enterprise Leasing Co., 912 So.2d 349, 351 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“The legislature enacted section 324.021(9)(b), Florida Statutes, in order to limit such liability and to shift responsibility for damages arising out of motor vehicle accidents from innocent owners and lessors of motor vehicles to those at fault.”); Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Hughes, 833 So.2d 832, 838 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (<HOLDING>); Folmar v. Young, 591 So.2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA

A: holding that requiring the jury to unanimously find liability for exemplary damages necessarily includes a finding on the underlying theory of liability
B: holding that a further finding that the insured intended to injure the defendant would preclude any liability for the insurer for indemnification of compensatory or punitive damages
C: holding that defendant  whose liability for the acts of its employees was vicarious based on respondeat superior  was not subject to a verdict or judgment for compensatory damages in excess of the amount of damage determined and found against its defendantemployees the active tortfeasors
D: holding that  3240219b2 merely limits the liability of shortterm lessors the statute reduces responsibility for damages arising from the fault of others but preserves full liability for compensatory damages caused by ones own fault the statute merely caps the amount of damages for the vicarious liability of the lessor
D.