With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in a sale, the text of the listing agreement nevertheless indicates that this is precisely what must happen if Harris is to earn his commission. For starters, the aceeptance-of-an-offer provision is qualified by important language: that Oak Knoll “agrees to pay the AGENT a commission as per this AGREEMENT.” The last four words dictate that we read this provision consistent with the contract as a whole. And indeed, the sale requirement is unambiguously reflected in the contract. Cf. Ramirez, 938 A.2d at 587 (explaining that courts should not “import terms into [an] agreement ... that are not reflected in the contract” (emphasis added)). For example, the listing agreement is titled a “Non-Exclusive Agency Sale Agreement.” Cf. Bialowans v. Minor, 209 Conn. 212, 550 A.2d 637, 639-40 (1988) (<HOLDING>). Similarly, the first sentence of the quoted

A: holding in the context of interpreting contract language that a section heading delimited the scope of language appearing under said heading
B: holding that instructions are sufficient which substantially follow the language of the statute or use equivalent language
C: holding when ordinance language is clear courts must give language its plain meaning
D: holding that when language is exactly the same in two statutory provisions the meaning of that language is also identical
A.