With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that district courts abused their discretion by imposing sex-related supervised release conditions based solely upon conduct that occurred in the distant past. See United States v. Dougan, 684 F.3d 1030, 1033-37 (10th Cir.2012) (vacating sex offender treatment special conditions of release for defendant convicted of robbing a post office because conditions were insufficiently related to defendant’s seventeen-year-old conviction for aggravated battery and thirtythree-yearold conviction for sexual battery); United States v. Rogers, 468 Fed.Appx. 359, 362-63 (4th Cir.2012) (concluding that imposition of sex offender conditions based upon a twenty-three-year-old forcible rape conviction constituted an abuse of discretion); United States v. Sharp, 469 Fed.Appx. 523, 525-26 (9th Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Carter, 463 F.3d 526, 530-32

A: holding that an individual who is required to register as a sex offender is not in custody
B: holding that some of the sex offender conditions imposed on defendant as part of his sentence for possessing a firearm were unreasonable where defendants sole sex offense was over a decade old at the time of sentencing
C: holding evidence was legally insufficient to support conviction for violation of sex offender registration requirement
D: holding some evidence standard applicable to cdoc decision classifying inmate who had not been convicted of a sexual offense as a sex offender
B.