With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 5 F.3d 955, 958 (5th Cir.1993) (comment that plaintiffs supervisor made to plaintiff regarding retirement benefits when plaintiff was terminated, that “Cliff, I hope when I get to your age, somebody does the same thing for me,” proved only that supervisor desired a similar retirement package upon his retirement, and “shed[ ] absolutely no light on the central issue” of “whether Bodenheimer’s age was a factor in [the supervisor’s] decision to terminate him”); Barnes v. Southwest Forest Indus. Inc., 814 F.2d 607, 610-11 (11th Cir.1987) (defendant’s statement to plaintiff that he would have to take another physical examination “and at your age, I don’t believe you could pass it,” was not direct evidence of discrimination). E.E.O.C. v. Texas Instruments, 100 F.3d 1178, 1181 (5th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). . I realize that there is a distinction

A: holding that employees of differing seniority levels were not similarly situated
B: holding that court would not imply a statutory cause of action for employers interference in employees assertion of claim for compensation
C: holding that an employers statement about an employees age making him eligible for retirement simply recognized a fact concerning the employees seniority an observation which did not imply seniority was the reason for discharge
D: holding that a requested reassignment was not reasonable because it would violate the seniority rights of other employees
C.