With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". parties. In Soldal, the police refused to allow the owner of a mobile home to oppose an eviction by the owner of the park where the home was located, even though the police knew the eviction was illegal. The mobile home owner brought a § 1983 action against the park owner and police. The park owner was held by the circuit court to be a state actor based on his conspiracy with the police to illegally evict the mobile home owner. Id. at 58-9, 113 S.Ct. 538. This holding was not disturbed on appeal to the Supreme Court. Id. at 60 n. 6, 113 S.Ct. 538. Here, there is no evidence that Gage knew that Peng was innocent of robbery. The trial court correctly concluded that a finding of concerted .action could not be found on this record. See Howerton v. Gabica, 708 F.2d 380, 385 (9th Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>); accord King v. Massarweh, 782 F.2d 825,

A: holding that private parties may contract to transfer financial responsibilities under cercla
B: holding that a single request that the police perform their peacekeeping responsibilities may be insufficient to create a joint undertaking
C: holding that employees subjective belief that age discrimination occurred is insufficient to create a jury issue
D: holding that inconsistencies in the summary judgment evidence of a single witness create a fact issue
B.