With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". was maritime in nature. Id. at 738, 81 S.Ct. 886. This was true even though the right the seaman gave up may have been “erroneousf ].” Id. In this case, Great Eastern’s right to refuse delivery of the cargo without presentation of the bills of lading is not contested. It is clear from the language of the LOI itself that its purpose was to induce Great Eastern into discharging the cargo without the presentation of the bills of lading. Binani’s “consideration” (Compl. Ex. 2 at 1) on the contract was a promise to pay indemnity; Great Eastern’s consideration was the prompt discharge of the cargo, a quintessentially maritime service, in forbearance of its right to demand the bills of lading on discharge, a quintessentially maritime right. Cf. Norfolk S. Ry., 543 U.S. at 27, 125 S.Ct. 385 (<HOLDING>). Therefore, the LOI was maritime in nature.

A: holding that bills of lading are maritime contracts so long as they require substantial carriage of goods by sea
B: holding that at will contracts of employment are subject to tortious interference with contracts claims
C: holding that the court may not overturn the administrative law judges factual findings as long as they are supported by competent substantial evidence
D: holding that standard noncompete nondisclosure and lease contracts were still maritime contracts because of nature and character and connection to maritime commercial venture
A.