With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to a judgment. Moore et al, supra, ¶ 0.443[4]. See People ex rel. Gallagher v. District Court, 666 P.2d 550 (Colo.1988). The issue must be identical to the issue that was actually and necessarily decided at a prior proceeding. People ex rel. Gallagher, 666 P.2d at 554. Ruth Michaelson’s claim to the corporate assets in the property division arose from the marriage, not from her status as a corporate shareholder. Although Judge Rothenberg described Ruth Michaelson as a “creditor” and referred to Ervin Michaelson’s fiduciary responsibilities to her, those statements are probably better understood as imperfect analogies. In fact, Ruth Michaelson had a claim to the marital assets which was superi- or to that of a creditor. Tinglof v. Askerlund, 96 Colo. 27, 31, 39 P.2d 1039, 1040 (1934) (<HOLDING>); Stokes v. Dollard, 94 Colo. 206, 209, 29 P.2d

A: holding that a wifes interest in property has priority over a general creditor
B: holding jurisdiction over creditor disputes only involves property of estate or resolution affects some other creditor
C: holding that a lender who held a deed of trust had priority over a debtors subsequent judgment creditor
D: holding that specific statutory provisions take priority over general statutory provisions
A.