With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a class action lawsuit based on securities fraud against several individual defendants (collectively “Defendants”) that held various positions in Red-back Networks, Inc. (“Redback”). Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. This Court reviews dismissals for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) de novo. Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.2008). Even assuming Plaintiffs adequately pleaded falsity for their fraudulent statement claim, Plaintiffs have not adequately pleaded loss causation. See Dura Pharms., Inc. v. Broudo, 544 U.S. 336, 347, 125 S.Ct. 1627, 161 L.Ed.2d 577 (2005) (<HOLDING>). Plaintiffs’ allegations that the loss was

A: holding that a claim not pleaded in the petition ie the complaint was not properly before the court on a motion for summary judgment
B: holding that judgment as a matter of law was proper when the plaintiff did not present any evidence that the defendant was motivated by the eeoc complaint knowledge is necessary to establish causation but it is not sufficient
C: holding despite authority for the general proposition that the duty to defend is determined based on the allegations of the complaint that an insurer had no duty to defend where the underlying claim was covered by the policy based on the facts pleaded in complaint but other facts not appearing in the complaint excluded coverage
D: holding loss causation not adequately pleaded when the complaint did not claim that the share price fell significantly after the truth became known
D.