With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the defendant could not be held individually liable under the plaintiffs CFEPA claim pursuant to section 46a-60(a)(1). Id.; see also Cox v. Namnoun, No. 3:95CV37 (AVC), slip op. at 12 (D.Conn. Sept. 26, 1996) (noting that the Connecticut legislature extended liability to “any person” in other sections of CFEPA, but only to an “employer” in section 46a-60(a)(1), and concluding that section 46a-60(a)(1) does not provide for individual supervisory liability). But see Swanson v. Envirotest Sys. Inc., No. 3:98CV751(AHN), 1998 WL 928415, at *3 (D.Conn. Dec. 18, 1998); Armstrong v. Chrysler Fin. Corp., No. 3:97CV1557(AHN), 1998 WL 342045 at *4 (D.Conn. May 14, 1998); Murphy v. Burgess and Norwalk Economic Opportunity, Inc., No. 3:96CV1987(AHN), 1997 WL 529610 at *3-5 (D.Conn. July 16, 1997) (<HOLDING>); Thompson v. Service Merchandise, Inc., No.

A: holding authority to control limits duty to control
B: holding in murphy and declining to reconsider in swanson and armstrong that in light of the differences between the statutory scheme and remedial provisions of cfepa and title vii cfepas discrimination provisions were intended to impose individual liability on supervisors who hold positions of power control and authority and who use that power control and authority to engage in the conduct giving rise to a discrimination claim
C: holding that defendants were not in control and therefore were not supervisors and not subject to liability under  1983
D: holding a defendant is liable as a control person if the defendant had the power to control the general affairs of the entity primarily liable at the time the entity violated the securities laws but declining to decide whether power to control means simply abstract power to control or actual exercise of the power to control internal quotations omitted
B.