With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Sayre whole by holding McGough Construction accountable for Sayre’s otherwise unrecoverable damages to the extent McGough Construction is liable. See Berg v. Jasper Dev. Corp., 1997 WL 177655 (Minn.App.1997) (reducing tort damages award by amounts paid and payable for past and nonspeculative future damages recoverable under the Act), review denied (Minn. May 28,1997). We have attempted to reconcile the limitations imposed by the Act with Sayre’s right as a plaintiff to be fully comp easor settles potential subrogation claims for workers' compensation benefits with the employer and the employer's workers' compensation insurer. See McDonough v. Muska Elec. Co., 486 N.W.2d 768, 771 n. 4 (Minn.1992); see also Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114, 130, 257 N.W.2d 679, 689 (1977) (<HOLDING>). 2 . The parties agree that the statute limits

A: holding that injured employee has right to settle with thirdparty tortfeasor claims not covered by minnesota workers compensation act
B: recognizing the right under federal maritime law to contribution or indemnity from another tortfeasor
C: holding that thirdparty tortfeasor has right to contribution from employer up to amount of employers workers compensation liability
D: recognizing a right to contribution
C.