With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". section.” See Tex, Util. Code § 54.204(d). The Legislature thus expressly afforded the Commission broad authority to enforce Subsection (c), which establishes that an MOU “may not charge any entity ... a pole attachment rate ... that exceeds.the fee [it] would be permitted to charge under rules adopted by the [FCC] under 47 U.S.C. Section 224(e) if [the MOU’s] rates were regulated under federal law and the rules of the FCC.” Id. § 54.204(c). “[W]hen the Legislature expressly confers a power on an agency, it also impliedly intends that the agency have whatever powers are reasonably necessary to fulfill its express duties.” CPS Board I, 53 S.W.3d at 316; see also Texas Bldg. Owners & Managers Ass’n v. Public Util. Comm’n of Tex., 110 S.W.3d 524, 532 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). CPS Energy argues that the power granted by

A: holding that states grant of general corporate powers to hospital authorities does not include permission to use those powers anticompetitively
B: holding that section 502 is an exclusive grant of jurisdiction
C: holding that legislatures giving commission jurisdiction to enforce this section was both grant of express authority and implied grant of powers reasonably necessary to fulfill its duties
D: holding grant of authority to an agency to adopt rules necessary to carry out this chapter clearly vested in the agency authority to interpret a statute
C.