With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Notice of Appeal having been filed thirty-four days after rendition of the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to relocate with the parties’ minor children, we are compelled to dismiss this appeal as untimely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(i) & 9.110(b). The law in Florida is well settled that a motion for rehearing or reconsideration does not toll the time for filing an appeal from a non-final order reviewable pursuant to the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. See Panama City Gen. P’ship v. Godfrey Panama City Inv., LLC, 109 So.3d 291, 292 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (recognizing “a motion for reconsideration of a nonfinal order does not toll the 30-day time limit for appeal”); SC. Read, Inc. v. Seminole Cnty. Sch. Bd., 932 So.2d 1255, 1256-57 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (<HOLDING>); Deal v. Deal, 783 So.2d 319, 321 (Fla. 5th

A: holding a motion for rehearing from an appealable nonfinal order is not authorized and thus does not toll the time for filing an appeal
B: recognizing that an authorized and timely motion for rehearing serves to toll rendition of a final order
C: holding that an unauthorized motion for rehearing does not toll defendants time for filing a notice of appeal
D: holding that a rehearing order was not final or appealable
A.