With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". within the F.M. 407 right-of-way, required the property owner’s consent, and that without that consent, the annexation is void. A general law municipality with a population of 1,000 or less cannot unilaterally annex land; it must either obtain the consent of the property owner, if the land is occupied by less than three qualified voters, or the consent of a majority of qualified voters inhabiting an occupied annexed area. TexLoc.Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 43.024, 43.025, 43.028 (Vernon 1988) (formally Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 974 & 974g); Tex.Loc.Gov’t Code Ann. § 43.033 (Vernon Supp.1994) (permitting general law municipalities having population of over 1,000 to unilaterally annex land provided certain conditions are met); Sitton v. City of Lindale, 455 S.W.2d 939, 940 n. 2, 941 (Tex.1970) (<HOLDING>); City of Kyle v. Price, 547 S.W.2d 376, 377-78

A: holding that municipal ordinance was preempted by frsa and void under supremacy clause
B: holding annexation ordinance only voidable due to procedural irregularities
C: holding annexation ordinance void
D: holding annexation ordinance void where municipality attempted to annex unoccupied territory without owner consent
D.