With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that request is not waived by continuing to make payments. 14 . See also Woods v. Greenpoint Mortg. Funding, Inc., No. 2:09-1810, 2010 WL 1729711, at *4, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41492, at *10 (E.D.Ca. Apr. 27, 2010) ("[T]he failure to hon- or plaintiff's rescission request or request for information is a separate actionable violation of TILA.”); Stewart v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, No. 10-CV-2033, 2011 WL 862938, at *6, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24715, at *17 (N.D.Ill. Mar. 10, 2011) ("A claim for damages for failure to honor rescission is based on § 1635(b) of TILA, which requires a creditor to respond to a notice of rescission within twenty days of receipt.”); Sall v. Bounassissi, No. 10-CV-2245, 2011 WL 2791254, at *8, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75363, at *22-23 (D.Md. July 13, 2011) (<HOLDING>); Abel v. Knickerbocker Realty Co., 846 F.Supp.

A: holding that a claim for damages based on creditors failure to honor a rescission notice is separate and distinct from any claims associated with disclosures at the time of closing
B: holding that plaintiffs claim for loss of consortium is separate and distinct from spouses malpractice claim for purposes of applying insurance policy limitations
C: holding that settlement with one defendant could not be setoff from verdict against second defendant where the claims were separate and distinct ie involving different elements of damages
D: holding that the separate and distinct claims of two or more plaintiffs cannot be aggregated to establish jurisdiction
A.