With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". vague assertion that Stephens was unduly critical of Car ter does not indicate that Kline was mistreated because of her gender. 2. Kline’s Testimony Regarding Workplace Comments Kline testified regarding two inappropriate comments Stephens made, directly to her, and comments she overheard him make to others. Stephens does not dispute that he made two very inappropriate comments directly to Kline. In addition, the sexually charged comments Kline apparently overheard around the office were clearly inappropriate, even if they were not directed at her. While we obviously do not condone such activity, two inappropriate jokes and a few overheard comments which contained sexual innuendo are not severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment. Trujillo, 157 F.3d at 1214 (<HOLDING>) (citation omitted). Our conclusion is further

A: holding that state courts failure to discuss or even to be aware of federal precedent does not in itself render the decision contrary to federal law
B: holding that federal law does not guarantee a utopian workplace or even a pleasant one
C: holding that federal law governs res judicata effect of an earlier federal judgment based on federal law
D: holding that merely alluding to federal law does not raise a federal question
B.