With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1962, Title 11 § 11.15.010. He contends that although he received a sentence of life imprisonment, nevertheless the members of the court-martial were faced with the sole alternative of life imprisonment or death after a determination of guilt. See 10 U.S.C. § 918. Moreover, he says that decisions by the military tribunal were possible by a two-thirds majority of the 11-man court-martial, as opposed to a five-sixths majority being necessary for conviction under State law. See Alaska Statutes Annotated, Title 12 § 12.45.010 and Title 9 § 09.20.100. Appellant claims that he lost the advantages of these and other rights available under State law and federal rights, as stated above. We believe that the views expressed above require rejection of Appellant’s contentions. If , 12 L.Ed. 2d 1041 (<HOLDING>) ; Doughty v. Maxwell, Warden, 376 U.S. 202, 84

A: holding that due process forbids the use of a coerced confession irrespective of its truth as announced in jackson v denno 378 us 368 84 sct 1774 12 led2d 908 to be retroactive
B: holding the right to assistance of counsel as announced in gideon v wainwright 372 us 335 83 sct 792 9 led2d 799 to be retroactive
C: holding that counsel must be appointed to indigents for purposes of appeal as announced in douglas v california 372 us 353 83 sct 814 9 led2d 811 to be retroactive
D: holding that indigents have a right to a transcript on appeal as announced in griffin v illinois 351 us 12 76 sct 585 100 led 891 to be retroactive
A.