With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in the separation of church and state cannot substitute for requirement of injury in fact). Thus even if the crosses offend plaintiffs, that offense is insufficient to entitle them to maintain suit. Notwithstanding the insufficiency of psychological injury, the Supreme Court has held that the required injury need not be severe and need not be economic. An example of a non-economic injury which the Supreme Court has held confers standing is the deprivation of a citizen’s beneficial use of a public park. See United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669, 686, 93 S.Ct. 2405, 2415, 37 L.Ed.2d 254 (1973) (claimed impediment to plaintiffs’ recreational use of natural resources is sufficient to confer standing). The rationale 1088 (D.D.C.1971) (<HOLDING>); rev’d 495 F.2d 65 (D.C.Cir. 1973). Here,

A: holding no violation of federal establishment clause
B: holding that establishment clause claim need not be predicated on coercion
C: holding that rluipa violates establishment clause
D: holding that establishment of christmas day as legal public holiday did not violate establishment clause
A.