With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". light as to undermine confidence in the [second jury’s] verdict.” Kyles, 514 U.S. at 435, 115 S.Ct. at 1566. 5 . We agree with the district court that the state habeas court made a scrivener’s error where, at one point, it appears to endorse a conclusion that Ishman's testimony was material. All of the court’s other findings and conclusions cut against this isolated discrepancy. 6 . The district court expressly refused to decide whether the "troubling facts” surrounding the State’s nondisclosure of Ishman’s correct name and location constituted suppression for Brady purposes. 7 . Additionally, this Court has held that a Fourteenth Amendment violation will not lie “if the defendant, using reasonable diligence, could have obtained the information...." In re Smith, 142 F.3d 1993) (<HOLDING>). 11 . When asked about the materiality of

A: recognizing this rule
B: recognizing this texas rule
C: recognizing this as the general rule
D: recognizing the same rule in texas courts
B.