With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". sovereignty interest, and lawsuit seeking recertification of state property tax assessment was fully as intrusive as retroactive money judgment). The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has likewise declined to extend Coeur d'Alene. See Arnett v. Myers, 281 F.3d 552, 567-68 (6th Cir.2002)(Coeur dAlene does not extend to every case involving state property interest, and state’s interest in regulation of riparian rights does not implicate Coeur dAlene where the suit does not seek to quiet title); Hamilton v. Myers, 281 F.3d 520, 526 (6th Cir.2002)(same). The Sixth Circuit specifically has determined that Coeur d’Alene does not apply to claims for prospective relief brought under federal anti-discrimination laws. Carten v. Kent State Univ., 282 F.3d 391, 397 (6th Cir.2002)(<HOLDING>). In two other decisions, however, the Sixth

A: holding that title ii does not apply to the states
B: holding that title ii of the ada was a valid use of congress power under section 5 of the fourteenth amendment
C: holding that title ii of the ada is not applicable to the federal government
D: holding that coeur dalene does not bar claim for prospective relief under ada title ii citing garrett 121 sct at 968 n 9
D.