With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of review and applicable law Section 37.011 of the Declaratory Judgments Act allows for “[fjurther relief based on a declaratory judgment” upon a showing that the relief is “necessary or proper.” Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 37.011. Ancillary injunctive relief may be obtained when the evidence establishes that a defendant will not comply with a declaratory judgment. Howell v. Tex. Workers’ Comp. Comm’n, 143 S.W.3d 416, 433 (Tex.App.-Austin 2004, pet. denied). The granting or denial of a request for a permanent injunction is within the trial court’s sound discretion, and a reviewing court’s inquiry is limited to the question whether the trial court abused its discretion. See Lakeside Realty, Inc. v. Life Scape Homeowners Ass’n, 202 S.W.3d 186, 190 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2005, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); see also Jim Rutherford Invs., Inc. v.

A: holding that the appropriate standard of review is abuse of discretion
B: holding that abuse of discretion is the proper standard of review for an order denying relief under section 37011
C: holding that the standard of review under rule 60 is abuse of discretion
D: holding that the standard of review for an award of statutory damages is even more deferential than an abuse of discretion standard
B.