With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". title of the Property to Contemporary. The Trustee’s assertion to the contrary is based upon the deed’s recitation that the Property was being conveyed to “CMK Company, a Maryland Corporation,” at a time when there was no such corporation or trade name recorded among the land records. However, it must be remembered that the trade name of “CMK Company” was recorded in the land records on September 29, 1983, 22 days after the deed was executed and 21 years before the petition date. While the failure to record a deed might have resulted in its invalidation during the period between execution and recordation, Maryland courts have not invalidated deeds when such a mistake in corporate formalities is later corrected. See, e.g., Zulver Realty Co. v. Snyder, 191 Md. 374, 379, 62 A.2d 276, 279 (<HOLDING>). In light of the brief period between the

A: holding that mers was not the beneficiary of a deed of trust under the oregon trust deed act absent conveyance to mers of the beneficial right to repayment and that mers could not hold or transfer legal title to the deed as the lenders nominee
B: holding that deed was valid when the deed was conveyed to grantee corporation which formally incorporated after the conveyance
C: holding that sellers agreement to furnish title policy was a separate agreement not superseded by the deed and properly not included in the deed
D: holding that a beneficiary under a deed of trust was entitled to reformation of the grantors deed
B.