With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 916 F.2d 795, 803 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 940, 111 S.Ct. 1397, 113 L.Ed.2d 453 (1991). 4 . The government also presented evidence of Mr. Lazcano-Villalobos' prior arrest in which he hid marijuana in a secret compartment in the rear bumper of his own car, to show his knowledge of the hidden cocaine in the present case. 5 . Levarlo involved an unusually large amount of cocaine — weighing approximately 2,000 pounds — hidden in a U-Haul truck driven by the defendant. See id., 877 F.2d at 1484-86. Thus, Levarlo is limited in its application to situations where, for example, the driver's knowledge is inferred from the unusually large amount of contraband located in the vehicle. See id. at 1486 (relying on United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1076 (4th Cir.1980) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 3018,

A: holding that possession of the equivalent of 279 pounds of marijuana valued at 279000 dollars justified the district courts refusal to provide a lesser included instruction
B: holding no unfair prejudice from admission of conviction for possession of 50 to 200 pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute as evidence of intent to distribute cocaine
C: holding inference of drivers knowledge existed when truckcamper contained over 1100 pounds of marijuana
D: holding that a drivers knowledge that there are concealable weapons in the car available for the drivers use is evidence of possession
C.