With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". signals that she understands that a final judgment has been filed despite the order’s failure to comply with the separate-document rule, she must file an appeal within 30 days of the faulty judgment or lose her ability to appeal altogether. This is a dubious argument. See United States v. Indrelunas, 411 U.S. 216, 221-22, 93 S.Ct. 1562, 36 L.Ed.2d 202 (1973) (per curiam) (although the Government had clearly signaled its understanding that a stipulation for damages was the final judgment, the separate-document provision must be “mechanically applied in order to avoid new uncertainties as to the date on which a judgment is entered” and therefore the Government’s appeal was timely); Gregson & Assocs. Architects v. Gov’t of the Virgin Islands, 675 F.2d 589 (3d Cir.1982) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>); Fed. RApp. P. 4(a) advisory committee notes

A: holding that a notice of appeal is timely when filed before final judgment is entered by the district court
B: holding that appellant had standing to appeal because it was bound by the judgment even though it did not meet the second requirement
C: holding that court had jurisdiction where no separate judgment had been entered even though notice of appeal was not timely filed as measured from the final decision
D: holding appeal was timely although the appellant admitted it had understood a faulty judgment to be final
D.