With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". If a motion for substitution of judge is improperly denied, all subsequent action by the trial judge is void. [Citation.]” (Brim, 241 Ill. App. 3d at 249.) We now hold that the rationale heretofore applied only to motions for automatic substitution of judge (725 ILCS 5/114 — 5(a) (West 1992)), that once a motion for substitution of judge is properly brought a judge loses all power and authority over the cause, applies to motions for substitution of judge for cause (725 ILCS 5/114 — 5(d) (West 1992)). (See Brim, 241 Ill. App. 3d at 249.) We note, however, that there are instances, which are not applicable to the present case, where a trial court need not transfer a motion for substitution of judges for cause to another judge. E.g., People v. Damnitz (1994), 269 Ill. App. 3d 51, 55 (<HOLDING>); People v. Marshall (1988), 165 Ill. App. 3d

A: holding motion for substitution of judge properly denied where movant failed to attach affidavit
B: holding that the fact that a judge had ruled against the defendant is not a basis for finding the judge prejudiced
C: holding that trial judge did not err in refusing to transfer to another judge defendants motion for substitution of judge for cause where defendant failed to establish even a threshold basis for his substitution motion
D: holding that where appellant moved to recuse trial judge from deciding the motion for new trial the judge of the administrative district was required to designate a judge to hear the recusal motion
C.