With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". those amendments are not relevant to the issues presented by this appeal, we cite the current version of section 54.03. 2 . 963 S.W.2d 862, 864. 3 . Id. at 865-66. 4 . 988 S.W.2d 760 (Tex.1999). 5 . See Tex Fam.Code § 54.03(b). 6 . The Family Code provides: (b) At the beginning of the adjudication hearing, the juvenile court judge shall explain to the child and his parent, guardian, or guardian ad litem: (2) the nature and possible consequences of the proceedings, including the law relating to the admissibility of the record of a juvenile court adjudication in a criminal proceeding. Tex. Fam.Code § 54.03(b)(2). 7 . See In re M.A.F., 966 S.W.2d 448, 450 (Tex.1998); C.E.J. v. State, 788 S.W.2d 849, 852 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1990, writ denied). 8 . See Tex. Fam.Cod [1 st Dist.] 1994, no writ) (<HOLDING>); In re L.T., 848 S.W.2d 769, 772

A: holding that only the two statutorily required warnings should be given
B: holding that explanations of arbitration awards are not required
C: holding that harm analysis should not be conducted when none of the explanations required by section 5403b are given
D: holding that harmful error analysis does apply to defects in an explanation required by section 5403b
C.