With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". “a certain transcript of a book Brenner was writing, including handwritten notes,” entitled “Unleash the Warrior Goddess Within.” (Second Am. Compl. ¶¶ 108-12.) In their post-trial submissions, however, Plaintiffs further allege a cause of action for conversion of Pure Power’s confidential business documents, including its client list. To state a claim for conversion under New York law, a plaintiff must show that “someone, intentionally and without authority, assume[d] or exercise[d] control over personal property belonging to someone else, interfering with that person’s right of possession.” Colavito v. N.Y. Organ Donor Network, Inc., 8 N.Y.3d 43, 49-50, 827 N.Y.S.2d 96, 100, 860 N.E.2d 713 (2006); accord Thyroff v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 460 F.3d 400, 403-04 (2d Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). A plaintiff must show: (1) a “possessory

A: holding that electronic records may be subject to a claim for conversion
B: holding that where plaintiff did not allege that it was deprived of or excluded from use of its own customer lists it could not establish conversion
C: holding that where defendant retained possession of and deprived plaintiff access to business records a claim for conversion was properly stated
D: holding that plaintiff could state a claim for conversion of confidential information
C.