With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Nassau Communities Hosp., 54 F.Supp.2d 141, 147 (E.D.N.Y.1998) (dismissing hostile work environment claim where plaintiff's supervisor briefly touched her on two occasions); Salem v. Software Guidance & Assistance, Inc., No. 96 Civ. 8437, 1997 WL 777402, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 1997) (granting summary judgment where plaintiff’s supervisor “made sexually charged remarks, commented on the size of women’s breasts, and at one point touched plaintiff’s rear-end”); Samuels v. New York State Dep’t of Correctional Services, No. 94 Civ. 8645, 1997 WL 253209, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. May 14, 1997) (granting summary judgment where plaintiff complained of a sole incident of being poked in the breast during a fire drill); Gonzalez v. Kahan, No. CV 88-922, 1996 WL 705320, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 25, 1996) (<HOLDING>); Lamar v. Nynex Serv. Co., 891 F.Supp. 184,

A: holding that plaintiffs allegation that her professor gave her a brief bear hug was insufficient to constitute a hostile work environment
B: holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive
C: recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983
D: holding that a plaintiffs psychological distress was not vicarious in a hostile work environment case where she experienced her workplace as hostile by reason of the alleged harassment of other women out of her presence
A.