With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". activity. The writ is granted. The judgment against petitioners is set aside. Traynor, C. J., Peters, J., Mosk, J., Burke, J., and Sullivan, J., concurred. 1 During the pendency of proceedings in this case the court received a certified copy of the certificate evidencing the death of James Caswell on November 18, 1969. Mr. Caswell was the first of the four named petitioners in these proceedings when the court issued an order to show cause on July 16, 1969. Hence the proceedings before this court were originally entitled In re James Caswell et al. on Habeas Corpus. On January 13, 1970, the court dismissed the proceedings with respect to James Caswell as moot. We now entitle the same proceedings In re Thomas Patrick Kay et al. on Habeas Corpus, since Mr. Ed. 267, 71 S.Ct. 325] (<HOLDING>); Terminiello v. Chicago (1947) 337 U.S. 1 [93

A: holding religious meeting in public park without license 20 fine conviction affirmed
B: holding meeting without a permit fine of unstated amount conviction affirmed
C: holding meeting without permit fine of 25 plus costs conviction reversed
D: holding that where juror did not disclose that she had an interest in the conviction of the defendant probable prejudice is shown and the conviction must be reversed
C.