With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". be armed and presently dangerous,” thus enabling them to stop the vehicle in which defendant and Grogan were riding. United States v.. Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1189-90 (6th Cir.1996); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). The officers’ observation of Grogan’s tossing the bag of marijuana after he exited the van justified his pat down. A small quantity of cocaine was also found in his hat. When Mitchell exited the vehicle, he was observed holding a room key to the Executive Inn located next door to Hardee’s. During Mitchell’s pat down, Officer Bernhard Braeuner felt a sharp-edged object in Mitchell’s pants that he recognized to be crack cocaine. This object was obtainable under Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 373, 113 S.Ct. 2130, 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993)(<HOLDING>). The officers had probable cause to arrest

A: holding officers may seize any contraband that a fleeing suspect discards during flight because the suspect has abandoned the property
B: holding that long authorizes protective search of vehicle for weapons during terry stop even when suspect is outside vehicle and effectively under police control
C: holding that police may seize nonthreatening contraband detected by touch during a legitimate terry search
D: holding that contraband would have been inevitably discovered where agents conducted a warrantless search while obtaining a search warrant and later conducted a second legal search in which agents discovered contraband
C.