With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and we were getting it on that basis. Record on Appeal, vol. 38, at 9-171 to 9-172; id. at 9-163 (quoted more extensively supra note 12): Q After Midco entered into this agreement with All Star and Mr. Palma, was there a change in Midco's ability to make sales to the Texas Pipe Bending Co? ****** Q Not to quibble with you, but if you had one sale before, a hundred percent increase would make it two sales. How big an increase was it? A Astronomical. 22 . The district court ordered this restitution pursuant to section 3651 of the Probation Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3651 (1985). While this section has been repealed, the Probation Act which predated the Sentencing Reform Act still applies to offenses committed before November 1, 1987. See United States v. Balboa, 893 F.2d 703, 706 (5th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). 23 . See also United States v. Campbell, 942

A: holding that although probation statute was repealed by sentencing reform act old provision continued to apply to offenses which occurred before effective date of act nov 1 1987
B: holding that as a matter of law offenses that were committed prior to 1 october 1994 the effective date of the structured sentencing act cannot be consolidated for judgment under the act
C: holding that neither the antiterrorism and effective death penalty act of 1996 nor the illegal immigration reform act of 1996 repealed the district courts jurisdiction to review aliens habeas petitions
D: holding retroactive application of the act to prosecution that was pending before the effective date of the act was precluded because the act is prospective
A.