With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court’s decision to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1138 (9th Cir.2012). On this appeal, however, Rossetto takes no issue with any of the district court’s reasons for dismissal. . Instead, she argues for the first time that this court should recognize a Nevada right of action by analogy to an Arizona statute imposing liability on a person who records a false or forged lien or encumbrance against real property. Ariz. Rev Stat. § 33-420. She relies vaguely on In re MERS, 754 F.3d 772, 781-84 (9th Cir.2014), which reversed a judgment dismissing a claim in light of the Arizona Court of Appeals’ interpretation of § 33-420 in Stauffer v. U.S. Bank National Association, 233 Ariz. 22, 308 P.3d 1173, 1178 (Ariz.Ct.App.2013) (<HOLDING>). Although we have discretion to consider

A: holding that a claim for damages exists in an action to enforce title ix
B: holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
C: holding civil action cannot be joined to a criminal appeal
D: holding that an action to clear title of a false or fraudulent document that asserts an interest in real property may be joined with an action for damages under  33420a
D.