With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". omitted). “Unless contrary intent appears,” however, “all statutes, without exception, [should] be construed to apply within the United States .only.” United States v. Delgado-Garcia, 374 F.3d 1337, 1344 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty., — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 2090, 2100, 195 L.Ed.2d 476 (2016) (“Absent clearly expressed congressional intent to the contrary, federal laws will be construed to have only domestic application.”); Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. 108, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 1664, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013) (explaining that the presumption against extraterritorial application provides that ‘“[w]hen a statute has no clear indication of an extraterritorial application, it has none’ ” (quotin 01 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Emmanuel, Crim. No.

A: holding that  924c applies extraterritorially where the predicate acts include crimes on the high seas
B: holding that  924c applies extraterritorially because the predicate crime of violence  violation of the torture act is one that may be prosecuted in a court of the united states 
C: holding that  924c applied to bombings of united states embassies in east africa because the predicate charges under 18 usc  844f1 3 apply extraterritorially
D: holding that  924c applies extraterritorially where the underlying substantive criminal statutes apply extraterritorially
C.