With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". because the mortgagee’s interests were for specific amounts and; its interests would be unaffected by any judgment in the case. Id. The court concluded that, Complete rélief can be accorded between plaintiff and defendant without the presence of the mortgagee... [its] absence will not impair [its] ability to protect [its] interests ... nor will it create any difference in the obligations of the existing parties that may stem from this action that would not otherwise exist. Id. at 538. Here, as in Thompson, Cintron’s interest as mortgagee are that the mortgage debt be paid and that the property not be destroyed. See, e.g., id.; see also Bosteve Ltd., 110 F.R.D. at 260. Those interests are protected regardless of the outcome of the partition action. Bosteve Ltd., 110 F.R.D. at 260 (<HOLDING>). In this case, the parties’ obligation under

A: holding prejudgment interest is to be determined on the entire amount of compensatory damages and then reduced by the amount of interest which would have accrued at present value on the settlement amount determined before trial
B: holding that mortgagees interest in an action for a mortgaged yacht was unaffected by judgment where its interest was the specific amount of the loan
C: holding that where payment toward judgment was for less than the total amount of principal and interest  owed that payment then did not terminate the accrual of interest on the remaining principal
D: holding that a claim for interest on a money judgment did not accrue until the judgment was rendered which was the date on which the trial court issued its order
B.