With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to 35-215 (Cum. Supp. 1982), the firefighter pension statutes as they existed prior to January 1, 1984. Those statutes provided for firefighters’ retirement before the current law. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 35-201(5) (Cum. Supp. 1982) stated: “[S]alary shall mean the base rate of pay, excluding overtime, callback pay, clothing allowances, and other such benefits,” and thus, salary was defined the same under the old law as it is under the new. In Hill v. City of Lincoln, 213 Neb. 517, 330 N.W.2d 471 (1983), the Nebraska Supreme Court found that the words “salary” and “regular pay” are not ambiguous words. It found 757 (Minn. App. 1989); Smerek v. Christiansen, 111 Misc. 2d 580, 444 N.Y.S.2d 860 (1981); York Paid Firemens Pension Fund Bd. v. Orendorff, 53 Pa. Commw. 629, 419 A.2d 232 (1980) (<HOLDING>). In none of the cases reviewed has a court

A: holding that salary is unconstitutionally withheld if on the basis of protected activities
B: holding that if a fireman contributed to a pension fund on the basis of his salary plus longevity payments he would be entitled to pension payments computed on the same basis
C: recognizing that payments to secured creditors are only required in equal monthly amounts if property to be distributed  is in the form of periodic payments
D: holding that pslra barred rico claims based on pension fund scheme involving failure to disclose conflicts of interest and commission arrangements
B.