With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". warrant was for failure to abide by conditions of release. Defendant was arrested on that warrant; he was not arrested for failure to appear. Defendant argues that there is no provision in the rule for failure to return from a furlough and that failure to appear under Rule 5-604(B)(5) occurs only when a defendant fails to appear before a judicial officer at a scheduled hearing.. {24} The criminal Failure to Appear statute has just such a provision, and Defendant contends that the statute “connects” to the rule. Section 31-3-9 makes it a crime to “willfully fail[ ] to appear before any court or judicial officer” when that person is “released pending any proceeding related to the prosecution or appeal of a criminal offense.” Id.; see Hicks, 2002-NMCA-038, ¶ 15, 132 N.M. 68, 43 P.3d 1078 (<HOLDING>). Indeed, no conviction has been sustained

A: holding a person who is not a member of the bar of any court  may appear pro se but is not qualified to appear in the district court or in this court as counsel for others
B: holding that the failure to appear in court pursuant to a court order can constitute direct criminal contempt
C: holding that criminal faffing to appear requires not coming to court as directed by a notice subpoena summons or other legal process
D: holding that the term timely should be read in conjunction with 45c2b that requires a party subject to a subpoena to object to a subpoena duces tecum within 14 days of service of the subpoena
C.