With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". there are no allegations of wrongdoing for which John Doe 2 could be considered liable. Additionally, plaintiffs conelusory allegations that this “medical entity” failed in its supervisory responsibilities, with no facts to support this claim, are insufficient to state a claim against John Doe 2. Accordingly, plaintiffs claims against defendant John Doe 2, Employer/Agent for medical staff at Upstate C.F., will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 17.Forced Medication The Fourteenth Amendment protects the right of a competent-person to refuse unwanted medical treatment. See, e.g., Cruzan v. Director, Mo. Dep’t of Health, 497 U.S. 261, 278, 110 S.Ct. 2841, 111 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990) (<HOLDING>). The Second Circuit has held, moreover, that

A: recognizing the principle that a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment
B: recognizing principle
C: holding that under article i section 9 a person has no constitutionally protected privacy interest in abandoned property
D: recognizing a competent persons constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing lifesaving medical intervention
A.