With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". State fearing that the clerical error would be corrected if he did not. A defendant’s right to cross-examine a witness concerning possible biases, prejudices, or ulterior motives is protected by both the federal and state constitutions. People v. Ramey, 152 Ill. 2d 41, 67, 604 N.E.2d 275 (1992); U.S. Const., amends. VI, XIV; Ill. Const., 1970, art. I, § 8; Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 39 L. Ed. 2d 347, 94 S. Ct. 1105 (1974). The exposure of “a witness’ motivation in testifying is a proper and important , function of the constitutionally protected right of the cross-examination. The widest latitude should be given the defense on cross-examination when trying to establish a witness’ bias or motive.” Ramey, 152 Ill. 2d at 67; People v. Furby, 228 Ill. App. 3d 1, 4, 591 N.E.2d 533 (1992) (<HOLDING>). It is also well established that a witness’

A: holding that the constitutional right to crossexamination must be satisfied first before the court can exercise its discretion in limiting the scope or extent of crossexamination
B: holding that court did not prejudice defendant by limiting his counsel to preestablished limitations on inter alia the scope of crossexamination
C: recognizing that criminal defendants right to testify is subject to crossexamination
D: holding that limitation on scope and breadth of crossexamination did not significantly curtail effectiveness of witness crossexamination because crossexamination was lengthy and extensive
A.