With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 408 F.3d 301, 305 (6th Cir.2005) (reaffirming that “we as an appellate court must still have the articulation of the reasons the district court reached the sentence ultimately imposed.”) Later in United States v. Williams, 436 F.3d 706 (6th Cir.2006), we considered what weight should be given the appropriate advisory guideline range when considering whether a sentence is reasonable. Despite the fact that under Section 3553(a) the advisory guidelines are but one of many sentencing factors to be considered, and without a reasoned explanation, the Williams panel “join[ed] several sister circuits in crediting sentences properly calculated under the Guidelines with a rebutta-ble presumption of reasonableness.” Id. at 708; See United States, v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Lincoln, 413 F.3d 716, 717

A: recognizing that this court applies an appellate presumption of reasonableness to a withinguidelines sentence
B: recognizing this presumption
C: holding that we may apply a presumption of reasonableness to a sentence within the guidelines range
D: recognizing a presumption of reasonableness
D.