With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Onee established, the burden then shifts to the nonmovant to respond with specifically designated facts that establish the existence of a genuine issue for trial. Id, On review, we may not search the entire record to support the judgment, but may only consider that evidence which was specifically designated to the trial court. A presumption of validity clothes a trial court's grant of summary judgment, and the appellant has the burden of demonstrating to this Court that the , 342 N.E.2d 619 (Ind.1976) (extending a builder's implied warranty of habitability to a subsequent purchaser, limiting lability to latent de-feets not discoverable by a subsequent purchaser's reasonable inspection of the premises before the sale); Theis v. Heuer, 264 Ind. 1, 280 N.E.2d 300 (Ind.1972) (<HOLDING>). Although an implied warranty of habitability

A: holding that purchaser could rescind contract where seller failed to disclose a fact  the flooding of the subject real estate  that seller knew purchaser would regard as material
B: holding that subsequent to a judicial sale the report of the sale must be made to and ratified by the court before a deed for the property is given by the trustee to the purchaser
C: holding the sale valid as between the original parties despite noncompliance with the act
D: holding that the rule of caveat emptor is no longer valid with regard to the sale of a new residence by the buildervendor to the immediate purchaser
D.