With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". documents on the floor near the night stand. (See Hr’g, Gov. Ex. 27 ¶ 6.) The documents included identification cards, social security cards, and blank checks, none of which were in Nishimura’s or Defendant’s names, scattered among six open white envelopes. (Id.) Special Agent Tuan Payton stated that the loose documents were in plain view, and their incriminating character was immediately apparent, as they consisted of sensitive, private, and valuable documents in the names of people other than Defendant or Nishimura. (Id.; see also Hrg, Gov. Exs. 19-25.) The Court finds that Special Agent Pay-ton had probable cause to believe that the documents were associated with criminal activity such as fraud or identity theft. See United States v. Giannetta, 909 F.2d 571, 579 (1st Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Caymen, 404 F.3d

A: holding that visible contraband in plain view within the apartment provided probable cause for an arrest of person found therein
B: holding that eyewitness accounts and an officers observations established probable cause
C: holding that the seizure of a notebook containing names numbers and figures during the execution of a warrant for marijuana was justified by the plain view exception in light of the officers knowledge that drug dealers customarily kept records of their drug dealings
D: holding that an envelope found in a bedroom containing blank birth certificates blank identification cards checks for accounts held in different names and bank statements for accounts held in different names supported probable cause justifying a plain view seizure of the documents
D.