With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". F.3d 1388, 1397 (5th Cir.1994); Judwin Properties, Inc. v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co., 973 F.2d 432, 436 (5th Cir.1992); Resolution Trust Corporation v. Camp, 965 F.2d 25, 28 (5th Cir.1992); Scott v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections, 961 F.2d 77, 79 n. 5 (5th Cir.1992); NL Industries, Inc. v. GHR Energy Corp., 940 F.2d 957, 965 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1032, 112 S.Ct. ,873, 116 L.Ed.2d 778 (1992); and .3d at 1179-80; Fraire v. City of Arlington, 957 F.2d 1268, 1273 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 973, 113 S.Ct. 462, 121 L.Ed.2d 371 (1992); and Hanks v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., 953 F.2d 996, 997 (5th Cir.1992). "Material facts” are facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U 5th Cir.1977), (<HOLDING>). See also E.E.O.C. v. Brown & Root, Inc., 688

A: holding that evidence in an inadmissible form may be considered at the summary judgment stage as long as the evidence is submitted in an admissible form at trial
B: holding that a written report drafted by a person who is not properly qualified as an expert may not be considered as summary judgment evidence
C: holding expert report requirement fulfilled in claim against nurse by providing expert report of nurse as to standard of care and expert report of medical doctor as to causation
D: holding that a nonhearsay response to an interrogatory that is based on personal knowledge may be considered as evidence on summary judgment
B.