With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". section 1-14-3 of title 68 of the Indiana Administrative' Code reads as follows: (a) The [ISP] shall, through interdepartmental bill, assess the costs listed in section 2 of this rule to the [IGC]. The [IGC] will reimburse the [ISP] for the amount assessed. (b) The [IGC] will prepare an invoice that will be sent to the riverboat licensee or riverboat license applicant. The riverboat licensee or riverboat license applicant will pay the [IGC] in the manner directed in the invoice. Thus, the ISP officers assigned to Aztar are separated from Aztar by two governmental agencies, the ISP and IGC. The fact that the troopers are two levels removed from Aztar weighs against a finding that Trooper McCarthy was an employee or agent of Aztar. See GKN Co. v. Magness, 744 N.E.2d 397, 405 (Ind.2001) (<HOLDING>). C.Belief of the Parties Fioretti has supplied

A: holding that plaintiff could recover medical fees not actually paid by the insurance company pursuant to an insurance contract
B: holding in part that the liability insurance company of the subcontractor which had named the general contractor as an additional insured on the subcontractors policy was liable to reimburse the general contractor for a settlement payment the general contractor had made to the subcontractors employee
C: holding that the employer created an erisa plan when it 1 paid for the employees insurance 2 contracted with the insurance company for coverage and eligibility requirements and 3 collected and remitted the employees dependents premiums
D: holding that fact that trucking company paid plaintiff withheld his taxes and paid his workers compensation insurance premiums pointed to the conclusion that plaintiff was employee of trucking company and not of general contractor even though general contractor paid trucking company for work that was solely performed by plaintiff
D.