With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Holdings, Inc., 219 S.W.3d 563, 583 (Tex.App.-Austin 2007, pet. denied). We accord a trial court’s findings of fact the same force and dignity as a jury’s verdict. Anderson v. City of Seven Points, 806 S.W.2d 791, 794 (Tex.1991). Such determinations are reviewable for legal and factual sufficiency. Id. “An oral statement is defamatory per se only if it falls within one of the following categories: (1) imputation of a crime; (2) imputation of a loathsome disease; (3) injury to a person’s office, business, profession, or calling; or (4) imputation of sexual misconduct.” Downing v. Bums, 348 S.W.3d 415, 424 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.). “[A]n allegedly nity from liability is not jurisdictional. See Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 224; Harris County Hosp. Disk, 283 S.W.3d at 842 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, it was not an issue that this

A: holding that qualified immunity is not merely immunity from damages but also immunity from suit
B: holding governmental immunity is no defense to contractual liability
C: recognizing that under texas law governmental immunity embraces two principles immunity from liability and immunity from suit
D: holding immunity from liability is not jurisdictional
D.