With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". because the weapons at issue in the Rulings were classified as maehineguns based on the ATF’s determination that they were “designed to shoot” automatically. 2. Available Evidence In support of its motion, the Government submitted a Firearms Technology Branch Report of Technical Examination (“FTB Report”) written by ATF Officer Richard Vasquez after his investigation of the Defendant weapon that detailed its characteristics and the methods used to restore it to automatic shooting capacity. The Claimant objects to the admissibility of the FTB Report, as it was unsworn and not accompanied by an affidavit. See Dole v. Elliott Travel & Tours, Inc., 942 F.2d 962, 968-69 (6th Cir.1991) (citing Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 158 n. 17, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970)) (<HOLDING>). We need not resolve this dispute, however, as

A: holding that unsworn statements signed under penalty of peijury can be used to oppose a motion for summary judgment
B: holding that unsworn statements may not be considered on a motion for summary judgment
C: holding that an unsworn letter is not proper summary judgment proof
D: holding that a signed but unsworn letter which is not otherwise authenticated is hearsay and should not be considered as evidence in opposition to a motion for summary judgment
B.