With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Cir.2003) (applying the state-created danger theory where decedent shot himself during a police standoff). As both these suicide cases demonstrate, however, we do not strictly require third-party violence as a precondition to invoking the state-created danger theory, but rather only pri 009) (recognizing that without an underlying constitutional violation, a § 1983 claim for failure to supervise "necessarily fails”); see also Currier v. Doran, 242 F.3d 905, 922-23 (10th Cir.2001) (relying on Sutton to uphold a claim for failure to supervise against a child welfare supervisor as part of a complaint that also adequately alleged an underlying constitutional violation against subordinate social workers based on danger creation); cf. Martinez v. Beggs, 563 F.3d 1082, 1092 (10th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>). We believe Sutton recognized the requirement

A: holding that a municipality may not be held liable under section 1983 under a theory of respondeat superi or but may be liable for policies or customs that violate an employees constitutional rights
B: holding that a city may not be held liable under  1983 where there was no underlying constitutional violation by any of its officers
C: holding a sheriff could not be liable for implementing county policies where no underlying violation of decedents rights had occurred
D: holding supervisory liability existed where sheriff failed to establish policies regarding accurate identification of suspects and where sheriff knew of prior instances of mistaken identity
C.