With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". due to fibomyalgia”, indicating he was unsure about his opinion. The ALJ properly found that Dr. Choudhury’s limitations were inconsistent with the evidence of record. (Tr. 19). Dr. Clark notes show that April 2006 through August 2006, Plaintiff showed positive fibomyalgia trigger points. However, he also noted that there were no deformities or synovitis over the joints, Plaintiff joints had full range of motion. Further, he noted that Plaintiffs motor strength was intact throughout and there was equal and symmetric deep tendon reflexes. (Tr. 19, 421, 423, 682). The ALJ properly found that Dr. Clark’s limitations were inconsistent with the evidence of record. (Tr. 19). Dr. Rabinowitz’s notes show that he was unable to test the Plaintiffs gait because of her dependence on assistance (<HOLDING>) and a quad' cane when ambulating. Further,

A: holding that a hotel guest has a legitimate expectation of privacy in his room during the period of time for which the room is rented
B: holding that under buie the second room in a tworoom apartment immediately adjoined the first room in which the suspect was arrested
C: holding that a visitor to a hotel room for purposes of distributing drugs failed to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in the room
D: holding on to objects in the room
D.