With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 6 See OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4) (authorizing the State, in criminal cases, to appeal “[f]rom an order, decision, or judgment suppressing or excluding evidence illegally seized or excluding the results of any test for alcohol or drugs in the case of motions made and ruled upon prior to the impaneling of a jury or the defendant being put in jeopardy, whichever occurs first”). 7 Ewumi v. State, 315 Ga. App. 656, 657 (1) (727 SE2d 257) (2012) (punctuation omit e was insufficient probable cause for a DUI arrest when the only evidence offered was that the arresting officer smelled alcohol on the driver’s breath, a breath test revealed the presence of alcohol, and the defendant admitted to drinking alcohol “earlier in the day”); Ojemuyiwa v. State, 285 Ga. App. 617, 620 (2) (647 SE2d 598) (2007) (<HOLDING>); Sanders, 274 Ga. App. at 394-98 (affirming

A: holding that there was probable cause to arrest defendant for dui where among other factors the officer observed defendant driving erratically and defendants eyes were glassy
B: holding that there was insufficient probable cause for a dui arrest when inter alia although the defendants eyes were bloodshot and watery there was no evidence that her eyes were glassy or unfocused
C: holding that although two officers detected a strong odor of alcohol coming from the defendants person that fact did not support an arrest for dui when there was no evidence presented whatsoever as to the defendants manner of driving that her speech was slurred her gait unsteady or her eyes red and glassy
D: holding that there was sufficient probable cause for the defendants dui arrest when the evidence showed that the officer smelled the odor of alcohol on the defendants breath the defendants eyes were bloodshot and watery and his breath test was positive for alcohol
C.