With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a valid cooperation agreement for Kozak, no cooperation agreement exists here for the court to enforce. Therefore, the court denies defendant Ko-zak’s motion to dismiss. While this conclusion makes further analysis unnecessary, the court will nevertheless examine the question of whether a cooperation agreement reached with state ac 554 (9th Cir.1995) (“[I]t is well settled that states cannot bind the federal government to the terms of a plea agreement to which the federal government is not a party.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 113, 136 L.Ed.2d 65 (1996); United States v. Allen, 930 F.2d 1270, 1274 (7th Cir.1991) (“In general, the federal government is not bound by a plea agreement entered into in state proceedings.”); United States v. Roberson, 872 F.2d 597, 611 (5th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Long, 852 F.2d 975, 978 (7th

A: holding that state immunity agreement did not bind federal prosecutor
B: holding that state defendant waived eleventh amendment immunity to a federal claim by removing to federal court
C: holding that state could not assert sovereign immunity defense where the state had waived immunity in state court and agreed to remove suit to federal court
D: holding that the rule 12b6 ruling was not a final judgment and did not bind the district court at summary judgment
A.