With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”); see also Ga. Const, art. 1, § 1, ¶ XIII (“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue except upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation particularly describing the place or places to be searched and the person or things to be seized.”). 6 State v. Palmer, 285 Ga. 75, 77 (673 SE2d 237) (2009); see also OCGA § 17-5-21 (a). 7 Palmer, 285 Ga. at 77 (p (626 SE2d 592) (2006) (<HOLDING>); Perkins v. State, 220 Ga. App. 524, 525 (1)

A: holding that the judge issuing the search warrant plainly had a substantial basis for determining that there was probable cause to issue the warrant for the search of a residence when inter alia a reliable cl went to the residence knocked on the door entered and then made a controlled purchase of what appeared to be heroin
B: holding that it is permissible under the fourth amendment to detain occupants of a residence while executing a search warrant of the residence
C: holding that a warrant authorizing the search of a residence vehicles at the residence and all persons found in the residence was not overly broad given that search was limited to places were drugs or weapons might be found
D: holding that a controlled buy at a particular home provided probable cause for the search of that residence
A.