With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Id. at para. 171. This is clearly the case here. The international community, including the United States, severely condemned the Serbian military actions in the Balkan republics and the strategy of genocide that went with it. Vujisic refused to participate, and contrary to the government counsel’s insistence at oral argument, Vu-jisic’s desertion from and persecution by a military force condemned by the international community can rightly be considered to be caused by his opposition to the political and nationalistic policies of the Yugoslav government. Furthermore, because of his refusal, his family and in particular his father was subjected to arrest and punishment, making Radisav’s fear of future persecution well founded. Cf. Najafi v. INS, 104 F.3d 943, 947 (7th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); Mgoian v. INS, 184 F.3d 1029, 1036-37 (9th

A: holding that documentary evidence pertaining to the asylum applicant himself and to the events in which he was involved  can independently establish facts essential to  an asylum claim
B: holding that to establish asylum eligibility based on future persecution an applicant must show that he or she subjectively fears persecution and that this fear is objectively reasonable
C: holding that an alien cannot claim asylum based on persecution that is personally motivated
D: holding that asylum seeker failed to establish well founded fear of persecution based on oppression of asylum seekers family unrelated to asylum seekers actions
D.