With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". arose to have less than 2 years from the date of injury to file suit. This precise fact pattern ap previously interpreted 60-515 to be a tolling statute. See Biritz, 262 Kan. at 774; Gifford v. Saunders, 207 Kan. 360, 363, 485 P.2d 195 (1971). In Biritz, this court stated that K.S.A. 60-515 was intended “to mitigate the difficulties of preparing and maintaining a civil suit while the plaintiff is under a legal disability,” and it “creates an alternative, but specific limitations period for persons under a legal disability.” 262 Kan. at 774. Kansas appellate courts have uniformly applied 60-515 to extend the statute of limitations for those under a legal disability. See Biritz, 262 Kan. at 776; Lewis v. Shuck, 5 Kan. App. 2d 649, 652, 623 P.2d 520, rev. denied 229 Kan. 670 (1981) (<HOLDING>); Frost v. Hardin, 1 Kan. App. 2d 464, 471, 571

A: holding that a timely petition for administrative review stops the running of the statute of limitations
B: holding that the concealment of ones identity does not toll the running of the statute of limitations
C: holding that tolling provisions of 60515 apply only if the disability occurs during the running of the statute of limitations under 60513
D: holding that appointment of guardian over incompetent adult does not remove legal disability so as to halt tolling and commence running of statute of limitations
C.