With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in the federal motor carrier requirements, the trip lease, or the imputed ICC endorsement to [the lessee’s] insurance policy would alter any party’s rights or duties of contribution. In particular, we make clear that those provisions do not impose on [ICC carrier], as lessee, the status of an insurer with respect to ... the lessor. (Emphasis supplied.) Id. at 143. Cf. Occidental Fire and Cas. Co. of N.C. v. Brocious, 772 F.2d 47, 52 (3d Cir.1985), (reaffirming the holding that the same federal requirements applicable here do not absolve lessors of otherwise existing obligations under contracts allocating financial risk among themselves as private parties); Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. Brada Miller Freight Systems, Inc., et al, 423 U.S. 28, 96 S.Ct. 229, 46 L.Ed.2d 169 (1975), (<HOLDING>) See also Pratt v. Andrews, 164 Ill.App.3d 606,

A: holding that probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances known to the police officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the accused had committed or was committing an offense in situations where the arresting officer has not observed the operation of the vehicle such facts and circumstances would necessarily have to include a relationship between the time there was evidence to show the influence of intoxicants and the time of operation of the vehicle internal citations omitted
B: holding that an indemnification agreement between a lessor and an icc carrierlessee shifting liability to the lessor did not contravene the icc regulations which makes the lessee ultimately responsible for the operation of the vehicle
C: holding that the indemnification contract between an owner of train tracks and an owner and operator of a train clearly and unequivocally required indemnification for the track owners negligence given that the contract explicitly stated that the indemnification provisions shall apply regardless of considerations of fault or negligence
D: holding that  3240219b2 merely limits the liability of shortterm lessors the statute reduces responsibility for damages arising from the fault of others but preserves full liability for compensatory damages caused by ones own fault the statute merely caps the amount of damages for the vicarious liability of the lessor
B.