With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". testimony of the government’s witnesses. Unless the district court is given an opportunity to correct the error, an appellate court cannot review evidence presented at trial which casts doubt upon a pre-trial suppression motion. See United States v. Longmire, 761 F.2d 411, 420-21 (7th Cir.1985). Thomas next contends that the prosecutor misrepresented the testimony of two government witnesses and, in his closing statement, the prosecutor said that Thomas ran a "satellite office" for the E & Lite conspiracy. Because five witnesses, including one police officer, testified that Thomas sold E & Lite heroin at the Travelers' Motel as a subordinate of E. Gaston, the prosecutor did not misrepresent the trial record as a whole. See United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099, 105 S.Ct. 2322,

A: holding that a plain error that is fatal to a conviction is sufficient to warrant reversal
B: holding that prosecutorial error does not warrant reversal unless substantial prejudice results
C: holding that even if evidence admitted in error admission must result in material prejudice to warrant reversal
D: holding to warrant reversal the appellant must show both the error of the ruling and resulting prejudice
B.