With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". announced 78 years later that juveniles have a constitutional right to counsel; we merely note that it remains the duty of a parent in the first instance to pay for such necessaries.” H.V., 252 S.W.3d at 327 n. 55 (citations omitted). 4 . The majority correctly observes that the Hardin Court did cite to Section 154.001, but this citation followed the familiar maxim that "parents have a legal duty to support their children." For its ultimate holding — the rule that is the focus of today's en banc decision— the only direct citation from the Hardin Court is to Roosth v. Roosth, a decision that never reached the merits of how a judgment for attorney’s fees may be enforced. See Hardin, 161 S.W.3d at 25; Roosth v. Roosth, 889 S.W.2d 445, 456 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (<HOLDING>). 5 . In Wagner, we denied the relator's writ

A: holding attorneys testimony on all work performed sufficient to support attorneys fees award even though no time records presented
B: holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees
C: holding trial court had no authority to award attorneys fees when arbitrator had stated he would not award attorneys fees
D: holding that a public administrator was not entitled to attorneys fees in a claim against the estate of a former guardian where the case was not one where attorneys fees were authorized and there was no evidence to support the award
B.