With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the discovery rule, the statute of limitations is tolled until an injured party discovers or reasonably should discover, (1) that she has been injured and (2) that her injury has been caused by another party’s conduct). While knowledge of the cause of injury is pertinent to determining the date on which the statute of limitations begins to run, it has no special relevance to determining the date an insurance policy is triggered, unless specifically required by the language of the applicable policy of insurance. Compare Wilson, 964 A.2d at 362 n. 3 (explaining that tolling the statute of limitations until the cause of injury is reasonably discoverable is necessary to protect the litigation rights of persons who suffer latent injuries) with Kvaerner Metals Div., 908 A.2d at 897 (<HOLDING>). Here, the language of the Penn National

A: holding that in interpreting a contract the actual purpose and intent of the parties must be derived
B: holding that under georgia law a holder of a master insurance policy is an agent of the insurance company and not the insurer
C: recognizing that in interpreting a statute our primary purpose is to ascertain the intent of the legislature
D: holding that the primary goal when interpreting an insurance contract is to ascertain the intent of the parties as manifested by the language of the specific insurance policy
D.