With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (11th Cir.2003). This Court’s CRO Order, being a final decision of a significant and discrete contested matter (i.e., a dispute over the authority and procedure for a debtor in possession to engage a CRO with sole authority to manage the debtor in possession, culminating in this Court’s appointment of Steven S. Oscher as CRO of the Debtors over the U.S. Trustee’s objection), is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. While there is no decision within the Eleventh Circuit holding that a bankruptcy court’s order approving or authorizing a debtor in possession to engage a CRO constitutes a final order, this situation is analogous to an order appointing a Chapter 11 trustee. Cf. Walden v. Walker (In re Walker), 515 F.3d 1204, 1210-1211 (11th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). Not unlike an appeal from an order appointing

A: holding that a bankruptcy court order appointing a chapter 11 trustee constitutes a final order appealable to the eleventh circuit court of appeals
B: holding that a rehearing order was not final or appealable
C: holding adjudication order based upon a determination on the merits in juvenile court is a final and appealable order
D: holding that a bankruptcy order is not final unless it 1
A.