With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". it was so out of whack, it was repaid in conformance with the business that conducts — I mean, it’s not something you see every day, but it was paid in conformance with the business that conducts a massive fraud and has lots and lots of victims, including Apple Fund. Transcript 2 at 163-165. This court notes that the exception to preference liability applies to payments made by a legitimate business, not payments made by a fraudulent business. The measure of business conduct for purposes of this defense should be limited to the legitimate practices of legitimate businesses. This court declines to apply the Defendants’ reasoning; ordinary businesses do not pay fictitious profits or systematically defraud their customers or their lenders. See, e.g., M & L Bus. Mach. Co., 84 F.3d at 1340 (<HOLDING>). This court finds that Apple Fund’s collection

A: holding statute of limitations for discriminatory pay practices begins when initial pay decision was made
B: holding that ordinary businesses do not pay fictitious profits
C: holding state wrongful refusal to pay claim barred by exclusivity and penalty provisions of lhwca and distinguishing martin from cases of ordinary refusals to pay
D: holding that suspension with pay was not adverse employment action
B.