With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 796 F.2d 249, 251 (9th Cir.1986). Second, “[d]ue process challenges to deportation proceedings require a showing of prejudice to succeed.” Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS, 282 F.3d at 1226. and replace with We have also held that “[d]ue process challenges to deportation proceedings require a showing of prejudice to succeed.” Rodriguez-Lariz, 282 F.3d at 1226. 2. Op. at 1035 n. 6: Delete footnote in its entirety. 3. Op. at 1035, line 2 of Section III.B: Delete “fell outside the range of professional competence.” and replace with “constituted . 2052). and replace with Counsel’s unreasonable failure to investigate and present the factual and legal basis of Lin’s asylum claim would itself amount to ineffective assistance of counsel. Cf. Escobar-Grijalva v. INS, 206 F.3d 1331, 1335 (9th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>), amended on other grounds by 213 F.3d 1221

A: recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel
B: holding that the sixth amendment right to counsel embodies the right to effective assistance of counsel
C: holding that attorney who was unprepared to argue and unknowledgeable about the facts of an asylum case could not have provided effective assistance of counsel
D: holding a criminal defendant has the right to effective assistance of counsel during a plea process
C.