With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Davis v. State, 737 So.2d 480, 483 (Ala.1999) (“The State is no longer required to prove that the defendant broke and entered the premises. Instead, the strictures of that element have been replaced with the general requirement of a trespass on premises through an unlawful entry or an unlawful remaining.”). Moreover, the red notice on the door did not affect the unlawfulness of Sanders’s entry because he testified that he did not see the notice. When asked if he thought that the building had been condemned, Sanders testified, “That sign was not on the door at the time.” (R. 65.) The house owned by Turner and used to store some of his belongings constituted a building under § 13A-7-7, Ala.Code 1975. Compare Sanders v. State, [Ms. CR-10-1091, December 14, 2012] — So.3d (Ala.Crim.App.2012)(<HOLDING>). In Sanders, the structure was not used for

A: holding that the structure purchased solely for demolition by the birmingham airport authority did not constitute a building for the purpose of thirddegree burglary
B: holding that burglary of commercial building is crime of violence under guidelines
C: holding that thirddegree burglary is a violent felony
D: holding a burglary must be of a building or structure in order to qualify as a violent felony for acca purposes
A.