With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in deten mining whether a reasonable person would consider the conditions intolerable. Turner, 7 Cal.4th at 1254, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 223, 876 P.2d 1022; see also Mullins, 15 Cal.4th at 740, 63 Cal.Rptr.2d 636, 936 P.2d 1246 (noting that “the longer the employee delays ... resignation, the more difficult it may be to prove” intolerability). Intolerability is typically reserved for the jury, Huskey v. City of San Jose, 204 F.3d 893, 900 (9th Cir.2000), which can consider “all of the circumstances of the employment relationship.” Thompson v. Tracor Flight Sys., Inc., 86 Cal.App.4th 1156, 1169 n. 1, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 95 (2001). Still, we can in certain circumstances conclude as a matter of law that conditions were not sufficiently severe to warrant resignation. See, e.g., Huskey, 204 F.3d at 901 (<HOLDING>); Turner, 7 Cal.4th at 1255, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d

A: holding insureds claim against insurance agent for negligent misrepresentation not preempted by erisa agent told insured he would be covered for workrelated injuries when he in fact was not
B: holding that plaintiff had standing to challenge constitutionality of a georgia criminal trespass law because he was warned twice to stop handbilling and was told that if he engaged in the activity again he would be arrested
C: holding that an employee might be entitled to overtime where he was told that he would not be paid overtime but was not told to limit his hours
D: holding city attorney faded to state claim  he was told he would be referred to counseling assigned undesirable cases and given the cold shoulder by colleagues
D.