With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". freedom to take advantage of other employment opportunities.” Id. at 578, 92 S.Ct. 2701. Plaintiff argues that a general or dishonorable discharge reflecting lack of fitness for military service triggers such a stigma. The government argues no such stigma has yet occurred. The parties dispute what form of discharge is likely in the case of Major Witt. The government argues that an honorable discharge is most likely. The Court’s own research suggests that 82% of all discharges under DADT have been honorable. Certainly, the distinction of Major Witt’s career would support an honorable discharge. Involuntary separation from military service with an honorable discharge, absent something more, does not infringe upon a constitutionally protected liberty interest. See Sims, 505 F.2d at 862-63 (<HOLDING>); benShalom, 489 F.Supp. at 971-972; Diliberti

A: holding that liberty interests that are protected by procedural due process are generally limited to freedom from restraint
B: holding that liberty interests are involved only when separation from the military is carried out in such a fashion as to stigmatize the separated member typically this would be a dishonorable discharge
C: holding that the due process clause protects only those liberty interests created by the state
D: holding that because the legislature had set up no machinery by which taxation of leasehold interests in public property could be carried into effect the legislature had not exercised its power to tax such interests and thus an injunction against maricopa countys assessment of taxes on such interests was appropriate
B.