With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the postconviction court granting in part and denying in part his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Walker was convicted of two counts of armed robbery with a firearm in two separate incidents, and the trial court imposed consecutive prison sentences. On count one of the information, Walker was awarded 1376 days’ credit against the prison sentence for the time spent in county jail awaiting sentencing. In his rule 3.800(a) motion, Walker alleged that he was entitled to 1380 days’ credit on both counts. The postconviction court properly found that because Walker was sentenced to consecutive prison sentences, he was entitled to jail credit on count one, but not on count two. See Steadman v. State, 23 So.3d 811, 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (<HOLDING>). The postconviction court determined, based on

A: holding that a defendant is entitled to credit only for periods in which defendant is in actual or constructive control of jail or prison officials
B: holding that jail records can properly be considered in determining jail credit issues raised pursuant to rule 3800a
C: holding that a youth detention facility was a jail for purposes of statute requiring credit for time served in jail while awaiting trial
D: holding that a defendant who does not receive concurrent sentences on multiple charges  is not entitled to have his jail time credit pyramided by being given credit on each sentence for the full time he spends in jail awaiting disposition he is only entitled to jail credit on the first of the consecutive sentences quoting daniels v state 491 so2d 543 545 fla1986
D.