With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Withdraw. The lawyers shall provide written confirmation to the Court that they have provided this notice. SO ORDERED. 1 . The actual title holding arrangements were more complicated because of financing requirements of FAME’S predecessor, the Maine Guaranty Authority. Those intricacies, however, do not affect the issues at stake here. 2 . The definition of “claim” under the Code is very broad. Specifically, it includes: "right to payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured, or unsecured ...”. 11 U.S.C. § 101(4)(A). Alternatively, if the claims did not accrue for Bankruptcy Code purposes until the respo Forging Equipment, 743 F.Supp. 525, 530 (N.D.Ohio 1990)

A: holding that state law determines successor liability under cercla
B: holding that releases between tortfeasors to avoid liability under cercla are not valid
C: holding that a municipal sewer system that leaked hazardous waste could rely on a thirdparty defense to avoid liability under cercla
D: holding that notice not required because cercla is a strict liability statute
B.