With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". father is property of their respective bankruptcy estates. This is a core matter as it “concern[s] the administration of the estate.” § 157(b)(2); see also In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 930 (5th Cir. 1999). This Court may only hear a case in which venue is proper. 28 U.S.C. § 1408. In their petitions, both Ramirez and Eck-hardt state their residence is located in Laredo, Texas. [LR ECF No. 1 at 1]; [RE ECF No. 1 at 2]. Therefore, venue is proper. B. Constitutional Authority to Enter a Final Order This Court has an independent duty to evaluate whether it has the constitutional authority to sign a final order. Stem v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475 (2011).But see Wellness. Int’l Network v. Sharif, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1932, 1938-39, 191 L.Ed.2d 911 (2015) (<HOLDING>). The instant issue solely determines whether

A: holding that a federal court may refuse to exercise continuing jurisdiction even though the parties have agreed to it parties cannot confer jurisdiction by stipulation or consent
B: holding that in bankruptcyrelated matters any one party may remove the state court action without the consent of the other parties
C: holding that lack of jurisdiction cannot be cured by consent
D: holding that parties may consent to jurisdiction on noncore matters
D.