With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”). The Court provided a nonexclusive, illustrative list of such “presumptively lawful” exceptions, including but not limited to “longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill,” id. at 2816-17, but did not explain how lower courts were to identify other such “presumptively lawful” exceptions. More recently, the Court restated its belief in the existence of “presumptively lawful” regulations but again declined to provide any guidance to lower courts in our efforts to identify them. McDonald v. Chicago, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3047, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (<HOLDING>). Post-Heller, and now, post-McDonald, lower

A: holding second amendment right is incorporated against the states through fourteenth amendment
B: holding that the second amendment constrains state and local laws through its incorporation under the fourteenth amendment due process clause
C: holding that the second amendment fully applies to state and local regulation through the fourteenth amendment
D: holding the sixth amendment applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment
B.