With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the existence of circumstances that “shock the conscience” or implicate a fundamental unfairness within the system that would undermine judicial integrity if left unchecked. Id. (distinguishing the level of scrutiny afforded to fundamental error and reversible error). {48} Defendant does not argue that his innocence is indisputable or his guilt so doubtful that the jury’s verdict “shocks the conscience.” See Reyes, 2002-NMSC-024, ¶ 42, 132 N.M. 576, 52 P.3d 948 (finding of fundamental error only in the absence of substantial evidence to support the verdict); Cunningham, 2000-NMSC-009, ¶ 13, 128 N.M. 711, 998 P.2d 176. Indeed, he does not even claim there was a lack of substantial evidence to support his conviction. State v. Clark, 1999-NMSC-035, ¶ 3, 128 N.M. 119, 990 P.2d 793 (<HOLDING>). Defendant instead argues that the coercive

A: holding that issues not raised in an initial brief on appeal are deemed abandoned
B: holding that issues not raised in the initial brief on appeal are deemed abandoned
C: holding that issues not raised in an appellants initial brief are deemed abandoned
D: holding issues raised in docketing statement but not argued in the brief in chief are deemed abandoned
D.