With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". J. Affirmed. See Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 81 So.3d 556, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (<HOLDING>); 7550 Bldg., Inc. v. Atl. Rack & Shelving,

A: holding that in appellate proceedings the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error
B: holding evidence insufficient to overcome presumption of correctness
C: holding that the ambiguity in the testimony of the cited jurors who were challenged for cause was insufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness owed to the trial courts findings
D: holding that it is the appellants burden to present a record to overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial courts findings
D.