With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". administrators hire service providers to perform this compliance review. Pursuant to the agreement here, A & P hired Fidelity as a service provider to configure an online method to create a qualified DRO, develop administrative guidelines for determining whether a DRO is qualified, respond to inquiries, and review DROs to determine if they comply with Section 414(p) of the Internal Revenue Code. 2 . Notably, the fee was predetermined, and the amount charged was based on how the participant prepared die DRO. 3 . At the time that Fidelity was collecting the fee under the terms of the Trust Agreement, it was both a fid plan trustee who essentially negotiated on both sides of a mortgage transaction with the plan violated Section 406(b)); Cutaiar v. Marshall, 590 F.2d 523, 530 (3d Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>). 6 . Cf. Sixty-Five Sec. Plan v. Blue Cross

A: recognizing that the two statutes are nearly identical
B: holding that beneficiaries could not sue attorneys of the trust for legal malpractice because beneficiaries are not direct recipients of the attorneys services
C: holding that the csu board of trustees and individual trustees sued in their official capacity are a political arm of the state and as such are immune from suit
D: holding that a transfer between two funds where the trustees are identical but participants and beneficiaries are not violates section 406b
D.