With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1988). If a conflict occurs between the property used in the financing statement on file and that used in the security agreement, the security agreement prevails. Jones & Laughlin Supply v. Dugan Production Corp., 508 P.2d 1348 (N.M. 1973) (citing Ronald A. Anderson, Anderson on The Uniform Commercial Code § 9-204:9 (3d ed. 1996)). Further, the financing statement does not serve to add collateral not described in the security agreement. Kurtz v. Illinois Nat. Bank, 534 N.E.2d 1007 (Ill. a financing statement describes a greater quantity of property than that described in the corresponding security agreement, the security interest is defined by the narrower description contained within the security agreement[]”); Federal Land Bank v. Bay Park Place, 412 N.W.2d 222 (Mich. App. 1987) (<HOLDING>). In the case below, the security agreement was

A: holding that the trustee could not avoid a security interest under section 549 when that security interest was authorized by the bankruptcy court
B: holding that the intent to create a security interest in afteracquired property must be ascertained and judged by the language of the security agreement not the financing statement
C: holding that although a financing statement may be used to assist in the interpretation of the security agreement the financing statement does not create a security interest and cannot extend a security interest beyond what has been unambiguously described in a security agreement
D: holding security interest in insurance premiums perfected by creation of security interest
C.