With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". However, deterring harm to oneself is innate in all of the analyses of special governmental needs in similar circumstances when individuals are engaged in dangerous or safety-sensitive activities- and our discussion regarding harm to others did not limit that additional risk in any way. Id. at 323 (validating harm to oneself as part of Linn State’s primary concern arising from students under the influence while engaging in a safety-sensitive program when addressing the nature and immediacy prong of the balancing analysis). For example, in Skinner, the Court acknowledged the axiomatic nature of the governmental interest in ensuring the safety of the public “and of the employees themselves.” Skinner, 489 U.S. at 621, 109 S.Ct. 1402; see also Von Raab, 489 U.S. at 669-71, 109 S.Ct. 1384 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the court erred in declining to

A: recognizing that not only is the physical safety of border employees themselvesthose involved in drug interdiction and those who otherwise are required to carry firearmsthreatened in that line of work but also the safety of others at large should those employees carry out their duties in an impaired state
B: holding that even though some of employees duties appeared to satisfy the directly related element the element was not satisfied where those duties were not part of his primary duty
C: holding that under the first amendment speech can be pursuant to a public employees official job duties even though it is not required by or included in the employees job description or in response to a request by the employer
D: holding that probation department employees are not county employees
A.