With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". accompanied by other officers when he knocked on Gonzalez’s door. Because we are reviewing the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the officers, we accept Gonzalez’s version of the facts and his assertion that he was arrested by Overbey before the other officers arrived. See Pourmoghani-Esfahani v. Gee, 625 F.3d 1313, 1315 (11th Cir.2010). 5 . It is unclear whether Gonzalez was shown a copy of the arrest warrant or even if the arrest warrant had been signed by the magistrate judge when the officers completed the arrest. Because the arrest took place outside of Gonzalez’s home, even if there were no warrant at all, it was constitutional as long as it was based on probable cause. See United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 42, 96 S.Ct. 2406, 2409, 49 L.Ed.2d 300 (1976) (<HOLDING>). 6 . Gonzalez also appears to argue that the

A: holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment
B: holding that officers could execute a warrantless arrest of someone standing in the threshold of her dwelling
C: holding the petitioners act of retreating into her house could not thwart a warrantless arrest when it was set in motion in a public place upon probable cause
D: holding that the police officers had probable cause to make a warrantless entry
B.