With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". at 187-88 (quoting Bustamento v. Tucker, 607 So.2d 532, 537 (La.1992)); see also, David v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, 849 So.2d 38, 2003 WL 21511739 at *5 ("Statutes providing for prescriptive periods are to be strictly construed in favor of maintaining a cause of action”); Lima v. Schmidt, 595 So.2d 624, 629 (La.1992); Foster v. Breaux, 263 La. 1112, 270 So.2d 526, 529 (1972) ("Under Louisiana jurisprudence, prescriptive statutes are strictly construed, and of two permissible constructions that is adopted which favors maintaining rather than barring the action”); United Carbon Co. v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp., 230 La, 709, 89 So.2d 209, 212 (1956); Mansur v. Abraham, 183 La. 633, 164 So. 421, 425 (1935). Cf. State v. Stewart Bros. Cotton, 193 La. 16, 190 So. 317, 320 (1939) (<HOLDING>). 48 . Cole, 620 So.2d. at 1156. 49 . This

A: holding that a plan administrator was arbitrary and capricious in denying a plan participants claim that use of prescription narcotics rendered the participant disabled from the performance of his occupation and thus eligible for benefits under the plan without investigating the claim
B: holding that 1
C: holding that prescription is stricti juris
D: holding that comment k is not limited to prescription drugs but also is applicable to medical devices such as the plates implanted in the plaintiffs body
C.