With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". it appears that the majority opinion ignores the legal principles which must govern its review. The judicial lens through which this Court must examine the City’s exer cise of its police power is governed by well-established law, beginning with the premise that rational basis scrutiny “is the most relaxed and tolerant form of judicial scrutiny,” City of Dallas v. Stanglin, 490 U.S. 19, 26, 109 S.Ct. 1591, 104 L.Ed.2d 18 (1989) (emphasis added), and municipal zoning ordinances, which are legislative enactments, are presumed to be valid and constitutional. See Orange County v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 823 So.2d 732, 737 (Fla.2002) (specifying that ordinances reflecting legislative action are entitled to a presumption of validity); State v. Hanna, 901 So.2d 201, 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (<HOLDING>). Statutes and ordinances in Florida not only

A: holding that the workers compensation act is to be liberally construed and reasonable doubts as to construction are to be resolved in favor of coverage
B: holding any doubts concerning scope of arbitrable issues resolved in favor of arbitration
C: holding that the workers compensation act is to be liberally construed in the employees favor and any doubt in its construction is thus resolved in favor of the employee
D: holding that statutes and ordinances are presumed to be constitutional and all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of constitutionality
D.