With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". was accompanied by an actual record that corroborated the summary contained in the certifícate. Under these circumstances, Murphy’s rights secured by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment were not violated. The entry is: Judgment affirmed. 1 . Title 29-A M.R.S. § 2412-A(1-A) (2008) has since been amended. P.L. 2009, ch. 297 § 1 (effective Sept. 12, 2009) (codified at 29-A M.R.S. § 2412-AO-A) (2009)). Title 29-A M.R.S. § 2412-A(1-A) states in relevant part: 1-A. Offense; penalty. A person commits operating while license suspended or revoked if that person: A. Operates a motor vehicle on a public way or in a parking area when that person's license has been suspended or revoked, and that person: (1) Has received written notice of a suspension or revocati P.3d 990, 996-97 (2007) (<HOLDING>). 11 . See United States v. Garcia, 452 F.3d

A: holding that certified records of maintenance are nontestimonial and are not prepared for any particular defendant
B: holding that a certified abstract of a defendants driving record was nontestimonial
C: holding that the admission of a certified document stating that defendants license was suspended was nontestimonial
D: holding that a certified letter verifying that a defendant did not have a valid drivers license was nontestimonial and that washington courts have long recognized the inherent reliability and admissibility of driving records
D.