With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". . See id. § 15.064. 22 . See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Garrison, 966 S.W.2d 482, 484 (Tex.1998). 23 . See id. at 485. 24 . See Tex. Gov't Code § 311.021(4). 25 . See Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 840. 26 . See Huie v. DeShazo, 922 S.W.2d 920, 927-28 (Tex.1996). 27 . See Tex.R. Civ. P. 86(1). 28 . See Tex.R. Civ. P. 87(2)(a), (3)(a); Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Dep't, 886 S.W.2d 259, 260-61 (Tex.1994). 29 . See Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc., 868 S.W.2d 752, 757 (Tex.1993). 30 . See Tex.R. Civ. P. 87(2)(a); Masonite, 997 S.W.2d at 197 n. 16; Wilson, 886 S.W.2d at 260 n. 1 (Tex.1994). 31 . See Tex Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code § 15.018(b)(2). 32 . Id. 33 . Id. § 15.001(a). 34 . See Tex. Gov’t Code § 311.011(b); Transport Ins. Co. v. Faircloth, 898 S.W.2d 269, 274 (Tex. 1995). 35 . See Ruiz, 868 S.W.2d at 759 (<HOLDING>). 36 . See Webster’s Third New International

A: holding that an entity may qualify as a state agency for some purposes while being classified as a local agency for other purposes
B: holding that oil company foreman lacked discretion and authority to constitute an agency or representative for venue purposes
C: holding that an appeal to an agency review board would be futile because the board lacked authority to invalidate ordinance as requested
D: holding grant of authority to an agency to adopt rules necessary to carry out this chapter clearly vested in the agency authority to interpret a statute
B.