With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". only qualified, good faith immunity attaches. Isasi v. Heinemann, No. 08-CV-5284, 2009 WL 159601, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2009); see also Woodard v. Mennella, 861 F.Supp. 192, 197 (E.D.N.Y.1994); Kane v. Han, 550 F.Supp. 120, 122-23 (E.D.N.Y.1982); Gutierrez v. Vergari, 499 F.Supp. 1040, 1047 n. 5 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Le Grand v. Evan, 702 F.2d 415, 418 (2d Cir.1983) (“Although we have not passed on the issue, many courts have accorded clerks only a qualified ‘good faith’ immunity from liability arising from ministerial acts.”). On the other hand, even for administrative functions, absolute judicial immunity protects court clerks in the performance of tasks “which are judicial in nature and an integral part of the judicial process.” Rodriguez v. Weprin, 116 F.3d 62, 66 (2d Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). Thus, a clerk’s acts that implement judicial

A: holding that a clerks scheduling duties as part of a courts inherent power to control its docket is subject to absolute immunity
B: recognizing broad district court discretion to stay proceedings as an incident to its power to control its docket
C: recognizing inherent power of courts of appeals
D: holding that district courts have inherent power to control their dockets as long as its exercise is not inconsistent with a rule or statute
A.