With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the United States of America on Behalf of the Department of Education by the Plaintiff, Betty Elizabeth Buckland (Doc. 64) entered October 2, 2009. 8 . See response to Interrogatory 4, Exhibit M. 9 . See Exhibit L, Debtor’s responses to Interrogatory No. 9. In a supplemented response, he also included that he held a certification or license as an Interior Structure Fire Instructor, SCBA Fit Tester, DRI Underwater Scene Investigator, DRI Swift-Water Rescuer, FEMA Incident Command Systems, Kansas EMT-I, and National Environment Health Association Radon Mitigation Contractor. See Exhibit M, Interrogatory No. 9. 10 . 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). 11 . See In re Lindberg, 170 B.R. 462 (Bankr. D.Kan.1994). 12 . Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. v. Polleys (In re Polleys), 356 F.3d 1302, 1309 (10th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). 13 . Id. at 1307. 14 . Id. 15 . Alderete v.

A: holding that a financial guaranty payable in new york is a contract to perform services in new york subjecting foreign guarantor to jurisdiction under  302a1
B: holding jurisdiction over nonresident defendant existed where note was payable in new york contained new york choice of law clause and proceeds were used to finance new york limited partnership
C: holding that contract signed in new york by promisor from florida and partially performed in florida was governed by new york law because it was executed in new york
D: holding that the tenth circuit would adopt threepronged test established by brunner v new york state higher educ services corp 831 f2d 395 2nd cir1987
D.