With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1940); Rabinowitz v. United States, 366 F.2d 34, 55 (5th Cir. 1966). 74 . See United States v. Duke, 263 F.Supp. 828, 836 (S.D.Ind.1967). 75 . See 28 U.S.C. § 1864 (1970). 76 . See S.Rep. No. 981, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. at 30 (1967); H.Rep. No. 1076, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. at 12 (1968). 77 . A variety of demarcation lines have been suggested. See Rabinowitz v. United States, 366 F.2d 34 (5th Cir. 1966) (sixth grade); United States v. Henderson, 298 F.2d 522 (7th Cir. 1962) (8th grade). 78 . See Vlandis v. Kline, 412 U.S. 441, 93 S.Ct. 2230, 37 L.Ed.2d 63 (1973); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535, 91 S.Ct. 1586, 29 L.Ed. 90 (1971). 79 . See United States v. Butera, 420 F.2d 564, 571 (1st Cir. 1970) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Bryant, 291 F.Supp. 542, 551

A: holding that where material misrepresentations are made to class members an inference of reliance arises to the entire class
B: recognizing a narrow class of cases in which the termination of the class representatives claim for relief does not moot the claims of the class members
C: holding less educated are a cognizable class
D: holding that it is error to certify class when named class representatives are not members of the class they purport to represent
C.