With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the action filed by the Wortley parties stems from a bankruptcy in a literal sense (because the alleged scheme purportedly took place during the Trafford bankruptcy proceedings), it is not the sort of case that would arise only in bankruptcy because the corruption or improper conduct of a judge can occur in any type of legal proceeding. Cf., e.g., United States v. Shenberg, 89 F.3d 1461, 1465-68 (11th Cir. 1996) (detailing extensive judicial corruption in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida). This case also does not involve any rights created by federal bankruptcy law. The complaint only asserts state-law tort claims, which are not created by the Bankruptcy Code and are not particular to federal bankruptcy law. See, e.g., Waldman v. Stone, 698 F.3d 910, 922 (6th Cir. 2012) (<HOLDING>); Howell Hydrocarbons, Inc. v. Adams, 897 F.2d

A: holding that the creditor must prove the elements of actual fraud
B: holding that ordinary statelaw claims for fraud against creditor were not core proceedings
C: holding that a lawsuit by a third party creditor against the estate is a core proceeding
D: holding that  362k claims are core
B.