With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". resulted in a discharge. See 11 U.S.C. § 1328(f)(1). Although Chapter 20 cases are permitted, TD Bank and the Trustee encourage this Court to adopt a per se rule making lien stripping in a Chapter 20 case contingent upon the entry of a Chapter 13 discharge. A general review of lien stripping is instructive. “In a ‘strip off the entire lien is removed, whereas in a ‘strip down’ a lien is bifurcated into secured and unsecured claims with only the unsecured claim component being removed.’ ” Johnson v. Asset Management Group, LLC, 226 B.R. 364, 365 n. 3 (D.Md.1998) (citing In re Lam, 211 B.R. 36, 37 n. 2 (9th Cir. BAP 1997)). It is well established that a debtor is precluded from lien stripping in Chapter 7 cases. See Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992) (<HOLDING>); see also Ryan v. Homecomings Financial

A: holding that the words allowed secured claim in  506d refer to a claim that is secured by a lien and allowed under  502
B: holding that the meaning of allowed secured claim in  506a does not determine the meaning of allowed secured claim in  506d
C: holding that section 506d does not permit the strip down of a partially secured lien
D: holding that the lien bond releases the property from the lien but the lien is then secured by the bond
C.