With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". must consider factual inferences tending to show triable issues in the light most favorable to the existence of those issues.”). The court’s function is not to weigh the evidence, but merely to determine whether there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmovant for a finder of fact to return a verdict in that party’s favor. Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249, 106 S.Ct. 2505. Essentially, the court performs the threshold inquiry of determining whether a trial is necessary. Id. at 250, 106 e, 930 F.Supp. 493, 498 (D.Colo.1996)(opining IGRA does not contain provisions giving private individuals a cause of action against tribe and state for Tribal-State Compact and Tribal Gaming Ordinance lack of compliance with IGRA); Montgomery v. Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, 905 F.Supp. 740, 744 (D.S.D.1995)(<HOLDING>). Additionally, violations of a federal statute

A: holding former employee of tribeowned casino has no private remedy under the ada because of tribal exemption
B: holding that there was no federal subject matter jurisdiction under the private cause of action provision of the act
C: holding that no private right of action exists
D: holding no private cause of action under igra for family alleging its tribe practiced favoritism in distributing casino profits
D.