With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia designed to assure adequate medical care and medical facilities for the people of the state. The state’s interest and the state’s involvement, in its sovereign capacity, in the treatment of a specific patient by an attending physician in the University Hospital are slight, equally slight is the control exercised by the state over the physician in the treatment accorded that patient. Id. (emphasis added); see also Gargiulo, 239 Va. at 213, 387 S.E.2d at 790 (“[T]he student function is essential to achievement of the Commonwealth’s goal, one undertaken in the public interest, of training and maintaining a pool of specialists skilled in a particular discipline.”); Carter v. University of Va. Health Sys., 52 Va. Cir. 416 (Charlottesville 2000) (<HOLDING>). But cf. Lilly v. Brink, 51 Va. Cir. 444

A: holding that a hearing officer acting in a judicial capacity was entitled to claim judicial immunity and could not be compelled to give testimony about his mental process in deciding a case
B: holding that individuals acting in a legislative capacity at a regional level are entitled to absolute immunity
C: holding that the united states constitution does not entitle one state to sovereign immunity in a second states courts and stating a claim of immunity in another sovereigns courts    necessarily implicates the power and authority of a second sovereign its source must be found either in an agreement or in the voluntary decision of the second to respect the dignity of the first as a matter of comity
D: holding that an anesthesiology resident in her second year of postdoctoral training was acting in a student capacity in providing patient care and was thus entitled to sovereign immunity
D.