With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". S.Ct. 1575, 1580-81, 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947); Chisholm v. FCC, 538 F.2d 349, 365 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. FCC, 429 U.S. 890, 97 S.Ct. 247, 50 L.Ed.2d 173 (1976). 20 . See Amer. Cyanamid Co. v. Food and Drug Admin., 606 F.2d 1307, 1320 (D.C.Cir.1979) (stating "FDA may, on a case-by-case basis, define and narrow the statutory requirement of adequate tests by announcing and applying particular principles of scientific methodology.") 21 . SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 203, 67 S.Ct. 1575, 1580, 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947). 22 . Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment at 6. 23 . Plaintiffs’ SJ at 31. 24 . See Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535, 539, 91 S.Ct. 1586, 1589, 29 L.Ed.2d 90 (1971) (<HOLDING>) 25 . See Wells Fargo Armored Serv. Corp. v.

A: holding that a public employee who may only be terminated for cause has a property interest in his position that is protected by the 14th amendment
B: holding that entitlement to benefits is a property interest protected by the due process clause of the fifth amendment to the united states constitution
C: holding that licenses issued under minnesota law do not create property interests in renewal that are protected by due process clause
D: holding driving licenses to be property protected by the 14th amendment
D.