With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". aspect of a case.'); Hunt v. NationsCredit Fin. Servs. Corp., 902 So.2d 75, 81 (Ala.Civ.App.2004) (concluding that Niezer stands for the proposition that 'an order denying an award of attorney fees that is ancillary to an earlier decision and has completely adjudicated all matters in controversy between the parties is immediately appealable’ and is consistent with the United States Supreme Court decision in Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S. 196, 108 S.Ct. 1717, 100 L.Ed.2d 178 (1988)); Sparks v. Parker, 368 So.2d 528 (Ala.1979) (reviewing a trial court's order establishing and administering Calhoun County's indigent-defense system by way of an appeal); C.A. Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 3915.6 (2d ed.1992); Clark v. Johnson, 278 F.3d 459 (5th Cir.2002)(<HOLDING>). Cf. Sprague v. Ticonic Nat’l Bank, 307 U.S.

A: holding that an order was interlocutory in nature despite the trial courts certification of the order as a final appealable judgment
B: holding that a bankruptcy court order denying a trustees claim to immunity was final and appealable under the collateral order doctrine
C: holding that an order denying compensation under the federal criminal justice act for services performed before a state clemency board by counsel appointed to represent a state prisoner was final and appealable despite the fact that the order was separate from the merits of the habeas corpus proceeding
D: holding adjudication order based upon a determination on the merits in juvenile court is a final and appealable order
C.