With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". not scientific methodology”)- • Human Dechallenge/Rechallenge Reports. While these reports have more control than the ordinary case reports do, there is still a lack of control in these reports and they do not contain a testable and systematic inquiry into the mechanism of causation. Here, the adverse events involve events other than ICH. Furthermore, the number of dechallenge/rechallenge reports is too scant — especially given the lack of adequate controls employed — to reliably screen out other causes or con-founders to show that Parlodel causes ICH or would operate as a vasocon-strictor under Mrs. Caraker’s circumstances. This Court rejects the plaintiffs’ experts opinions inasmuch as they rely on these human dechal-lenge/rechallenge reports. Accord Glastetter, 252 F.3d at 990-91 (<HOLDING>); Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp., 95

A: holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting police reports in civil case under publicrecords exception
B: holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion rejecting these human dechallengerechallenge reports
C: holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the incomplete and late submission of expert reports was not harmless
D: holding that court was within its discretion to refuse to consider reports that did not meet the supreme courts standards for admitting reports into evidence
B.