With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1076 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied sub nom. Monroe v. Johnson, 523 U.S. 1041, 118 S.Ct. 1342, 140 L.Ed.2d 502 (1998). Effective December 1, 2009, Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts requires this Court to issue or deny a CoA when it enters a final order adverse to a federal habeas corpus petitioner. Under the AEDPA, before a petitioner may appeal the denial of a habeas corpus petition filed under Section 2254, the petitioner must obtain a CoA. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Likewise, under the AEDPA, appellate review of a habeas petition is limited to the issues on which a CoA is granted. See Crutcher v. Cockrell, 301 F.3d 656, 658 n. 10 (5th Cir.2002)(<HOLDING>); Jones v. Cain, 227 F.3d 228, 230 n. 2 (5th

A: holding that appellate review in a habeas ease is limited to the issues specified in the coa
B: holding that appellate review is limited to the issues specified in the coa
C: holding a coa is granted on an issuebyissue basis thereby limiting appellate review to those issues
D: holding the scope of appellate review of denial of a habeas petition limited to the issues on which coa has been granted
C.