With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1970). The intention of the testator is the polestar of any will construction proceeding. Estate of Lenahan, 511 So.2d at 371-72. Consequently, where a latent ambiguity exists, extrinsic evidence reflecting the testator’s intent is admissible. Id. at 371; Estate of Rice, 406 So.2d at 476. For example, in Scheurer, a testatrix devised trust income to her “presently-living grandchildren” who survive her but had no known grandchildren. The Fifth District held that the will contained a latent ambiguity and affirmed a trial court’s decision allowing the admission of extrinsic evidence to show that the testatrix considered the children of her former husband’s son to be her grandchildren. Scheurer, 240 So.2d at 176; see also Humana, Inc. v. Estate of Scheying, 483 So.2d 113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (<HOLDING>). In the instant case, the will contains a

A: holding admissible a letter which a woman had purportedly written to a judge 2 days before her death stating that her husband had threatened her and she feared him where the defendant husband claimed she had threatened him
B: holding that plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint to add her husband as a defendant did not relate back because her failure to sue her husband was not due to misnomer or mistake involving the identity of the proper party but because the law at the time of the complaint did not allow one spouse to sue another in tort
C: holding victim waived physicianpatient privilege by authorizing her doctor to release her medical records to the department of criminal investigation because the information contained in her medical records was no longer confidential between herself and her physician
D: holding that devise to apollo medical center should go to humana inc the corporation that acquired apollo because decedent intended to devise half her residuary estate to the hospital at which her husband was treated before his death
D.