With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". case of a single temporary total disability. Nor is it an ordinary case of a residual partial disability of a hand, in which the percentage of loss of use determines the percentage of benefits, as in Babineaux v. Great American Ins. Co., 1964, 245 La. 718, 160 So.2d 591. Babineaux notes a legislative intent “to liberalize the compensation act and extend coverage so as to include, as nearly as possible, recovery for every type of injury . . . . ” 160 So.2d at 593. Nevertheless, R.S. 23:1221(4) (p) does not provide for every case not earlier covered in § 1221, but only for those of disfigurement or serious permanent impairment of the usefulness of a physical function: subsec. (4) (p) “is not a catch-all clause,” Bergeron v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 1962, 243 La. 108, 141 So.2d 832 (<HOLDING>)- In Babineaux a distal phalanx of an index

A: holding a miscarriage not compensable under subsec 4p
B: holding that measures to enforce judgment are compensable
C: holding that a  15 lien did not apply because that section does not require reimbursement for an injury not compensable under c 152
D: holding that employees stress injury solely due to disciplinary proceedings was not compensable under workers compensation
A.