With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". we agree with the trial court that the Property Appraiser must consider “the present use of the property” pursuant to section 193.011, we also observe that the Property Appraiser was required to consider all of the factors listed in that section in reaching his assessment. See Schultz v. TM Florida-Ohio Realty Ltd. Partnership, 577 So.2d 573 (Fla.1991); Roden v. Estech, Inc., 508 So.2d 728 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Bystrom v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, 416 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Although a presumption of correctness attaches to a property appraiser’s assessment, that presumption is lost if the property appraiser fails to consider the factors in section 193.011. See Havill v. Lake Port Properties, Inc., 729 So.2d 467 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). See also Bystrom, 416 So.2d at 1141 (<HOLDING>). The Property Appraiser, as plaintiff below,

A: recognizing same factors
B: holding that the failure to consider the necessary factors renders the valuation invalid
C: holding that a district courts failure to consider the 18 usc  3553a factors was plain error relying on gall
D: holding that the trial court must consider these factors in denying appellants petition to transfer prior to trial
B.