With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the evidence that an exception to discharge applies.” In re Cunningham, 482 B.R. 444, 447 (Bankr.N.D.Ala.2012) (citing In re Bullock, 670 F.3d 1160, 1164 (11th Cir.2012); In re Griffith, 206 F.3d 1389, 1396 (11th Cir.2000)). A debt is nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) if it is a debt for a willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or its property. In re Santry, 481 B.R. 824, 828-29 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.2012) (citing Kawaauhau v. Geiger, 523 U.S. 57, 61, 118 S.Ct. 974, 140 L.Ed.2d 90 (1998)). Thus, a party objecting to a debtor’s discharge must show that the debt arose from an in e not excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(6). Kawaauhau, 523 U.S. at 64, 118 S.Ct. 974. Maxfield v. Jennings (In re Jennings), 670 F.3d 1329, 1334 (11th Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>). For conduct to be malicious, courts typically

A: holding that a fraudulent transfer of property by a coconspirator constituted a willful and malicious injury under section 523a6 because the debtor transferred property without just cause in an attempt to place it beyond the reach of a creditor
B: holding that the debtor could retain exempt property because it was not property of the estate
C: holding that because debtor retained control of property a transfer had not yet occurred
D: holding that property seized by a creditor prior to debtors bankruptcy was property of the estate even though creditor  the irs  held a secured interest  a tax lien  in the property
A.