With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". provision relevant to pretrial motions filed by a criminal defendant excluded the “time after a hearing has been held where a district court awaits additional filings from the parties that are needed for proper disposition of the motion.” 476 U.S. at 331. The Court of Appeals thus did not err in affirming the finding of the district court that the entire period between filing and final disposition of Feldhacker’s pretrial motions was excluded from the speedy trial computation. In computing the excluded period, the Court of Appeals correctly followed State v. Baker, 264 Neb. 867, 652 N.W.2d 612 (2002), and determined that the first excludable day was September 22, 2000, the day after Feldhacker filed his pretrial motions. See, also, State v. Oldfield, 236 Neb. at 443, 461 N.W.2d at 561 (<HOLDING>). To the extent that State v. Recek, 263 Neb.

A: holding that oneyear period commences on date of discovery of the fraudulent nature of the transfer
B: holding that the 120day period commences when the applicant appears in person for the interview
C: holding that time granted for preparing pretrial motions is not automatically excludable under  3161h1 but is excludable only after the district court enters appropriate findings under  3161h7a
D: holding an excludable period under  2912074a commences on the day immediately after the filing of a defendants pretrial motion
D.