With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". with the legislative intent of the statute. Pretrial intervention is an avenue open to a large class of offenders, whereas conditional discharge is only available to a limited and specifically identified group. Given this narrow reading of § 27, the conclusion is inescapable that extending conditional discharge to an entirely new class of offenders, namely those charged with obtaining possession of a CDS by fraud under N.J.S.A. 24:21-22(a)(3), would be beyond the explicit language and legitimate scope of § 27. In further support of her contention that conditional discharges are appropriate for violations of N.J.S.A. 24:21-22(a)(3), Telcher relies on Law Division cases which have extended § 27 beyond its literal terms. See State v. D’Ambrosio, 200 N.J.Super. 463 (Law Div.1985) (<HOLDING>); State v. Sanders, 169 N.J.Super. 596 (Law

A: holding that  27 extends to possession of drug paraphernalia a violation of njsa 242147 where defendant was also charged with possession of marihuana under 242120a4
B: holding that possession of a pistol in public requires knowing possession
C: holding in part that defendant charged with unlawful possession of heroin marihuana and narcotics implements was eligible for a conditional discharge
D: holding that a spouses joint occupancy of a home where drug paraphernalia was found was insufficient to establish the spouses constructive possession
A.