With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the arbitrary and capricious standard, the re-; viewing court may consider only the evidence that the administrators themselves considered. See Miller v. United Welfare Fund, 72 F.3d 1066, 1071 (2d Cir.1995) (“[A] district court’s review under the arbitrary and capricious standard is limited to the administrative record.”); Lee v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield, 10 F.3d 1547, 1550 (11th Cir.1994) (requiring courts “to look only to the facts known to the administrator”); Taft v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, 9 F.3d 1469, 1471-72 (9th Cir.1993) (fearing that examination beyond the administrative record would too easily lead to findings of abuse of discretion, defeating the goal of ERISA to resolve disputes expeditiously); Abnathya v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., 2 F.3d 40, 48 n. 8 (3d Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); Oldenburger v. Central States Southeast &

A: holding that judicial review of an administrative agencys decision is limited solely to whether given the relevant standard and facts the agencys decision was arbitrary illegal capricious or unreasonable
B: holding that evaluations submitted after the committees final decision cannot be considered in determining whether the decision was arbitrary and capricious
C: holding that evidence contrary to an administrators decision does not make the decision arbitrary and capricious so long as a reasonable basis appears for the decision
D: holding that when the agencys decision was based on an erroneous and completely unsupported assumption the decision was arbitrary and capricious
B.