With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". be found” at 8 Roberts Street. Gates, 462 U.S. at 238, 103 S.Ct. 2317. The Court finds that there are several reasonable inferences from the facts which establish a nexus between the evidence from the robbery and the location of the search in this case. First, the affidavit provides that the officers confirmed with Defendant’s aunt, Marsha Bacon, that he lived at 8 Roberts Street after conducting a “knock and talk” with her at the residence. (Govt.Ex. 1). Second, the contraband from the robbery — the firearm, cash and a ring — are of a size that could readily be hidden almost anywhere, are among the types of items that criminals would likely hide in their residences and these items remained unaccounted for after Defendant was arrested on June 30, 2010. See Jones, 994 F.2d at 1056 (<HOLDING>). Third, the location of the robbery, at 2042

A: holding that a city which brought an action for forfeiture of firearms recovered from a drug suspects residence was collaterally estopped from introducing evidence of drug possession thus it could not prove the firearms were used in drug transactions and could not forfeit them
B: holding that nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on  laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings 
C: holding that cash is the type of loot that criminals seek to hide in secure places like their homes and items such as firearms are the types of evidence likely to be kept in a suspects residence
D: recognizing that the nexus between the place to be searched and the items to be seized may be established by the nature of the item and the normal inferences of where one would likely keep such evidence internal quotation marks omitted
C.