With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". See Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 383, 112 S.Ct. 2031, 119 L.Ed.2d 157 (1992) ("The ordinary meaning of [relating to] is a broad one ... and the words thus express a broad pre-emptive purpose."). Laws of general applicability may be preempted by the ADA; they need not actually prescribe airline prices, routes, or services. See Hodges v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 44 F.3d 334, 336 (5th Cir.1995) (en banc). Moreover, "ADA preemption is not limited to claims brought directly against air carriers. Rather, claims are preempt ed if they ‘relate to’ the prices, routes or services of an air carrier.” Lyn-Lea Travel Corp. v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 283 F.3d 282, 287 n. 8 (5th Cir.2002) (citations omitted). Nor is preemption limited to state laws or regulations. See id. at 287-89 (<HOLDING>). Not all claims that may have economic

A: holding that common law misrepresentation claims were not preempted because they did not conflict with a fmvss
B: holding plaintiffs state law claims of inter alia tortious interference with contract are preempted by section 301 of lmra
C: holding the state law claims were not preempted
D: holding inter alia that common law claims were preempted
D.