With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Specifically, under the ADAAA, “the term ‘substantially limits’ [is to be] interpreted and applied to require a degree of functional limitation that is lower than the standard for ‘substantially limits’ applied prior to the ADAAA.” 29 C.F.R. § 1630.20(j) (iv)). The issue of whether or not a hernia may qualify as a disability under the ADA, and parallel state laws, after the 2008 amendments is now an open question, with several federal district courts finding that it does qualify. See e.g. Bob-Maunuel v. Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc., 10 F.Supp.3d 854, 881 (N.D.Ill.2014)(finding that Plaintiffs hernia constituted a disability that substantially limited the major life activity of lifting); Butler v. BTC Foods, Inc., No. CIV. A. 12-0492, 2014 WL 336649, at *4 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 30, 2014)(<HOLDING>). However, at least one federal court has found

A: holding that a verified complaint is treated as an affidavit for summary judgment purposes and considered in determining whether material issues of fact exist
B: holding that opting for conservative treatment instead of surgery is not substantial evidence that the claimant was not disabled
C: holding summary judgment was not warranted because material facts were in dispute
D: holding that plaintiff established for purposes of summary judgment a material question as to whether he was disabled because of hernia surgery
D.