With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". with third parties. McCormick, 333 F.3d 1234. 5 . This fact, and others, undermine Earth-Cam’s claim that the content of a customer's webpage is a “trade secret” be -3020(JBS), 2009 WL 140518, at *9-10 (D.N.J. Jan. 20, 2009) ("a litigant may not introduce statements from its own answers to interrogatories or requests for admission as evidence because such answers typically constitute hearsay when used in this manner.”) (collecting cases). See also Gross v. Burggraf Constr. Co., 53 F.3d 1531, 1541-42 (10th Cir.1995); Johnson v. Gestamp Alabama, LLC, 946 F.Supp.2d 1180, 1196 (N.D.Ala.2013) (noting that several Circuits have held that a party cannot use its own self-serving answers to an interrogatory on summary judgment). But see Johnson v. Holder, 700 F.3d 979, 982 (7th Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>). Even if EarthCam’s self-serving response

A: holding that a nonhearsay response to an interrogatory that is based on personal knowledge may be considered as evidence on summary judgment
B: holding that because plaintiff failed to advance evidence rebutting motion for summary judgment alongside a concession in their interrogatory response the district court did not err in granting defendants motion for summary judgment
C: holding that summary judgment may be reversed when it is based on an error of law
D: holding that unsworn statements may not be considered on a motion for summary judgment
A.