With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". set forth in the complaint alleges a violation of both the federal constitution and federal statutes. See Complaint ¶¶ 48-68. The complaint also clearly asks for prospective relief. . See Complaint, “Relief Sought” ¶¶ 1-4. Specifically, the Plaintiffs ask for a determination that portions of North Dakota’s hunting regulations are unconstitutional and for a permanent injunction preventing the Defendants from any attempts to enforce these provisions. The only portion of the complaint that could conceivably be construed as a request for a monetary disbursement is thé request f ts found that the “special sovereignty interests” of states were implicated so that Coeur d’Alene would operate to bar the suit. See MacDonald v. Village of Northport Michigan, 164 F.3d 964, 972 (6th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>); ANR Pipeline v. Lafaver, 150 F.3d 1178, 1193

A: holding a states regulation of liquor was not a special sovereignty interest in part because of the pervasive federal interest in the regulation of liquor
B: holding that a states great interest in maintaining access to the great lakes was a special sovereignty interest that precluded an ex parte young suit
C: recognizing that palmyra is under united states sovereignty
D: holding states property interest in right to profits from a recreational land lease did not rise to the level of a special sovereignty interest
B.