With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016, 1020 (6th Cir.1983); see also Jerry v. UAW-Local 735, 818 F.2d 866 (6th Cir.1987) (unpublished table decision) (“A ruling on a Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, motion to vacate is appealable.... ”). As other courts have noted in addressing the appealability of Rule 60(b) orders, “the finality of such orders derives from the finality of the underlying judgment upon which relief is sought.” Mason v. Integrity Ins. Co. (In re Mason), 709 F.2d 1313, 1315 (9th Cir.1983). In this case, the underlying order — the supplemental sale order — is itself a final order. See Precision Indus., Inc. v. Qualitech Steel SBQ, LLC, 327 F.3d 537, 543 (7th Cir.2003); cf. Winget v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 537 F.3d 565, 579 (6th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). In concluding that this court lacks appellate

A: holding that res judicata did not apply where a trial courts order was not a final judgment
B: holding that a bankruptcy courts sale order is a final order for res judicata purposes
C: holding that an unappealed contempt order by a bankruptcy court is a final judgment on the merits for res judicata purposes
D: holding that a bankruptcy order is not final unless it 1
B.