With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. Willie Frank Davis appeals the denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Davis was sentenced in 1985 for offenses committed on June 4, 1984. Davis was sentenced under the 1984 guidelines. Davis, however, committed his offenses before the effective date of the 1984 guidelines. See Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989) (<HOLDING>). Thus, if Davis did not affirmatively elect to

A: holding that offenses sentenced on the same day by the same judge are not related under the guidelines
B: holding that application of guidelines did not violate the ex post facto clause because rico offense was a straddle crime that continued before and after the effective date of the guidelines
C: holding that the fsas more lenient penalties apply to defendants who committed their crimes before the acts effective date but were sentenced after that date
D: holding that guidelines did not become effective until adopted by the legislature on july 1 1984 and those who committed their offenses before the effective date must affirmatively elect to be sentenced under the guidelines
D.