With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". In re Terminal Moving & Storage Co., 631 F.2d 547, 551 (8th Cir.1980) (era banc) (“The fact that the benefit of this agreement accrued to ... the sole stockholder of [the corporation] and not the corporation does not detract from the fact that the secured party gave value for the security interest. Since consideration sufficient to support a simple contract was present, value was given and the security interest attached.”); Pittsburgh Tube Co. v. Tri-Bend, Inc., 185 Mich.App. 581, 463 N.W.2d 161, 164 (Mich.App.1990) (“By its plain language, UCC 9-203(1) does not require that debtor receive anything in order for the security agreement to attach; it only requires that the secured party give value.”); Owen v. Vibrosearch Exploration, Inc., 694 S.W.2d 421, 424 (Tex.Ct.App.-Hous.1985) (<HOLDING>). Judge Van Antwerpen’s opinion in Adelvision,

A: recognizing satisfaction of a valid debt as adequate consideration in a transfer of real property
B: holding that satisfaction of preexisting debt of corporate affiliate was sufficient to support jury finding of fair consideration for the transfer of valid security interest
C: holding that a preexisting or antecedent debt may constitute sufficient consideration to support a mortgage
D: holding that plaintiffs forbearance from suit against subsidiary was sufficient consideration to support defendants guaranty of defendants subsidiarys preexisting debt
B.