With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". scenario.'is, the subject of Meister v. Jamison (In re Jamison), 21 B.R. 380, 381 (Bankr.D.Conn.1982). The Court in Jamison held, as the Court holds" here, that the son was not liable for the- car payments made by, the debtor, his father, to the credit union. 5 . The same holds true for. instances in which a debtor, prepetition, depletes his assets under circumstances in which a trustee believes the' decision was unwise, such as when a debtor buys dinner for his friends or purchases an expensive prom dress for his daughter. In these scenarios, a trustee likely has no authority to judge all of the debtor’s prepetition decisions and thus likely has no remedy. However, such a scenario is not now before the Court. See, e.g. Montoya v. Campos (In re Tarin), 454 B.R. 179 (Bankr.D.N.M.2011)

A: holding that a wife is not liable simply by virtue of the marital relationship for her husbands fraudulent acts
B: holding that the applicant was entitled to asylum based on her fear that her daughter will be forced to undergo female genital mutilation because her fear of  being forced to witness the pain and suffering of her daughter is wellfounded
C: holding that trial court properly terminated fathers obligation to support his seventeenyearold daughter who refused to live with father but instead chose to reside in her own apartment after her mother moved out of state where daughter offered no justifiable reason for not living with her father daughter only contended that her stepmother was too neat for her and that she wanted to live closer to her friends
D: holding that debtors daughter was not liable under fraudulent transfer law for the amount her parents paid for her wedding prepetition
D.