With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that right." Id. at 447. Dr. Richards and the Fund do not dispute that the Martins have a vested property right in their cause of action. However, they contend that the Martins have never had a vested right to a particular measure of damages, citing Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Env. Study Group, 438 U.S. 59, 88 n.32 (1978) (" 'A person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law'"); Powers v. Allstate Ins. Co., 10 Wis. 2d 78, 88-92, ng that in a wrongful death action, the date of injury determines the tortfeasor's liability." '[R]ights growing out of a wrong must relate to the happening of the wrong itself.' ") (citation omitted), and may not be amended unless necessary for an important public purpose. See State ex rel. Briggs & Stratton, 100 Wis. 2d at 658 (<HOLDING>). The right to unlimited damages was implicit

A: holding that the right to recover a particular measure of damages in a workers compensation case is fixed as of the date of injury
B: holding that the fixed measure of damages may not be retroactively amended simply for the purpose of offsetting the late adoption of a law
C: holding that where the customary measure of damages for a vendors failure or refusal to convey land was inapplicable the measure of damages must be flexible enough to vary with the necessities of the situation
D: holding failure to raise issue of improper measure of damages in trial court waived review of complaints that proper measure of damages was not submitted to jury and that plaintiff failed to present evidence on the proper measure
B.