With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Petitioner Bertha Rivera de Zavala seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) entry of a final order of removal. We deny the petition. 1. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s and IJ’s adverse credibility determination. See Tekle v. Mukasey, 583 F.3d 1044, 1051 (9th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). Petitioner’s testimony conflicted on key

A: holding the wcjs credibility determinations precluded any meaningful appellate review because the court had to imagine why the wcj made such credibility determinations
B: holding that credibility determinations are reviewed only for substantial evidence
C: holding that credibility determinations are for the jury
D: holding that we review adverse credibility determinations for substantial evidence
D.