With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". greater risk that he may be held accountable if his information proves false.” United States v. Salazar, 945 F.2d 47, 50-51 (2d Cir.1991); accord Canfield, 212 F.3d at 719. In addition to considering an informant’s veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge, in assessing the totality of the circumstances we also evaluate whether the information an informant provides is corroborated by independent police investigation, Canfield, 212 F.3d at 719-20, because an informant who is right about some facts is more likely to be right about others, Gates, 462 U.S. at 241-46, 103 S.Ct. 2317. We consider such corroboration in evaluating the existence of probable cause even if only an informant’s account of anticipated innocent activities is confirmed. See Gates, 462 U.S. at 244, 103 S.Ct. 2317 (<HOLDING>); Canfield, 212 F.3d at 720 (2d Cir.2000)

A: holding that the corroboration of facts in an anonymous informants letter that the defendants car would be in florida that one of the defendants would fly to florida within the next day or so and that the defendant would then drive towards bloomington indiana all contributed to a legitimate belief that the informants additional assertions of criminal activity were true and probable cause had been established
B: holding that a known informants statement can support probable cause even though the affidavit fails to provide any additional basis for the known informants credibility
C: holding that probable cause may be gleaned from the hearsay statements of informants
D: holding corroboration of named informants statements some of which included suspects hearsay enhanced informants reliability
A.