With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". minimum of 15 years’ (or 180 months’) imprisonment. Mr. McGowan does not challenge the four underlying offenses that led to his classification as an armed career criminal. Br. of Appellant at 3-4. Instead, he asserts that the ACCA enhancement was unconstitutional because (1) the district court used Shepard documents to determine whether his predicate offenses occurred on separate occasions and (2) the government did not allege that he had three or more predicate offenses in the indictment or prove the facts of those offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. Mr. McGowan concedes that his arguments are foreclosed by binding circuit and Supreme Court precedent, but raises the issues only to preserve them for further review. See United States v. Overstreet, 713 F.3d 627, 635 (11th Cir. 2013) (<HOLDING>) (citations omitted); Almendarez-Torres v.

A: holding that inquiry under the acca to determine statutory elements of prior conviction is limited to judicial records and may not include documents that simply state facts such as police reports
B: holding categorical approach to determine whether a prior conviction qualifies as a violent felony for acca purposes raises no sixth amendment issue
C: holding that defendants sixth amendment right to trial by a jury was not violated by district courts reliance on his prior convictions for purposes of sentencing under the acca even though convictions were neither charged in indictment nor admitted
D: holding that a district court may review shepard documents to determine the factual nature of prior convictions for acca purposes including whether they were committed on different occasions
D.