With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". tends to invade the privacy of others.” S.C.Code. Ann. § 16-17-470(A) (2003). “Peep” has been defined alternatively as “to look cautiously or slyly; a brief look: glance; a furtive look.” Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary 867 (9th ed.1990). There is clearly evidence that Caldwell peeped at each of the young victims’ privates. Finally, even if we were to assume arguendo subsection (D) of the statute applied, we find there is evidence Caldwell did intentionally look at the privates of the three young victims for more than just a brief period of time in other than a casual or cursory manner. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing reasons, we find no reversible error in the trial court’s refusal to sever the trials, denial of Caldwell’s motion to suppress th 17 S.E.2d 92, 93 (1992), (<HOLDING>). 5 . Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct.

A: holding in camera hearing was needed to determine whether the incourt identification was of independent origin or was the tainted product of the circumstances surrounding a bond hearing where a witness saw a suspect at a bond hearing prior to his incourt identification of the suspect and the witness may have gotten a fix on the suspect at the bond hearing
B: holding that the bond was intended to and did substantially comply with sjection 71323 therefore because its conditions were not broader and more protective than the statute required the contention that the bond was a common law bond failed
C: holding that witness had an independent basis to support incourt identification where the description made prior to any pretrial identification was substantially an accurate description of the defendant
D: holding when the defendant timely objected to an incourt identification by an eyewitness the trial judge should have directed the government to provide an outofcourt lineup or other protective procedure to avoid an impermissibly suggestive incourt identification
A.