With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". we must first address a procedural matter. It is the State’s contention that the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure rather than the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, controls the disposition of appellant’s first point of error. At the time of appellant’s guilty plea, Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 40.09 controlled the appellate process as to the record on appeal and therefore, the State contends, it should be followed in this appeal. The State asserts that Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 40.09 limits the appellate record to all matters developed at the trial, thereby precluding testimony from the evidentiary hearing ordered by the Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Farris v. State, 712 S.W.2d 512, 515 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (<HOLDING>). We disagree with the State’s assertion that

A: holding that all related matters must be arbitrated
B: holding under code of criminal procedure record refers to all matters developed at trial
C: holding that criminal defendant was not entitled to a jury trial on the issue of restitution under the oregon vehicle code
D: holding that amendments to procedure apply to both pending and future matters
B.