With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". whether [Ms.] Rittenhouse acted with deliberate indifference. [Mr. Sparks] merely alleges that his medical condition was treated differently by different medical personnel.” Id. The magistrate judge recommended that Mr. Sparks’s complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, because his “allegations, at most, accuse [Ms.] Rittenhouse of negligence in failing to timely notify [Mr. Sparks] that Colorado Access denied his recommended surgery.” Id. at 5. The magistrate judge also recommended that the October Motion to Amend be denied as moot. Mr. Sparks filed objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendations, reiterating his previous claims and thereby preserving them for appeal. Cf. Sealock v. Colorado, 218 F.3d 1205, 1209 (10th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). The objections discussed the factual

A: holding that failure to object to magistrate judges recommendation waived issue on appeal
B: holding an argument waived on appeal for failure to raise the issue in objection to the magistrates recommendation
C: holding that under current eleventh circuit rule the failure to object limits the scope of our appellate review to plain error review of the magistrate judges factual findings  however failure to object to the magistrate judges legal conclusions does not preclude the party from challenging those conclusions on appeal
D: holding failure to timely object to magistrate judges recommendation waives appellate review of factual and legal questions
A.