With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". shares were bought in [those accounts]. And also, it's part of [their] Edge Act jurisdiction, [they’re] specifically alleging that [their claims] come[ ] out of the transaction of their banking relationship.’’) (Mr. Membiela, counsel for Defendants). 127 . Phillips, 494 F.3d at 384. 128 . Direct Mail Prod. Servs. Ltd. v. MBNA Corp., No. 99 Civ. 10550, 2000 WL 1277597, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2000) (citing In re Lloyd’s Am. Trust Fund Lit., 954 F.Supp. 656, 670 (S.D.N.Y.1997)). 129 . Roby, 996 F.2d at 1358 (alterations in original). 130 . Id. at 1359 (quoting 4 Arthur L. Corbin, Corbin on Contracts § 776, at 18 (3d ed.1967)). 131 . Direct Mail, 2000 WL 1277597, at *3 (quoting Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285, 1299 (11th Cir.1998)). Accord Roby, 996 F.2d at 1358 (<HOLDING>). 132 . See SBT Terms & Conditions, Attachment

A: holding that a permissive forum selection clause containing a waiver of any claims of forum non conveniens amounts to a mandatory forum selection clause at least where the plaintiff chose the designated forum
B: holding that forum selection clause contained in contracts between lloyds and its investors applied to investors securities fraud claims against the syndicates that competed for investments within lloyds in light of the broad language of the clause and the syndicates pecuniary interest in uniform resolution of the claims
C: holding that under federal law the party seeking to obviate the forum selection clause must prove that the inclusion of the clause was the result of fraud or coercion  fraud in the inducement as to the entire contract is not enough
D: holding that the forum selection clause at issue encompassed both contract and tort claims
B.