With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". portion of the award”). 20 . See 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2815 & nn. 2-3 (2008) (citing Kennon v. Gilmer, 131 U.S. 22, 9 S.Ct. 696, 33 L.Ed. 110 (1889)); DeCenteno v. Gulf Fleet Crews, Inc., 798 F.2d 138, 142 (5th Cir.1986); Matador Drilling Co. v. Post, 662 F.2d 1190, 1198 (5th Cir.1981); see also Hetzel v. Prince William County, 523 U.S. 208, 211, 118 S.Ct. 1210, 140 L.Ed.2d 336 (1998) (finding that a “Court of Appeals' writ of mandamus, requiring the District Court to enter judgment for a lesser amount than that determined by the jury without allowing petitioner the option of a new trial, cannot be squared with the Seventh Amendment.”) (citing Kennon, 131 U.S. at 29-30, 9 S.Ct. 696); Sloane v. Equifax Info. Sens., 510 F.3d 495, 503 (4th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>); Bisbal-Ramos v. City ofMayaguez, 467 F.3d 16,

A: holding that when compensatory damages are nominal a much higher ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages can be contemplated
B: holding that the record supported the district courts award of damages
C: holding that the seventh amendment precludes an appellate court from replacing an award of compensatory damages with one of the courts own choosing
D: holding that the court will not parse the record for evidence of compensatory or nominal damage to justify an award of punitive damages only
C.