With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the FLSA and Nebraska law. See Filing No. 186—Brief p. 10. Furthermore, the plaintiffs contend their state law claims do not “stand as an obstacle” to implementation of the federal law, particularly where the FLSA contains a savings clause, which explicitly allows states to provide for more beneficial minimum wages and maximum work week hours. Id. at 11-12. Under these circumstances, the plaintiffs assert only state laws providing less beneficial minimum wages and maximum work week hours are preempted. Id. at 18. The parties each cite cases that support their respective positions, indicating the area of law is unsettled. In fact, only two circuit courts of appeal have reviewed the issue, with divergent results. See Anderson v. Sara Lee Corp., 508 F.3d 181, 192-95 (4th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>); Williamson v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 208 F.3d

A: holding under flsa
B: holding that the flsa preempted plaintiffs fraud claim
C: holding state law fraud and deceit claims to be preempted
D: holding flsa enforcement scheme preempted contract negligence and fraud claims
D.