With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". vehicle, he placed them directly outside the vehicle and then moved them an unusual distance away from the car and attempted to limit his consent to a search of the bags alone. Reasonable suspicion is a less exacting standard than probable cause. People v. Smith, 13 P.3d 300, 304 (Colo.2000). This reduced standard requires only an objectively reasonable suspicion on the part of trained law enforcement officers that the " 'facts known to the officer [at the time of the encounter], [when] taken together with rational inferences from these facts, createl ] a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity'" People v. Sutherland, 886 P.2d 681, 686 (Colo.1994) (quoting People v. Thomas, 660 P.2d 1272, 1274 (Colo.1983); alterations in Sutherland ), Outlaw v. People, 17 P.3d 150, 157 (Colo.2001) (<HOLDING>). - Courts must be deferential to a law

A: recognizing that totality of circumstances must be considered in determining permissible inferences
B: holding that to justify detention of a criminal suspect the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which taken together with rational inferences from those facts reasonably warrant that intrusion
C: holding that al trial court must take into account the totality of the cireumstances known to police officers at the time of the intrusion combined with any rational inferences therefrom
D: holding that an investigatory stop must be supported by specific and articulable facts which taken together with rational inferences from those facts reasonably warrant that intrusion
C.