With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". may have violated the MVI-SA’s disclosure provisions. As noted above, retail sellers in Texas are required to disclose to a consumer a payment schedule, including the number, amounts, and timing of payments scheduled to repay the obligation. Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 348.009; see also 12 C.F.R. § 226.18. The underlying lawsuit alleges, among other things, that Wink “charg[ed] more periodic payments than required to pay off the loan.” By disclosing a payment schedule that instructed its customers to make more periodic payments than they were obligated to make, Wink arguably made an inaccurate or misleading disclosure to its customers. When a seller discloses the required terms relating to a transaction, it must do so accurately. See Roberts v. Fleet Bank, 342 F.3d 260, 266 (3rd Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>); Smith v. Chapman, 614 F.2d 968, 977 (5th

A: holding creditors must accurately disclose the federal tilas requirements
B: holding that the federal action at issue must be authorized
C: holding that the federal register notice requirements do not apply to federal criminal statutes
D: holding that the requirements of title iii apply and must be satisfied
A.