With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". bodily injury arising out of a street fight. We leave for another day the question whether consent may be a defense to assault in contexts such as official or unofficial sporting events, or whether such acts even are properly considered assaults. III. C r. 1, 753 P.2d 1052, 1072 (1988) (en banc) ("Voluntary mutual combat outside the rules of sport is a breach of the peace, mutual consent is no justification, and both participants are guilty of criminal assault. Thus, where the prosecution’s evidence shows a jailhouse scuffle, the scene as witnessed does not suggest defendant may have been acting in self-defense, and defendant presents no evidence in mitigation, a finding of criminal assault is justified.”) (citation omitted); State v. Weber, 137 Wash.App. 852, 155 P.3d 947, 951 (2007) (<HOLDING>); People v. Reckers, 251 Ill.App.3d 790, 191

A: holding that a reference to the violent crime sentencing statute in the second degree assault statute required automatic imposition of violent crime sentencing for a defendant convicted of second degree assault
B: holding that consent is not a defense to the charge of second degree assault where the assault occurred in the context of a prison fight between inmates
C: holding that consent to participate in the initiation into a prison gang is not a defense to the charge of battery
D: holding that counsel was deficient when he failed to object to error in jury charge referring to aggravated assault when the charge was assault on a public servant
B.