With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in 1945, leaving a “debris field” of exploded and unexploded ordnance and chemical contamination on and under the surface. The harm for which the Cannons now seek to recover damages is the exact same harm which their grandfather, Jesse F. Cannon, incurred in 1945 and which their father, Dr. J. Floyd Cannon, “inherited” in 1954. Despite the Cannons’ contrary assertion, the fact that dangerous ordnance and contamination remain on the Cannons’ property is irrelevant in characterizing the nature of the Government’s tort under Utah law. The harm that existed in 1945 is the harm that exists now. The Cannons do not suggest and nothing in the record supports the proposition that contamination or ordnance continues to enter or migrate onto the Cannons’ property. Compare Hoery, 324 F.3d at 1221 (<HOLDING>). The Government’s failure to remove ordnance

A: recognizing allegation that chemical contamination continued to migrate onto plaintiffs property and enter groundwater and soil
B: recognizing that coverage could be triggered by need to prevent imminent contamination of groundwater
C: holding groundwater contamination is continuous process in which the property damage is evenly distributed over the period of time from the first contamination to the end of the last triggered policy
D: holding that property damage occurred when mold contamination first manifested
A.