With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". because the interrogating officers allegedly threatened her that “should she not say anything than [sic] she would receive the ‘Death Penalty’” and “yelled” at her “until she was hysterically crying.” Petitioner’s C.P.L. § 440.10 Motion at Point 2. The motion court denied this claim based on the mandatory procedural rule set forth in C.P.L. § 440.10(2)(c), finding that “[sufficient facts appear in the record to have permitted review of [this] issue[] on direct appeal.” C.P.L. § 440.10 Order at 3. Because Petitioner failed to raise the evidentiary issue before the Appellate Division, the motion court found, she was “not entitled to collateral review[.]” Id. (citing N.Y. CRIM. Proo. Law § 440.10(2)(c)); People v. Cooks, 67 N.Y.2d 100, 103, 500 N.Y.S.2d 503, 491 N.E.2d 676 (N.Y.1986) (<HOLDING>). As noted above in this Decision and Order,

A: holding that dismissal of claim attacking sufficiency of a plea allocution by defendants failure to preserve the issue otherwise available on direct appeal for such review
B: holding that the defendants oral motion challenging the venire was insufficient to preserve the issue for review
C: holding that defendants failure to appeal the voluntariness of a plea constitutes waiver of the issue on subsequent appeal
D: holding a general ruling by the trial court is insufficient to preserve a specific issue for appellate review
A.