With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". which, in respects other than those stated in Clause (a), falls short of the standard to which the reasonable man should conform in order to protect himself from harm. The Dormans argue that the evidence does not support the type of contributory negligence described in paragraph (a). However, paragraph (a) is inapplicable to the facts. Rather, we think the evidence here presents a situation that fits squarely into paragraph (b). See Peavler, 557 N.E.2d at 1081 (“It is sufficient if the injury resulting from [plaintiffs] failure to exercise ordinary care is such as was usual and therefore might have been expected.”). Accordingly, we conclude that the ev .2d 81 (U.S.Ill.1978); Mitchell Engineering Co., A Div. of CECO Corp. v. Summit Realty Co., 647 S.W.2d 130, 141-42 (Mo.App.1982) (<HOLDING>); Purgess v. Sharrock, 33 F.3d 134, 143-44 (2nd

A: holding that it is generally sufficient that an indictment set forth the offense in the words of the statute itself
B: holding that summits adoption of the facts set forth in mitchells brief was admissible
C: holding that plea in bar may be based only on grounds set forth in statute
D: holding that the pleading standard set forth in twombly applies to all civil actions
B.