With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". . See Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Assocs. Transps., Ino., 1973 OK 62, ¶ 36, 512 P.2d 137, 142 ("Only one cause of action accrued to plaintiff as a result of property damages and personal injuries resulting from the accident, and therefore, plaintiff had no right to maintain an independent action asserting its subrogation rights against Associates prior to the time assured executed the release.” (citations omitted)); see also Mosby, 1997 OK 93, ¶ 9, 943 P.2d at 595 (acknowledging that subrogated insurer's cause of action, where damage to insured arose from automobile accident, is a cause in negligence despite the fact that tortfeasor's negligent conduct was directed at insured rather than insurer). 23 . See Lowder v. Okla. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 1967 OK 245, ¶¶ 18-20, 436 P.2d 654, 658 (<HOLDING>). 24 . C & C Tile Co., 1972 OK 137, ¶ 23, 503

A: recognizing the cause of action
B: recognizing cause of action
C: recognizing that the insured and his subrogated insurer were seeking to recover damages arising from the same cause of action and thus holding that they may not split their claims into separate actions
D: holding that insured may recover attorneys fees from insurer where insurer acts in bad faith
C.