With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the jury.’ Kirsch v. State, 357 S.W.3d 645, 651 (Tex.Crim.App.2012) (quoting Tex. Code Crim. Proo, art. 36.14). “We have generally held that, if a jury-charge instruction ‘is not derived from the [penal] code, it is not ‘applicable law” under art. 36.14.” Id. (quoting Walters v. State, 247 S.W.3d 204, 214 (Tex.Crim.App.2007)). “Texas Government Code § 311.011 provides that statutorily undefined words and phrases shall be ‘construed according to the rules of grammar and common usage.’ ” Id. at 650 (quoting Tex. Gov’t. Code Ann. § 311.011 (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). Normally, in looking at jury charge error, the instructions must be construed as a whole and not by isolated extracts, excerpts, or paragraphs. See Smith v. State, 959 S.W.2d 1, 27 (Tex.App.—Waco 1997, pet. ref'd) (<HOLDING>); see also Joseph v. State, No. 13-11-00461-CR,

A: holding that although portion of trial courts jury charge was inapplicable any error in providing it was harmless in light of the fact that charge considered as a whole was not likely to confuse or mislead the jury
B: holding that whether a jury charge comments on weight of evidence is determined by looking at the jury charge as a whole not isolated statements
C: holding that jury charge in juvenile case warranted fundamentalerror review and analyzing whether charge violated due process
D: holding appellate courts must consider the trial courts jury charge as a whole
B.