With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a close fit between those activities and Ms. Byrd’s termination. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is Affirmed. Concurring opinion by Senior Judge SCHWELB at page 713. 1 . There have been some changes in parties and names since the inception of this case. Ms. Byrd died while this appeal was pending. Her counsel filed a motion to substitute for Ms. Byrd the personal representatives of Ms. Byrd’s estate, Lahar Davis and Tauhid Byrd. Pursuant to D.C.App. R. 43(a), we grant the motion and amend the caption accordingly, but, for simplicity's sake, we refer to the arguments made by Ms. Byrd as her arguments. Community Alternatives was known as VOCA Corporation of Washington, D.C., at the time it employed Ms. Quarles and Ms. Byrd. For consistency, we r , 1080 (D.C.1998) (<HOLDING>); Freas v. Archer Servs., Inc., 716 A.2d 998,

A: holding that plaintiff had sufficiently pled requisite public policy and a close fit where he alleged that his company had fired him after he filed a statutorily authorized lawsuit meant to protect employees against employers who illegally deducted money from their paychecks
B: holding that a plaintiff can show that she is qualified by presenting credible evidence that she continued to possess the objective qualifications she held when she was hired
C: holding that plaintiff director of security for a hospital had sufficiently pled requisite public policy and a close fit where he asserted that a hospital fired him for reporting to law enforcement that a hospital administrator bribed a public official
D: holding that plaintiff cook at a nursing home had sufficiently pled requisite public policy and a close fit where she alleged she was fired for expressing concerns that a fellow employee was contaminating the area where she was preparing food
D.