With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". any of the allegedly false statements were actually false ... [,] nor does it add an inference of scienter.” (quoting In re Hutchinson Tech., Inc. Secs. Litig., 536 F.3d 952, 962 (8th Cir.2008))). Defendants cannot be held liable for not preempting the SEC process and issuing a public confession. See City of Pontiac Policemen’s & Firemen’s Ret. Sys. v. UBS AG, 752 F.3d 173, 184 (2d Cir.2014) (rejecting argument that “in addition to disclosing the existence of an investigation, defendants were required to disclose that [defendant] UBS was, in fact, engaged in an ongoing tax evasion scheme,” because “disclosure is not a rite of confession”). The question remains whether Plaintiffs have pleaded fraudulent omissions of facts foreseeably giving rise to F .Supp. 668, 674-75 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (<HOLDING>). Here, four of the FCPA-related statements

A: holding for  2241 purposes that  2255 is inadequate or ineffective only if the remedy itself is infirm not because of the movants failure to use it or to prevail under it
B: holding that an arranger must have owned or possessed or had the authority to control or duty to dispose of  the hazardous materials at issue
C: holding an issuer is under no duty to announce publicly that it or its officers are guilty of uncharged criminal behavior or to accuse itself of antisocial or illegal policies
D: holding that the elements of a claim under  3729a2 are 1 that the defendant made used or caused to be made or used a record or statement to get a claim against the united states paid or approved 2 the record or statement and the claim were false or fraudulent and 3 the defendant knew that the record or statement and the claim were false or fraudulent emphasis added
C.