With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". On March 11, 1994, Appellant filed its Notice of Appeal of that ruling to the Eleventh Circuit. Therefore, the only issue properly before this Court, and the only issue this Court will consider in this Appeal, is whether the Bankruptcy Court was acting within its jurisdiction when it entered the December 2,1993, Amended Final Judgment of Default. The Court finds that the Bankruptcy Court was not acting without jurisdiction and that the whole issue is essentially moot at this point anyway. A. Bankruptcy Court Did Not Act Without Jurisdiction Appellant submits that the Bankruptcy Court’s jurisdiction ceased when Appellant filed his Notice of Appeal of the March 31,1993, Order Amending Final Judgment of Default. See In the Matter of Urban Dev., Ltd., 42 B.R. 741 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Fla.1984) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, Appellant argues, the Bankruptcy

A: holding that a lower court should not take any action once appeal is filed which would interfere with the appeal process or with the appellate courts jurisdiction
B: holding that intermediate appellate courts have jurisdiction to address merits of appeal when amended notice of appeal is filed before briefs are filed
C: recognizing that a court is without jurisdiction to issue an injunction which would interfere with the rights of those who are not parties to the action
D: holding that an appeal is perfected when the appeal bond is filed
A.