With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". procedures if he or she commits prohibited conduct. Further, “[a] conspiracy claim ... requires allegations of specific facts tending to show a ‘meeting of the minds’ among the. alleged conspirators.” Murray v. Lene, 595 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir.2010); Rogers v. Bruntrager, 841 F.2d 853, 856 (8th Cir.1988); Brown v. Dills, No. 05-4414-CV-C-NKL, 2007 WL 148851, at *3 (W.D.Mo. Jan. 12, 2007). “[T]he plaintiff must allege with particularity and specifically demonstrate with material facts that the defendants reached an agreement.” Davis, 685 F.3d at 684. “Conclusory allegations of conspiracy fail to state a claim.” Brown, 2007 WL 148851, at *3 (citing Swelling v. Westhoff 972 F.2d 199, 200 (8th Cir.1992)); see, e.g., Quintero Cmty. Ass’n Inc. v. F.D.I.C., 792 F.3d 1002, 1011 (8th Cir.2015) (<HOLDING>). Plaintiff’s complaint states Defendants

A: holding conclusory assertions of intent to cause insufficient without supporting facts
B: holding that conclusory and speculative assertions that an agreement existed between the defendants to accomplish vaguely pleaded torts was insufficient to support a civil conspiracy claim
C: holding unobjectedto conclusory testimony insufficient to support judgment
D: holding that testimony was both speculative and conclusory
B.