With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to the marital communications privilege for an offense against a child of either spouse to promote marital and family harmony); United States v. Bahe, 128 F.3d 1440, 1446 (10th Cir. 1997) (upholding admission of spousal testimony and finding “no significant difference, as a policy matter, between a crime against a child of the married couple, against a stepchild living in the home or, as here, against an eleven-year-old relative visiting in the home” because “child abuse is a horrendous crime”); United States v. White, 974 F.2d 1135, 1138 (9th Cir. 1992) (upholding admission of spousal testimony because exclusion of such testimony is inconsistent with public policy concerns to protect a spouse or the spouse’s children) ; United States v. Cameron, 556 F.2d 752, 755 (5th Cir. 1977) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Allery, 526 F.2d 1362, 1367

A: recognizing a childabuse exception to marital communications privilege
B: holding that marital communications which arise from an act of violence by a spouse committed against the children of either spouse should constitute an exception to the marital privilege because such communications fail to satisfy the conditions underlying the creation of the privilege
C: holding that the initial disclosure of a crime to one spouses without more is covered by the marital communications privilege
D: recognizing privilege
A.