With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". credibility about a battered woman, we find the court’s evidential ruling unduly restrictive. 9 We note that several jurisdictions have found battered woman syndrome evidence to be admissible for certain purposes in respect of a claim of duress. See, e.g., United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1287-88 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943, 113 S.Ct. 1345, 122 L.Ed.2d 727 (1993); United States v. Marenghi, 893 F.Supp. 85, 92-96 (D.Me.1995), aff'd, 109 F,3d 28 (1st Cir.1997); United States v. Brown, 891 F.Supp. 1501, 1508 (D.Kan.1995); Romero, supra, 13 Cal.Rptr.2d at 338-39, rev’d on other grounds, 8 Cal.4th 728, 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 270, 883 P.2d 388 (1994); State v. Williams, 132 Wash.2d 248, 937 P.2d 1052, 1058 (1997). See also Dunn v. Roberts, 963 F.2d 308, 313-14 (10th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Johnson, 956 F.2d 894, 898

A: holding that the title of legislation is relevant to legislative intent
B: holding that the relevant intent is not the intent to return ultimately but the intent to return to the united states within a relatively short period
C: holding that a lawyer is a necessary witness where the lawyers testimony is relevant to disputed material questions of fact and where there is no other evidence available to prove those facts
D: holding battered woman syndrome evidence relevant when defendants intent is disputed
D.