With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Bolton’s qualified immunity defense has not been overcome, Millennium has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. MSJ Response at 18. The City, however, misapprehends the doctrine of qualified immunity. “[Qualified immunity is not a defense to [a plaintiffs] claims for declaratory and injunctive relieff.]” See Yates v. Stalder, 217 F.3d 332, 333, n. 2 (5th Cir.2000). Furthermore, Bolton is being sued in his official capacity, not as an individual, to enjoin him from acting as directed by a Dallas City ordinance. In actions against public officials in their official capacities, the doctrine of qualified immunity plays no part, prohibiting neither the grant of injunctive relief, nor the award of attorney’s fees. See Jackson v. Galan, 868 F.2d 165, 168 (5th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>); see also Monell v. Department of Social

A: holding police officer is a public official
B: holding that attorneys fees may be awarded against a public official even when the official is immune from money damages
C: holding that where a public official takes discretionary action that the official knows will directly benefit a financial interest that the official has concealed in violation of a state criminal law that official has deprived the public of his honest services under  1346
D: holding that punitive damages are not recoverable against a state official sued in his or her official capacity
B.