With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in § 3662. To the contrary, the PAEA added specific, additional types of claims to the jurisdictional provision of § 3662, including claims arising under § 404a. The fact that § 409 of the PAEA generally grants jurisdiction over actions brought against USPS does not change this conclusion. Indeed, § 409 specifically states that its grant of jurisdiction to the district courts does not apply to exceptions “otherwise provided in this title.” 39 U.S.C. § 409(a). Section 3662, with its grant of jurisdiction to the PRC over claims arising under § 404a, provides such an exception. Thus, the district court correctly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider claims arising under § 404a. See Anselma Crossing, L.P. v. U.S. Postal Serv., 637 F.3d 238, 246 (3d Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>). In granting USPS’s motion to dismiss, the

A: holding that a laterenacted and specific statutory provision bars district court jurisdiction for contract claims against usps despite  409s general grant of jurisdiction
B: holding that court of claims has jurisdiction over actions for breach of standard contract
C: holding that igras specific grant of federal jurisdiction for certain actions indicates congress intended to limit federal jurisdiction to those instances
D: holding that district court did not have jurisdiction over any claims that could not exist independently of a contract
A.