With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". provisions of § 3501(c) are subject to the voluntariness test in § 3501(a) and (b). Id. at 219 n. 6 (citing Gov’t of the V.I. v. Gereau, 502 F.2d 914, 924 (3d Cir.1974)). The court stated that the Supreme Court’s opinion in Dickerson held that § 3501 was without effect “ to the extent that it could be read as overruling Miranda.” Id. at 210. 4 . Some circuits have held that there is no duty to hold a hearing on the voluntariness of a confession absent an objection by the defendant. See United States v. Wilson, 895 F.2d 168, 172-73 (4th Cir.1990) (finding no requirement for court to hold hearing under § 3501(a) without an objection, but noting that the evidence did not compel the conclusion that the confession was involuntary); United States v. Hart, 729 F.2d 662, 666 (10th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>). We are, of course, bound by our own

A: holding that the issue of the voluntariness of a settlement agreement is waived on appeal if not raised before the board
B: holding that the evidence raised the issue of voluntariness of consent even though the officers comments were in response to an inquiry by the suspect
C: holding that the trial court need not hold a voluntariness hearing where the defendant did not object and no evidence presented raised the issue
D: holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal
C.