With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". stamp. The State argued that this fact made the article and photo in the September 18 paper irrelevant. In response, Mr. Schaefer pointed out that the victim could have seen the photo on either September 16 or 17. However, when Mr. Schaefer could produce nothing to show that Plott’s photo was in any paper other than the September 18 edition, the trial court denied the motion to suppress without hearing any evidence. In his rule 3.850 motion, Plott argued that Mr. Schae-fer was ineffective for failing to obtain all of the newspaper articles and for failing to bring them to the hearing. In summarily denying relief on this ground, the trial court held that this issue was procedurally barred because it was raised on direct appeal. See Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Fla.1995) (<HOLDING>). However, the issue raised on direct appeal

A: holding that a caldwell claim is procedurally barred if it is not raised on direct appeal
B: holding that defendants 3850 motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred as successive where the defendants current rule 3850 motion is one that could have or should have been raised in his first rule 3850 motion
C: holding that the caldwell claim is procedurally barred because it could have been raised on direct appeal but was not
D: holding that claims raised on direct appeal are procedurally barred from consideration in a rule 3850 motion
D.