With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Agent Alfin stated that had he been aware of the change to the homepage prior to the submission of the Affidavit later on February 20, 2015, he would have taken steps to ensure that the description of the homepage in the Affidavit was updated to reflect the change.” Id. The Court does not decide whether Agent Alfin noticed the new logo or whether, if he had noticed it during the early morning hours of February 20, he was reckless in failing to relay that information to Agent Macfarlane before the search warrant application was submitted later that same morning. The Court need not address this issue because, even if Agent Alfin’s conduct constituted recklessness, the new logo would not have changed the probable cause analysis. See Matish, 193 F.Supp.3d at 606, 2016 WL 3545776, at *12 (<HOLDING>); Darby, 190 F.Supp.3d at 534, 2016 WL 3189703,

A: holding in a paternity action that the selection and change of the childs surname from the name chosen by the mother must be based on the trial courts determination that renaming is in the childs best interests and the record must affirmatively show such a name change is required for the welfare of the minor child
B: holding that in determining whether a crime is a continuing offense the court must focus on the nature of the substantive offense and not on the specific characteristics of the conduct in the case at issue
C: holding that the logo change lacks significance because the probable cause rested not solely on the sites logo but also on the affiants description that the entire site was dedicated to child pornography playpens suggestive name the affirmative steps a user must take to locate playpen the sites repeated warnings and focus on anonymity and the actual contents of the site
D: holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in changing the surname of the child where the court made factual findings that the name change would be in the best interest of the child
C.