With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". exception to the spousal testimonial privilege akin to that we recognized in United States v. Bahe, 128 F.3d 1440 (10th Cir.1997). In Bahe, we recognized an exception to the marital communications privilege for voluntary spousal testimony relating to child abuse within the household. Federal courts recognize two marital privileges: the first is the testimonial privilege which permits one spouse to decline to testify against the other during marriage; the second is the marital confidential communications privilege, which either spouse may assert to prevent the other from testifying to confidential communications made during marriage. See Trammel, 445 U.S. at 44-46, 100 S.Ct. 906; Bahe, 128 F.3d at 1442; see also Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 11, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337 (1996) (<HOLDING>). In order to accept the government’s

A: recognizing justification of marital testimonial privilege as modified by trammel because it furthers the important public interest in marital harmony
B: recognizing a childabuse exception to marital communications privilege
C: holding income tax liability incurred during marriage is one of accepted costs of producing marital income and should be treated as marital debt for purposes of determining equitable distribution of marital estate
D: holding that separate property may become marital property if spouse donates it to marital unit with intent at time of donation that property become marital
A.