With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Pursuant to section 7(a)(2) of the VCAA, that amendment to section 5107(a) is applicable to “any claim ... filed before the date of the enactment of [the VCAA] and not final as of that date.” VCAA § 7(a). The VCAA also amended 38 U.S.C. § 5103 (“Notice to claimants of required information and evidence”) and added 38 U.S.C. § 5103A (“Duty to assist claimants”). VCAA § 3(a). The appellant argues that the September 2000 BVA decision should be vacated and the matter remanded for readjudication in light of the enactment of the VCAA. Appellant’s Brief (Br.) at 3-4. Specifically, he argues that the VCAA “significantly modified] the provisions of chapter 51 of [title 38 of the United States Code], which addresses ‘claims, effective dates, and payments’ ” and that, because the 001) (en banc) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, because the appellant’s VCAA

A: holding that cue existed in ro decision that had reduced veterans benefits where court found that it is evident that cue existed therein
B: holding that cue motion is not claim for benefits and that vcaa definition of claimant cannot encompass person seeking revision of final decision based on cue
C: holding that prior ro decision that had not become final was not subject to cue collateral attack
D: holding vcaa inapplicable to claim that ro decision contained cue
B.