With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 233 F.Supp.2d 319, 327 (D.Conn.2002) (adopting the Mathews approach wit 447, 451 (5th Cir.1995); Cooper v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 19 F.3d 562, 566-67 (11th Cir.1994); Quinn, 14 F.3d at 652-55 (D.C.Cir.); United States ex rel. Precision Co. v. Koch Indus. Inc., 971 F.2d 548, 552-53 (10th Cir.1992). 74 . See Mathews, 166 F.3d at 863 (7th Cir.); Siller, 21 F.3d at 1348 (4th Cir.); LeBlanc II, 874 F.Supp. at 40-41 (D.Mass.); LaValley, 707 F.Supp. at 1366-67 (D.Mass.). 75 . Siller, 21 F.3d at 1348. 76 . See O’Keeffe, 131 F.Supp.2d at 92. 77 . See id. at 92-93 (adopting the majority view that "based upon” means "similar to” or the "same as”); LeBlanc II, 874 F.Supp. at 41 (suggesting the court's agreement with the minority position); LaValley, 707 F.Supp. at 1366-67 (<HOLDING>). 78 . See Mathews, 166 F.3d at 863; Siller, 21

A: holding that plaintiffs knowledge was not based upon the public disclosures because plaintiffs knowledge was independent of those disclosures
B: holding that harold fine did not have direct and independent knowledge because he did not personally conduct the audits that led to the public disclosures
C: holding that the knowledge requisite to knowing violation of a statute is factual knowledge as distinguished from knowledge of the law
D: holding there was no rule 404b violation where the evidence was admitted to show knowledge and knowledge was an element of the crime charged
A.