With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and waived, as indicated by his initials, reads, “I expressly do not desire to consult with either a civilian lawyer retained by me or a military lawyer appointed as my counsel without cost to me prior to questioning.” Appellant also acknowledged waiver of these rights when questioned by the military judge at trial regarding the written waiver. Furthermore, Appellant acknowledged that his civilian attorney told him not to go into questioning without him and Appellant intentionally ignored that advice. Based on Appellant’s own testimony and actions in reviewing and signing the Article 31, UCMJ, rights form at the time of the interrogation, Appellant waived any right he may have had to have his counsel notified of and be present at the interrogation. See LeMasters, 39 M.J. at 493 (<HOLDING>). The current version of M.R.E. 305(e) does not

A: holding standing cannot be waived and may thus be raised at any time
B: holding that notice to counsel may be waived
C: recognizing that immunity may be waived
D: holding that defenses under rule 60b may be waived
B.