With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), 694 So.2d 184, 187 (“[Wjhen the legislature specifically enumerates a series of things, the legislature’s omission of other items, which could have been easily included in the statute, is deemed intentional.”). Indeed, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that “[b]y its very terms, this provision is limited to district court judgments which are modified or reversed.” Am. Deposit Ins. Co. v. Myles, 0-2457 (La.4/25/01), 783 So.2d 1282, 1285 (Emphasis original). In that case, the supreme court considered a judgment originating from the First City Court of the City of New Orleans and concluded that “by implication, this provision does not apply to city court judgments.” Id. | (¡(Emphasis original). See also Snowton, 6 So.3d at 168-70 (<HOLDING>). Similarly, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit

A: holding art v  8b does not apply to judgments rendered by the office of workers compensation
B: recognizing that res judicata applies to judgments approving workers compensation settlements
C: holding rule does not apply to satisfied conciliationcourt judgments
D: recognizing that a federal court may not review a challenge to a benefits determination of the office of workers compensation programs in the department of labor
A.