With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a separate, pecuniary motive in making the trips, but this argument -was rejected on appeal and is foreclosed by Third Circuit precedent. Id. (explaining that the Government was required to prove only that " 'a significant or motivating purpose' of the trav- ' el was to facilitate the abuse,” and that the evidence was sufficient to support such a finding) (quoting United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004)). 18 . Tr. 128:17-133:19 (11/1/12). 19 . See generally Dierolf v. Thompson, Civil No. 1:CV-11-01999, 2013 WL 2896819, at *20 (M.D. Pa. June 12, 2013) ("Decisions by trial counsel with regard to examination of witnesses are strategic by nature and necessitate a strong level of deference to the attorney’s assessment.”) ( WL 1651270, at *5 (W.D. Tenn. Apr. 14, 2015) (<HOLDING>). 24 . 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v.

A: holding that resentencing is required
B: holding that pepper did not allow petitioner to seek a resentencing under  2255
C: holding that request for resentencing based on pepper was not cognizable in a  2255 proceeding absent a showing of a complete miscarriage of justice
D: holding that constitution and courts jurisdiction allow for twolevel increase on resentencing
B.