With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". limitations clause of an insurance policy violated public policy); Caron, 703 A.2d at 67 (finding that the trial court possessed the authority to consider the public policy issue of whether an insured can issue a policy which insures a company’s vehicles but restricts the extent of an employee’s coverage to when he/she is operating one of those vehicles); Zak v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 713 A.2d 681, 684 (Pa.Super.1998) (finding that the courts could consider whether a clause making an arbitration award binding on the insured if it did not exceed $15,000 was against public policy); Burstein v. Prudential Property and Cas. Ins. Co., 570 Pa. 177, 182, 809 A.2d 204, 206 (2002) (stating that the court possessed the authority to consider whe r. 659, 663 A.2d 166, 169 (1995) (<HOLDING>); Prudential Property and Casualty Ins. Co. v.

A: holding that an arbitration award involving the appellants challenge to the failure of the insurance company to ensure that he had read and understood a signed waiver and to attach the waiver to the insurance policy as contrary to public policy is not reviewable by the courts because there is no challenge to a provision or term of the policy the appellant never claimed that the waiver or policy language itself was contrary to the public policy of this commonwealth
B: holding that the trial court not the arbitrator must decide a challenge to an arbitration provision based on public policy
C: holding that the plain meaning of the uim policy language was clear and not contrary to public policy
D: recognizing that production of a written insurance policy was unnecessary to prove the existence of the policy because the proof required was proof of the fact of insurance and not of the contents of a writing
A.