With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the court’s refusal in this case to instruct the jury on that doctrine. We decline to do so. Maryland Rule 4-325(c) requires the trial court to give a requested instruction under the following circumstances: “(1) the requested instruction is a correct statement of the law; (2) the requested instruction is applicable under the facts of the case; and (3) the content of the requested instruction was not fairly covered elsewhere in the jury instruction actually given.” Ware v. State, 348 Md. 19, 58, 702 A.2d 699 (1997). Moreover, a trial court need not give a requested instruction if the instructions given fairly cover the same subject matter. Binnie v. State, 321 Md. 572, 581-8 tes, 536 U.S. 932, 122 S.Ct. 2608, 153 L.Ed.2d 794 (2002); United States v. Span, 170 F.3d 798, 801 (7th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862, 120 S.Ct. 153,

A: holding that an agreement on the one side to sell and on the other to buy does not constitute a conspiracy even if the buyer intends to resell the drugs so long as the buyer and seller do not have an agreement to further distribute the drugs
B: holding that conspiracy instruction accurately stated the law and properly emphasized the necessity of finding a conspiratorial agreement even though the instruction omitted defendants requested statement that an agreement between a buyer and seller of illegal drugs does not constitute conspiracy
C: holding that defendant charged with conspiracy to manufacture marijuana and possessing marijuana with intent to distribute was not entitled to specific buyerseller instruction even though support for such instruction existed because court gave a complete instruction reciting all the elements of conspiracy
D: holding that the requested instruction was not required under rule 4325c because even assuming that the requested instruction was a correct statement of law the trial judge exercised his discretion properly
B.