With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 784 So.2d at 1126. As a matter of fact, even conduct consistent with innocent activity can give rise to a reasonable suspicion in support of a Terry-stop when all the circumstances are taken into consideration. Id. (underscoring that innocent, non-criminal, behavior will frequently provide the basis for reasonable suspicion); see also Beahan v. State, 41 So.3d 1000, 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 20 DCA 1988) (“A ‘founded’ suspicion is one which has some factual foundation in the circumstances observed by the officer when those circumstances are interpreted in light of the officer’s knowledge.”) (quoting G.J.P. v. State, 469 So.2d 826, 827 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)). The following factors may be considered by police officers to arrive at a reasonable suspicion that a crime is being or is about A 1990) (<HOLDING>). At that point, Officer Sanchez needed to

A: holding that the encounter between an officer and the defendant did not rise to the level of a terry stop until the defendant gave the officer his license and the officer informed the defendant that he was going to be given a patdown
B: holding that by the time the officer asked the defendant if he could frisk him the encounter had evolved into a stop
C: holding that the return of a defendants drivers license after a traffic stop can convert what was a brief seizure into a consensual encounter even where the officer questions the defendant about criminal activity immediately thereafter
D: holding that probable cause determinations turn on what the officer knew at the time he made the stop
B.