With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the picketing of a freight rail terminal facility under state tort and labor laws. 394 U.S. at 372-77, 89 S.Ct. 1109. The Court concluded that it did not because “the exercise of plenary state authority to curtail or entirely prohibit self-help would frustrate effective implementation of the [RLA’s] processes.” Id. at 380, 8 not falling squarely within either category, see, e.g., Kaufman v. Allied Pilots Ass’n, 274 F.3d 197, 202-03 (5th Cir.2001) (applying Garmon to hold third-party tortious interference claim preempted by RLA); Air Transp. Ass’n of Am. v. City & County of San Francisco, 266 F.3d 1064, 1076 (9th Cir.2001) (noting that “[sjtate laws that frustrate the purpose of the RLA are preempted”); Peterson v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Int'l, 759 F.2d 1161, 1170-71 (4th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>); cf. Delta Air Lines v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d

A: holding that rla preempts state law claim for wrongful discharge even where rla arbitral mechanism not implicated because state claims seek to vindicate rights largely secured by federal law
B: holding that the flsa preempts certain state law claims
C: holding that the plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by federal law
D: holding rla duty of fair representation claim preempts identical state law claims of fraud and deceit
A.