With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". not what Mr. Torres later testified to at trial. See generally, e.g., Bradshaw v. District of Columbia, 43 A.3d 318, 325 (D.C. 2012) (existence of probable cause to arrest is determined based on “information at the moment of arrest”). In any event, even if Mr. Torres did not actually see the gun in the fleeing man’s hands, Mr. Torres did see the man run behind a dumpster and a gun being tossed from behind the dumpster at the same time. Given their close temporal and physical proximity, these circumstances provided probable cause to believe that Mr. Wade had unlawfully possessed the gun, and that was true even before Mr. Torres confirmed that Mr. Wade was the person who had (inferentially) thrown the gun, Cf., e.g., United States v. Franklin, 545 Fed.Appx. 243, 246-47 (4th Cir. 2013) (<HOLDING>). III. Mr. Wade argues that evidence of the

A: holding that police had probable cause to arrest defendant before defendant was identified by victims where victims informed police that two cars had been taken at gunpoint and one of perpetrators was heavyset and wearing striped shirt officers located defendant in vicinity of cars defendant matched description and was disheveled and sweaty and gun was found nearby
B: holding that evidence was sufficient to support convictions for two counts of armed robbery when money was taken from one victims immediate presence at gunpoint and given to second victim and second victim was then forced to surrender the money to defendant at gunpoint
C: holding that evidence was sufficient to prove defendant constructively possessed the gun where although defendant denied ownership of the gun it was found near a knife of which defendant claimed ownership and where defendant was aware of the presence of the gun
D: holding that no valid arrest had taken place before the search of the defendants person was conducted even though prior to that point a police officer had approached the defendant displayed his badge informed the defendant of his suspicions that the defendants luggage contained drug contraband informed the defendant of his constitutional rights and detained the defendant for twenty minutes after he had accompanied the officers to a police office located in the airport
A.