With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". he was likely to receive a similar sentence if he entered an open guilty plea, Appellant pled guilty to the offense and was informed by the trial court that he could impose a sentence of up to fifteen years in state prison. At a later sentencing hearing, rather than imposing a similar or more-lenient sentence, despite the State’s unchanged position in recommending a similar sentence to the trial court, and despite that Appellant, who was then 20 years old, had no felony record, the trial court imposed a sentence of twelve years in state prison. I must join in affirming the denial of relief, because Appellant cannot show that the trial judge would have accepted the two-year prison sentence offered by the State which Appellant rejected. See Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419, 422 (Fla. 2013) (<HOLDING>). But defense counsel ill served Appellant by

A: holding claim that counsel failed to convey a plea offer that was more favorable than the sentence imposed after trial together with an assertion that defendant would have pleaded had he or she known of the offer is facially sufficient
B: holding that a written offer accepted by parol may constitute a sufficient memorandum of the contract provided the person making the offer is the party to be charged
C: holding that to prove ineffectiveness where defendant rejected plea offer upon advice of counsel defendant must show he would have accepted the offer had counsel advised correctly the state would not have withdrawn its offer the court would have accepted the offer and the resulting sentence would have been less severe
D: holding that to demonstrate prejudice resulting from counsels deficient performance that caused a defendant to forgo a favorable plea offer a defendant must show that he would have accepted the offer to plead and that there is a reasonable probability neither the prosecution nor the trial court would have prevented the offer from being accepted or implemented
C.