With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Court attached significance to .the absence of special venue provisions. In United States v. Johnson, 323 U.S. 273, 65 S.Ct. 249, 89 L.Ed. 236 (1944), the Court held that the Federal Denture Act (which prohibited use of the mails for sending dentures made by unlicensed persons) did not create a continuing offense. The Court said : It is significant that when Congress desires to give a choice of trial, it does so by specific venue provisions giving jurisdiction to prosecute in any criminal court of the United States through which a process of wrongdoing moves. . . . The absence of such a provision would in itself be significant. Id. at 276, 65 S.Ct. at 251. 7 . Supra, note 4. See Mahaffey v. Hudspeth. 128 E.2d 940 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 666, 63 S.Ct. 76, 87 L.Ed. 535 (1942) (<HOLDING>). Section 103 was carried over into the 1948

A: holding that when action arising under contract containing venue selection clause is filed in court other than that specified in clause case will be transferred to forum selected by contract unless venue selection clause is unreasonable and unjust or invalid due to fraud or overreaching
B: holding that  103 supplemented special venue clause of xational stolen property act
C: recognizing continuing offense concept to support venue in absence of statute where stolen property was brought into iowa from another state
D: recognizing that special venue statutes are supplemented by the 28 usc  1391 venue provisions applicable to all civil cases
B.