With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". require a stricter standard under federal law than that which the Supreme Court imposed. Third, in this case, Officer Beilis relied in part on an x-ray of the package, which was not available to the officers in either Ramsey or Safari. This x-ray revealed items of greater density than would be expected of similarly shaped items, and given the officer’s extensive experience reviewing x-rays of incoming foreign packages, it is appropriate to afford considerable weight to the officer’s interpretation of this x-ray scan. In all, the totality of the circumstances here supports Officer Beilis’s conclusion that reasonable cause existed to suspect that the package contained unlawfully imported contraband. Cf. Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 701, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) (<HOLDING>). As such, the search of the package in this

A: holding that a totality of circumstances standard was proper for determining probable cause for issuance of a search warrant based on information from an informant
B: holding reasonable suspicion is based on totality of circumstances
C: holding this framework applies whether the traffic stop is based on probable cause or reasonable suspicion
D: recognizing that district courts finding of reasonable suspicion or probable cause based on the totality of the circumstances is ordinarily accorded deference
D.