With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 461, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997); O'Hara v. Gen. Motors Corp., 508 F.3d 753, 760-61 (5th Cir.2007). 4 . Section 560.2(a); Lending and Investment, 61 Fed. Reg. at 50966-67. 5 . The categories of state laws include contract and commercial law, real property law, certain homestead laws, tort law, and criminal law. Section 560.2(c). 6 . Section 560.2(c); Lending and Investment, 61 Fed. Reg. at 50966-67. 7 . Although no court of appeals has considered whether a similar state law is preempted by HOLA, our reading is in line with that of a number of district courts that have found preemption for similar state laws under these subsections and under Section 560.2(b)(5) and (10). See Ngoc Nguyen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 749 F.Supp.2d 1022, 1033 (N.D.Cal.2010) (<HOLDING>); Plastino v. Wells Fargo Bank, 873 F.Supp.2d

A: holding that californias antislapp statute is applicable in federal court
B: holding that californias search and seizure laws do not apply in a prosecution under the aca
C: holding cercla does not preempt californias corporate capacity statute
D: holding californias similar defaultnotice statute preempted under section 5602b4 5 9 and 10
D.