With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". liberally, particularly in the context of dismissals under § 1915(e)(2)(B), but are given broad discretion in determining when such complaints are frivolous. Macias v. Raul A. (Unknown) Badge No. 153, 23 F.3d 94, 97 (5th Cir.1994). A complaint may not be dismissed under § 1915(d)(2)(B) “simply because the court finds the plaintiffs allegations unlikely.” Jolly v. Klein, 923 F.Supp. 931, 942-43 (S.D.Tex.1996). A civil rights plaintiff must support his claim(s) with specific facts demonstrating a constitutional deprivation and may not simply rely on conclusory allegations. Schultea v. Wood, 47 F.3d 1427, 1433 (5th Cir.1995). Nevertheless, a district court is bound by the allegations in a plaintiffs complaint and is “not free to speculate that the plaintiff ‘might’ be able to state a c (<HOLDING>). In his original complaint, Plaintiff stated

A: holding that contested factual issues in  2255 cases must be decided on the basis of an evidentiary hearing not affidavits
B: holding that an evidentiary hearing may be used to develop the factual basis of a prisoner complaint
C: holding that when a petitioner seeks an evidentiary hearing in state court to develop the factual basis of a claim but the state court denies such a hearing entitlement to a federal court hearing is analyzed pursuant to preaedpa law rather than the standards set out in  2254e2
D: holding federal evidentiary hearing not statutorily barred when petitioner had sought to develop factual basis for claim in state court
B.