With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in this case, that the Zuppos did not specifically name in their complaint the DOT employee who was driving the gra n May 15, 1998 to insert a reference to Title 62. That amendment is irrelevant to the purposes for which we are citing the section in the instant case. 10 . Warnecki v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Auth., 689 A.2d 1023 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1997). 11 .Section 7301(c) of the Emergency Code, 35 Pa.C.S. § 7301(c), in pertinent part, provides as follow: 12 . Section 7301(b) of the Emergency Code provides that “the Governor may issue, amend and rescind executive orders, proclamations and regulations which shall have the force and effect of law.” 35 Pa.C.S. § 7301(b). See also Pennsylvania Department of Health v. North Hills Passavant Hosp., 674 A.2d 1141, 1146 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996) (<HOLDING>) 13 . Section 8550 of what is commonly referred

A: holding that an executive order authorized by statute and intended to implement or supplement that statute has the force of law
B: holding that a court has power to award attorney fees when authorized by contract statute or recognized ground of equity
C: recognizing that under georgia law attorneys fees are allowed where authorized by statute or contract
D: holding that a claim for damages that would invalidate a conviction or sentence that has not already been invalidated or reversed on direct appeal by executive order by an authorized state tribunal or by a writ of habeas corpus is not cognizable under  1983
A.