With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roger Lee Lockamy appeals his conviction and 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2012). We affirm. Lockamy first argues that his sentence is unconstitutional because the indictment did not allege the existence of his prior convictions necessary to support an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2012). As he acknowledges, however, his claim is foreclosed by Supreme Court precedent as well as our own and is thus unavailing. See Alleyne v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 2163-64, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Thompson, 588 F.3d 197, 202

A: holding any fact other than prior conviction that increases statutory mandatory minimum is element of offense that must be submitted to jury and found beyond reasonable doubt
B: holding that other than the fact of a prior conviction any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt
C: holding any fact that increases the mandatory minimum is an element that must be submitted to the jury
D: holding that any fact that increases mandatory minimum is element that must be proved beyond reasonable doubt
A.