With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ” Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 492, 119 S.Ct. 2139, 144 L.Ed.2d 450 (1999) (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j)) (emphasis in original). Because there is no evidence in the record of any other compromised major life activities, we may consider William’s restriction on working more than eight hours a day. According to the regulations, a person’s ability to work is substantially limited for the purposes of the ADA if he or she is “significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in v was not substantially lim that any of his physical impairments rise to the level of a disability under the ADA, he is unable to satisfy the first element of a prima facie case. See Penny v. United Parcel Serv., 128 F.3d 408, 417 (6th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). C. There is insufficient evidence to show

A: holding the plaintiff satisfies the burden of a prima facie case by a preponderance of the evidence
B: holding that a title vii plaintiff need not plead the elements of a mcdonnell douglas prima facie case to survive a motion to dismiss
C: holding that this court need not address the merits of an argument raised for the first time on appeal
D: holding that because the plaintiff was not disabled for the purposes of the ada this court need not to address the other elements of the prima facie case
D.