With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is not vague or over-broad. United States v. Kelly, 314 F.3d 908, 912-13 (7th Cir.2003) (interpreting the holding in Ashcroft to only apply to virtual pornography); United States v. Hersh, 297 F.3d 1233, 1254 n. 31 (11th Cir.2002) (same); see also Fink v. State, 817 A.2d 781, 790 (Del.2003) (same); Perry v. Commonwealth, 438 Mass. 282, 780 N.E.2d 53, 56 n. 4 (2002) (stating that Ashcroft was not at issue because materials depicted actual children). Further, because pornography produced with real children is not a category of speech protected by the First Amendment, the statute’s prohibition of these materials does not violate the First Amendment. Ashcroft, 535 U.S. at 246, 122 S.Ct. at 1399; see also New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 764, 102 S.Ct. 3348, 3358, 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (1982) (<HOLDING>); Savery v. State, 819 S.W.2d 837, 838

A: holding that the first amendment does not protect obscenity or pornography produced with actual children
B: holding that virtual child pornography which did not use images of actual minors was protected expressive speech under the first amendment because it did not harm any real children through its production and continued existence
C: holding that pornography depicting actual children can be prescribed whether or not the images are obscene because of the states interest in protecting the children exploited by the production process
D: holding that the governments interest in the welfare of children embraces not only protecting children from physical abuse but also protecting childrens interest in the privacy and dignity of their homes and in the lawfully exercised authority of their parents
C.