With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit, PER CURIAM: Tracey Lamont Coad pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(e) (2012), and was sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), to 212 months’ imprisonment. Coad appealed, and this Court affirmed the criminal judgment. The Supreme Court of the United States granted Coad’s petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated this Court’s judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015) (<HOLDING>). Coad v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct.

A: holding that imposing an increased sentence under the residual clause of the acca violates the constitutions guarantee of due process
B: holding massachusetts conviction for larceny from the person constitutes violent felony under the residual clause of the acca
C: holding residual clause of acca void for vagueness
D: holding that va code  182603 is not void for vagueness
C.