With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". WL 6231727, at *2 (6th Cir. Dec. 3, 2013) (en banc) (Nos. 12-5226, 12-5582) (<HOLDING>). We dispense with oral argument because the

A: holding that 1 the fsajs new mandatory minimums do not apply to defendants sentenced before it took effect 2  3582c2 does not provide a vehicle for circumventing that interpretation and 3 the constitution does not provide a basis for blocking it
B: holding that fraudulent oral misrepresentation of the level of benefits does not provide the basis for a nonpreempted claim even though erisa may also provide no remedy
C: holding professional rules do not provide basis for civil liability
D: holding that  10512a does not provide for individual liability because it does not include any of the phrases that so clearly provide a basis for individual liability under other subparts of lad
A.