With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the instant offense while on probation for his Oregon misdemeanor assault offense. See U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(d). But Barrera failed to object below to the factual findings of the PSR. Without objection, the district court accepted the PSR’s recommendation and added two points to Barrera’s criminal history score. Accordingly, Barrera “has waived this issue and may not raise it before this court unless he can demonstrate plain error resulting in a miscarriage of justice.” United States v. Flores, 959 F.2d 83, 88 (8th Cir.1992) (internal quotations and citations omitted). The Guidelines allow a district court to award two additional crim th Cir.1997) (stating that Congress did not intend for deportation to extinguish supervised release); United States v. Brown, 54 F.3d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). We find these authorities persuasive.

A: holding that the failure to notify aliens counsel of an order to appear for deportation violated the aliens statutory right to counsel
B: holding that because congress did not specifically state that deportation terminates supervised release it remains intact even after an aliens deportation
C: holding that term of supervised release was not automatically terminated when defendant was deported from united states and thus defendants subsequent commission of another offense illegal reentry after deportation prior to expiration of term of supervised release violated condition of supervised release that defendant commit no new offenses
D: holding that deportation does not extinguish term of supervised release
B.