With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". recover for all harm caused, even if more serious because of the predisposition or special vulnerability of the person, if the stimulus is sufficient to cause a reasonable person to suffer serious emotional disturbance. Restatement (Third) of Torts, supra, § 46 cmt. i; see Drejza, 650 A.2d at 1314 n. 16 (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts, supra, § 46 cmts. f & j); see also Chumar, 896 P.2d at 204 (“[Sjerious mental distress may be found where a reasonable man, normally constituted, would be unable to adequately cope with the mental stress engendered by the circumstances of the case.” (quoting Rodrigues v. State, 52 Haw. 156, 472 P.2d 509, 520 (1970))); accord Paugh v. Hanks, 6 Ohio St.3d 72, 451 N.E.2d 759, 765 (1983); cf. Williamson v. Bennett, 251 N.C. 498, 112 S.E.2d 48 (1960) (<HOLDING>). That likelihood may be shown by evidence that

A: holding in a fcra case that plaintiffs may not rely on mere  conclusory statements  rather they must  sufficiently articulate  true demonstrable emotional distress  including the factual context in which the emotional distress arose evidence corroborating the testimony of the plaintiff the nexus between the conduct of the defendant and the emotional distress the degree of such mental distress mitigating circumstances if any physical injuries suffered due to the emotional distress medical attention resulting from the emotional duress psychiatric or psychological treatment and the loss of income if any
B: holding that plaintiffs outsized emotional reaction to car accident was not allowed as basis for emotional distress damages where reasonable person would have experienced some anger or been upset but would not have suffered severe distress
C: holding that emotional distress damages are not recoverable under section 504
D: holding that a tort claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is distinct from a claim for emotional distress damages under the employment discrimination statute
B.