With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Dore, 31 P.3d at 793. 8 . See Webb v. City & Borough of Sitka, 561 P.2d 731, 733 (Alaska 1977), superseded in part by statute, AS 09.65.200, as recognized in Univ. of Alaska v. Shanti, 835 P.2d 1225, 1228 n. 5 (Alaska 1992). 9 . Id. 10 . 946 P.2d 1255, 1258 (Alaska 1997) (footnote omitted). 11 . 274 P.3d 1193, 1202 (Alaska 2012) (interpreting the duty to "maintain property in a reasonably safe condition'" to mean that the property owner may have had a duty to maintain its driveway in such a way as to reduce the likelihood of accidents caused by third parties). 12 . Restatement (Seconp) or Torts § 302B. 13 . Restatement (Seconp) or Torts § 449 ("If the likelihood that a third person may act in a particular manner is the hazard or one of the d 190, 15 P.3d 1283, 1285 (2001) (en banc) (<HOLDING>). 20 . 112 Cal.App.3d 206, 169 Cal.Rptr. 282

A: holding that where a third partys conduct is closely related to the contractual relationship or the contractual dispute and where the third party enjoys financial benefit from the contract the forum selection clause applies to the third party
B: holding that a third party has authority to consent to a search if the third party is a coinhabitant
C: holding that it was not foreseeable that a third party would steal a minivan that had been left in a safe part of town unlocked with the keys in the ignition and cause a crash
D: holding defendant assumed risk that third party would consent to search of storage locker where defendant instructed third party to rent locker under third partys name and allowed third party to keep possession of lease papers and to occasionally retain the keys
C.