With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Any claims under Title VII based on alleged events that occurred more than 180 days before the filing of an EEOC charge are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1); Stewart, 232 F.3d at 848. Plaintiff did not file an EEOC charge himself but apparently intends to “piggy-back” on the EEOC charge filed on July 21, 2000, by co-plaintiff Michael Edwards. Because none of the acts about which Plaintiff complains occurred on or after January 24, 2000, Plaintiff fails to state a claim under Title VII. Nor can Plaintiff state a claim under Section 1981 based on alleged events that occurred more than two years before the filing of this lawsuit, or before July 28, 1998. Hill v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth., 841 F.2d 1533, 1546 (11th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>). The only allegations Plaintiff now maintains

A: holding that texas twoyear statute of limitations applied to suit alleging racial discrimination under 42 usc  1981
B: holding that a compulsory counterclaim was barred by pennsylvanias twoyear statute of limitations notwithstanding that the plaintiff filed his complaint late in the twoyear limitations period
C: recognizing twoyear statute of limitations for section 1981 claims filed in federal court in georgia
D: holding that texas twoyear statute of limitations applied to section 1981 action for discrimination on the basis of national origin
C.