With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". was to be his only remedy”), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 875, 80 S.Ct. 139, 4 L.Ed.2d 114 (1959); Scalia v. United States, 475 F.Supp. 1040, 1042 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (a “significant limitation [of the waiver of sovereign immunity set forth in the Tort Claims Act] is contained in FECA, which expressly states that any illness or injury for which compensation is provided by FECA may not be the subject of a suit under the Tort Claims Act”). The applicability of FECA to United States Postal Service employees is clearly set forth in 39 U.S.C. § 1005(e). That section states: Officers and employees of the Postal Service shall be covered by subchapter I of Chapter 81 of title 5, relating to compensation for work injuries. 39 U.S.C. § 1005(c); see e.g. Griffin v. United States, 703 F.2d 321 (8th Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>). The complaint in this action alleges that the

A: holding that feca is the sole remedy for the back injury sustained on the job by a us postal service employee
B: holding that an injury is not within the scope of employment after the employee has left work unless the injury was caused by the employers negligence
C: holding that the injury sustained by the utility is damnum absque injuria
D: holding that an employer did not regard the employee as disabled because it called the employee back from disability leave to work on a special project
A.