With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". all of a generic nature and are capable of application to a wide range of contexts. Similarly, the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act ("CUT-PA”) is a general statute that regulates the conduct of all businesses within the state. See Conn. Gen.Stat. § 42-110b(a) ("No person shall engage in unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.”). Although CUTPA may be applied to the insurance industry, to enjoy the protections of McCarran-Ferguson, a statute must be more than just capable of application to insurance, but must have been "enacted ... for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance.” 15 U.S.C. § 1012(b). See Hamilton Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Republic Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 408 F.2d 606, 611 (2d Cir.1969) (<HOLDING>). 7 . In assessing the law of Connecticut, we

A: holding that a statute of general applicability was not enacted for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance
B: holding that if a statute regulating alcoholic liquors is enacted for economic purposes rather than as a police regulation of the business of selling intoxicating liquors it is unconstitutional
C: holding that the debtors deposit of funds was not in the ordinary course of business and was for the purpose of creating a setoff right for the bank
D: holding that the mccarranferguson act which bars application of a federal law in the face of a state law enacted for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance did not preclude the concurrent assertion of the federal rico statute and nevada insurance law
A.