With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". an action at law ... [that] cannot be affected by laches”); cf. T.P.D. v. A.C.D., 981 P.2d 116, 119-22 (Alaska 1999) (refusing to apply laches to bar a man from legally disestablishing paternity but acknowledging that equitable estoppel may apply to such an action). 27 . State, Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support Enf't Div. ex rel. Valdez v. Valdez, 941 P.2d 144, 152 (Alaska 1997). 28 . See AS 13.06.015 ("Unless displaced by the particular provisions of [Alaska’s Uniform Probate Code,] AS 13.06 - AS 13.36, the principles of law and equity supplement those provisions,”); see also Pestrikoff v. Hoff, 278 P.3d 281, 286 (Alaska 2012) (noting that AS 13.06.015 "permits a court to apply equitable principles to supplement the probate code’’); Riddell v. Edwards, 76 P.3d 847, 858 (Alaska 2003) (<HOLDING>); id. at 855 ("Alaska’s Uniform Probate Code

A: recognizing that in decidingclaims arising under the probate code a court may exercise its equitable powers unless explicitly forbidden to do so
B: recognizing that court may intervene in arbitration proceeding by invoking equitable powers
C: holding a court of criminal appeals may not exercise its sentence approval powers to criticize a state court conviction
D: holding that a claim of quantum meruit was appropriate in a probate case because under section 103 principles of law and equity supplement the provisions of the utah uniform probate code unless displaced by particular provisions of the code
A.