With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1562 (11th Cir.1997)); Lepore v. Lanvision Sys., Inc., 113 Fed.Appx. 449, 452 (3d Cir.2004) (opining that similarly situated employees “work in the same area in approximately the same position”) (citing Anderson, 297 F.3d at 249-50); Johnson v. Kroger Co., 319 F.3d 858, 867 (6th Cir.2003) (“In the context of personnel actions, the relevant factors for- determining whether employees are similarly situated often include the employees’ supervisors, the standards that the employees had to meet, and the employees’ conduct.”) (citation omitted); Milliron v. Pilot Travel Cntrs., LLC, No. 06-0262, 2009 WL 2579200, at *10 (W.D.Pa. Aug. 20, 2009) (citing Monaco and collecting other Circuit cases); Armstead v. Norfolk S. Corp., 2006 WL 544403, at *5 (W.D.Pa. Mar. 3, 2006) (<HOLDING>). - -Defendant challenges Plaintiffs ability to

A: holding that a supervisor was not similarly situated to another supervisor with the same title where the former could not perform the latters duties
B: holding that employer includes supervisor with some authority to address the harassment problem in organization with strong chain of command where supervisor could direct offender to cease and discipline if offender failed to comply
C: holding plaintiffs supervisor subject to suit
D: holding that notice to supervisor is notice to city
A.