With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". claims are barred by California’s sovereign immunity. Mot. at 4 (Docket No. 10) (citing Bd. of Trs. of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 374, 121 S.Ct. 955, 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001)). Plaintiff concedes that these claims are barred as currently alleged. Opp’n at 2 (Docket No. 11). However, Plaintiff argues that Defendant accepted federal funds under the Rehabilitation, Act, and, thereby waived its sovereign immunity for claims brought under that statute. Id. at 3 (citing Douglas v. Cal. Dept. of Youth Autk, 271 F.3d 812, 819-21 (9th Cir.2001) (“hold[ing] that by accepting federal Rehabilitation- Act funds, California has waived its sovereign immunity under, the Rehabilitation Act.”)). Plaintiff also argues that the. Rehabilitation Act explicitly incorp 2d 173, 181-83 (D.D.C.2010) (<HOLDING>). However, Defendant provides no authority

A: holding that the adas bar on claims by independent contractors applied to rehabilitation act claims
B: holding that the adas exhaustion requirement did not apply to rehabilitation act claims
C: recognizing that issue exhaustion requirement and requirement exhaustion of remedies are different
D: holding rehabilitation act applicable
B.