With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". have not even made that showing with regard to the specific items that are the subject of Kobe’s claims. Kobe’s future prospects with regard to the ACD seem especially uncertain. DHHS denied his request for the ACD his doctor ordered, and while the USC Program, apparently at Rich/Lex’s request, has now voluntarily allowed Kobe to use a satisfactory ACD, there is no indication that DHHS has ever altered its decision that Kobe is not legally entitled to such a device. If, after this ease is completed, the USC Program requests return of the ACD or if Kobe needs it adjusted, repaired, or replaced, he could well be met with the same sort of allegedly improper delays and denials that he claims repeatedly occurred before he decided to press his claims in court. Cf. Pashby, 709 F.3d at 316 (<HOLDING>). And Kobe certainly has reason to be concerned

A: holding that disability benefits are not retirementtype benefits
B: holding that retirement benefits are accrued benefits under erisa
C: holding that state agencys voluntary reinstatement of benefits after agency had previously announced that recipients no longer met the eligibility requirements for those benefits did not moot suit challenging the termination of the benefits when agency remained free to reassess the recipients needs and cancel their benefits at any time
D: holding that offset for social security retirement benefits does not include federal disability benefits and stating that there was no legislative intent to embody the entire subchapter of the social security act dealing with both disability benefits and old age benefits
C.