With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". observed in Major Media that: Although an occasional marginal case might arise raising the question of whether on the particular facts the definition of commercial speech would be correct, such an infrequent possibility ver, the Supreme Court held that the analogous state statute of limitations most appropriate for § 1983 actions is the limitation period for personal injury actions. Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985). In 1989, the Supreme Court further refined Wilson by holding that where state law provides multiple statutes of limitations for personal injury actions, courts considering § 1983 claims should borrow the general or residual statute for personal injury actions. Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 109 S.Ct. 573, 582, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989) (<HOLDING>). Thus, as courts since Wilson have recognized,

A: holding that federal courts apply the forum states personal injury statute of limitations for section 1983 claims
B: holding that the threeyear statute of limitations applicable to  1983 actions in arkansas governed idea claims
C: holding that if state law provides multiple statutes of limitations for personal injury actions the general or residual statute for personal injury actions should be used for 1983 actions
D: holding that new yorks threeyear residual statute of limitations for personal injury claims not embraced by specific statutes rather than oneyear statute of limitations for intentional torts governed  1983 action
D.