With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". standard is satisfied only if she actually suffered a physical impairment that substantially limited one or more of her major life activities.”). Additionally, neither Jackowski’s knowledge of Coming’s health conditions nor human resources employees’ awareness of, or maintaining a file pertaining to, Coming’s FMLA leave establishes that Corning had a record of disability. See Shepard v. UPS, Inc., 470 Fed.Appx. 726, 730-31 (11th Cir.2012) (“Shepard cannot demonstrate that he had a record of having an impairment based solely on his pri- or medical leaves of absence and testimony that it was common knowledge at UPS that he had leukemia, because he failed also to produce evidence that his impairment substantially limited him in a major life activity.”); Reis, 442 F.Supp.2d at 1248-49 (<HOLDING>); Coleman v. Ga. Power Co., 81 F.Supp.2d 1365,

A: holding that plaintiffs evidence showing that defendant refused to allow her to work as flight attendant because of her weight failed to demonstrate that defendant perceived her as substantially limited in any major life activity
B: holding that evidence of discussions with a supervisor regarding a health condition submission of various doctors notes to a former supervisor hospitalization and the occurrence of several telephone calls reporting her hospitalization was insufficient to show a record of disability because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that her impairment substantially limited a major life activity
C: holding that plaintiffs claim that she was disabled because her major life activity of breathing was substantially limited by her respiratory condition would provide a basis for protection under the ada
D: holding that the plaintiffs evidence of pretext which included but was not limited to her supervisors statement that she had enough of the plaintiff going to her supervisor about her was not sufficient to preclude summary judgment
B.