With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the harasser and the harassee can shed light on such relevant questions as whether the complained-of conduct was unwelcome”). The second line of cases are those in which the plaintiff adequately indicated the harassment was unwelcome. Sometimes the plaintiff has satisfied this element by-showing she explicitly rebuffed the, bad actor’s propositions or told the harasser she found the conduct offensive. See, e.g., Williams v. Herron, 687 F.3d 971, 975 (8th Cir. 2012) (deciding the plaintiff “adequately communicated” the conduct was unwelcome where she twice told the harasser it made her-“uncomfortable”). Other times "the plaintiff has reported the" conduct to someone with the authority to address the problem. See, e.g., Beach v. Yellow Freight Sys., 312 F.3d 391, 396 (8th Cir. 2002) (<HOLDING>). We have also found it relevant when the bad

A: holding evidence legally sufficient
B: holding that minor differences among the class are inconsequential and rejecting the defendants assertion that plaintiffs had not shown sufficient evidence that each plaintiff was disabled since the deprivations complained of by plaintiffs affected the entire class
C: holding evidence was sufficient where the plaintiff repeatedly complained to management
D: holding that the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to establish an agency relationship for service to be effective
C.