With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". has not offered either authority or argument to convince this Court that a warrantless search probation condition under which warrantless searches are conducted pursuant to reasonable suspicion is an unreasonable condition absent exigent circumstances. In conclusion, we hold that exigent circumstances are not required to make a warrantless probation search reasonable. We hold that, for rehabilitation and community safety purposes, probation officers have the right to conduct warrantless searches without the added requirement of exigent circumstances. Reasonable Suspicion Was Satisfied {50} Defendant argues that, if the lesser standard of reasonable suspicion applies, the district court erred by finding that reasonable suspicion existed. Defendant asserts the tip from 69, 973 P.2d 246 (<HOLDING>); State v. Flores, 1996-NMCA-059, ¶ 8, 122 N.M.

A: holding that tip from known reliable informant that was immediately verifiable at the scene could form basis for reasonable suspicion and forcible terry stop
B: holding a tip by informant who claimed to witness wrongdoing sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion
C: holding an informants tip can establish reasonable suspicion without investigative confirmation if the tip is credible
D: holding that a tip may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigatory stop
B.