With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is any genuine issue of material fact and if the movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Id.; see also Aikens v. Whites, 8 So.3d 139, 140 (¶ 9) (Miss.2008); M.R.C.P. 56(c). In conducting this review, we give the nonmoving party — in this case the Bradleys — the benefit of any doubt about whether a fact issue exists. Simmons v. Thompson Mach. of Miss., Inc., 631 So.2d 798, 802 (Miss.1994) (citing Brown v. Credit Ctr., Inc., 444 So.2d 358, 362 (Miss.1983)). I. Genuine Issue of Material Fact ¶ 22. Looking at all record evidence before us, we find that, based on the recorded contract, Kelley Brothers and Gregory failed to meet their burden to show there is no genuine issue of material fact. See Roebuck v. McDade, 760 So.2d 12, 14 (¶ 9) (Miss.Ct.App.1999) (citations omitted) (<HOLDING>). A. Genuine Issue ¶ 23. We find the

A: holding that once motion for summary judgment is properly made and supported opposing party has burden of showing by means of affidavits or other verified evidence that there exists genuine dispute of material fact
B: holding that an adverse party must state specific facts showing there is a genuine issue of fact for trial
C: holding that the moving party has tjhe burden of showing no genuine issue of material fact exists
D: holding that the moving party for summary judgment bears the initial burden of demonstrating the absence of a genuine issue of material fact for trial
C.