With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". admitted in evidence that contained a "department of corrections social and criminal history [ evaluation of the defendant] prepared by an unnamed department employee." Grey v. Texas, 299 S.W.3d 902, 906, 910 (Tex.App.2009). The court concluded that the "criminal history summary, not having been made in anticipation of prosecutorial use, was not testimonial.” Id. at 910. 8 . See generally , 26 Cal.Rptr.3d 190, 193 (2005) (concluding that proof of service of a domestic relations restraining order was nontestimonial); Colorado v. Shreck, 107 P.3d 1048, 1060-61 (Colo.Ct.App.2004) (determining that documentary evidence showing prior convictions and affidavits used to establish chain of custody for certain documents were nontestimonial); Iowa v. Shipley, 757 N.W.2d 228, 237-38 (Iowa 2008) (<HOLDING>); Kansas v. Dukes, 38 Kan.App.2d 958, 174 P.3d

A: holding that a certified abstract of a defendants driving record was nontestimonial
B: holding that driving records were nontestimonial
C: holding that certified records of maintenance are nontestimonial and are not prepared for any particular defendant
D: holding that a certified letter verifying that a defendant did not have a valid drivers license was nontestimonial and that washington courts have long recognized the inherent reliability and admissibility of driving records
A.