With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". LEXIS 1651, *47) (M.D. Pa. January 6, 2012) (dismissing invasion of privacy claim based on disclosure of a minor’s vaginal infection to students at her school and a neighboring school as “the publication was not so widespread that it was communicated to the public at large, or to so many people that it was ‘substantially certain’ to become public knowledge”). The trial court erred in denying the appellants’ motion for summary judgment as to this claim. 5. Lastly, the appellants contend that the trial court erred in failing to grant summary judgment to the City and Sahlberg, in his official capacity, as to Maia’s claims for punitive damages. We agree, and Maia concedes that the trial court erred in this respect. See City of Columbus v. Myszka, 246 Ga. 571, 573 (4) (272 SE2d 302) (1980) (<HOLDING>). Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in

A: holding that absent explicit statutory authority a municipality cannot be held liable for punitive damages
B: holding that the board cannot be liable for punitive damages citations omitted
C: holding that a municipality may be held liable as a person under  1983
D: holding that a municipality may only be held liable under  1983 for a policy practice or custom
A.