With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the sentencing court may apply credit against a sentence for time spent in custody for another charge or crime. The issue before us is whether, like the Court of Special Appeals, we adopt a plain meaning analysis of Section 6-218(b)(2) and determine that the mandatory credit for time served does not apply because the term “nolle prosequi” is absent, or, whether we construe Section 6-218(b)(2) as ambiguous. The decision whether to utilize a plain meaning analysis or an analysis based upon the ambiguity of a statute is made first by looking to see whether the Legislature has provided a definition for the term in question. Deville, 383 Md. at 229, 858 A.2d at 491 (“the legislative history of [the statute] fails to provide an actual definition.”); Melton, 379 Md. at 489, 842 A.2d at 753 (<HOLDING>). If there is no definition, we then ask

A: holding that the term indecent act required no further definition
B: holding that the definition of operating deficits is not ambiguous despite the absence of a definition of the phrase in the contract
C: holding that the statute was ambiguous because it provides no definition of the term violation and provides no specific direction as to the proper unit of prosecution
D: holding that michigan law provides no substantive right to parole
C.