With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". literal reading of § 523(a)(2)(A) is inconsistent with our ease law. See In re Levy, 951 F.2d 196, 198 (9th Cir.1991) (section 523(a)(2)(A) “limits nondis-ehargeability to the amount of benefit to the debtor or loss to the creditor the act of fraud itself created”). An action for nondischarge-ability under § 523(a)(2)(A) requires only: (1) a representation; (2) falsity; (3) scienter; (4) reliance; and “(5) that the creditor sustained the alleged loss and damage as the proximate result of the representations having been made.” In re Britton, 950 F.2d at 604. Malpractice is a foreseeable result of any medical procedure, id. at 604-05, and the fifth element can be proved if the debtor fraudulently induced the creditor to undergo a procedure that was then negligently performed. Id. at 605 (<HOLDING>). Lee-Benner alleged damage from negligent

A: holding that the district courts finding of no discrimination under title vii was not clearly erroneous because the finding was supported by the record
B: holding finding of reliability not clearly erroneous despite lack of prior description
C: holding bankruptcy courts finding of proximate causation not to be clearly erroneous
D: holding that the district courts finding of no discrimination was not clearly erroneous because the finding was supported by the record
C.