With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in the reverse-and-remand judgment we issued after the first appeal in this case. But Wise Electric petitioned the Texas Supreme Court to review that judgment, the Texas Supreme Court denied Wise Electric’s petition, our mandate issued, and the case was remanded to the trial court and retried. Thus, our plenary jurisdiction over our judgment in the first appeal has 'expired. See Tex. R. App. 18.1,19.1; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.225 (West' Supp. 2014).- We lack jurisdiction to reinstate the jury’s damage findings from thé first trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 19.3 (listing limited actions appellate court may take after expiration of plenary power over judgment), 43.2 (listing types of judgment an appellate court can render); see also Browning v. Prostok, 165 S.W.3d 336, 345-47 (Tex.2005) (<HOLDING>). We overrule Wise Electric’s seventh issue.

A: recognizing that only void judgments are subject to collateral attack and that a judgment is void only when court had no jurisdiction of the parties or property no jurisdiction of the subject matter no jurisdiction to enter the particular judgment or no capacity to act
B: recognizing collateral attack on void order
C: holding that judgments entered by a court having subject matter and personal jurisdiction are not void
D: holding that district court had subjectmatter jurisdiction and yet that judgment void for lack of jurisdiction to render the particular judgment
A.