With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". would help solve the crime.... ” Motive is one of the permissible purposes listed in Rule 404(b) not because the “why” helps solve a crime, but because it is highly relevant to show that a defendant had a motivation to commit the crime for which he is being charged. In a case like this, where Lee is asserting that he never had a gun on the day in question, it is important to know that he had a personal motivation to possess a gun. Indeed, someone who is involved in an ongoing feud — a feud during which guns have been used — is far more likely to have a gun in his possession than someone who is not involved in such a feud. United States v. Lee, 612 F.3d 170, 187 n. 19 (3d Cir.2010) (citation omitted and emphasis added); see also United States v. Harris, 587 F.3d 861, 868 (7th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Weems, 322 F.3d 18, 25 (1st

A: holding that evidence of gang membership was admissible because the testimony also reflected harriss motive for possessing these particular firearms
B: holding appellate counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to appeal district courts decision to admit evidence that defendant was a member of a gang because gang membership was relevant to show motive and intent
C: holding the district court properly admitted expert testimony on defendants active gang membership
D: holding that evidence of gang involvement was properly admitted to prove motive for participating in the alleged crimes
A.