With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". deduction may appropriately be based on the commission paid pursuant to [19 U.S.C. § 1677a(d)(l)(A) ]. Remand Determ, at 13. This Court has sustained Commerce’s practice of treating commissions paid by the producer to an affiliated trading company as an intracompany transfer, rather than as a true commission, where the transfer merely serves as a reimbursement for the affiliated party’s actual selling expenses. See Floral Trade Council v. United States, 23 CIT-,-, 41 F.Supp.2d 319 (1999) at 324. A decision “not to deduct commissions paid to affiliated [trading companies] is ... reasonable to the extent that it fulfills the statutory objective of preventing double-counting.” Id. at -, 41 F.Supp.2d at 324 (citing U.S. Steel Group v. United States, 22 CIT-,-, 15 F.Supp.2d 892, 905 (1998)(<HOLDING>), appeal docketed, No. 99-1342 (Fed.Cir. Feb.

A: holding that an award for medical expenses is proper when the expenses have been incurred but not paid
B: holding that debtors have the burden of proving that other necessary expenses on form b22c are actual reasonable and necessary expenses and that these expenses should be considered in light of schedule j and other relevant evidence
C: holding that if because of the relatedness of the producer and us selling agent expenses represented by the commissions are already accounted for by means of a deduction for selling expenses nominally made under another provision of 19 usca  1677ad  no additional commission deduction need be made
D: holding that although the lessor was not entitled to an administrative expense claim under  365d10 for the debtors use of leased property during the first sixty days of the ease the lessor would be entitled to those expenses under  503b1 to the extent the lessor could prove the expenses represented the actual necessary costs and expenses of preserving the estate
C.