With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the requirements of intermediate scrutiny under First Amendment case law.) The Court finds that section 922(k) passes constitutional muster under these requirements: the purpose of the statute is to assist law enforcement in tracing weapons via their serial numbers; the connection between this objective and the statute is reasonable because common sense dictates that “[fjirearms without serial numbers are of particular value to those engaged in illicit activity because the absence of serial numbers helps shield recovered firearms and their possessors from identification”; and the regulation only reaches conduct that has a substantial risk of rendering a firearm untraceable because it does not, in any way, limit the possession of any specific class of firearms. Id. at 98-99 (<HOLDING>) Thus, the Court finds that section 922(k)

A: holding that section 922k passes muster under intermediate scrutiny and would also pass muster under a strict scrutiny analysis
B: holding a mandatory sentence is still subject to constitutional scrutiny
C: holding contribution limits even those that operate as a ban not subject to strict scrutiny
D: holding that aesthetics and neighborhood preservation are not sufficiently compelling interests to withstand strict scrutiny analysis
A.