With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Esfeld v. Costa Crociere, S.P.A., 289 F.3d 1300, 1311 (11th Cir.2002); see also Burt, 218 F.2d at 356 (“This nation has historically been most solicitous of its citizens’ welfare and its courts exist as much for the adjudication of its citizens’ controversies as for the enforcement of its laws.”). Furthermore, it is clear that a sovereign has a very strong interest when its citizens are allegedly victims and the injury occurs on home soil. See, e.g., Piper Aircraft, 454 U.S. 235, 102 S.Ct. 252, 70 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981) (finding that Scotland had a stronger interest than the United States in hearing the case in part because “[t]he accident occurred in its airspace” and “[a]ll of the decedents were Scottish”); Satz v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 244 F.3d 1279, 1284 (11th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). Thus, in this case, the United States has a

A: holding that new york convention governed award rendered in the united states that arose out of dispute involving two nondomestic parties and one united states corporation
B: holding that the plaintiff must demonstrate that defendants contacts with the united states as a whole support the exercise of jurisdiction consistent with the constitution and laws of the united states
C: holding that the fourteenth amendment which makes persons bom in the united states and subject to its jurisdiction citizens of the united states and requires that representatives be apportioned among the states based on population excluding indians not taxed did not make an indian a citizen of the united states
D: holding that argentinas interest in deciding the dispute was stronger than the united states where all the victims of a plane crash were argentinean and the plane crashed in argentina
D.