With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and citation omitted); Whitney, 396 S.W.3d at 704 (quoting Hawkins); see also Archie, 340 S.W.3d at 739 (noting mistrial appropriate when the objectionable events "are so emotionally inflammatory that curative instructions are not likely to prevent the jury from being unfairly prejudiced against the defendant” (internal quotation marks and ■citation omitted)). 7 .Hawkins, 135 S.W.3d at 77; Mosley, 983 S.W.2d at 259. 8 . Wesbrook v. State, 29 S.W.3d 103, 115 (Tex. Crim.App.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 944, 121 S.Ct. 1407, 149 L.Ed.2d 349 (2001); Whitney, 396 S.W.3d at 704. 9 . Archie, 340 S.W.3d at 741; Thrift v. State, 176 S.W.3d 221, 224 (Tex.Crim.App.2005); Whitney, 396 S.W.3d at 706. 10 .Thrift, 176 S.W.3d at 224. 11 . See Waldo v. State, 746 S.W.2d 750, 756 (Tex.Crim.App.1988)

A: holding good faith jury instruction unnecessary when court gave adequate specific intent instruction
B: holding good faith jury instruction is not necessary when the court has given an adequate specific intent instruction
C: recognizing that upon request the trial court may provide a limiting instruction to the jury
D: holding trial courts instruction adequate when defendant failed to request a sharper rebuke before moving for a mistrial
D.