With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". than based on ‘demonstrated historical facts capable of ready verification’ ” that the officers would have applied for, let alone obtained, a warrant to search appellant’s abode. Thus, the “requisite actuality that the discovery would have ultimately been made by lawful means” is entirely lacking here. We t officers entered her room, the government adds that "[e]ven assuming arguendo that appellant’s statement as to the location of the property [in her bath tub] violated Miranda because a ‘custodial interrogation' had been taking place at that time, the Miranda violation would not justify suppression of the [physical] evidence because the statement was nonetheless voluntary.” Id. at 16 n. 10 (citing United States v. Patane, 542 U.S. 630, 634, 124 S.Ct. 2620, 159 L.Ed.2d 667 (2004) (<HOLDING>)). 12 . Maryland v. Shatter, 559 U.S. 98, 112,

A: holding that the fifth amendment did not require the suppression of the physical fruits of a miranda violation where the statement was voluntary
B: holding that the statement ill take the fifth was an assertion of the fifth amendment privilege
C: holding miranda violation does not vitiate voluntary consent
D: holding that the physical fruits of a miranda violation must be suppressed
A.