With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". course of a conspiracy. 9 . "In those cases,” one commentator has explained, "participation by two people ... is already indicated, so the social harm of a criminal combination has already been realized and punishment for conspiracy to do the same act would be an unfair doubling.” John L. Costello, Virginia Criminal Law and Procedure § 17.3, at 224 (3d ed.2002). 10 . Appellant further argues in her brief, as an aside, that the trial court’s denial of her request to allow a proffer for the record of Dr. Deem’s specific answers to her questions constitutes an independent ground for reversal. Because this issue was not presented in a "Question Presented" for which an appeal was granted, we do not address it here. See Parker v. Commonwealth, 42 Va.App. 358, 373, 592 S.E.2d 358, 366 (2004) (<HOLDING>). 11 . Hulbert had not yet been tried. Indeed,

A: recognizing that we will only consider those arguments presented in the petition for appeal and granted by this court
B: holding that we do not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief
C: holding court will generally not consider arguments presented for the first time on appeal
D: holding that subject to limited exceptions this court will not consider issues not presented to the district court but raised for the first time on appeal
A.