With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 2 . Case No. 16-20042, Docket No, 32, Motion to Avoid Judicial Lien Impairing Homestead Exemption. All future references to the Docket will be to Case No. 16-20042, unless expressly stated otherwise. 3 .Any of the findings of fact herein are also deemed to be conclusions of law, and any conclusions of law herein are also deemed to be findings of fact, and they shall be equally binding as both, 4 . Docket No. 1, Chapter 13 Voluntary Petition. 5 . Docket No. 38, Order Confirming Debtors’ Chapter 13 Plan. 6 . Docket No. 2, Debtors’ Chapter 13 Plan at ¶ 6(g). 7 . Cyprus filed an unsecured proof of claim in the amount of $15,698.45 on March 29, 2016. See Case No. 16-20042, Proof of Claim No. 9-1. 8 . See Tower Loan of Miss., Inc. v. Maddox (Matter of Maddox), 15 F.3d 1347 (5th Cir. 1994) (<HOLDING>). 9 .See Andrews v. Loheit (In re Andrews), 49

A: holding that a chapter 13 debtor had standing to avoid a judgment lien to the extent of her exemption amount but not the entire judgment lien
B: holding that chapter 13 debtors were unable to avoid a creditors unperfected secured claim because they lacked standing
C: holding that debtor could not avoid a judicial lien where after accounting for unavoidable liens and mortgages he had no equity in the property and therefore no interest on which to avoid the judicial lien
D: holding that the chapter 13 trustee had standing to avoid liens as impairing exemptions to prevent inequitable distribution of payments caused by debtors failure to avoid lien as impairing exemption
D.