With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Manufacturers Mutual Ins. Co. v. Aries Marine Corporation, 932 F.2d 442, 445 (5th Cir.1991). 35 . See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); E.E.O.C. v. Texas Instruments, Inc., 100 F.3d 1173, 1179-80 (5th Cir.1996); Fields v. City of South Houston, Texas, 922 F.2d 1183, 1187 (5th Cir.1991); and Lodge Hall Music, Inc. v. Waco Wrangler Club, Inc., 831 F.2d 77, 79 (5th Cir.1987). 36 . Rule 56(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 37 . Rule 56(e) only requires the summary judgment nonmovant to submit affidavits and other summary judgment proof when the original motion is supported by proper affidavits or other summary judgment proof. See E.E.O.C. v. Brown & Root, Inc., 688 F.2d 338, 341 n. 2 (5th Cir.1982); see also Orthopedic & Sports Injury Clinic v. Wang, 922 F.2d 220, 225 (5th Cir.1991), (<HOLDING>). 38 . E.E.O.C. v. Texas Instruments, Inc., 100

A: holding that affidavits must set forth facts admissible in evidence and explain its conclusions
B: holding affidavits based on conclusory allegations insufficient at summary judgment
C: holding that unsupported affidavits setting forth ultimate or conclusory facts and conclusions of law are insufficient to either support or defeat a motion for summary judgment
D: holding that affidavits that are conclusory and based on hearsay can not be used to oppose motion for summary judgment
C.