With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of material fact exists as to whether this incident occurred on school property. 6 . Stennis argues that Gammel is not applicable, as Gammel was a trespasser — a status clearly distinguishable from that of a student attending school. Yet, Gammel’s status when he was in the school bus parking lot is irrelevant to the Court of Appeals’ holding. The critical aspect was that Gammel relinquished any status he possessed when he exited the school property — the result being the same had he been an invitee or licensee. 7 . In Groner, this Court explicitly held that a "regulation” created by the Mississippi High School Activities Association imposed a duty on Pearl High School. Groner, 784 So.2d at 915; see also Mississippi Dep’t of Human Servs. v. S.W., 111 So.3d 630, 639 (Miss.Ct.App.2012)

A: holding that the childrens court exceeded its authority in prohibiting the human services department from placing a child with her brother
B: holding that the department of human services policy manual set forth ministerial duties to act to care for and protect children in its custody
C: holding that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children
D: recognizing parents fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children
B.