With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". actions against a franchisor. Moreover ... these provisions are usually part of the standard contract which the franchisee is offered on a "take-it or leave-it” basis. In the absence of arms length negotiations and equal bargaining position, such terms are usually unconscionable. The author asserts that it is in the state’s interest and powers to void such contractual terms to protect its residents. Id. at 2, 92 S.Ct. 1907. 16 . Lou v. Belzberg, 834 F.2d 730, 734 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 993, 108 S.Ct. 1302, 99 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988). 17 . Stewart Org. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29, 108 S.Ct. 2239, 101 L.Ed.2d 22 (1988) (citation omitted). 18 . Id. 19 . See, e.g., Stewart, 487 U.S. at 29-31, 108 S.Ct. 2239; Lou, 834 F.2d at 739. 20 . Stewart, 487 U.S. at 29, 108 S.Ct. 2239 (<HOLDING>). A forum selection clause, however, is not

A: holding that  1404a governed a forum non conveniens motion to transfer based upon a forum selection clause despite the current forums public policy that may refuse to enforce such provisions
B: holding that a permissive forum selection clause containing a waiver of any claims of forum non conveniens amounts to a mandatory forum selection clause at least where the plaintiff chose the designated forum
C: holding that a district court has discretion to grant a defendants forum non conveniens motion to transfer before disposing of any other threshold challenges
D: holding that issue concerning forum non conveniens decision was not suitable for interlocutory appeal in part because a forum non conveniens decision is inherently factsensitive
A.