With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". charge. Appellants objected to the submission of special issues on the use of a deadly weapon at any stage of the trial, but they particularly argued that if such special issues were to be submitted they should be submitted during the punishment stage of trial. Appellants argued at trial, as they do on appeal, that the deadly weapon issue is clearly an issue to be decided during punishment and that it would be inappropriate to submit such an issue during the guilt-innocence stage of trial. However, this argument is inaccurate. See Luken v. State, 780 S.W.2d 264, 268 (Tex.Crim.App.1989) (acknowledging that Court of Criminal Appeals has never said deadly weapon issue must be resolved at punishment stage of trial); McIntosh v. State, 865 S.W.2d 753, 771 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1993, pet. refd) (<HOLDING>). In fact, the clear wording of sections 4(a)

A: holding party may raise jurisdictional issue at any stage of proceedings
B: holding that the application of the fair use doctrine at the pleading stage is appropriate
C: holding that the filing of a motion for a new trial is a critical stage of the prosecution and that an indigent defendant is constitutionally entitled to the assistance of counsel at that stage
D: holding that trial court is not prohibited from submitting special issue on use of a deadly weapon at the guiltinnocence stage of trial
D.