With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". In my opinion, no further discussion is necessary. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the family court properly ordered the unsealing of the record in this case. I agree with the test formulated in the majority opinion for determining whether a record should be unsealed. I differ with the majority opinion’s placement of the burden of persuasion on Appellant, the opponent of the motion to unseal the record. In my opinion, the proponent of the motion, Capital, is the party that should bear the burden of persuasion. The burden of persuasion for sealing the record was met in the first instance before the family court. Imposing on Appellant a perpetual burden of keeping the record sealed is inappropriate. See, e.g., Welch v. Welch, 48 Conn.Supp. 19, 828 A.2d 707 (2003) (<HOLDING>); but see, e.g., Ark. Best. Corp. v. Gen. Elec.

A: holding that where father who killed his wife had relinquished his children for adoption prior to his conviction the maternal grandparents of the children who had legal custody at the time of the adoption had standing to petition to unseal the adoption records this court vacated the orphans courts order that held the grandparents lacked standing and directed that on remand the orphans court determine whether the grandparents had shown cause under section 2905a to unseal the records
B: holding that municipal court records were admissible under  official records or public documents  exception
C: recognizing a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents including judicial records and documents
D: holding that if the court determines that the papers and records should be kept confidential the burden to show good cause would be upon the party requesting to unseal or open the documents
D.