With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". meeting at which Getch purportedly told those present that his conviction had been reversed. See Affidavit of Anthony Getch, August 15, 1988 [hereinafter Getch Affidavit] ¶ 6. 6 . Sherrer Certification II, supra, ¶ 4; Rafferty Affidavit, supra, ¶ 4. 7 . Defendant’s Memorandum of Law, Exhibit H. 8 . Sherrer Certification II, supra, ¶¶ 4-6. Since the events herein, Rahway prison officials have adopted the practice of contacting the inmate’s own attorney rather than the prosecutor in cases such as this. Id. ¶ 7. 9 . Id. ¶ 7. 10 . Defendant's Memorandum of Law, Exhibit I. 11 . Id. Exhibit J. 12 . Id. Exhibit K. 13 . Id. Exhibit L, 14 . Id. Exhibit M; Rafferty Affidavit, supra, ¶¶8-9. 15 . Getch Affidavit, supra, ¶¶ 9-10. 16 . Cf. Maddox v. Thomas, 671 F.2d 949, 950 (5th Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>). 17 . See supra note 2. 18 .Nevertheless, the

A: holding that the defendant bears the burden of proof and that such a disposition does not violate the due process clause
B: holding that defendant has due process right to introduce evidence on minimum parole eligibility in sentencing phase
C: holding that the due process clause confers a right to direct a childs education
D: holding that a convict awaiting sentencing has no such right arising from the due process clause
D.