With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the new district lines omit some persons and/or add others and, in the case of two state House districts, the districts have been completely collapsed and moved to high-growth areas of the state. If special elections held prior to the next round of regularly-scheduled elections were to be held under the new district lines, the effect would be to leave some persons with no representation and others with double representation. Such a situation is obviously not one that the United States Constitution would allow, much less require. Cf. Gaona v. Anderson, 989 F.2d 299 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (rejecting Voting Rights Act challenge to use of old version of state senate district for an interim special election); Political Action Conference of Illinois v. Daley, 976 F.2d 335 (7th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); French v. Boner, 963 F.2d 890 (6th Cir.1992)

A: holding that because the statute requires commerce to use data from economically comparable countries to the extent possible commerce may not employ a methodology that requires using data from both economically comparable and economically dissimilar countries in the absence of a showing that using the data congress has directed commerce to use is impossible
B: holding that city need not alter its redistricting scheme even though fouryear terms of aldermen elected in 1991 resulted in a fouryear delay in using new 1990 census data
C: holding that under  98 of restatement principal elected to ratify unauthorized act by accepting benefits of agreement with full knowledge of its terms and was therefore bound to terms of agreement
D: holding that attorneys fees were available to seller who elected to terminate a contract for deed in accordance with its default terms
B.