With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of availability and accessibility”). 13 . Id. 14 . Id. 15 . Gardner v. State, 567 A.2d at 414. 16 . See Childress v. State, 721 A.2d 929, 931 (Del.1998) (explaining that “a drug-sale operation is a 'continuing felony' the 'locus’ of which is wherever the defendant keeps his contraband”) (citing Kornbluth v. State, 580 A.2d 556, 560-61 (Del.1990)); see also Wilson v. State, 343 A.2d 613, 618 (Del.1975). 17 . Childress v. State, 721 A.2d at 931-32; Wilson v. State, 343 A.2d at 618. 18 . Childress v. State, 721 A.2d at 931 (citing Del.Code Ann. tit. 11, § 1447A). 19 . Mack v. State, 312 A.2d 319, 320 (Del.1973). 20 . Id. 21 . Id. at 322. 22 . Lewis v. State, 1990 WL 38306, at *1 (Del.Supr. Mar. 19, 1990). 23 . Id., at *4. 24 . Id., at *3-4; see Childress v. State, 721 A.2d at 930-32 (<HOLDING>); Wilson v. State, 343 A.2d at 618 (holding

A: holding evidence insufficient for conviction for possession of controlled dangerous substances when the drugs were not found on the person of or in the same room as the defendant but were only found on other persons on the premises
B: holding that there was sufficient probable cause to search a defendants residence after evidence of drug dealing was found in his car during a traffic stop that was conducted when the defendant was coming from his residence and noting that under such circumstances a practical commonsense conclusion could be made that the drugs and money had been at the defendants residence a short time before the stop
C: holding evidence was sufficient to support conviction for pfdcf where defendant was arrested immediately outside his residence and an unloaded handgun was found in the residence under the defendants bed and in the same room as the controlled substances and cash
D: recognizing that a protective search of a residence may be justified when the defendant is arrested outside of the home
C.