With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". R.R.'s Mem. in Supp. of Mot. to Dismiss ¶ 18, May 22, 2007 ("[Settlements with a school district (except those that result from a resolution meeting ...) are not enforceable ....” (emphasis added)); R.R.'s Reply to EPISD's Opp'n to Mot. for Summ. J. 2, Dec. 14, 2007 ("Likewise, any written settlement agreement that is 'reached to resolve the complaint at a [resolution meeting]' ... is enforceable in a state or federal court.”).) 13 . As a threshold matter, the IDEA states that § 1415(i)(3)(F) shall not apply "if the court finds that the ... local educational agency unreasonably protracted the final resolution of the action or proceeding ...." Id. § 1415(i)(3)(G). Nothing in the record indicates that EPISD unreaso , District of Columbia v. Ijeabuonwu, 631 F.Supp.2d 101, 104 (D.D.C.2009) (<HOLDING>); Parenteau v. Prescott Unified Sch. Dist., No.

A: holding that the party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorneys fees
B: holding that a defendant is the prevailing party within the meaning of statutory provisions awarding attorneys fees to the prevailing party even when the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the action
C: holding that buckhannon applies to the attorneys fees provision of the idea
D: recognizing that a school district must be a prevailing party in order to be entitled to attorneys fees under the idea
D.