With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to grant the putative father standing to challenge paternity. See, e.g., R.A.J. v. L.B.V., 169 Ariz. 92, 817 P.2d 37, 40 (Ct.App.1991) (interpreting "father” in statute listing individuals permitted to commence a paternity-action to include "putative father”); Willmon v. Hunter, 297 Ark. 358, 761 S.W.2d 924, 926 (1988) (statutory legitimacy presumptions do not preclude a party from litigating paternity); see also Simcox v. Simcox, 131 Ill.2d 491, 137 Ill.Dec. 664, 546 N.E.2d 609, 612 (1989) (although putative father had statutory right to bring paternity action, issue of whether he was barred from such action was not ripe); K.S. v. R.S., 669 N.E.2d 399, 404 (Ind.1996) (statute permits putative father to maintain paternity action); Smith v. Jones, 566 So.2d 408, 413-14 (La.Ct.App.1990) (<HOLDING>); Ivy v. Harrington, 644 So.2d 1218, 1223

A: holding that although a putative father had standing to bring a paternity action the action could not proceed and the blood tests could not be ordered unless the trial court determined that the paternity action would serve the best interest of the child
B: holding that alleged biological father who sought to establish paternity waived constitutional error though it was undisputed that father had received no notice or hearing on prior paternity adjudication that created bar
C: holding that a child was not barred by a former statute of limitations applicable to actions to establish the existence of a father and child relationship when the current action was to establish the nonexistence of a father and child relationship and the presumed father no longer persisted in maintaining paternity
D: recognizing dual paternity where biological father has actual relationship with child or has been prevented from forming relationship by mother and acts to establish paternity within a reasonable time of childs birth he may use compulsory blood test in avowal action
D.