With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Inc. is nondischargeable in the amount of $1,347.90. FURTHER ORDERED AND AD-JUDGED that Pikco Finance, Inc.’s re-quest for attorney’s fees and costs is GRANTED IN PART in the amount of $1,655,00 for a total nondischargeable judgment in the amount of $3,002.90, to-gether with interest thereon from the date of the entry of this Final Judgment at the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1961. SO ORDERED. 1 . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, made applicable to this adversary by Fed-eral Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052, the following constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Court. 2 . See Johnson v. Ga. Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir. 1974) abrogated in part by Blanchard v. Bergeron, 489 U.S. 87, 93, 109 S.Ct. 939, 103 L.Ed.2d 67 (1989) (<HOLDING>). 3 . But see Speights v. Speights, 126 So.3d

A: holding that contingency fee contract did not cap award of attorneys fees where johnson had so held
B: holding that an award of attorneys fees under supreme court rule 38 precursor to rule 222 did not preempt an award of attorneys fees to which one is otherwise entitled and thus appellant could seek an award of attorneys fees pursuant to section 1577300 which permits an award of fees for a party prevailing in an action against a state agency
C: holding trial court had no authority to award attorneys fees when arbitrator had stated he would not award attorneys fees
D: holding that the termination of the fee cap did not affect litigation in progress when the fee cap was in effect
A.