With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". applies to petitions under § 2255(f). That period begins to run from the latest of several events: (1) the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final; (2) the date on which the impediment to making a motion created by governmental action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the movant was prevented from making a motion by such governmental action; (3) the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or (4) the date on which the facts supporting the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f). By fil 000) (<HOLDING>). Holloway did not remove an “impediment”

A: holding that change in state substantive case law does not constitute the removal of an impediment
B: holding that a change in the law of sentencing does not constitute a new factor
C: holding that a change in personal circumstances in the united states does not constitute a change in country conditions and therefore does not establish an exception to the filing deadline for motions to reopen
D: holding that the 2005 amendment was a substantive change
A.