With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the conduct for which Sassano is being sued could not have been taken in his capacity as a nominal officer of Wealth Management. The court disagrees. As explained above, Sassano did not hold his title with Wealth Management. He held his title with CIBC, which is a registered broker-dealer. CIBC's argument fails for that reason alone. 96 . 888 A.2d 204, 215 (Del.2005). 97 . See Pl.’s Tr. Ex. 8; Manual at 26. 98 . Def.’s Tr. Ex. 1. 99 . Sassano was wholly successful in this litigation, and is therefore entitled to all reasonable fees he incurred in bringing it. See Bylaws, Article IX (stating World Markets will indemnify Sassano “to the full extent permitted by the laws of the State of Delaware ... ”); see also Fasciana v. Electronic Data Sys. Corp., 829 A.2d 178, 184 (Del.Ch.2003)

A: holding that a plaintiff awarded advancement after litigation should only be entitled to an indemnification of those expenses reasonably proportionate to the level of success he achieved in the litigation
B: holding that the employer was entitled to an order requiring the claimants counsel to repay the erroneously awarded litigation costs
C: recognizing a defendants right to appeal when a court fails to award litigation expenses in a condemnation action
D: holding that federal rule of civil procedure 11 was not a feeshifting provision because rule 11 sanctions 1 were not tied to the outcome of the litigation instead turning on whether a specific filing was well founded and 2 shifted the costs of a discrete portion of the litigation rather than the litigation as a whole
A.