With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in the record that he was so upset as to be acting irrationally, and there is nothing in the record that suggests that the officers obtained the defendant’s consent by means of duress, coercion, or intimidation. In particular, there is nothing in the record that suggests that the officers pressured him to open the lock box or that he was adamant in stating that the passport was not in it. Compare United States v. Jones, 523 F. 3d 31, 38 (1st Cir. 2008) (arrest of defendant in his hotel room by “ten to fifteen” law enforcement officers, with “guns drawn,” did not render his subsequent consent to the officers to search the room involuntary where “there was no indication” the defendant “was mistreated” by the officers); Commonwealth v. Gonzalez, 60 Mass.App.Ct. 903, 904 & n.5 (2003) (<HOLDING>). See also Commonwealth v. Franco, 419 Mass.

A: holding that consent given immediately after an illegal stop was vitiated by the illegality
B: holding consent was given involuntarily when a reasonable person would not have felt they had the choice to withhold consent to search
C: holding verbal consent given by woman after being placed under arrest was voluntaiy
D: holding there is no consent as a matter of law where the consent was given under coercion
C.