With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". agreement between the parties was labeled a “layaway agreement”); Conn. Bank & Trust Co. v. Schidelman (In re Bosson), 432 F.Supp. 1013, 1021 (D.Conn.1977) (stating that contractual language providing that title remains with seller until all car payments are made merely creates a security interest); Rome Family, 407 B.R. at 75 (“[PJursuant to § 2-401, title passes to the buyer upon delivery of the goods, and the seller’s interest is limited to a reservation of a security interest, notwithstanding any contractual agreement between the parties that the seller will retain title.”); Payne, 2006 WL 3524442, at *1 (limiting the seller’s interest in the car to a security interest even though the seller’s name appeared on the vehicle’s certifícate of title); Riddle Farm, 2004 WL 3510119, at *2 (<HOLDING>); Pro Page Partners, LLC v. Message Express

A: holding that although a financing statement may be used to assist in the interpretation of the security agreement the financing statement does not create a security interest and cannot extend a security interest beyond what has been unambiguously described in a security agreement
B: holding that even if an agreement that title would pass once financing was obtained the most a creditor could claim was a security interest once the good was delivered
C: holding courts must look to the law of the state in which the security interest was created to determine if creditor retains a purchase money security interest despite refinancing
D: holding that the intent to create a security interest in afteracquired property must be ascertained and judged by the language of the security agreement not the financing statement
B.