With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of laches in these circumstances and the appropriate remedy that flows therefrom. III. A. Because foreclosure proceedings seek primary or principal relief which is equitable in nature, a complaint in foreclosure is properly cognizable in the General Equity part of the Chancery Division. See R. 4:3 — 1(a)(1); Weinstein, New Jersey Practice § 28.5 (2000) (“A foreclosure action seeking a sale of the mortgaged premises ... should ordinarily be brought in the Chancery Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey”). And, it has long been the law of New Jersey that an application to open, vacate or otherwise set aside a foreclosure judgment or proceedings subsequent thereto is subject to an abuse of discretion standard. Wiktorowicz v. Stesko, 134 N.J. Eq. 383, 386, 35 A.2d 696 (E. & A.1944) (<HOLDING>). We see no reason to depart from settled

A: holding that in proceedings in foreclosure  the application to open the decree was addressed to the discretion of the court  and that appellate courts will not undertake in such a case to review the order for the purpose of determining whether it shall substitute its discretion for that of the court of chancery quoting masionis v romel 101 nj eq 780 782 138 a 892 e  a1927
B: holding that where the statute in question required that the measure of fair market value shall be as determined by the secretary  the court cannot substitute its own discretion for properly exercised administrative discretion
C: holding that in its review of the irs exercise of discretion the court is limited to a review of the administrative record
D: holding the selection of the person to be appointed guardian is a matter which is committed largely to the discretion of the appointing court and an appellate court will interfere with the exercise of this discretion only in case of a clear abuse
A.