With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to admonitions from the court and from counsel that Rowell not cause a mistrial by testifying about other bad acts that Cousin had committed. Rowell foreshadowed in chambers, however, what he would later assert in court: that the district attorney and Rowell's attorney had instructed him to implicate Cousin falsely. 8 . Rowell testified, "My lawyer came to me with a file, and he said the only [w]ay I can get you lesser time is if I testify against Shar-eef Cousin on a murder charge.” 9 . The colloquy was as follows: "[Question:] Now, do you also remember telling homicide detectives ... about this conversation you had with Shareef Cousin on March 4, 1995? [Answer:] I only told them what you all told me to say.” 10 . See Hill v. City of New York, 45 F.3d 653, 662-63 (2d Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); see also Milstein v. Cooley, 257 F.3d 1004,

A: holding that the existence of probable cause determines whether fabrication is investigatory or advocatory
B: holding that the existence of probable cause in a  1983 case is a jury question
C: holding that the purpose of a preliminary examination is to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a crime was committed and whether there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed it
D: holding fabrication not protected because no probable cause
A.