With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Substantial evidence is defined as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Id. Under this standard, we must affirm an agency decision supported by substantial evidence “even if the proof preponderates against it.” Id. DIB claimants must show that they were disabled on or before their last-insured date. Moore v. Barnhart, 405 F.3d 1208, 1211 (11th Cir.2005). Consequently, to prove her eligibility for DIB, Mason had to prove that she suffered from a disability between her alleged onset of December 2004, and her last-insured date of December 2005. “If a claimant becomes disabled [a]fter [s]he has lost [her] insured status, [her] claim must be denied despite [her] disability.” Demandre v. Califano, 591 F.2d 1088, 1090 (5th Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>). The Social Security regulations establish a

A: holding that the evidence that the defendant violated a probation condition was not competent and substantial because the state presented only hearsay evidence
B: holding that there was sufficient evidence of innocent intent where both the states and defendants evidence showed that the defendant was coerced at knifepoint to enter
C: holding that substantial evidence supported the aljs denial where the evidence showed that the claimant was insured until june 1973 but the medical evidence showed that his condition did not become disabling until some point in 1974
D: holding that an aljs decision to discount a subjective claim of drowsiness was supported by substantial evidence where the alj noted among other things that the claimant did not appear drowsy at the hearing
C.