With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". cause”). b. Iowa Code § 20.7(3) In this case, Lockhart asserts that Iowa Code § 20.7(3) places a statutory limitation on the School Board’s ability to terminate him, thus negating the presumption that his employment was at will. The relevant portion of Iowa Code § 20.7 is as follows: 20.7 Public employer rights Public employers shall have, in addition to all powers, duties, and rights established by constitutional provision, statute, ordinance, charter, or special act, the exclusive power, duty, and right to: í}í í{« ífe í}{ 3. Suspend or discharge public employees for proper cause. Iowa Code § 20.7(3) (enacted in 1974 as part of the Iowa Public Employment Relations Act). Lockhart contends that this statute specifically limits his discharge to discharge for “proper cause, 6 (Iowa 1979) (<HOLDING>); and see Iowa City Community Sch. Dist. v.

A: holding that arkansas state officials were bound by the supreme courts prior decision that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional in a case involving four different states that employed a similar system
B: holding that a conviction for a lascivious act with a child in violation of iowa code  7098 was a crime of violence
C: holding that  2073 was not inconsistent with the provision regarding the discharge of a teacher employed by public schools iowa code  27927
D: holding that  2073 expressly grants school districts the power to suspend teachers for proper cause for disciplinary reasons provided an iowa code  27927 discharge proceeding has been initiated
C.