With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of direct assistance and relief. 4 Arthur Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 86.34, at 16-60 (1994); accord Crider v. Zurich Ins. Co., 380 U.S. 39, 41, 85 S.Ct. 769, 770, 13 L.Ed.2d 641, 643 (1965) (“The state where the employee lives has perhaps even a larger concern, for it is there that he is expected to return; and it is on his community that the impact of the injury is apt to be most keenly felt.”); Cardillo v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 330 U.S. 469, 476, 67 S.Ct. 801, 806, 91 L.Ed. 1028, 1035 (1947) (recognizing that a state has a legitimate interest in providing workers’ compensation benefits to its residents when they sustain an out-of-state injury); Dissell v. Trans World Airlines, 511 A.2d 441, 442 (Me.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 948, 107 S.Ct. 433, 93 L.Ed.2d 382 (1986) (<HOLDING>). Indeed, the Iowa legislature may have thought

A: holding workers compensation claimant failed to prove statute requiring jccs approval for payment of attorneys fees was inadequate to achieve legitimate state interest in protecting workers
B: holding that employees residency in maine alone gave rise to a legitimate and substantial interest such that maine had jurisdiction of the employees outofstate injury under its workers compensation statute
C: recognizing retaliatory discharge claim where employer prevented employees exercise of workers compensation rights because of employees intention to file claim
D: holding that probation department employees are not county employees
B.