With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ¶ 11 Father next argues the family court’s findings are inadequate to satisfy the requirements of A.R.S. § 25-403(B). In making a custody determination, the court must consider the factors enumerated in A.R.S. § 25-403(A) regarding the children’s best interests. Further, A.R.S. § 25-403(B) requires that, “[i]n a contested custody case, the court shall make specific findings on the record about all relevant factors and the reasons for which the decision is in the best interests of the child[ren].” (Emphasis added.) ¶ 12 In Diezsi, this court held that it was an abuse of discretion for the lower court to fail to make the requisite findings pursuant to § 25-403. 201 Ariz. at 526, ¶ 5, 38 P.3d at 1191. See also Owen v. Blackhawk, 206 Ariz. 418, 421-22, ¶ 12, 79 P.3d 667, 670-71 (App. 2003) (<HOLDING>); Downs v. Scheffler, 206 Ariz. 496, 501, ¶ 19,

A: holding that the family court abused its discretion in changing the primary residential parent and altering the parenting time schedule without making the required findings on the record in a contested custody case brought under the relocation statute ars  25408
B: holding that the lower courts findings were insufficient as a matter of law and remanding for the court to make the findings required under ars  25403
C: holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the best interest of the children require the continuation of primary physical custody with defendant and secondary custody with plaintiff and the trial court failed to make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law for this court to determine whether the guidelines were followed
D: holding district court abused its discretion in admitting state court findings of fact
A.