With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". § 4000(a), while driving on Edwards Air Force Base. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo questions of law, United States v. Yacoubian, 24 F.3d 1, 3 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm. Morgan contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction over his motor vehicle offense because 32 C.F.R. § 210.3, which made Cal. Veh.Code § 4000(a) applicable on the military base, represents an unconstitutional delegation of Congress’ rule-making authority. The district court properly affirmed Morgan’s conviction and fine because 32 C.F.R. § 210.3, when coupled with 32 C.F.R. § 634.25, is an appropriate exercise of Congress’ delegation of rule-making authority as granted by 40 U.S.C. § 318. See Bicycle Trails Council of Mann v. Babbitt, 82 F.3d 1445, 1451 (9th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>) (quoting Chevron USA, Inc. v. Natural

A: holding the court will not disturb the decision of the abcmr unless it was arbitrary capricious contrary to law or unsupported by substantial evidence
B: holding that legislative regulations are given controlling weight unless they are arbitrary capricious or manifestly contrary to the statute
C: holding that regulations promulgated pursuant to an express congressional grant of rulemaking authority will be upheld unless they are arbitrary capricious or manifestly contrary to the statute
D: holding that a moiety award will be upheld unless it is arbitrary or capricious
C.