With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". See id. § 3B1.3 cmt. n.3 (explaining that the enhancement should apply because “the defendant assumes a position of trust, relative to the victim, that provides the defendant with the same opportunity to commit a difficult-to-detect crime”). This understanding is confirmed by the cases cited with approval in the application note, each of which involved a direct relationship of trust between the defendant and the victim. See Gill, 99 F.3d at 489 (applying enhancement to defendant posing as licensed psychologist, explaining that “in real life terms, [the defendant] occupied a position of trust relative to his counseling patients, and that [the defendant] took advantage of the patients’ reliance on his claimed status as a psychologist to further his fraud scheme”); Queen, 4 F.3d at 929 (<HOLDING>). Application Note 3 is therefore consistent

A: holding that employer controlled the victims will at least in part by using his position as the victims employer
B: holding that abuse of trust enhancement applied where defendant had discretion to engage in commodities transactions on victims behalf without victims supervision
C: holding that jury may consider victims mental capacity in determining whether defendant acted with victims knowledge and consent
D: recognizing that the imposter investment advisorbroker in that case assumed a position of trust with his victims
D.