With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". § 7 4 4101 to - 4102 (1993), city court jurisdiction and powers derive from the state statutes and they are included in the hierarchy of the state judicial system. Mont.Code Ann. §§ 3-11-101 to -303' (Í993). Mont.Code Ann. § 3-1-101 states: "The following are courts of justice of this state: ... (4) the municipal courts; (5) the justice’s courts; (6) the city courts....” 3 . See Mont.Code Ann. §§ 3-5-303, 3-6-110, 46-17-311 (1993). Thus, a city judge's decisions are neither final nor exclusively local. 4 . See, e.g., Johnson v. Moore, 958 F.2d 92, 94 (5th Cir.1992) (finding no municipal liability for local judge's sending plaintiff to jail without assistance of counsel because this act was judicial, not administrative); Woods v. City of Michigan City, 940 F.2d 275, 279 (7th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>); Owens, 877 F.2d at 952 (holding that the

A: holding that the nuisance action was properly brought in the county where the nuisance was being created and stating that the subject of the suit was local and that a local action must be commenced in the county of its locality unless authorized by statute to be commenced elsewhere
B: holding that the lehigh county sheriff is a county officer rather than a state officer
C: holding the city and county not liable for the local judges bond directive because the judge was acting as an officer of the indiana judicial system
D: holding that the bond was intended to and did substantially comply with sjection 71323 therefore because its conditions were not broader and more protective than the statute required the contention that the bond was a common law bond failed
C.