With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (N.D.N.Y.2000); Phipps v. New York State Dep’t of Labor, 53 F.Supp.2d 551, 558 (N.D.N.Y.1999). Because the State of New York has not consented to suit in federal court and the Department of Transportation is an arm of the State, plaintiffs claims for money damages against the State of New York, the NYSDOT, and the individual defendants in their official capacities must be dismissed. See Garcia v. S.U.N.Y. Health Sciences Center of Brooklyn, 280 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir.2001); Richman v. Pediatric Serv. Group, LLP, 222 F.Supp.2d 207, 209 (N.D.N.Y.2002); Hayut, 127 F.Supp.2d at 340; Phipps, 53 F.Supp.2d at 558. B. Individual Liability Under Title VII and the ADA It also is settled that there is no individual liability under Title VII. See Wrighten v. Glowski, 232 F.3d 119, 120 (2d Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295, 1313-17

A: holding that individual employees are not liable under title vii
B: holding that a title vii plaintiff could not hold coworkers liable in their individual capacities under title vii
C: holding that there is no individual liability under title vii
D: holding individual employees may be liable under title vii
C.