With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". U.S. 128, 134, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). 44 . Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398, 403, 126 S.Ct. 1943, 164 L.Ed.2d 650 (2006) (internal citations omitted). 45 . United States v. Garcia, 56 F.3d 418, 422 (2d Cir.1995) (emphasis added). Accord Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 222, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973) ("[A] search conducted pursuant to a valid consent is constitutionally permissible.”). 46 . Garcia, 56 F.3d at 422 (quoting United States v. Wilson, 11 F.3d 346, 352 (2d Cir.1993)). 47 . See Schneckloth, 412 U.S. at 241-42, 93 S.Ct. 2041 (explaining the differences between criminal procedure rights associated with trial, and criminal procedure rights associated with search). See also Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 117 S.Ct. 417, 136 L.Ed.2d 347 (1996) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Drayton, 536 U.S. 194, 122

A: holding that a search can be consented to even if a defendant does not subjectively feel free to leave
B: holding that the fourth amendment does not require that a lawfully seized defendant must be advised that he is free to go before his consent to search will be recognized as voluntary
C: holding inter alia that a search can be consented to even if a defendant to be advised that he is free to go
D: holding that a defendant need not be advised of the right to terminate questioning at any time
C.