With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". likely to be given to minorities because cocaine base is less expensive than cocaine powder. Thus, minorities are disparately impacted. Miller draws support from a Minnesota state district court case which held that a Minnesota statute imposing more severe penalties on individuals convicted of offenses involving cocaine base than those involving cocaine powder violated the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution because of its disparate impact on blacks. See Minnesota v. Russell, No. 89067067, Order (4th Judicial District Dec. 27, 1990); Minnesota v. Russell, No. 89067067, Supplemental Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (4th Judicial District Jan. 29, 1991). Miller’s due process claim is without merit. United States v. Buckner, 894 F.2d 975, 978-80 (8th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). Miller’s equal protection argument, which we

A: holding that  841bls mandatory minimum provisions were rationally related to the objectives of protecting public health and welfare
B: holding 1001 ratio is rationally related to objective of protecting public welfare because cocaine base is more dangerous to society than cocaine powder
C: holding that sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine is constitutional
D: holding that the term cocaine base in 21 usc  841b1 refers to cocaine in its chemically basic form which includes but is not limited to crack cocaine
B.