With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to claims for damages under statutory rights created by Congress. Accordingly, we turn to an analysis of Alden in light of the Mannings’ claim. {24} Alden and its progeny stand for the proposition that state constitutional sovereign immunity bars individual claims for damages that are based on legislation passed by Congress pursuant to its Article I powers. Alden, 527 U.S. at 754, 119 S.Ct. 2240; Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Fla., 517 U.S. 44, 59, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996); see also Gill v. Pub. Employees Ret. Bd., 2004-NMSC-016, 135 N.M. 472, 90 P.3d 491 (discussing the holding in Alden while evaluating a claim for injunctive relief asserted against the State under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act); Cockrell, 2002-NMSC-009, ¶¶ 14-15, 132 N.M. 156, 45 P.3d 876 (<HOLDING>). Specifically, the issue in Alden, 527 U.S. at

A: holding right to liquidated damages under fair labor standards act nonwaivable
B: holding that sovereign immunity barred a post alden claim under the fair labor standards act for money damages asserted against the state in state court
C: holding a claim for injunction but not money damages against a state officer for a violation of the age discrimination in employment act enacted under article i section 8 of the united states constitution was not barred by sovereign immunity under the ex parte young exception
D: holding that the otca limitations period applied to a claim alleging a breach of the fair labor standards act by the state
B.