With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Sentencing Commission amended the Guidelines to require consideration of the expected costs of imprisonment and/or supervised release as one of several factors in calculating fines for individual defendants. U.S. Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, App. C, amend. 572. 15 . See Blagman v. White, 112 F.Supp.2d 534, 538, n. 6 (E.D.Va.2000) (citing Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 223, 110 S.Ct. 1028, 108 L.Ed.2d 178 (1990) (reasonableness standard applies whenever the needs of prison administration implicate constitutional rights); Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89-91, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987) (laying out a four factor test for determining reasonableness in the prison context)). 16 . See also, Woodley v. Department of Corrections, 74 F.Supp.2d 623, 627 (E.D.Va.1999)

A: holding that a paralee who is released on mandatory parole is still technically a prisoner and thus entitled to goodtime credit if placed in a halfway house or other correctional facility under the authority of the parole board
B: holding that there is no due process right to appellate review
C: holding that no due process or other constitutional violation occurred when a virginia parolee was required to pay for room board and other costs incurred while serving out his sentence at a halfway house and noting that what little law there is on the subject supports the proposition that a state may require a prisoner to pay the costs of supervision as a condition of parole and that there is no supreme court case holding or even hinting to the contrary
D: holding that there was no legal right to court review of parole board decision because there is no legal right to release on parole
C.