With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by the ALJ. The Authority then brought this appeal of DEP’s ruling. Standard of Review In an appeal from final administrative action, this court reviews the findings of fact made by the ALJ and adopted by the administrative agency to determine whether they are supported by competent, substantial evidence. § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004); see also Pauline v. Lee, 147 So.2d 359, 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); Reily Enters., LLC v. Fla. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., 990 So.2d 1248, 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Maynard v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 609 So.2d 143, 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). This court “shall not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative law judge as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact.” § 120.68(10); see also Pauline, 147 So.2d at 363 (<HOLDING>); Maynard, 609 So.2d at 145 (“[T]he credibility

A: holding that court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency
B: holding that this court will not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative fact finder who heard the testimony and was in a position to evaluate the credibility of witnesses because evidence is weighed by the administrative agency and not by the courts
C: holding that the weight and credibility to be given to the opinions of expert witnesses is uniquely within the province of the fact finder  in this instance the trial court citation omitted
D: holding that the court is not to undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence make credibility determinations or substitute its judgment for that of the agency
B.