With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". attack from another forum.”). Similarly, avoidance of transfers is specifically defined by statute as part of the core jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and a matter over which the court holds exclusive jurisdiction. In this proceeding, avoidance is sought solely under a provision of the Bankruptcy Code and is a cause of action that may only exist within a bankruptcy case. As such this cause of action is within this court’s exclusive jurisdiction. See Yellow Cab Cooperative Ass’n v. Mathis (In re Yellow Cab Cooperative Ass’n), 185 B.R. 844, 847 (Bankr.D.Colo.1995) (finding that an action under Section 549 was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court); General Instrument Corp. v. Financial & Business Services, Inc. (In re Finley), 62 B.R. 361, 368 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1986) (<HOLDING>). As to the cause of action asserted for breach

A: holding that claims under 11 usc  362h must be brought in the bankruptcy court rather than in the district court which only has appellate jurisdiction over bankruptcy cases
B: holding that bankruptcy court has exclusive jurisdiction over recovery of preferences and fraudulent conveyances
C: holding that federal jurisdiction over rico claims is concurrent and not exclusive
D: holding the circuit court has exclusive jurisdiction over condemnation proceedings
B.