With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v. Pioneer National Title Insurance Co., 186 Ill.App.3d 238, 132 Ill. Dec. 617, 540 N.E.2d 357 (1989), a mortgage had been deemed fraudulent because the mortgagor never signed the mortgage or held title to the mortgaged property. The Illinois court held that the loss caused by the fraudulent mortgage was covered, stating that “[njotwithstanding that the policy ... insured [the situation] where the title was vested otherwise than as stated in schedule A ..., the1 policy also covered loss or damage resulting from the invalidity or unenforce-ability of the mortgage lien.” Id., 132 Ill. Dec. at 620, 540 N.E.2d at 360 (emphasis added) (citing Bank of Miami Beach, 239 So.2d at 97); see also Citicorp Sav. v. Stewart Title Guar. Co., 840 F.2d 526, 529-30 (7th Cir.1988) (applying Illinois law) (<HOLDING>); Ferrell, 213 So.2d at 520 (holding that a

A: holding that the mortgagors legal incompetence at the time of the execution of the mortgage was a covered risk under the title policys invalidity or unenforeeability provision
B: holding that a mortgage or modification of a mortgage is not a good or a service under the dtpa
C: holding that the mortgagee named in the mortgage at the time of the mortgages execution acquired the legal title to the property
D: holding that a mortgagee could enforce mortgage covenants requiring the mortgagors to keep the property free of encumbrances even after it foreclosed by advertisement and purchased the property for the full amount of the mortgage debt because the mortgage covenants concerned title to the mortgaged property rather than repayment of the debt
A.