With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". on which she was indicted. On the videotape, DeSalvo claimed knowledge and expertise in furnishing Medicare providers with substantial, no-risk benefits by subscribing to lost charge audit services. The videotape illustrated DeSalvo’s promotion of and proficiency in lost charge audits, thus tending to show that when she previously submitted false Medicare claims, she knew them to be false. Similar cases have found applicability of Rule 404(b) in less persuasive circumstances. See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1356 (9th Cir.) (finding that developer’s subsequent statements on land deals implied knowledge of previously fraudulent conduct), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830, 99 S.Ct. 105, 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978); see also United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1399 (9th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234, 111 S.Ct. 2861,

A: holding that despite differences in method evidence of subsequent drug smuggling could be admitted to show prior knowledge and intent
B: holding that evidence of a 10yearold drug conviction was properly admitted to show intent in a prosecution for possession with intent to distribute
C: holding prior drug convictions relevant to show that defendant had knowledge and intent necessary to possess drugs at issue in case
D: holding there was no rule 404b violation where the evidence was admitted to show knowledge and knowledge was an element of the crime charged
A.