With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". require the Charles County Court to grant Plaintiff a hearing on his motions as Plaintiff claims, see Compl. ¶41, as the Rule states that a hearing is required only if the trial court grants a motion for a new trial or to amend judgment. Md. Rule 3-311(d). Furthermore, the Circuit Court for Charles County already upheld the District Court’s decision not to grant Plaintiff a post-judgment hearing-that decision may not be collaterally attacked in this Court. See supra § 111(A). Finally, 18 U.S.C. § 241 is a criminal statute that provides no basis for an individual to bring a private, civil action. See Risley v. Hawk, 918 F.Supp. 18, 21 (D.D.C.1996) (explicitly holding that 18 U.S.C. § 241 does not create a private cause of action); Wiggins v. Hitchens, 853 F.Supp. 505, 511 (D.D.C.1994) (<HOLDING>); 18 U.S.C. § 241, Notes of Decisions fn. 33.

A: holding that denial of divorce and corresponding equitable distribution does not preclude a partition action by res judicata
B: holding that a criminal statute does not provide a corresponding civil cause of action
C: recognizing cause of action
D: recognizing the cause of action
B.