With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". La. Code Crim. Proc. art. 922(B) (providing that the court of appeal’s judgment becomes final under Louisiana law fourteen days after the rendition of judgment in all cases in which an application for a writ of review is not filed with the Louisiana Supreme Court), and supra note 2 and accompanying text, with Roberts, 319 F.3d at 693 n. 15 (noting that the judgment of an intermediate court of appeals is not final under Texas law until the mandate has issued), and id. at 694-95 (rejecting the argument that the mandate-issuance date should determine finality under AEDPA). 4 . AEDPA’s one-year limitations period is tolled during the pendency of a state habeas application. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). 5 . See Lawrence v. Florida, 549 U.S. 327, 331-36, 127 S.Ct. 1079, 166 L.Ed.2d 924 (2007) (<HOLDING>). 6 . The entirety of Scott’s challenge was as

A: holding statute of limitations for filing petition for postconviction relief not tolled by general savings statute tolling limited to reasons enumerated in state postconviction relief act
B: holding that the limitations period is likewise not tolled during the pendency of a certiorari petition to the supreme court
C: holding that aedpas oneyear period of limitations does not support a delay of filing of habeas petition by capital defendant
D: holding that aedpas oneyear limitations period is not tolled during the pendency of a petition for certiorari to the united states supreme court that seeks review of a state courts denial of postconviction relief
D.