With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the invocation of the right to counsel entails terminating all questioning “until counsel has been made available [or] unless the accused [ ] initiates further communication, exchanges, or conversations with the police.” Edwards, supra, 451 U.S. at 484-85, 101 S.Ct. at 1885, 68 L.Ed.2d at 386. If an accused does initiate a conversation after invoking his rights, that conversation may be admissible if the initiation constitutes a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of the accused’s rights. Miranda, supra, 384 U.S. at 444, 86 S.Ct. at 1612, 16 L.Ed.2d at 707. The State bears a “heavy burden” of demonstrating that the waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Hartley, supra, 103 N.J. at 260, 511 A.2d 80; see also State v. Galloway, 133 N.J. 631, 654, 628 A.2d 735 (1993) (<HOLDING>). C. The first question is whether defendant’s

A: holding that territorial jurisdiction must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt
B: holding state must prove voluntariness of confession beyond a reasonable doubt
C: holding the determination of the voluntariness of a confession is a determination uninfluenced by the truth or falsity of the confession
D: holding that the state must prove juvenile delinquency beyond a reasonable doubt
B.