With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is not necessary for the Court to deny a motion to amend on the basis of undue delay, which is inherently prejudicial to the opposing party. See Fire & Police Pension, 778 F.3d at 247. In any event,- the harm here to Cyberonics from the lengthy delays and repeated efforts to amend the complaint are sufficient to establish the requisite degree of prejudice. - Under the circumstances, Hagerty’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint will be denied because of undue delay. III. Cyberonics’ Motion Compel Arbitration and Dismiss the Remaining Two Counts A. Legal Standard The Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-301, governs the enforcement of written arbitration agreements. See Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105, 119, 121, S.Ct. 1302, 149 L.Ed.2d 234 (2001) (<HOLDING>). It was enacted in order to reverse

A: holding the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment extends the right to jury trial to defendants in serious criminal cases in state courts
B: holding that the faa extends to employment cases for employees other than those engaged in transportation
C: holding that the district court lacked the authority to compel arbitration  because the faa is inapplicable to employees who are engaged in interstate commerce
D: holding that in the employment context only transportation workers employment contracts are exempted from the faas coverage
B.