With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". course of investigation. The instant case involves an alleged “seizure” that occurred well after the point in time where Place is directly relevant. The plaintiff here is not challenging any action of the defendants until over four months after the plaintiff’s license was removed from a vehicle pursuant to an inventory search, inventoried, and stored. 7 . See, e.g., Riley v. Dorton, 115 F.3d 1159, 1162-64 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 631, 139 L.Ed.2d 611 (1997) (rejecting concept of "continuing seizure” and holding that Fourth Amendment does not apply after a person has been arrested but has not yet been tried; also collecting cases on "continuing seizure”); Wilkins v. May, 872 F.2d 190, 192 (7th Cir.1989) (same); McDowell v. Rogers, 863 F.2d 1302, 1306 (6th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>); see also Albright v. Oliver, 510 U.S. 266,

A: holding that the fourth amendment right implicated in a malicious prosecution action is the right to be free of unreasonable seizure of the person
B: holding fourth amendment protects against use of force while in arresting officers custody until arraignment or formal charge
C: holding that fourth amendment seizure continues throughout the time the person remains in the custody of the arresting officers
D: holding seizure of evidence in plain view reasonable under fourth amendment
C.