With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by the trial court pending a ruling from this court on Appellants’ motion to stay filed herein. ANALYSIS ¶ 9 Appellants present two issues on appeal: whether this residence is subject to partition and, if so, whether the partition order is proper in light of other remedies and adequately protects Appellants’ interests. Partition is Permissible Under Arizona Law ¶ 10 Whether this QPRT-owned property is subject to partition is a question of law that we review de novo. See In re Naarden Trust, 195 Ariz. 526, 528, ¶ 4, 990 P.2d 1085, 1087 (App. 1999). An owner of any interest in real property may seek partition of the property between himself and other owners of the property. Ariz. Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 12-1211; see also McCready v. McCready, 168 Ariz. 1, 3, 810 P.2d 624, 626 (App. 1991) (<HOLDING>). Arizona partition law is governed by statute.

A: recognizing existence of common law right of setoff in oklahoma
B: recognizing that the right of partition is an incident of common ownership
C: holding an award of possession of the marital home is an incident of support
D: recognizing common knowledge exception
B.