With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". such an agreement exist ed—there are no allegations that Howard (the former Chief of the Tribe) acted in concert with Lockamy and Wood (former managers of SCTC); nor that Howard conspired with SCTC and the remaining two Individual Defendants. To the contrary, as we stated above, all the allegations made against the Individual Defendants “relate to decisions made and actions taken by them as the ‘principal managers’ of SCTC,” not as individuals. Order, ROA at 396; see Compl., ROA at 11-12 ¶!¶ 12, 16-17; id. at 14-15 ¶¶ 32-33, 36, 38. There is simply nothing more than conclusory allegations that a civil conspiracy exists, and this is not enough to satisfy the requirement of “concerted action.” See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1965, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (<HOLDING>). In addition, the operation of the

A: holding that plaintiffs complaint failed to state a claim under section 1 of the sherman act
B: holding that same activity violated  2 of the sherman act
C: holding that a sherman act  1 claim requires a complaint with enough factual matter taken as time to suggest that an agreement was made
D: holding ban violated the sherman act
C.