With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". B. Validity of Petitioner’s Marriage Under New York Law Petitioner concedes that his marriage ceremony “was not done according to New York laws [sic ].” (Pet. Mem. at 4.) Nonetheless, Petitioner maintains that his marriage is valid under New York law, because: 1) the marriage was authorized under Polish law, and, therefore, should be recognizable in all jurisdictions (Pet.’s Mem. at 3); and 2) “there is no strict requirement for how marriage should be performed.” (Id. at 9.) Petitioner makes two arguments in support of his position that a marriage authorized under Polish law is valid in New York State. First, Petitioner argues that his consular marriage should be recognized under New York law, because “New York State has a history of recognizing judgments rendered in fo .Ct. 1944) (<HOLDING>). Second, Petitioner relies on Article 25(c) of

A: holding that a ceremonial marriage performed under the laws of a foreign power by a foreign consular officer on united states territory was invalid because it did not comply with the laws of new york state
B: holding state buy american statute unconstitutional because it interfered with federal foreign affairs power emphasizing its effect on foreign commerce
C: holding that a divorce granted at a foreign consulate in new york was not valid for immigration purposes because it did not comply with new york law
D: holding that in the event that parties are from different states and the subject matter is national in scope and where the contract states it shall be deemed to be made under the laws of the state of new york and for all purposes construed in accordance with laws of said state new york law applies as the parties choice of law
A.