With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". A defendant has the constitutional right to decline to testify against himself in a criminal proceeding. See U.S. Const, amend. V; art. I, § 9, Fla. Const. Therefore, “[a]ny comment on, or which is fairly susceptible of being interpreted as referring to, a defendant’s failure to testify is error and is strongly discouraged.” State v. Marshall, 476 So.2d 150, 153 (Fla.1985); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.250 (prosecuting attorney prohibited from commenting on the defendant’s failure to testify on his or her behalf). The “fairly susceptible” test is a “very liberal rule.” Dessaure v. State, 891 So.2d 455 (Fla.2004). Defense counsel’s failure to object to an improper comment by the prosecution may serve as a basis for a post-conviction claim. Darling v. State, 966 So.2d 366, 385 (Fla.2007) (<HOLDING>). Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal

A: holding that failure to object to properly admitted evidence was not deficient performance by trial counsel
B: holding trial counsel was deficient for failing to object to unadjudicated extraneous offenses in a psi report
C: holding that it was not deficient for counsel to fail to object to a standard instruction that had not been invalidated by this court
D: holding the defendant had stated an arguable basis for finding counsel deficient for failing to object to improper prosecutorial comments
D.