With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". have standing to bring claims against all facilities in a nationwide chain, even if the individuals did not visit every facility.” (Pls.’ Mem. at 22.) Indeed, only one of the cases cited by Plaintiffs, Celano v. Marriott Int’l, even involved a nationwide chain, and there the court held that the plaintiffs had standing to sue twenty-six golf courses around the country because the plaintiffs alleged that they had actually been deterred from play ing at these courses. No. 05-4004, 2008 WL 239306, at *7 (ND.Cal. Jan. 28, 2008) (“All three plaintiffs have attempted to arrange tee times at numerous Marriott courses, but have been unable to play because Marriott advised them that it did not provide accessible carts.”); see also Bacon v. City of Richmond, 386 F.Supp.2d 700, 705 (E.D.Va.2005) (<HOLDING>). Unlike Celano or Bacon, however, Plaintiffs

A: holding that plaintiffs had standing to obtain relief against all facilities within a school district not just against the four schools that they attended because ejach plaintiff has expressed a wellfounded interest in attending events at facilities other than the four schools mentioned
B: holding unconstitutional the closing of all the schools in one county
C: holding that a federallyfunded program in which public school teachers provided remedial education to disadvantaged children in parochial schools as well as public schools did not violate the establishment clause
D: holding that the unilateral placement of a student by the parents in an unapproved school is not by itself a bar to tuition reimbursement but public schools may not place students in unapproved schools
A.