With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". presence of slang and non-literal language guides our inquiry. The web pages immediately preceding and following the Knievel photo use slang words such as “hardcore” and “scoping,” and slang phrases such as “throwing down a pose,” “put a few back,” and “hottie of the year,” none of which is intended to be interpreted literally, if indeed they have a literal meaning at all. We think that any reasonable viewer would have interpreted the word “pimp” in the same loose, figurative sense as well. See Yagman, 55 F.3d at 1440. But even if a viewer had interpreted the word “pimp” literally, he or she would have certainly interpreted the photograph and caption, in the context in which they were published, as an attempt at humor. See Hustler Magazine Inc., 485 U.S. at 49, 108 S.Ct. 876(<HOLDING>); Polygram Records, Inc. v. Superior Court, 170

A: holding that farcical interview published in pornographic magazine in which minister admits to a drunken incestuous rendezvous with his mother in an outhouse was not actionable because it could not reasonably be understood as describing actual facts  or actual events in which the minister participated 
B: holding that a plaintiff does not have to possess actual knowledge of all the relevant facts in order for the cause of action to accrue
C: holding that an insurance contract should be construed as a reasonable person in the position of the insured would have understood it and that if the language used in the policy is reasonably susceptible to different constructions it must be given the construction most favorable to the insured
D: holding that clergypenitent privilege applied in statements made during family counseling sessions conducted by lutheran minister with others present
A.