With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". coupled with the petitioner’s "diminished mental capacities,” established prejudice); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 396, 120 S.Ct. 1495, 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000) ("Counsel failed to introduce available evidence that [the petitioner] was ‘borderline mentally retarded' and did not advance beyond sixth grade in school.” (citations omitted)); see also Sears v. Upton, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3259, 3267, 177 L.Ed.2d 1025 (2010) (vacating the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision because it improperly analyzed prejudice and noting that "[a] proper analysis of prejudice under Strickland would have taken into account the newly uncovered evidence of [the petitioner’s] ‘significant’ mental and psychological impairments"); Porter v. McCollum, 558 U.S. 30, 43-44, 130 S.Ct. 447, 175 L.Ed.2d 398 (2009) (<HOLDING>). 97 . See Boyd v. Allen, 592 F.3d 1274, 1299

A: holding that the petitioner established prejudice and noting that the jury might find mitigating the intense stress and mental and emotional toll that extensive combat experience in the korean war took on the petitioner and that the courts did not consider testimony regarding the existence of a brain abnormality and cognitive defects
B: holding that the state courts determination that the petitioner could not show prejudice because he did not allege that the witness was available to testify was a reasonable application of federal law to the facts of the case
C: holding that because the petitioner failed in the petition to set forth facts known to petitioner or state that petitioner has no knowledge of facts regarding the name and address of any judicially appointed guardian or person or agency awarded custody of the child by a court and failed to attach the existing custody order to the petition it was facially defective and did not confer subject matter jurisdiction upon the trial court
D: holding that rule 27 is not appropriate where the petitioner seeks discovery of unknown information that the petitioner hopes will assist it in the future when the petitioner applies for judicial relief
A.