With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". therapy, the order violates the doctrine of separation of powers. The pro bono Attorney Ad Litem attempted to defend the trial court’s order by citing to general law regarding the need to foster attorney-client relationships in this context. That issue is not before us. The order under review excluded travel costs relating to attorney-client matters. Petition granted; order quashed. 1 . This court takes this opportunity to thank the Attorney Ad Litem, Angela Vigil, Esquire, for her professionalism in providing representation to J.B. on a pro bono basis. He ourt violated the separation of powers doctrine when it ordered the Department of Corrections to pay for an interpreter for a defendant who was hearing impaired); Dep’t of Corr. v. Grubbs, 884 So.2d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (<HOLDING>); Dep’t of Children & Family Servs. v.

A: recognizing that virtually all of the studies show  that relatively few juvenile sex offenders are charged with a subsequent sex crime and sexual recidivism of juvenile sexual offenders posttreatment was very rare
B: holding that a private school specializing in treatment and education of juvenile sex offenders was not providing a function that is traditionally the exclusive province of the state
C: holding the trial court violated the separation of powers doctrine when it ordered the office of the state attorney to pay for the costs of mental health experts evaluating the defendant
D: holding the trial court violated the separation of powers doctrine when it ordered the department of corrections to pay for a convicted sex offenders treatment program
D.