With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. Gary Jerome Nealy (Appellant) appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which he challenged his prison sentence of 79.6 months, claiming that the trial court erred in using the 1995 sentencing guidelines in sentencing him for an offense committed on April 6, 1997, pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). He alleged that a corrected score-sheet prepared under the 1994 guidelines would produce a sentencing range of 39.75 to 66.25 months. The state concedes that .Appellant’s offense was committed within the window period during which the 1995 amendments to the sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we reverse the order denying

A: holding that prisoners whose convictions became final on or before april 24 1996 must file their  2255 motions before april 24 1997
B: holding that only those defendants whose offenses occurred between october 1 1995 and may 27 1997 have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the sentencing guidelines addressed by heggs
C: holding that persons challenging a sentence imposed under the 1995 sentencing guidelines have standing to do so if the relevant criminal offense occurred on or after october 1 1995 and before may 25 1997
D: holding that those persons with standing to challenge their sentences under heggs were those whose offenses were committed on or after october 1 1995 and before may 24 1997
D.