With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Congress ratified the ICC’s prior discretionary requirement that common carriers have cargo liability insurance and imposed this requirement on all motor carriers, absent action by the Secretary of Transportation to cancel the insurance requirement altogether. See id. at 528-29, 98 S.Ct. 866. We have difficulty accepting that proposition because Congress, in replacing § 10927(a)(3) with § 13906(a)(3), was not faced with a binding construction by a court or agency finding that § 10927(a)(3) required, any motor carriers to have cargo liability insurance. Such an authoritative interpretation by a court or' agency has been required in cases in which these rules of statutory construction relied on by the district court have been used. See Lorillard, 434 U.S. at 580-81, 98 S.Ct. 866 (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 435

A: holding that when congress included provisions of compulsory testimony act of 1893 in the emergency price control act of 1942 it necessarily adopted settled judicial construction of the 1893 act
B: holding that congress incorporation of jury provisions of the fair labor standards act into the age discrimination in employment act necessarily ratified and adopted longstanding judicial construction of those provisions
C: holding claims based on the fair labor standards act subject to arbitration
D: holding that the age discrimination in employment act was not preempted by the nlra
B.