With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that plaintiff exhibited an antalgic gait, moved slowly, and used double-braced canes to assist him. These observations, without more, are not the type of information from a treating physician which will be provided great weight under 20 C.F.R. § 404.1513(b). Additionally, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(a)(2) defines medical opinions as assertions involving judgments about a patient’s “symptoms, diagnosis and prognosis.” Dr. Naum diagnosed plaintiff with spondylolisthesis, bulging at L5-S1, obesity, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac dysrhythmias, and tobacco addiction. Dr. Naum recorded medical evidence of a slight spasm of the left paraspinal muscle on palpatation as well as decreased sensory to light touch i Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 482 F.3d 873, 877 (6th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>). Since Dr. Naum made no medical judgments, the

A: holding that doctors opinions are not due much weight when based solely on reports made by a patient that the alj found to be incredible
B: holding that the alj erred by rejecting a treating physicians opinion in favor of opinions issued by nontreating doctors without providing a sufficient rationale
C: holding that nontreating physicians opinions are entitled to little weight when contradictory to treating physicians opinions and will not constitute substantial evidence standing alone
D: holding that alj properly rejected opinions based on invalid objective studies
A.