With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". relief no later than ten days after the judgment is entered. Id. § 4(a)(4)(A)(vi); Searles v. Dechant, 393 F.3d 1126, 1129 (10th Cir. 2004). In this case, Ms. Williams’s September 8 motion did not toll the time limit for filing a notice of appeal as to the court’s August 8 judgment because it was not filed within ten days. Accordingly, her time limit for filing a notice of appeal as to the August 8 judgment expired on October 10. Since she did not file her notice of appeal until December 8 it was untimely, and we therefore lack jurisdic tion to review the August 8 judgment and underlying Contempt Order. See id. at 1130 (noting that untimely notice of appeal is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court); Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). The notice of appeal was timely, however,

A: holding that an appeal from a denial of a rule 59e motion should have been construed as seeking review of the underlying judgment
B: holding that a coa is required to appeal the denial of a rule 60b motion from a judgment in a  2254 proceeding
C: holding that the standard of review is abuse of discretion and an appeal from denial of rule 60b relief does not bring up the underlying judgment for review
D: holding that appeal from denial of rule 60b motion raised for review only the district courts order of denial and not the underlying judgment itself
D.