With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that at the time of the stipulation “she would be on her own for housing,” whereas at the current time (June 2004), she was in “a long term relationship with a financially secure partner, several vacations, new vehicles and multiple homes.” With one exception, we agree with husband that the affidavit was sufficient to state a case for modification under the standards we have announced above and to obtain an evidentiary hearing. ¶ 38. The one exception is that the motion and affidavit did not show that the former spouse’s financial circumstances were unanticipated. As she argues, her circumstances at the time of the family court hearing were exactly those present at the time of the stipulation or, as in Gil, a logical extension of those circumstances. 151 Vt. at 600, 563 A.2d at 626 (<HOLDING>). As obligor admits, wife’s cohabitation had

A: holding that it was not unanticipated that cohabitating parties would eventually share expenses
B: holding that it may not
C: holding that it is not
D: holding parties to an exculpatory clause where the parties intent is clear
A.