With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". on the petition at which two employees of the Jefferson-Blount-St. Clair Mental Health Authority testified that, mainly to avoid confusing the children and disrupting their relationship with the mother, the children’s visitation with the former custodians should be at the discretion of the mother. Following the trial, the juvenile court entered a judgment on December 9, 2009, modifying the former custodians’ visitation to one weekend a month. The mother filed a post-judgment motion, which the juvenile court denied, prompting this appeal. On appeal, the mother argues solely that the juvenile court erred in granting any visitation to the former custodians because, she says, such an order violates her custodial rights, see Shoemaker v. Shoemaker, 563 So.2d 1032, 1033 (Ala.Civ.App.1990) (<HOLDING>), and her constitutional rights, see Troxel v.

A: holding that psychological parent was not entitled to custody or visitation
B: holding that parent has custodial right to prevent visitation with nonparent
C: holding that court in habeas petition has no authority to condition visitation right of parent upon payment for support and maintenance
D: recognizing right of fit parent to prevent visitation by grandparents which right can only be overridden by court based on evidence that the prevention of the visitation would harm the child
B.