With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy;" (3) the arbitrators exhibited "evident partiality” or "corruption;” or (4) the arbitrators were guilty of "misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown,” or guilty of "any other misbehavior" that prejudiced the rights of any party. 9 U.S.C. § 10(a). Banco does not argue that any of these other provisions apply. 11 . Banco claims that it is an instrumentality of a foreign state under the FSIA because it is wholly-owned by the government of the Republic of Uruguay. See Pet. Mem. at 5 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1603). Although MMO insists that "Banco has not set forth adequate grounds to assert that it is a foreign sovereign,” it accepts "for the purposes of this motion only that Banco is an Ur -*3 (<HOLDING>); but see Home Indemnity Co., 1997 WL 773712,

A: holding that arbitration award is binding on the parties
B: holding that arbitration panels order requiring defendant to post an interim letter of credit was reviewable award under the faa
C: holding that arbitration panel did not violate fundamental fairness when it issued an interim award directing a defendant to post prejudgment security after holding an organizational meeting at which it received considered and discussed the parties statements of issues and heard verbal statements by the parties representatives
D: holding that faa was inapplicable where parties involved in action are not parties to an arbitration agreement under which issues are referable to arbitration
C.