With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and we do not consider grounds for objection not raised in the trial court. Lewis v. State, 205 Ga. App. 29 (421 SE2d 339) (1992). The only ground preserved for appeal is the relevance of the street value testimony. Decided November 30, 1995. Richard A. Coleman, for appellant. Garry T. Moss, District Attorney, Cecelia Harris, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. The evidence of street value is probative in the sense that it may have explained Edwards’ extreme nervousness when Bishop first stopped the vehicle, and allowed the jury to decide how plausible it would be for someone other than Edwards to have concealed cocaine worth millions of dollars behind the rear seat of Edwards’ car without his knowledge. See Scott v. State, 170 Ga. App. 409, 411 (3) (317 SE2d 282) (1984) (<HOLDING>). Thus, this enumeration has no merit. 9.

A: holding that where defendant denied knowledge of the cocaine in his bag it was not error to allow testimony of its street and wholesale value
B: holding that where a defendant left his duffel bag at his cousins house and authorized the cousin to use the bag the cousin clearly had authority to consent to its search
C: holding evidence of prior drug sales admissible under 404b to show knowledge and intent where defendant claimed he did not know that the gym bag he took possession of contained two kilograms of cocaine
D: holding that the owner of a shoulder bag located on the front seat of his girlfriends car had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the bag and its contents
A.