With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Va. 571, 9 S.E.2d 454, 458 (1940). The Virginia Supreme Court has not had occasion to decide this question, and as a result, this court must interpret Virginia law. (a) Background While the precise issue in this case has arisen recently in a number of Virginia state courts, no judicial consensus has emerged. The plaintiff’s argument carr GV96001893 (Charlottesville Gen. Dist. Ct.1996) (same); Babb v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 2:95cv630 (E.D.Va. March 7, 1996) (permitting plaintiff to recover only the discounted medical fees paid by her health insurers). Analogous issues have been decided in bankruptcy cases where personal injury plaintiffs sought to recover medical expenses subsequently discharged in bankruptcy. See Walker v. Long, No. LU-3591 (City of Richmond Cir. Ct. Oet.20, 1993) (<HOLDING>); Morganthal v. Piper, CL 94-2496 (Va. Beach

A: holding that plaintiff could recover medical fees not actually paid by the insurance company pursuant to an insurance contract
B: holding that statute does not alleviate plaintiffs burden to provide additional evidence that medical bills were reasonable and necessary
C: holding that state did not submit sufficient evidence to establish amount of restitution to victim for medical bills incurred when it did not introduce any medical bills
D: holding that plaintiff could not recover medical bills that were discharged in bankruptcy
D.