With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". benefits for the plan may n not adequately pursue relief on behalf of the ESOP. LaSalle also argues that plaintiff cannot alternatively plead so as to state claims for both damages arising from a breach of fiduciary duty and for denial of benefits. As stated above, plaintiff concedes that any claim for denial of benefits against LaSalle must be dismissed. LaSalle argues that count I should be dis missed anyway, so as to discourage artful pleading. The cases defendant relies on, however, stand only for the proposition that a plaintiff may not use a claim for breach of fiduciary duty to get around the ERISA statute if it is not otherwise eligible to file a claim for denial of benefits. See Coyne & Delany Co. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Virginia, Inc., 102 F.3d 712 (4th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Here, because plaintiffs are beneficiaries of

A: holding plaintiff may sue federal agents for money damages for violation of his constitutional rights
B: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue
C: holding that fiduciaries may not sue for benefits simply by using section 502a2
D: holding that plaintiffs do not lose their right to sue for damages sustained within statute of limitations period by failing to sue on earlier incidents in timely manner
C.