With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". At all times relevant to this proceeding, section 31 of the Texas Probate Code allowed for a statutory bill of review in connection with probate proceedings, providing: Any person interested may, by a bill of review filed in the court in which the probate proceedings were had, have any decision, order, or judgment rendered by the court, or by the judge thereof, revised and corrected on showing error therein; but no process or action under such decision, order or judgment shall be stay ended section 31 to displace equitable bills of review in probate proceedings, but to the extent it does not, they argue the statute plainly establishes the outer temporal limits for attacking a probate judgment. Cf. Gramercy Ins. Co. v. State, 834 S.W.2d 379, 381 (Tex. App.— San Antonio 1992, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). B. Applicable Statute of Limitations Whether

A: holding that a statutory right is a creature of the legislature and does not exist where the legislature has not acted
B: holding that the legislature intended to abrogate equitablebillofreview requirements when it enacted the special statutory bill of review in tex code crim proc art 2217
C: holding that when the legislature enacts a statute it is presumed that the legislature is aware of existing statutes
D: holding that the specific terms of a trust may abrogate the statutory duty to diversify
B.