With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and adverse action clearly restricting the plaintiff’s liberty .... ” Velez, 401 F.3d at 87-88 (emphasis added) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “[T]he impact that defamation might have on job prospects, or, for that matter, romantic aspirations, friendships, self-esteem, or any other typical consequence of a bad reputation are not sufficient to meet the ‘plus’ prong of the test.” Ingber v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ., No. 14-CV-3942 (JMF), 2014 WL 6888777, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted). Plaintiffs highly abstract and generalized allegation, without specific evidence of a tangible deprivation, falls short in exactly this manner. See Ooley v. Citrus Heights Police Dep’t, No. 2:12-CV-00095 (JAM), 2013 WL 57018, at *6 (E.D.Cal. Jan. 3, 2013) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 603 Fed.Appx. 628 (9th Cir.2015). The

A: holding that loss of quiet enjoyment is not a sufficient plus
B: holding award that included damages for loss of enjoyment of life not excessive
C: holding that claimants may be entitled to damages for loss of use and enjoyment in addition to returned rents and profits
D: holding that loss of an arm includes loss of the hand
A.