With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by a criminal defendant only after conviction. See Workman v. State, 170 Tex.Crim. 621, 622, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961). There are narrow exceptions to the rule requiring conviction before a criminal defendant may appeal. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App. — Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex.App.— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (per curiam). A defendant may appeal: (1) while on unad-judicated community supervision; (2) the denial of a motion to reduce bond; (3) the denial of a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus alleging double jeopardy; and (4) the denial of habeas corpus relief in extradition cases. Wright, 969 S.W.2d at 589; McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161. But see Ex parte Shumake, 953 S.W.2d 842, 846-47 (Tex.App. — Austin 1997, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). In this case, appellant is attempting to

A: holding that the real id act gave us jurisdiction to review a criminal aliens petition for review of an order of removal raising a question of law
B: holding that we lack jurisdiction to review a denial of adjustment of status as a discretionary matter
C: holding that appeal from denial of rule 60b motion raised for review only the district courts order of denial and not the underlying judgment itself
D: holding no jurisdiction to review order raising amount of bail and questioning jurisdiction to review denial of motion to reduce bond
D.