With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". were free from its control and direction. Id. at 1 30. 110 We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' determination that Diligent failed to prove that the 220 drivers were actually independent contractors under seetion 8-70-115. II. Standard of Review 111 The employer has the burden of proving that the putative employee is an independent contractor under section 8-70-115. Long View Sys. Corp. USA v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 197 P.3d 295, 298 (Colo.App.2008). Whether the employer has met this burden is a question of fact. Id. We will not disturb the ICAO panel's determination as long as the ICAO panel properly applied the law and the findings of fact support its conclusion. § 8-74-107(6)(c) to (d), C.R.S. (2018); Allen Co. v. Indus. Comm'n, 762 P.2d 677, 680 (Colo.1988) (<HOLDING>). However, whether the ICAO panel applied the

A: holding that the icaos decision should not be disturbed if it is supported by substantial evidence
B: holding that if a decision below is correct it will not be disturbed on appeal even though the lower court relied upon wrong reasons
C: holding that substantial evidence supports an adverse credibility finding if it is supported by specific cogent reasons
D: recognizing that the district courts decision to termi nate parental rights will be upheld by this court if it is supported by substantial evidence
A.