With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". independent claims, which were the only matters that remained pending before the court. The order set out a schedule and procedure for discovery, required a conference of counsel, and addressed other administrative matters. On March 18, the City filed a third motion to dismiss on res judicata grounds. [¶ 7] Following a hearing held on April 27, the court granted the City’s second motion to dismiss, sanctioning Baker’s Table for failure to file a motion to specify the future course of proceedings. Over Baker’s Table’s objection, the court on May 3 also granted the City’s first motion to dismiss, based on Baker’s Table’s failure to file a request for trial of the facts. This appeal followed. II. DISCUSSION A. . Rule 80B(d) [¶ 8] The court entered its first orde 72 A.2d 913, 918 (Me.1984) (<HOLDING>). The record may also be supplemented with

A: holding that a complaints bare assertions alone were insufficient for certification
B: holding that a bare allegation of bad faith is insufficient to require an inquiry into the governments decision not to file  5k11 motion
C: holding that a bare conclusory allegation of an intent to discriminate is insufficient specific nonconclusory facts from which such an intent may reasonably be inferred is required
D: holding bare allegation of social friendship insufficient
D.