With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or unwilling to return to his country of origin “because of [past] persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, ... membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42); see also Sako, 434 F.3d at 862. Mbaye fails to demonstrate either past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution and, therefore, her motion to reopen must fail. See Zhang, 543 F.3d at 854 (“When a necessary element of her claim — whether she faced a risk of individual persecution — failed, so did her entire motion.”). “To the extent [that Mbaye’s] underlying asylum claim is based on past persecution, her claim is precluded by the IJ’s previous adverse credibility determination.” Vakeesan, 343 Fed.Appx. at 124; see also Zhang, 543 F.3d at 855 (<HOLDING>); Abeshi, 259 Fed.Appx. at 778 (holding that

A: holding that the bia did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to reopen supported by allegedly unavailable evidence regarding changed country conditions where there had been a previous adverse credibility finding in the underlying asylum hearing
B: holding that the bia did not abuse is discretion in declining to credit unauthenticated documents submitted with a motion to reopen where alien had been found not credible in the underlying proceedings
C: holding that bia abused its discretion in denying motion to reopen
D: holding that the bia did not abuse its discretion in taking into account the ijs and bias prior unrebutted adverse credibility determination in reviewing documentation submitted with a motion to reopen
D.