With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Judge. Felix Moultrie appeals from a final judgment adjudicating him guilty of aggravated battery in which he was sentenced as a prison releasee reoffender to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Out of the five issues raised on appeal, only one merits discussion and requires reversal. Moultrie claims and the State agrees that the trial court erred in imposing discretionary costs without orally announcing same and without making the required statutory finding that he had the ability to pay the additional assessment. See § 939.18, Fla. Stat. (1999); Patterson v. State, 796 So.2d 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Tolbert v. State, 698 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (<HOLDING>). Because these requirements were not followed,

A: holding that a court may sua sponte dismiss pursuant to rule 41b for failure to comply with a court order
B: holding failure to comply with  851b was harmless error in part because defendant did not comply with  851c procedures for challenging prior convictions
C: holding trial court must comply with procedures in imposing discretionary costs pursuant to section 93901
D: holding plaintiffs failure to comply with section 2622 requires dismissal in federal court
C.