With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Referring to the Standardized Civil Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No. 9-03 (2002 ed. rev.), which had been provided to the jurors. 7 . At the outset, we reject Ms. Blackwell’s argument that because this was a complex medical malpractice case with no fewer than four breaches of the applicable standard of care alleged, the jury was obligated to reach unanimity on each theory of breach before determining whether a particular breach proximately caused Ms. Bowman’s death. The trial court correctly noted that, by consenting to a verdict form that simply asked one single question about breach instead of requesting a special verdict form specifically addressing each of the alleged breaches, appellants forfeited this argument. See Burke v. Scaggs, 867 A.2d 213, 221 (D.C.2005) (<HOLDING>); Nimetz v. Cappadona, 596 A.2d 603, 606-08

A: holding that despite a jury verdict against the insured hospital for medical malpractice liability was not beyond dispute
B: holding in a medical malpractice case involving several theories of liability that the appellant by not requesting a special verdict form has forfeited his right to complain on appeal that the jury might not have been unanimous in its views
C: holding that party did not waive right to trial by jury by requesting directed verdict
D: holding that where a jury fails to return unanimous answers to some of the questions on a special verdict form the trial judge can enter judgment on the basis of the unanimous verdicts if they are dispositive of the case
B.