With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". expenses that were incurred by the child from fall 2006 through the child’s 2009 fall semester of college. Specifically, the father argues that the mother’s evidence of the child’s previously incurred educational expenses was hearsay, and that he should not be required to pay those expenses because he had been paying child support at the same time that those expenses were incurred. However, we will not consider these arguments presented by the father because the father has not complied with Rule 28(a)(10), Ala. R.App. P., by failing to include “citations to the cases, statutes, other authorities, and parts of the record relied on.” Rule 28(a)(10). See also State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Motley, 909 So.2d 806, 822 (Ala.2005) (quoting Ex parte Showers, 812 So.2d 277, 281 (Ala.2001)) (<HOLDING>). The father also argues that the mother failed

A: holding that an appellants failure to strictly comply with parap 1925a2 did not warrant an application of the waiver rule as no court order had been violated and there was no prejudice to any party
B: holding that a failure to comply with rule 28a10 provides an appellate court a basis for disregarding the appellants arguments
C: holding that appellate rule 66b does not authorize an interlocutory appeal that fails to comply with appellate rule 14
D: holding that a court may sua sponte dismiss pursuant to rule 41b for failure to comply with a court order
B.