With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (<HOLDING>); Vaughn v. AAA Emp’t, Inc., 511 So.2d 1045,

A: holding that the trial court properly exercised general jurisdiction over corporation that marketed distributed repaired and sold parts in florida and additionally provided continuous charter services in florida
B: holding that defendants bank account and open line of credit in florida utilized to transfer money in international commerce was insufficient to confer jurisdiction under section 481932 florida statutes where defendant operated its business in honduras had no employees or agents in florida and did not advertise or solicit business in florida
C: holding that outofstate defendants who furnished intangibles and services in west virginia and ohio and entered into agreement in which a florida corporation served as financier and supervisor of enterprises business aspects did not submit themselves to florida jurisdiction
D: holding defendant had requisite contacts under section 481932 florida statutes where it solicited consulting and other services from a florida corporation in which a substantial amount of the services sought by defendant were performed in florida
C.