With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". amendment, or upon the commencement of the next 10-year automatic extension period. We conclude that the trial court erred by determining that the amendment took immediate effect. In reviewing the language of restrictive covenants, this Court recognizes that “[b]uilding and use restrictions in residential deeds are favored by public policy.” Rofe v Robinson (On Second Remand), 126 Mich App 151, 157; 336 NW2d 778 (1983). Judicial policy requires that we seek to protect property values as well as “aesthetic characteristics considered to be essential constituents of a family environment.” Webb v Smith (After Second Remand), 224 Mich App 203, 211; 568 NW2d 378 (1997), quoting Rofe, 126 Mich App at 157 (quotation marks and citation omitted). This Court summarized the general rules for co (<HOLDING>). If, however, every then lot owner voted to

A: holding that a second extended term cannot be imposed on an offense occurring before the imposition of the first extended term under njsa 2c445b1
B: holding that an amendment of restrictive covenants passed during the running of an automatic 10year extension period was not effective until the end of the 10year extension period
C: holding that amendments of the restrictive covenants passed during the initial 20year term would not take effect until the beginning of the automatic 10year extension period
D: holding that restrictive covenants were extended for automatic 10year extension when the attempted amendment oc curred two days after the original term expired
D.