With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". much force was applied, it does allege the use of unreasonable force and rough handling. (Doc. # 50, 7, 9). Despite the sparse pleadings, under the circumstances of this case the Court is satisfied that the Plaintiffs had a clearly established right to be free from excessive force and rough handling, which, upon further development of the factual record, may later be proved to have been excessive. The Court now turns to whether the Plaintiffs have alleged specific facts, which if true, would violate this clearly established right. 2. Have the Plaintiffs alleged a constitutional violation? It is not unconstitutional for a law enforcement officer to use a reasonable amount of force to detain individuals during a valid search of a residence. See Summers, 452 U.S. at 704-05, 101 S.Ct. 2587 (<HOLDING>); Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 98-99, 125

A: holding that a warrant to search for contraband founded on probable cause implicitly carries with it the limited authority to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted
B: holding that it is permissible under the fourth amendment to detain occupants of a residence while executing a search warrant of the residence
C: holding that officers may detain the occupants of a house while executing a search warrant
D: holding that officers executing a search warrant for contraband have the authority to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted
D.