With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a station-by-station license copyright license would have boosted competition in one market (the market for subscription television services) by hampering competition in another market (the market for local broadcast advertising). Such a license would have harmed both independent broadcasters and local advertisers. By choosing a market-by-market license, Congress acted to minimize the unintended, disruptive effects of its intervention in the television marketplace. This interest in preserving a level playing field in local broadcast advertising markets seems to us at least as significant as many interests which the Supreme Court has found to be important or substantial. See, e.g., Clark v. Community for Creative Non Violence, 468 U.S. 288, 296, 104 S.Ct. 3065, 82 L.Ed.2d 221 (1984) (<HOLDING>); Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for

A: holding that preventing fraud maintaining ethical standards and privacy were substantial interests
B: recognizing strong public interest in maintaining confidentiality of official records concerning child abuse
C: holding that government had a substantial interest in maintaining parks in washington dc in an attractive and intact condition
D: holding that plaintiffs tennessee voters had a plain direct and adequate interest in maintaining the effectiveness of their votes and therefore had standing to maintain the action
C.