With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 177, 188 (Winter 2008) (“[T]here is not one consistent legitimate special circumstance that warrants release on bail.”). Multiple factors have led to this convoluted “special circumstances” standard. See Kelly, Bail in International Extraditions, supra, at 36-37. First, as discussed above, there is no clear authority on the issue of bail in international extradition proceedings. Second, it is not uncommon for defense attorneys to present a myriad of special circumstances in support of their client’s bail application. See, e.g., Nina Marino & Nicole Eiland, Defending International Extradition, 22 Crim. Just. 4, 7 (Winter 2008) (suggesting that the “best way to secure release pending the extradition proceedings is to throw in the proverbial kitchen sink”); Ramnath, 533 F.Supp.2d at 671 (<HOLDING>). This tactic results in courts considering,

A: recognizing that respondents counsel strains too hard with specious arguments and summarily rejecting these patently gilded points
B: holding failure to file statement of points is no bar to appeal
C: holding courts do not consider points not raised in briefs
D: holding statement of points in notice of appeal sufficient
A.