With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (1983)). 17 . Id. at 256 (quoting Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 442, 104 S.Ct. 3138, 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984)). 18 . See id. at 256 (“If a reasonable person would have thought he was free to leave, the Miranda inquiry is at an end. But if a reasonable person would not have thought himself free to leave, additional analysis is required because ... not every seizure constitutes cus tody for purposes of Miranda. The ultimate inquiiy is[,] was there a formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest.”) (internal punctuation and citations omitted). 19 . Even when the officers told appellant she had committed a crime by destroying Mr. Ward's property, they made it plain that she was not under arrest. 20 . See, e.g. Hughes, 640 F.3d at 435-37 (<HOLDING>); United States v. Titemore, 437 F.3d 251, 260

A: holding that defendant was not in miranda custody during knock and talk interview at his residence
B: holding that defendant was not in custody during search of his residence
C: holding that a defendant who was told several times he was not under arrest and who never asked to leave during an interview with investigators was not in custody
D: holding miranda inapplicable because defendant not in custody
A.