With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 18 . Id.,n 72-79. 19 . Id., ¶¶ 80-87. 20 . Id.,m 88-95.. 21 . Id., ¶¶ 96-104. 22 . Id., ¶¶ 105-115. 23 . Id., ¶¶ 116-126. 24 . Id., ¶¶ 127-136. 25 . Id., ¶¶ 137-143. 26 . Id., ¶¶ 144-153. 27 . Id., ¶¶ 154-170. 28 . Id., «171-177. 29 . Petition, ¶ 7. 30 . Id. 31 . Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Petitioner CarMax’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss ("RJN”), Docket No. 14 (Feb. 25, 2015). 32 . RJN at 1. 33 . MTD Opposition at 7-8. 34 . MTD Reply at 4. 35 . Petition at 1. 36 . Petition, ¶ 3. 37 . Petition, ¶ 3; see also Complaint at 29. 38 . The petition adequately alleges Hernandez's and CarMax's respective citizenship. An individual like Hernandez is a citizen of the state in which he or she is domiciled. See Gilbert v. David, 235 U.S. 561, 569, 35 S.Ct. 164, 59 L.Ed. 360 (1915) (<HOLDING>); Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853,

A: holding that a plaintiff can show that she is qualified by presenting credible evidence that she continued to possess the objective qualifications she held when she was hired
B: holding that the district court did not err in failing to address the defendant personally to determine whether she understood the rights she was waiving by admitting that she violated the conditions of her probation
C: holding that a person is a citizen of the state in which she has her domicile ie a permanent home where she intends to remain or to which she intends to return
D: holding appellant produced no evidence that when she made her complaints to management she ever mentioned that she felt she was being treated unfairly due to her race or sex
C.