With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Government knew that the Contract was in an overrun position, there was no evidence that the Government did not want the prototype CLINs performed. 35. Northrop Grumman, with the Government’s encouragement, continued performance and continued to incur costs in excess of the obligation limitation due to the various constructive changes, extra work, defective specifications, delays, acceleration, and interference. Glinka Deck UH 28, 35. Plaintiff also cites documents showing that the Government was aware, not only of the nature and extent of the work plaintiff performed, but also of funding overruns. In spite of this knowledge, plaintiff hat the Government intended to create an objective expectation of an intent to provide further funding. Cf. American Electronic Labs., 774 F.2d at 1115 (<HOLDING>). Mr. Glinka’s declaration is dispositive

A: holding that government consistently induced plaintiff to continue its performance by making representations that it would fund the overrun
B: holding that the alien was entitled to performance by the government of its promise that the government would not oppose any of his motions for relief from deportation
C: holding that immunity applies to suit for declaratory judgment that plaintiff was entitled to continue paying for mudshell at the price specified in its contract with the government
D: holding that the government can use prearrest silence for impeachment purposes against a defendant because no government action induced the silence
A.