With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Pennington, judge of the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas. 5 . The trial court also denied the District’s motion to sever the partial summary judgment granted by the trial court. Because the trial court denied the severance motion, the court's summary judgment ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 6 . (emphasis added). The fact that the Board approved the permit applications upon the condition that the District’s General Manager confirm each applicant’s installation of a water well flow meter, compliance with the Rules of the Kinney County Groundwater Conservation District, and payment of all fees due and owing to the District does not diminish or affect the definitiveness of the District’s order in this instance. See Tex.-New Mexico Power Co., 806 S.W.2d at 233 (<HOLDING>). 7 . The District argues the cases cited in

A: holding that once district court entered order approving the settlement of class claims it could not alter the class in the absence of egregious error
B: recognizing that conditions placed on the issuance of a permit do not necessarily diminish or eliminate the definitiveness of the order approving the permit
C: holding that issuance of an order to show cause satisfied this requirement
D: recognizing the importance of a determination on the merits with respect to the issuance of a permanent injunction
B.