With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". precisely assert a paramount title to Tracts A and A2. In fact, they conceded Mother held legal title to these tracts. Rather, they asserted they held equitable title to the tracts and sought specific performance as a remedy for Mother’s alleged breach of the contracts to sell the tracts. Further, our appellate courts have traditionally viewed the main purpose of a cause of action seeking specific performance as the pursuit of equitable relief and thus have found such a claim to be equitable in nature. See Ingram v. Kasey’s Assocs., 340 S.C. 98, 105, 531 S.E.2d 287, 290-91 (2000) (applying the equitable standard of review to the findings of fact in a specific performance action); Lowcountry Open Land Trust v. Charleston S. Univ., 376 S.C. 399, 406, 656 S.E.2d 775, 779 (Ct. App. 2008) (<HOLDING>). Based on the foregoing, we view the two

A: holding that an action for specific performance lies in equity
B: holding that an employees action against her employer for negligent supervision lies not in tort but with an action for breach of contract
C: holding  1983 action lies for warrantless arrest without probable cause
D: holding that an action for the negligence of an architect in the performance of professional services is an action for breach of contract
A.