With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". rule. The “unlawful act” course of conduct embodies the “misdemeanor-manslaughter rule” under which a criminal defendant is guilty of a felony for killing a human being while in the commission of a misdemeanor. Wayne R. LaFave & Austin W. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.13(a), at 288 (1986) 83, 784 (1971) (concluding that violations of the motor vehicle code are not necessarily the unlawful act contemplated in misdemeanor-manslaughter, and that to sustain a conviction “it must be established that such violation in itself, or together with the surrounding circumstances, ‘evidence a disregard of human life or an indifference to consequences’ ” (quoting Commonwealth v. Holman, 160 Pa.Super. 211, 50 A.2d 720, 721 (1947))); Holder v. State, 152 Tenn. 390, 277 S.W. 900 (1925) (<HOLDING>); State v. Beayon, 158 Vt. 133, 605 A.2d 527,

A: holding that a minormisdemeanor such as the failure to stop at a stop sign could not be a predicate offence for misdemeanormanslaughter because it did not show the necessary intent or recklessness
B: holding that the misdemeanormanslaughter rule requires a showing of intent or the commission of an act in such a maimer as to make the killing of deceased a natural or probable result of such conduct
C: holding intent to intimidate or threaten may be proved by circumstantial evidence such as ones conduct or statements
D: holding that the only showing of intent required for a vcea claim is the intent to do the act involved
B.