With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and file sharing methods commonly used among child pornographers. Gardner did not challenge Hucka-bee’s credentials or expertise. We hold that the affidavit provided probable cause for issuing the search warrant. See State v. Moore, No. 05-06-01295-CR, 2007 WL 4305374, at *5 (Tex.App.-Dallas Dec. 11, 2007, pet. refd) (not designated for publication) (reversing pretrial order granting motion to suppress because affiant averred that defendant had internet access at his home and using his name, set up a Yahoo account; pornographic images were uploaded to that account from computer located in defendant’s home supported reasonable inference that child pornography would be found at defendant’s residence); see also State v. Cotter, 360 S.W.3d 647, 652-53 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2012, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Conclusion Because the record supports the

A: holding that in a  1983 action issue of probable cause is for the jury
B: holding that the defendant cannot claim a reasonable expectation of privacy in the governments acquisition of his subscriber information including his ip address and name because it had been revealed to a third party internal quotation marks omitted
C: holding probable cause exists based upon information received from a reliable eyewitness
D: holding that information from reliable entity confirming that defendant was the internet subscriber associated with the ip addresses at issue and used screen name involved in crime supported probable cause for warrant
D.