With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". without survey granted); Expoconsul International, Inc., v. A/E Systems, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 1237, 1247 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (same). This result is compelled where Nartron has failed to rebut the proffered evidence, nor provided evidence of its own suggesting that there is a genuine issue of material fact with respect to the issue of genericness. Also, Nartron’s reliance on ST’s failure to provide any dictionary containing a definition for “smart power” is misplaced. Dictionary definitions are merely one source from which genericness may be proven. The law is quite clear that the absence of a composite term from the dictionary does not end the analysis, because numerous terms have been found to be generic despite their absence from the dictionary. See, e.g., Liquid Controls, 802 F.2d at 937 (<HOLDING>); National Conf. of Bar Examiners, 692 F.2d at

A: holding that liquid controls is generic
B: recognizing how generic and lightly invoked is the need for uniformity
C: holding that light beer is generic
D: holding that a database is a generic computer element
A.