With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". determination.” Khalili v. Holder, 557 F.3d 429, 435 (6th Cir.2009). Maldonado-Reyes challenges the denial of his request for a continuance. “We review the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s denial of petitioner’s motion for continuance under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” Ilic-Lee v. Mukasey, 507 F.3d 1044, 1047 (6th Cir.2007). “An abuse of discretion occurs if ‘the denial ... was made without a rational explanation, inexplicably departed from established policies, or rested on an impermissible basis such as invidious discrimination.’ ” Id. (omission in original) (quoting Abu-Khaliel v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 627, 634 (6th Cir.2006)). The IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. “Finding ‘good cause’ is crucial since a continuance, in effe .2008) (<HOLDING>). Maldonado-Reyes additionally argues that the

A: holding that an ij made an explicit credibility when the ij found testimony not credible based on several enumerated inconsistencies
B: holding that the ij did not abuse his discretion in denying request for further continuance where the ij granted previous request
C: holding that criminal aliens argument that the ij abused its discretion by not granting her a continuance does not present a constitutional claim or issue of law that this court has jurisdiction to consider
D: holding that where the ij had previously granted continuance requests this reason alone is a sufficient basis to affirm the ij
D.