With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 4 . Alaska R. Civ. P. 56(c). 5 . See State v. Alaska Civil Liberties Union, 978 P.2d 597, 603 (Alaska 1999), cert. denied, - U.S. --, 120 S.Ct. 1156, 145 LEd.2d 1069 (2000). 6 . See Guin v. Ha, 591 P.2d 1281, 1284 n. 6 (Alaska 1979). 7 . - Bering Strait Sch. Dist. v. RLI Ins. Co., 873 P.2d 1292, 1294 (Alaska 1994). 8 . See id.; State v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London, 755 P.2d 396, 400 (Alaska 1988). 9 . Underwriters at Lloyds, 755 P.2d at 400 (quoting Robert E. Keeton, Basic Text on Insurance Law § 6.3(a), at 351 (1971)). 10 . See, eg., Grace v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 944 P.2d 460, 467 n. 15 (Alaska 1997); U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Colver, 600 P.2d 1, 3 (Alaska 1979). 11 . See Bering Strait, 873 P.2d at 1295. 12 . See id. 13 . Cf. Souza v. Corvick, 441 F.2d 1013, 1020-21 (D.C.Cir.1970) (<HOLDING>). 14 . 4 F.Supp.2d 1288, 1296 (D.N.M.1998). 15

A: holding that damage to realty was not excluded from coverage if such damage resulted from subsidence caused by something other than soil condition despite homeowners experts description of the damage as settling
B: holding that property damage occurred when homeowners noticed damage not when house was improperly constructed
C: holding that termite damage does not fall within the meaning of property damage in the policy because the alleged misrepresentations did not cause the damage the termites did
D: holding that a partys responsibility for damage from any cause included damage cause by the indemnitee
A.