With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 231 F.3d at 1089; Bailey, 227 F.3d at 801. More significantly, unlike an ordinary bank teller, Mr. Anderson had the authority to withdraw funds from TCF accounts in amounts over $1,000 without obtaining a supervisor’s permission. Additionally, as a supervisor, Mr. Anderson had knowledge of a code to access CD accounts (such as the Kern accounts), which ordinary bank tellers did not possess. These attributes of his position gave him substantial discretion and responsibility, allowing him to withdraw improperly large amounts of money from any account in the bank without coming under the scrutiny of other bank employees. As a result, Mr. Anderson’s job properly was considered a position of trust within the meaning of the guideline and our precedent. Cf. Sonsalla, 241 F.3d at 909-10 (<HOLDING>); Hernandez, 231 F.3d at 1091 (holding that

A: holding that the state as well as the defendant has a right to rely on compliance with rule 16
B: holding that the national bank act preempts state regulation of the posting order of debit card transactions as well as any obligation to make specific affirmative disclosures to bank customers
C: holding that defendants position as bank vice president which allowed him knowledge of the banking system and the operations of the bank as well as the ability to oversee commercial and real estate loans and to act as a compliance officer qualified as a position of trust
D: holding that a former bank president who alleged that he was wrongfully discharged as a result of the actions of a state banking official must show that the acts left him unable to pursue any comparable job in the banking industry
C.