With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". absent the [erroneously admitted evidence,] is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the jury would have returned a verdict of guilty?” 461 U.S. at 510-11, 103 S.Ct. 1974. Setting aside the evidence seized during the warrantless search of Harris’s house,'it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the jury would have returned a verdict of guilty — the same verdict it did in fact return. III. Because any error by the trial court in admitting the evidence seized during the warrantless search of Harris’s house was harmless error, we affirm the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment. AFFIRMED. HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur. 1 . Officer Shepard could not recall the names of the other three officers, but she testified that two officers pp.1995)(<HOLDING>); Johnson v. State, 402 So.2d 1111, 1113

A: holding that the police may conduct a warrantless search if they believe that their own lives or the lives of others are at risk
B: holding that a warrantless arrest does not violate the fourth amendment if at the time of the defendants arrest police had probable cause to believe that an offense has been is being or will be committed
C: holding jury is sole judge of witness credibility and may believe some witnesses and refuse to believe others
D: recognizing that for fourth amendment purposes an arrest warrant supported by probable cause carries with it limited authority to enter a dwelling in which a suspect lives when there is reason to believe that the suspect is within
A.