With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". trial court did not err in modifying the arbitration award to include the three entity names all representing the same law firm and entering judgment against B & A as well as B & A LLC. See Cummings v. HCA Health Servs. of Tex., Inc., 799 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no writ) (“We see no difference whether [hospital] is sued ‘as a d/b/a’ and alleged to be the assumed or common name of another corporate entity, or sued alone as the assumed or common name.”) (citing Tex.R. Civ. P. 28 (allowing lawsuits to be brought directly against entity in its assumed name)). We overrule appellants’ second issue. III. Joint and Several Liability Improper In their third issue, appellants complain that the trial court erred in making Broemer jointl -San Antonio 1994, writ denied) (<HOLDING>); Riha v. Smulcer, 843 S.W.2d 289, 294

A: recognizing that a trial court can set aside verdict
B: holding that trial courts order erroneously set aside arbitrators award of attorneys fees because issue had properly been submitted to arbitrator and trial court was  without authority to modify that aspect of the decision
C: holding trial court had no authority to award attorneys fees when arbitrator had stated he would not award attorneys fees
D: holding that court was required to award an attorneys billing rate where defendant had submitted no evidence on fees
B.