With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". T & T Mfg. Co. v. A.T. Cross Co., 587 F.2d 533, 538 (1st Cir.1978)) (“[A]sk[ing] ‘whether there is any significant harm to the public’ before holding that a settlement agreement related to trademarks was enforceable”; VISA Int’l Serv. Assn. v. Bankcard Holders of America, 784 F.2d 1472, 1473 (9th Cir.1986) (“ ‘In general, a party entering into a settlement agreement with respect to a trademark will be held to his contract unless enforcement of the contract would result in injury to the public through confusion.’ ”) (citation omitted). Thus, this court finds M & M Produce unequivocally extends Lear to cases involving intellectual property other than those involving patents and to licenses which include a no-challenge provision. See also G & T Terminal Packaging, 425 F.3d at 717-18 (<HOLDING>) (citing MWS Wire Indus., Inc. v. California

A: holding that m  m produce properly applied the lear balancing test
B: holding that where a party claims a document is privileged and the trial court fails to conduct an in camera review or balancing test the trial court has departed from the essential requirements of the law
C: holding that the proper test for balancing national security interests with a persons due process rights is the mathews balancing test
D: holding admissibility of polygraph evidence should be resolved under fedrevid 403 balancing test but reliability of polygraph test may be included to determine how probative particular polygraph test is
A.