With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". he not be allowed to see his children until a reputable sexual offender treatment therapist recommends such contact recommence. Y. Did the Juvenile Court’s Order that the Father Obtain the Recommendation of a Reputable Sexual Offender Treatment Therapist as a Condition of Contact with His Children Violate the Father’s Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination? In the dispositional order from which this appeal was taken, the juvenile court stated it would “require sexual offender treatment before [Earl II] could re-enter the family home.” The court made the following order concerning Earl II’s contact with his children: [Earl II] shall have no contact whatsoever with any of his children from the date of this order until further court order. The Court will reconsider 16 (1996) (<HOLDING>). We think the case before us is quite similar

A: holding state had violated the defendants fifth amendment rights and consequently was prohibited from using any of the information revealed during courtordered treatment program in later separate criminal prosecution
B: holding that rights in a government benefits program were not vested property for purposes of the takings clause of the fifth amendment
C: holding that courtordered examinations of those defendants who plead insanity and the admission of this examination is not an infringement of the defendants fifth amendment rights
D: holding defendants fifth amendment rights had been violated when his probation was revoked based on his failure to complete a sexual treatment program that required incriminating admissions
A.