With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". rely on the court’s second reason for rejecting the post-litigation license as a defense: that at the time Warner Bros, took the pictures and made pictorial reproductions, it did not have a license to do so, and therefore any infringing activity by Warner Bros, could not be later validated by the grant of a license. Id. Here, the Court has found that the defendant already had a valid, oral license from the same co-owners prior to their issuance of any retroactive license. The written license agreements only serve to memorialize terms already agreed upon earlier and do not act as a contrivance to avoid copyright infringement liability. Leicester, therefore, is clearly distinguishable. See Great Southern Homes, Inc. v. Johnson & Thompson Realtors, 797 F.Supp. 609, 612 (M.D.Tenn.1992) (<HOLDING>). The plaintiffs also argue that the written

A: holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer
B: holding that the verification of mishlers medical license was part of the protected property interest in the license and reversing the district courts dismissal of his complaint
C: holding governments repudiation of license gave patentee right to terminate license
D: recognizing validity of retroactive license that memorialized grant of oral license
D.