With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Ryan Lockwood’s instruction to Nicholson to “hold up” prior to Nicholson’s flight did not constitute a seizure. The majority further recognizes that the State does not dispute that Nicholson was seized pursuant to Tennessee constitutional standards when the officers pursued him yelling, “Stop, police.” Accordingly, the totality of the events and circumstances leading up to the officers’ pursuit of Nicholson and the directive, “Stop, police,” may be considered in determining whether reasonable suspicion existed. Detective Lockwood saw Nicholson in an area in which Detective Lockwood and other detectives in the intelligence division were conducting a previously planned investigation of gang activity. See Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124, 120 S.Ct. 673, 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000) (<HOLDING>); State v. Lawson, 929 S.W.2d 406, 408

A: holding that the availability of the icrp is but one factor to be considered in determining undue hardship but it is not determinative
B: holding that the areas propensity toward criminal activity is one factor to be considered in determining the existence of reasonable suspicion
C: holding that passenger conduct can be a factor supporting reasonable suspicion
D: holding that the hgn test may be considered as a factor in determining probable cause
B.