With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". doctrine to other situations. See, e.g., State v. Guillen, 223 Ariz. 314, 317 ¶ 14, 223 P.3d 658, 661 (2010) (applying attenuation doctrine to consent search following allegedly illegal seax’ch); State v. Blackmore, 186 Ariz. 630, 634-35, 925 P.2d 1347, 1351-52 (1996) (upholding search following allegedly illegal arrest); State v. Miller, 186 Ariz. 314, 320-21, 921 P.2d 1151, 1157-58 (1996) (upholding admission of statements made after illegal arrest). ¶ 10 The court of appeals correctly determined that the first Brown factor favored suppression. The officer even reasonable suspicion, by discovering a valid warrant, gains probable cause not just to detain, but to arrest. Cf Whiteley v. Warden, Wyo. State Penitentiary, 401 U.S. 560, 568-69, 91 S.Ct. 1031, 28 L.Ed.2d 306 (1971) (<HOLDING>). If the warrant is valid, the arrest is valid

A: holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same
B: holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment
C: holding under new york law that a grand jury indictment does not create a presumption of probable cause for false arrest claims
D: holding invalid warrant did not create probable cause for arrest
D.