With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court’s decision granting a request for injunctive relief in an action claiming violation of the Eighth Amendment). Although the decisions plaintiff relies on contain broad language which “seem to apply a blanket rule regarding irreparable harm where substantive constitutional rights are concerned, other courts have found that the mere allegation of a constitutional infringement in and of itself does not constitute irreparable harm. Rather district courts must consider the nature of the constitutional injury before making such a conclusion.” Pinckney v. Board of Education of the Westbury Union Free School Dist., 920 F.Supp. 393, 400 (E.D.N.Y.1996) (citing cases). See also Hohe v. Casey, 868 F.2d 69, 72-73 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 848, 110 S.Ct. 144, 107 L.Ed.2d 102 (1989) (<HOLDING>); New Alliance Party v. Dinkins, 743 F.Supp.

A: holding that a movant for a preliminary injunction must first demonstrate that it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of the requested relief
B: holding that even a temporary deprivation of first amendment rights constitutes irreparable harm
C: recognizing that not all constitutional harms are synonymous with irreparable harm and that mere assertion of a first amendment right does not automatically require a finding of irreparable harm rather the movant must show a chilling effect on protected activity
D: holding that the threat of irreparable harm must be immediate
C.