With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a Georgia citizen and resident who has been cited for driving without a valid license to avoid guilt by obtaining a Georgia driver’s license after being cited but prior to the trial of the case — something that Appellant cannot do because he is admittedly an illegal immigrant and thus cannot obtain even a temporary Georgia driver’s license. Appellant then argues that this “retroactive amnesty” provision constitutes an irrevocable grant of special privileges or immunities and makes OCGA § 40-5-20 (a) a retroactive or ex post facto law. The State responds that Appellant has misconstrued the statute, noting that the Court of Appeals has previously rejected the interpretation of OCGA § 40-5-20 (a) that Appellant advances. See Colotl v. State, 313 Ga. App. 42, 44 (720 SE2d 210) (2011) (<HOLDING>). We agree with the State. OCGA § 40-5-20 (a)

A: holding that officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct a vehicle stop where official license and registration records reflected that the vehicle was registered to a driver with a revoked license
B: holding warrantless search of vehicle was improper where car was not stopped on a highway but was parked at a residence with no occupants inside or near the vehicle and capable of being driven away by the turn of an ignition key
C: holding that ocga  40520 as safeharbor provision requires a defendant to produce a drivers license that was valid at the time the vehicle was being driven
D: holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer
C.