With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". various members of the House committee apparently believed that, if a ten-year period of repose were passed, the period to bring an action would be extended to as much as twelve years for defects existing at the time of the first consumer purchase if the general two-year tort statute of limitations were added. Id. at 8-10. The committee sought to limit the exposure of manufacturers, distributors, sellers and lessors to a product liability civil action to a maximum of ten years for such defects by limiting such a cause of action to injuries occurring within eight years of the first purchase for use or consumption and by giving the plaintiff two years to bring such an action after the date of the injury. Id.; see also Baird v. Electro Mart, 47 Or App 565, 569-70, 615 P2d 335 (1980) (<HOLDING>). In sum, the assumption throughout legislative

A: recognizing the conflict
B: recognizing conflict between circuits
C: recognizing conflict between legislative intent and language of ors 309051 and 2
D: recognizing conflict
C.