With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". falls beyond the scope of the policy problem that § 7434 was designed to address. Moreover, this narrow view of the scope of actionable frauds under § 7434(a) accords with Congress’s express desire “not., .to open the door to unwarranted or frivolous actions or abusive litigation practices,” such as “an unfounded or frivolous action... by a current..-employee of an employer who is not pleased with one or more items that his or her current or former employer has included on the employee’s Form W-2.” House Report at 35. Thus, to the extent any inference is warranted from the legislative history and purpose of § 7434, that inference supports the conclusion that “with respect to... ” limits the types of actionable fraud, a conclusion consistent with the co 7, 442 (4th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). To read § 7434(a) as creating a private cause

A: holding the flsa does not provide the exclusive remedy for violations of its mandates
B: holding that 42 usc  1983 does not provide a remedy for flsa violations
C: holding that person in 42 usc  1983 does not include states
D: holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc  1983
B.