With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Under the circumstances of this case, we review the decision of the IJ as supplemented by the BIA. See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). The applicable standards of review are well-established. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); Yanqin Weng v. Holder, 562 F.3d 510, 513 (2d Cir.2009). The agency properly found that petitioners failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution, as required for a grant of asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42). The IJ provided a reasoned and detailed analysis of the record and determined that, while the evidence indicated that ethnic Albanians experience “discrimination and harassment” in Macedonia, the record did not support a finding that they would face persecution. See Ivanishvili v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 433 F.3d 332, 341 (2d Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>); see also Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233, 1240 (3d

A: holding that harm must be sufficiently severe and rise above mere harassment
B: holding that harm must be sufficiently severe rising above mere harassment to constitute persecution
C: holding that to constitute persecution the harm must be sufficiently severe rising above mere harassment
D: holding that to constitute persecution the harm must rise above mere harassment
A.