With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. Gerald David Davage, a Maryland inmate, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this court vacate orders entered by the district court denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion and dismissing his independent action to set aside the § 2255 judgment on the ground that the district court judge was biased against him. Davage also asks that the district court judge recuse himself from any of Davage’s future actions. Because Davage appears dissatisfied merely with the judge’s rulings in his cases and has not established any extrajudicial bias, recusal is not warranted. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). Finally, we decline to vacate the judge’s

A: holding a negligence action arising out of an allterrain vehicle accident was a personal action
B: holding that no waiver of immunity exists for damages arising out of alleged educational malpractice claim against a school board
C: holding that an arising out of exclusion applies to claims flowing from or growing out of the excluded activity
D: holding that nature of alleged bias must be personal and not arising out of litigation
D.