With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 328 (1994); Jones v. Roadway Express, Inc., 931 F.2d 1086, 1092 (5th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). Even within this district, there is a split

A: holding that retaliation claim did not arise under states workers compensation laws
B: holding that  255111 claim does not arise under alabamas workers compensation laws
C: holding the retaliation claim did arise under states workers compensation laws
D: holding that texas cause of action for retaliation does arise under its workers compensation laws
D.