With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in part; dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, the parties appeal from the district court’s order affirming in part and reversing in part the bankruptcy courts’ orders finding that a portion of GMAC’s claims in the underlying bankruptcy proceedings are unsecured. In light of our decision in In re Price, 562 F.3d 618 (4th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>). Because the parties have settled the

A: holding bifurcation and cramdown are unavailable because negative equity is part of purchase money security interest
B: holding debtors negative equity in a tradein vehicle included in amount financed created a purchase money obligation within the meaning of 11 usc  1325a 2006 we summarily affirm the portion of the district courts order at issue in no 081850
C: holding that  1325a is mandatory and that the general powers of the court codified in 11 usc  105a do not permit a court to confirm a plan that does not satisfy  1325a
D: holding that there was no presumption of a gift where the wifes money was used to make the purchase but title was placed in the name of the husband and finding the facts sufficient to establish a purchase money resulting trust in favor of the wife
B.