With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". See Cleavinger v. Sax-ner, 474 U.S. 193, 200, 106 S.Ct. 496, 88 L.Ed.2d 507 (1985) (observing that absolute immunity applies to administrative law judges and “certain others who perform functions closely associated with the judicial process”); Butz v. Econo-mou, 438 U.S. 478, 513, 98 S.Ct. 2894, 57 L.Ed.2d 895 (1978). (c) Statute of Limitations We next address Ms. Lewis’s argument that the district court incorrectly applied the statute of limitations to her claim against Kimberly Martinez. The district court held that the three-year statute of limitations had run before Ms. Lewis filed her complaint on November 29, 2010, because she alleged that Ms. Martinez’s actionable conduct occurred on November 28, 2007. R. at 4. See Mondragon v. Thompson, 519 F.3d 1078, 1082 (10th Cir. 2008) (<HOLDING>). The deadline fell on a Sunday, however, so

A: holding that new york statute of limitations for  1983 actions was three years
B: holding that a complaint filed within three years of an accident complied with the michigan court rules and was not barred by the statute of limitations even though service was made more than three years after the accident
C: holding new mexico statute of limitations for filing a  1983 action is three years
D: holding that new yorks threeyear residual statute of limitations for personal injury claims not embraced by specific statutes rather than oneyear statute of limitations for intentional torts governed  1983 action
C.