With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". appeKant’s objections when Cook explained that the taxes, “1040” and “941,” reflected on the exhibits were personal income tax and an employment tax (social security) withholding. Cook also testified as to when the taxes accrued and that appeKant had paid $10,289.51, $13,551.60 and $14,-411.81 to satisfy income tax Kens and $60,-981.06 for the release of the employment tax, aK of which the certificates reflected. In his point of error, appeKant urges that the trial court erred in overruling an objection “concerning the reasons and detaüs” as to his tax debt. He has not pointed out where this specific objection was made if independent of his “prejudicial” and relevancy objections. We have found no such specific objection. See Thomas v. State, 723 S.W.2d 696, 700 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (<HOLDING>). AppeKant expressly bases his argument on

A: holding that the complaint on appeal must comport with the trial objection
B: holding that appellant did not preserve his complaint for review because the grounds raised on appeal did not comport with those urged to the trial court as justifying suppression
C: holding that defendant failed to preserve for appellate review complaint that prosecutors use of postarrest silence against defendant violated the texas constitution because complaint did not comport with defendants trial court objection based solely on the federal constitution
D: holding that complaint on appeal must be the same as that presented in the trial court
A.