With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". failure to make a showing that is “sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial,” will mandate the entry of summary judgment. Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548. The non-moving party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleadings, but the response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in Rule 56, must set forth specific facts which demonstrate that there is a genuine issue for trial. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). The rule requires the non-moving party to introduce evidence of evidentiary quality” demonstrating the existence of a material fact. Bailey v. Floyd County Bd. of Educ., 106 F.3d 135, 145 (6th Cir.1997); see Anderson, 477 U.S. at 252, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (<HOLDING>). III. ANALYSIS A. Plaintiffs State Claim Under

A: holding that a trial court may enter summary judgment for a nonmoving party under appropriate circumstances
B: holding that grant of summary judgment is appropriate where the nonmoving party adduces nothing more than speculation to support its claims
C: recognizing that a noevidence summary judgment is improper if the nonmovant brings forth more than a scintilla of evidence
D: holding that the nonmoving party must produce more than a scintilla of evidence to survive summary judgment
D.