With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". supervision of that staff member. 2. Smudging ceremony Hyde argues that even if the prohibition of smudging advances a compelling state interest, a complete ban on the practice is not the least restrictive means of advancing that interest. In a 1998 grievance, Hyde explained that smudging “is the act of praying. I can not pray without smudging. Many people pray differently....” Inmate Charles Doan, an adherent to Native American religion, testified at the hearing on Hyde’s habeas corpus petition that ninety-eight percent of the time prayer is effectuated by smudging and that group prayer is a general mandate of Native American religion. In other words, prayers without smudging are “technically possible but effectively miserable.” See Whitney v. Brown, 882 F.2d 1068, 1074 (6th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). In Sample, a federal district court observed

A: holding ban violated the sherman act
B: holding unconstitutional a ban on the passover seder celebration because an individuals solo seder is a very miserable seder
C: holding that an ordinance exempting certain signs from a general sign ban was an unconstitutional contentbased restriction on speech
D: holding ban on newsracks to be contentbased because determining whether a newsrack fell within ban required reference to a publications content
B.