With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". our review of the summary-judgment evidence. See Science Spectrum, Inc., 941 S.W.2d at 911. These issues are encompassed by our disposition of the three specific issues that we address below, all of which Orion has supported with argument and authorities, as required by rule 38.1(h). See Tex.R.App. P. 38.1(h) (requiring that appellant’s brief contain arguments to support contentions). Because Orion has not supported its first and fifth issues with additional arguments that are independent of and distinct from its second, third, and fourth issues, we deem the first and fifth issues addressed by and disposed of by our analysis of Orion’s second, third, and fourth issues. See id,.; Henriquez v. Cemex Mgmt., Inc., 177 S.W.3d 241, 255 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). Breach of Contract As part of its fourth

A: holding that summary judgment must be affirmed where multiple grounds are asserted and the appellant does not attack all grounds on appeal
B: holding summary judgment must be upheld if it is proper on any grounds
C: holding broad malooly  point sufficient to support contention challenging all possible grounds on which summary judgment rendered if supported by argument distinguishing malooly bros inc 461 sw2d at 121
D: holding this court may affirm on any grounds supported by the record even if different from the district courts grounds
C.