With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to be several agreements and hence several conspiracies because it envisages the violation of several statutes rather than one.”). Likewise, Rodriguez cannot be convicted for both felony-murder and first-degree murder after deliberation for the murder of a single victim. See People v. Glover, 893 P.2d 1311, 1314 (Colo.1995); People v. Lowe, 660 P.2d 1261, 1269-71 (Colo.1983); see also infra part XV. Throughout his brief, and particularly in Issue 13, Rodriguez argues that the vacation of the duplicative convictions mandates vacation of his death sentence because “[t]he death verdict is tainted by the consideration of illegal convictions and is itself illegal and unreliable.” Rodriguez’ Opening Brief at 96; see Johnson v. Mississippi, 486 U.S. 578, 108 S.Ct. 1981, 100 L.Ed.2d 575 (1988) (<HOLDING>). As stated in part I of this opinion, the

A: holding that denial of outofcell exercise for an extended period violates the eighth amendment
B: holding that execution of a defendant who commits a capital crime while under the age of eighteen is prohibited by the eighth amendment
C: holding that a conviction even when later reversed creates a rebuttable presumption of probable cause
D: holding that a capital sentencer violates the eighth amendment by considering a conviction which is later reversed as unconstitutional
D.