With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Illinois law, that without evidence of an injury, the question of voluntariness boiled down to a head-to-head credibility contest between Mr. Hinton and the State’s witnesses, and that the new evidence would be inadmissible because Mr. Hinton had no evidence of a physical injury. R. at C-426. I cannot review questions of Illinois law here. Robertson v. Hanks, 140 F.3d 707, 712 (7th Cir.1998). 10 . The Seventh Circuit has expressed doubt about, but has not resolved, whether the Brecht standard survived the passage of the AEDPA in 1996, or whether a stricter standard applies post-AEDPA. See Denny v. Gudmanson, 252 F.3d 896, 905 n. 4 (7th Cir.2001); see also Whitehead v. Cowan, 263 ixon’s testimony should be excluded on that basis, so he has waived any such argument here. See id. at 528 (<HOLDING>) 12 . The spelling also appears as "Randall” in

A: holding that the burden is on the defendant when the validity of the warrant is challenged
B: holding that  direct evidence is evidence showing a specific link between the alleged discriminatory animus and the challenged decision sufficient to support a finding by a reasonable fact finder that an illegitimate criterion actually motivated the adverse employment action 
C: holding that defendant has initial burden to establish link between fourth amendment violation and challenged evidence
D: holding that for an initial civil commitment the state has the burden of proof
C.