With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Walfoort Deck, Ex. 8.) 6 . Bacchus retired from Amtrak in October 2001. (See Ford Deck, Ex. 13 at 5.) 7 . Bacchus testified in her August 2002 deposition that seeking Hall's approval was a "formality” and that the verbal notification to Hall was to merely inform her that she was about to fill the NEC Manager position. (See Walfoort Decl., Ex. 16 at 71-73.) 8 . Ramirez testified that assuming there were five candidates at the time he ranked the candidates, he “probably” would have ranked plaintiff fourth. (See Ford Deck, Ex. 17 at 118.) 9 . Bacchus testified that she did not discuss and assess with Ramirez the candidates for the NEC Manager position, and a select tein, Shapiro, Morin & Oshinsky, 59 F.Supp.2d 27, 33 (D.D.C.1999); Weaver v. Gross, 605 F.Supp. 210, 212-213 (D.D.C.1985) (<HOLDING>). Contra Hunter v. Ark Rests. Corp., 3

A: holding that a superior can be held liable in his individual capacity if he participated in the deprivation of a plaintiffs constitutional rights
B: holding that individuals can be held liable under  1981 only when they have been personally involved or directly participated in the discrimination
C: holding that employer may be held liable under  1981 for discrimination by supervisory employee
D: holding that the individual defendant does not have to be in privity of contract with the plaintiff to be held liable under  1981
B.