With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v. Brown, 526 N.E.2d 719, 730 (Ind.Ct.App.1988) (quoting Deckard v. Adams, 246 Ind. 123, 127, 203 N.E.2d 303, 306 (1965)). Therefore, the fact that the instruction at issue herein contained an accurate statement of the law as well as an inaccurate one does not mean that Carter was not prejudiced as a result of the inaccuracy. Next, the State argues that because both parties argued to the jury in their closing arguments that the State was required to prove an intent to kill to convict Carter of attempted murder, Carter was not prejudiced as a result of the erroneous jury instruction. We cannot agree. Jurors are presumed to follow jury instructions but are not presumed to follow the law as recited by counsel during closing argument. See Chandler v. State, 581 N.E.2d 1233, 1237 (Ind.1991) (<HOLDING>); Hudgins v. State, 451 N.E.2d 1087, 1091

A: recognizing that jurors are presumed to follow instructions
B: holding that a jury is presumed to follow the trial courts instructions
C: holding that a jury is presumed to follow a judges instructions
D: holding that it is presumed that the jury obeyed the trial courts instructions
D.