With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to find that it was being utilized as a commercial establishment related to the distribution of powdered and crack cocaine. Consequently, like the defendant in Talley, Thornton did not have a legitimate or reasonable expectation of privacy in 2316 Eastview Avenue. Moreover, in the absence of evidence that Thornton was inside the house at 2316 Eastview Avenue with the permission of the person having authority over it, this Court must conclude that he was a trespasser. The Sixth Circuit has held that trespassers do not have a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place on which they are trespassing. United States v. Hunyady, 409 F.3d 297 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1067, 126 S.Ct. 810, 163 L.Ed.2d 637 (2005). See also, United States v. McRae, 156 F.3d 708; 711 (6th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). However, even if the evidence had established

A: holding that defendant staying in abandoned house had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the house despite having a key to the house and the ability to let people in and out of it
B: holding that rooming house residents had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the front hallway of the house they shared which was not obviously a rooming house open to the general public
C: holding that a defendant who had been living in a vacant house for approximately one week failed to demonstrate that he had a legitimate ex pectation of privacy
D: holding that the defendant failed to demonstrate legitimate expectation of privacy where he could not show that he had the owners permission to use the car or demonstrate prior use or control of the car
C.