With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Hills Club Apartments, 68 So.3d 954, 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Paddock v. Chacko, 522 So.2d 410, 416 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). One can “assume” such a duty by takin lity alone. Aguila, 878 So.2d at 396. A duty requires one to be in a position to “control the risk.” Id, Thus, in cases of psychiatric facilities, they are liable for a patient’s self-harm because they are “in a position to exercise measures to prevent the suicidal patients from inflicting injuries on themselves.” See Paddock, 522 So.2d at 416. But where a patient commits suicide outside of a facility’s “range of observation and control,” a duty is not present. See Tuten, 84 So.3d at 1068. See also Peklun v. Tierra Del Mar Condo. Ass’n, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 226, 119 F.Supp.3d 1361, 2015 WL 4638602 (g.D.Fla. Aug. 4, 2015) (<HOLDING>). In the instant case, Regions did not assume a

A: holding that it was unreasonable to believe that womans boyfriend had authority to consent to the search of her purse even though he had authority to consent to the search of the car in which it was kept
B: holding a condominium association had no duty to a woman who had committed suicide after the association removed the womans dog because while the association knew the dog was essential to the womans will to live the association had no authority to prevent the womans suicide
C: holding that regulatory enforcement by a highschool athletic association was state action for the purposes of the fourteenth amendment due to the pervasive entwinement between the athletic association and public schools and officials
D: holding that a nocontact order did not violate the right to freedom of association
B.