With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Saidie May ... at some point in time” before its alleged theft. See Opp. to the BMA’s Mot. for Partial Summ. J. (“Opp.”) 28. Fuqua ignores the many other records — such as the board meeting minutes, financial ledger, and especially the police report — that prove the Painting was in BMA’s possession until it was stolen. Fuqua also speculates that Saidie May might never have had actual ownership of the Painting, insinuating that she loaned her husband’s property without his permission. Id. This argument is not consistent with any evidence in the record and therefore comes up short because summary judgment cannot be defeated by speculation alone. Fuqua ultimately fails to offer a scintilla of evidence that the Painting was not stolen from BMA. See Celotex, 477 U.S. at 324, 106 S.Ct. 2548 (<HOLDING>). She has not provided a compelling factual

A: holding that the nonmoving party must go beyond the pleadings to show that there is a genuine issue for trial
B: holding that an adverse party must state specific facts showing there is a genuine issue of fact for trial
C: holding that the moving party has tjhe burden of showing no genuine issue of material fact exists
D: holding due to the moving partys failure to meet its initial burden the onus never passed to the nonmoving party to set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial  citation omitted
B.