With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". BP paid Solis an additional $450 per acre. The Zaffirini Lessors admit that BP paid them $1,750 per acre, but argue that only $1,300 per acre was bonus and the remaining $450 per acre was a separate consent-to-assignment fee not included in bonus. However, we have rejected the Zaffirini Lessors’ interpretation of the Zaffirini lease. The correct interpretation required BP to pay the Zaffirini Lessors $1,750 per acre as bonus. See Heritage Res., Inc. v. NationsBank, 939 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tex.1996); Coker v. Coker, 650 S.W.2d 391, 393 (Tex.1983). Under the proper interpretation of the lease, the evidence establishes conclusively that BP did not breach the lease agreement by refusing to pay Lessors an additional $450 per acre. See City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 810 (Tex.2005) (<HOLDING>) (quoting Robert W. Calvert, “No Evidence” &

A: holding that the court had the discretion to grant the summary judgment motion based on the fact that it was unopposed by plaintiff during the time allowed by the rules of civil procedure
B: recognizing the court must grant a noevidence motion if the evidence establishes conclusively the opposite of the vital fact
C: holding that we must sustain legal sufficiency or noevidence challenge if record shows that evidence conclusively establishes opposite of vital fact and matter is established as matter of law if reasonable people could not differ as to conclusion to be drawn from evidence
D: holding that the decision of the appellate court establishes the law of the case and it must be followed by the trial court on remand
B.