With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". applicable to petitions for third-party visitation to give special weight to a parent's decision concerning visitation, in accordance with Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 120 S.Ct. 2054, 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000). Specifically, this court concluded that in considering a stepparent's request for visitation, the trial court must also consider the presumption that a fit parent acts in his or her child's best interests, the special weight afforded a fit parent's decision to deny visitation, and whether the parent has denied or simply limited visitation. Schaffer v. Schaffer, 884 N.E.2d 423. This court's early third-party visitation cases did not hold, however, that standing to seek such visitation was limited to stepparents. See, e.g., Krieg v. Glassburn, 419 N.E.2d 1015 (Ind.Ct.App.1981) (<HOLDING>), superseded by statute as recognized in In re

A: holding that the governments cooperation with a thirdparty is not sufficient to establish a thirdparty beneficiary relationship
B: holding that the thirdparty beneficiary theory did not apply
C: holding that a plaintiff who had asserted no claim against a thirdparty defendant lacked standing to complain of the courts action with regard to the thirdparty defendant
D: holding prior to the passage of the grandparent visitation act that grandparents may be granted thirdparty visitation
D.