With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". § 991, at 146 (1956). Similarly, another treatise explains: “The personal representative may require a receipt or a release as a condition precedent to payment of a legacy or distributive share, which receipt or release discharges the representative from further liability, in the absence of impeaching circumstances such as fraud or mistake.” 34 C.J.S. Executors and Administrators § 656. Courts in other jurisdictions similarly have found that a personal representative is entitled to a release prior to making a distribution. See Ford v. Wilson, 85 A. 1073, 1077 (Del.Ch. 1913) (personal representative had a right to require a release from a distributee prior to making the final settlement of an estate); Sterrett v. Nat’l Safe Deposit, Savings & Trust Co., 10 App.D.C. 131, 139 (1897) (<HOLDING>); First Midwest Bank v. Dempsey, 157 Ill.App.3d

A: holding that payment made in reasonable belief that it was required by an insurance contract was involuntary
B: recognizing that the administrator was amply protected if it made a distribution but nonetheless was entitled to exact releases upon payment of distributions
C: recognizing that an employer had a dual role as administrator of plan and as employer and only the role of administrator was held to a fiduciary standard
D: holding that even if a thirdparty administrator is not a fiduciary under erisa such an administrator still has standing  pursuant to   1331
B.