With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 709 F.3d at 644 (exhaustion requirements and filing deadlines); Brentwood at Hobart v. NLRB, 675 F.3d 999, 1003 (6th Cir.2012) (geographic limitations). Of these, § 1421(c)’s administrative-hearing requirement is best described as an administrative-exhaustion requirement, because the statutory text indicates that an applicant for naturalization who wishes to seek judicial review of the denial of the application may do so only after an administrative hearing before USCIS. The Supreme Court has treated claim-processing rules as nonjurisdictional in all but the most exceptional of instances. See, e.g., Auburn Reg’l, 133 S.Ct. at 824-25 (concluding that a 180-day time limit for filing a request for hearing before an administrative body was not jurisdictional); Henderson, 131 S.Ct. at 1205 (<HOLDING>); see also Reed Elsevier, 559 U.S. at 166, 130

A: holding that a 120day filing deadline for seeking review by the us court of appeals for veterans claims was a claimprocessing rule that lacked jurisdictional attributes
B: holding that the 180day filing deadline is jurisdictional and mandatory
C: holding that time limit for filing petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional
D: holding filing of motion for reconsideration does not toll the 30day deadline for filing petition for review
A.