With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". code, Appellants here “do[ ] not seek an advisory opinion that [their] proposed actions would not be criminal.” Total Vending Svc., 153 Ga. App. at 111. Instead, Appellants seek a determination of whether licensed individuals may carry a weapon on the grounds of the Garden in accordance with OCGA § 16-11-127 (c). See Total Vending, 153 Ga. App. at 111. Further, Appellants’ requested relief is not premised on mere speculation that the Garden will enforce its weapons ban; Evans, who holds a membership with the Garden, had already been asked to leave the premises of the Garden and was escorted from the property by law enforcement. Importantly, however, there is no allegation here that criminal conduct has been accomplished. See Osborne v. State, 290 Ga. App. 188 (665 SE2d 1) (2008) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, Appellants’ request for

A: recognizing that an essential element of criminal trespass is a showing that entry onto the premises had previously been expressly forbidden
B: holding dollar amount is not an essential element
C: holding that the nonmovant must make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that partys case
D: holding that damage to the property of another is an essential element of the offense of criminal mischief
A.