With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the language of the superceding indictment compels the conclusion that either Count 1 or Count 6 was premised, in whole or in part, on the facts or circumstances giving rise to the felon-in-possession charge. The question remains, however, whether the government violated the plea agreement when it introduced evidence at trial that Garton was carrying firearms when he was pulled over in Rawlins. Both Officer Ford and Officer Palmer testified about the Rawlins traffic stop, and the firearms themselves were introduced into evidence. A review of the rec ord reveals this evidence was offered to prove that Garton engaged in drug trafficking activities and that he carried a firearm during and in relation to those activities. See United States v. Martinez, 938 F.2d 1078, 1083 (10th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). Instruction 30 related to Count 1 and stated,

A: holding prior acts of illegal drug distribution admissible to show modus operandi knowledge and absence of mistake
B: holding firearms large sums of cash  and uncharged quantities of illegal drugs are admissible to show a defendant is involved in the distribution of illegal drugs
C: holding the large quantity of drugs sufficient evidence of intent to distribute
D: holding that uncharged amounts of drugs may be included as relevant conduct even if the defendant never actually possessed or distributed the drugs
B.