With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". commerce.” Lopez, 514 U.S. at 558-59, 115 S.Ct. 1624. In Lopez, reiterated in Morrison, the Court outlined four considerations in determining whether purely intrastate activity substantially affects interstate commerce: (1) the commercial or economic nature of the intrastate activity; (2) the presence of a jurisdictional element in the statute; (3) the existence of congressional findings or legislative history demonstrating a link between the regulated activity and interstate commerce; and (4) how attenuated is the link between the intrastate activity and its effect on interstate commerce. See Morrison, 529 U.S. at 609-12, 120 S.Ct. 1740 (2000). In certain instances, an intrastate activity alone may substantially affect interstate commerce. See Jo , 57 S.Ct. 615); Ho, 311 F.3d at 602 (<HOLDING>); but see Rancho Viejo, LLC v. Norton, 323 F.3d

A: holding that the owners at the time the land was seized are owed compensation rather than the subsequent purchasers
B: holding that instructions allowing a jury to find an enterprise from evidence of its activity as opposed to its structure properly conveyed the holding in turkette that proof of a pattern of racketeering activity may be sufficient in a particular case to permit a jury to infer the existence of an associationinfact enterprise
C: recognizing that the regulated activity at issue was asbestos removal rather than the plaintiffs commercial enterprise
D: holding that the forceable stop at issue was an investigatory stop rather than an arrest
C.