With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the decision in Zive is not to require that every plaintiff be afforded a jury trial. Rather, the focus of the inquiry, presuming that the employer offers a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action, moves to the pretext analysis. Id. at 455, 867 A.2d 1133. In that regard, as the Court reminded us: [I]f the employer proffers a non-discriminatory reason, plaintiff does not qualify for a jury trial unless he or she can “point to some evidence, direct or circumstantial, from which a factfinder could reasonably either (1) disbelieve the employer’s a er. 24, 40, 744 A.2d 670 (App.Div.2000)(affirming summary judgment in spite of erroneous reasoning of motion judge); GNOC, Corp. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 328 N.J.Super. 467, 474, 746 A.2d 466 (App.Div.2000)(<HOLDING>), aff'd, 167 N.J. 62, 768 A.2d 1051 (2001). We

A: holding that even when based on erroneous reasoning a conclusion or decision of a trial court will generally be affirmed if the evidence or an alternative theory supports it
B: holding that the judge did not abuse his discretion but applied an incorrect standard
C: holding that an order will be affirmed when correct even if the reasons given by the trial judge were incorrect
D: holding that the decision of the bia will not be affirmed by this court unless the reasons for such a finding are made clear
C.