With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 60 (quoting Linyear ); see also Hullett, 40 M.J. at 191 (indicating the French test is the test); but see F.C.C. v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. at 739-41 & n. 14, 98 S.Ct. at 3035-36 & n. 14 (1978) (defining "indecent” as “nonconformance with excepted standards of morality”). French and other cases have also equated “indecent" with "obscene.” See Moore, 38 M.J. at 492; French, 31 M.J. at 59; United States v. Hudson, 39 M.J. 958 (N.M.C.M.R.1994); see Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) (defining obscenity for First Amendment purposes). Even the non-binding "Drafters’ Analysis" to the Manual for Courts-Martial states "indecent” and "obscene” are synonymous. MCM, app. 21, A21-102, ¶ 89; MCM, Part I, ¶ 4 discussion; but see Pacifica Foundation, supra (<HOLDING>). However, we do not view these elaborations or

A: holding a regulation is contentneutral as long as it is justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech
B: recognizing obscene and indecent have different meanings and indecent speech may be regulated under some circumstances without transgressing the first amendment
C: holding that under fraser there is no first amendment protection for lewd vulgar indecent and plainly offensive speech in school
D: holding that first amendment protections apply to compelled speech as well as restrictions on speech
B.