With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and final. We disagree because not all written orders are final. See Smith v. Love, 101 N.M. 355, 356, 683 P.2d 37, 38 (1984); State v. Durant, 2000-NMCA-066, 129 N.M. 345, 7 P.3d 495; Levenson v. Haynes, 1997-NMCA-020, ¶ 10, 123 N.M. 106, 934 P.2d 300 (describing a written order as interlocutory and subject to modification or reconsideration by the trial court); High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of Albuquerque, 119 N.M. 29, 37, 888 P.2d 475, 483 (Ct.App.1994) (stating that a letter is a non-final order or judgment, and that final orders must be formal and contain decretal language). Defendant’s logic that the order must be final because it is in writing is strained in this case, where the written document clearly indicates on its face that the proceedings a 8, 984 P.2d 775 (<HOLDING>). {25} Defendant also makes no argument why

A: holding that the trial courts oral pronouncement must conform to the written judgment
B: holding that oral discharge of jury terminated jeopardy
C: holding that oral declarations of mistrial which discharge the jury are unlike other oral decisions by the trial court which are not binding and are subject to change until a final written order or judgment is entered
D: holding that decisions by prior panels are binding
C.