With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Plaintiff brought suit against Keene on theories of strict liability in tort for defective products and negligent failure to warn of the dangers of asbestos-containing insulation products. The jury verdict against Keene provided compensation for Boyett’s pain and suffering; his lost wages up until the time of his death; and his medical and funeral expenses. Plaintiffs settlement with the Shipowners released multiple claims in admiralty for loss of society; punitive damages; Boy ett’s pain and suffering, medical expenses and funeral expenses; maintenance and cure; and plaintiff’s loss of support. Because Boyett was a seaman, plaintiffs claims arose pursuant to maritime law. See East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval, Inc., 476 U.S. 858, 106 S.Ct. 2295, 90 L.Ed.2d 865 (1986) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, the issues of offset and

A: holding that general maritime law preempts state law
B: recognizing loss of society damages as remedy available under general maritime law
C: recognizing products liability concepts as part of general maritime law
D: recognizing that the constitutional concepts do not comfortably fit the activities or products of a corporation
C.