With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". motion to suppress didn’t raise that issue.” Snowden clearly did not raise this issue in his written motion. And at the suppression hearing he elicited only limited testimony about the events after the agents decided to converge on his car. In response to a question by the court during his closing argument, Snowden contended that the use of “excessive force” — by which he meant drawn weapons — turned any legitimate Terry stop into a full arrest requiring probable cause. To the extent that Snowden’s argument is preserved for our review, it is unavailing. When police officers reasonably believe they are dealing with a person about to engage in a substantial drug transaction, they may use the degree of restraint necessary for their own control and safety. See Askew, 403 F.3d at 506-07 (<HOLDING>); United States v. Tilmon, 19 F.3d 1221, 1228

A: holding that agents did not escalate terry stop into custodial arrest by blockading suspects car and approaching with guns drawn
B: holding that officers action of putting suspects on the ground and searching for weapons was within the scope of a terry stop
C: holding a fourth amendment terry detention is not a custodial arrest and the use of handcuffs does not automatically convert a temporary detention into a fourth amendment arrest
D: holding that a defendants response to even an invalid arrest or terry stop may constitute independent grounds for arrest
A.