With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". inclinations to deem protective cross-appeals impermissible” because “refusing to hear [them] will streamline cases on appeal and prevent prevailing parties from deluging the courts with unnecessary protective cross-appeals[,]” and noting such practice would “eliminatef ] the question of whether a non-aggrieved party filing a protective cross-appeal must raise every potential ap-pealable issue for fear of waiver”). While appellant cites a case in which this Court has found an issue waived due to a party’s failure to raise the same on cross-appeal, that case is distinguishable as it involved an issue on which the lower court’s holding was adverse to the appel-lee. See Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Alto-Reste Park Cemetery Association, 453 Pa. 124, 306 A.2d 881, 885 (1973) (<HOLDING>). In Alto-Reste, the Commission ordered

A: holding appellee precluded from challenging propriety of amended final order  issue decided adversely to it by commonwealth court  where failed to raise same in crossappeal
B: holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus failed to preserve the issue for appellate review
C: holding that courts are precluded from reconsidering issues that have already been decided in the same case
D: holding that where defendant failed to raise defense of plaintiffs fraud in federal court defendant is barred from raising that issue in state court
A.