With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". necessary if contract formed under § 2-207(1)). Section 2-207(2) provides: [t]he additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless: (a) the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer; (b) they materially alter it; or (c) notification of objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received. However, because the parties did not form a contract under § 2-207(1), we need not address Christy's arguments as to the applicability of § 2-207(2). 4 . Courts and commentators have read § 2-207(3)'s reference to “supplementary terms” differently. Compare Dresser Indus., Inc. v. Gradall Co., 965 F.2d 1442, 1451 (7th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); 2 W. Hawkland, Uniform Commercial Code Series

A: holding that construction that neutralizes any provision of a contract should not be adopted if the contract can be construed to give effect to all provisions
B: holding that the hearing provisions of the ina supersede the provisions of the apa
C: holding that contracts should be interpreted to give effect to all provisions
D: holding that all of the uccs provisions should be used in discerning the terms of a contract under  22073 including those provisions that allow us to examine the parties performance
D.