With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or of nude women in sexually provocative poses would not be insulated from Title VII claims simply because the photos were observable by all office employees, White and Black, male and female.” 192 F.3d at 320 (Newman, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). The majority in Brennan found it unnecessary to reach this common-exposure issue to resolve that particular case, see id. at 319, but we now adopt Judge Newman’s reasoning and that of the Fourth Circuit in rejecting Bell Atlantic’s argument that the common exposure of male and female workers to sexually offensive material necessarily precludes a woman from relying on such evidence to establish a hostile work environment based on sex. See also Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc., 760 F.Supp. 1486, 1522-23 (M.D.Fla.1991) (<HOLDING>). In sum, although all Bell Atlantic employees

A: holding that an employers policy requiring female employees to make larger pension fund contributions than male employees was discriminatory on its face in violation of title vii
B: holding that white female had standing under title vii to challenge her employees alleged racial discrimination against blacks
C: holding that evidence established a municipal custom within the police department of a code of silence regarding sexual harassment of female officers and of retaliation against female officers who complained about same
D: holding that sexually provocative pictures of nude and partially nude women which were put up before any female employees joined the workplace had a disproportionately demeaning impact on female employees and as such conveyed the message that women do not belong
D.