With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and received interline shipments to and from Texas and sent sales people to Texas to develop business, negotiate contracts and service national accounts: Wilson v. Belin, 20 F.3d 644, 651 (5th Cir. 1994)("Even if [the defendant's] contacts with Texas via his short-lived malpractice insurance arrangement through a Texas law firm and his multi-year pro bono association with the historical society were arguably continuous, we hold that they were not substantial enough to warrant the imposition of general personal jurisdiction over him.”); Access Telecom, 197 F.3d at 717 (in order to confer general jurisdiction it is not sufficient that a corporation do business in Texas; it must have a business presence in Texas); Alpine View Co. v. Atlas Copco AB, 205 F.3d 208, 218 (5th Cir. 2000)(<HOLDING>). Johnston, 523 F.3d at 610-12 (concluding that

A: holding that general jurisdiction did not exist where the defendant occasionally sold products to entities in texas that used the defendants products for projects in texas and the defendants employees made field visits to texas between december 1992 and december 1993
B: holding that where the entity was incorporated in texas and the shareholders reside in texas and the bankruptcy case is pending in texas texas law  not arizona law  should be applied
C: holding there was no general jurisdiction when there was no evidence that defendants advertised or promoted their goods or services in texas solicited business in texas sold their goods or services to a texas entity established a general business office or general business presence in texas or targeted texas markets
D: holding sending two employees to work in texas and using an office in texas for limited purposes did not support finding of general jurisdiction
A.