With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". over this case upon removal to that court. See Stewart Title Co. v. Street, 731 S.W.2d 737, 739 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1987, no writ); Henke Gmin Co. v. Keenan, 658 S.W.2d 343, 346 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1983, no writ). However, once the bankruptcy court ordered the case remanded and mailed a certified copy of the remand order to the state district court, that court was revested with jurisdiction over this case. See Dallas Bank & Trust Co. v. Frigiking, Inc., 692 S.W.2d 163, 165 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (finding the termination of the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction was complete when it mailed a certified copy of the remand order to the district clerk of Dallas County); see also Quaestor Inv., Inc. v. State of Chiapas, 997 S.W.2d 226, 227 (Tex.1999) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). Academy alternatively contends that this case

A: holding that mere entry of a remand order divests a federal court of jurisdiction even where no certified copy of the order was mailed to a state court
B: holding that the state court is revested with jurisdiction when a federal district court executes the remand order and mails a certified copy of the order to the state court
C: holding that the mailing of a certified copy of a remand order to a state court divests federal jurisdiction
D: recognizing that pleadings filed in federal court while the federal court has jurisdiction become part of the state court record on remand
B.