With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that possession of the following depictions violates § 1466A(b)(1): Prosecution Exhibits 26, 27, 28, 30, 34, 40, 54, 55, 77, 90, 106, 120, 121, 122, 123, 132, 143, 149, 154, 156, 157, 183, 184, 206, 277, 285, 316, 319, 326, and 335. 4 . Contrary to the military judge's special findings of Specification 3 of The Charge, we are not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that possession of the depiction in Prosecution Exhibit 13 violates § 1466A(b)(1). 5 . Appellant does not contend that § 1466A(b)(1) is facially unconstitutional. This subsection is neither vague nor overbroad because it explicitly requires the offending material meet the Miller definition of constitutionally unprotected obscenity. See United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285, 293, 297, 128 S.Ct. 1830, 170 L.Ed.2d 650 (2008)

A: holding that a statute whose definitions precisely track the material held constitutionally proscribable in ferber and miller was not facially unconstitutional
B: holding texas flagdesecration statute facially unconstitutional
C: holding that person challenging statute as facially vague must show that the challenged law is unconstitutional in every possible application
D: holding that declaring statute facially unconstitutional deprives trial court of subjectmatter jurisdiction
A.