With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". serious felonies like Rice’s carries additional weight. Taken together, the information presented to Weakley was cause to believe Rice was presently armed and dangerous. The officer was entitled for safety reasons to perform a pat-down search. The district court also discounted the fact that the false identity provided by the back seat passenger contributed to reasonable suspicion vis-a-vis Rice. Given the circumstances here, the passenger’s attempt to hide her identity is entirely consistent with efforts to avoid detection of criminal conduct. Thus, Officer Weakley’s inference that the passenger’s desire to conceal her identity was somehow related to the activities of the car’s three occupants was justified, and our case law supports such an inference. See Dennison, 410 F.3d at 1213 (<HOLDING>). A reasonable officer can infer from the

A: holding that during a routine traffic stop it is reasonable for an officer to search the driver for weapons before placing the driver in a patrol car if placing the driver in the patrol car during the investigation prevents officers or the driver from being subjected to a dangerous condition and placing the driver in the patrol car is the least intrusive means to avoid the dangerous condition
B: holding an officer may order a passenger to get out of a car during a traffic stop and may frisk a passenger for weapons if the officer reasonably suspects the passenger is armed and dangerous
C: holding that a police officer may order an individual out of his car and frisk him for weapons if there is a reasonable belief that the individual is armed and dangerous
D: recognizing as reasonable an officers inference that a driver could be hiding weapons in his car when his passenger had an outstanding warrant for a weapons violation
D.