With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in the appellate record, a bulletin from the Texas Department of Insurance. Our review is confined to the evidence in the appellate record. See Sabine. Offshore Serv., Inc. v. City of Port Arthur, 595 S.W.2d 840, 841 (Tex.1979); Sewell v. Adams, 854 S.W.2d 257, 259 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ). It is improper for any party to cite unpublished judgments and orders from various courts as authority when such items do not appear in the appellate record. See Tex.R.App.P. 47.7; Carlisle v. Philip Morris, Inc., 805 S.W.2d 498, 501 (Tex.App. — Austin 1991, writ denied). It is also improper for parties to rely on matters outside the record in making arguments to the court. See, e.g., Melendez v. Exxon Corp., 998 S.W.2d 266, 280 (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we shall strike and not consider

A: holding that parties have burden of compiling record  that will adequately preserve their arguments for review in the event of an appeal 
B: holding that arguments that are not raised or that are not accompanied by factual and legal support are deemed waived
C: holding that claims must put parties on sufficient notice of underlying arguments or arguments are deemed waived
D: holding parties are to confine their arguments and factual recitations to matters contained in the record
D.