With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a “special injury” under Iowa law? 3. Under the facts of this case, is the loss of financing, or interference with financing, a “special injury” under Iowa law? 4. Does Plaintiffs stress, accompanied by neck and back pain, constitute “special injury” under the facts of the case? Pursuant to our certification statute and in the exercise of our discretion, we now choose to answer these four certified questions. See Iowa Code § 684A.1 (stating we may answer a certified question where (1) it was certified by a proper court; (2) is a question of Iowa law; (3) “may be determinative of the cause ... pending in the certifying court”; and (4) it appears to the certifying court that there is no controlling Iowa precedent). But see Eley v. Pizza Hut, Inc., 500 N.W.2d 61, 63-64 (Iowa 1993) (<HOLDING>). II. The Certified Questions A. “Does the

A: holding failure to object to conditioning instructions waived error arising from the jurys failure to answer question when answer could not be implied and that lack of objection waived right to new trial to have jury answer questions
B: holding that government could not impeach witness with prior statement because he refused to answer any questions and thus gave no testimony in court with which the prior statement could be judged to be inconsistent
C: holding appellant could not obtain a new trial so that jury could answer liability question because the charge instructed the jury not to answer the question based on its answer to a prior question and because appellant did not object to this instruction
D: recognizing discretion and declining to answer propounded questions because the statement of facts accompanying the certification were not specific enough
D.