With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". at issue here, RSA 212:34 and RSA 508:14. I. RSA 508:11 RSA 508:14,1, provides in pertinent part: An owner, occupant, or lessee of land, including the state or any political subdivision, who without charge permits any person to use land for recreational purposes or as a spectator of recreational activity, shall not be liable for personal injury or property damage in the absence of intentionally caused injury or damage. (Emphasis added.) The defendants argue that the phrase, “any person,” evidences a legislative intent “to broadly immunize landowners in this state” from liab wise “would immunize even homeowners from the negligence claims of social guests invited for recreational purposes.” Perrine, 911 P.2d at 1293; see also Mozier v. Parsons, 852 F. Supp. 925, 932 (D. Kan. 1994) (<HOLDING>). In Conant, the Oregon Court of Appeals

A: holding that kansas recreational use statute does not immunize homeowner from liability for wrongful death of child who drowned in backyard swimming pool
B: holding a wrongful death action may not be maintained for the death of an unborn child
C: holding that plaintiffs failure to prove decedents death was caused by the wrongful acts of the defendant precludes any recovery of wrongful death damages under mississippis wrongful death statute
D: recognizing cause of action for wrongful death
A.