With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 9 .The judge made no specific finding with respect to two issues that might have been of some importance, namely, whether Henson had access to other housing, as he had earlier told Prue that he would have, and whether he suffered pain and distress as a result of not being able to use his medication. The judge also cut off Henson's attorney somewhat abruptly when he requested an opportunity to argue on the issue of damages, but Henson has not raised this or any other procedural issue on appeal. 10 . It appears that Prue's premises may have been in the nature of a rooming house, and Henson may have been a roomer rather than a tenant. If he was, then the prohibition against self-help evictions may not have been applicable. Cf. Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025, 1029 (D.C.2001) (<HOLDING>). No party has raised this issue, however, and

A: holding that a provider of transientaccommodations may use selfhelp to evict a nonpaying lodger
B: holding intent to use or threaten to use force is required under  2l12bla
C: holding evidence which established that use of property was permissive showed use of property was not adverse
D: holding that continued possession and unrestricted use constitutes regular use
A.