With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". law will significantly compromise recognized First Amendment protections. Id. ¶14 Determining whether a law prohibits a substantial amount of protected speech involves striking a balance between competing social interests. Id. “[W]e must weigh the amount of protected speech proscribed by the [law] against the amount of unprotected speech that the [law] legitimately prohibits.” Id. The policy concern is that the threat of enforcement of a law prohibiting some amount of constitutionally protected speech will deter or chill such speech. Id. at 8. 3. Overbreadth Analysis ¶15 We engage in a four-part analysis to determine whether a law is facially overbroad under the First Amendment. First, we must determine whether the challenged law actually prohibits speech. See Immelt, 173 Wn.2d at 7 (<HOLDING>). Here, RCW 9A.40.090 clearly prohibits certain

A: holding thirty days in disciplinary segregation does not rise to the level of punishment invoking the due process clause
B: holding any improper delegation did not rise to level of plain error
C: holding a transfer or reassignment may rise to the level of an adverse employment condition if it is a significant change in working conditions
D: holding that horn honking may rise to the level of speech
D.