With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or hold harmless the promisee, the promisee’s independent contractots, agents, employees, or indemnitees against liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property proximately caused by or resulting from the negligence, in whole or in part, of the promisee, its independent contractors, agents, employees, or indemnitees, is against public policy and is void and unenforceable. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 22B-1 (2007) (emphasis added). This statute is not applicable in the present case. The contract at issue involves a clause that limits a party’s liability, not an indemnity clause whereby one party agrees to be liable for the negligence of the other party. See Int’l Paper Co. v. Corporex Constructors, Inc., 96 N.C. App. 312, 315, 385 S.E.2d 553, 555 (1989) (<HOLDING>). Further, the language of the statute only

A: recognizing that the rules of statutory construction apply when we interpret constitutional provisions
B: holding that the hearing provisions of the ina supersede the provisions of the apa
C: holding that courts interpret indemnity provisions same as written contracts
D: holding that the indemnity provisions to which gs  22b1 apply are those construction indemnity provisions which attempt to hold one party responsible for the negligence of another
D.