With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by bolstering the opinion testimony of Dr. Proctor with substantive content from the 2014 Report, Plaintiff improperly enhanced the expert’s credibility with the jury. This court has held that such improper bolstering ean .be so prejudicial as to rise to the level of fundamental error and require a new trial. Cordoba, 939 So.2d at 323. The Reports did not constitute original research performed by the Office of the Surgeon General; rather, they summarized and compiled' a mix of information, opinion and advocacy from outside sources. As such, the Reports “represent ] a' classic example of hearsay,” being “nothing more than ... written statements of the de-clarantes]” who drafted the various contributions. Sikes v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 429 So.2d 1216, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (<HOLDING>). Admitting the Reports at trial effectively

A: holding that the stateissued florida handbook for drivers was inadmissible hearsay
B: holding that defendants bank account and open line of credit in florida utilized to transfer money in international commerce was insufficient to confer jurisdiction under section 481932 florida statutes where defendant operated its business in honduras had no employees or agents in florida and did not advertise or solicit business in florida
C: holding new york could lawfully modify a florida custody decree because florida court had right under florida law to change the decree
D: holding that when an accident occurs outside florida workers compensation benefits are payable only if the contract of employment was made in florida or if the employees employment is principally located in florida
A.