With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". The opposing counsel then has 30 days after receiving notice to object to the specific disclosure. (Protective Order ¶ 6). The defendants argue that Mr. Damiano has sought to commercially exploit his allegations against Bob Dylan. They further assert that a willing market does exist to assist the plaintiff with the distribution of his unpublished manuscript. (Snyder Affid. ¶ 2). The defendants’ express concern is that Mr. Damiano can take raw discovery from this ease and use it in his manuscript. (Id. at If 6—8). The plaintiff has not provided any substantive argument against labeling discovery materials as confidential. Nevertheless, the Third Circuit has required that courts carefully consider the balancing test discussed supra, prior to requiring disclosure. Pansy, 23 F.3d at 792 (<HOLDING>). 1. Factors in Favor of Disclosure Two factors

A: recognizing that the strong presumption against protective orders necessitates a balancing of interests
B: recognizing a strong presumption favoring arbitrability
C: recognizing presumption
D: recognizing strong presumption against interlocutory appeals
A.