With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Contrary to appellant’s argument, the officer

A: holding that the subjective intent of the officer is no longer determinative wjhen applying the objective test generally the only determination to be made is whether probable cause existed for the stop in question and that per whren a violation of traffic law provided sufficient probable cause to make the subsequent search and seizure reasonable
B: holding that florida courts are required to follow whrens objective test and determine only whether probable cause existed for the traffic stop in question
C: holding this framework applies whether the traffic stop is based on probable cause or reasonable suspicion
D: holding that a conclusion that reasonable suspicion supported the stop of a vehicle was subsumed within the trial courts ruling that the officer had probable cause for the stop
B.