With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". residents of the apartment house.” Id. The defendant committed only a “minor act of vandalism” on a car in the parking lot. Id. In contrast, the defendants in Roth created a hazardous condition because altercations could have occurred. Roth, 531 A.2d at 1137. A physically offensive condition, within the meaning of § 5503(a)(4), “encompasses direct assaults on the physical senses of members of the public.” Williams, 574 A.2d at 1164. “A defendant may create such a condition if she sets off a ‘stink bomb’, strews rotting garbage in public places, or shines blinding lights in the eyes of others.” Id. Likewise, a physically offensive condition can occur where the defendant invades the physical privacy of the victim. Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Young, 370 Pa.Super. 42, 535 A.2d 1141 (1988) (<HOLDING>), appeal denied, 518 Pa. 649, 544 A.2d 961

A: holding construction company had actual notice of dangerous condition that its employees created
B: holding that two male defendants created a physically offensive condition by entering a bathroom stall and confronting a woman sitting on a toilet
C: holding that contractor owed general negligence duty to thirdparty by dangerous condition contractor created on road
D: holding that proof of control was not required where the injury arose from the condition of the work place created by or known to the contraetor
B.