With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". identifying physical characteristic outside [the Fifth Amendment’s] protection.” Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 266-67, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967). This is so because “[t]he handwriting itself (as opposed to the content of a written statement) is physical, not testimonial evidence.” United States v. McDougal, 137 F.3d 547, 559 (8th Cir.1998) (citing Gilbert, 388 U.S. at 266-67, 87 S.Ct. 1951). Thus, it is settled that a defendant in a criminal case may be compelled to furnish a handwriting exemplar and it is also settled that “introducing samples of the defendant’s handwriting at trial do[es] not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.” McDougal, 137 F.3d at 559. A prosecutor is likewise permitted to comment on, and indeed prese 10th Cir.1978) (<HOLDING>). Given these conclusions, it is now necessary

A: holding that a plaintiff had no injury in fact and consequently no standing when it had no enforceable contract right against the defendant
B: recognizing that defendant had no right to withhold the requested exemplars
C: recognizing right to withhold lifesustaining treatment from a formerly competent adult in a permanent vegetative state
D: recognizing the right to counsel on appeal
B.