With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Thus, to establish third-party consent justifying a warrant-less entry, the Government must show that (1) the third party had actual or apparent authority to consent to entry into the home, and (2) the consent was freely and voluntarily given. United States v. Sanchez, 608 F.3d 685, 689 (10th Cir.2010). Mr. White does not contest that Ms. Webster had actual authority to consent to the officers’ entry into the home. He frequently refers to the residence as “her home” and notes that the firearm was retrieved from “her bedroom.” Aplt. Br. at 5. On several occasions, we have held that if family members or other cohabitants have access to the residence, they have actual authority to consent to an entry or search of the home. See United States v. Bass, 661 F.3d 1299, 1305 (10th Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1816, 182

A: holding that a warrantless search of a shared dwelling was reasonable as to one occupant who gave consent but not to another who did not
B: holding search invalid under the fourth amendment when a physicallypresent occupant expressly objected to a search  notwithstanding the consent of a fellow occupant
C: holding defendants girlfriend had authority to consent to search as a joint occupant
D: holding consent not voluntary where police threatened to arrest defendants girlfriend if he refused to sign consent form
C.