With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". contingent interests. Segal, 382 U.S. at 379, 86 S.Ct. at 515. The contingent nature of Bracewell’s interest is similar to a loss carryback that may result in a tax refund if the taxpayer has the proper tax characteristics at the end of the year, Segal, 382 U.S. at 381, 86 S.Ct. at 516; a casualty of war that may result in payment from the execution of a treaty and legislation after the discharge of bankruptcy, Williams, 140 U.S. at 541, 11 S.Ct. at 888; the provision of overtime services to the government that may lead to payment based on post-petition legislation, Milnor, 41 U.S. at 227; or pre-petition harm caused by legal malpractice that may result in damages pending judicial process, Alvarez, 224 F.3d at 1277-78. See also In re Dalton, 146 B.R. 460, 463 (Bankr.D.Ariz.1992) (<HOLDING>). Bracewell, like the debtors in Segal,

A: holding that a lottery ticket purchased prepetition that won postpetition was included in the debtor estate
B: holding that a postpetition claim under section 1305 is a liability that arises postpetition and relates only to postpetition activity
C: holding that claims harming the debtor corporation that arose from prepetition conduct become property of the estate under 11 usc  541a1
D: holding that creditors cannot allow postpetition funds to be automatically applied to a prepetition indebtedness absent some positive indication that debtors indeed intend to voluntarily assume their prepetition debts
A.