With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the non-moving party’s case. Id. If the moving party discharges its burden by negating an essential element of the non-moving party’s claim or defense, it must produce affirmative evidence of such negation. Id. at 1105. Once the moving party carries its initial burden, the burden then shifts to the non-moving party to produce “specific evidence, through affidavits or admissible discovery material, to show that the dispute exists.” Bhan v. NME Hosps., Inc., 929 F.2d 1404, 1409 (9th Cir.1991). The non-moving party cannot meet its burden merely by making assertions in its legal memoranda; rather, it must point to specific evidence in the record demonstrating a genuine issue for trial. Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 324, 106 S.Ct. 2548; Nissan Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., 210 F.3d at 1107 (<HOLDING>); S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense

A: holding that once the moving party meets its burden the nonmoving party is obliged to produce evidence in response
B: holding the moving party must meet its burden by showing  that is pointing out to the trial court that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving partys case
C: recognizing that the burden on summary judgment shifts to the nonmoving party once the moving party has met its initial responsibility of showing the absence of a triable issue of fact and that the moving party is entitled to summary judgment if the nonmoving party fails to make a sufficient showing on an essential element of the case
D: holding that the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and all doubts are resolved against the moving party
A.