With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". explosives — may involve merely negligent or reckless conduct” (citations omitted)); United States v. Zuniga, 553 F.3d 1330, 1334-35 (10th Cir.2009) (finding it "reasonable to surmise that those who possess deadly weapons in a penal institution typically intend to possess them,” and thus concluding that the Texas statute criminalizing that conduct, whether intentional, knowing or reckless, satisfied Be-gay ). Furthermore, in pre-Begay cases, we held in other contexts that a PSAS violation is not a crime of violence because such a violation may be committed with a mens rea lower than intent. See United States v. Otero, 502 F.3d 331, 335 (3d Cir.2007) (concluding that a PSAS violation is not a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2); Popal v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 249, 254 (3d Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). 9 . Johnson argues that Pennsylvania simple

A: holding that a conviction under colorevstat  186401 for criminally negligent child abuse was not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16a because physical force was not an element of that crime
B: holding that seconddegree manslaughter was not a crime of violence and thus was not an aggravated felony warranting an aliens removal
C: holding that an aliens psas conviction was not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16a that would render the alien removable as an aggravated felon
D: holding that bank robbery by force and violence or intimidation under 18 usc  2113a is a crime of violence
C.