With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that "unrelated topics appearing in the motion for summary judgment may also be reviewed via the same proceeding”; (3) the Johnsons created a fact issue by certifying through their counsel that they had exhausted all administrative remedies; and (4) "claims of malicious prosecution inherently involve activity or misconduct outside the administrative avenues created by the workers’ compensation laws,” nothing in the Act "purports to regulate such conduct or remedy ... damages unrelated to the amount of workers’ compensation benefits to which an employee may be entitled,” and "because at least one cause of action continues to exist, despite Ruttiger, we cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in r , 2013 WL 5853747, at *4 (Tex.App.-Austin Oct. 18, 2013, no pet.) (mem.op.) (<HOLDING>); Bean v. Tex. Mut. Ins. Co., No.

A: holding that mere negligence does not implicate the right to due process
B: holding that ruttiger eliminates claims because there is no evidence of any conduct that does not implicate the claimsettlement process and all claims are limited to complaints about delays claim handling and disputes regarding entitlement to benefits
C: holding that ruttiger precludes claims for breach of contract breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing insurance code and dtpa violations and negligence because all claims arise out of the carriers handling of the workers compensation claim
D: holding that carrier was entitled to summary judgment on claim regarding false statements that claimants were not entitled to coverage because the claim was limited to complaints about delays claim handling and disputes regarding entitlement to benefits
B.