With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". with proposed charges to the District Attorney. On June 26, 2007, the District Attorney approved all charges. On July 2, 2007, Guth filed the approved charges against Schell with respect to both the R.T. and J.S. matters. (R.R. at 274a-80a (R.T.), 300a-04a (J.S.).) Guth supported the police criminal complaints with affidavits of probable cause. Contrary to Schell’s claim, the affidavit of probable cause with respect to the R.T. charges relies, at least in part, on the statement that the alleged victim, R.T., gave on February 19, 2007, during which R.T. confirmed the events that supported the criminal charges and corroborated the statements of friends and others interviewed as part of the criminal investigation. See Commonwealth v. Dickerson, 468 Pa. 599, 608, 364 A.2d 677, 682 (1976) (<HOLDING>). Similarly, the affidavit for probable cause

A: holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same
B: holding that probable cause is a complete defense to an action for false arrest
C: holding that hearsay evidence may be considered on summary judgment if the same evidence would be admissible in another form at trial
D: holding that hearsay evidence is considered valuable evidence in testing probable cause to arrest
D.