With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 10 to 15 cents higher than that.” Rudnick Aff. II at 9. First, the Court questions Mr. Rudnick’s conclusion that Haagen-Dazs is the price leader where Winter Hill’s October 14, 1987 order guide contains the following suggested retail prices for 16-ounce packages of frozen desserts: Howard Johnson — $1.79, Dole — $1.98, Tofutti — $2.79, Haagen-Dazs-$1.89, Frusen Gladje — $2.08, Mousse d'Jour — $1.99, and Steve's — $2.19. Affidavit of Michael L. Baily, Exhibit B. Second, and more importantly, this conclusory statement of the pricing differentials in the super premium ice cream market, which is not supported by specific factual data, is insufficient evidence that Haagen-Dazs is in fact the price leader in the market. Cf. United States v. Hall, 424 F.Supp. 508, 533-34 (W.D.Okla.1975) (<HOLDING>), aff’d, 536 F.2d 313 (10th Cir.) cert, denied,

A: holding that a motion requesting a trial judge to disqualify himself and the affidavit in support thereof were insufficient in part due to their conclusory nature
B: holding that while it was error for the regular judge to disqualify himself for only the habitual phase of the trial the error was harmless
C: holding that an intervening party was not precluded from filing an affidavit to disqualify a judge despite the fact that there had been an earlier motion to set the cause for trial because the intervenors did not become parties to the action until their motion for intervention was granted
D: holding that vague conclusory statements are insufficient
A.