With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Worldwide Express, 294 F.3d 1179, 1183-84 (9th Cir. 2002) 15 . Grable & Sons Metal Prods., Inc. v. Darue Eng’g & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308, 314, 125 S.Ct. 2363, 162 L.Ed.2d 257 (2005). 16 . Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana, 522 U.S. 470, 475, 118 S.Ct. 921, 139 L.Ed.2d 912 (1998). 17 . Retail Property Trust v. United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, 768 F.3d 938, 947 (9th Cir. 2014). 18 . Caterpillar Inc., 482 U.S. at 392, 107 S.Ct. 2425. 19 . Wayne, 294 F.3d at 1183-84. 20 . The three are: (1) § 301 of the LMRA, 29 U.S.C. § 185; (2) § 502(a) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a); and (3) §§ 85 and 86 of t id not preempt passenger's state-law claim alleging that airplane stairs were defectively designed because FAA does not pervasively regulate airstairs); Ventress, 747 F.3d at 722-23 (<HOLDING>). My narrow reading of Montalvo and Martin is

A: holding that faas pervasive pilot medical standards preempted wrongfuldischarge claims that required determination of a pilots medical fitness to fly
B: holding that an aljs own medical analysis which is contrary to medical evidence is invalid
C: holding that plaintiffs claim that medical providers did not comply with baker act was not subject to medical malpractice statutes ajlthough a medical diagnosis is necessary in order to involuntarily commit a patient the process of complying with the statute does not require medical skill or judgment
D: recognizing that prison officials should defer to medical professionals on medical matters
A.