With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and wove between lanes on several occasions. Morales’s testimony was more than a scintilla of evidence to support the ALJ’s finding that Bell failed to maintain a single lane of traffic and was sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that Bell was driving while intoxicated or that some activity out of the ordinary was occurring, so as to justify the temporary stop of Bell’s vehicle. See id; see also Texas Dept, of Public Safety v. Seidule, 991 S.W.2d 290, 293 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, no pet.) (finding substantial evidence to support finding of reasonable suspicion based on officer’s statement that driver of vehicle failed to maintain a single marked lane); Texas Dept, of Public Safety v. Nordin, 971 S.W.2d 90, 94 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Bell asserts that the decision in Hernandez

A: holding that a police officer may stop a driver where the officer has a reasonable and articulable suspicion regarding the commission of a civil traffic violation
B: holding an officer could ask for consent to search the trunk of a car where he had reasonable suspicion that the driver had crossed the border illegally and could be transporting illegal aliens
C: holding that an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct traffic stop even when his suspicion that a law has been violated is based on a reasonable mistake of law
D: holding alj correctly held that officer had reasonable suspicion to make stop based on observation that driver crossed over shoulder stripe and was weaving within his traveling lane
D.