With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 322, 111 S.Ct. 1267, 1273, 113 L.Ed.2d 335 (1991) (citations omitted). “This requirement of judgment or choice is not satisfied if a ‘federal statute, regulation, or policy specifically prescribes a course of action for an employee to follow,’ because ‘the employee has no rightful option but to adhére to the directive.’ ” Id. (quoting Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 536, 108 S.Ct. 1954, 1958-59, 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988)). Second, the judgment or decision must be grounded on considerations of social, economic, or political public policy. Id. at 323-24, 111 S.Ct. at 1273-74. a. Discretionary Conduct The United States is under no statutory duty to establish an aid to navigation at a particular place. See Tringali Bros. v. United States, 630 F.2d 1089, 1090 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980) (<HOLDING>). Although, the Coast Guard has the specific

A: holding that the coast guard has no statutory duty to place navigational aids in hazardous waterways but is authorized to do so
B: holding no duty and noting that foreseeability bears on the scope of a duty and not whether it exists in the first place
C: holding where there is no duty to defend there is no duty to indemnify
D: holding that trial court has no duty to establish waiver on record
A.