With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Angelina Damitas Echeverria-Ruiz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal ng that it is “more likely than not” that the government would persecute her upon return to Guatemala. See Hakeem, 273 F.3d at 816. Echeverria-Ruiz’s due process claim fails, because even if the corroborating declaration were given full weight, it would merely confirm rather than add to other evidence in the record, and EcheverriaRuiz would still be unable to establish entitlement to withholding of removal. See Halaim v. INS, 358 F.3d 1128, 1136 (9th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). Echeverria-Ruiz did not raise, and therefore

A: holding that an alien must show error and substantial prejudice in order to prevail on a due process claim
B: holding that to prevail on a claim that an immigration hearing was procedurally insufficient the petitioner must demonstrate prejudice
C: holding petitioner must show prejudice to prevail on due process claim
D: holding that a petitioner must show prejudice in order to prevail on a claim that he or she was denied a full and fair hearing in violation of due process
C.