With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". it concerns a change of work schedule and attendant reduction in pay. Although both Shebar and Woolley involve implied contracts that protect the employee against arbitrary termination, the principle of holding an em , 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 427, 904 P.2d 834, 839 (1995) (“[TJhere is no rational reason why an employer’s policy that its employees will not be demoted except for good cause, like a policy restricting termination or providing for severance pay, cannot become an implied term of an employment contract.”); Sledge v. New Haven Coliseum Auth., 1996 WL 548163 (Conn.Super.1996) (recognizing employee’s right to establish implied contract governing right to annual performance evaluations and wage and benefit reviews); Popovich v. Bekaert Corp., 222 Ga.App. 395, 474 S.E.2d 286, 288 (1996) (<HOLDING>). The Appellate Division held that the evidence

A: holding county employee with unenforceable contract was atwill employee
B: holding that severance pay policy was part of employment contract
C: holding that employee may claim contract created based on employer promise of severance pay to employee
D: holding that an employers promise to pay a bonus to an employee was not enforceable where the employee was already obligated under a written contract to perform the services in question
C.