With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". consented and approved a memorandum from defendant Marelia countermanding the attempt by plaintiff to reassign parking spaces), 40 & 42 (stating that all defendants consented and approved the taking over by defendant Marelia of the responsibilities of plaintiff), 49-50 (stating that the defendant Justices ordered plaintiff removed from the Administrative Board). Taking all inferences in the favor of plaintiff, as required at this stage of the proceedings, this Court concludes that the allegations of the involvement of defendants in the various specific actiohs taken against plaintiff, combined with the general allegation of intentional disparate treatment because of his race, is sufficient to defeat the motion by defendants to dismiss as to this count. See Andrews, 895 F.2d at 1478 (<HOLDING>) (citation omitted); District Council J7, Am.

A: holding that the necessary involvement can be shown in two ways either through allegations of personal direction or of actual knowledge and acquiescence
B: holding that a supervisor with no personal involvement may be liable for the constitutional violation of a subordinate for culpable action or inaction in the training supervision or control of his subordinates acquiescence in the constitutional deprivation  or reckless or callous indifference to the rights of others
C: holding that individual liability under  1983 must be based on personal involvement in the alleged constitutional violation
D: holding that a lent employees acceptance of his special employment status could be implied from his acquiescence to the control and direction of the special employer
A.