With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". are attached. Rather, the basis for this decision is the finding that the parties clearly agreed to treat rring to K.S.A. 79-102). 10 . Id. See also K.S.A. 84-9-102(40), which defines "fixtures” as "goods that have become so related to particular real property that an interest in them arises under real property law.” 11 . In re Sand & Sage Farm & Ranch, Inc., 266 B.R. 507, 511 (Bankr.D.Kan.2001) (citing Peoples State Bank v. Clayton, 2 Kan.App.2d 438, 439, 580 P.2d 1375 (1978)). 12 . See Atchison, T. & S.F.R. Co. v. Morgan, 42 Kan. 23, 21 P. 809, 812 (1889); In re Farmland Indus. Inc., 298 B.R. at 388. 13 . In re Farmland Industries, 298 B.R. at 388 (quoting Atchison, T. & S.F.R. Co., 42 Kan. 23, 21 P. 809 (1889)). 14 . Stalcup v. Detrich, 27 Kan.App.2d 880, 886-87, 10 P.3d 3 (2000) (<HOLDING>). 15 .In re Williams, 381 B.R. 742

A: holding that it is not
B: holding that a metal building attached by metal bolts to a concrete slab with steel girders connected to each bolt and sheeting attached to the steel girders was personal property because a it could be removed although it would take some effort and removal would not cause damage to the real estate b it was not particularly adapted to the farmland on which it sat and c the owners intention at the time of annexation for it to remain personal property was borne out by their provisions that it be separately taxed and that the taxes be paid by a distinct party
C: holding that it may not
D: holding that damage to building and personal property as a result of fire negligently caused by defendant was to be measured by reasonable cash market value of the property at the time it was destroyed by the fire or if it was not totally destroyed by the diminution in its fair market value before and after the fire
B.