With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". waived his right to representation during the resentencing proceeding and counsel was appointed as ''stand-by” counsel only. Downs then single-handedly voir dired the prospective jurors, cross-examined the State’s witnesses, and questioned thirteen of the eighteen defense witnesses called to testify,. a couple of whom included Downs’ family members. Downs subsequently relinquished his right to self-representation near the end of the ■ defense’s case so appointed counsel could- question Dr. Harry Krop, the mental health expert, and the final few witnesses, including Downs. Thus, to the extent Downs could have introduced mitigating evidence concerning his background, he may not complain on this appeal of counsel's failure to do the same. See Goode v. State, 403 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla.1981) (<HOLDING>). 14 . As noted earlier in this opinion, the

A: holding that defendant waived his right to selfrepresentation where he told the trial judge before trial that he did not want to represent himself and the public defender acted as counsel for the remainder of trial without objection
B: holding that where defendant knowingly waived right to counsel and was fully informed of perils of selfrepresentation and trial court appointed attorney for purpose of giving legal advice when needed defendant acted as his own attorney and could not later complain that his cocounsel ineffectively corepresented him
C: holding that a defendant can knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel only after his sic is aware of the nature of the charges against him the possible penalties and the dangers and disadvantages of selfrepresentation
D: holding that the defendant validly waived right to conflictfree representation where the defendant knew a conflict existed its effect on his defense and his right to have other counsel appointed
B.