With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the plaintiff suffered actual injury, such as a loss of sales, profits, or of present value. Resource Developers, Inc. v. Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island, 926 F.2d 134, 139 (2nd Cir.1991); Web Printing Controls Co., Inc. v. Oxy-Dry Corp., 906 F.2d 1202, 1204-05 (7th Cir.1990); PPX Enterprises, Inc. v. Audiofidelity Enterprises, Inc., supra at 271-72. When a plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief, however, it need only prove a likelihood of confu sion among consumers that has resulted from the defendant’s violation. Resource Developers, Inc. v. Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island, supra; Web Printing Controls Co., Inc. v. Oxy-Dry Corp.; PPX Enterprises, Inc. v. Audiofidelity Enterprises, Inc., supra at 271; cf., Black Hills Jewelry Mfg. Co. v. Gold Rush, Inc., 633 F.2d 746, 753 (8th Cir.1980) (<HOLDING>). Further, where a defendant has engaged in

A: holding that in order to recover damages under the lanham act plaintiff must prove that there was a violation that plaintiff has been damaged and that there is a causal connection between the violation and those damages
B: holding that a plaintiff in a lanham act trademark violation action must demonstrate that the defendants violation tended to deceive consumers
C: holding that continued use of trademark after termination of franchise for nonpayment of royalties constitutes lanham act violation
D: holding that the defendants reference to the plaintiffs trademark in the metatags of the defendants web page was a violation of trademark law
B.