With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". This matter is before the court on Kenneth Hill’s pro se request for a certificate of appealability (“COA”). Hill seeks a COA so he can appeal the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (providing no appeal may be taken from “the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a State court” unless the petitioner first obtains a COA); Montez v. McKinna, 208 F.3d 862, 867, 869 (10th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). Because Hill has not “made a substantial

A: holding that  2253clas requirements apply when a state habeas petitioner is proceeding under  2241
B: holding  2253clas coa requirement applies to state prisoners proceeding under  2241 when the petition relates to any of the incidents and circumstances of any detention pursuant to state court process
C: holding state prisoners proceeding under  2241 must be granted a coa before their claims can be considered on the merits
D: holding that state prisoners must obtain a coa to appeal denials of 28 usc  2241 petitions
B.