With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". because the Maynards did not utilize the 1999 Ford Rollback truck in interstate commerce. National Indemnity asserted that it consequently possessed no duty to ensure that the Policy satisfied the requirements of 49 C.F.R. § 387.303. J.A. 108. 8 . In the Judgment Order, the district court did not address Brewer's contention that National Indemnity was equitably estopped from denying that she possessed standing because of the Settlement Statement. Brewer first raised this issue in her Rule 60(b) motion after entry of the March Order. Accordingly, that issue was not properly before the district court, and it is not properly before this Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) (authorizing relief from judgment or order only in limited circumstances not applicable here). 9 . Ky.Ct.App.1968) (<HOLDING>). Although perhaps pertinent, these authorities

A: holding that insurer was liable for amount in excess of policy limits because it breached its duty to defend
B: holding assignable to injured party insureds claim against liability insurer for bad faith in negotiating settlement
C: holding assignable to injured party insureds claim against insurer for negligently failing to claim contribution
D: holding assignable to injured party insureds claim against insurer for judgment in excess of policy limits
D.