With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". into a level two stop," Ray, 2000 UT App 55 at { 13 n. 2, 998 P.2d 274, holding an individual's identification card longer than is necessary to obtain the information needed to run a warrants check will. See, eg., Unit ed States v. Johnson, 326 F.3d 1018, 1022 (8th Cir.2003) (stating suspect was seized when, inter alia, police officers "took possession of his personal property-here, his driver's license"), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 962, 124 S.Ct. 425, 157 LEd2d 304 (2003); United States v. Lambert, 46 F.3d 1064, 1068 (10th Cir.1995) ("[When law enforcement officials retain an individual's driver's lHeense in the course of questioning him, that individual, as a general rule, will not reasonably feel free to terminate the encounter."); State v. Painter, 296 Or. 422, 676 P.2d 309, 311 (1984) (<HOLDING>); State v. Daniel, 12 S.W.3d 420, 427

A: holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer
B: holding seizure occurred when police officer retained drivers license while making radio warrants check
C: holding that detention ended when police officer returned drivers license and registration and driver voluntarily consented to additional questioning
D: holding that defendant was not free to leave when officer directed defendant to stay while he conducted a warrants check
B.