With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". should include a common transactional fact or status predicated on the cause of action, the appropriate time span, and geographical boundaries, if applicable, or other pertinent facts or characteristics that would make the class readily identifiable and capable of accurate verification. Newberg, supra § 6:17 at 631-32. When defining a class, Plaintiffs must avoid subjective criteria or circular definitions that depend on the outcome of the litigation. Id. § 6:14. Imprecise, vague, or broad definitions that include persons with little connection to the claims will fail to meet the definiteness requirement. See Earnest, 923 F.Supp. at 1473-74 (finding that the class definition was so vague and broad, the minimum standard of definiteness was not met); see also Harris, 127 F.R.D. at 659 (<HOLDING>). A subjective or merits-based definition can

A: holding the court was not required to decide the issue of whether the district court properly certified a rule 23b2 class because the court already concluded that the district court appropriately certified the class under rule 23b3 citing authority for the proposition that a court need only find that a class action may be maintained under any of the three subdivisions
B: holding that a fraud class action cannot be certified when individual reliance will be an issue
C: holding that a class could not be certified because the definition made class members impossible to identify prior to individualized factfinding and litigation and thereby failed to satisfy one of the basic requirements for a class action under rule 23
D: holding the class too imprecise and speculative to be certified
D.