With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". J. Jose Corkidi, Max Carlos Lederman, Michael Levin, Hannah Levin, I 98) (<HOLDING>); Loiselle v. Gladfelter, 160 So.2d 740 (Fla.

A: holding that the defendant by not bringing his knowledge of possible juror bias to the attention of the district court prior to verdict waived his right to a new trial
B: holding that the failure to inform the defendant of his right to a sixperson jury and the failure to consult the defendant as to his wishes was an error for which a new trial was the only remedy
C: holding a selfrepresentation request untimely where made after voir dire had begun but before the jury had been empaneled
D: holding that failure to inform the defendant of the constitutionally mandated right to a sixperson jury when one juror became ill after the jury had been sworn but before trial had begun and the defendants attorney waived his rights without consulting defendant mandates a new trial
D.