With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 59 . See W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., LLC v. Deloitte & Touche LLP, 549 F.3d 100, 106-07 (2d Cir.2008). 60 . See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 358 n. 6, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996) (plaintiffs with one type of injuiy lack standing to challenge a different, though perhaps related, injury, because “standing is not dispensed in gross”). 61 . In re Salomon Analyst Level 3 Litig., 350 F.Supp.2d 477, 496 (S.D.N.Y.2004). Accord Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1476, 1483 (11th Cir.1987) ("a claim cannot be asserted on behalf of a class unless at least one named plaintiff has suffered the injury that gives rise to that claim”); In re Global Crossing, Ltd. Sec. Litig., 313 F.Supp.2d 189, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (same). 62 . See, e.g., Hoffman v. UBS-AG, 591 F.Supp.2d 522, 531 (S.D.N.Y.2008) (<HOLDING>) (citing Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Dmg Stores,

A: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing because the case was not ripe for adjudication
B: holding that the rico bar applies even where the plaintiff does not have standing to bring a securities fraud action
C: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue
D: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to bring securities claims relating to funds that plaintiffs did not own
D.