With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". falls within the latter category because there is an express trust. LCC relies on the language in the bylaws and articles of incorporation for the Property Corporation, which states, in relevant part, that the purpose of the Property Corporation is “[t]o operate exclusively for the benefit of, and to carry out the purposes of the Lamont Christian Reformed Church, Coopersville, Michigan, or any church formed by a majority of the members of the Lamont Christian Reformed Church ....” Reliance on this language is only valid, however, as long as LCRC had the authority to set up the Property Corporation and transfer ownership of the church property to the Property Corporation. If LCRC had no such authority, the provisions of the Property Corporation are void. See Blankespoor, supra at 352 (<HOLDING>). Our determination whether LCRC had such

A: holding that section 13c agreements do not override conflicting provisions of state law
B: holding that once a local church submits itself to the authority of a hierarchical denomination provisions of the denominations constitution override inconsistent provisions in a local churchs articles of association
C: recognizing that provisions of the colorado constitution should be construed in the context of the constitution as a whole
D: holding that the hearing provisions of the ina supersede the provisions of the apa
B.