With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the Conch Republic. Although Sterling did not specifically claim to be an official “duly accredited ... to the United States,” his presentation of this credential supported such an inference. See Callaway, 446 F.2d at 754 (“[A]ny misrepresentation designed to obtain something of value implies the representation that the status, which would produce the thing of value sought, exists in the person making the misrepresentation.”). Furthermore, the card stated that, based on his status as a diplomat, Sterling was “officially immune from traffic infractions, detention, arrest, or civil and criminal prosecution.” Officer Preston testified that this notice led him to give Sterling a warning rather than a speeding ticket. See United States v. Rippee, 961 F.2d 677, 679 (7th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). Based on this evidence, a reasonable jury

A: recognizing this presumption
B: recognizing this as the general rule
C: holding determination of property value in case to decide if assessed value was excessive is not a liquidated demand where only evidence of property value was the conclusory allegation of value in plaintiffs unsworn petition
D: recognizing this type of forbearance from prosecution as something of value
D.