With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Appellants William Daane, Tere Daane, Glenn Trent, Richard Miller, and John Arn appeal their convictions for roperly admitted the spreadsheet and offshore documents into evidence, as there was sufficient proof that these documents were made by the party or a conspirator. See United States v. Arteaga, 117 F.3d 388, 395 n. 10 (9th Cir.1997); see also United States v. Schmit, 881 F.2d 608, 613 (9th Cir.1989). No conclusive proof that appellants viewed or possessed the spreadsheets was required. See Schmit, 881 F.2d at 613. 7. The distr demonstrated a direct or indirect de minimis effect on interstate commerce as required for a Hobbs Act conviction. See United States v. Lynch, 437 F.3d 902, 909 (9th Cir.2006) (en banc) (<HOLDING>) (citation and internal quotation marks

A: holding after lopez that the interstate nexus element of the hobbs act still requires the government to show only a minimal connection to interstate commerce
B: recognizing that  the interstate nexus requirement is satisfied by proof of a probable or potential impact on interstate commerce
C: holding that commerce clause authorizes congress to punish any particular criminal action even without proof of a relation to interstate commerce when the activity is part of a class of activities determined by congress to affect interstate commerce
D: holding that the government can satisfy the hobbs act interstate commerce requirement by showing that the robbery resulted in the closure of a business engaged in interstate commerce
B.