With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 474, 101 A. at 105. When the plaintiff in Gag-non was struck she felt pain in her back and side and said that she “felt the child pushing toward the right.” Id. at 475, 101 A. at 105. She further testified at trial that from the time of the accident until the birth she was worried that the child would be born deformed — a worry that later proved to be founded. Id. This Court held that the “foetus is a part of the person of a pregnant woman, and if, by reason of the nature and circumstances of an injury to her person caused by the negligence of a defendant, she suffers appre hension and anxiety as to the effect of the injury upon the foetus, * * * such mental suffering becomes an element of her damages as a natural and proximate result of the negligence which caused the injury.” 943) (<HOLDING>); Rosen v. Yellow Cab Co., 162 Pa.Super. 58, 56

A: holding that a plaintiff who pled in her complaint that her law firm actively misled her in support of her request for application of the discovery rule had sufficiently pled the application of the doctrine
B: holding that the mother was permitted to recover damages for mental anguish because of the reasonable probability that the defendants negligent act of severely injuring her would cause her to produce an abnormal child
C: holding that a pregnant woman whose baby died just before being born as a direct result of defendantdoctors negligence was permitted to recover damages for her apprehension about the childs wellbeing before death after she learned that the baby was in a transverse position across the upper part of the birth canal and defendant did not undertake any steps to correct the position until after the baby had died
D: holding that a woman who was six months pregnant at the time of the accident was permitted to recover damages for her apprehension that her child may be born dead or deformed as a result of striking her abdomen against the steering wheel in the accident
D.