With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". evaluation. While the amount respondent would receive and the appropriate evaluation criteria remained questions of fact, respondent’s right to the undetermined amount' vested as of July 1, 2002, the day after the expiration of the 2001- contract. Therefore, respondent’s 2001-2002 bonus was owing prior to his termination. As president of the company, respondent’s services contributed to appellant’s profitability, and appellant received the benefit of respondent’s work product. The record reflects that, in this instance, respondent’s bonus was nondiscretionary and actually earned at the time of his discharge. We note that other jurisdictions interpreting similar statutory language have reached the same conclusion. See Rohr v. Ted Neiters Motor Co., 758 P.2d 186, 188 (Colo.Ct.App.1988) (<HOLDING>); Cap Gemini Am., Inc. v. Judd, 597 N.E.2d

A: holding under indiana law that profits are not wages and neither is a fraction of profits wages and so a bonus that is based on the performance of a plant rather than on the time or determinable output of the employee is not wages either
B: holding that the computation of an incentive bonus based on work done was a wage reasoning that wages include not only periodic monetary earnings but also the other benefits to which he is entitled as part of his compensation
C: holding that a bonus calculated based on a percentage of the companys profits was a wage under colorados wagepenalty statute because the bonus was vested and determinable as of the date of termination was disproportionately large in comparison to the employees salary and was owed as compensation for services performed by the employee
D: holding that a former employee was not entitled to recover a yearend bonus from his former employer where no definite sum of money or percentage of profits was promised and where the employee left the company before the end of the fiscal year in question
C.