With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". *** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 . The omitted transcript is part of Clark’s Further Supplemental Excerpts of Record. As to the omitted transcript, we GRANT Appellee’s Motion to Further Supplement the Record (ECF No. 63) and DENY Appellant’s Motion to Strike Further Supplemental Excerpts of Record (ECF No. 68). See Fed. R. App. P. 10(e)(2)(C). As to other documents in the Further Supplemental Excerpts of Record not discussed herein, we DENY AS MOOT both motions. 2 . Kempton stated in her opening brief before the BAP that her nondischargeability complaint alleged concealment of a garage access easement. See Mullis v. U.S. Bankr. Court for Dist. of Nevada, 828 F.2d 1385, 1388 n.9 (9th Cir. 1987) (<HOLDING>). 3 . We take judicial notice of this state

A: holding that the existence and content of a police report are not properly the subject of judicial notice
B: recognizing that pleadings in the underlying case are subject to judicial notice by an appellate court
C: holding that as a general rule pleadings filed in this court are public records and are not subject to being sealed
D: holding that another courts decision is a proper subject of judicial notice
B.