With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the scope of the conflict). However, this issue may be relevant to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, which we do not reach. 2 . Section 90.403 provides in relevant part: "Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.” 3 . Czubak, 570 So.2d at 929 (concluding that the photographs of the victim’s body had little or no relevance because they could not establish identity, were not probative as to the cause of death, and bore little relevance to the circumstances surrounding the murder, and that any relevance was outweighed by the shocking and inflammatory nature of the photographs); Williams, 834 So.2d at 926 (<HOLDING>); Kirby, 625 So.2d at 53-54 (holding that the

A: holding autopsy photograph of victim was admissible even if defendant stipulated identity of victim
B: holding photograph showing victim with his family photograph fell within the prosecutors latitude in showing victim and was not unduly prejudicial
C: holding that a photograph of the hands of the murder victim tied behind her back was properly admitted because it showed the considerable pain inflicted upon the victim by the defendant
D: holding that because the photograph of the victim was for identification purposes only and the victims military service was never discussed at trial even if the photograph did evoke sympathy from the jury it was not reversible error to admit it
D.