With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". as a result of the searches. See id. at 586. Similarly, the plaintiffs claim was dismissed under § 1997e(e) in Harden-Bey v. Rutter, 524 F.3d 789, 795 (6th Cir.2008), for failure to state a claim, where the plaintiff did not allege that his administrative segregation resulted in any physical injury. Although Jackson repeatedly asserts that his larger “action” contains allegations of a dental injury, and implies that this meets the injury requirement, our precedent demonstrates that, absent injury related to the strip search, his Eighth Amendment claim is not cognizable under § 1997e(e). Concerning Jackson’s Fourth Amendment strip-search claim, the district court properly found the search to be constitutional under Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 558, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979) (<HOLDING>). ’ Defendants acknowledge that all inmates

A: holding that pretrial detainees can bring substantive due process claim
B: holding that routine strip searches of pretrial detainees and convicted prisoners conducted after contact visits were constitutional
C: holding that policy requiring strip searches of prisoners prior to transfer did not violate fourth amendment
D: holding that routine monitoring and recording of the calls of convicted prisoners does not violate the prisoners fourth amendment rights
B.