With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". courts, in turn, exercise the powers delegated to them by the district courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157. Under § 157, a bankruptcy court’s authority to enter a final order or judgment depends on whether a case is categorized as a core proceeding or non-core proceeding. See § 157(b)-(c). Bankruptcy courts have authority to enter final orders and judgments in “core proceedings arising under [Tjitle 11, or arising in a case under [Tjitle 11.” § 157(b)(1). Bankruptcy courts may also hear non-core proceedings that are “otherwise related to a case under [Tjitle 11,” but they may not enter final orders in these related non-core cases unless all parties consent. See § 157(c)(1). See also Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1932, 1941-42, 191 L.Ed.2d 911 (2015) (<HOLDING>) (citation and internal quotation marks

A: holding that the bankruptcy courts jurisdiction to adjudicate common law claims violated article iii without deciding the claims
B: holding that a proceeding that by its nature could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case is a core matter subject to the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court
C: holding that under article iii litigants may validly consent to adjudication by bankruptcy courts over claims governed by stern v marshall 564 us 462 503 131 sct 2594 180 led2d 475 2011ie claimsj designated for final adjudication in the bankruptcy court as a statutory matter but prohibited from proceeding in that way as a constitutional matter
D: holding that in a noncore proceeding a bankruptcy court may enter final orders with the consent of all the parties to the proceeding
C.