With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". stop of the Contour was to confirm the identities of the men in the car, to investigate the contents of the bag Defendant had carried, and to attempt to obtain consent to search Defendant’s residence. Those objectives were achieved in an expeditious manner. Once Defendant gave oral consent to search his house, it was reasonable to transport him to that location so that he could sign a written consent form and be present for the search. Approximately twenty (20) minutes elapsed from the time that the Contour was stopped to the signing of the consent form. The officer’s removal of the occupants from the vehicle at gunpoint and his request that they get on their knees did not exceed the scope of the detention. See Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408, 117 S.Ct. 882, 886, 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997) (<HOLDING>); Campbell, 178 F.3d at 349 (stating that

A: holding that the officer had reasonable belief that the occupants of the vehicle were armed where the officer knew that drug dealers are frequently armed and therefore frisk of the vehicle was permissible
B: holding that an officer may order a passenger out of a vehicle during a stop for a traffic infraction
C: holding that it is permissible for an officer to order the occupants out of a vehicle during a lawful stop
D: holding that an officer may search a suspects vehicle incident to a lawful arrest
C.