With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". sentencing. Either way, the profits were properly a part of the bankruptcy estate which were concealed from the Bankruptcy Court each time Brennan filed a monthly report to the Bankruptcy Court from August 1995 until June of 1997, when the total amount concealed from the bankruptcy trustee stood at $22 million. Because the concealment for which Brennan was formally indicted was still ongoing in 1997, and the original concealment ) requires that “where a defendant alleges any factual inaccuracy in the presentence report, the Court must make: (1) a finding as to the allegation, or (2) a determination that no such finding is necessary because the matter controverted will not be taken into account in sentencing”); see also United States v. Parrott, 148 F.3d 629, 633 (6th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). While both Bond and David Donnelly, Val-met’s

A: holding that a district court satisfies its obligation to make factual findings when it explicitly adopts the factual findings set forth in the presentence report
B: holding that former fedrcrimp 32c prohibits a court faced with a disputed fact in the sentencing report from adopting it without making a factual finding of its own
C: holding that by adopting the presentence report the district court made the requisite finding under the guidelines
D: holding that sentencing court satisfies rule 32c where it adequately states and explains the disputed issue in the case
B.