With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 872, 880 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.1997). 51 . Id. 52 . Id. See also Chase Manhattan Bank. N.A. v. Ford (In re Ford), 186 B.R. 312, 317 n. 6 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1995). 53 . See, e.g., First Nat’l Bank of Mobile v. Roddenberry (In re Roddenberry), 701 F.2d 927, 932-33 (11th Cir.1983). 54 . Chevy Chase Bank, FSB (In re Briese), 196 B.R. 440, 450 (Bankr.W.D.Wis.1996) 55 . Citibank South Dakota N.A. v. Dougherty (In re Dougherty), 84 B.R. 653, 657 (9th Cir. BAP 1988). See. also In re Van Horne, 823 F.2d 1285, 1287 (8th Cir.1987). 56 . Dougherty, at 657; Sears, Roebuck, and Co. v. Faulk (In re Faulk), 69 B.R. 743, 757 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.1986); Chase Manhattan Bank v. Carpenter (In re Carpenter), 53 B.R. 724, 730 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1985). 57 . Field v. Mans, - U.S. -, -, 116 S.Ct. 437, 444, 133 L.Ed.2d 351 (1995) (<HOLDING>). 58 . Deb. Ex. I. 59 . Id. 60 . Id. 61 . Pi.

A: holding that the creditor must prove the elements of actual fraud
B: holding clear and convincing standard to prove fraud or fraudulent intent and preponderance of the evidence to prove other elements under  727
C: holding that creditor did not have actual knowledge of the bankruptcy filing where the debtor informed creditor of the possibility that a bankruptcy case would be filed
D: holding that a creditor objecting to the dischargeability of a debt under  523a must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence
A.