With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Inc., 384 So.2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 1980) ("[W]here the term of employment is discretionary with either party or indefinite, then either party for any reason may terminate it at any time and no action may be maintained for breach of the employment contract.”) (quoting DeMarco v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 360 So.2d 134, 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)). 7 . See, e.g., Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass’n v. Florida Div. of Admin. Hearings, 686 So.2d 1349, 1354 (Fla. 1997). 8 . See Blumetti v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 675 So.2d 689, 690 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) ("[T]he employer in such cases must establish ... that the former employee's tardiness was in excusable ....”) (emphasis added). 9 . See Blumetti v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 675 So.2d 689 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (<HOLDING>). 10 . See generally § 443.021, Fla. Slat.

A: holding that this line of cases was not on point and that no error was apparent on the face of the record due to lack of reporters record from defaultjudgment hearing because the judgment reflected that it was based only on the pleadings and affidavits that were in the record
B: holding that disqualification cannot be based on blumettis prior record of misconduct if the precipitating act was excusable
C: holding that supervisory liability under  1983 must be based on active unconstitutional behavior and cannot be based upon a mere failure to act internal quotation marks omitted
D: holding that error in taking judicial notice of a prior ease was harmless where the entire record of the prior case although not introduced into evidence was made part of the record on appeal and no prejudice was shown
B.