With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". federal Evidence § 803.11[7][a] (2d. ed.1999). Furthermore, the official comment to M.R.E. 803(6) provides that the rule “specifically includes diagnoses and opinions as proper subjects of admissible entries.... ” ¶ 17. It is undisputed that Dr. Lindsey had first-hand knowledge of the contents of the letter, as he was Ireland’s treating physician. Moreover, he was acting in the course and scope of his business as a physician in preparing a letter discussing the diagnosis and treatment of his patient. This kind of correspondence may be regularly kept in the course of a physician’s business. Higgins v. Martin Marietta Corp., 752 F.2d 492, 497 (10th Cir.1985). ¶ 18. Other jurisdictions have found that a physician’s letter falls within the ambit of Rule 803(6). Higgins, .S.2d 658 (1992) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 19. Finally, we note that Gilbert’s

A: recognizing physician assistant as agent of the supervising physician
B: holding that an employers awareness of plaintiffs past medical problems does not establish that it regarded her as disabled
C: holding letter from plaintiffs father a physician to plaintiffs psychiatrist describing her emotional problems was properly admitted as a business record
D: holding employer justified in relying upon plaintiffs physician
C.