With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". S.E.2d 161, 164 (1994) (whether a payment is spousal support and maintenance or a property distribution is determined by the function that payment is intended to serve). See also In re Zuccarell, 181 B.R. 42, 44-45 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1995) (recognizing that, typically, a property division is not affected by a change in the personal circumstances of the recipient spouse); In re Ackley, 186 B.R. 1005, 1010 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1994) (noting that the structure of a provision — whether payment is lump sum or periodic, method of payment, terms of payment, amount of payment, whether payment is modifiable, and whether payment is subject to contingencies — is an important element in determining whether the provision is one for support or a property division); In re Edwards, 162 B.R. 83, 85 (D.Conn.1993) (<HOLDING>); In re Jensen, 17 B.R. 537, 540

A: holding that a spouse is not necessarily an agent of the debtor
B: holding that payments in the nature of support need not be made directly to the spouse or dependent to be nondischargeable
C: holding that an obligation is in the nature of alimony when it is intended to provide support for the spouse rather than an equalization of property rights
D: holding that property transferred by a spouse to avoid support obligation may be considered on the issue of property distribution as well as alimony
C.