With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in the district courts, which have concluded uniformly that a fíne does not stem from a consensual transaction and thus is not a debt under the FDCPA. See Reid v. Am. Traffic Solutions, Inc., Nos. 10-ev-204-JPG-DGW & 10-cv-269-JPG, 2010 WL 5289108, at *4-5 (S.D.Ill. Dec. 20, 2010) (concluding that fines for traffic violations are not debts under FDCPA); Mills v. City of Springfield, Mo., No. 2:10-CV-04036-NKL, 2010 WL 3526208, at *15-16 (W.D.Mo. Sept. 3, 2010) (same); Durso v. Summer Brook Preserve Homeowners Ass’n, 641 F.Supp.2d 1256, 1264-65 (M.D.Fla.2008) (concluding that fines assessed against homeowner by homeowners association did not create debts under FDCPA); Shannon v. ACS State & Local Solutions, Inc., No. 08-594(DSD/SRN), 2008 WL 2277814, at *1 (D.Minn. May 30, 2008) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. Redflex Traffic Sys., Inc., No.

A: holding that fines levied by county for parking violation and failure to register vehicle did not meet criteria for fdcpa debts
B: holding that even though statute did not provide for attorneys fees against county its failure to object constituted waiver
C: holding that a conviction under the registration clause is not properly distinguishable from a conviction for failure to register for purposes of fifth amendment analysis
D: holding that a mere parking violation justified the investigatory stop of choudrys vehicle
A.