With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (“Such balancing, however, is not required in the present case because of a jurisdictional limitation that is applicable in this case. Such limitation arises under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(5)....”). The exclusion of personal injury tort claims from the purview of the bankruptcy court stems from Congressional recognition that such claimants stand in a different relationship with the bankruptcy debtor because they did not voluntarily enter into dealings with the debtor. Adams, 1996 WL 228567, *3. The purpose of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(5) is to prevent bankruptcy courts from trying personal injury tort actions. In the Matter of Poole Funeral Chapel, Inc., 63 B.R. 527, 532 (Bankr.N.D.Ala.1986). The term “personal injury tort claim” is not expressly defined in Title 28 or Tit 18 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1988) (<HOLDING>) with Cohen, 107 B.R. at 455 (holding that

A: holding that a civil rights deprivation is a personal injury tort
B: holding that racial discrimination is a personal injury tort
C: holding that racial discrimination is not a personal injury tort
D: holding that sexual harassment is a personal injury tort
A.