With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 63 . Id., at pp. 81-82. 64 . Id., atp. 88. 65 . See note 16, supra, and accompanying text. 66 . FEH Transcript, testimony of Dr. Shelia Bailey, atp. 101. 67 . Id., atpp. 102-03. 68 . Id., at p. 103. 69 . Id., at p. 104. 70 . Id., atp. 105. 71 . Id., atpp. 105-06. 72 . Id., at p. 107. 73 . Id., atp. 107. 74 . Id., atpp. 108-09, 114, 126. 75 . Id., atpp. 108-09, 126. 76 . Id., atp. 109. 77 . Id., atp. 109. 78 . Id., atp. 110. 79 . Id., atpp. 115-16. 80 . Id., atpp. 124-25. 81 . Id., atp. 134. 82 . Id., at p. 134. 83 . Id., atp. 137. 84 . FEH Transcript, testimony of Dr. Mary Alice Conroy, atp. 138. 85 . Id., atp. 139. 86 . Id., atp. 143. 87 . Id., atp. 143. 88 . Id., atp. 144. 89 . Report of Dr. Michael A. Ro 2 L.Ed.2d 860 (1995); Meraz v. State, 785 S.W.2d 146, 150 (Tex.Crim.App.1990)(<HOLDING>). The Texas Penal Code provides in pertinent

A: holding at trial a criminal defendant has the burden to prove his insanity by a preponderance of the evidence
B: holding hrs  7044114 which places the burden on the insanity acquittee to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she is fit to be released does not violate due process principles
C: holding the plaintiff satisfies the burden of a prima facie case by a preponderance of the evidence
D: holding sections 801 and 204 of the texas penal code work together to impose the burden on the defendant to prove insanity by a preponderance of the evidence
D.