With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court to reverse a criminal conviction obtained in an otherwise fair proceeding.” United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 11, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). We “must consider the probable effect the prosecutor’s [comments] would have on the jury’s ability to judge the evidence fairly,” “within the context of the trial.” Id. at 12, 105 S.Ct. 1038. a. Barragan, Franco, and Gutierrez An “important factor contributing to the prejudicial effect of improper statements is the strength of the case against a defendant.” Sanchez, 659 F.3d at 1260 (quoting Weather spoon, 410 F.3d at 1151). The evidence against Barragan, Franco, and Gutierrez was overwhelming, and they do not argue otherwise. Thus, we conclude that the prosecutor’s remarks did not prejudice them. See Nobari, 574 F.3d at 1082 (<HOLDING>). b. Fernandez The evidence against Fernandez

A: holding that while the prosecutors question was improper in light of the overwhelming evidence there was no reversible error in the denial of defendants motion for mistrial
B: holding that the admission of a family photo was harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence in support of the conviction
C: holding that prosecutors remarks were harmless in light of overwhelming evidence against defendants
D: holding the error harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt
C.