With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that suits based on state common law are included for purposes of preemption analysis). Delta also argues that Plaintiffs’ amended complaint presents essentially the same preemption issues as the breach-of-contract claim the Court already dismissed. Def.’s Br. at 1, 7. According to Delta, since the ADA preempted Plaintiffs’ state-law contract claim because it required examination of EU 261, Plaintiffs EU 261 claim should be similarly preempted because the same underlying law is involved. Id. at 1. In support of its .argument, Delta cites several cases where, courts have held that a breach-of-contract claim was preempted when the resolution of the claim would have required interpreting foreign law. Id. at 6 (citing Onoh v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 613 F.3d 596, 600-01 (5th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>); Sanchez v. Aerovias De Mexico, S.A. De C.V.,

A: holding misrepresentation claim to be preempted
B: holding segregation was necessary because breachofcontract claim required proof of different elements than other claims
C: holding breachofcontract claim was preempted
D: holding breachofcontract claim preempted because the plaintiff tried to enlarge the federal rights that were incorporated into the contract
C.