With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". as to municipal liability. See Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). The district court properly dismissed Orr’s claim regarding the defective shower slippers because Orr alleged in his amended complaint that he did not exhaust available grievance procedures. Cf. Wyatt v. Terhune, 280 F.3d 1238, 1246 (9th Cir. 2002) (<HOLDING>). The district court properly dismissed without

A: holding that exhaustion is an affirmative defense where the face of the complaint and exhibits thereto do not establish a failure to exhaust
B: holding that complaint need not anticipate statute of limitations which is an affirmative defense
C: holding that failure to plead affirmative defense to original complaint does not amount to waiver where defense is raised in response to amended complaint
D: recognizing lack of consideration as an affirmative defense to a release that is valid on its face
A.