With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". enforcement officers, investigating a defendant father for alleged sex offenses committed against his daughter, intentionally misinformed the defendant that his daughter was pregnant. Id. at 113, 572 S.E.2d at 167. After determining that “[t]he use of false statements and trickery by police officers during interrogations is not illegal as a matter of law[,]” our Court turned to other factors to determine the admissibility of the defendant’s statement. Id. at 114, 572 S.E.2d at 167. Our Court found that: (1) the interrogation tactics employed “did not implant fear of physical violence or hope of better treatment;” (2) the defendant “was not tricked about the nature of the crime involved or possible punishment;” (3) the officer “did not subject defendant to threats of h 00, 609 (1994) (<HOLDING>). BRYANT, Judge. I concur in the result reached

A: holding that qualified immunity applies if either a the defendants action did not violate clearly established law or b it was objectively reasonable for the defendant to believe that his action did not violate such law internal quotation marks omitted
B: holding that agents promise to inform prosecutor of defendants cooperation does not render a subsequent confession involuntary
C: holding that implicit threats or promises did not render a defendants statement involuntary when a review of the circumstances reveals that the defendants independent will was not overcome so as to induce a confession that he was not otherwise disposed to malee internal quotation marks omitted
D: holding that in order to prevail under  1983 a plaintiff must show 1 that defendants deprived him or her of a right secured by the constitution or laws of the united states and 2 that in doing so defendants acted under color of state law internal quotation marks omitted
C.