With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". District of Nevada, "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion.” Local Rule 7-2(d). 2 . "The failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion.” Local Rule 7 — 2(d). 3 . In comparison, in a case where the officer’s force was not found to be unreasonable, the Court noted that “ “ ‘on the intrusion of his Fourth Amendment Rights’ ” side of the scale, [the plaintiff] does not allege anything more violent than hard pulling and twisting”. Johnson v. County of Los Angeles, 340 F.3d 787, 792 (9th Cir.2003). 4 . See also Michenfelder v. City of Torrance, 28 Cal.App.3d 202, 104 Cal.Rptr. 501 (1972) (<HOLDING>). The Michenfelder court also criticizes the

A: holding that the decision of a police officer to preserve public safety and order through use of commands backed by threat of force or actual use of physical force is a matter of discretion
B: holding that expert testimony on what constitutes deadly physical force and whether the use of force was justified should have been excluded
C: holding force to be an element of pre1994 amendment  111 which may be satisfied by proof of force or threat of force
D: holding that  2241a1 requires actual use of force meaning use of such physical force as is sufficient to overcome restrain or injure a person
A.