With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". action.”); see also Albert v. Wesley Health Services, 2001 WL 503241, *2, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6119, *6-8 (D.Kan.2001). 3 . 422 U.S. 405, 421, 95 S.Ct. 2362, 45 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975). 4 . See Hillman v. United States Postal Service, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 363, *5 (D.Kan.2002), citing Sanchez v. Philip Morris Inc., 774 F.Supp. 626, 629 (W.D.Okla.1991). 5 . See Acrey v. American Sheep Inds. Ass’n, 981 F.2d 1569, 1576 (10th Cir.1992). 6 . See Wulf v. City of Wichita, 883 F.2d 842, 871 (10th Cir.1989). 7 . See Godinet v. Management & Training Corp., 56 Fed.Appx. 865 (10th Cir.2003). 8 . See Plaintiffs Trial Exhibit No. 6. 9 . See Estate of Pitre v. Western Electric Co., 975 F.2d 700, 704 (10th Cir.1992), see also Whatley, 707 F.2d at 1138; Sears v. Bennett, 645 F.2d 1365, 1378 (10th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>). 10 . See Rahn v. Junction City Foundry, Inc.,

A: holding that trial court has wide discretion in determining sufficiency of foundation for opinion testimony
B: holding that trial justice has wide discretion to determine relevancy of evidence
C: holding that the court has wide discretion in fashioning remedies to make victims of discrimination whole
D: holding that a district court has wide discretion to modify an injunction based on changed circumstances or new facts
C.