With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the Pennsylvania consumer protection laws are preempted, we must look to the ordinary meaning of the term(s) and consider the then existing federal common law definitions. See, e.g., FMC Corp. v. Holliday, 498 U.S. 52, 111 S.Ct. 403, 112 L.Ed.2d 356 (1990); Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37, 100 S.Ct. 311, 62 L.Ed.2d 199 (1979); Burns v. Alcala, 420 U.S. 575, 95 S.Ct. 1180, 43 L.Ed.2d 469 (1975). “[Wjhere words are employed in a statute which had at the time a well-known meaning at common law or in the law of this country[,] they are presumed to have been used in that sense unless the context compels to the contrary.” Lorillard v. Pons, 434 U.S. 575, 583, 98 S.Ct. 866, 871, 55 L.Ed.2d 40 (1978); see also Evans v. First Nat’l Bank, 251 U.S. 108, 40 S.Ct. 58, 64 L.Ed. 171 (1919) (<HOLDING>). “Interest rate” is defined as “[t]he

A: holding that federal law defines fiduciary capacity and fraud or defalcation
B: holding that the plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by federal law
C: holding that federal law completely defines what constitutes the taking of usury by a national bank referring to state law only to determine the maximum permitted rate
D: holding that with respect to the eaja the local or national market rate for legal services cannot be a special factor used to increase the rate beyond the statutory rate
C.