With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). However, we have “applied a more relaxed standard for finding a waiver of venue rights than for finding waiver of other constitutional rights in criminal trials.” Miller, 111 F.3d at 750. Indeed, a defendant may “waive venue rights by his inaction.” Id.-, 2 Wright, supra, § 306, at 343 (“The courts [] have also found a waiver of venue from the inaction of defendant. The absence of an objection to venue, or a motion specifically raising the defect, has been held to constitute a waiver.”). “[A] party that has waived a right is not entitled to appellate relief.” United States v. Teague, 443 F.3d 1310, 1314 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 247, 166 L.Ed.2d 194 (2006); see also United States v. Carrasco-Solazar, 494 F.3d 1270, 1273 (10th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>). A defendant can waive improper venue when it

A: holding that an appellate court cannot consider an issue that was not preserved for appellate review
B: holding that lack of complete record precluded appellate review of alleged incurable jury argument
C: holding where challenge was waived that appellate review is precluded
D: holding that appellate review is precluded when the error is invited
C.