With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of his application to UNC, he would receive in-state residency status for tuition purposes. The Ort letter re-emphasized that “your athletic scholarship may be immediately reduced or cancelled if you fail to meet UNC, ACC, or NCAA continuing eligibility requirements; become ineligible to participate in your sport;... or engage in misconduct warranting disciplinary penalty.” Ort renewed Plaintiff’s scholarship on 19 June 2009 and 30 June 2010 using similar form letters. i. No Breach of ASA Plaintiff has not alleged UNC or Thorp breached the terms of the ASA. In North Carolina, a plaintiff must allege injury to a contractual interest to have standing to maintain a contract-based claim. See Beachcomber Props., L.L.C. v. Station One, Inc., 169 N.C. App. 820, 824, 611 S.E.2d 191, 194 (2005) (<HOLDING>). In the present case, Plaintiff has alleged no

A: holding that plaintiff had no standing because he had no intention of seeking further medical advice or treatment from defendant
B: holding that a plaintiff had no injury in fact and consequently no standing when it had no enforceable contract right against the defendant
C: holding that because a violation of a statute had no practical effect there was no concrete injury
D: holding that nonsignatories to a contract have no rights under the contract and thus no standing to assert claims under the contract
B.