With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". took place: [Appellant]: I — I couldn’t believe what was going on. At that point he was a mugger. I’m not going to sign anything from a mugger, somebody who has assaulted me, not once, not twice, but three times; and the third time — you’ve seen the pictures. You’ve seen what I’ve gone through. That’s in evidence. [Prosecutor]: Your Honor, my objection is that the defendant waived his right to testify. This is not a proper time for him to testify. [The court]: Overrule— [Appellant]: I’m just reviewing the evidence for the jury. I’m sorry? [The court]: Overrule the objection. You may proceed. [Appellant]: Thank you. Appellant did not object at trial to the prosecutor’s statement. As such, nothing is preserved for our review. See Johnson v. State, 629 S.W.2d 953, 954 (Tex.Crim.App.1982) (<HOLDING>). We overrule point of error one. LEGAL AND

A: holding the prosecutors statements were not an inappropriate comment on the defendants failure to testify but rather a comment on the defendants failure to present convincing evidence to support his defense
B: holding that failure to object to prosecutors comment on defendants failure to testify preserved nothing for appellate review
C: recognizing that the fifth amendment forbids comment by the prosecution on a defendants failure to testify
D: holding that prosecutors comment on defendants failure to testify constituted plain error affecting the defendants substantial rights
B.