With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". recover damages or funds from the State treasury. Ex parte Alabama Dep’t of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, 937 So.2d 1018, 1023 (Ala.2006) (“Sovereign immunity bars claims against State agencies on the rationale that a damages award against a State agency would result in a monetary loss to the State treasury.”); Lyons, 858 So.2d at 262 (noting that a party could not bring an action against a State official, because “[s]uch an action impermissibly seeks funds from the State treasury”); Armory Comm’n of Alabama v. Staudt, 388 So.2d 991, 993-94 (Ala.1980) (stating that an action against the Armory Commission of Alabama was barred by § 14 because a judgment against it “would adversely affect the state treasury”); Southall v. Stricos Corp., 275 Ala. 156, 158, 153 So.2d 234, 235 (1963) (<HOLDING>); and Moody v. University of Alabama, 405 So.2d

A: holding that  14 prevents the state from being sued and a suit against the state  cannot be indirectly accomplished by suing its officers or agents in their official capacity when a result favorable to plaintiff would be directly to affect the financial status of the state treasury quoting state docks commn v barnes 225 ala 403 405 143 so 581 582 1932
B: holding that  14 prevents an action against the state when a result favorable to the plaintiff would directly affect a contract or property right of the state
C: holding that an action against an officer was not an action against the state because the relief sought would not take away any property of the state or fasten a lien on it or interfere with the disposition of funds in the treasury
D: holding that a declaratoryjudgment action against the state that would affect property in which the state had an interest was barred by  14
B.