With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to meet his burden of bringing up a proper record and, therefore, dismiss his appeal. Appeal dismissed. Glaze, J., would remand with directions to dismiss. 1 As of April 6,2006, L.B. had been living outside of the home for twelve months. 2 After reviewing the record before us, it appears that the circuit court assumed it was operating under the old rules at the hearing on June 15,2006; however, the final order was filed on July 13,2006, and the record on appeal was lodged September 25,2006. Therefore, the new court rules regarding dependency-neglect cases, which were adopted on July 1,2006, apply to the instant appeal. See In Re: Adoption of Rules 6-9 & 6-10 of the Supreme Court & Court of Appeals (Rulesfor Appeals in Dependency-Neglect Cases), 366 Ark. App’x 628 (2006) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). Regardless, our conclusion would be the same

A: holding that the filing of an opening brief within the time period for filing a notice of appeal could constitute notice of appeal
B: holding that tjhese rules are effective july 12006 at which time appeals shall be commenced by filing the notice ofappeal and designation of record form 1 as set out in rule 69
C: holding that evidence in an inadmissible form may be considered at the summary judgment stage as long as the evidence is submitted in an admissible form at trial
D: holding time for filing notice of appeal under rule 8002 is jurisdictional
B.