With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". judge erred when he changed his mind as to the admissibility of the shed statement. She contends she was entitled to rely upon the inadmissibility of this evidence and that the district court violated her due process rights in changing its ruling one week before trial without granting her request for a continuance. The State argues that due process does not prevent a trial court from changing a pretrial ruling on the admissibility of evidence and that a decision to grant or deny a continuance rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, which discretion was not abused in this case. “The Due Process Clause guarantees every defendant the right to a trial comporting with basic tenets of fundamental fairness.” State v. Pearce, 146 Idaho 241, 248, 192 P.3d 1065, 1072 (2008) (<HOLDING>). However, “[a]ny error, defect, irregularity

A: recognizing the purpose of crossexamination is to enlighten the jury as to whether the witness actuallyas a matter of fact knows the general reputation of the defendant and to place the jury in a better position to pass upon the credibility of the witness testimony
B: holding no due process violation where the state took one position regarding the credibility of a witness during the trial against defendant and changed its position in a subsequent trial of another defendant involved in the underlying crime
C: holding that a trial witnesss testimony as to the credibility of another witness was prejudicial error
D: holding that it is improper to ask a witness to comment on the credibility of another witness
B.