With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (Federal Judicial Center 4th ed. 2004) (setting out seven criteria); Shari Seidman Diamond, Reference Guide on Survey Research, in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence ("Diamond on Survey Research”) at 359, 373-418 (Federal Judicial Center 3d ed. 2011) (discussing criteria to be considered to determine the admissibility of and weight to be accorded to survey evidence). 45 . 6 McCarthy on Trademarks § 32:163 at 32-333. 46 . See Troublé v. Wet Seal, 179 F.Supp.2d 291, 308 (S.D.N.Y.2001) ("Although no survey can construct a perfect replica of ‘real world’ buying patterns, a survey must use a stimulus that, at a minimum, tests for confusion by roughly simulating marketplace conditions.”); see also American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co. Ltd., 609 F.2d 655, 660 n. 4 (2d Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>). But cf. Vista Food Exch., Inc. v. Vistar

A: holding that it was not clearly erroneous for the district court to consider survey evidence even though the survey was imperfect
B: holding that district courts rejection of survey offered to show secondary meaning was not clearly erroneous
C: holding district court decision to exclude survey for failure to conduct it under actual marketing conditions not clearly  erroneous
D: holding role enhancement was not clearly erroneous where district court made credibility decision to believe codefendants statements
C.