With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a short vacation to Canada,” Appellee Br. 84. We disagree that bringing a personal collection to the start of a vacation as opposed to leaving it at home supplies an appropriate basis for sentencing a person to an additional 10 years in prison. In addition, though we accept the district court’s observation that Jenkins’s conduct at trial and during sentencing proceedings reflected a “disdain for the law,” we find problematic the district court’s exclusive reliance on this factor as justification for dramatically increasing Jenkins’s sentence. See App. 860-61. While we do not condone Jenkins’s lack of respect for the law, it simply cannot bear the weight the district court assigned to it. Dorvee, 616 F.3d at 183; cf. United States v. Gerezano-Rosales, 692 F.3d 393, 401 (5th Cir. 2012) (<HOLDING>). Jenkins had already paid heavily for his

A: holding that the district courts error in calculating the amount of drugs at issue was harmless because the error had no impact on the defendants sentence
B: holding district courts decision to increase a defendants sentence from 71 to 108 months based on defendants disrespect for the law constituted clear error in judgement in balancing the sentencing factors
C: holding in the ineffectiveassistanceofcounsel context that any increase in a defendants sentence is prejudicial
D: holding that sentencing error is harmless if the error did not affect the district courts selection of the sentence imposed
B.