With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". language approach to interpreting Section 97-36. This Court’s precedent identifies that a modified contract containing the required formation elements is a new contract. See, e.g., NRC Golf Course, LLC v. JMR Golf LLC,_N.C. App._,_, 731 S.E.2d 474, 480 (2012) (“Parties to a contract may agree to change its terms; but the new agreement, to be effective, must contain the elements necessary to the formation of a contract.” (emphasis added)). Like other newly formed contracts, a modified contract may be made in this state. The General Assembly crafted Section 97-36 with a full view that the phrase “employment contract” contemplated both contracts of hire as well as modifications of existing contracts which, by long-standing precedent, are new agreements. See id,.; co (Tex. App. 1983) (<HOLDING>). The Commission held that modification of an

A: holding that the place of performance governs the legality of the contract and because the contract was to be performed in mexico texas public policy against gambling was not implicated
B: holding maryland had jurisdiction where the original contract of hire was formed in texas but a later contract modification was agreed to in maryland
C: holding that for a suit to be brought in the venue in which the contract was to be performed the contract must expressly state where the performance of the contract was to occur
D: holding that louisiana had jurisdiction over a modified contract of employment where the original employment contract was formed in texas but additional consideration for employment was negotiated in louisiana
B.