With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". compel the testimony of a non-judgment debtor third party at a supplemental proceeding. No language in Wis. Stat. § 816.06 grants this right to the judgment creditor. Therefore, to accept Crown Castle's argument, we would have to conclude that even though the statute is silent, it nonetheless confers a right on the judgment creditor to compel testimony from non-judgment debtor third parties. ¶ 25. We cannot interpret the silence of the statute to create a statutory right. Instead, we conclude that § 816.06 does not grant judgment creditors the right to compel the testimony of a non-judgment debtor third party at a supplemental proceeding. This is so because courts are not entitled to grant or expand statutory rights based solely on a statute's silence. See Harvot, 320 Wis. 2d 1, ¶ 50 (<HOLDING>); Relyea, 102 Wis. at 303-04 (holding that

A: recognizing that courts routinely take judicial notice of documents filed in other courts
B: holding that the courts should not undertake ad hoc judicial discovery of implied statutory rights
C: recognizing that courts should exercise judicial restraint in a facial challenge
D: holding order of contempt sentence without statutory opportunity for appeal was in error but nevertheless involved a judicial act subject to judicial immunity
B.