With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to the diversity jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Because federal courts have jurisdiction in this case under the federal question jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the district court erred by applying the domestic relations exception. Nonetheless, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of this case because Plaintiff has not exhausted his tribal court remedies. AFFIRMED. 1 . The record is not entirely clear on the status (Indian or non-Indian) of Defendant Hanson and of Lexie’s maternal grandmother. Determination of those factual questions is unnecessary to the resolution of the issue before us. 2 . Because we have subject matter jurisdiction under § 1331, we need not determine whether an alternative basis for jurisdiction also exists. See Boozer, 381 F.3d at 934 n. 2

A: recognizing that every theory of relief must raise federal issue for claim to arise under federal law
B: recognizing the common enterprise theory of marriage
C: holding that no scholars privilege exists under the first amendment or common law
D: holding that jurisdiction exists under federal common law and declining to address the plaintiffs alternative jurisdictional theory
D.