With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 223, 227-28 (Wyo.1986) (UrbigMt, J., concurring specially, joined by Thomas, C.J., & Brown, J., in separate special concurrence) (“[A]n agency ... may reconsider a decision if the agency has adopted rules ... regarding such reconsideration procedures.”). But see In re Application for Authority to Conduct Savings & Loan Activities, 182 Mont. 361, 597 P.2d 84, 87-88 (1979) (declining to rule on “whether an administrative agency has inherent power to reconsider its decision”); Suryan v. Alaska Indus. Bd., 12 Alaska 571, 573 (1950) (“[A]n administrative body has no power to grant a rehearing or to set aside or modify its decisions except by virtue of express statutory provision or by necessary implication.”); Yamada v. Natural Disaster Claims Comm’n, 54 Haw. 621, 513 P.2d 1001, 1004 (1973) (<HOLDING>); Armijo v. Save ‘N Gain, 108 N.M. 281, 771

A: holding that a statutory basis is necessary for an administrative body to initiate reconsideration of its prior final quasijudicial decisions
B: holding that this courts review of board decisions is limited to final orders or final decisions
C: holding that the judicial privilege does not apply to an allegation concerning a school teacher made by an adult former student before commencement of any quasijudicial proceeding and without an intent that it lead to a quasijudicial proceeding
D: holding that administrative decisions are subject to reconsideration as long as the agency still retains control of the proceeding
A.