With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. DENIED. See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Carter, 680 So.2d 546, 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (<HOLDING>). Cf. Weinstein v. Aisenberg, 758 So.2d 705

A: holding that a petition for writ of certiorari should be dismissed if there has been an insufficient showing of irreparable harm and should be denied when it is determined that an order did not depart from the essential requirements of law
B: holding that discovery of financial information was not in and of itself the type of irreparable harm necessary for certiorari review
C: holding the time trouble and expense of an unnecessary trial is not irreparable harm when determining whether the threshold elements of certiorari jurisdiction have been met
D: holding that the district court erred when it failed to consider the presumption of irreparable harm
C.