With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court that a settlement was made in good faith shall bar any other joint tortfeasor or co-obligor from any further claims against the settling tortfea-sor or co-obligor for equitable comparative contribution, or partial or comparative indemnity, based on comparative negligence' or comparative fault. Haw.Rev.Stat. § 663-11: "Joint tortfeasors” are "two or more persons jointly and severally liable in tort for the same injury to person or property, whether or not judgment has been- recovered against all or some of them.” 3 . See, e.g., Espaniola v. Cawdrey Mars Joint Venture, 68 Haw. 171, 707 P.2d 365 (1985) (finding that a contract allowing for indemnification between contractor and sub-contractor was not barred); AIG Haw. Ins. Co. v. Estate of Caraang, 74 Haw. 620, 851 P.2d 321 (1993) (<HOLDING>); see also, Kamali v. Hawaiian Elec. Co., 54

A: holding that plaintiff could recover medical fees not actually paid by the insurance company pursuant to an insurance contract
B: holding that the mcca was not obligated to indemnify a claim under a california automobile insurance policy that was reformed into a michigan nofault automobile insurance policy five years after the subject accident and stating that the mcca can refuse to indemnify claims paid under mcl 5003163
C: holding that a closing protection letter offering to indemnify a mortgage company was not an insurance contract where although issued by an insurance company there was no distribution of the risk
D: holding that an insurance company had to indemnify defendant driver pursuant to policy because shooting that caused accident was determined to be accidental
D.