With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". supervisors as well as the less able ones. Furthermore, plaintiffs’ argument that this suit is not concerned with the collective bargaining agreement conflicts with the basis on which they have filed their own complaint. See Pis’ Opp. at 12. In the complaint, plaintiffs’ state that the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction arises at least in part from 39 U.S.C. § 1208. See Complaint ¶ 9. That section of the PRA expressly grants jurisdiction to the Court over suits arising from the violations of contracts between the USPS and labor organizations. 39 U.S.C. § 1208. To bring suit under that provision, however, plaintiffs would first have to have exhausted the provisions of their collective bargaining agreement. See Roman v. United States Postal Service, 821 F.2d 382, 384 (7th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). Cf. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight

A: holding that exhaustion of contractual remedies is a prerequisite to claim for relief under 39 usc  1208
B: recognizing that exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not required as a prerequisite to bringing an action pursuant to  1983
C: recognizing that exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not a prerequisite to bringing a  1983 action
D: holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies is a mandatory prerequisite to a lawsuit under foia
A.