With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". She testified that she saw him periodically with cash, but she gave no specifics as to the source, any regular amount, or frequency of such cash. The trial court’s finding as to his income is not supported by the evidence. The yor’s current ability to comply with the order of the court. Garo v. Garo, 347 So.2d 418 (Fla.1977) (contempt finding for nonpayment of alimony depended on specific finding of present ability to pay). But if the court’s command is itself premised only on an ability that might have once existed in the past but has not been shown to exist currently, there is the danger that the coercive powers of the court will be exercised on one who simply lacked the ability to comply with the order when entered. See, e.g., Pompey v. Cochran, 685 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (<HOLDING>). Hence, it is imperative that findings as to

A: holding that father being held in jail based on presumption of ability to comply could not have been incarcerated for civil contempt of child support order after failing to appear at contempt hearing without affirmative finding based on evidence that he had present ability to pay purge amount
B: holding corporation and its president in criminal contempt because previous order of civil contempt had not been purged
C: holding that because civil contempt is only to obtain compliance it must be used only where the contemnor has the present ability to comply with the court order and the trial court specifically finds that the contemnor has that ability
D: holding that an attorney charged with contempt for failing to attend a scheduled hearing could be charged only with indirect not direct contempt because the contempt did not occur in open court and the judge did not have personal knowledge of the reasons for the attorneys nonappearance
A.