With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". name on grounds of hearsay. The district court overruled that objection, and Juarez-Gomez does not challenge the district court’s evidentiary rulings on appeal. Moreover, A.G. was repeatedly referred to as Juarez-Gomez’s son, or as "Junior,” at trial with no objection from Juarez-Gomez. (See J.A. 208-10, 211, 279.) 7 . We note the existence of a circuit split on the issue of whether a defendant must take affirmative steps to i abuse its discretion by declining to consider Erasto’s status as a deportable alien as a mitigating factor at sentencing. We also note that Erasto’s argument that his status as a deportable alien is a mitigating factor requiring a lesser sentence has been squarely rejected in other circuits. See United States v. Thavaraja, 740 F.3d 253, 262-63 (2d Cir. 2014) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Morales-Uribe, 470 F.3d

A: recognizing that district court may take into account adverse impact on incarceration caused by status as deportable alien
B: holding that in determining an appropriate sentence under  3553a a district court may  but not must take into account the uncertainties presented by the prospect of removal proceedings
C: holding that the courts statement that the sentence was sufficient and a greater sentence is not necessary did not contradict the requirements of  3553a
D: holding that sentence is reasonable when the district court properly addresses sentencing factors of  3553a
B.