With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the trial court’s order in Case No. A16A2193. Judgment affirmed in Case No. A16A2192. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part in Case No. Al 6A2193. Dillard, P. J., and Bethel, J., concur. 1 The court’s order also granted summary judgment to CML-GA as to the liability of Redcedar’s co-defendants, Georgia Timber, LLC, and its agent, Barry Bedingfield. In addition, the court denied cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Redcedar and Bedingfield. Although Bedingfield initially appealed from the summary judgment order, this Court granted his motion to withdraw the appeal on August 19, 2016. Georgia Timber and CML-GA settled the case after the court entered summary judgment against the former on the issue of liability. Thus, Georgia Timb 93, 896 (5) (553 SE2d 181) (2001) (<HOLDING>); Southern Land & Cattle Co. v. Simmons, 202

A: holding that a person who cut and removed timber pursuant to the direction of the person in possession of the property but without the written consent of the company holding legal title to the land could be held liable under the gtccs
B: holding that a company that cut removed and sold timber from land that secured a debt held by the plaintiff was liable as a matter of law under the gtccs because it had not first obtained the written consent of the plaintiff
C: holding that a person who cut and removed timber from a golf course was liable to the owners of the course as a matter of law under the gtccs regardless how the person subsequently disposed of the timber ie by using selling or discarding it
D: holding that while safety improvements to public golf course were both feasible and highly desirable the citys failure to take such steps did not create a dangerous condition on the golf course for purposes of the cgia
C.