With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of public trust, U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3; and a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility, U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(a), (b). 13 . Because we conclude that Garrison's sentence improperly was enhanced for abuse of a position of public trust and remand for resentencing without this enhancement, we need not address her double-counting issue. 14 . Given Garrison’s sentencing date of October 26, 1995, we use the applicable United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (1994) and statutes and regulations in effect on that date. See United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349, 354 (11th Cir.1994) ("The sentencing court must employ the guidelines in effect at the time the sentencing hearing is held.”). 15 . See Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36, 42-43, 113 S.Ct. 1913, 1917-18, 123 L.Ed.2d 598 (1993) (<HOLDING>). 16 . As examples, our court has determined

A: holding that sentencing guidelines commentary which is interpretive and instructive to application of a guideline is binding on federal courts
B: holding that where the commentary to a guideline is at odds with another provision of the guidelines the guideline prevails
C: holding that commentary accompanying guidelines is binding
D: recognizing the guidelines commentary is authoritative
A.