With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". asserts the order has the effect of granting a new trial and thus falls under section 14-3-330(2) (b). However, in holding an order granting Rule 60(b) relief to set aside a default judgment is not immediately appealable, this court explained such orders “a elief was not immediately appealable, the North Carolina Court of Appeals explained: “The right to avoid one trial on the disputed issues is not normally a substantial right that would allow an interlocutory appeal.” Metcalf v. Palmer, 46 N.C.App. 622, 265 S.E.2d 484, 485 (1980). In applying their statute similar to our section 14-3-830(b), the North Carolina courts have consistently held an order granting Rule 60(b) relief is not immediately appealable. See Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1978) (<HOLDING>); Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 270 S.E.2d

A: holding that an order of consolidation is interlocutory and not immediately appealable
B: holding an order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and not appealable
C: holding order setting aside summary judgment for procedural irregularity was not immediately appealable
D: holding that a summary judgment order determining only a question of evidence sufficiency ie which facts a party may or may not be able to prove at trial is not immediately appealable
C.