With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the evidence that formed the factual basis for the acceptance of his plea. He is correct that the trial judge may not accept a plea without first being satisfied that there is a factual basis for it. CrR 4.2(d); State v. Saas, 118 Wn.2d 37, 43, 820 P.2d 505 (1991). However, evidence beyond a reasonable doubt is not required; the trial judge was merely obligated to find sufficient evidence for a jury to determine Easterlin was armed. Id. ¶[15 In this case, an officer saw a gun on Easterlin’s lap. That is more than sufficient for the trial judge to find a connection between Easterlin and the weapon. f 16 There was also ample evidence from which a trier of fact could find Easterlin was armed to protect the drugs. See State v. Simonson, 91 Wn. App. 874, 883, 960 P.2d 955 (1998) (<HOLDING>). Easterlin’s statement on plea of guilty

A: holding that the purchaser could sustain a 93a claim against the president and vicepresident of a manufacturing company because they took an active role in the dealings with the plaintiff
B: holding that officers premiranda questions concerning active methamphetamine production were within the public safety exception
C: holding that a nexus exists if the weapons were there to protect an active methamphetamine manufacturing operation
D: holding that a nexus between the corporate officers or directors official activity and the matter for which indemnification is sought must be shown though no more than a nexus whether a nexus exists is a question of fact to be determined by the trial court considering all the circumstances surrounding the proposed indemnification
C.