With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". purposes of setting alimony award); Steiner v. Steiner, 788 So 2d 771, 778 (Miss 2001) (same); Holmes v. Holmes, 7 Va App 472, 485, 375 SE2d 387, 395 (1988) (same); Weberg v. Weberg, 158 Wis 2d 540, 544-45,463 NW2d 382, 384 (Ct App 1990) (same); see also Clauson v. Clauson, 831 P2d 1257, 1263 n 9 (Alaska 1992) (stating in dicta that a “state court is clearly free to consider post-divorce disability income and order a disabled veteran to pay spousal support even where disability benefits will be used to make such payments’’); Davis v. Davis, 777 SW2d 230, 232 (Ky 1989) (noting that, although VA disability benefits were not divisible as property, courts could resolve an inequitable property division with a spousal support award); but see Ex parte Billeck, 777 So 2d 105, 109 (Ala 2000) (<HOLDING>). Based on our reading of Mansell — and our

A: holding that alimony obligation was discharged by social security payments received by the wife
B: holding that wife was entitled to prejudgment interest on alimony and child support arrearages from the date those payments were due
C: holding that federal law precludes courts from considering va disability payments in awarding alimony
D: holding military service disability payments are community property
C.