With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 30 months’ imprisonment, with three years’ post-prison supervision, and ordered to pay, among other obligations, $1,144 in court-appointed attorney fees. On appeal, he raises three assignments of error. We write to address only his third assignment, in which he contends that the trial court plainly erred in imposing $1,144 in court-appointed attorney fees without a basis in the record to determine that defendant had the ability to pay them, and we reject the other assignments without discussion. The state concedes that the court committed plain error when it imposed attorney fees in this case, because the record is devoid of evidence that defendant would be able to repay them. We agree and accept the state’s concession. See State v. Coverstone, 260 Or App 714, 716, 320 P3d 670 (2014) (<HOLDING>). Given the amount of attorney fees imposed,

A: holding that it is plain error for a trial court to require a defendant to pay courtappointed attorney fees in the absence of legally sufficient evidence that defendant has the ability to pay the amount imposed
B: holding that imposition of courtappointed attorney fees is plain error when the record is silent as to the defendants ability to pay the fees ordered
C: holding because an award of attorney fees is discretionary court may consider attorney fees in relation to the underlying equities in the case
D: recognizing that an award of temporary attorneys fees and costs is based on an assessment of need and ability to pay as well as the reasonableness of the fees and costs
B.