With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". The decision to depart from the presumptive sentence rests within the trial court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of that discretion. State v. Givens, 544 N.W.2d 774, 776 (Minn.1996). The trial court imposed a sentence of 210 months for the aiding second-degree murder conviction, which represents a 60-month upward departure from the presumptive sentence of 150 months. The trial court cited the concealment of the victim’s body and Leja’s abuse of a position of trust as aggravating factors supporting the departure. Leja argues that concealment of the victim’s body may be used as an aggravating factor only when the defendant uses her knowledge of the location in attempting to bargain with authorities. See State v. Schmit, 329 N.W.2d 56, 58 n. 1 (Minn.1983) (<HOLDING>). But the supreme court since Schmit has

A: recognizing attorneys substantial experience in the practice of law as an aggravating factor
B: holding concealment of body without bargaining attempt was not a proper aggravating factor
C: holding evidence sufficient to support aggravating factor of old age
D: holding that the death of a victim may not be considered an aggravating factor in a homicide sentencing
B.