With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". colloquy: Prosecutor: Did Baby Harris ever tell you what he wanted these machine guns for? Taylor: He said something earlier about that he wanted to do a ride-by, he wanted to show some guys that he wasn’t a punk, that they think he was a punk. (Trial Tr. at 785.) It seems clear to us that the evidence of Harris’s plans to conduct a ride-by shooting not only completes the picture, as the state court concluded, it also provides a motive for shooting Willoughby. We have discussed similar matters in the context of the Federal Rules of Evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Phelps, 168 F.3d 1048, 1057-58 (8th Cir.1999) (finding no abuse of discretion in admitting evidence relating to a defendant’s actions before and after a shooting); United States v. Luna, 94 F.3d 1156, 1162 (8th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>); United States v. White, 645 F.2d 599, 602

A: holding that other bad acts evidence was admissible to explain the governments theory of the case as well as for showing the defendants motive for participating in an armed robbery
B: holding that in a prosecution for possession of an unregistered firearm evidence of an armed robbery committed with the firearm was admissible
C: holding evidence of defendants prior drug use and heroin addiction admissible to establish defendants motive to commit robbery
D: holding other crimes evidence admissible to show motive where motive was put in issue by defense at trial
A.