With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". infra at 28-30. 5 . See Purchase of Service Agreement (R.R. at 64a, 71a). 6 . Moreover, the underlying complaint against COLT alleged direct negligence by COLT for the authority’s role in the events leading up to the January 11, 1988 automobile accident injuring Paula Jo Lehman. The trial court dismissed COLT from the underlying action based solely on the authority's immunity from liability under the facts of the case and the court's interpretation of the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act. Whether a jury would have ultimately found COLT directly negligent in the underlying tort action, thereby precluding Carolina Casualty’s defense, need not be decided here, nor will it absolve Carolina Casualty of its obligation to Lebanon Coach. See Daily Express v. Northern Neck Transfer, supra (<HOLDING>). 7 . In Lehman v. County of Lebanon

A: holding that a lienor under a contract with a lessee is entitled to a lien against the lessors interest only where the lease expressly or impliedly requires the lessee to make improvements to the leased property
B: holding that officers observations of the speed of the truck coupled with the sound of the engine racing and the bouncing of the truck as it passed through the intersection gave officer probable cause to believe that truck was exceeding a speed greater than was reasonable and prudent under the conditions
C: holding that a truck drivers injury from a fall in the shower of a truck stop while off duty was not compensable
D: holding truck lessors liability to truck lessee existed without parties express indemnity clause in lease thus exclusion was inapplicable where carolina casualty alleged its insured truck lessor was precluded from coverage because lessors liability was assumed under contract with truck lessee
D.