With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". falls within the purview of a personal injury tort claim under the expansive view, yet retaining bankruptcy jurisdiction over the claim if it has “earmarks of a financial, business or property tort claim, or a contract claim.” Ice Cream Liquidation, 281 B.R. at 161; Adelson v. Smith (In re Smith), 389 B.R. 902, 908 (Bankr.D.Nev. 2008). The middle ground encompasses torts involving bodily and reputational harm, without including those personal injury torts designated by statute only. Smith, 389 B.R. at 908. The Smith court found this approach the most appealing because “it is closely aligned with what are traditionally thought of as the ‘common law torts;’ and der claim is a personal injury tort claim). But see Mitan v. Davis (In re Davis), 334 B.R. 874, 878 n. 2 (Bankr.W.D.Ky.2005) (<HOLDING>). These defamation claims lack any financial,

A: holding that an embezzlement claim is not a personal injury tort claim
B: holding that a libel claim is not a personal injury tort claim
C: holding that a negligence claim is not a personal injury tort claim
D: holding that a claim for violation of the fair debt collection practices act is not a personal injury tort claim
B.