With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". S.W.3d at 376-77 (recognizing that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice is a state agency subject to the TCHRA’s waiver of immunity); Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice v. Cooke, 149 S.W.3d 700, 704 (Tex.App.-Austin 2004, no pet.) (stating that the TCHRA “provides a limited waiver of sovereign immunity when a governmental unit has committed employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, disability, religion, sex, national origin, or age”) (emphasis added); King v. Tex. Dep’t of Human Servs. ex rel. Bost, 28 S.W.3d 27, 30 (Tex.App.-Austin 2000, no pet.) (recognizing that the TCHRA “contains such a waiver [of sovereign immunity] by including state agencies in the Act’s definition of ‘employer’ ”); Sauls v. Montgomery County, 18 S.W.3d 310, 315 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2000, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). The Beaumont court in Sauls succinctly

A: holding that the sovereign immunity afforded to tribes extends to their governmental organizations and business entities
B: holding that a claim that sovereign immunity has been waived is itself waived if not argued on appeal
C: holding that an act of legislature may be required to waive sovereign immunity
D: holding that the legislature has in clear and unambiguous language waived sovereign immunity against elected public officials and governmental entities defined by the act to be employers
D.