With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". where Board fails to provide adequate statement of reasons or bases, the Court is precluded from effectively reviewing the Board’s adjudication). B. Inadequate Notice With regard to his remaining claims, Mr. Coker seeks remand and argues on appeal that the Secretary failed to provide the notice required by 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a). In supplemental briefing, he asserts that the Secretary “never advised through a VCAA notice letter or otherwise on what evidence would be needed to substantiate any of the aforementioned claims.” Appellant’s Supplemental Brief at 2-3. In this instance, however, the Board found that Mr. Coker had received notice “through the issuance of [Statements of the [C]ase and [Supplemental [Sta , 2005); see also Hernandez v. Starbuck, 69 F.3d 1089, 1093 (10th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); Wilson v. Jotori Dredging, Inc., 999 F.2d

A: holding that error will not be presumed from a silent record and that without the relevant transcript there is insufficient evidence to review the alleged error and the appellant carries the burden of demonstrating the alleged error in the record
B: holding that the appellant who comes to the court of appeals as the challenger of the underlying decision bears the burden of demonstrating the alleged error and the precise relief sought and where the appellant fails to meet this burden the court of appeals is not required to manufacture the appellants argument citing fed rapp p 28a and natl commodity  barter assn v gibbs 886 f2d 1240 1244 10th cir1989
C: holding that in appellate proceedings the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error
D: holding that an appellant bears the burden of demonstrating error on appeal
B.