With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". amendments to sections 440.15(2) and (4), Florida Statutes, effective January 1, 1994. See Ch. 93-415, § 20, at 118, Laws of Fla. Pursuant to those amendments, if a claimant is not at overall MMI after receiving 104 weeks of temporary benefits, the claimant may nevertheless establish entitlement to PTD benefits by proving total disability due to an impairment “existing after the date of [MMI],” as a result of at least one of the claimant’s injuries. See City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So.2d 95, 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). In other words, a claimant can still prove entitlement to PTD before reaching overall MMI, if the claimant can prove he is PTD from one of his injuries standing alone. Id. at 100; see also McFarlane, Ferguson v. Whaley, 641 So.2d 173 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (<HOLDING>). Here, claimant had two medical conditions

A: holding ptd award predicated solely on the claimants physical injuries would be affirmed despite the fact the claimant had not reached psychiatric mmi
B: holding that negligence may be predicated on the foreseeable acts of third persons
C: holding that even though the medical evidence did not support the commissions findings that the plaintiff was restricted from any and all employment the award of total disability should be affirmed based on findings that the plaintiff had unsuccessfully sought suitable employment
D: holding that liability in a  1983 action must be predicated on personal involvement not on the basis of respondeat superior
A.