With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the plaintiff is a poor champion of consumers, a court must be especially careful not to grant relief that may undercut the proper functions of antitrust.”); see also II Phillip E. Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law, ¶ 370 at p. 253 (Rev. ed. 1995) ("Because protecting consumers from monopoly pricing is the central concern of antitrust, buyers have usually been preferred plaintiffs in private antitrust litigation. As a result, consumer standing to recover for an overcharge paid directly to an illegal cartel or monopoly is seldom doubted.”). 7 . See Southwest Suburban, 830 F.2d at 1379-80; Southaven, 715 F.2d at 1086-87; In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litig., 681 F.2d at 520; see also International Raw Materials, Ltd. v. Stauffer Chem. Co., 978 F.2d 1318, 1329 (3d Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1588, 123

A: holding that operator of storage facility who was neither a consumer nor producer of soda ash lacked standing to bring antitrust action against producers of soda ash where direct participants in market would be better plaintiffs
B: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue
C: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to bring securities claims relating to funds that plaintiffs did not own
D: holding that a plaintiff must show antitrust injury in order to bring an antitrust lawsuit
A.