With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Acts of Negligence Lastly, Barton contends that Whatabur-ger’s employees were negligent in violating its own company policies and procedures to minimize the risk of theft or robbery. Specifically, Barton alleges that Whatabur-ger’s employees committed the following acts of negligence: (1) store manager Da-vilyn Spencer left her safe key at the restaurant at the end of her shift; (2) Murray left his shift early without notifying Spencer; (3) Murray failed to count the money in the registers and deposit the excess in the safe at the end of his shift; and (4) eted murder committed on premises of Sonic restaurant was not foreseeable result of Sonic’s failure to employ security guard); Boggs v. Bottomless Pit Cooking Team, 25 S.W.3d 818, 824-25 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Cowart, 20 S.W.3d at 784-86 (holding that

A: holding corporation vicariously liable for assault on customer by assistant manager as customer was engaged in trying to settle a controversy concerning a portion of defendants business
B: holding that murder committed by customer was not foreseeable result of excessive sale of alcohol to customer
C: holding that arbitration clause which was included with product mailed to customer and with proviso that customer could return product within 30 days was binding on customer who did not return computer
D: holding former employee could properly use recollection of customer information where he did not otherwise misappropriate an actual customer list
B.