With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Cummings grabbed her hair and touched her skin; (3) Witt screamed at her; (4) Cummings and Witt suggested she apply for the African American Leadership Council to the exclusion of other opportunities; and (5) she was demoted from “intern” to “volunteer.” The first four of these do not describe “significant changes” in Adam’s “employment status,” and thus are not adverse actions. Although all four instances can be described as impolite, none changes Adam’s “wealth” or “career prospects.” And although they might be characterized as “humiliating” or “degrading,” Adam’s allegations fail to rise to the level that the Seventh Circuit has held is necessary to demonstrate a “significant negative alteration in the workplace.” See Breneisen v. Motorola, Inc., 512 F.3d 972, 982 (7th Cir. 2008) (<HOLDING>); Rhodes v. Ill. DOT, 359 F.3d 498, 505 (7th

A: holding that the decision to reprimand or transfer an employee if rescinded before the employee suffers a tangible harm is not an adverse employment action
B: holding that a similar written reprimand provided to an architect of the capitol employee was not materially adverse because it merely criticized his job performance
C: holding that scolding an em ployee for absence by introducing the employee by saying this is amy you probably havent met her yet because she is never here may have been offensive to the employee but was merely a petty slight that does not amount to a materially adverse action
D: holding that the employers failure to interact with the employee does not preclude the employee from losing on summary judgment because the employee must still prove that a reasonable accommodation could have been made
C.