With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". clause in Malone’s contract, moreover, automatically converts Malone’s wrongful default termination into a termination for convenience. CONCLUSION For the reasons above, we hold that the ASBCA had jurisdiction over the propriety of Malone’s default termination apart from a claim for a specific sum by either Malone or the government relating to the termination. On the merits, we reverse the ASBCA and conclude that because the government improperly defaulted Malone, the default is converted into a termination for convenience. REVERSED. 1 . The Claims Court has also held to the contrary. Gunn-Williams v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 531, 534-35 (1985) (stating that simple default termination is not government claim); see Industrial Coatings, Inc. v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 161, 162-64 (1986) (<HOLDING>). These decisions turn on the Claims Court’s

A: holding that court of claims has jurisdiction over actions for breach of standard contract
B: holding that this court does not have jurisdiction over tax claims for declaratory or equitable relief
C: holding that the claims court has no jurisdiction under the tucker act over claims to social security benefits
D: holding that direct access suit concerning propriety of default termination is request for declaratory relief over which claims court has no jurisdiction
D.