With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that she was in a committed relationship with B.O.C.’s sister and had no interest in a relationship with a male. The trial court specifically found in the Final Judgment of Paternity that it was the intent of the parties “that [B.O.C.] would provide the donor sperm with which [A.A.B.] became pregnant and that the child would be raised by [A.A.B.] and [B.O.C.’s] sister as the child’s Parents.” In a factually similar Texas case, In re H.C.S., 219 S.W.3d 33 (2006), a mother challenged the standing of a sperm donor to pursue a proceeding to establish the paternity of a child conceived through artificial insemination. The mother and her same-sex partner had asked the partner’s brother to act as a sperm donor so that the couple could have a child together. The parties did not pu d 523 (1994) (<HOLDING>). Because B.O.C. was a sperm donor he

A: holding that the signature requirement was an indispensable condition precedent and the failure to comply with it deprived the town of jurisdiction to annex
B: holding that the failure to comply with the statutory requirement of physician involvement prevented the mother from claiming that the sperm donor was not a legal parent under the donor nonpaternity statute
C: holding that a trial courts judgment must comply with the statutory requirement that the judgment contain written findings of fact and conclusions of law
D: holding that failure to comply with statutory prerequisite deprived the courts of subjectmatter jurisdiction
B.