With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". counsel’s final report, 16 F.3d at 1245. Consequently, the Court is not persuaded that the plaintiff has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that the information sought has “lost its character as Rule 6(e) material” due to its alleged considerable availability to the public. 2. Exemptions 6 and 7(C) The Archives also withheld the drafts of the proposed indictments under Exemptions 6 and 7(c) because the drafts involve a significant privacy interest that is not outweighed by any public interest that would justify disclosure. Def.’s Mem. at 9. Because the Archives has invoked both Exemptions 6 and 7(c), the Court will address only the question of whether the drafts were properly withheld under Exemption 7(c). See Roth v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 642 F.3d 1161, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (<HOLDING>); accord Gilliam v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 128

A: holding that there is no need to consider exemption 6 separately if information was compiled for law enforcement purposes because exemption 7c constitutes broader protection so any information falling under exemption 6 is covered by exemption 7c
B: holding the governments prior disclosure of requested information could not waive individuals privacy interests under exemption 6 and collecting cases involving exemption 7c
C: holding one who claims tax exemption has burden of showing entitlement to exemption
D: holding act qualifies as exemption statute under exemption 3
A.