With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 697 S.W.2d 332, 334 (Tenn.1985) (same). In finding specific jurisdiction, the district court relied on the following facts: (1) Lloyds sent three wire transfers from Hercules Holdings to the account of Space Age Industries in Erwin, Tennessee (Hogsed’s account); (2) Tennessee residents wired funds to The Bond Partnership at Lloyds; (3) Lloyds and its attorney responded to letters from Harris and other individuals in Tennessee about this litigation; and (4) Lloyds faxed a two-page bank statement to Hogsed detailing numerous transactions involving the transfer of substantial funds from Tennessee customers to the accounts of Hercules Holdings at Lloyds. The d response to communications initiated by Harris and others in Tennessee. Cf. Rice v. Karsch, 154 Fed.Appx. 454, 460 (6th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). See also Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 91 F.3d at

A: holding that internet purchase of one compact disc by plaintiffs counsel did not constitute purposeful availment
B: holding that defendants communications sent into tennessee did not constitute purposeful availment because all were in response to communications initiated by the plaintiff
C: holding ban preempted by federal communications commission regulations
D: holding that easements using terms telephone telegraph and communications could properly be utilized for both internal communications and for thirdparty voice and data communications
B.