With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". conduct. As such, this Court sees no likelihood whatsoever that our Circuit Court would conclude that the plaintiff has a constitutional privacy interest in such information. Therefore, defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count IV is GRANTED as to each individual defendant. III. Bivens Claim Finally, even if there was a right to privacy for such confidential information— which this Court finds there is not — plaintiffs complaint as to the defendants named in their personal capacity should be dismissed. An action for damages brought against federal officials in their individual capacity pursuant to the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as a Bivens claim. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 397, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) (<HOLDING>). However, in the Supreme Court “in most

A: holding that a federal cause of action for damages arises upon a federal agents unconstitutional conduct
B: holding plaintiff may sue federal agents for money damages for violation of his constitutional rights
C: recognizing an action for damages against unknown federal agents for the violation of constitutional rights
D: recognizing cause of action for damages against federal agents acting under their authority who allegedly violated plaintiffs fourth amendment rights
B.