With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or the child having been shaken severely." Transcript at 920. Dr. Rych-walski testified that severe shaking caused the retinal hemorrhages. Dr. Betty Spi-vak, an expert in pediatric medicine and forensics, testified that impact and shaking caused Blake's injuries Dr. Margie Joyce, an expert in the field of radiology and pediatric radiology, testified that the findings of subdural hematomas together with other bone fractures are highly suspicious of battered child syndrome. Consequently, the record reveals overwhelming evidence, and any violation of separation of witnesses order was harmless. There is no reasonable probability that Dr. Burrows's testimony regarding the chest bruise and sternum rub contributed to the verdict. See, e.g., Osborne v. State, 754 N.E.2d 916, 927 (Ind.2001) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the trial court did not abuse

A: holding that the admission of a family photo was harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence in support of the conviction
B: holding that any error that court may have made in admitting inadmissible evidence was harmless because government presented overwhelming evidence establishing defendants guilt
C: holding the error harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt
D: holding that the error of allowing unsequestered witnesses to testify in violation of a motion to separate witnesses was harmless error because the state presented overwhelming evidence supporting defendants conviction
D.