With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 3 . In applying a broad definition of “transaction or occurrence,” we effectuate Trial Rule 13’s "intended purpose of avoiding multiple lawsuits between the same parties arising from the same event[s],” Bacompt Syst., 752 N.E.2d at 144 (citations omitted). 4 . See, e.g., Murray v. Mansheim, 779 N.W.2d 379, 390 (S.D.2010) (disallowing compulsory counterclaims seeking affirmative relief where limitations period had expired); Duhammel v. Star, 133 Ariz. 558, 653 P.2d 15, 16-17 (Ariz.App.1982) (affirming trial court’s dismissal of counterclaim allegations seeking affirmative relief for libel and slander where counterclaim was filed after one-year statute of limitations expired), overruled on other grounds; Pharmaresearch Corp. v. Mash, 163 N.C.App, 419, 594 S.E.2d 148, 153-54 (2004) (<HOLDING>), review denied. 5 . See, e.g., Doxey-Layton

A: holding that the amended complaint could not relate back to the original complaint in which all claims were barred by the statute of limitations
B: holding that the uccs fouryear statute of limitations provision which barred an action by the plaintiff did not bar a thirdparty contribution and indemnity claim
C: holding defendants counterclaims barred by statute of limitations and did not relate back to date plaintiff filed action
D: holding that back pay may be awarded to the date of judgment
C.