With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 978 (2008), rev den, 346 Or 364 (2009). Under ORS 144.103(1), a defendant sentenced to a term of imprisonment for committing certain sexual offenses, including first-degree sexual abuse, “shall serve a term of post-prison supervision that continues until the term of the post-prison supervision, when added to the term of imprisonment served, equals the maximum statutory indeterminate sentence for the violation.” The maximum statutory indeterminate sentence for first-degree sexual abuse, a Class B felony, is 10 years. ORS 163.427(2); ORS 161.605(2). Thus, it follows that the court erred in imposing a 10-year period of post-prison supervision. We have previously treated similar errors as apparent on the face of the record. See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 212 Or App 135, 157 P3d 295 (2007) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, for the reasons we articulated in

A: recognizing plain or fundamental error
B: holding that any error was harmless and thus not plain error
C: holding that omission was not plain error
D: holding that imposition of excessive term of postprison supervision under ors 144103 was plain error
D.