With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (3) (b) (532 SE2d 677) (2000). 23 Barnes v. State, 269 Ga. 345, 351-352 (10) (496 SE2d 674) (1998); see also King v. State, 273 Ga. 258, 267 (18) (e) (539 SE2d 783) (2000) (addressing defendant’s improper attempt to have prospective juror prejudge what weight she might give to a specific item of mitigating evidence). 24 Mize, 269 Ga. at 652 (6) (d). 25 Barnes, 269 Ga. at 351-352 (10). 26 Carr, 267 Ga. at 554 (6) (a). 27 Sears v. State, 270 Ga. 834, 840 (2) (514 SE2d 426) (1999). 28 Id. 29 Earnest v. State, 262 Ga. 494, 495 (1) (422 SE2d 188) (1992). 30 373 U. S. 83 (83 SC 1194, 10 LE2d 215) (1963). 31 Carter v. State, 252 Ga. 502, 506 (6) (315 SE2d 646) (1984); Hines v. State, 249 Ga. 257, 258-259 (1) (290 SE2d 911) (1982). 32 Woods v. State, 265 Ga. 685, 687 (3) (461 SE2d 535) (1995) (<HOLDING>). 33 Wilson v. State, 271 Ga. 811, 819 (14)

A: holding that admission of graphic photographs of murder victim was not abuse of discretion under rule 403
B: holding the trial court had abused its discretion in admitting several photographs of a murder victims body
C: recognizing trial courts discretion in weighing the allegedlyimproper prejudicial aspects of photographs of victims against the photographs probative value
D: holding probative value of evidence must be balanced against any prejudicial effect
C.