With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". if erroneous at all. See generally United States v. Barry, 938 F.2d 1327, 1337-38 (D.C.Cir.1991). The district court recognized Suschanke was the one who “sought [the child pornography] out,” and Suschanke brought the offensive images into the home computer. Even if the abrogation of United States v. Hawk Wing, 433 F.3d 622, 629-30 (8th Cir.2006) (affirming a district court’s decision to consider rehabilitation when deciding whether to impose a lengthier sentence) is forthcoming, “nothing ... prohibits sentencing courts from considering rehabilitative needs for other reasons, such as in selecting a shorter term of imprisonment.” In re Sealed Case, 573 F.3d 844, 851 (D.C.Cir. 2009). See generally Pepper v. United States, — U.S. -, -, 131 S.Ct. 1229, 1241, 179 L.Ed.2d 196 (2011) (<HOLDING>). The district court merely stated, “I also

A: holding that resentencing should consider all sentencing arguments and remanding for court to consider defendants argument for downward departure based on postconviction rehabilitation
B: holding that a district court is not to consider evidence of postconviction rehabilitation in deciding whether to resentence under crosby
C: holding district courts may consider rehabilitation when deciding whether to impose a more lenient sentence at a defendants resentencing
D: holding that resentencing is required
C.