With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". orders are void.”). 35 . In re Walker, 51 F.3d 562, 568 (5th Cir.1995). 36 . 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a). 37 . 28 U.S.C. § 1334(e)(1); see also Kane Enters. v. MacGregor (USA) Inc., 322 F.3d 371, 374 (5th Cir.2003) ("The district in which a chapter 11 petition is filed has exclusive jurisdiction over the property of the estate.”). 38 . See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b). 39 . 28 U.S.C. § 157(a). 40 . Bankruptcy judges "may hear and determine all cases under title 11 and all core proceedings arising under title 11, or arising in a case under title 11” and "enter appropriate orders and judgment.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); In re Wood, 825 F.2d 90, 95 (5th Cir.1987). In contrast to core proceedings, bankruptcy judges have the limited power to “hear a proceeding that is not a core 92 F.2d 502, 1182 (3d Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). 55 . Celotex, 514 U.S. at 327, 115 S.Ct.

A: holding that the superior court had no jurisdiction over the division of marital property when the district court had properly invoked jurisdiction over the property
B: holding that a consent order purporting to exert jurisdiction over nonestate property cannot be utilized to support a finding of subject matter jurisdiction over claims that otherwise could not be heard in bankruptcy court
C: holding over
D: holding that state law claims cannot pend from a federal one over which the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction
B.