With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". presumed"); Computer Assocs. Int'l v. Quest Software, Inc., 333 F.Supp.2d 688, 700 (N.D.Ill.2004) (under the Illinois UTSA, "[tJhere is a presumption of irreparable harm to the plaintiff in cases of trade secret misappropriation"); Union Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. Tillman, 143 F.Supp.2d 638, 641-42 (N.D.Miss.2000) (under the Mississippi UTSA, "to be awarded an injunction," a plaintiff "need not demonstrate irreparable injury; a violation of the Act itself constitutes irreparable injury"); Tracer Research Corp. v. Nat'l Env't Serv. Co., 843 F.Supp. 568, 582 (D.Ariz.1993) (once a plaintiff has established misappropriation under the Arizona UTSA, "it is presumed that it will suffer irreparable and im-immediate harm"). 15 . See Sys. Concepts, Inc. v. Dixon, 669 P.2d 421, 428 (Utah 1983) (<HOLDING>). 16 , See cases cited supra 14. The dissent

A: holding that a likely or actual threatened harm is sufficient to sustain injunctive relief as it is an anficipatory remedy purposed to prevent the perpetration of a threatened wrong or compel the cessation of a continuing one and concluding that a former employee working for a competitor is enough to infer such future harm internal quotation marks omitted
B: holding that if defendants violated substantive or procedural provision of esa a court does not have traditional equitable discretion instead any threatened harm is per se irreparable harm and  public interest always favors the imposition of an injunction
C: holding that evidence of threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill supports a finding of irreparable harm
D: holding that beneficiary of general support trust has a legal right to compel distribution of funds internal quotation marks omitted
A.