With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the facts alleged in the complaint took place. See P.L.1997, ch. 251, § 1 (effective Sept. 19, 1997) (adding "clergy members” to the list of those responsible for reporting child abuse). 5 . In limited circumstances, courts have recognized that an actor may have a duty to warn third parties of the dangerous propensities of another when the actor has a special relationship with the dangerous person and the person threatened is a specific, foreseeable, and identifiable victim of the dangerous person’s threats. See, e.g., Tarasoff v. Regents ofUniv. of Cal., 17 Cal.3d 425, 131 Cal.Rptr. 14, 551 P.2d 334, 345 (1976); Thompson v. County of Alameda rcumstances to have a duty of care to protect others from harm by third parties are: innke h 925, 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 811, 968 P.2d 522, 527-29 (1998) (<HOLDING>); cf. J.E.J. v. Tri-County Big Brothers/Big

A: holding that school officials were immune from suit claiming they failed to protect student from an inschool stabbing
B: holding that no special relationship existed between the school and student
C: holding that university had duty to protect student from reasonably foreseeable fraternity hazing
D: holding that a school had no duty to protect pedestrian from student
D.