With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ROBRENO, District Judge. Before the Court is the issue of what amount of factual detail and degree of particularity must be pled to state a cause of action for conspiracy to violate 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 122 L.Ed.2d 517 (1993) (<HOLDING>). Plaintiff Francis J. Loftus (“Loftus”) brings

A: holding that a municipality may be held liable as a person under  1983
B: holding that municipality may not be held liable under  1983 upon theory of respondeat superior
C: holding inter alia that a municipality cannot be held liable under section 1983 on a respondeat superior theory
D: holding that  1983 actions against a municipality cannot be held to a heightened standard of specificity
D.