With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and precludes a conviction for driving without a valid license, although the driver may still be subject to a small fine for not having the license in his immediate possession when stopped. Understood this way, Appellant’s constitutional complaints based on “retroactive amnesty’ lose their premise. 3. Appellant is ineligible for a Georgia driver’s license because he is an illegal immigrant, and he argues that his inability to have taken advantage of OCGA § 40-5-20 (a)’s safe-harbor provision for this reason violates due process and equal protection, urging us to apply heightened scrutiny to those claims. However, to the consternation of generations of American teenagers, there is no fundamental right to a driver’s license. See Quitter v. Bowman, 262 Ga. 769, 771 (425 SE2d 641) (1993) (<HOLDING>). And illegal immigrants have never been

A: holding that there is no fundamental right to run for office
B: holding right to be fundamental
C: holding that the right to drive is not a fundamental right
D: recognizing that a criminal defendants right to a fair trial is fundamental
C.