With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 2007). Texas decisions supporting this proposition have not expressly defined the meaning of the phrase “the present right to compel legal title.” Courts have, however, focused on whether the complaining party has the ability to directly control who will ultimately have legal title to a given property. See Primrose Houston 7 Housing, L.P., 288 S.W.3d at 787 (illustrating that the present right to compel legal title exists where “(1) parent company A holds a full ownership interest in its subsidiary B; (2) B holds legal title to certain Real Property; (3) upon dissolution of B, legal title to its Real Property will revert to A; and (4) A has the power to dissolve B at any time.”); see also Harris County Appraisal Dist. v. Se. Texas Hous. Fin. Corp., 991 S.W.2d 18, 21 (Tex.App. 1998) (<HOLDING>). The Trustee’s argument that the holding in

A: holding that an entity had equitabletitle because through its own actions it could compel legal title to properties to change hands
B: holding employer thirdparty beneficiary could compel arbitration
C: holding that it is not in the public interest to compel parties to go through the expense of preparing a case for trial when all of that preparation could be rendered moot by a reversal on an interlocutory appeal
D: holding a party to be an initial transferee because she was given legal title to the funds
A.