With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". sex-based discrimination is a violation of equal protection if it “does not ‘serve important governmental objectives’ and is not ‘substantially related to achievement of those objectives.’ ” Lipsett, 864 F.2d at 896 (quoting Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 234-35, 99 S.Ct. 2264, 60 L.Ed.2d 846 (1979)). Therefore, if plaintiffs complaint sufficiently alleges the elements of a sexual harassment claim, she will succeed in establishing a Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim as well as a Title VII claim. See Siaca v. Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto Rico, 160 F.Supp.2d 188, 195 (D.P.R.2001) (“[A] plaintiff may assert a claim for employment discrimination under both Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1983”); Ribot Espada v. Woodroffe, et al., 896 F.Supp. 69 (D.P.R.1995) (<HOLDING>). 2. Sexual Harassment Claim Against Hernández

A: holding that title vii did not provide exclusive remedy for sex discrimination in public employment claim could also be brought under equal protection clause
B: holding that a claim for discrimination in private employment is not preempted by title vii
C: recognizing that a claim of hostile environment sex discrimination is actionable under title vii
D: recognizing title vii does not provide the exclusive remedy for all employment discrimination claims even if the title vii and section 1983 claim factually overlap
A.