With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". grant which is subsequently stolen. Immediately following its description of this scenario, the Smith court observes that “its theft would not then be within the reach of 18 U.S.C. § 641.” Smith, 596 F.2d at 664. Unlike the scenario of an outright recipient who rightfully receives federal funds outright and has monies stolen after first obtaining possession, this case involves a situation where the government’s interest never ceased due to the erroneous nature of the disbursement. See United States v. Miller, 520 F.2d at 1210. The existence of a statutory mechanism for recovery of erroneous funds, 26 U.S.C. § 7405, underscores the continuing and strong federal interest in recovering the erroneous disbursement. See, e.g., United States v. Carr, 706 F.2d 1108, 1109-11 (11th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>). But, the fundamental error in the majority’s

A: recognizing that statutes and regulations concerning their issuance and replacement reveal a strong federal proprietary interest in stolen savings bonds
B: recognizing that taxpayers are not entitled to interest on cash bonds
C: recognizing that in 1998 the legislature repealed a previous version of the statute and enacted two statutes in replacement
D: recognizing strong public interest in maintaining confidentiality of official records concerning child abuse
A.