With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to be accorded to the evidence produced are matters within the province of the trier of fact, who is free to believe all, some or none of the evidence. Commonwealth v. Passarelli, 789 A.2d 708, 716 (Pa.Super.2001) (citations and quotations omitted). ¶ 5 A person is guilty of aggravated assault under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 2702, Aggravated assault, (a)(1), “if he (1) attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such injury intentionally, knowingly or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.” The evidence presented in this matter showed appellant confronted Burger at a distance of a few feet and pointed a handgun directly in Burger’s face. (N.T., at 23, 50-51, 70, 104.) See Commonwealth v. Nichols, 692 A.2d 181 (Pa.Super.1997) (<HOLDING>). Appellant, an expert marksman, also fired a

A: holding specific intent to cause serious bodily injury may be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon upon a vital part of the body
B: holding specific intent to harm may be inferred from the circumstances and that finding is a matter for the jury
C: holding intent may be inferred from all facts and circumstances
D: holding intent may be inferred from large amount of marijuana
A.