With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that he understood that the State sought habitualization and that an open plea could result in a sentence as low as the bottom of the guidelines or up to thirty years. After Cooper acknowledged his understanding, the trial court accepted the admission and plea. . However, Cooper filed a motion for downward departure, so the trial court deferred pronouncing a sentence. On February 7, 2003, the trial court conducted the sentencing hearing in which it ultimately denied the motion for downward departure. The trial court revoked Cooper’s probation and sentenced him to 48.6 concurrent months on the burglary of a dwelling and dealing in stolen property charges. Cooper was also sentenced to 41.712 months as a habitual felony offender for delivery of cocaine. Cooper’s sentences were e 2000) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we find the scoresheet

A: holding defendant sentenced to term equal to maximum guidelines sentence under improperly calculated sentencing guidelines scoresheet was not entitled to be resentenced because defendant was habitualized such that sentencing guidelines score sheet was irrelevant and the sentence imposed was not illegal
B: holding habitual sentence rendered guidelines scoresheet irrelevant
C: holding that under the 1991 version of the habitual offender statute defendant could not receive habitual offender sentence for life felony
D: holding habitual offender sentence rendered any errors in guidelines score sheet harmless
D.