With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in support of their motion, he insists that the Court cannot consider them, and the Privacy Policy in particular, on the ground that his claim does not depend on their contents. Pl.’s Opp’n at 13-14. The Court disagrees. Plaintiff alleges that he signed up to use Zimride but never consented to the disclosure of his personal information. But to use Zimride, Plaintiff necessarily had to agree with Zimride’s TOS and Privacy Policy, which clearly state that such information may, in fact, be disclosed. Because Plaintiffs claim necessarily depends on the application of Zimride’s policies — which relate directly to the issue of consent — the Court finds that these documents may appropriately be considered on a motion to dismiss. See Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1076 (9th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>); Parrino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d 699, 706 (9th

A: holding that a court ruling on a motion to dismiss may consider a document that is referenced in the complaint and is central to the plaintiffs claims
B: holding that a mere passing reference or even references however to a document outside the complaint does not on its own incorporate the document into the complaint itself citation omitted
C: holding that a court may consider a document submitted by a defendant in determining whether to dismiss the complaint because it was integral to and explicitly relied on in the complaint and because the plaintiffs do not challenge its authenticity
D: holding that in connection with a motion to dismiss the court may consider a document not attached to the pleadings where the plaintiffs claim depends on the contents of a document the defendant attaches the document to its motion to dismiss and the parties do not dispute the authenticity of the document even though the plaintiff does not explicitly allege the contents of that document in the complaint
D.