With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". be retained by appellee over a portion of lot B. At appellant’s insistence, that provision was deleted prior to execution of the contract. However, on the day of the closing, appellee secretly prepared an easement subjecting lot B to an easement in favor of lot D, and subsequently recorded the deed. The court held that appellee could not, while owner of both the dominant estate (lot D) and servient estate (lot B), carve out an -easement by grant to himself. No other reported Florida case has specifically addressed the issue of whether one who owns adjoining, unencumbered parcels in the same right, may create an easement over one parcel in favor of the other, but several, other átate and federal courts have disapproved of such action. See, e.g., Mottos v. Seaton, 839 A.2d 553 (R.I.2004) (<HOLDING>); Mikels v. Roger, 232 Cal.App.3d 334, 284 Cal.

A: holding no easement can be created over a section of land in favor of another adjoining parcel when one owner owns both properties
B: holding that an easement agreement and an unrecorded easement plan created an easement
C: recognizing that one cannot have an easement in his own land
D: holding one cannot grant an easement to oneself one can only reserve such interest in land granted to another
A.