With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Travis Hedrick appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Arch Specialty Insurance Company in this insurance case. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Arch Specialty Ins. Co. v. Hedrick, No. 1:13-cv-00621-TDS-JLW, 2014 WL 6627039 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2014); see also Britt v. Hayes, 142 N.C.App. 190, 541 S.E.2d 761, 762 (2001) (<HOLDING>). We dispense with oral argument because the

A: holding that ordinary negligence and gross negligence are not separate causes of action
B: holding that claims of battery and negligence are compatible
C: holding that because negligence and breach of fiduciary duty claims are covered by the martin act these claims must be dismissed
D: holding that plaintiffs negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims are not independent of the breach of contract claim and summary judgment is warranted on these claims
B.