With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". district court nonetheless found that exhaustion of the CRP is “preferable” in light of policies that generally favor exhaustion. Id. Although there is some merit in encouraging resort to the CRP to allow California to correct problems before litigation and to further develop administrative records for judicial review, we conclude that the district court erred in basing its exhaustion determination on a policy analysis independent of the IDEA’S requirements. If a statute does not provide for exhaustion of administrative remedies, a district court may require exhaustion in the exercise of its discretion. Hoeft, 967 F.2d at 1302. “The IDEA, however, does provide administrative appeal procedures to be pursued before seeking judicial review.” Id.; 7, 113 S.Ct. 2539, 125 L.Ed.2d 113 (1993) (<HOLDING>). The exhaustion scheme provided in § 1415 of

A: holding exhaustion is required regardless of the relief offered through administrative procedures
B: holding that administrative remedies must be exhausted prior to filing a claim in court
C: holding that a courts authority to require exhaustion of administrative remedies in actions brought under the apa is limited when neither the statute nor agency rules specifically mandate exhaustion as a prerequisite to judicial review
D: holding that it would be inconsistent with congress intent to require exhaustion of optional appeals through state procedures after an aggrieved party has exhausted all administrative remedies expressly prescribed by congress in the administrative procedures act apa
D.