With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". much smaller amounts of cocaine from Hands (3/é grams every two or three weeks). We do not suggest that a jury may not convict a defendant based upon testimony that is given in exchange for favorable treatment by the prosecution. If a jury finds it credible, testimony such as that heard in this case will be sufficient to support a conviction. When we assess the strength of the government’s case for purposes of harmless error analysis, however, we may take into account factors— such as incentives to lie — that would have affected the jury’s assessment of a witness’s testimony. In Marshall, for example, the government, in a prosecution for possession of crack cocaine, relied primarily on the testimony of a police informant who claimed to have purchased crack from the defen th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). The government’s case against Hands contained

A: holding erroneous admission of evidence not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where the only other evidence against defendant was the uncorroborated testimony of a cooperating witness of questionable credibility
B: holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt
C: holding a miranda violation was not harmless error when the only other inculpatory evidence was the testimony of a single cooperating witness who claimed to have conspired with the defendant
D: holding that the erroneous admission of dna evidence is never harmless
A.