With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". property where the entire cost exceeds $10,000. A school board cannot avoid this bidding requirement by contracting for materials or services “piecemeal” for the purpose of obtaining prices under $10,000. 24 P.S. § 7-751(f). Bennett argues that the Board clearly violated these sections of the Code because the dugouts were constructed “piecemeal” at a cost in excess of $10,000. Bennett also argues that limiting his remedy to the appeal process of Section 2451 penalizes taxpayers for the mistakes of auditors. We understand Bennett’s concerns over the actions of the school officials in this case, but we cannot ignore the holdings of our courts that auditors’ reports must be challenged exclusively as provided by statute. Skelton v. Lower Merion Township, 318 Pa. 356, 178 A. 387 (1935) (<HOLDING>); Festa v. Derry Township, 49 Pa.Cmwlth. 297,

A: holding that a tax collectors assumpsit claim was barred for having failed to submit his claim to the township auditors
B: holding disability discrimination claim barred
C: holding that the appellant waived his claim on appeal because he failed to address that claim in either his application for a coa or his brief on appeal
D: holding age discrimination claim barred
A.