With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". . See, e.g., Bacon, 411 S.W.3d at 173 (quoting IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d at 854 (quoting Tex. Gov’t Code § 311.034; University of Tex. Med. Branch v. York, 871 S.W.2d 175, 177 (Tex. 1994))). 51 . See Mission Consol., Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Garcia, 253 S.W.3d 653, 655 (Tex. 2008); see also Taylor, 106 S.W.3d at 697 ("[W]hen construing a statute that purportedly waives sovereign immunity, we generally resolve ambi- guides by retaining immunity.” (citations omitted)). 52 . See, e.g., State v. Shumake, 199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex. 2006) (citing In re Forlenza, 140 S.W.3d 373, 376 (Tex. 2004)). 53 . See Texas Educ. Agency v. Leeper, 893 S.W.2d 432, 446 (Tex. 1994) (citing Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 37.009). 54 . See Tex. Loc. Gov’t Code § 252.061; see also Carowest Land, Ltd., 432 S.W.3d at 532-33 (<HOLDING>). In their live petition, Plaintiffs also

A: holding that a party waives an argument that it raises in the background section of its brief but not in the argument section
B: holding city waives immunity by entering into contract
C: recognizing that section 252061 waives immunity
D: recognizing that immunity may be waived
C.