With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ("[This Court has repeatedly held that it is improper for a prosecutor to ask jurors to have sympathy for crime victims." (citing Tobler v. State, 1984 OK CR 90, ¶¶ 16-17, 688 P.2d 350, 354)). 48 . Hence this Court finds that Roy has established inadequate performance in this regard. 49 . Hence we find that Roy has failed to show "prejudice" on his ineffective assistance claim regarding this evidence and that his second Proposition II claim fails accordingly. 50 . See generally 12 0.$.2001, § 2404; see also Burks v. State, 1979 OK CR 10, 594 P.2d 771 {establishing standards for admission of "other crimes" evidence under § 2404(B)), overruled in part on other grounds in Jones v. State, 1989 OK CR 7, ¶ 8, 772 P.2d 922, 925; Freeman v. State, 1988 OK CR 192, ¶¶ 2-9, 767 P.2d 1354, 1355-57 (<HOLDING>). 51 . Roy's second ineffective assistance

A: holding that if a crime is broadly defined the court can look beyond the elements of the crime
B: holding that an indictment is sufficient as long as it fully and clearly sets out the crime and the elements of the offense even if the evidence consists of proof of other means of committing the same crime
C: holding that prohibitions of  2404b and burks apply equally to evidence that stigmatizes the defendant though it does not establish a separate crime if the other acts evidence is unrelated to the crime at issue
D: holding that counsel did not admit the defendant was guilty of a crime when counsel noted that if the evidence established the commission of any crime that crime was voluntary manslaughter not murder
C.