With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". See Holloway v. Hornsby, 23 F.3d 944, 945 (5th Cir.1994) (affirming the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of a § 1983 complaint alleging denial of access to prison grievance procedures and being subjected to threats and taunts in retaliation for filing prior grievances). To establish a conspiracy claim cognizable under § 1983, a prisoner must demonstrate (1) an agreement between persons acting under color of state law to commit an illegal act, and (2) an actual deprivation of the prisoner’s constitutional rights in furtherance of the agreement. Hale v. Townley, 45 F.3d 914, 920 (5th Cir.1995). Conclusory allegations of conspiracy will not support a claim under § 1983. Wilson v. Budney, 976 F.2d 957, 958 (5th Cir.1992). See Young v. Biggers, 938 F.2d 565, 569 (5th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). Plaintiff has presented no evidence of an

A: holding that a civil rights claim of conspiracy must include allegations of specific operative facts
B: holding that plaintiffs civil conspiracy claim was barred by section 343909c
C: holding a pleading will not be sufficient to state a claim under the civil rights act if the allegations are mere conclusions
D: holding that a conspiracy claim must contain supportive factual allegations describing the general composition of the conspiracy some or all of its broad objectives and the defendants general role in the conspiracy
A.