With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". presence of the vast majority of original, relevant documents in Europe, the district court did not err when it found this factor slightly favors dismissal. Similarly, the district court did not err when determining the public interest factors tipped toward dismissal. The district court correctly observed that “any local interest in this case ... is slight and does not exceed or even come close to the interest other [European] forums ... have in the adjudication of this controversy.” The burden on local courts and juries unconnected to the case and the costs of resolving a dispute unrelated to the forum also favor dismissal. Finally, the district court concluded its lack of familiarity with foreign law counseled in favor of dismissal. See Piper, 454 U.S. at 260 & n. 29, 102 S.Ct. 252 (<HOLDING>). The district court found that the balance of

A: holding that a party relying on foreign law must plead and prove it and partys failure to do so entitles court to assume that foreign law is the same as forum law
B: holding that while the need to apply foreign law does not warrant dismissal in itself it is a factor favoring dismissal
C: holding that it is not
D: holding that  109g2 does not apply when there was no unresolved motion pending at the time when the debtor sought dismissal
B.