With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to claim as exempt an unlimited value or amount of money held in the form of any of the accounts or entitlements described in the statute. As it now stands, the statute violates MINN. CONST. Art. 1, § 12, which provides that “[a] reasonable amount of property shall be exempt from seizure or sale for the payment of any debt or liability. The amount of such exemption shall be determined by law.” In re Tveten, 402 N.W.2d 551 (Minn.1987) (concluding that exemption statute which does not impose some type of limitation on subject property violates implied constitutional requirement that only “reasonable amount” may be so set aside). Because the statute is unconstitutional, it is ineffective in its entirety as against a trustee in bankruptcy. In re Hilary, 76 B.R. 683 (Bankr.D.Minn.1987) (<HOLDING>). The nature and effect of the exemption

A: holding that an insider claiming he was exempt from liability under  16b had the burden of bringing himself within the exemption
B: holding familymusicalinstrument exemption of minn stat  55037 subd 2 was unconstitutional under tveten analysis and concluding that asset in question was not exempt
C: holding attorney workproduct was exempt from disclosure under foia exemption 5 even after the case was dismissed and litigation terminated by the ftc
D: holding a debtors claim for loss of consortium to be entitled to an exemption under the oklahoma exemption statute and collecting other bankruptcy decisions recognizing a debtor spouses loss of consortium as the basis for allowing an exemption under federal and various state exemption statutes
B.