With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". dealing, and because State Farm was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the judgment entered pursuant to a directed verdict in the district court is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. SOSA, Senior J„ and STOWERS, J., concur. 1 . See Archuleta v. Pina, 86 N.M. 94, 95, 519 P.2d 1175, 1176 (1974); Sanchez v. Gomez, 57 N.M. 383, 387, 259 P.2d 346, 348 (1953); Morris v. Cartwright, 57 N.M. 328, 332, 258 P.2d 719, 722 (1953); Cavazos v. Geronimo Bus Lines, 56 N.M. 624, 627, 247 P.2d 865, 866 (1952); Sandoval v. Cortez, 88 N.M. 170, 173-74, 538 P.2d 1192, 1195 (Ct.App.1975); Brown v. Hall, 80 N.M. 556, 557, 458 P.2d 808, 809 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 80 N.M. 607, 458 P.2d 859 (1969). 2 . See, e.g., Petersen v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Puerto Rico, Inc., 617 F.Supp. 1039, 1042 (D.V.I.1985) (<HOLDING>); Mitford v. De Lasala, 666 P.2d 1000, 1007

A: holding implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing found in some commercial contracts does not extend to atwill employment contracts
B: recognizing cause of action for implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in atwill employment contract
C: recognizing an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by all parties in the performance of a contract for the sale of real estate
D: recognizing that evidence of breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing may support punitive damages
B.