With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". value to each parcel); United Nat’l Corp. v. Cty. of Hennepin, No. 1482, 1983 WL 1026 (Minn.-T.C. Apr. 21, 1983) (valuing three parcels comprising a shopping center as a single unit). These cases stand for the unremarkable proposition that tax parcels may be combined for property tax purposes. None of these cases address whether the unit-rule method is properly applied to value a collection of contiguous and non-contiguous parcels that stretches across multiple taxing districts in four counties. 15 . We acknowledge that such a parcel-by-parcel determination in the case of 4,680 parcels may be tedious, but that is a determination required by the Legislature, not by this court. See, e.g., Under the Rainbow Child Care Ctr., Inc. v. Cty. of Goodhue, 741 N.W.2d 880, 890 (Minn.2007) (<HOLDING>). We also observe that Blandin had the right to

A: holding that claim premised on the organizing arming and disciplining of members of the national guard involved issue committed expressly to the political branches of government
B: recognizing that standing doctrine is fundamentally rooted in respect for the separation of powers of the independent branches of government
C: recognizing that when other branches of government are remiss in their constitutional duties the judiciary must act
D: recognizing that tax policy choices are appropriately left to the political branches
D.