With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Minn.Stat. § 504B.001, subd. 12 (2014) (emphasis added). It also defines “tenancy at will” as “a tenancy in which the tenant holds possession by permission of the landlord.” Id., subd. 13 (2014) (emphasis added). Unlike the tenants in Jones, the Mitch-ells did not enter into a lease with the owners of the property after the foreclosure. Cf. 720 N.W.2d at 353-54 (describing tenancy arrangement after foreclosure). Since the Mitchells did not enter into a lease with either Wells Fargo or Freddie Mac after foreclosure and did not have either Wells Fargo’s or Freddie Mac’s permission to remain in possession of the property after foreclosure, they are not tenants for purposes of Minn.Stat. § 504B.121. See Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul v. Obermoller, 429 N.W.2d 251, 258 (Minn.App.1988) (<HOLDING>), review denied (Minn. Oct. 26, 1988). The

A: holding that foreclosure suit brought six years after judgment in timely suit was not timebarred because tax liens are enforceable at any time
B: holding landlord and tenants obligations mutually dependent
C: holding under a precursor to minnstat  504b121 that former owners are not tenants after a foreclosure
D: holding that tenants had standing to bring fourth amendment claim where tenants were threatened with eviction unless they consented to allegedly unreasonable warrantless searches
C.