With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". on this appeal, is held sufficient to sustain the verdict found and the judgment of conviction based thereon, we do not approve of such information as a model pleading, nor do we express any opinion as to whether the allegations, as to the former conviction, would have been sufficient as against a proper and timely objection in the trial court. The case before us demonstrates that those in charge of criminal prosecutions should exercise the greatest possible care in the preparation of criminal infor-mations. The numerous practice questions which arise in criminal cases are a burden upon the courts which might well be obviated, and which would be obviated if the attorneys for the prosecution exercised that care in the performance of their labors which the importance thereof ju 910) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 16] The dissent cites several Federal

A: holding that being deported after a conviction for an aggravated felony is all that is required and it is irrelevant whether the conviction is valid at the time of sentencing
B: holding that it is not
C: holding allegation of former conviction is sufficient if it enables plaintiff to prepare for trial of whether he is the convict
D: holding there was no claim and no basis for a claim of surprise concerning allegation of a former conviction
C.