With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to Palmer’s current conviction specifically provides: Any conviction which has been expunged, or set aside or for which a person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored shall not he considered a conviction for purposes of this chapter, unless such pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms. 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20) (emphasis added) (defining the statutory term “crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year”). Chapter 44 includes both § 922 and § 924, which sets out maximum sentences for offenses under this chapter. Accordingly, “for purposes of this chapter” clearly includes sentencing. See, e.g., United States v. Traxel, 914 F.2d 119, 122 (8th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). Thus, because the governing statute

A: holding that the definition in  921a20 applied throughout the entire firearms chapter of the uscode
B: holding that the first amendment definition should be applied by analogy in the franks setting
C: holding that unlawful possession of five firearms throughout a four to five month period established a behavior pattern of unlawfully possessing   firearms  that meets the same course of conduct requirement
D: holding that the definition of operating deficits is not ambiguous despite the absence of a definition of the phrase in the contract
A.