With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". seems to be that he “abandon[ed] the company in the middle of its problems with Lovejoy.” See note 25, supra. But there was nothing in the limited liability company agreement — or, for that matter, any other agreement — that obligated Glenn to continue serving as Mii’s employee, as opposed to its member (a role that, as just discussed, did not come with any obligations to render services to the company). Nor did the limited liability company agreement obligate Glenn to continue serving as Mii’s manager. See Part II. A.1, supra. Thus, the only provision of the limited liability agreement that Glenn violated by withdrawing was the prohibition on voluntary withdrawal itself, and Alan has not identified any damages that followed from that withdrawal. Cf. Federalpha Steel, 368 B.R. at 690 (<HOLDING>). Glenn is therefore entitled to summary

A: recognizing similar duties
B: recognizing the right of an llc member or assignee to bring a derivative action on behalf of the llc when another member breaches a contractual or fiduciary duty owed to the llc
C: recognizing cause of action for wrongful death
D: recognizing claim for wrongful dissociation based on members ceasing participation in the llcs management and ceasing honoring its duties and obligations under the llc agreement
D.