With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". However, Medical Expert # 1, Dr. Abramson, found Hampton was capable of performing only light to medium work. (R. 70). Dr. Blackman testified that due to Hampton’s anger and depression interfering with his concentration, Hampton could not perform “even in the simplest of jobs now.” (R. 84). Once the psychiatrist established Hampton’s limitations performing the simplest of jobs due to his lack of mental concentration based on depression, the ALJ was required to call the VE to testify because the grid rules were no longer appropriate in determining whether Hampton could perform light to medium work where Hampton’s nonexertional impairments were so severe as to limit the range of work he could perform. Herron, 19 F.3d at 336; Allen v. Sullivan, 977 F.2d 385, 389-90 (7th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). Intertwined with claimant’s argument that the

A: holding the record viewed in its entirety does not support the aljs finding that allen had no nonexertional impairments
B: holding that when court applies the clearly erroneous standard court may not reverse boards finding of fact if after court reviews the record in its entirety the finding is supported by a plausible basis
C: holding that ambiguity will be found where writing viewed in its entirety fairly admits of more than one meaning
D: recognizing the aljs broad discretion to correct mistakes in the record
A.