With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". his spouse from testifying as to any confidential communication between the accused and the spouse. However, as the State points out, Ark. R. Evid. 510 states that a p s argument that the trial court erred in ruling that his handing of the gun and knife to his wife was not protected by the Rule 504 privilege, we hold that Ross has failed to demonstrate any prejudice as a result of this. There was other overwhelming evidence of Ross’s guilt in this case, including eyewitness testimony that Ross committed the murder and evidence that Ross admitted to both his wife and his friend Steve Long that he committed the murder. Because we cannot see how Ross was prejudiced by the trial court’s decision on this matter, we will not reverse. See Gaines v. State, 340 Ark. 99, 8 S.W.3d 547 (2000) (<HOLDING>). For these reasons, we affirm. Gladwin and

A: recognizing that no prejudice results where the evidence erroneously admitted was merely cumulative and an appellate court will not reverse for harmless error in the admission of evidence
B: holding that new evidence must be evidence that is not merely cumulative
C: holding that when evidence was erroneously admitted such error was harmless when the evidence was insignificant and cumulative
D: holding error in admission of evidence is harmless when it was merely cumulative to other evidence in the record
A.