With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". furtherance of the conspiracy within the limitations period. VI. The Attempted Monopolization Claim In addition to the conspiracy claims, West Penn alleges that UPMC violated section 2 of the Sherman Act by attempting to monopolize the Allegheny County market for specialized hospital services. The elements of attempted monopolization are (1) that the defendant has a specific intent to monopolize, and (2) that the defendant has engaged in anticompetitive conduct that, taken as a whole, creates (3) a dangerous probability of achieving monopoly power. Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447, 456, 113 S.Ct. 884, 122 L.Ed.2d 247 (1993); Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 U.S. 375, 396, 25 S.Ct. 276, 49 L.Ed. 518 (1905); LePage’s Inc. v. SM, 324 F.3d 141, 162 (3d Cir.2003) (en banc) (<HOLDING>) (citing Cont’l Ore Co. v. Union Carbide &

A: holding appellate courts must consider the trial courts jury charge as a whole
B: holding district court erroneously failed to consider copyrighted show as a whole
C: holding that a contract will be read as a whole and the intent of each part will be gathered from a consideration of the whole
D: holding that a court should consider a defendants anticompetitive conduct as a whole rather than considering each aspect in isolation
D.