With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (<HOLDING>). We find merit in Claimant’s other argument,

A: holding that duress toll to statute of limitations under state law had no application to federal rico statute of limitations
B: holding under pre1994 law that statute of limitations does not allow party to avoid obligation to comply with previous order
C: holding that an administrative agency is not subject to a contempt proceeding for failure to comply with an order
D: holding court will not process or decide the merits of any case on appeal that does not comply with the statute
B.