With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 88 S.Ct. 1868. For example, in United States v. Perez, 440 F.3d 363 (6th Cir.2006), the court held that police possessed reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle partly because its occupants committed similar acts at a hotel, such as swapping bags and briefly visiting rooms. Id. at 371-72. In Davis, the panel found that police permissibly stopped the defendant’s vehicle after observing the defendant leave a meeting with a known drug dealer carrying two suspicious packages. 430 F.3d at 354-55; see also United States v. Hill, 195 F.3d 258, 270-73 (6th Cir.1999) (concluding that eight factors, including a dubious explanation for a cross-country trip, nervousness, and the cash rental of a U-Haul, justified Ten-y detention); United States v. Erwin, 155 F.3d 818, 822 (6th Cir.1998) (en banc) (<HOLDING>). Although, as previous panels acknowledge, the

A: holding defendants nervousness in part presented officer with reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity
B: holding that while nervousness may be considered as part of the totality of circumstances nervousness standing alone was insufficient to expand a terry stop into an inquiry into drug activity
C: holding that reasonable suspicion existed based on defendants nervousness expired drivers license and suspicious story regarding travel plans
D: holding that eight factors including the drivers criminal record nervousness and lack of registration justified terry detention
D.