With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". § 243(4) ("Every court shall have power ... [t]o compel obedience to its judgments, orders, and process, and to the orders of a judge out of court, in all actions, or proceedings pending therein[.]”); 4 V.I.Code § 281(2) (“Every judicial officer shall have power ... [t]o compel obedience to his lawful orders!]]”); Young v. United States, 481 U.S. 787, 793, 107 S.Ct. 2124, 95 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987) (“[I]t is long settled that courts possess inherent authority to initiate contempt proceedings for disobedience to their orders....”). We have certiorari jurisdiction under 48 U.S.C. § 1613, which grants the Third Circuit certiorari jurisdiction to review final decisions of the Virgin Islands Supreme Court. See Kendall v. Daily News, 716 F.3d 82, No. 11-4162, 2013 WL 856433 (3d Cir. Mar. 8, 2013) (<HOLDING>). 4 . The ACLU, as amicus, argues that Kendall

A: holding that this court lacks jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the supreme court of the commonwealth of the northern mariana islands which were not completed before may 1 2004
B: holding that supreme court need not consider issue not raised in petition for certiorari
C: holding that congresss recent elimination of the third circuits certiorari jurisdiction over decisions of the virgin islands supreme court does not affect at a minimum certiorari petitions filed before the effective date of the jurisdictionstripping act
D: recognizing that where a state prisoner declines to pursue certiorari in the united states supreme court that petitioners conviction is not final  until  after the time for filing a petition for certiorari with the supreme court has passed
C.