With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (37) Photographs, 402 U.S. at 376, 91 S.Ct. at 1408). 25 . See Coil, 442 F.3d at 917 (stating that Stanley and its progeny, including Paris Adult Theatre I, ”uphold[] the constitutionality of the obscenity laws against attacks on both the First Amendment and substantive due process”); Extreme Assocs., Inc., 431 F.3d at 157 (rejecting the argument that Paris Adult The-atre I, Orito, and Reidel dealt only with a First, and not a Fourteenth, Amendment concept of privacy merely because the phrase "substantive due process” was not used in their holdings). 26 . 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 (2003). 34 . Because there is no constitutional right to sell obscene material, appellant's argument that such a right is "fundamental” fails. 27 . Id. at 578, 123 S.Ct. at 2483-84 (<HOLDING>). 28 . Id., 123 S.Ct. at 2484. 29 . Rodriguez

A: holding unconstitutional the texas statute criminalizing deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex
B: recognizing that a plaintiff can demonstrate that samesex harassment is because of sex by showing that the conduct was motivated by the coworkers sexual desire for persons of the same sex
C: recognizing the same rule in texas courts
D: holding that evidence was insufficient where the victim testified that she was awake and communicated her desire not to have sexual intercourse with the defendant
A.