With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court found — she was being monitored for the longstanding fibrocystic breast condition and not cancer during the pre-coverage period.”); Ross v. Western Fidelity Insurance Co., 881 F.2d 142, 144 (5th Cir.1989) (“[T]here is at least a reasonable argument that, under [a pre-existing condition exclusion], treatment for a specific condition cannot be received unless the specific condition is known.”); Van Volkenburg v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co., 971 F.Supp. 117, 122 (W.D.N.Y.1997) (finding reasonable the plaintiffs argument that to obtain advice or treatment regarding a medical “condition,” one must first have some awareness that the “condition” exists); see also In re Estate of Monica Ermenc v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 221 Wis.2d 478, 585 N.W.2d 679, 682 (1998) (<HOLDING>); Mannino v. Agway, Inc. Group Trust, 192

A: holding that where the claimants cancer was not evident as a condition before the coverage period began and where the symptoms before diagnosis were nonspecific coverage should not be excluded under the preexisting condition clause
B: holding that receiving advice or treatment during the exclusionary period for a condition which proves to be the same condition the claimant seeks benefits for qualifies as a preexisting condition regardless of whether there was an accurate diagnosis
C: holding that treatment for symptoms of undiagnosed multiple sclerosis activated the preexisting condition exclusion and stating that there is no requirement that a diagnosis definite or otherwise of the preexisting condition must be made during the preexisting condition period
D: holding that contracts for an indefinite period are excluded from the statutes coverage
A.