With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 316 (Ct.App.1983). {39} We find no abuse of discretion in this case. One of the State’s witnesses testified, without objection, about the presence of one gun in Munoz’s truck. The defense then cross-examined the witness on that subject, eliciting testimony that he was unaware of any other firearms in the truck and that the witness had not seen either Defendant go to the truck during the altercations. Only later, when a separate witness began to testify about his discovery of weapons in the truck, did the defense raise any objection. Because “the horse was already out of the barn” in regard to at least one gun in Munoz’s truck, Defendants’ objections were untimely and failed to preserve the issue for review on appeal. State v. Neswood, 2002-NMCA-081, ¶ 18, 132 N.M. 505, 51 P.3d 1159 (<HOLDING>). {40} Defendants did timely object to the

A: holding an objection untimely when raised after the testimony has been heard such that the issue would not be considered on appeal
B: holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
C: holding that an issue not raised on appeal is waived
D: holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal
A.