With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 1038, 1040 (9th Cir. 2000)). While we might hesitate to dismiss a meritorious case for failure to comply with Rule 28, N/S Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 127 F.3d 1145, 1146 (9th Cir.1997), Toroyan’s petition is not meritorious. The IJ offered specific and cogent reasons for disbelieving Toroyan’s claim that she suffered persecution on account of a protected ground. Gui v. INS, 280 F.3d 1217, 1225 (9th Cir.2002). For example, the IJ noted inconsistencies with respect to Toroyan’s position at the news station, and he pointed out several factual discrepancies regarding the alleged attacks on her husband and daughter. The IJ thus relied upon inconsistencies that are supported by the record and are significant to Toroyan’s asylum claim. Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 964 (9th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). PETITION DISMISSED. ** This disposition is

A: holding that an appeal is not moot so long as the appellate court can fashion relief that is both effective and equitable internal quotation marks omitted alteration in original
B: holding that the ijs adverse credibility determination must be upheld so long as one of the identified grounds is supported by substantial evidence and goes to the heart of the claim of persecution emphasis added
C: holding that the reviewing court must accept the adverse credibility finding so long as one of the identified grounds is supported by substantial evidence and goes to the heart of the petitioners claim of persecution internal quotation marks omitted first alteration in original
D: holding that in the absence of an adverse credibility determination the court must accept petitioners testimony as true
C.