With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". this case would be January 10, 2015. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 297. But because January 10th was a Saturday, the last day to file findings was actually Monday, January 12. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 4. 4 . See also Tex. Labor Code § 21.105 (defining “disability” as a "physical or mental condition that does not impair an individual’s ability to reasonably perform a job”); Tex. Transp. Code § 681.001(2) (" ‘Disability’ means a condition in which a person has ... mobility problems that substantially impair the person's ability to ambulate [or vision problems].”); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.022(a)(2) ("For the purposes of this sub-chapter, a person is under a legal disability if the person is ... (2) of unsound mind.... ”); see also 42 U.S.C 416, 420, 421 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2005, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Larry F. Smith, Inc. v. The Weber Co., Inc.,

A: holding that rule 18 granted a successor to a resigned judge the power to file findings when a case was transferred between districts
B: holding that neither rule 18 nor section 30002 allowed the successor to an electoral loser to file findings when the transition did not happen during the period in which the trial court was obligated to file findings
C: holding that rule 18 granted a successor to a deceased judge the power to file findings
D: holding that not even the successor to a retiring judge may file findings because retirement is not listed in rule 18 and has a statutorily distinct meaning from resignation
A.