With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". arguments concerning the very sentencing calculation issue for which he now seeks appellate review, and the probation officer prepared a supplemental report outlining and explaining the offense level computations of which all parties and the court were aware. Martinez-Jimenez has waived any challenge to the district court’s offense level calculation and appellate review is precluded. Id. at 923 (internal citations omitted). We agree. There can be no clearer “intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right,” Olano, 507 U.S. at 733, 113 S.Ct. 1770, than when the court brings the defendant’s prior objection to his attention, asks whether it has been resolved, and the defendant affirmatively indicates that it has, cf. United States v. Denkins, 367 F.3d 537, 543 (6th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Thompson, 289 F.3d 524, 527

A: holding that a psr objection was waived because having expressly raised this issue  defendant and his counsel then proceeded to abandon it
B: holding issue waived because it was not mentioned in brief but was only raised in notice of appeal
C: holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal
D: holding an issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal
A.