With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". only properly developed Thompson claim concerned the hospital’s rule for moving intravenous catheters. Mr. Edwards introduced evidence that a 48-hour rule was appropriate, but the hospital had adopted a different rule allowing catheters to be left in place for as long as 72 hours. R.R. 241a. This situation implicates not just an individual mistake, but the hospital’s “duty to formulate, adopt and enforce adequate rules and policies to ensure quality care for its patients.” Thompson, supra at 339-40, 591 A.2d at 707. If Mr. Edwards could prove that the 72-hour rule was inadequate, that the hospital should have known better, and that following this rule caused him harm, then he has made out a proper Thompson claim. The trial court apparently acknowledged that its negligence per se ruling (<HOLDING>) constituted negligence on the part of the

A: holding that department of health rules do not require agreement between two successive results
B: recognizing the 48hour standard as a department of health regulation
C: holding nonparty department of mental health had standing to appeal commitment order regarding person found not guilty by reason of insanity because department had direct interest that was affected by commitment order and because employees of the department conceivably could be held in contempt of court for failing to comply with the order
D: recognizing an individuals right of privacy in the content of health records and noting that health records are the property of the health care entity maintaining them
B.