With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and (3) resulting injury of the other party. See In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A, 52 S.W.3d 749, 758 (Tex.2001). Fraud and fraudulent inducement are separate causes of action that share the same elements. See id.; see also Haase v. Glazner, 62 S.W.3d 795, 798 (Tex.2001). Hoagland alleged in his live petition, in relevant part, that each appellee “made written and oral misrepresentations of material fact to [Hoagland] ... in Harris County, Texas ... via email and telephone conversations and in-person meetings ... with the intention that [Hoagland] would rely upon such misrepresentations and take action or refrain from taking certain actions within Harris County, Texas.” (Emphasis added.) Hoagland Holding, LLC, 324 S.W.3d 840, 847 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, Hoagland pleaded allegations

A: holding plaintiffs allegation that defendants committed torts in houston texas was sufficient to bring defendants under the longarm statute for plaintiffs claims of various forms of fraud and negligent misrepresentation
B: holding misrepresentation made by outofstate defendant to texas plaintiff who relied on it in texas satisfied requirement for jurisdiction under longarm statute based on commission of a tort in part in texas
C: holding plaintiffs allegation that defendants committed torts in texas was sufficient to bring defendants under the longarm statute
D: recognizing strong interest in protecting texas citizens where tort was committed in whole or in part in texas
C.