With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". are [1] whether the entity has authority to act with the sanction of government support, or [2] has any authority in law to make decisions, or [3] has substantial authority in the exercise of specific functions. In re Gideon, Inc., 158 B.R. 528, 531 (Bankr. S.D.Fla.1993) (footnotes omitted). 69 . The International Brominated Court seemed willing to entertain the notion that a private entity's mere "contractual relationship” with the federal government could make it a governmental entity and therefore perhaps an "agency” under the APA. 393 F.Supp.2d at 1380. But I have found no controlling authority to that effect. On the contrary, the case law I have examined appears to support the opposite conclusion. See United States v. Pa. Envtl. Hearing Bd., 584 F.2d 1273 (3d Cir.1978) (<HOLDING>); Mark v. Borough of Hatboro, 856 F.Supp. 966,

A: holding that there was no federal subject matter jurisdiction under the private cause of action provision of the act
B: holding that federal express despite the use of the word federal in its name is not a federal agency and therefore cannot be sued in this court
C: holding that a private company operating under a federal contract was not a federal department agency or instrumentality for the purposes of section 313 of the federal water pollution control act amendments of 1972
D: holding that just because a claim implicates a federal issue or involves construction of federal law does not necessarily give rise to a federal question and confer removal jurisdiction on a federal court
C.