With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". We disagree. Mariani presented evidence from which a reasonable jury could have concluded that BCBS dismissed her for her refusal to falsify accounting information. For instance, while she was working on the proposed merger between BCBS, Nevada Blue Cross and Blue Shield and New Mexico Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Mariani’s supervisor told her to identify benefits of the proposal. When she told her supervisor that she had tried to find benefits of the merger but was unable to do so, she testified that she was informed that she should not be working at BCBS. Taken in the light most favorable to Mariani, that evidence would indicate that she was directed to identify benefits of the merger plan or face job termination. She refused to agree to what 21 N.H. 915, 436 A.2d 1140, 1144 (1981) (<HOLDING>); Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 84 N.J.

A: holding that the court of appeals correctly stated the public policy exception but erroneously concluded that the exception did not apply
B: holding that public policy exception is not limited to legislative directives
C: recognizing the public interest exception
D: recognizing public policy exception to atwill doctrine
B.