With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and users. Id. at 123, 129. Similarly, in Penelas v. Arms Tech., Inc., No. 99-1941 CA-06, 1999 WL 1204353 (Fla.Cir.Ct. Dec. 13, 1999), the Mayor of Miami-Dade County brought an action against gun manufacturers, a gun distributor, and three trade associations, asserting various negligence claims and seeking to recover the costs incurred in providing police, fire, emergency, court, prison and other related services as a result of various homicidal, suicidal and accidental shootings in the county. Id. at *1. The court held that the county lacked standing because the damages were purely deriva tive of damages suffered by third parties and too remote to be recoverable. Id. at *2; see also Camden County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 123 F.Supp.2d 245, 257-58 (D.N.J.2000) (<HOLDING>); District of Columbia v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.,

A: holding direct testimony tying a defendant to a gun was not required when the gun was found in the defendants truck and when the defendant had both ammunition for the gun and a rack in which it could have been kept
B: holding that evidence of appellants prior gun possession was admissible in a homicide prosecution to show malice and intent possession of a gun without more is not wrongful conduct
C: holding that county lacked constitutional standing to assert against gun manufacturers negligence claims seeking compensation for manufacturers alleged reckless and negligent handgun marketing and distribution because its theory of causation involved a great number of links in the causal chain and county would have been required to show that causation was not severed by distributor retailer or purchaser illegal conduct or gun theft
D: holding a county and a road district had standing to sue state highway commission and county tax collector based on their interest in and control over the public roads of the county
C.