With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". § 18; Cal. Gov.Code § 3060; People v. Hulburt, 75 Cal.App.3d 404, 142 Cal.Rptr. 190, 193 (1977). While this factor may be of somewhat limited weight because a state court appoints the prosecutor to conduct the impeachment proceedings, see Weiner, 210 F.3d at 1030, it nonetheless weighs toward the conclusion that the sheriff acts for the county when investigating crime as well as when administering the jails. Finally, as we noted in Streit, California Government Code section 25303 grants the county board of supervisors supervisory authority over all county officers, including sheriffs, and places a duty on the board of supervisors to “see that [county officers] faithfully perform their duties.” Cal. Gov.Code § 25303; see also Dibb v. County of San Diego, 884 P.2d 1003, 1009 (in bank) (<HOLDING>). Only one provision of the California

A: holding that the grant county prosecutor had a statutory duty to be legal advisor to the county clerk even though she was not embroiled in litigation in which the county was the real party in interest
B: holding that members of the board of trustees of an elementary school had standing to challenge the actions of the county board of education because they suffered an actual injury when the county board nullified their unanimous vote to reject a candidate for principal of the elementary school
C: holding that plaintiffs failure to allege compliance with these statutes did not bar his claim against members of county board of supervisors as individuals for illegal expenditures of public funds
D: holding that under section 25303 the board of supervisors has a statutory duty to supervise the conduct of all county officers
D.