With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. See Dickerson v. Feldman, 426 F.Supp.2d 130 (S.D.N.Y.2006) (<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ.,

A: holding where plaintiffs stake in controversy disappears before there has been effort to certify class action the action must be dismissed
B: holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to certify class action when claims were so individualized that certification was improper
C: holding that because no class was certified at the time the individual claims were dismissed the class action was properly dismissed
D: holding that a class action is not mooted by the intervening resolution of the controversy as to the named plaintiffs
A.