With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in the debtor’s name on the UCC financing statement coversheets resulted in plaintiffs being treated as an unsecured creditor and “forced” plaintiff to engage in unnecessary costly litigation to defend its security interest. Resolution of plaintiffs contention is aided by clarifying the function of a financing statement and a security agreement. {¶ 40} “The function of a financing statement is to give notice to interested third parties that the person filing it may have a security interest in the property of the debtor named therein.” (Emphasis added.) Natl. Bank of Fulton Cty. v. Haupricht Bros., Inc. (1988), 55 Ohio App.3d 249, 255, 564 N.E.2d 101, 14 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 215; in accord, Silver Creek Supply v. Powell (1987), 36 Ohio App.3d 140, 146, 521 N.E.2d 828, 6 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 239 (<HOLDING>). The propriety of the financing statement is

A: holding that a trial judge has unquestionable authority to withdraw an order of dismissal that has not been fully perfected by filing
B: holding that the secured creditor was only entitled to the amount of its claim as provided in the debtors chapter 13 plan when the destruction of the vehicle yielded insurance proceeds greater than the secured creditors claim
C: holding the basic purpose of a financing statement is to provide notice to outside creditors that a secured claim has been perfected
D: holding that a financing statement contained a sufficient description of farm equipment and machinery so as to give the holder of the perfected security interest priority over a mechanics lien
C.