With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that is unwarranted.”). The “lodestar” is no longer a lodestar in the true sense of the word- — “a star that leads,” Webster’s Third International Dictionary 1329 (1981). Nor do courts use it in the way the term was first used by the Third Circuit — as a base amount that is susceptible of ready adjustment; rather, circuit court deference to the district court’s estimate of a “reasonable” hourly rate is a “lodestar” only in the sense that it is a guiding jurisprudential principle, see Dague, 505 U.S. at 562, 112 S.Ct. 2638 (“The ‘lodestar’ figure has, as its name suggests, become the guiding light of our fee-shifting jurisprudence.”). What the district courts in this circuit produce is in effect not a lodestar as originally conceived, but rather a “presumptively reasonable fee.” See id. (<HOLDING>). The focus of the district courts is no longer

A: holding that the fee applicant bears the burden of  documenting the appropriate hours expended and hourly rates
B: holding that the fee applicant bears the burden of showing that  an adjustment is necessary to the determination of a reasonable fee 
C: holding that where a contract for legal services fails to expressly provide for the amount of the fee a reasonable fee is implied
D: holding that the plaintiff bears the burden of showing that he has standing for each type of relief sought
B.