With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the managerial representative of court employees and the retention of authority to supervise and discharge such employees in light of Section 1620 of the County Code, Act of August 9, 1955, P.L. 323, as amended, 16 P.S. § 1620. Id. at 437-38, 388 A.2d at 734-35. This case deals with deputy sheriffs who are appointed by the Sheriff and it is the Sheriff that retains the authority to select, discharge and supervise which is protected from contractual impairment under Section 1620 without his consent. Erie County v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 908 A.2d 369, 375-76 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006), appeal denied, 591 Pa. 738, 921 A.2d 498 (2007). Such authority cannot be impaired under Act 111 as well. See Westmoreland County v. Westmoreland County Detectives, 937 A.2d 618, 622-23 (Pa.Cmwlth.2007)(<HOLDING>). DISSENTING OPINION BY Judge BROBSON. The

A: holding a county and a road district had standing to sue state highway commission and county tax collector based on their interest in and control over the public roads of the county
B: holding that act 111 interest arbitrator exceeded his power and jurisdiction in issuing an award requiring just cause for firing and discipline of detectives as it infringed on the district attorneys retained right to control the discharge and supervision of his detectives under section 1620 of the county code
C: holding that a court reviewing an arbitrators award in an act 111 grievance arbitration involves questions regarding 1 the jurisdiction of the arbitrator 2 the regularity of the proceedings 3 an excess of the arbitrators powers and 4 deprivation of constitutional rights
D: holding that upon vacating an arbitration award the court has the discretion to remand to the same arbitrator or different arbitrator
B.