With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". right to extend loans in its “sole discretion” (Def.’s Ex. E, ¶ 1), TSN expressly waived “demand, presentment, notice, protest, and notice of dishonor” (Def.’s Ex. B), and TSN was obligated to “pay on demand” any balances due under the agreements (Def.’s Ex. B). In light of these express contractual provisions, Presidential may not be held liable merely for slowing the rate at which it advanced money to TSN, reducing the outstanding balance of TSN’s debt, or declining to advance additional funds after February 19, 1993. See Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Miller, 415 Mass. 482, 614 N.E.2d 668, 669 (1993) (“[G]ood faith is not a necessary component of a holder’s decision to collect the balance due on a demand note.”); Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Wayman, 34 Mass.App.Ct. 20, 606 N.E.2d 925, 928 (1993) (<HOLDING>). However, TSN’s claims appear less directed

A: holding that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is limited to performance under a contract
B: recognizing cause of action for implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in atwill employment contract
C: holding that covenant of good faith and fair dealing does not require lender to provide notice concerning loans to individual who expressly waived notice in contract
D: holding where parties had not reached a binding contract the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing did not apply
C.