With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". waived his right to appeal his resulting sentence based on his status as an armed career criminal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s sentence. 1 . The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 2 . Orozco initially objected to the determination that these two convictions, entered on the same day, were two separate convictions under the ACCA. However, he withdrew this objection at sentencing. 3 . Even if Orozco had not waived this argument, the district court did not plainly err in sentencing him as an armed career criminal because his prior convictions for felony lascivious acts with a child constitute violent felonies under the ACCA and the sentencing guidelines. See United States v. Rodriguez, 979 F.2d 138, 141 (8th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Eastin, 445 F.3d

A: holding that an aliens conviction for criminally negligent child abuse under colorado law for leaving a child unattended in abathtub did not constitute a crime of violence
B: holding that under iowa code  7098 the offense of lascivious acts with a child was a crime of violence because it involved a substantial risk that physical force would be used against the child victim in the course of committing the offense
C: holding that a conviction under colorevstat  186401 for criminally negligent child abuse was not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16a because physical force was not an element of that crime
D: holding that a conviction for a lascivious act with a child in violation of iowa code  7098 was a crime of violence
D.