With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, 69, 93 S.Ct. 2628, 2641, 37 L.Ed.2d 446 (1973); Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 486, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1309, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957); see Miller, 413 U.S. at 23, 93 S.Ct. at 2614 ("This much has been categorically settled by the Court, that obscene material is unprotected by the First Amendment.”). 12 . United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8mm. Film, 413 U.S. 123, 128, 93 S.Ct. 2665, 2669, 37 L.Ed.2d 500 (1973); United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs, 402 U.S. 363, 376, 91 S.Ct. 1400, 1408, 28 L.Ed.2d 822 (1971); United States v. Coil, 442 F.3d 912, 916 (5th Cir.2006), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 1326, 167 L.Ed.2d 86 (2007) (No. 06-980); see also T.K.’s Video, Inc. v. State, 891 S.W.2d 287, 289 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1994, pet. ref'd) (<HOLDING>). 13 . United States v. Reidel, 402 U.S. 351,

A: holding that while an individual has a right to possess obscene material in the privacy of his home there is no corresponding privacy right to purchase such material
B: holding that constitutional right of privacy does not apply to medical records
C: holding that constitutionallyprotected right to possess obscene material in the privacy of the home does not require that the court fashion or recognize a constitutional right for commercial purveyors of obscene material to distribute or sell it
D: holding that new york law has no common law right of privacy embracmg such claims as false light as any such privacy right is purely statutory
A.