With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". unimaginable that all government agencies would be required to provide a hearing before they take any action that is arguably inconsistent with a contract.” Id.; see, e.g., S & D Maintenance Co. v. Goldin, 844 F.2d 962, 966 (2d Cir.1988) (“An interest in enforcement of an ordinary commercial contract with a state is qualitatively different from the interests the Supreme Court has thus far viewed as ‘property’ entitled to procedural due process protection.”); Suburban Mortg. Assocs. v. Dep’t of Housing & Urban Dev., 480 F.3d 1116, 1128 (Fed.Cir.2007) (“A claim that a government agency has violated a party’s right to due process by refusing performance under a contract is substantively indistinguishable from a breach of contract claim.”); Roth v. King, 449 F.3d 1272, 1284 (D.C.Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>); Redondo-Borges v. HUD, 421 F.3d 1, 10 (1st

A: holding that there is no federal or colorado constitutional right to postconviction counsel but there is a limited statutory right
B: holding that there is no due process right to appellate review
C: holding that there is no valid property right for lawyers previously serving as public defenders to continue doing so
D: holding that there is no constitutional right to appeal a criminal conviction
C.