With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 701, which states: If a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is: (a) rationally based on the witness’s perception; (b) helpful to clearly understanding the witness’s testimony or to determining a fact in issue; and (c) not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702. Pa.R.E. 701. A. Dr. McClellan According to- Appellants, Dr. McClellan rendered an expert opinion on causation even though he was not identified as an expert. See Appellants’ Br. at 10-12 (citing in support Pa.R.C.P. 4003.5 (requiring pre-trial disclosure of experts and expert reports “acquired or developed in anticipation of litigation or for trial”); Sindler v. Goldman, 309 Pa.Super. 7, 454 A.2d 1054, 1057 (1982) (<HOLDING>)). Dr. McClellan is a physician specializing in

A: holding that substantial compliance with notice is sufficient
B: holding that strict compliance is not required
C: recognizing rule
D: recognizing that compliance with rule 40035 is critical to prevent unfair surprise
D.