With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". cause under collective bargaining agreement "have a sufficient property interest in continued employment to warrant due process protection prior to termination" (quoting Storrs v. Municipality of Anchorage, 721 P.2d 1146, 1148 (Alaska 1986))); see also Gilbert v. Homar, 520 U.S. 924, 928-29, 117 S.Ct. 1807, 138 L.Ed.2d 120 (1997) ("[We have previously held that public employees who can be discharged only for cause have a constitutionally protected property interest in their tenure and cannot be fired without due process."). Jurgens also asserts that he was only a few months away from vesting in the public employees' retirement system. 51 . DeNuptiis v. Unocal Corp., 63 P.3d 272, 280 n. 26 (Alaska 2003); see also Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 701-02, 96 S.Ct 1155, 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976) (<HOLDING>). 52 . We therefore reject Jurgens's argument

A: holding that a prison grievance procedure is not a substantive right and does not give rise to a protected liberty interest requiring the procedural protections envisioned by the fourteenth amendment
B: recognizing first amendment and fourteenth amendment interests in inmate correspondence
C: holding that reputation alone does not implicate any liberty or property interests sufficient to trigger procedural protections of fourteenth amendment
D: holding that damage to reputation alone does not trigger due process protections for purposes of 42 usc  1983
C.