With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". dispute, even though the CPT codes were referenced in the responses, to him. Helton, 709 F.3d at 352. He submitted no additional information to support this claim and made no claim or case that Michelin should cast aside the CPT codebook and classify the musculo-skeletal steroid knee injections as an “office visit” or routine non-surgical injection, rather than as an “office surgery” procedure. There is likewise nothing in the administrative record that would have placed Michelin on notice that it needed to solicit more medical records or medical opinions after it confirmed that the codes submitted were correct, or that would have otherwise placed a burden upon it -to question the provider’s coding decision. Cf. Harrison v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 773 F.3d 15, 20 (4th Cir. 2014) (<HOLDING>). In sum, Michelin relied upon the industry

A: holding that plan administrator of an erisa health plan did not have to anticipate the confusion of a plan participant
B: holding that a payment is under the plan when the debt is provided for in the plan
C: holding that plan language giving plan administrator power to determine which employees are eligible to participate in the plan and providing all parties dealing with the plan an interpretation of plan provisions on request indicates deferential standard of review of trustee eligibility decisions
D: holding that the plan administrator failed to meet its plan obligations when it chose to remain willfully blind to readily available medical information where the plan beneficiary had placed them on notice of the existence of such information
D.