With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". could not have been convicted under subsection (a) (1), for at the time of his crime, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 53-21 (1996) did not contain subparts (a) and (b). See Note 2, supra. 10 . Although the IJ did not cite specifically to subsection (b) of § 16, it is apparent from his reference to violence as "inherent” in the crime of risk of injury to a minor that he was relying on subsection (b). Additionally, as discussed below, the Connecticut Supreme Court has held that physical force is not a required element of the offense of risk of injury to a minor under Conn. Gen.Stat. § 53-21. See State v. Rivera, 260 Conn. 486, 492, 798 A.2d 958 (2002). Thus, it would not constitute a "crime of violence” under the definition in § 16(a). See also In re Sweetser, 22 I. & N. Dec. 709 (BIA 1999)(en banc)(<HOLDING>). 11 . In Taylor, the Supreme Court addressed

A: holding that an aliens psas conviction was not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16a that would render the alien removable as an aggravated felon
B: holding that a conviction under colorevstat  186401 for criminally negligent child abuse was not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16a because physical force was not an element of that crime
C: holding that an aliens conviction for criminally negligent child abuse under colorado law for leaving a child unattended in abathtub did not constitute a crime of violence
D: holding that sexual assault of a child qualified as crime of violence under 18 usc  16
B.