With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". which do not implicate the First Amendment right to gather news. The Defendant cannot make such a showing; accordingly the motion to quash must be granted. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Dade County, Florida, this 16th day of July, 1986. 1 Defendant did not cite any Florida civil case in which a subpoena to a non-party journalist has been enforced. See Woods v. Lutheran Inner City Center, 10 Fla. Supp. 2d 32 (4th Judicial Circuit 1985); 11 Med. L. Rptr. 1776, 1776 (Fla. 4th Cir. 1985). 2 See Tribune Co. v. Huffsteddler, 11 Fla. L. W. 246 (June 6, 1986); Morgan v. State, 337 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 1976) (reporter’s contempt conviction for refusal to testify before a grand jury reversed), Miller v. Transamerican Press, 621 F.2d 721, modified on rehearing 628 F.2d 932 (Fifth Cir. 1980)

A: recognizing a qualified privilege for confidential sources in a libel suit
B: recognizing qualified privilege for confidential presidential communications
C: recognizing qualified privilege protecting confidential communications among judges and their staffs in the performance of their judicial duties
D: recognizing qualified privilege for government files relating to an ongoing criminal investigation
A.