With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". paid to reduce prejudgment interest. Brainard v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co., 216 S.W.3d 809, 816 (Tex.2006); see also Battaglia v. Alexander, 177 S.W.3d 893, 904-12 (Tex.2005). B. Analysis We agree with Hudspeth that prejudgment interest should have been calculated beginning six months after Enterprise received the April 7, 2006 written notice of her claim. “The prejudgment interest statute does not set forth requirements for what constitutes adequate ‘written notice of a claim’ ” sufficient to trigger the 180-day period before prejudgment interest begins accruing. Robinson v. Brice, 894 S.W.2d 525, 528 (Tex.App.-Austin 1995, writ denied). Texas courts have held, however, that a written notice that an injured party is seeking specific compensation for a specific injury is enough. Id. (<HOLDING>); see also Brookshire Grocery Co. v. Smith, 99

A: holding that wife was entitled to prejudgment interest on alimony and child support arrearages from the date those payments were due
B: holding that the date of the federal indictment not the date of the state arrest was the triggering date for the speedytrial act
C: holding that interest does not begin to accrue until the date of judgment not the date of verdict
D: holding trial court erred in calculating prejudgment interest from date lawsuit filed rather than date that insurer received letter from insured requesting certain attached medical bills be reimbursed and lost wages be paid
D.