With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". disqualification of [the] entire law firm simply because one member of [the] firm previously represented [a] client who is now an adversary of [a] client currently represented by [the] firm." 7 Am.Jur.2d Attorneys at Law § 198 (2005) (citing Kala v. Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co., Inc., 81 Ohio St.3d 1, 688 N.E.2d 258 (1998)). 9 . Plaintiffs might disagree with the phrase "heavily involved,” to the extent that Plaintiffs state that Wilson's involvement in Defendants' cases was limited to a "secretarial role.” Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Disqualify, p. 6, ¶ 11. However, even assuming her role as a paralegal would be more aptly termed secretarial, that would not make her any less "heavily involved” under the law. See e.g., Zimmerman, 270 Kan. at 822, 19 P.3d 784 (<HOLDING>). If the matters are substantially related, as

A: holding that access to confidential information didnt transform janitorial staff into confidential employees under branti
B: holding that a person violates  10b and rule 10b5 when he misappropriates confidential information  in breach of a duty owed to the source of the information
C: holding that the use of a chinese wall could not be used to screen a secretary when she possessed confidential information
D: holding that plaintiff could state a claim for conversion of confidential information
C.