With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". assert, there is no difference, under the circumstances of the case at bar, between a false imprisonment and false arrest claim, the inclusion of both theories in the complaint will make no difference. If, on the other hand, there is a difference, then plaintiffs are entitled to assert both claims. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(e)(2) (authorizing alternative claims, and alternative statements of claims, regardless of consistency). The motion to dismiss the false arrest claim will be denied. IX Finally, the City challenges plaintiffs’ claim for an award of punitive damages against the City, noting that punitive damages are not available against a city under the relevant federal or state law. See e.g., City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc., 453 U.S. 247, 101 S.Ct. 2748, 69 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981) (<HOLDING>); § 768.28(5), Fla. Stat. (indicating that

A: holding that punitive damages are not recoverable against municipalities in actions brought pursuant to 42 usc  1983
B: holding that punitive damages are not recoverable under viwda
C: holding that punitive damages are recoverable in a claim for retaliation under the flsa
D: holding that punitive damages are not recoverable against municipalities under  1988
D.