With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". objected to Penn's proof of claim and, therefore, the claim has been allowed. See 11 U.S.C. § 502(a). The notes attached to the proof of claim are dated between May 22, 1997 and September 27, 2000. Since the last note signed was apparently for the 2000-01 academic year, it is reasonable to infer from the documents attached to the proof of claim that t 538 (Bankr. D.Mass.2005) (concluding that university’s act of refusing to allow chapter 7 debtor from registering for class and from graduation was both violation of the automatic stay and the discharge injunction); In re Walker, 336 B.R. 534, 536 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2005) (considering whether private university violated 11 U.S.C. §§ 362 and 525 by withholding chapter 13 debtor's transcript); In re Reese, 38 B.R. 681, 683 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1984) (<HOLDING>); In re Ware, 9 B.R. 24, 25 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.1981)

A: holding  525 applies only where debt dischargeable
B: holding that when a state court judgment was found not to be dischargeable under 11 usc  523a6 the associated attorneys fees were also not dischargeable
C: holding that state university violated 11 usc  362 and 525 by withholding debtors transcript where debt was dischargeable
D: holding that university violated automatic stay by withholding chapter 13 debtors student transcript but that such action at bar did not rise to the level of contempt
C.