With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to prove the same will amount to a fatal variance and a violation of the defendant’s right to due process of law.” However, as the Supreme Court of Georgia has long held, [t]he general rule that allegations and proof must correspond is based upon the obvious requirements (1) that the accused shall be definitely informed as to the charges against him, so that he may be enabled to present his defense and not be taken by surprise by the evidence offered at the trial; and (2) that he may be protected against another prosecution for the same offense. As the trial court’s charge on the use of a knife as a deadly weapon pointed out, whether Quiroz’s use of the knife made it a deadly weapon was for the jury to decide. But the part of the indictment unsupported by the evidence in this case (<HOLDING>) was an “unnecessary [specification] of a[

A: holding that variance between indictment alleging that defendant held knife to victims neck and proof that defendant only pointed knife at victim was not fatal to conviction for aggravated assault
B: holding that the officer acted reasonably in shooting the decedent where the plaintiff did not directly counter the defendants evidence showing that the decedent matched the description of a suspect who threatened a victim with a knife was armed with a knife and ignored the officers instructions to drop it and jabbed it at the officer while taking steps toward him
C: holding that a drivers knowledge that there are concealable weapons in the car available for the drivers use is evidence of possession
D: holding a knife to the drivers neck
D.