With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". loss of one’s enjoyment of life continues to be an area of confusion in the state of Mississippi. The issue to be decided here is whether our state will or will not recognize this type of recovery in a personal injury action, and if so to what extent? Jurisdictions around the country have chosen either; 1) not to recognize the loss of enjoyment of life, 2) recognize the loss of enjoyment of life as a completely separate element considered in addition to pain and suffering, or 3) recognize the loss of enjoyment of life but only as integrated into pain and suffering. See e.g., Elliott v. United States, 877 F.Supp. 1569 (M.D.Ga.1992); Loth v. Truck-A-Way Corp., 60 Cal.App.4th 757, 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 571 (1998); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Von Stetina, 474 So.2d 783, 792 (Fla.1985)(<HOLDING>); Brookshire Bros., Inc. v. Wagnon, 979 S.W.2d

A: holding that prejudgment interest may properly be added to damage awards for past lost wages medical expenses that have been incurred and past pain and suffering but not future loss of earnings future medical expenses andor future pain and suffering
B: holding that claims for pain and suffering are the separate property of a spouse
C: holding that pain and suffering does not survive the death of the injured
D: recognizing as separate from pain and suffering
D.