With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the majority chooses the ax over the scalpel. In my view the compelling interest standard should not be extended so greatly as to include records filed with pretrial discovery-related motions or to attachments that have no relevance to the matter. ¶45 The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has thoughtfully dealt with the issue of sealing records in pretrial discovery motions and correctly concluded that “there is a presumptive right to public access to all material filed in connection with nondiscovery pretrial motions, whether these motions are case dispositive or not, but no such right as to discovery motions and their supporting documents.” Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Techs., Inc., 998 F.2d 157, 165 (3d Cir. 1993). Accord Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 805 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1986) (<HOLDING>); Hammock ex rel. Hammock v. Hoffmann-LaRoche,

A: recognizing common law right of access to judicial documents
B: holding that there is a presumptive common law right to public access to all material filed in connection with nondiscovery pretrial motions  but no such right as to discovery motions and their supporting documents
C: recognizing a right of access to civil proceedings
D: holding that there is no right of public access to documents considered in civil discovery motions
D.