With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of lewd or lascivious molestation, when he was actually convicted of two counts of lewd or lascivious molestation and one count of lewd or lascivious exhibition, and that the written judgment and sentence noted appellant, on the lewd or lascivious exhibition count, violated subsection 800.04(7)(c), Florida Statutes (2013), when appellant actually violated subsection 800.04(7)(b), Florida Statutes. However, because this case is being remanded for resentencing, a new order of probation and judgment and sentence will be entered. 2 . When originally sentencing appellant, the court ordered a lump sum of court costs without giving appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding the discretionary costs. That was improper. Giles v. State, 103 So.3d 1058, 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)

A: holding that if claim is not an allowed secured claim pursuant to section 506a by its terms section 1325a5b is inapplicable
B: holding that a defendant claiming immunity pursuant to section 7760321 florida statutes must file a motion to dismiss pursuant to florida rule of criminal procedure 3190b and requiring trial court to address the motion at a pretrial evidentiary hearing
C: holding a fine pursuant to section 775083 was discretionary and because it and its accompanying surcharge pursuant to section 93804 were not specifically announced during the sentencing hearing they should be stricken
D: holding bankruptcy courts are not listed in section 451 and it is indisputable that as presently constituted they are not article iii courts and therefore lack jurisdiction to award fees pursuant to 28 usc section 2412d1a
C.