With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". co-conspirators known to the grand jury, but these names ... were later set forth in a bill of particulars.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1035, 121 S.Ct. 623, 148 L.Ed.2d 533 (2000); United States v. Sims, 156 F.3d 1233, 1998 WL 415997, *2 (6th Cir.1998) (table op.) (“In response to defendant’s request for a bill of particulars, the district court ordered the government to provide defendant with the names of the known, unindicted co-conspirators alluded to in the indictment.”); United States v. Newton, 2002 WL 122911, *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2002) (“It is beyond dispute that this Court has the authority, in its discretion, to order the government to disclose the identities of known unin-dicted co-conspirators. See, e.g., United States v. Nachamie, 91 F.Supp.2d 565, 572 [ (S.D.N.Y.2000) ] (<HOLDING>); United States v. Gotti, 784 F.Supp. 1017,

A: recognizing that the second circuit has affirmed both the grant and the denial of requests for disclosure of the names of unindicted coconspirators
B: holding that the standard of review for the denial of rule 11 sanctions is governed by the law of the regional circuit
C: recognizing that no federal circuit has addressed the issue
D: recognizing of course the suspension of the imposition of sentence and the grant of probation
A.