With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". plaintiff has not adequately alleged a conspiracy, nor has plaintiff put forth evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact that a conspiracy existed. In fact, plaintiff has failed to identify the purported members of the conspiracy. Plaintiff cannot simply make a conclusory allegation that a conspiracy existed; rather, plaintiff must provide facts showing agreement and concerted action. Sooner Prods. Co. v. McBride, 708 F.2d 510, 512 (10th Cir.1983). In this case, plaintiffs allegation of a conspiracy, without more, is insufficient to state a claim for conspiracy. Plaintiff has failed to allege any facts tending to show agreement or concerted action. The court finds that plaintiffs § 1985(3) claim fails as a maicer of law. Clulow v. Oklahoma, 700 F.2d 1291, 1303 (10th Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>). D. Municipal Liability Plaintiff also alleges

A: holding conclusory assertions of intent to cause insufficient without supporting facts
B: holding that vague conclusory statements are insufficient
C: holding that conclusory allegations without supporting factual averments are insufficient to state a claim on which relief can be based citations omitted
D: holding that conclusory allegation of conspiracy without supporting factual averments insufficient to state claim
D.