With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by our predecessor court that had, in turn, relied on earlier decisions, such as Application of Musgrave, 57 C.C.P.A. 1352, 431 F.2d 882, 893 (CCPA 1970), suggesting that a process of human thinking in and of itself could be patentable. 12 . Of course, process clai that the transformation of data ... by a machine through a series of mathematical calculations into a final share price, constitutes a practical application of a mathematical algorithm.” (emphases added)); Alappat, 33 F.3d at 1544 ("This is not a disembodied mathematical concept which may be characterized as an 'abstract idea,' but rather a specific machine to produce a useful, concrete, and tangible result." (emphases added)); Arrhythmia Research Tech., Inc. v. Corazonix Corp., 958 F.2d 1053, 1058-59 (Fed.Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). 15 . In Musgrave, our predecessor court

A: holding electronic home monitoring is not time spent in custody because there is a difference in restrictions between electronic home monitoring and jail
B: holding trial court lacked authority to impose electronic monitoring condition and deleting the provision as a condition of applicants deferred adjudication probation
C: holding that receiving advice or treatment during the exclusionary period for a condition which proves to be the same condition the claimant seeks benefits for qualifies as a preexisting condition regardless of whether there was an accurate diagnosis
D: holding patentable a method for analyzing electrocardiograph signals for the detection of a specific heart condition that used electronic equipment programmed to perform mathematical computation
D.