With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". such issue sna sponte. 3 Estate of Imamura, P. Action No. 89-1009 (N.M.I. Super. Ct. Feb. 17, 1995) (decision and order granting petition for partial distribution at 3). 4 Although not mentioned by the Superior Court or any of the parties in this action, the Superior Court had previously found § 2411 to be unconstitutional. Estate ofTudela, Civ. Action No. 86-884 (N.M.I. Super. Ct. May 22,1992) (Order at 8,9. and 10). rev’d on other grounds, 4 N.M.I. 1 (1993), appeal dismissed, No. 93-16486 (9th Cir. Nov. 18, 1994). However, the constitutionality of § 2411 is not before us today. In Estate of Tudela, the court stated: In reality, section 2411 is an effort to amend the Constitution without following the proper procedure ... . In operation, 8 CMC § 2411 woul High Ct., Tr. Div. 1962) (<HOLDING>); Estate of Cabrera. 2 N.M.I. 195, 203-04

A: holding that trial court did not err in basing decision on local customary law rather than common law
B: holding that trial court did not err in applying common law but noting that chamorro customary law also could have been applied
C: holding that common law review of a licensing decision was sufficient
D: holding that the trial court did not err by granting defendants motion for summary judgment
A.