With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of documents from debtor. I am unable to determine specifically what documents were produced because the bank has failed to detail the contents of the records it received from debtor. Nor did the bank provide any expert testimony that Wazeter’s financial history could not be constructed from the records he provided. See In re Wynn, 205 B.R. 97, 101 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1997) (denying summary judgment and noting that the creditor had failed to present evidence that creditors were unable to ascertain the debtor’s financial condition from the debtor’s existing records) (citing In re Dolin, 799 F.2d 251, 253 (6th Cir.1986)). I acknowledge that various cases have suggested that certain categories of information may be essential to determining a debtor’s history. See In re Juzwiak, 89 F.3d at 428 (<HOLDING>); In re Pulos, 168 B.R. 682 (holding that

A: holding that chaotic and piecemeal records were insufficient to determine financial history
B: holding that records relating to a student court were not education records
C: holding that an automobiles title history was admissible under the public records exception
D: holding a court may consider a defendants criminal history even if that history is included in the defendants criminal history category
A.