With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". contacts with the United States as a whole to establish this Court’s personal jurisdiction over Total. When enacting RICO, “Congress provided for service of process upon RICO defendants residing outside the federal court’s district when it is shown that ‘the ends of justice’ require it.” Butcher’s Union Local No. 498, United Food and Commercial Workers v. SDC Investment, Inc., 788 F.2d 535, 538 (9th Cir.1986) (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 1965(b)). For nationwide service of process to be imposed under section 1965(b), the court must have personal jurisdiction over at least one of the participants in the alleged multidistrict conspiracy and the plaintiff must show that there is no other district in which a court will have personal jurisdiction over all of the alleged coconspirators. Id. at 539 (<HOLDING>). The Court need not consider whether these

A: holding that plaintiff had standing to bring a rico conspiracy claim despite his inability to bring a substantive rico claim
B: holding that speedy trial act requires that an ends of justice continuance be specifically limited in time
C: holding ends of justice provision was intended to enable plaintiffs to bring all members of nationwide rico conspiracy before a court in a single trial
D: holding that plaintiffs cannot claim that a conspiracy to violate rico existed if they do not adequately plead a substantive violation of rico
C.