With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". The facts relative to this issue are not in dispute. The parties agree that Billy Cleveland was notified by letter of the reinsurance agreement in 1997, and that he was sent a “Certificate of Assumption” in March 1998, which recited that Central United had assumed all of Commonwealth’s contractual liabilities, and which advised Mr. Cleveland that from and after the date hereof, you should submit all claims under this Policy, whenever incurred, and all premiums due under this Policy, to Central United, and further advised that “Central United will be responsible for all liabilities related to the policies and for all administrative services related to the policies.” And it appears agreed that after receipt of the Ce rd Life Ins. Co., 19 Wis.2d 426, 435, 120 N.W.2d 687, 692 (1963) (<HOLDING>). However, this court cannot conclude with the

A: holding liability could not be transferred to the fund where the certificate of insurance was not signed
B: holding that the proceeds of a liability insurance policy were not property of the estate
C: holding that insureds retention of original insurance policy accompanied by silence after receiving certificate of assumption and his payment to reinsurer of 15 premiums after notification of transfer of liability by reinsurer constituted an acceptance of the assumption agreement
D: recognizing that production of a written insurance policy was unnecessary to prove the existence of the policy because the proof required was proof of the fact of insurance and not of the contents of a writing
C.