With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 522, 72 S.Ct. 509, 511-12, 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952) (footnote omitted). We, too, adhere to this doctrine “unequivocally established in United States v. Winter, 509 F.2d 975 (5th Cir.[1975]).” United States v. Darby, 744 F.2d 1508, 1530 (11th Cir.1984). “[W]e are convinced that ... a defendant in a federal criminal trial whether citizen or alien, whether arrested within or beyond the territory of the United States may not successfully challenge the District Court’s jurisdiction over his person on the grounds that his presence before the Court was unlawfully secured.... [T]he Supreme Court has not receded from Ker or Frisbie, and nei ther has this Court.” Winter, 509 F.2d at 985-87 (footnotes omitted); see also Remeta v. Singletary, 85 F.Sd 513, 518-19 (11th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, extradition procedures, even if

A: holding that the united states breach of the plea agreement releases the defendant from the appeal waiver
B: holding remedial in nature the interstate agreement on detainers act of 1965
C: holding that denying a pretransfer hearing to a defendant extradited under the interstate agreement on detainers in the absence of a waiver did not deprive the demanding state of jurisdiction to try him for murder
D: holding sixtonineday absence from ohio for vacation purposes does not rise to the level of an act engaging in interstate commerce mooting question of whether absence to attend college is interstate commerce
C.