With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (Tex.Crim.App.2004). 1. Questions reasonably related to administrative concerns The Muniz plurality held that questioning Muniz about his “name, address, height, weight, eye color, date of birth, and current age” was Miranda exempt because these questions were “reasonably related to the police’s administrative concerns.” Muniz, 496 U.S. at 601-02, 110 S.Ct. 2638. However, the Court has provided no definitive guidance on the scope of the exception. State and federal courts, including Texas’s intermediate courts, have since undertaken to identify what routine custodial questions are reasonably related to a legitimate administrative concern so to potentially fall within the exception’s parameters. See Townsend v. State, 813 S.W.2d 181, 186 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, pet. ref'd) (<HOLDING>). Conversely, courts have held that questions

A: holding that an officer may search a suspects vehicle incident to a lawful arrest
B: holding that questions regarding suspects name address weight height place of employment or physical disabilities normally attendant to arrest and custody
C: holding that an arrest may involve either 1 taking the alleged violator into exlended physical custody or 2 issuing the individual a citation and noting that when we use the word arrest in this opinion we refer to physical arrest
D: holding that arrest took place inside home even though officers did not physically enter residence to place suspect in custody
B.