With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Gen. Stat.] § 15A-926(b)(2).” However, at trial, Respondent did not object to joinder on this ground. Rather, Respondent argued that the incidents were diverse and that there was no indication that the same individuals were involved in all of the incidents. Therefore, Respondent failed to preserve the argument he now attempts to assert on appeal. See N.C.R. App. P. 10(b)(1) (stating that “[i]n order to preserve a question for appellate review, a party must have presented to the trial court a timely request, objection or motion, stating the specific grounds for the ruling the party desired the court to make if the specific grounds were not apparent from the context”); State v. Frye, 341 N.C. 470, 496, 461 S.E.2d 664, 677 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1123, 134 L. Ed. 2d 526 (1996) (<HOLDING>). However, even assuming arguendo that

A: holding that the defendant may not state one ground at trial and another on appeal
B: holding that claims based on grounds not objected to at trial cannot be considered on appeal
C: holding that the defendants objection was untimely and thus waived because the evidence to which he objected had already been presented to the jury
D: holding that the defendant objected to the evidence on only one ground thus he failed to preserve the additional grounds presented on appeal
D.