With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (S.D.Tex.2007) (citing Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass., 549 U.S. 365, 365, 127 S.Ct. 1105, 166 L.Ed.2d 956 (2007)). The Code requires the Debtor’s representative to appear at meetings of the creditors under 11 U.S.C. §§ 341 & 343 in order to obtain the most accurate information possible from the Debtor’s representative. See In re Moore, 309 B.R. 725, 726 (Bankr. N.D.Tex.2002) (noting that the meeting allows creditors to “rigorously question the debtor” and provide “valuable information regarding the debtor’s financial situation”); In re Shulund, 210 F.Supp. 195, 197 (D.C.Mont.1962) (acknowledging that a function of the examination at the creditors meeting is to “locate and protect the assets of the bankrupt’s estate”); In re E. Utils. Investing Corp., 98 F.2d 620, 622 (3d Cir.1938) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, because Bankruptcy Rule 9001(5)

A: holding that preservation of error in the trial court is not necessary as to lack of standing
B: holding that preservation of the specific argument in support of the ground for reversal is required for appellate review
C: recognizing that there is an important privacy interest in corporate financial documents the court agrees that the information can be protected therefore the court  required that the information be disclosed pursuant to a confidentiality order only to be used in connection with this litigation
D: recognizing that the purpose is to afford  full information in connection with the estate  in order that the necessary steps may be taken for its preservation
D.