With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". but only in his capacity as manager of PBD. Noventa has not pointed us to a determination by any court that Pitts is the alter ego of PBD or that he should be held personally liable through the piercing of PBD’s corporate veil. The district court’s order granting a preliminary injunction is vacated and the action is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent 'with this opinion. VACATED AND REMANDED. 1 . Noventa filed its original complaint in the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, Florida. PBD and Pitts filed a notice of removal, alleging that diversity jurisdiction existed because they were both citizens of Tennessee, and Noventa was a citizen of Florida and California. See Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings, LLC, 374 F.3d 1020, 1022 (11th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). The parties do not challenge, and we find no

A: holding workers compensation insurer deemed by section 1332c to be citizen of state of which insured is citizen in suit brought by insureds injured employee
B: holding that police may approach citizen and ask that he roll down the window as long as the officers do not detain the citizen or create the impression that the citizen may not leave
C: holding that a limited liability company is a citizen of any state of which a member of the company is a citizen
D: holding that a joint stock company cannot be a citizen of new york within the meaning of the statutes regulating jurisdiction unless it be a corporation
C.