With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". N.E.2d 902 (2005). Defendant and the majority rely heavily on People v. Jenkins, 141 Ill. App. 3d 602, 490 N.E.2d 953 (1986), in support of their positions. In Jenkins, the Fourth District held that, generally, the proper remedy for a court’s failure to properly admonish a defendant about the possibility of restitution is to vacate the restitution order. Jenkins, 141 Ill. App. 3d 602, 490 N.E.2d 953. The line of cases behind the Jenkins decision treated a court’s guilty plea admonitions as implied promises between the court and a defendant. People v. Seyferlich, 398 Ill. App. 3d 989, 924 N.E.2d 1212 (2010). However, since Jenkins was decided, the Fourth District has not repeated the Jenkins holding based on the implied promise theory. Seyferlich, 398 Ill. App. 3d 989, 924 N.E.2d 1212 (<HOLDING>). I would not follow Jenkins but instead turn

A: recognizing that municipal corporations can include under the missouri constitution in addition to cities and towns counties school districts townships under township organization special road districts and drainage districts
B: recognizing potential viability of claims based on postapproval events
C: recognizing that the fourth districts decision in harris called into doubt the continued viability of jenkins
D: recognizing the districts duty of care for the protection of school children in its schools
C.