With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". found that Li failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution because she could safely relocate to another part of China. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(2)(ii). Indeed, Li testified that she moved to another province and encountered no problems there. Because the agency properly found that Li failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution, the agency properly denied her application for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b). Because Li was unable to show the objective likelihood of persecution needed to make out an asylum claim, she was necessarily unable to meet the higher standard required to succeed on a claim for withholding of removal or CAT relief. See Paul v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 148, 156 (2d Cir.2006); Kyaw Zwar Tun v. INS, 445 F.3d 554, 567 (2d Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). For the foregoing reasons, the petition for

A: holding that torture is something more severe than the kind of treatment that would suffice to prove persecution
B: holding something more than denial of receipt is required
C: holding that probable cause is something more than mere suspicion
D: holding that to constitute persecution harm must be more than harassment
A.