With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". heard p es for violations of § 6103, but no statutory provision requires the exclusion of evidence so obtained. 26 U.S.C. § 7431 (establishing a private right of action for civil damages against the United States as a remedy if a federal officer knowingly or negligently violates § 6103); 26 U.S.C. § 7213(a)(1) (providing that the willful disclosure by a federal officer of any return or return information is a federal crime); 26 U.S.C. § 7213A (making it unlawful for any federal officer or employee to inspect records in violation of § 6103). Where Congress has provided a particular remedy for the violation of a statute, that remedy, and not judicially imposed remedies, should apply in the absence of a constitutional violation. United States v. Ware, 161 F.3d 414, 424-25 (6th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). The exclusionary rule is therefore

A: holding that where congress has directed the agency to issue a rule without regard to any other provision of statute or regulation that applies to issuance of such rule  congress has amended the law and does not offend the constitution
B: holding that the exclusionary rule generally does not apply to immigration proceedings
C: holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to knockandannounce violations
D: holding that the exclusionary rule did not apply to alleged violations of 18 usc  201c2 which establishes criminal penalties for paying a witness to testify noting that generally when congress has designated a specific remedy for violation of one of its acts courts should presume that congress has engaged in the necessary balancing of interests to determine the appropriate penalty
D.