With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". with Avery Coleman. The District Court admitted this evidence not to permit the prosecution to show Coleman’s propensity to possess a firearm or narcotics, but instead ‘as proof of ... knowledge’ of their presence in the apartment, a permissible purpose pursuant Rule 404(b).”); United States v. Cassell, 292 F.3d 788, 793 (D.C.Cir.2002) (noting, in the context of a felon in possession case, that “[w]e have previously held that ‘in cases where a defendant is charged with unlawful possession of something, evidence that he possessed the same or similar things at other times is often quite relevant to his knowledge and intent with regard to the crime charged’ ” (quoting United States v. King, 254 F.3d 1098, 1100 (D.C.Cir.2001))); United States v. Moorehead, 57 F.3d 875, 878 (9th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Pelusio, 725 F.2d 161,

A: holding that actual knowledge of a coconspirator possessing a firearm qualifies as foreseeability
B: holding alford plea admissible in prosecution for felon in possession of firearm
C: holding that prior possession of a firearm is admissible to show knowledge in a prosecution for knowingly possessing a similar weapon
D: holding that in a prosecution for possession of an unregistered firearm evidence of an armed robbery committed with the firearm was admissible
C.