With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (<HOLDING>); United States v. Rubinson, 543 F.2d 951,

A: holding that parallel importation of genuine goods does not violate lanham act
B: holding the exclusion did not violate the equal protection clause of the wyoming constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution
C: holding that right to testify not denied where inter alia defendant made no objection to his attorneys statements that defendant would not testify and made no request to testify
D: holding that the fact that parallel proceedings force a defendant to make a difficult choice as to whether to testify does not of itself violate the constitution
D.