With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". when a doctor-patient relationship pre-exists the patient's admission to the hospital. See Weldon v. Seminole Municipal Hospital, OH., 709 P.2d 1058, 1059-1060 (1985). Under the theory of ostensible agency, a hospital can be vicariously liable for the negligence of a physician, notwithstanding the physician’s independent contractor status, when the patient looks for treatment "solely to the hospital” rather than viewing the facility as merely "the situs where his physician would treat him for his problems.” Id. 24 . Anderson, supra note 11 at 1339. 25 . We express no opinion today whether the physicians’ noble efforts constitute a “state interest”, but note that their pursuit cannot override a statutory enactment that gives them no immunity. See Anderson, supra note 11 at 1339 (<HOLDING>). 26 . Because we conclude that the 1985 GTCA

A: holding that plaintiffs could not sue attorneys for legal malpractice so long as underlying medical malpractice action out of which legal malpractice claim arose was still pending on appeal
B: holding that the gtca contemplates neither a a dichotomous division of patients who are malpractice plaintiffs based upon a means test nor b a judicial assessment of the doctors beneficent motivation in providing medical services
C: holding expert testimony not required to defeat summary judgment in medical malpractice suit because defendant doctors admissions were sufficient to establish the standard of care
D: holding that a patients settlement of a prior action brought against him by doctors for payment of a bill did not bar medical malpractice action against doctors
B.