With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 178, 186, 63 S.Ct. 182, 87 L.Ed. 169 (1942)); see also In re F & T Contractors, Inc., 649 F.2d 1229 (6th Cir. 1981). McMahon has since arguably overruled this proposition. These pre-McMahon courts determined that “the bankruptcy laws and related jurisdictional texts (see now 28 U.S.C. § 1384(e)(1)) limited the FAA, specifically as concerns exclusive jurisdiction over property of the estate in Muskegon and the claims allowance process in F & T Contractors.” B.J. Wade, 523 B.R. at 604. Two Tennessee bankruptcy courts have addressed whether McMahon overruled Muskegon and F & T Contractors.See In re B.J. Wade, 523 B.R. 594 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 2014); Trinity Commc’ns, LLC v. Momentum Telecomms., Inc. (In re Trinity Commc’ns, LLC), 2012 WL 1067673, at *14 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2012) (<HOLDING>); see also In re Hermoyian 435 B.R. 456 (Bankr.

A: holding that mcmahon overruled muskegon and f  t contractors
B: holding that  3501 overruled mcnabbmallory
C: holding that schlitz was overruled to that extent
D: holding that almendareztorres was not overruled by apprendi
A.