With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". scientist testified that the same pill bottle contained 5.78 grams of a substance that contained methamphetamine. Having already properly found that the methamphetamine was possessed with the intent to distribute it, it would be reasonable for the jury to infer that Mr. Eastom used the bag when conducting drug transactions. The accessibility of the firearms and their proximity to the drugs during these transactions allowed a reasonable jury to find that Mr. Eastom possessed the firearms in furtherance of his drug crime. See Robinson, 435 F.3d at 1251 (explaining the accessibility of the firearm and the proximity of the firearm to the drugs as factors that may facilitate proof that the defendant possessed a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime); Lott, 310 F.3d at 1248 (<HOLDING>). Therefore, sufficient evidence was presented

A: holding that acquisition of a firearm in exchange for drugs is a sufficient nexus to establish possession in furtherance of the drug sale
B: holding that the placement of a loaded weapon on the drivers seat of a car carrying drug instrumentalities was sufficient evidence of possession in furtherance of a crime
C: holding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that the juvenile a front seat passenger of a vehicle occupied by four persons was in possession of marijuana recovered from a crumpled piece of newspaper behind the drivers seat
D: holding that possession of a weapon is not in an of itself a crime
B.