With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". offense, ie., whether there was an improper grant of a mistrial by the trial court. In State v. Woodson, supra, this Court set out the parameters to consider where a mistrial may affect an individual’s double jeopardy rights, when we said: “The double jeopardy prohibition against retrial for the same offense attaches in a jury trial when the jury is empaneled and sworn. See Illinois v. Somerville, 410 U.S. 458, 467, 93 S.Ct. 1066, 1072, 35 L.Ed.2d 425, 433 (1973); Blondes v. State, 273 Md. 435, 444, 330 A.2d 169, 173 (1975). Thus, after jeopardy attaches, retrial is barred if a mistrial is declared without the defendant’s consent unless there is a showing of ‘manifest necessity’ to declare the mistrial. See United States v. Perez, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 579, 580, 6 L.Ed. 165, 165 (1824) (<HOLDING>). Although there is no clear test to determine

A: holding that adverse credibility determinations under the real id act must take into consideration the individual circumstances of the applicant
B: holding that the trial court was not authorized to dismiss misdemeanor charges without the states consent on the basis that the state had refused to consent to fishers waiver of a jury trial
C: holding that once the defendant is before the court the court will not inquire into the circumstances surrounding his presence there
D: holding that a trial court may discharge a jury without the defendants consent whenever taking all the circumstances into consideration there is a manifest necessity for the act
D.