With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". preserve the pre-trial status quo ... before a trial on the merits occurs.” RoDa Drilling Co. v. Siegal, 552 F.3d 1203, 1208 (10th Cir.2009) (emphasis added). In order to obtain a preliminary injunction, the movant must demonstrate: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a likelihood that the movant will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of equities tips in the movant’s favor; and (4) that the injunction is in the public interest. Id. (citing Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008)). The second factor, irreparable injury, may be satisfied if the movant shows a significant risk of irreparable harm. Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. Flowers, 321 F.3d 1250, 1258 (10th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, if the movant has established the

A: recognizing that not all constitutional harms are synonymous with irreparable harm and that mere assertion of a first amendment right does not automatically require a finding of irreparable harm rather the movant must show a chilling effect on protected activity
B: holding that the threat of irreparable harm must be immediate
C: holding that likelihood of irreparable harm must be based on evidence in the record not unsupported and conclusory statements regarding harm the plaintiff might suffer
D: holding that a party who can show a significant risk of irreparable harm has demonstrated that the harm is not speculative
D.