With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". held that “[u]nder the circumstances presented” the petitioner was entitled to credit for the time he had spent in community control. Id. We later confined Fraser’s holding to the unique circumstances involved. See Young v. State, 697 So.2d 75 (Fla.1997). In Young, the petitioner had been given a prison sentence to be followed by a period of community control. Id. at 76. After serving his entire prison sentence and part of his community control, he violated the conditions of his community control. Id. The trial court refused to give him credit against his subsequent prison sentence for the time he spent in community control. Id. We upheld that decision, noting that section 948.06(2), Florida Statutes (1993), provided that “[n]o part of the time that the defendant is on proba DCA 2003) (<HOLDING>); Toomajan v. State, 785 So.2d 1275, 1276 (Fla.

A: holding that florida law dictates that credit cannot be given for time served on community control
B: holding that credit cannot be awarded for time served on community control
C: holding that although a defendant can waive credit for time served in prison on the original sentence as part of a negotiated plea agreement such waiver must be clearly shown on the record and cannot be presumed
D: holding that time served on community control may not be applied to a postrevocation sentence of incarceration
A.