With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". we emphasize that our recognition that this is a marginal ease does not permit us to simply substitute our judgment for that of the fact-finder below. We believe that to reverse the BOR would constitute a reweighing of the evidence which is forbidden upon review by this Court pursuant to West Virginia Code § 23-5-15(c). Moreover, West Virginia Code § 23 — 1—1(b) (2007) abrogated the historical “rule of liberality” and provides that “workers’ compensation cases shall be decided on their merits and that a rule of ‘liberal construction’ based on any ‘remedial’ basis of workers’ compensation legislation shall not affect the weighing of evidence in resolving such eases.” See Bias v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp., 220 W.Va. 190, 209, 640 S.E.2d 540, 559 (2006) (Davis, C.J., concurring) (<HOLDING>). More specifically, the Legislature has

A: recognizing statutory abrogation of rule of liberality in workers compensation claims
B: recognizing abrogation
C: recognizing abrogation of kassen
D: recognizing workers compensation insurance carrier owes employee duty of good faith and fair dealing in processing compensation claims
A.