With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of or right to a colloquy before waiving mitigating evidence. Schriro, 550 U.S. at -, 127 S.Ct. at 1943; see also Commonwealth v. Mallory, 941 A.2d 686, 697 (Pa.2008). 12 . We recognize, of course, that the Schriro decision was rendered on habeas review, and thus some of the Court’s observations are couched not as absolutes under Strickland, but rather, in terms of the reasonableness of the state court's decision in applying Supreme Court precedent. Nevertheless, the Court's teachings on the importance and effect of a defendant's directives to counsel concerning mitigation are obviously highly relevant here. 13 . The verdict slip also clearly provided that the aggravating circumstances were to be found unanimously. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Duffey, 585 Pa. 493, 889 A.2d 56, 70 (2005)

A: recognizing importance of transcript to rehabilitation of debtor
B: recognizing importance of properly communicating law by written instructions on verdict slip
C: recognizing the importance of the employers knowledge of the disability
D: recognizing the diminished importance of the state policy factor
B.