With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". impaired to the degree of being incapable of effectively participating in a [legal] proceeding and thus need[s] the assistance of a fiduciary representative.” People ex rel. M.M., 726 P.2d 1108, 1119 (Colo.1986); see also May v. Colo. Civil Rights Comm’n, 43 P.3d 750, 755 (Colo.App.2002). Again, Graham has not established he meets Colorado’s statutory definition of mental incompetence. Nor do we find he is incapable of effectively participating in his legal proceedings. Graham filed two well-drafted complaints, and he prepared and responded to several substantive motions. Indeed, in light of the quality of his filings, the district court questioned wheth er Graham was really appearing pro se. See' Lichtenhafm v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 72 F.3d 138, at *1 (10th Cir.1995) (unpublished) (<HOLDING>). Because we find Graham is hot mentally

A: holding that if an attorney is discharged without cause he is entitled to a charging lien for the reasonable value of his services rendered prior to the date of the substitution of counsel where 1 his representation was entirely competent and successful up until his discharge 2 any potential conflict of interest was disclosed and the plaintiff chose to continue to be represented by the attorney and 3 the discharge of the attorney occurred solely because of a fee dispute
B: holding that identification of appellant in notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement and that the failure to name a party in a notice to appeal constitutes a failure of that party to appeal
C: recognizing the right to counsel on appeal
D: holding plaintiff didnt satisfy the requirements for appointment of a guardian to pursue the instant case because the plaintiffs notice of appeal to the administrative agency appearing in the record  is the work of a competent person either plaintiff is competent enough to handle that appeal or he had the help of obviously competent counsel
D.