With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". for a serious health condition, the employer may request certification by the employee's health provider. 29 C.F.R. § 825.305(a). Simpson v. Office of the Chief Judge of the Cir. C. of Will Cnty., 559 F.3d 706, 709 (7th Cir.2009); Kauffman, 426 F.3d at 886. Certification is sufficient if it provides the date the serious health condition began, its probable duration, relevant medical facts, and a statement that the employee is unable to work. 29 U.S.C. § 2613(b); 29 C.F.R. § 825.306. Kauffman, 426 F.3d at 886. If the employee fails to submit certification of her condition in a timely manner, then an employer is entitled to deny FMLA leave. 29 C.F.R. § 825.313. Simpson, 559 F.3d at 709. Under the regulations, if an employer finds a certification incomplete, the emplo t *4 (N.D.Ill.2009) (<HOLDING>); Sewall v. Chi. Transit Auth., 2001 WL 40802

A: holding that there was no sustainable fmla interference claim wherein a plaintiff could not establish that her daughter suffered from a serious health condition as defined by the regulations
B: holding a plaintiff to be ineligible for fmla leave wherein the plaintiff had not accumulated enough work hours
C: holding that employee who exceeded fmla leave was subject to immediate discharge on the very first workday that he was both absent from work and no longer protected by the fmla
D: holding that an employee who did not present evidence that she could have returned to work prior to the expiration of her fmla leave allowance was not entitled to additional leave merely because her employer had not properly provided her with notice that the leave was designated as fmla leave
B.