With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to law enforcement over some three months before Pradubsri’s vehicle was located and stopped. However, given that the informant’s identity was known to law enforcement and she had a history of providing reliable information, Finch was justified in making the stop once he saw Pradubsri driving a vehicle matching the informant’s description in the small, identified area at a time when the informant had reported drugs and two specified weapons would very likely be in the vehicle. See Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146-47, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972) (stating an unverified tip from a known informant may not have been sufficient to establish probable cause but carried enough indi-cia of reliability to justify a forcible stop and frisk); Rogers, 368 S.C. at 535, 629 S.E.2d at 682 (<HOLDING>); Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266, 276, 120 S.Ct.

A: holding that receiving conflicting stories from the driver and passenger of a stopped car about their travel gave the officer reasonable suspicion to extend the terry stop
B: holding affidavit insufficient when it failed to state when affiant received information from informant when informant obtained information or when described incident took place
C: holding reasonable suspicion existed when a police officer stopped a vehicle after receiving information from a known and accountable informant whose reputation could be assessed
D: holding that officer had reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle when confidential informant personally observed the vehicle provided a description of the vehicle and its direction detailed the basis for her suspicion that the vehicle was engaged in illegal activity and had previously given reliable information that led to the successful apprehension of individuals engaged in various criminal activity
C.