With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. The Department of Revenue (Department), on behalf of Sharon M. Simmons, appeals a circuit court’s order vacating the Final Order of Paternity and Administrative Support issued by the Department against appellee, Bryant Wardlaw. The circuit court vacated the order upon its finding that the order was entered without proper notice and was thus void. Jurisdiction to judicially review administrative support orders rendered pursuant to section 409.2563, Florida Statutes (2009), lies with the district courts of appeal. Because the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to vacate the Final Order of Paternity and Administrative Support, we reverse the circuit court’s order. See § 120.68, Fla. Stat. (2009); Dep’t of Revenue v. Manasala, 982 So.2d 1257, 1259 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (<HOLDING>); Dep’t of Revenue v. Mohomed, 996 So.2d 900,

A: holding that an order vacating an arbitration award and directing a rehearing is the functional equivalent of an order granting a new trial
B: holding that circuit courts do not have jurisdiction to enter an order either vacating or retroactively affecting an administrative support order
C: holding that when the trial court signed an order dismissing the plaintiffs complaint but refused to enter a final judgment on that order the order refusing to enter judgment was appealable under former ors 190102a
D: holding that because trial courts order did not dispose of the defendants counterclaim that order was not a final judgment that would support an appeal
B.