With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is guilty of want of due diligence in failing to promptly institute the action to the prejudice of another. Thus, in order to prevail on an assertion of lach-es, respondents must establish: a) a delay arising from petitioner’s failure to exercise due diligence; and, b) prejudice to the respondents resulting from the delay. Id. (quoting In re Estate of Scharlach, 809 A.2d 376, 382-83 (Pa.Super.2002)). “The question of laches itself, however, is factual ... and is determined by examining the circumstances of each case.” Id. Laches arises when a party’s position or rights “are so prejudiced by length of tipie and inexcusable ividual act fell outside the ordinary administration of the estate, our courts have held the act did not bind the estate. See Hall v. Boyd, 6 Pa. 267, 270 (1847) (<HOLDING>); Benezet v. Hess, 63 Pa.Super. 408, 411 (1915)

A: holding estate was not bound by single coexecutors confession of judgment for claims regarding decedent debts even though acts done by one coexecutor which relate to the testators goods such as sale delivery possession  are considered as equivalent to the acts of all as they possess a joint authority
B: holding that the acts of a corporate officer done in his or her official capacity are acts of the corporation
C: holding that a statement of conditional sale of goods can be filed with the state auditor before the delivery of goods where statute says the statement must be filed within ten days of delivery of goods
D: holding that the insurer is not bound by acts of the agent which are beyond the scope of his authority when the insured has notice of the limitations upon an agents authority or when the circumstances are sufficient to suggest that an inquiry should be made as to such limitations
A.