With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". occurring prior to December 7,1985, two years before the filing of the complaint, are not actionable under the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiff responds by alleging that the events leading to the institution of this suit comprise a continuum of tortious misconduct. Since the last event—the December 9, 1985 stop work order—occurred within the applicable limitation period, plaintiff argues all allegations in his claim under section 1983 are actionable based upon a continuing cause of action theory. Initially, the court must determine the applicable limitation period. Delaware’s two-year limitation period for personal injuries, 10 Del.C. § 8119, applies to actions under section 1983. See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 277-80, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 1947-49, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985) (<HOLDING>); Cuffy v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 648

A: holding that the states personal injury statutes of limitation should be applied for claims under section 1983
B: holding that claims under 42 usc  1983 are not personal injury tort claims
C: holding that in actions brought under 42 usc  1983 federal courts apply the states statute of limitation for personal injury
D: holding that federal courts apply the forum states personal injury statute of limitations for section 1983 claims
A.