With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 209, 210-11 (App. Div. 2005), where an attorney made fraudulent transfers to his wife to avoid a judgment, testified falsely at a deposition, and flouted certain court orders. A disciplinary proceeding resulted in the attorney being suspended from the practice of law for one year. Goldman, 795 N.Y.S.2d at 212. If faced with an attorney who engaged in the same conduct as Goldman, we would have imposed a sanction at least as severe as the one imposed in that case. Compare Bruzga’s Case, 145 N.H. 62, 71-72 (2000) (suspending an attorney for one year for making misrepresentations about his ex-wife in an abuse and neglect petition, submitting said petition in an effort to harass, and “[e]ngag[ing] in semantical gamesmanship” to justify his actions), with Grew’s Case, 156 N.H. at 370 (<HOLDING>). In determining the length of suspension

A: holding that twoyear delay was not reasonable
B: holding that presumptive sanction for two counts of vehicular homicide is twoyear suspension
C: holding that a twoyear suspension was appropriate in the face of several mitigating circumstances for an attorney who was convicted of misdemeanorlevel insurance fraud
D: holding that it was appropriate for the trial court to find that lack of a prior criminal record was not a mitigating factor in light of the violent nature of the crime committed
C.