With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the account. McColley’s employment was not terminated, even though she was roughly the same age as Schliske. Thus, in every case in which the investigation revealed a violation of the Friends and Family policy which occurred after April 19, 2005, the result was the same. Plaintiff also directs the court to evidence that a more thorough investigation would have revealed other violations of the Friends and Family policy by other associates in the Fort Dodge office. Evidence of a poorly conducted investigation, standing alone, absent evidence that defendants acted in bad faith, failed to follow their ordinary disciplinary procedures or treated other employees differently-proof that is totally absent here-cannot show pretext or defeat a summary judgment motion. See Roeben, 545 F.3d at 643 (<HOLDING>)(citing Hanebrink v. Brown Shoe Co., 110 F.3d

A: holding that ejven if plaintiff could show that the employers investigation was poorly conducted or that its decision was impetuous that alone would not allow him to survive summary judgment
B: holding that plaintiffs allegation that defendant conditioned its software on purchase of its hardware was sufficient to survive summary judgment
C: holding without discussing the plaintiffs burden of persuasion that the plaintiff had presented sufficient evidence to survive summary judgment
D: holding that selfserving deposition testimony standing alone is insufficient to survive a motion for summary judgment
A.