With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". it has jurisdiction over the defendant); Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Wiggins, 77 Ga. App. 756, 760 (49 SE2d 909) (1948) (“the doctrine of forum non conveniens [canjnot defeat jurisdiction ... for residents of Georgia in cases where jurisdiction of a defendant can be obtained”); but see AT&T Corp. v. Sigala, 274 Ga. 137 (549 SE2d 373) (2001) (adopting the doctrine of forum non con-veniens in cases involving foreign plaintiffs). Accordingly, in Georgia “the doctrine of forum non conveniens is generally controlled by statutory provisions.” Holtsclaw, 269 Ga. at 164 (citations omitted); see, e.g., OCGA § 50-2-21 (effective July 1, 2003) (allowing application of forum non conveniens for a “civil cause of action of a nonresident accruing outside this state”); compare Sigala, 274 Ga. at 137 (<HOLDING>). As explained by our Supreme Court, “statutes

A: holding that georgia courts may exercise their inherent power to dismiss cases brought by nonresident aliens
B: recognizing the inherent power of the courts to issue warrants
C: recognizing courts inherent power to issue subpoenas
D: holding that district courts have inherent power to control their dockets as long as its exercise is not inconsistent with a rule or statute
A.