With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in 2012, section 776.012(1) read, in relevant part, as follows; A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against. the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to. retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or. another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony .... § 776.012(1). Construing the identical text of section 776.012(1) set forth above, our court has held that this version of section 776.012(1) did not i . 3d DCA 2014) (<HOLDING>). Indeed, our court explained that an

A: holding that endangering conduct need not be engaged in in the childs presence
B: holding that a person engaged in an unlawful activity such as possession of an illegal firearm by a felon would not be entitled to claim immunity under section 7760321 based on the use of force as permitted in section 7760133
C: holding that defendant need not establish that he was not engaged in unlawful activity under section 776012
D: holding an anonymous tip insufficient to support reasonable suspicion based on the fact that defendant was suspected of drug activity in his community failed to corroborate he currently was engaged in drug related activity and surveillance failed to uncover any independent information that defendant was engaged in any criminal activity
C.