With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the box which was in the defendant’s pocket prior to the time they searched the defendant and removed the box from the defendant’s pocket, ... the fruits of that search are not to be considered by you in arriving at your verdict, and in that case you should return a verdict of not guilty. Record on Appeal vol. 2, at 145-46, 178-79, 210-11 (emphasis added). Because the record indicates that the district court, at most, made only an initial determination of whether officer Young saw the cocaine in plain view and left the ultimate determination of that question to the jury, we reject the government’s' argument. III For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE Lang’s conviction and REMAND for a new trial. 1 . See Terry v. State of Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1884-85, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) (<HOLDING>). We do not address the validity of the Terry

A: holding that an officer making a reasonable investigatory stop should not be denied the opportunity to protect himself from attack by a hostile suspect  and he may conduct a weapons search limited in scope to this protective purpose
B: holding that a police officer may order an individual out of his car and frisk him for weapons if there is a reasonable belief that the individual is armed and dangerous
C: holding that where a police officer observes unusual conduct which leads him reasonably to conclude in light of his experience that criminal activity may be afoot and that the persons with whom he is dealing may be armed and presently dangerous  he is entitled for the protection of himself and others in the area to conduct a carefully limited search of the outer clothing of such persons in an attempt to discover weapons which might be used to assault him
D: holding that a limited search of the outer clothing of a suspect for weapons is reasonable where the officer has a reasonable articulable basis for believing that the suspect may be armed and presently dangerous
C.