With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to be a conviction or impose any civil disabilities ordinarily resulting from a conviction for a crime.” (Emphasis added.) Additionally, recognizing that juvenile adjudications are “quasi-criminal in nature” necessarily demonstrates that juvenile adjudications are, in fact, not criminal. Indeed, Black’s Law Dictionary defines the term “quasi” as: “Seemingly but not actually; in some sense or degree; resembling; nearly.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1363 (9th ed.2Q09) (emphasis added). Thus, although it. is correct to characterize juvenile-delinquency proceedings as “quasi-criminal in nature,”- such a characterization does not mandate a finding that a juvenile adjudication is the functional equivalent of a criminal conviction. See also Jennings v. State, 384 So.2d 104, 105 (Ala.1980) (<HOLDING>). Additionally, under Rule 32.1, I cannot

A: holding when observable defects in a highway have existed for a time so long that they ought to have been observed notice of them is implied and is imputed to those whose duty it is to repair them
B: holding that whether the defendant is a member of a group specifically authorized to possess firearms is an affirmative defense rather than an element of the crime
C: recognizing that our juvenile statute removes juveniles who have committed a crime from the jurisdiction of the criminaljustice system and establishes an entirely separate system to minister to them a system whose aim is rehabilitative rather than retributive
D: holding that it is the conduct required to obtain a conviction rather than the consequences resulting from the crime that is relevant
C.