With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 224 N.C. 215, 29 S.E.2d 260 (1944), for the proposition that default on the deed of trust does not occur “relative to taxes until demand or notice is given and [Weinman] fails to comply.” This reliance is misplaced for two reasons. First, the foreclosure in Oliver was based on the failure to pay taxes, whereas in this case, foreclosure was based on failure to make the second principal and interest payment. The failure to pay taxes here relates only to the right to a release. Second, the deed of trust in Oliver did not specify a time when taxes were due. Hence, the Supreme Court held notice was therefore necessary before initiating foreclosure. In this case, however, the time when taxes were due was clearly specified in the deed of trust. See Lorraine Corp. at 565, 255 S.E.2d at 262 (<HOLDING>). Because Weinman has no right to have the

A: holding that oliver does not control when deed of trust designates specific time when payment of taxes is due
B: holding that imposition of social security taxes on persons who object to the receipt or payment of public insurance benefits on religious grounds does not violate the first amendment
C: holding that the insurer is allowed to continue its investigation beyond the time that payment is due under the policy if reasonably necessary
D: holding that the term reverse payment is not limited to a cash payment
A.