With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". equipment to a site designated by Tyr-Ree no later than February 1, 1990. By February 14,1990, when TyrRee had not yet procured a site, the parties executed the storage agreement. This agreement merely supplemented the contract by requiring Tyr-Ree to pay Shred Pax if Shred Pax stored the equipment beyond April, 1990. Consequently, I agree with the defendants that the storage agreement represents a modification to the Purchase Order. Because I find that the storage agreement is properly viewed as a modification to the Purchase Order rather than a separate contract, I must determine whether the modified Purchase Order, now incorporating both goods and services, still comes within the scope of the Illinois codification of the Uniform Commercial anor Water Co., 532 F.2d 572 (7th Cir.1976) (<HOLDING>). Because the agreement to store the equipment

A: holding that the validity of a contract for a commission for the sale of real estate is determined by the law of the state where the contract is made
B: holding that a contract for the design construction and installation of a water tank was predominantly a contract for the sale of goods under the ucc
C: holding that the installation of a burglar alarm system was a sale of goods within the meaning of the ucc 13 pa consstat  2105a
D: holding that a contract for the design manufacture and installation of two furnaces was predominantly a contract for the sale of goods and therefore subject to the uccs fouryear statute of limitations
B.