With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (4th Cir.1995); EEOC v. Hansa Products, Inc., 844 F.2d 191, 192 n. 1 (4th Cir.1988). The Virginia Council on Human Rights is charged with administering the provisions of the Virginia Human Rights Act (“VHRA”), Va.Code § 2.1-714 et seq. Virginia is a “deferral state” and the Virginia Council on Human Rights is a “deferral agency.” Tinsley v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 155 F.3d 435 (4th Cir.1998); Capps v. City of Lynchburg, 67 F.Supp.2d 589, 590 (W.D.Va.1999). Although Virginia law does not create a specific cause of action for disability discrimination, the VHRA broadly prohibits discriminatory employment practices and allows the VCHR to investigate claims of discrimination, bringing it within the parameters of § 2000e-5(c). Tinsley, 155 F.3d at 440. Thus, for this C d 501 (W.D.Va.1999) (<HOLDING>). This case presents a slightly-different

A: holding that pleading was insufficient where the plaintiff failed to among other things set forth the dates of any fraudulent statements
B: holding that plaintiff had no jurisdiction in federal court because she failed to allege a state law claim but declining to discuss pleading requirement to set forth charge of discrimination
C: holding that the pleading standard set forth in twombly applies to all civil actions
D: holding that because the plaintiff did not allege facts indicating what specific medical information she provided to dps she failed to state a constitutional claim
B.