With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". even assuming Kansas law were to apply in this case, a Kansas court would nonetheless be bound by the Oklahoma court's divorce decree, and be compelled to give effect to the Oklahoma decree under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution. 2 . The Court’s Full Faith and Credit discussion merely illustrates the reasonableness of Philadelphia Life's legal position. The Court makes no final determination as to whether the Manley sisters or Caine should be entitled to the benefits. 3 . The Court likewise has concerns as to the enforceability of a choice of law provision that hinges only upon the physical location of the person signing the insurance application for choice of law determinations. 4 . See Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Archer, 655 F.2d 962, 965, (9th Cir.1981)

A: holding that a permanency planning order was not immediately appealable under rule 69 absent a rule 54b certification
B: holding that rule 54b certification order should contain specific findings setting forth reasons for certification
C: holding that entry of final judgment on a claim in a multiparty action pursuant to rule 54b should clearly articulate the reasons and factors underlying the decision to grant 54b certification
D: holding rule 54b certification invalid because unaccompanied by any statement of reasons and factors underlying trial courts decision to grant certification
B.