With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of Easton, Inc., 142 Md. 526, 121 A. 475, 478 (1923). Void ab initio, the ersatz amendment has not improved with age. Nor did filing with the Department of State breathe life into a dead letter. The Millers' claim of authority over the assets can be traced ultimately to the initial, ultra vires amendment, which bears some legal resemblance to a wild deed. Title to land cannot be conferred by a wild deed of comparable vintage. See Marshall v. Hollywood, Inc., 236 So.2d 114, 118-120 (Fla. 1970). Until enactment of the Marketable Record Title Act, a forged or otherwise void deed was a nullity which could never start the running of a statute of limitations, see Reed v. Fain, 145 So.2d 858, 864 (Fla.1961), even if recorded. See Wright v. Blocker, 144 Fla. 428, 434, 198 So. 88, 90 (Fla.1940) (<HOLDING>). 11 . While the Church has standing to assert

A: holding a claimants injury report to a fellow employee did not satisfy the act because the claimants supervisor did not learn of the injury until six months later
B: holding recording afforded no protection to the claimants thereunder
C: holding that lprs are entitled to the protection of the equal protection clause
D: holding that the rights afforded prisoners set a floor for those that must be afforded sexually violent predators subject to civil detention
B.