With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". attention. We note that five Texas appellate courts have addressed, in published opinions, whether, after the promulgation of Rule 509, a reasonable expectation of privacy exists in medical records containing blood test results where the records were made for medical purposes but were later subpoenaed by a grand jury. Four out of five held that society does not recognize as reasonable an expectation of privacy in those kinds of records. Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993); Corpus v. State, 931 S.W.2d 30 (Tex.App.—Austin 1996); Clark v. State, 933 S.W.2d 332 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1996); Knapp v. State, 942 S.W.2d 176 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1997). But see State v. Conrad, CR-T1-97-23-133, slip op. (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.], delivered May 22, 1997)(<HOLDING>). The main rationale articulated by these

A: holding appellant failed to show any expectation of privacy in files stored on the computer system in his office was one that society accepts as objectively reasonable
B: holding conditional release into society of probationer decreases expectation of privacy
C: holding that society recognizes a reasonable expectation of privacy
D: holding that prisoners do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells
C.