With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". above, Hotel Eden’s motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction or for forum non conveniens are denied. The parties should appear for a scheduling conference on May 7, 2002, at 4:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 . Travel Bound's facsimile cover sheet refers to itself as "A Gulliver’s Company.” Cert, of Andrew Jacobs, Ex. N. 2 . There is no jurisdiction under New York's long-arm statute, C.P.L.R. § 302(a), because there is an insufficiently strong connection between the reservations made inside the State of New York and the tort itself (requiring that causes of action brought under § 302(a) arise out of the non-domiciliary’s contacts with New York). See Noble v. Singapore Resort Motel of Miami Beach, 21 N.Y.2d 1006, 1008, 290 N.Y.S.2d 926, 927, 238 N.E.2d 328 (1968)

A: holding that reservations made inside the state of new york were not closely related enough to alleged tort within florida hotel to warrant jurisdiction under cplr  302
B: holding jurisdiction over nonresident defendant existed where note was payable in new york contained new york choice of law clause and proceeds were used to finance new york limited partnership
C: holding that two meet ings in new york and numerous telephone calls and correspondence to new york were not sufficient to confer jurisdiction
D: holding that contract signed in new york by promisor from florida and partially performed in florida was governed by new york law because it was executed in new york
A.