With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the enumerated offense of aggravated assault because his [Iowa] offense did not require proof of an underlying assault and therefore does not comport with the generic, contemporary definition of that crime.” Esparza-Perez, 681 F.3d at 231. As construed by state and federal courts in Iowa, sections 708.1(3) and 708.2(3) do not require that the defendant cause, attempt to cause, or threaten to cause bodily injury or offensive contact to another. Unlike the “generic meaning,” sections 708.1(3) and 708.2(3) do not require proof that the defendant intended to use the weapon, threatened to use the weapon, or that the acts were intended or reasonably calculated to place another in fear of harmful or offensive contact. See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 565 F.3d 438, 440-12 (8th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); State v. Harris, 705 N.W.2d 105, 2005 WL

A: holding that arrest by the back door of defendants house was unlawful
B: holding that the defendant committed assault under section 70813 where he came into the apartment for about two seconds with a gun in his right hand held the gun straight down at his side said wrong door then closed the door and started knocking on the other apartments door
C: holding direct testimony tying a defendant to a gun was not required when the gun was found in the defendants truck and when the defendant had both ammunition for the gun and a rack in which it could have been kept
D: holding that the second element was not satisfied where the defendant shined a flashlight into a glass door for five to ten seconds then left the area and was stopped by police officer thirteen blocks away
B.