With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is a “threshold inquiry,” which must be resolved before reaching the merits of a suit. See City of Clarkson Valley v. Mineta, 495 F.3d 567, 569 (8th Cir.2007). “To show Article disputed parcels into trust, Roberts County will lose $254.92, $259.34, $1300.86, and $1474.80, respectively, in annual property taxes. It is reasonably certain the State will be deprived of additional tax revenues, because the State is “categorically]” prohibited from laying a direct tax “on a tribe or on tribal members inside Indian country.” Okla. Tax Comm’n v. Chickasaw Nation, 515 U.S. 450, 458, 115 S.Ct. 2214, 132 L.Ed.2d 400 (1995). Thus, the State has a direct and tangible economic interest in the agency’s decision. See Akiachak Native Cmty. v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 584 F.Supp.2d 1, 7 (D.D.C. 2008) (<HOLDING>). To proceed on its claim, the State also must

A: recognizing that the government not the relator must have suffered the injury in fact required for article iii standing
B: holding noneconomic harm satisfies article iii standing requirements
C: holding that article iii standing is necessary for intervention
D: recognizing a states interest in the loss of taxing and regulatory authority over lands taken into trust was sufficient to satisfy article iii standing
D.