With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". with limited capacity, but rather that the negligent maintenance of pumps which were already in place caused the damage. “[0]nce a governmental entity builds or takes control of property or an improvement, it has the same common law duty as a private person to properly maintain and operate the property. See ... City of Tallahassee v. Elliott, 326 So.2d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert, denied, 344 So.2d 324 (Fla.1977) (maintenance of drainage system).” Trianon, 468 So.2d at 920-21; accord Avallone v. Board of County Comm’rs of Citrus County, 493 So.2d 1002 (Fla.1986). Therefore, having undertaken to operate the sewer system, the City owed a duty to maintain the pumps in a non-negligent manner. See, e.g., City of New Smyrna Beach Utilities Comm’n v. McWhorter, 418 So.2d 261 (Fla.1982) (<HOLDING>); see Bray v. City of Winter Garden, 40 So.2d

A: holding that a municipal sewer system is liable for the acts of a third party that discharged hazardous waste into the system
B: recognizing doctrine
C: holding a city liable for a dangerous condition caused by a submerged municipal sewer pipe in federal waters
D: recognizing that city may be liable for negligent maintenance of sewer system even though doctrine of res ipsa loquitor was inapplicable
D.