With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". an enterprise which was engaged in racketeering activity. Government Brief at 27. According to the Government: Although many of the substantive offenses in the [Redacted Superseding] Indictment charge only some of the [Defendants, all of those counts are charged as schemes in connection with the RICO conspiracy. Thus, although each defendant may have had a different role in the RICO conspiracy, all defendants were centrally involved in the conspiracy. Id. at 27-28; see United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438, 447, 106 S.Ct. 725, 731, 88 L.Ed.2d 814 (1986) (explaining that joinder of multiple defendants in a single trial is proper under Rule 8 when an indictment “charge[s] all the defendants with one overall count of conspiracy”); United States v. Price, 13 F.3d 711, 719 (3d Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1372, 131

A: holding that evidence of defendants recruitment of single drug courier was sufficient to support section 3b11c enhancement
B: holding that there was a sufficient basis for joinder of seven defendants in a single trial where all the defendants were charged with participation in a single overarching drug conspiracy
C: holding that a master conspiracy with subschemes to sell speed was a single conspiracy
D: holding that the district court made sufficient factual findings and adequately determined the scope of defendants participation in a conspiracy under  1b13 even though the district court did not expressly determine the scope of the defendants participation
B.