With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to force Con/ Span, an Ohio corporation, to defend a law suit in Texas that is unrelated to the limited contacts Con/Span actually has made with this forum. 2. Specific Jurisdiction “Specific jurisdiction may be found when a foreign defendant ‘has “purposefully directed” his activities at residents of the forum, and the litigation results from alleged injuries that “arise out of or relate to” those activities.’ ” Religious Tech. Ctr., 339 F.3d at 375 (quoting Burger King Carp., 471 U.S. at 472, 105 S.Ct. 2174 (1985) (citing Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 465 U.S. 770, 774, 104 S.Ct. 1473, 79 L.Ed.2d 790 (1984) and Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, 466 U.S. at 414, 104 S.Ct. 1868)); Bearry, 818 F.2d at 374; Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, 466 U.S. at 415-16, 104 S.Ct. 1868 (<HOLDING>). The court has already discussed the contacts

A: holding that when determining whether a nonresident defendant has continuous and systematic contacts with texas sufficient to support general jurisdiction courts examine the defendants contacts and forumrelated activities only up to the time that suit was filed
B: holding that the court must look for continuous and systematic general business contacts  ie general jurisdiction  if the causes of action do not arise from or relate to the foreign defendants contacts with the forum state
C: holding that standing alone defendants 4 million in sales in the forum state over a sevenyear period may not have been sufficient to support the exercise of general jurisdiction but that the numerous other contacts with the forum in the case including advertising relationships with dealers and more than 150 visits tipped the balance and led the court to conclude that there were sufficient contacts to allow the exercise of general jurisdiction
D: holding that a ceos trip to the forum state to negotiate a services contract did not constitute the continuous and systematic general business contacts required to subject the corporation to general jurisdiction in the state
B.