With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v Martin, 367 Mass 404; 326 NE2d 12 (1975) (necessary means "wise in the light of facts known at the time rendered”); and Group Hospitalization, Inc v Levin, 305 A2d 248 (DC App, 1973) ("necessary” means "reasonably calculated to shorten and relieve an ordeal of agonizing pain and thereby effectuate the most rapid recovery possible”). Reference to McLaughlin v Connecticut General Life Ins Co, 565 F Supp 434 (ND Cal, 1983), illustrates that Free’s list of definitions was not exhaustive. McLaughlin cites, inter alia, Fassio v Montana Physician’s Service, 170 Mont 320; 553 P2d 998 (1976) (finding that the language "necessary services” requires only that services be prescribed and performed by a licensed physician), and Aetna Life Ins Co v Sanders, 127 Ga App 352; 193 SE2d 173 (1972) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, McLaughlin provides a new

A: holding that the language necessary to the treatment should be construed to accord great weight to a physicians recommendation
B: holding  362h should be construed more broadly than its literal language and should be read in conjunction with all of  362
C: holding that if a document is facially clear it will be construed according to its language
D: holding that railroad immunity act should be strictly construed
A.