With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to develop a workable standard and resolve each dispute. The statutory privilege is not a legal defense to a discovery dispute, but the rationale of the privilege provides an important perspective in gaining a full understanding of the privacy interest at stake. The competing fundamental interest at stake in this case is derived from constitutional protections provided to an accused to confront witnesses in a criminal trial and to be given a fair trial. A defendant in a criminal case not only has a right to confront witnesses with effective cross-examination, but due process and the right to a fair trial also demand an accused be given a full and fair opportunity to present a claim of self-defense. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315, 94 S.Ct. 1105, 1110, 39 L.Ed.2d 347, 353 (1974) (<HOLDING>); see also Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S.

A: holding that a district court in its discretion may limit crossexamination in order to preclude repetitive questioning upon determining that a particular subject has been exhausted even during the trial phase when defendants actually have a constitutional right to confront witnesses and more extensive due process rights than they have at sentencing
B: holding that the constitutional right to crossexamination must be satisfied first before the court can exercise its discretion in limiting the scope or extent of crossexamination
C: recognizing defendants right to confront witnesses with adequate crossexamination
D: recognizing defendants right to due process includes the right to present a defense by crossexamining witnesses
C.