With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". repeated attempts to get up and eventually took appellant to the patrol car to prevent “injury to himself or to me or to other persons out on the scene.” The first officer testified these steps were consistent with police protocol regarding how to treat a person who may be violent. She also testified she was still investigating the incident when she went to the patrol car and asked appellant what happened. See id. (“The investigative detention did not evolve into an arrest simply because appellant was escorted to the patrol car and handcuffed. [The officer] did only that which was reasonably necessary to ensure his own safety while investigating appellant’s possible involvementf.]”); see also Turner v. State, 252 S.W.3d 571, 580 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, pet. ref'd) (<HOLDING>). Appellant has not presented evidence to

A: holding the defendant was not under arrest when police asked him to go to the station and then offered him a ride because he did not have transportation
B: holding that defendant had the right to refuse to answer questions put to him by police officer who had called him
C: holding that defendant was arrested  when the police officer took physical custody of him by grabbing his arm and returned him to the hotel for detention there
D: holding that suspect was not in custody when officer handcuffed him for officer safety while transporting him to police station
D.