With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is a split among the circuits on this question, our approach accords with that taken by the majority of the circuits to have considered the question. Compare Jones v. International Riding Helmets, Ltd., 49 F.3d 692, 695 (11th Cir.1995) (requiring lack of reasonable inquiry and frivolousness); Kale v. Combined Ins. Co. of America, 861 F.2d 746, 759 (1st Cir.1988) (same); Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment Group, 854 F.2d 1452, 1470 (2d Cir.1988) (same), rev’d in part on other grounds sub nom. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, 493 U.S. 120, 110 S.Ct. 456, 107 L.Ed.2d 438 (1989) with Garr v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 22 F.3d 1274 (3d Cir.1994) (sanctioning based solely on failure to conduct reasonable inquiry); Matter of Excello Press, Inc., 967 F.2d 1109, 1112 (7th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, concurring in

A: holding that the courts inquiry into the reasonableness of the governments proposed corrective action was proper
B: holding that reasonableness for qualified immunity purposes requires an objective inquiry into the totality of the circumstances
C: holding that the reasonableness inquiry is based upon the totality of the circumstances in determining whether or not a search was reasonable
D: holding that proper focus is reasonableness of inquiry not frivolousness
D.