With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". be fairly interpreted as mandating compensation by the Federal Government for the damage sustained” (emphasis added)). Therefore, the court does not have jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 or Fourteenth Amendment claims. 4. The United States Court of Federal Claims Does Not Have Jurisdiction Over A Just Compensation Clause Claim Based On Illegal Taxation. a. The Government’s Argument. Although the Government acknowledges that a claim asserted under the Just Compensation Clause to the United States Constitution is money-mandating, the Government argues that the court does not have jurisdiction over this claim, because the appropriate cause of action is a direct challenge to the tax levy. See Gov Corp., 419 U.S. 102, 127, 95 S.Ct. 335, 42 L.Ed.2d 320 (1974) (<HOLDING>); Rith Energy, Inc. v. United States, 247 F.3d

A: recognizing that every theory of relief must raise federal issue for claim to arise under federal law
B: holding that a disability must be evaluated at the time of the challenged employment action
C: holding that the federal action at issue must be authorized
D: holding state of the law must be determined at time of challenged action
C.