With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ” and therefore should be dismissed. Id. (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2)). In other words, if after taking the complaint’s well-pleaded factual allegations a d to perform under the contract for three years until the end of September 2012 when Defendant breached the contract by terminating it two years prematurely. These allegations are sufficient to state a claim for breach of contract under North Carolina law. Defendant’s contention that the five-year term was part of an oral agreement does not require dismissal. Under North Carolina law, a valid contract may be partially written and partially parol. McMichael v. Borough Motors, Inc., 14 N.C.App. 441, 444, 188 S.E.2d 721, 722 (1972); see also Beal v. K.H. Stephenson Supply Co., Inc., 36 N.C.App. 505, 508, 244 S.E.2d 463, 465 (1978) (<HOLDING>). The Statute of Frauds does not apply to

A: holding that when a contract is partially parol and partially written parol evidence may prove the parol terms
B: holding the parol evidence rule presumes finality with respect to the written terms of the agreement only and does not prevent consideration of parol evidence concerning the duration of contract
C: holding parol evidence is admissible to show mistake
D: holding that parol evidence can be presented when the terms of the agreement are ambiguous
A.