With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". an aid to either.” Id. at 1167. In this case, the evidence showed that Jackson possessed a trafficking amount of cocaine, but there was no proof that he possessed it in Hillsborough County. Jackson sold cocaine to Pressley and Robinson in South Florida, where they took possession of the contraband and returned to Hillsborough County. Their possession was adverse to and exclusive of Jackson’s interest. We agree, then, that Jackson could not have been an aider and abettor of their possession of cocaine in Hillsbor-ough County. Because the evidence failed to prove that Jackson committed trafficking by possession in the charged venue of Hillsbor-ough County, the trial court erred when denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. See State v. Dreyer, 594 So.2d 327, 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we reverse the conviction for

A: holding that there is no need for a formal motion for a judgment of acquittal in a bench trial because the plea of not guilty asks the court for a judgment of acquittal
B: holding that trial court erred in denying motion for judgment of acquittal when state failed to prove venue
C: holding in a capital case that the defendant waived his argument that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a change of venue where the trial court took the motion under advisement but the defendant failed to seek a ruling on the motion and failed to renew the motion after the jurors had been qualified
D: holding argument abandoned when defendant failed to cite any authority in specific support of his assertion that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial
B.