With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". for administrative and judicial relief from a wrongful zoning decision are unconstitutional. The gravamen of this claim is Greenspring’s allegation that because it might take “in excess of two years” to pursue administrative and judicial appeals, these procedures are unconstitutionally burdensome. However, Greenspring does not explain how it arrived at this two year projection, and in any event, delays of this magnitude are not unconstitutional burdens. Even when a significant delay is incurred in reversing a wrongful zoning board decision, and even when that delay causes the plaintiffs to default on their construction loans and lose everything to foreclosure, the Fourth Circuit has held that plaintiffs have not been deprived of procedural due process. Sylvia Dev., 48 F.3d at 817, 827(<HOLDING>). • Greenspring speculates that it could take

A: holding that a 13 month delay was unreasonable
B: holding that 11 month delay in reversing wrongful zoning board decision did not deprive plaintiff of due process
C: holding that discretion of zoning board was not sufficiently circumscribed to support substantive due process claim
D: holding that a five month delay is unreasonable
B.