With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". its employee because “purely economic losses are unrecoverable in tort. . . actions in the absence of personal injury or property damage” (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Straley, 533 N.E.2d 764, 771 (Ohio 1988) (“We do not find that a duty to an injured employee’s employer exists by virtue of the pronouncements of common law, by legislative enactment, or by operation of law. It would appear that such a duty could only exist based on contract or warranty.”); Ore-Ida Foods, Inc., 627 P.2d at 473 (citing the prevailing rule “that a plaintiff may not recover for economic loss resulting from negligent infliction of bodily harm to a third person”); Vogel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 571 N.W.2d 704, 708 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997) (<HOLDING>). {17} This conclusion is consistent with both

A: holding public policy prohibited employer from discharging employee in retaliation for seeking workers compensation benefits
B: holding that an employee has no right of action against an employer for wrongful discharge where no clear mandate of public policy is violated thereby
C: holding that no public policy stated where employee and not public at large would benefit from employees whistleblowing actions
D: holding as a matter of public policy that allowing damages to an employer for economic consequences arising from injuries to an employee would enter a field with no sensible stopping point
D.