With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". develop their equitable arguments in opposition to Defendants’ defense of statute of limitations. Plaintiffs argue that even if Durham’s right to an accounting was foreclosed, factual issues existed concerning the date the statute of limitations began to run on their claims of fraud, breach of constructive trust, breach of contract, and violation of the UPA. They contend these issues involve separate and distinct claims which may be asserted independently of their right to an accounting. {31} We think each of these arguments fails as to Durham. New Mexico follows the general rule that an action for a formal accounting is a prerequisite to initiating an action at law by a partner against the partnership or another partner. See Willey v. Renner, 8 N.M. 641, 646, 45 P. 1132, 1134 (1896) (<HOLDING>) (cited with approval in Levy v. Disharoon, 106

A: holding that a partner who is without actual authority has no power to bind the partnership in a transaction that is not within the ordinary and apparent scope of the partnership business any person dealing with a partner can only rely on the partners acts if they are within the ordinary and apparent scope of the partnership business
B: holding one partner can not sic maintain an action at law against another partner to recover an amount claimed by him by reason of partnership transactions until there has been a final settlement of the affairs of the partnership
C: holding a mechanic working in a garage owned by a partnership is an employee of the partnership not the individual partner
D: recognizing that in a divorce action one partys limited partnership interest could not be assigned to the other party without the consent of the general partner
B.