With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to enter a home, a defendant's failure to object to such entry is not sufficient to establish free and voluntary consent. We will not infer both the request and the consent.”). 2 . The evidence supports the district court’s finding that isolated pieces of evidence not immediately visible in the warehouse area— most importantly, a “booster list’’ of stolen items on a desk in the officer area of the building — were in plain view while the agents were lawfully attempting to get Kheir’s written consent to search the building. 3 . Kheir declined to memorialize this consent in writing without first speaking to a lawyer. But declining to sign a consent form does not automatically withdraw previously given oral consent. See United States v. Stevens, 487 F.3d 232, 240-41 (5th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Gomez-Diaz, 712 F.2d 949,

A: holding that a district court did not clearly err in finding consent where two agents testified that the defendant orally consented but the defendant denied having orally consented and would not sign a written consent form
B: holding that a district court did not clearly err in crediting agents testimony that a defendant had orally consented despite his refusal to sign consent form
C: holding that defendants consent was involuntary where defendant consented to search following a warrantless entry and officers explained that absent consent the officers would obtain a warrant
D: holding district courts finding of consent was not clearly erroneous when the defendant consented after officers told him they could get a drug dog even though the defendant knew the dog would alert
A.