With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". this Agreement, [Star Broadcasting] and [Hale] each agrees to waive the defense that [Qantum] has an adequate remedy at law and to interpose no opposition, legal or otherwise, as to the propriety of specific performance as a remedy. (D.E. No. 118, Exh. 2 at 32-33). This Court agrees with Plaintiffs observation that it is well-settled that parties are free to choose their own remedies in a contract and that courts can enforce such remedies. See, e.g., Media Gen. Broad., Inc. v. Pappas Telecasting, 152 F.Supp.2d 865, 869 (W-D.N.C.2001) (enforcing plain language of parties’ contract and ordering specific performance because “parties [are] free to shape their remedies according to their particular needs[.]”); Ocean Dunes Devel. Corp. v. Colangelo, 463 So.2d 437, 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (<HOLDING>) (citing Jay Vee Realty Corp. v. Jaymar Acres,

A: holding that if adequate administrative remedies are available it is improper to seek relief in court before those remedies are exhausted
B: holding that tjhere is no question that parties to a contract may agree to limit their respective remedies and that those remedies need not be the same if the contract provision is reasonable
C: holding that statute of limitations is tolled by pursuit of internal union remedies even where those remedies are ultimately determined to be futile
D: holding that the remedies are exclusive
B.