With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to achieve a fair determination of the defendant’s guilt or innocence of each crime. Minn. R.Crim. P. 17.03, subd. 3(1). Pursuant to the rule, a district court must first decide whether the joined offenses are related, and if so, the court must decide whether severance is nonetheless required because joinder would be prejudicial. State v. Profit, 591 N.W.2d 451, 459 (Minn.1999). Offenses are related when they are “part of a single behavioral incident or course of conduct.” Id. at 458 (citations omitted). In determining whether the offenses are part of a single behavioral incident or course of conduct, courts examine (1) “how the offenses were related in time and geographic proximity;” and (2) “whether the actor was motivated by a single criminal objective.” Dukes, 544 N.W.2d at 20 (<HOLDING>) Here, Dick told the police he had been banging

A: holding district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to sever numerous substantively unconscionable terms from arbitration agreement
B: holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a motion to sever separate charges of rape committed against the appellants two nieces
C: holding that the 9circuit court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a motion to sever separate charges of rape committed against the appellants two nieces
D: holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to sever trials where the time between the two crimes was a matter of only a few minutes the proximity was within one block and each crime was motivated by the objective of obtaining money through robbery
D.