With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". F.3d 804, 815 (7th Cir.2008). However both parties agree that our review is for plain error because Garrett forfeited his argument when he failed to raise it before the district co her there was an error, whether it was plain, and whether it affected substantial rights. United States v. Sawyer, 521 F.3d 792, 796 (7th Cir.2008). If all three conditions are met, we may exercise our discretion only if the error “seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. When sentencing a defendant, the first step is to calculate the Guidelines range correctly, and a mistake in that calculation warrants resentencing. United States v. Hawk, 434 F.3d 959, 963 (7th Cir.2006); See United State v. Thomas, 520 F.3d 729, 736, 2008 WL 755297, at *5 (7th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). A sentence based on an incorrect Guideline

A: holding that despite the advisory nature of the sentencing guidelines they remain the starting point and the initial benchmark of a district courts sentencing analysis the district court should begin all sentencing proceedings by correctly calculating the applicable guidelines range and keep that range in mind throughout the sentencing process and that failing to calculate or improperly calculating the guidelines range  or failing to adequately explain the chosen sentenceemdashincluding an explanation for any deviation from the guidelines range constitutes significant procedural error 
B: holding that the cocaine guidelines  are advisory only
C: holding a sentence within the advisory guidelines range is presumptively reasonable
D: holding that even though the guidelines are advisory a district court must accurately calculate and consult the defendants guidelines range
D.