With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". rejection in bankruptcy. And, to be sure, under § 365, if a debtor rejects an execu-tory contract, “it does not completely terminate the contract.” Med. Malpractice Ins. Ass’n v. Hirsch (In re Lavigne), 114 F.3d 379, 386-87 (2d Cir.1997). But Northwest did not reject the CBA at issue pursuant to § 365. It acted with the au thority of a court order entered pursuant to § 1113. Contract rejection under § 1113, unlike contract rejection under § 365, permits more than non-performance; it allows one party, with the court’s approval, to establish new terms that were not mutually agreed upon, the antithesis of a status quo. A carrier’s obligation to comply with those new terms cannot be reconciled with the continued existence of its prior contract. Compare In re Lavigne, 114 F.3d at 389 (<HOLDING>), with Comair, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots’ Ass’n,

A: holding that the obligation does not terminate upon death
B: holding that the statute incorporated all the rights and obligations of the contract emphasis added
C: holding under  365 that because the rejection does not terminate all contractual and statutory obligations the parties are not absolved from compliance with the contract
D: holding order granting a new trial is not a final appealable order because it does not terminate the action or any of the claims or parties in the action
C.