With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". & N. Dec. 479, 480 (BIA 1996) (internal quotation marks omitted), overruled on other grounds by Matter of Avetisyan, 25 I. & N. Dec. 688, 690 (BIA 2012). Petitioners also apparently ask this court to direct the DHS to engage in mediation with them, which is in essence a request to order the DHS to exercise prosecutorial discretion. But the DHS has sole authority to exercise prosecutorial discretion in immigration cases and we lack jurisdiction over those decisions. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(g); Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm., 525 U.S. 471, 485 n. 9, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999) (“Section 1252(g) was directed against a particular evil: attempts to impose judicial constraints upon prosecutorial discretion.”); Veloz-Luvevano v. Lynch, 799 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir.2015) (<HOLDING>). Petitioners also assert that Ms. Ramos-Rauda

A: holding court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over the governments prosecutorial discretion decisions
B: holding that the court of appeals lacks the authority to overrule decisions of the supreme court of north carolina and has a responsibility to follow those decisions until otherwise ordered by the supreme court
C: holding that district court abused discretion by denying review where over thirty appeal panels had heard appeals on the issue and issued conflicting decisions
D: holding that this court lacks jurisdiction to review decisions of the bia refusing to reopen immigration proceedings sua sponte
A.