With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the detention”). While the detention approved in Terry itself was a momentary frisk for weapons, see 392 U.S. at 29-30, 88 S.Ct. 1868, the courts have subsequently sanctioned Terry stops of longer- — -but still limited — duration. See, e.g., Sharpe, 470 U.S. at 687, 105 S.Ct. 1568 (20 minutes); Glover, 957 F.2d at 1013 (30 minutes); United States v. Sullivan, 903 F.2d 1093, 1097-98 (7th Cir.1990) (45 minutes); United States v. Borren, 770 F.Supp. 1178, 1189-91 (E.D.Mich.1991) (70 minutes); cf. Place, 462 U.S. at 709, 103 S.Ct. 2637 (“[W]e have never approved a seizure of the person for the prolonged 90-minute period involved here and cannot do so on the facts presented by this case.”); Ctr. for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City of Springboro, 477 F.3d 807, 828-29 (6th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>). Although “brevity” is an important

A: holding that a seventyfive minute terry stop was reasonable
B: holding that officers action of putting suspects on the ground and searching for weapons was within the scope of a terry stop
C: holding that agents did not escalate terry stop into custodial arrest by blockading suspects car and approaching with guns drawn
D: holding that threehour stop of terrorism suspects far exceeded the bounds of terry
D.