With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". vacancy caused by Balderas’s withdrawal, no similar vacancy existed for the Republican Party. {15} Reviewing our precedent, we conclude there is ample support for the Secretary of State’s position. See Skeen v. Hooper, 631 F.2d 707, 709, 711 (10th Cir.1980) (relying on the federal district court’s decision that, under Section l-8-8(A), a vacancy does not exist on the general election ballot unless the party ran a candidate in the primary election; also noting that a compelling state interest was served by ensuring “elections in New Mexico are conducted in a fair, honest and orderly fashion, unaccompanied by chaos, even when officials are confronted by a sudden change in events”); State ex rel. Van Schoyck v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 46 N.M. 472, 475, 481-82, 131 P.2d 278, 280, 284 (1942) (<HOLDING>); N.M. Att’y Gen. Op. 80-31 (1980) (stating

A: holding where there is no duty to defend there is no duty to indemnify
B: holding under previous version of section 188 that unless a candidate is nominated in the primary election there is no vacancy for the central committee to fill
C: holding that federal election laws prohibiting corporations and unions from using general treasury funds to make independent expenditures for speech defined as electioneering communication or for speech expressly advocating the election or defeat of a candidate is unconstitutional suppression of political speech
D: recognizing that in any criminal trial the credibility of the prosecutions witnesses is central
B.