With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. R.N., the mother of A.N., a dependent child, attempts to appeal an order, entered after an evidentiary hearing, that amended her case plan to include the single goal of adoption and directed the Department of Children and Families to file a petition for termination of parental rights. She argues the trial court erred when it denied her request to close the dependency case with a permanent guardianship to the child’s custodian, the grandmother. Although this proceeding was filed as a direct appeal, the challenged order is neither a final order nor an appealable, non-final order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110. See In re M.V.-B., 19 So.3d 381, 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (<HOLDING>); D.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 16

A: holding that orders entered in dependency proceedings after the entry of the order adjudicating dependency and before an order terminating supervision or jurisdiction are not appealable nonfinal orders
B: holding that review of nonfinal orders determining child custody in child dependency proceedings is not encompassed by rule 9130a3ciii which permits review of nonfinal orders determining child custody in domestic relations cases
C: holding that orders remanding an action to a federal agency are generally not considered final appealable orders
D: holding order in dependency proceeding was nonfinal where order reserved jurisdiction to determine integrallyrelated visitation and support issues
A.