With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". did not abuse its discretion. {10} As Defendant points out, a lone biased juror undermines the impartiality of an entire jury. State v. McFall, 67 N.M. 260, 263, 354 P.2d 547, 549 (1960). Defendant fails to persuade us, however, that the trial court erred in finding a lack of bias on his jury. Defendant’s speculative argument primarily relies on cases in which extraneous information reached the jury, which creates a presumption of prejudice. State v. Sacoman, 107 N.M. 588, 591, 762 P.2d 250, 253 (1988) (stating that extraneous information improperly considered during deliberations creates a presumption of prejudice) (disapproved of on other grounds by State v. Mann, 2002-NMSC-001, ¶ 24, 131 N.M. 459, 39 P.3d 124); State v. Pettigrew, 116 N.M. 135, 140, 860 P.2d 777, 782 (Ct.App.1993) (<HOLDING>); State v. Perea, 95 N.M. 777, 778-79, 626 P.2d

A: recognizing that presumption of prejudice was triggered by jurors unauthorized contact with intern
B: recognizing a presumption of reasonableness
C: recognizing this presumption
D: holding that a common law presumption of death is triggered after an absence of seven years
A.