With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a more probing investigation, which included reporting the vehicle identification number and checking if the vehicle was reported stolen. When he was told there was a handgun in the vehicle he ordered the occupants to get out and produce identification. It was at this time that Pena-Montes began lying to the officers about his identity. His story did not make sense and the information he provided could not be confirmed. Ultimately, his lies led to his arrest. Because the information he challenges — his identity' — was obtained "as a part of a routine booking or processing procedure” it is not subject to the exclusionary rule. United States v. Olivares-Rangel, 458 F.3d 1104, 1112-16 (10th Cir.2006). 5 . See also Arizona v. Johnson, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 781, 784, 172 L.Ed.2d 694 (2009) (<HOLDING>). 6 . "Police may search a vehicle incident to

A: holding that an officer may order a passenger out of a vehicle during a stop for a traffic infraction
B: holding an officer may order a passenger to get out of a car during a traffic stop and may frisk a passenger for weapons if the officer reasonably suspects the passenger is armed and dangerous
C: holding that a passenger ordered by police to get back onto the vehicle that she voluntarily exited was not an unreasonable seizure because a police officer has the power to reasonably control the situation by requiring a passenger to remain in a vehicle during a traffic stop
D: holding that a passenger has standing to challenge a stops constitutionality because the passenger is seized from the moment a car is stopped
B.