With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". disability benefits, .as limited in section 440.15. We agree with Claimant, and reverse. In Okeechobee Health Care v. Collins, 726 So.2d 775 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), this court held that an award of any combination of temporary total disability benefits and temporary partial benefits is limited to a maximum of 104 weeks. As authority for this proposition, these cases rely on section 440.15(2)(a) and (4), which expressly limit the number of weeks a claimant may be awarded temporary benefits before reaching MMI. Here, however, Claimant received temporary rehabilitative benefits after reaching MMI, as specifically contemplated by section 440.491. See Ring Power Corp. v. Campbell, 697 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)(<HOLDING>). We therefore reverse, holding that Claimant

A: holding that claimant was not entitled to tpd benefits after reaching mmi
B: holding that claimant may simultaneously receive unemployment benefits and workers compensation for temporary partial disability where statute only precludes receipt of workers compensation for temporary total or permanent total disability if claimant is receiving unemployment benefits
C: holding that workers compensation statutes do not prohibit claimant from receiving permanent partial disability benefits from prior accident concurrently with temporary total disability benefits from subsequent injury
D: holding that once the division of workers compensation authorized rehabilitative training concomitant temporary total benefits up to 26 weeks were mandatory even though the claimant had reached mmi
D.