With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of unconscionability based upon the UCC is preempted by § 301 of the LMRA. In Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck, 471 U.S. 202, 105 S.Ct. 1904, 85 L.Ed.2d 206 (1985), the Supreme Court held that the policies underlying § 301 “require that the relationships created by a collective bargaining agreement be defined by application of an evolving federal common law grounded in national labor policy,” so that “questions relating to what the parties to a labor agreement agreed, and wha l Union of North America, 2 Fed.Appx. 157, 160 (2d Cir.2001) (“Section 301 of the [LMRA] confers jurisdiction in the federal courts for ‘[s]uits] for violation of contracts between ... labor organizations.’ Such suits based upon the terms of union constitutions fall within the sweep of § 301.”) (citation omitted) (<HOLDING>). While “[t]he principles for deciding when a

A: holding that the plaintiffs acted on behalf of all union members and reimbursing the attorneys fees from the union treasury such that all union members in effect equally contributed to the costs of litigation
B: holding union members state law claims for defamation against union preempted
C: recognizing union members vital concern in preserving jobs for union members
D: holding that a rico action by union members was properly dismissed where any financial improprieties occurred with union funds and directly injured solely the union
B.