With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". that the use of the mails will follow in the ordinary course of business, or where such use can reasonably be foreseen, even though not actually intended.’ ” Altman, 48 F.3d at 102-03 (quoting Per-eira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8-9, 74 S.Ct. 358, 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954)) (alteration in original). We hold that this requirement was easily satisfied here given that the settlement checks issued by the insurance companies (i.e., the fruition of the scheme) were sent by mail. In addition, several of the bribes were invoiced and paid by mad. Finally, the appellants’ mandatory filings with the New York State Office of Court Administration, which were adulterated to help conceal the fraud, were sent by mail. See Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705, 712, 109 S.Ct. 1443, 103 L.Ed.2d 734 (1989) (<HOLDING>). Appellants argue that their prosecution under

A: recognizing that proof of a business system of preparing and mailing letters and compliance with such a custom in the particular instance is sufficient to establish proof of mailing
B: holding that rule 6e is inapplicable where the time for filing begins to run on the date of mailing
C: holding that mailing of titleregistration forms satisfied mailing requirement because they contributed to success of the scheme
D: recognizing that a mailing must be sufficiently related to the fraudulent scheme to support a charge of mail fraud
C.