With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a duty to retreat upon a defendant engaged in unlawful activity. See Andujar-Ruiz v. State, 205 So.3d 803, 806-07 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (citing, inter alia, Little, 111 So.3d at 220-22; Dorsey v. State, 149 So.3d 144, 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)); cf. Miles v. State, 162 So.3d 169, 171-72 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (“[Ujnder the prior Stand Your Ground law, a defendant could assert immunity under section 776.012 even if he or she was engaged in an unlawful act at the time.”); Garrett v. State, 148 So.3d 466, 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (“The fact that [defendant] was a convicted felon in unlawful possession of a firearm did not apply to the jury’s consideration of whether [defendant] had a duty to retreat under section 776.012(1).”); Hill v. State, 143 So.3d 981, 985-86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (en banc) (<HOLDING>); Pages v. Seliman-Tapia, 134 So.3d 536, 539

A: holding that a person engaged in an unlawful activity such as possession of an illegal firearm by a felon would not be entitled to claim immunity under section 7760321 based on the use of force as permitted in section 7760133
B: holding that the application of section 776012 is not limited to persons not engaged in unlawful activity
C: holding that defendant need not establish that he was not engaged in unlawful activity under section 776012
D: holding states are not persons for the purposes of section 1983
B.