With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". annual reports, Motorola observes that Fu-jifilm maintained substantial reserves (over $2 billion) throughout the period of infringement. Id. at 3; Mody Decl. ¶ 4. Fujifilm responds that a review of its annual reports “reveals that [it] was only able to maintain its [cash] reserves through continuous and substantial cost reductions and structured reforms.” Rule 59 Reply at 4-5 (Dkt. No. 374). Fujifilm also points out that the Federal Circuit has squarely held that “it is not necessary that a patentee demonstrate that it borrowed at the prime rate in order to be entitled to prejudgment interest at that rate.” Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 939 F.2d 1540, 1545 (Fed.Cir.1991); see also Studiengesellschaft Kohle, m.b.H. v. Dart Indus., Inc., 862 F.2d 1564, 1579-80 (Fed.Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>) (internal quotation marks omitted). I find

A: holding that the proper rate for prejudgment interest is the rate fixed by the parties in a contract
B: holding that a patentee does not have to make an affirmative demonstration ie proof of borrowing at or above primeto be entitled to an award of prejudgment interest at the prime rate
C: holding that award and rate of prejudgment interest are within trial courts discretion
D: holding that it is proper to award prejudgment interest at the legal rate from the date the monies were due under the contract
B.