With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 150 B.R. 912, 916 (W.D.N.C.1992) (enjoining Interstate Commerce Commission); In re Richmond Paramedical Servs., Inc., 94 B.R. 881, 882 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1988) (enjoining Department of Health and Human Services); In re Vantage Petroleum Corp., 25 B.R. 471, 477 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1982) (enjoining Department of Energy). Caselaw also supports, in appropriate circumstances, use by the bankruptcy court of section 105(a) of the Code to prohibit conduct otherwise permitted by virtue of one of the exceptions to the automatic stay of section 362(b). See In re Fussell, 928 F.2d 712, 713 (5th Cir.1991) (determining that criminal proceedings may be enjoined); In re Techs. Int’l Holdings, Inc., 234 B.R. 699, 702 (Bankr.E.D.Ky.1999) (enjoining state); In re Richmond Paramedical Servs., Inc., 94 B.R. at 882 (<HOLDING>); In re Sec. Gas & Oil, Inc., 70 B.R. 786, 792

A: holding that bankruptcy court could not enjoin third party tort claims that would not affect estate
B: holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code
C: holding that bankruptcy court may enjoin federal administrative proceedings when they threaten the debtors estate
D: holding that bankruptcy court may enjoin state environmental reclamation order
C.