With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(a)- provides, “Unless charged with a capital offense or an offense punishable by life imprisonment and the proof of guilt is evident or the presumption is great, every person charged with a crime or violation of municipal or county ordinance shall be entitled to pretrial release on reasonable conditions.” Therefore, in order for an offense to be non-bondable, it must be either a capital offense or an offense punishable by life imprisonment. There is no requirement that the police establish probable cause, to arrest for the specific charge announced at the time of the arrest, or for the charge cited in the arrest report. All that is required is probable cause to arrest for any criminal offense. See Lee v. Ferraro, 284 F.3d 1188, 1195 (11th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Jeanty v. City of Miami, 876 F.Supp.2d 1334,

A: holding that officer had probable cause to arrest for violation of ordinance and that officers failure to cite ordinance either orally or in his arrest report was irrelevant
B: holding that probable cause existed to arrest for a seatbelt violation under state law
C: holding that arrest was unsupported by probable cause but granting qualified immunity to defendants who made the arrest in reliance on communications with other officers
D: holding that the courts determination of whether an officer had probable cause for an arrest is an independent and objective determination and an officers own subjective reason for the arrest is irrelevant
A.