With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". These facts would indicate that the pills were illegitimate. Zayyad also hid the pills in his van and evidently had help in destroying additional pill evidence at his home. The later attempt to conceal the pills further indicates awareness that the pills were unlawful. See United States v. Sasso, 695 F.3d 25, 29 (1st Cir.2012) (“[A]n attempt to cover up the commission of a crime implies consciousness of guilt. Here, the jurors could reasonably infer consciousness of guilt (and, thus, intent) from the defendant’s endeavor to conceal his possession of the [instrument of the crime.]” (internal citations omitted)). All these facts allowed the jury to infer knowledge of false pills on Zayyad’s part. See, e.g., United States v. Hassan, 280 Fed.Appx. 271, 274 (4th Cir.2008) (unpublished) (<HOLDING>). At the very least, a jury could have

A: holding that evidence supported counterfeit drug convictions where among other things 1 defendant admitted he obtained pills from an illegitimate source 2 pills came in illegitimate packaging and 3 pills came in abundant supply
B: holding that record compelled conclusion that telephoned threat came from persecutors in absence of evidence to the contrary
C: holding that a credibility determination based on among other things a tendency to exaggerate was supported by substantial evidence
D: holding individual defendant liable where he among other things made inquiries into the business obligations under the flsa
A.