With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Mr. Mayberry remain at L4 status, determined that Mr. Mayberry should retroactively be demoted to LI status for disciplinary reasons and should suffer a consequent loss of good-time credits. The auditor removed those credits without notice, without a hearing, and without a disciplinary committee’s determination that Mr. Mayberry had committed an infraction, violating both state law and the procedures set forth in Waldon and Wolff. The district court erred in holding that Mr. Mayberry had no liberty interest in the good-time credits due to the auditor’s opinion that they were “mistakenly” earned, and must be reversed. Because the DOC removed the credits without notice or an opportunity for a hearing, it must restore the credits. See Brown v. Smith, 828 F.2d 1493, 1495 (10th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). The motion to proceed in forma pauperis in

A: holding that inmate who demonstrates that due process rights were violated may use  2241 as remedy to restore goodtime credits
B: holding that a prisoner who challenged prison procedures used to deny him goodtime credits and not actual denial of those credits stated a cognizable claim under  1983
C: holding that inmates serving life terms were not entitled to goodtime credits because state statute expressly foreclosed the granting of goodtime credits to such inmates
D: holding that a prisoner cannot be deprived of a protected liberty interest in goodtime credits without procedural due process
A.