With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. Alfonso Jenkins petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. This Court ordered Jenkins to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing successive pro se motions in this Court. See Carter v. State, 1 So.3d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (<HOLDING>). After considering Jenkins’ response to this

A: holding that pro se pleadings will be liberally construed
B: holding that a defendant proceeding pro se is bound by same rules as party represented by counsel and a court cannot allow pro se litigant lower standard of performance
C: holding a court can restrict future pro se pleadings if it first provides a pro se litigant notice and an opportunity to respond
D: holding that pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed
C.