With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". motion for May 2nd. On April 27th, Mocega’s attorney filed a motion for a thirty-day extension to obtain an expert report. See Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat. Ann. Art. 4590i, § 13.01(g). Other than the affidavits already on file, no evidence was offered at the May 2nd hearing. At the conclusion, the trial court revoked his reconsideration order of April 25th. In a written order, the trial court stated two grounds: (1) appellant’s counsel had notice of the April 3rd submission setting, and (2) the thirty-day grace period of section 13.01(g) could not extend more than 210 days after filing. Being only human, the trial court could not have foreseen our opinion several months later rejecting the second ground. See Pfeiffer v. Jacobs, 29 S.W.3d 193, 197 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). Based on Pfeif-fer, Mocega’s first point must

A: holding that a motion to continue a hearing on a postjudgment motion was ineffective to extend the period for the trial court to rule on the motion absent the express consent of the parties
B: holding 30day grace period could begin at any time so long as it was filed before the hearing on the defendant doctors motion to dismiss
C: holding that the defendant waived any argument on the issue by failing to oppose a motion to dismiss
D: holding that defendant abandoned his motion by failing to pursue it within a reasonable time after it was filed
B.