With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". appellate courts must review the issue under the plain-error doctrine); Wheeler, 327 Ga. App. at 318 (3); King v. State, 317 Ga. App. 834, 836-37 (1) (733 SE2d 21) (2012). 45 Minor v. State, 328 Ga. App. 128, 132 (2) (a) (761 SE2d 538) (2014) (punctuation omitted); see Drayton v. State, 297 Ga. 743, 748-49 (2) (b) (778 SE2d 179) (2015) (explaining that before a jury charge will be considered reversible error, it must be considered in the context of the jury instructions as a whole). 46 Green v. State, 291 Ga. 287, 294 (8) (a) (728 SE2d 668) (2012) (punctuation omitted); accord Madison v. State, 329 Ga. App. 856, 865 (2) (766 SE2d 206) (2014); Williams v. State, 303 Ga. App. 222, 230-31 (6) (692 SE2d 820) (2010). 47 See Flournoy v. State, 294 Ga. 741, 743-44 (2) (755 SE2d 777) (2014) (<HOLDING>); Wheeler, 327 Ga. App. at 319-20 (3) (same).

A: holding that a challenged jury instruction did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof when the trial court elsewhere instructed the jury that the state must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt
B: holding state must prove every element of an offense beyond a reasonable doubt and a scheme that shifts the burden of proof to the defendant by presuming a fact upon proof of the other elements of the offense violates due process
C: holding that even when a jury instruction is defective such a defect is cured when the court provides the jury with the indictment and instructs jurors that the burden of proof rests upon the state to prove every material allegation of the indictment and every essential element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt
D: holding that an allegation as to the time of the offense is not an essential element of the offense charged in the indictment and within reasonable time limits proof of any date before the return of the indictment and within the statute of limitations is sufficient
C.