With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". convictions that qualified as “violent felonies” under the ACCA and was therefore subject to a fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). The district court sentenced Woods to 235 months. One of Woods’s three ACCA predicate offenses was a conviction for attempted burglary, which at the time qualified as a violent felony under the ACCA’s residual clause because it created a “serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). In Johnson, however, the Supreme Court held the ACCA’s residual clause was unconstitutionally vague. 135 S.Ct. at 2557. The government concedes that under Johnson, Woods’s conviction for attempted burglary is no longer a predicate offense under the ACCA. We may authorize a second or successive petition unde r.2015) (<HOLDING>); In re Rivero, 797 F.3d 986, 989 (11th

A: holding the supreme court has not held in a case or a combination of cases that the rule in johnson is retroactive to cases on collateral review and therefore it has not made johnson retroactive
B: holding that until the supreme court rules otherwise apprendi is not a new rule of constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral review  that was previously unavailable
C: holding johnson announced a new substantive rule and prior supreme court holdings make it retroactive
D: holding that cage has been made retroactive to cases on collateral review
A.