With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". fraud alleged must be of an extreme nature, that goes to one of the essentials of marriage.”); Stegienko v. Stegienko, 295 Mich. 530, 295 N.W. 252, 254 (1940) (noting fraud must be “of a nature wholly subversive of the true essence of the marriage relationship” to support annulment of marriage). Several courts have held that the nondisclosure of a prior marriage and divorce does not qualify as an extreme enough fraud to annul a marriage. See Attor, 894 A.2d at 88 (citing Gerard v. Distefano, 84 N.J.Super. 396, 202 A.2d 220 (1964) (“The nondisclosure of a prior marriage and divorce is not such a fraud, for it in no way impedes the carrying out of the marital obligations and does not go to the fundamentals of the relationship.”)); Hess v. Pettigrew, 261 Mich. 618, 247 N.W. 90, 92 (1933) (<HOLDING>). However, at least one jurisdiction has held

A: holding that denial of leave to amend is error in the absence of justifying reasons
B: recognizing that basis for deportation was aliens misrepresentation about his marriage not the validity of his marriage
C: holding concealment of prior marriage is generally not fraud justifying annulment
D: holding that the law to be applied in determining the validity of  an outofstate marriage is the law of the state in which the marriage occurred
C.