With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". others at least in certain circumstances allowed the plaintiff to recover for the full two-year backpay period specified in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(g)(l), e.g., Goodwin, 275 F.3d at 1011 (misreading Ashley as agreeing with this result), Anderson, 180 F.3d at 335-37. The Second Circuit never addressed the issue in the context of Title VII, but pr e-Morgan decisions under other statutes suggest it would have adopted the majority position. See Connolly v. McCall, 254 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2001) (relying on Bazemore in holding in a § 1983 case that "application of a discrimina-toiy policy” within the limitations period preserves a claim against that policy, even if the policy was instituted outside the limitations period); Pollis v. New School for Social Research, 132 F.3d 115, 119 (2d Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); Kim v. Dial Serv. Int’l, Inc., 159 F.3d 1347

A: holding that to establish a prima facie equal pay act claim the plaintiff must show that the jobs being compared are substantially equal
B: holding that the mere allegation that a female professor was paid less than a male colleague for equal work stated a claim under the equal pay act
C: holding that judges comments to jury during equal pay act trial were harmless error
D: holding that equal pay act claims reaccrue with the receipt of each challenged paycheck
D.