With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". approximately one-month period of prolonged pain and disability. Foster, 303 S.W.3d at 840-41. We held that the report was adequate as to this claim. Id. Richardson is not required to perfect a second interlocutory appeal in order to require the trial court to give effect to our judgment and mandate in Foster. Requiring Richardson to pursue a second interlocutory appeal to obtain relief we have already granted in a prior interlocutory appeal is not an adequate remedy at law. See Columbia Med. Ctr., 306 S.W.3d at 248 (explaining that “[b]ecause this issue arises in connection with a final judgment following an appeal to this Court, we conclude that Columbia now has no other adequate remedy by appeal”); see generally In re Masonite Corp., 997 S.W.2d 194, 198 (Tex.1999) (orig. proceeding) (<HOLDING>). V. Conclusion Because the trial court’s

A: recognizing that an appellate court reviews a trial courts decision whether or not to grant equitable relief only for an abuse of discretion
B: holding that where the final judgment provided relief that was not requested  its entry constituted reversible error
C: recognizing appellate remedy inadequate when trial courts abuse of discretion constituted automatic reversible error
D: holding that the judges entry into the jury room constituted reversible error
C.