With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". order within 30 days after its entry, if no appeal has been taken.” Commonwealth v. Klein, 566 Pa. 396, 781 A.2d 1133, 1135 (2001) (citing 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5505). However, the court has “inherent powers to amend its records, to correct mistakes of the clerk or other officer of the court, inadvertencies of counsel, or supply defects or omissions in the record, even after the lapse of the [thirty day] term.” Id. (citations omitted). Included among these exceptional circumstances to Section 5505’s jurisdictional time limits is where the court sua sponte corrects an illegal sentence originally imposed, even after the defendant has begun serving the original sentence. Commonwealth v. Santone, 757 A.2d 963 (Pa.Super.2000); Commonwealth v. Quinlan, 433 Pa.Super. 111, 639 A.2d 1235, 1239 (1994) (<HOLDING>). See also In the Interest of K.R.B., 851 A.2d

A: recognizing respective challenges of an illegal patently contradictory or fraudulently procured sentence as excepted from the jurisdictional time limit imposed by section 5505
B: holding that the crossappeal time limit is jurisdictional
C: holding that the thirty day time limit was mandatory but not jurisdictional
D: holding that a time limit for filing a complaint as a creditor in bankruptcy proceedings is not jurisdictional
A.