With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". dissolution failed to allege either that parties maintained a marital domicile in Florida or that former wife resided in Florida, service of process upon former wife under long-arm statute was void); Shefer v. Shefer, 440 So.2d 1319, 1319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)(finding that since it was undisputed that the parties never maintained a marital domicile in Florida, long-arm personal service over the wife was an impossibility under section 48.193(3)). Personal jurisdiction, however, is not required in order for the Florida court to adjudicate the petition to the extent that it seeks dissolution, see Arnstein v. Amstein, 422 So.2d 1052, 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), nor to the extent that it seeks custody of the parties’ minor children, see Warfield v. Warfield, 661 So.2d 924, 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)(<HOLDING>), review denied, 669 So.2d 252 (Fla.1996),

A: holding that personal jurisdiction is not required to make an outofstate parent a party to custody action where the state court has subject matter jurisdiction under the uniform child custody jurisdiction act
B: holding that a trial courts decision on whether to exercise jurisdiction in a proceeding under the uniform child custody and jurisdiction enforcement act is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
C: holding that unlike subject matter jurisdiction personal jurisdiction may be waived
D: holding that without personal jurisdiction over one parent a court could still decide custody of a child living in the state but could not determine support and visitation
A.