With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". although the exclusion of attorney’s fees from a statute usually would not allow an award of attorney’s fees, under the “lemon law” a different conclusion was intended). As a result of the approach taken by the drafters of the Uniform Act, most jurisdictions interpreting it have found the language of AR.S. § 12-1514 permits the award of attorney’s fees incurred in confirmation proceedings despite the absence of any language expressly authorizing attorney’s fees. See, e.g., Anchorage Medical & Surgical Clinic v. James, 555 P.2d 1320, 1324 (Aaska 1976); County of Clark v. Blanchard Constr. Co., 98 Nev. 488, 492, 653 P.2d 1217, 1220 (1982); Wachtel v. Shoney’s, Inc., 830 S.W.2d 905 (Tenn.Ct.App.1991). But see Floors, Inc. v. B.G. Danis, Inc., 380 Mass. 91, 100, 401 N.E.2d 839, 844 (1980) (<HOLDING>). The Nevada Supreme Court, referring to the

A: holding that lexis fees are not taxable as costs but reserving ruling on whether such fees are recoverable as attorneys fees
B: holding that fees associated with obtaining and confirming the arbitration award are not recoverable
C: holding attorneys fees not generally recoverable unless party prevails under cause of action for which attorneys fees are recoverable and damages are recovered
D: holding that salaries of management and personnel are recoverable as indirect costs associated with general operation of response action
B.