With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Judgment of Sentence Affirmed; Ineffectiveness Claim Dismissed Without Prejudice. ¶ 19 BENDER, J. CONCURS IN THE RESULT. 1 . 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 2502(a). 2 . 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3701(a)(l)(i). 3 . 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6106(a)(1). 4 . 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6108. 5 . 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 907(a). 6 . In phrasing his sixth issue the way he did, Appellant paradoxically states there was sufficient evidence to sustain the charges, though his intent was obviously to aver the evidence was insufficient. 7 . In that case, this Court held that a concise statement which is too vague to apprise the trial court of the issues raised is “the functional equivalent of no Concise Statement at all.” Id. at 37. 8 . Superseded by statute and Overruled in part by Commonwealth v. Goodwin, 928 A.2d 287, 293 (Pa.Super.2007) (en banc) (<HOLDING>). 9 . We are cognizant of our Supreme Court’s

A: holding that the new subsection of parap 1925c4 permits an attorney seeking to withdraw from a criminal matter to file a parap1925b statement indicating that there are no nonfrivolous matters that can be raised on appeal in lieu of a concise statement of errors complained of on appeal pursuant to anders v california 386 us 738 87 sct 1396 18 led2d 493 1967 thus allowing this court to make an independent examination of the record on appeal to determine whether there were nonfrivolous issues to consider
B: holding that in order to preserve their claims for appellate review appellants must comply whenever the trial court orders them to file a statement of matters complained of on appeal pursuant to pa rap 1925b any issues not raised in a parap 1925b statement will be deemed waived
C: holding that where a trial court directs a defendant to file a concise statement pursuant to parap 1925 any issues not raised in that statement shall be waived
D: holding that issue not raised in a statement filed pursuant to parap 1925b is waived for purposes of appeal
A.