With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the guideline range was the same: 360 months to life imprisonment. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual ch. 5, pt. A (2014) (Sentencing Table). Thus, the amendment to the drug-quantity tables did not affect Mr. Norwood’s guideline range. In these circumstances, Mr. Norwood cannot obtain a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C: § 3582(c)(2). See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § lB1.10(a)(2)(B) (2014) (“A reduction in the defendant’s term of imprisonment is not consistent with this policy statement and therefore is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) if ... an amendment ... does not have the effect of lowering the defendant’s applicable guideline range.”); see also United States v. Sharkey, 543 F.3d 1236, 1239 (10th Cir.2008) (stating that because a guideline amendmen 6 (10th Cir.2014) (<HOLDING>). Amendment 782 reduces the base-offense level

A: holding that a defendant cannot collaterally attack his sentence under 18 usc  3582c2
B: holding that crimes subject to a minimum sentence of 15 years under 18 usc  924e1 are properly characterized as class a felonies under 18 usc  3559
C: holding that 18 usc  1919 did not implicitly repeal 18 usc  1001
D: holding that appellant hjaving failed to exercise administrative appeal  cannot now collaterally attack the tax deficiency determination in an independent action
A.