With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". even when the state legislature has enacted an anti-discrimination statute which limits the size of the employer covered by the statute. See, e.g., Molesworth v. Brandon, 341 Md. 621, 672 A.2d 608 (1996) (upholding Maryland’s common law cause of action for wrongful discharge of an employee based on sex discrimination against an employer with less than 15 employees where public policy against sex discrimination was evidenced by constitutional amendment, statutes, and executive order); accord Thurdin v. SEI Boston, LLC, 452 Mass. 436, 895 N.E.2d 446 (2008) (concluding employee may bring claim for sex discrimination under state equal rights act where employer was not covered by Massachusetts’ state employment discrimination law); Collins v. Rizkana, 73 Ohio St.3d 65, 652 N.E.2d 653 (1995) (<HOLDING>); Williamson v. Greene, 200 W.Va. 421, 490

A: recognizing tort of wrongful discharge
B: recognizing common law tort claim for wrongful discharge in violation of ohio public policy based upon statutory and judicial sources
C: recognizing that a texas common law claim for retaliatory discharge is a claim sounding in tort
D: recognizing tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy
B.