With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". arguably below the norm. See Meyenburg v. Exxon Mobil Corp., No. 05-cv-15 DGW, 2006 WL 2191422, at *2 (S.D.Ill. July 31, 2006) (“33 1/3% to 40% (plus the cost of litigation) is the standard contingent fee percentages in this legal marketplace for comparable commercial litigation”). Indeed, using the market percentage method in the courts of the Seventh Circuit, as one court has observed, results in awards of attorney’s fees “equal to approximately one-third or more of the recovery.” Teamsters Local Union No. 601 v. Inter-Rail Transport, Inc., 02-cv-1109 DRH, 2004 WL 768658, at *1 (S.D.Ill. Mar. 19, 2004) (“In this Circuit, a fee award of thirty-three and one-third (33 1/3%) in a class action in [sic] not uncommon”); see also In re Mexico Money Transfer Litig., 164 F.Supp.2d at 1033 (<HOLDING>); Spicer v. Chicago Bd. Options Exch., Inc.,

A: recognizing that an appeal filed within 30 days of the entry of an order awarding attorney fees was timely filed as to the issue of attorney fees
B: recognizing the established 30 benchmark for an award of fees in class actions
C: holding proper basis for award of fees
D: holding that a class action tolls the statute of limitations only for subsequent individual actions not for subsequent class actions
B.