With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by the First Amendment. Ex parte Dave, 220 S.W.3d at 156, citing Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, 69, 93 S.Ct. 2628, 2641, 37 L.Ed.2d 446 (1973). The Supreme Court has expressly rejected the argument that the constitutionally-protected right to possess obscene material in the privacy of the home creates a correlative right to receive it, transport it, or distribute it. U.S. v. Orito, 413 U.S. 139, 141, 93 S.Ct. 2674, 2677, 37 L.Ed.2d 513 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8mm. Film, 413 U.S. 123, 128, 93 S.Ct. 2665, 2669, 37 L.Ed.2d 500 (1973); United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs, 402 U.S. 363, 376, 91 S.Ct. 1400, 1408, 28 L.Ed.2d 822 (1971); see also, United States v. Reidel, 402 U.S. 351, 356, 91 S.Ct. 1410, 1412-13, 28 L.Ed.2d 813 (1971)(<HOLDING>). Appellant argues that the United States

A: holding that for purposes of federal constitutional law a person does not possess a reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to trash discarded outside the home
B: holding that constitutionallyprotected right to possess obscene material in the privacy of the home does not require that the court fashion or recognize a constitutional right for commercial purveyors of obscene material to distribute or sell it
C: holding that a waiver of right occurs only when one in possession of a right with full knowledge of the material facts does or forebears the doing of something inconsistent with the exercise of the right
D: holding that while an individual has a right to possess obscene material in the privacy of his home there is no corresponding privacy right to purchase such material
B.