With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Energy, Inc., 188 F.3d 116, 122 (3d Cir.1999). As the relevant facts are undisputed, this appeal presents a pure question of law, which we review de novo. See id. II. A. Section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides: For the purpose of distribution under this title, a claim arising from rescission of a purchase or sale of a security of the debtor or of an affiliate of the debtor, for damages arising from the purchase or sale of such a security, or for reimbursement or contribution allowed under section 502 on account of such a claim, shall be subordinated to all claims or interests that are senior to or equal the claim or interest represented by such security, except that if such security is common stock, such claim has the same priority as common stock. In this ca Bankr.S.D.Fla.1999) (<HOLDING>). In construing § 510(b), we begin, as we must,

A: holding that a claim for breach of a provision in a merger agreement arises from the purchase or sale of the debtors securities
B: holding that plaims for breach of a merger agreement arise from the purchase or sale of debtors securities
C: holding that claims alleging that the debtor fraudulently induced the claimants to retain securities they had purchased from the debtor arise from the purchase or sale of those securities for purposes of  510b
D: holding that claims for breach of the debtors agreement to use its best efforts to register its securities arise from the purchase of those securities for purposes of  510b
D.