With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Appellant contends that the trial court erred by delaying the appointment of appellate counsel and that her trial counsel committed ineffective assistance. Appellant does not challenge the constitutionality of section 263.405® of the Texas Family Code. Appellant’s two points on appeal do not appear in her statement of points or motion for new trial. Historically, this court has held that the absence of a point from a statement of points, and, indeed, the absence of a statement of points, does not deprive us of the ability to review an issue on appeal in a termination case. In response to this line of cases and similar cases from other intermediate appellate courts, the legislature enacted section 263.405(i). In the appeal of a final order in a terminatio rt Worth 2002, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). 2 . See In re E.A.R., 201 S.W.3d 813, 815,

A: holding statement of points in notice of appeal sufficient
B: holding an argument to be waived for inadequate briefing and failure to raise the issue in the statement of points on appeal
C: holding failure to timely file statement of points does not forfeit issues on appeal
D: holding failure to file statement of points is no bar to appeal
C.