With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(l) (2007). Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1409(a) (2007). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The issue is whether the debt owed by Defendants to Plaintiff should be non-dischargeable based upon Mr. Baker’s submission of the false Financial Statement under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(B). Under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(B), a debtor may not be granted a discharge from any debt for money, property, services, or an extension, renewal, or refinancing of credit procured by a statement in writing (1) that is materially false; (2) respecting debtor’s financial condition; (3) on which the creditor reasonably relied; and (4) that debtor made or published with intent to deceive. 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(B) (2007); In re Sawyer, 76 B.R. 201 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1987) (<HOLDING>); Insurance Co. of N.Am. v. Cohn (In re Cohn),

A: holding that plaintiff failed to prove reasonable reliance on a false statement
B: holding that each class member was not required to prove justifiable reliance when an inference of reliance arises if a materially false representation was made to persons whose acts thereafter were consistent with reliance upon the representations
C: holding that reasonable reliance is not an element of the defense
D: holding that for a section 10b violation the sec must prove that the defendant in connection with the purchase or sale of securities made a materially false statement or omitted a material fact with scienter and that the plaintiffs reliance on the defendants action caused injury to the plaintiff
A.