With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". were “similarly situated [to her] in ah rele vant respects .” Lynn, 160 F.3d at 487. The district court rejected Bogren’s reliance on comparable-trooper evidence because, with the exception of one officer, all of the troopers to whom Bogren compared herself were beyond the probationary period and were thus governed by a collective bargaining agreement. The court reasoned the collective bargaining agreement, with its attendant grievance procedures, would' create a different response by the patrol in disciplining or terminating those officers. We agree with the premise underlying the district court’s conclusion; troopers beyond the probationary period are not similarly situated to a probationary trooper. See Blanding v. Pennsylvania State Police, 12 F.3d 1303, 1309-10 (3d Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); see also Ghane v. West, 148 F.3d 979, 982

A: holding that arguments that are not raised or that are not accompanied by factual and legal support are deemed waived
B: recognizing that individuals are generally not similarly situated when different decision makers are involved in the respective disciplinary action
C: recognizing that tenured troopers are not similarly situated to probationary troopers
D: recognizing that act and wetlands regulations are generally applicable to all similarly situated property owners and cannot be viewed as being directed solely at the plaintiffs
C.