With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (Doc. # 3214), p. 46. I do not agree with the Equity Committee’s position regarding compliance with state law, including the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 1123(a) unequivocally states that the provisions which a plan shall contain is “[njotwithstanding any otherwise applicable non-bankruptcy law.” The quoted language clearly means, and case law so holds, that the provisions of a plan as articulated in § 1123(a) can be effected without regard to otherwise applicable nonbankruptcy law, including the corporation law of the State of Delaware or any other state corporation laws having bearing on the debtors. 7 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1123.LH[4], p. 1123-27 (15th ed. rev.2002). See e.g. Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc. (In re FCX, Inc.), 853 F.2d 1149, 1154 (4th Cir.1988)(<HOLDING>); In re Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 283 B.R.

A: holding that in construing statute courts must first look to its plain language
B: holding  1123a5d overrides nonbankruptcy law by its plain language
C: holding when ordinance language is clear courts must give language its plain meaning
D: holding that when the contract language is unambiguous we take these words to represent the parties intent and the plain meaning of this language governs its interpretation
B.