With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". importance if the nature of the action makes it capable of repetition and yet prevents effective judicial review. Thus, a common element of both the public interest exception and the capable of repetition exception is that the complained of action be capable of repetition yet not effectively reviewable. Even if we were to recognize a public interest exception to the mootness doctrine, this case does not meet the suggested requirements. Id. The Texas Supreme Court has as yet not recognized the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine and judicial restraint compels us to wait until that court decides to resolve the split in authority in the intermediate appellate courts. See, e.g., Securtec, Inc. v. County of Gregg, 106 S.W.3d 803, 810-11 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2003, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>); State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v.

A: recognizing such an exception
B: recognizing exception
C: recognizing the public interest exception
D: recognizing public policy exception to atwill doctrine
C.