With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel can be brought for the first time on post-conviction, but only if it requires fact-finding outside of the direct appeal record .... ” (emphasis added and citations omitted)); Turrentine v. State of Oklahoma, 965 P.2d 985, 987-88 (Okla.Crim.App.) (“In Propositions II and IV, [Petitioner] argues he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel.... Despite the procedural bar of res judicata, a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel can be brought for the first time on post-conviction, but only if it requires fact-finding outside of the direct appeal record.” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 624, 142 L.Ed.2d 562 (1998). Cf. United States v. Galloway, 56 F.3d 1239, 1242-43 (10th Cir.1995) (in banc), (<HOLDING>) Turning then to the second prong of Kimmelman,

A: holding that an ineffectiveassistanceofcounsel claim may be brought in a collateral proceeding under  2255 whether or not the petitioner could have raised the claim on direct appeal
B: holding that the appellate standard of review of ineffectiveness claim is de novo
C: holding that the fact that an ineffectiveness claim is raised and adjudicated on direct appeal will not procedurally bar an ineffectiveness claim in a proceeding under 28 usc  2255 where new reasons are advanced in support of that claim
D: holding ineffectivetrialassistance claim may be brought in 28 usc  2255 proceeding regardless of whether claim could have been raised on direct appeal
C.