With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". school. Id. at 280. And the defendant noted the school district would have paid as much to another driver performing the same job. Rejecting these arguments, the Eighth Circuit held: What the School District wanted was a competent school-bus driver who was truthful and had not been convicted of a felony, and this is not what it got. The School District has been deprived of money in the very elementary sense that its money has gone to a person who would not have received it if all of the facts had been known. Id. at 280. The court concluded the school district had been deprived of its property, too, because it had a choice in how to spend its money and the defendant’s misrepresentations induced it to part with that money under false pretenses. Id.; see also Bunn, 26 Fed.Appx. at 142 (<HOLDING>); Leahy, 464 F.3d at 787 (same). The defendants

A: holding that where defendant made false representations to attain government contract but performed satisfactorily the government had been deprived of money or property for purposes of mail and wire fraud
B: holding that the defendant could be prosecuted for making false claims against the government under either the false claims statute 18 usc  287 or the mail and wire fraud statutes 18 usc  1341 1343
C: holding that amtrak is an agency of the government  for purposes of the constitutional obligations of government
D: holding that wire and mail fraud statutes are construed identically
A.