With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". - S.W.3d -, -, 2013 WL 5470089, at *6 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 30, 2013, orig. proceeding); Connolly v. Gasmire, 257 S.W.3d 831, 839 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.). 6 . See Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code Ann. §§ governs remedies and procedural matters). 29 . See Pate, 2003 WL 22682422, at * 1-2. 30 . See Tex. Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 445-46; Schwartzott, 403 S.W.3d at 498 n. 4; Trojacek, 2009 WL 909591, at *3; Saudi, 176 S.W.3d at 113. 31 . See Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code Ann. § 21.562; Arkoma Basin Exploration Co., 249 S.W.3d at 387; In re Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., 2013 WL 5470089, at *6; Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 839; Pate, 2003 WL 22682422, at *1-2. 32 . See Tex. Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 445-46; Trojacek, 2009 WL 909591, at *3; Somers, 295 S.W.3d at 8, 10, 13. 33 (<HOLDING>); Cameron Appraisal Dist. v. Rourk, 194 S.W.3d

A: holding that lack of justiciable interest resulted in lack of standing to pursue claim and that lack of standing deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to act
B: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue
C: holding that where one plaintiff has standing we need not consider whether the other individual and corporate plaintiffs have standing to maintain the suit
D: holding that stepgrandfathers suit should be dismissed because he lacked a justiciable interest and standing due to his failure to satisfy the requirements of the applicable standing statute in the family code
D.