With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". period would have on FLSA recoveries, most courts have held that such provisions are unenforceable. See Taylor v. Am. Income Life Ins. Co., No. 1:13 CV 31, 2013 WL 2087359, at *3 (N.D.Ohio May 14, 2013) (refusing to enforce an arbitration agreement that provided for a 30-day period of limitations because it “[d]epriv[ed] an employee of his full recovery by diminishing his right to compensation” and therefore “denie[d] him his substantive rights under the FLSA.”); Pruiett, 2011 WL 5520969, at *5 (“Plaintiffs’ substantive right to full compensation under the FLSA may not be bargained away[,]” and therefore “the contractual limitations period is unenforceable as to FLSA claims.”); see also Wineman v. Durkee Lakes Hunting & Fishing Club, Inc., B52 F.Supp.2d 815, 822 (E.D.Mich.2005) (<HOLDING>). The decision to the contrary, Boaz v. Federal

A: holding that enforcing a contractual limitations period against an flsa claim violates public policy for other reasons
B: holding that placement of a contractual limitations period in a section entitled claims was reasonable
C: holding under flsa
D: holding that the flsa does not preempt a state law contractual claim that seeks to recover wages for time that is compensable under the contract but not under the flsa
A.