With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". as to whether she was wrongfully discharged by BCBS. Therefore, jurors — not judges — must be allowed to make that ultimate determination. We affirm the court of appeals and remand with directions to order a new trial on Maria-m’s wrongful discharge claim. 1 . See infra part III. A, p. 19. 2 . Mariani’s direct supervisor for both her positions and throughout most of her employment with BCBS was Samuel Weidman. 3 . For a brief period applicable to this assertion, Mariani’s supervisor was Joe Donahue. 4 . Ultimately, the documents were not submitted to the Division of Insurance and were used 2d 730, 733 (Ky.1983)(indicating that public policy must be limited to a constitutionally protected right or statute); Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet, 113 Wis.2d 561, 335 N.W.2d 834, 840 (1983) (<HOLDING>). 8 . See, e.g., Boyle v. Vista Eyewear, Inc.,

A: holding that specific statutory provisions take priority over general statutory provisions
B: holding that public policy may be found in letter or purpose of constitutional statutory or regulatory provisions in judicial decisions of state and in certain instances in professional codes of ethics
C: holding that public policy must be evidenced by constitutional or statutory provisions
D: holding that the courts may not declare public policy without a basis in either the constitution or statutory provisions
C.