With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". nor listed as a creditor. Similarly, in Virginia v. Collins (In re Collins), 173 F.3d 924, 929 (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 785, 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000), the court found that there was no Eleventh Amendment suit where the debtors asked for their bankruptcy case to be reopened — but did not directly sue the state — for a determination that certain debts owed the state were discharged pursuant to a previous discharge order. The Walker court noted, however, that “commencement of certain adversary proceedings directly against a state that has not filed a proof of claim in a bankruptcy case would” come within the scope of the Eleventh Amendment. Walker, 142 F.3d at 823; see also Maryland v. Antonelli Creditors’ Liquidating Trust, 123 F.3d 777, 786-87 (4th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). The Mitchells’ contention that Count 1 did

A: holding that a notice of appeal filed in an adversary proceeding could not appeal the main proceeding
B: holding that while an original bankruptcy proceeding where the state is not named as a defendant is not a suit an adversary proceeding directly against the state would be
C: holding that a workers compensation proceeding is a legal proceeding
D: holding that where an action is brought by the debtors at the initial proceeding the appeal of that action is not a continuing proceeding against the debtors
B.