With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Nov. 23, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (upholding the denial of a bill of review because the applicant “could have filed a rule 306(a)(5) motion to extend the deadlines to seek relief’ but did not; and thus the applicant “has failed to produce evidence that her failure to file postjudgment motions or an appeal was unmixed with any fault or negligence of her own”); Moseley v. Omega OB-GYN Assocs. of S. Arlington, No. 02-06-00291-CV, 2008 WL 2510638, at *2 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth June 19, 2008, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (rendering judgment denying a bill of review where the petitioner failed to utilize Rule 306a and instead filed a bill of review); Smalling v. Smalling, Nos. 01-97-00246-CV & 01-98-00691-CV, 1998 WL 394349, at *2 (TexApp.-Houston [1st Dist.] July .16, 1998, .no pet.) (mem. op.) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the trial court erred in

A: holding thata bill of review was unavailable where the petitioner had actual notice of a default judgment between twentyone and ninety days of the judgment but failed to utilize rule 306a
B: holding that a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment precluded default judgment
C: holding that a bill of review was improperly granted where the petitioner received notice of a default judgment on the thirtyfourth  day following judgment and failed to file a motion for new trial under the extensions contemplated by rule 306a
D: holding that notice of judgment was insufficient
A.