With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of rules of evidence at sentencing proceedings before the court); United States v. Bradley, 880 F.Supp. 271, 290-91 (M.D.Pa. 1994) (.[The Constitution] has never been held to req n. 4, 105 S.Ct. 460, 83 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984) (stating that courts possess inherent authority to manage the course of trials through evidentiary rulings); Lopez v. United States, 373 U.S. 427, 440, 83 S.Ct. 1381, 10 L.Ed.2d 462 (1963) (noting courts’ authority to exclude material evidence in the absence of constitutional or statutory rules); Duquesne Light Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 66 F.3d 604, 609-10 (3d Cir.1995) (stating that courts possess inherent power to issue orders that are in harmony, although not required, by federal rules); United States v. O’Driscoll, 250 F.Supp.2d 432, 435-36 (M.D.Pa.2002) (<HOLDING>). 15 . Neither party argues that the sentencing

A: recognizing that the federal rules of evidence do not apply to sentencing hearings
B: holding that although federal rules of evidence do not govern sentencing proceedings before a jury in a death penalty case court should exclude as unreliable hearsay evidence of unadjudicated misconduct
C: holding that disputes as to evidence admitted at a restitution hearing are meritless because the rules of evidence do not apply during sentencing proceedings
D: holding that although federal rules of evidence do not govern sentencing proceedings before a jury in a death penalty case court possesses inherent authority to exclude relevant evidence as unreliable or prejudicial
B.