With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". v. Exxon Corp., 860 F.Supp. 332 (M.D.La.1994). 29 . Mitchell, 860 F.Supp. at 335. 30 . Corriere v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 893 F.2d 98 (citing B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co., 663 F.2d 545, 549 n. 9 (5th Cir.1981)). 31 . Bourque v. Nan Ya Plastics Corp., 906 F.Supp. 348 (M.D.La.1995). 32 . 893 F.2d 98, 101 (5th Cir.1990). See also Mitchell, 860 F.Supp. at 336. 33 . Bourque, 906 F.Supp. at 352 (citing Tapia v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., 590 So.2d 806 (La.App. 4th Cir.1991)); Bankston v. BASF Corp., 827 F.Supp. 1239, 1240 (citing Waldrop v. Vistron Corp., 391 So.2d 1274 (La.App. 1st Cir.1980)); Courtney v. BASF Wyandotte Corp., 385 So.2d 391 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 386 So.2d 359 (1980). In Bourque, Judge Parker found "[k]nowledge by an employer that it utiliz a.1994) (<HOLDING>); Mitchell v. Exxon Corp., 907 F.Supp. 198

A: holding that a worker who was injured when his hand was caught in a plastic press and burned by molten polyvinyl chloride could not establish a cause of action against a nondiverse defendant under the intentional act exception to workers compensation exclusivity and therefore the nondiverse defendants coworkers were fraudulently joined
B: holding employee who suffered damages as a result of fire and explosion that occurred on the job could not establish a cause of action against nondiverse coemployee defendants under the intentional act exceptions to the workers compensation exclusivity provision and therefore defendant coemployees were fraudulently joined
C: holding that the coemployee immunity provision in workers compensation law was constitutional
D: holding that were the court to find fraudulent joinder as to a nondiverse defendant on the basis of evidence equally dispositive of the liability of that defendant and a nondiverse defendant a refusal later in the proceedings to give judgment for the diverse defendant on the same grounds in turn would require the court to revisit a ruling that the nondiverse defendant was fraudulently joined
B.