With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Natural Resource Commission. The Commission (but not the EPA or any private party) directed Aviall to clean up the site. After voluntarily cleaning up the properties, Av-iall sought cost recovery under § 107 and contribution under § 113 from Cooper. The Court held that contribution under §113 was unavailable for Aviall because the claim was not brought “during or following any civil action” as contemplated under § 7 does not contain an “implied” cause of action for contribution brought by PRPs); compare Carrier Corp., 460 F.Supp.2d at 840 (concluding that an EPA Unilateral Administrative Order is a “civil action” within the meaning of § 106, thereby authorizing a suit for contribution under § 113), with Raytheon Aircraft Co. v. United States, 435 F.Supp.2d 1136, 1142-43 (D.Kan.2006) (<HOLDING>), and Pharmacia Corp. v. Clayton Chem.

A: holding that a  106 administrative order does not qualify as a civil action and therefore does not authorize suit under  113f1
B: holding that an attorneys negligence alone does not qualify for such relief
C: holding that a period of paid leave does not qualify as a suspension
D: holding under the circumstances that a criminal proceeding does not qualify as an alternate remedy under the federal fca
A.