With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 340 (1992). In Denton, the Court reviewed a dismissal of an inmate’s suit brought under title 28, section 1915 of the United States Code, the federal in forma pauperis statute. 504 U.S. at 27, 112 S.Ct. 1728. The Court held that a dismissal under this statute is not a dismissal on the merits; rather, it is merely an exercise of the trial court’s discretion under the statute. See id. at 34, 112 S.Ct. 1728. Thus, when reviewing whether the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the inmate’s suit, the appellate court should consider whether the suit was dismissed with prejudice and if it was, determine whether the inmate’s error could be remedied. See id. If the error could be remedied, then a dismissal with prejudice is improper. Compare Denton, 504 U.S. at 27, 112 S.Ct. 1728 (<HOLDING>), with Hicks v. Brysch, 989 F.Supp. 797, 816

A: holding that absent extraordinary circumstances a failure to comply with the statute requires a dismissal with prejudice
B: holding that the parties stipulation of dismissal with prejudice was a final judgment
C: holding dismissal with prejudice improper when inmates error can be remedied
D: holding that dismissal of a pro se complaint for failure to state a claim should generally be without prejudice but if the plaintiff has been given an opportunity amend his complaint and fails to do so the dismissal may be with prejudice
C.