With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the exclusion from evidence of the audio recordings in question -will hamstring, if not destroy, the State’s case. If the audio recordings are not admitted into evidence, the State will have to rely for its proof on the transcribed deposition of a codefendant who was murdered eight days after giving his deposition to Mr. Morgan’s attorney. The trial court has ruled that this deposition is admissible in evidence and that it may be read into the record at Mr. Morgan’s second trial. However, absent the audio recordings, the deposition testimony of the eodefendant will be substantially uncorroborated. Under these circumstances, we conclude that this is a case where certiora-ri review is “an apt remedy.” Pettis, 520 So.2d at 253; see also State v. Rolack, 104 So.3d 1286 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (<HOLDING>). IV. DISCUSSION Partially inaudible or

A: holding a prosecutors comments indicating his personal belief in the states witnesses was a fair reply to defense counsels attack on the veracity of the states witnesses
B: holding that review by certiorari was available to remedy a trial court order that improperly struck two of the states witnesses as a sanction for the states failure to disclose the address of one of the witnesses in discovery
C: holding that in light of defendants attack on credibility of states witnesses prosecutor did not commit misconduct during closing argument when he implied states witnesses were credible
D: holding that the drastic sanction of preclusion of expert witnesses was not warranted based on failure to furnish discovery by the discovery deadline when the deadline could have been shifted
B.