With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of directors, the number of directors shall be the same as that provided for in the articles of incorporation. Tex. Bus. Corp. Act Ann. art. 2.32 (Vernon 1980). The articles of incorporation list Hoggett and Carlin as the initial directors. It is undisputed the number of directors was never increased to make Brown a director either by amendment to the articles or “in the manner provided in the bylaws.” The fact Brown was never made a director pursuant to the articles of incorporation and by-laws constitutes “some evidence” Brown was not a director. See Aim, 717 S.W.2d at 593. Therefore, the court should not have granted the motion to disregard this finding and point of error one is sustained. However, by cross-point, appellees argue the great wei 65 (Tex.Civ.App.— Dallas 1976, no writ) (<HOLDING>); Caldwell v. Kingsbery, 451 S.W.2d 247, 250-51

A: holding that voting agreement that did not comply with certain notice requirements of the act was enforceable because all of the shareholders knew of the agreement and participated in the transaction in question
B: holding that noncompliance with terms of agreement did not terminate agreement failure to comply with date requirement in termination procedure rendered termination ineffective and letter between nonparty and party could not terminate agreement
C: holding that a settlement agreement in which the plaintiff agreed to drop all claims against the defendants in exchange for a specific sum of money was enforceable despite the fact that the agreement did not specify whether the plaintiffs promise would take the legal form of a release or a covenant not to sue
D: holding that an agreement was not enforceable as a section 27 compromise because the notice requirements of rule 919a  were not met
A.