With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". On April 27, 2009, Onusko filed the instant lawsuit. The Complaint contains three counts: Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Count One), Negligent Misrepresentation (Count Two), and Deceit (Count Three). After an extended period of discovery, Chase filed the Motion for Summary Judgment now before the Court. II. LEGAL STANDARD The Court may grant summary judgment when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Felty v. Graves-Humphreys Co., 818 F.2d 1126, 1128 (4th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). Nevertheless, in determining whether there is

A: recognizing that cases have generally treated statutory exceptions from remedial statutes as affirmative defenses
B: recognizing that the statute of limitations provision of the aedpa is an affirmative defenses rather than jurisdictional
C: holding that affirmative defenses are waived if not pled
D: recognizing that trial judges have an affirmative obligation to prevent factually unsupported claims and defenses from proceeding to trial
D.