With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Additionally, no political party may accept contributions from an individual that exceed $3,000, aggregated for all levels of state government. § 3(3)(a). Corporations and labor organizations are prohibited from contributing to candidate committees and political parties. Colo. Const. art. XXVIII, § 3(4)(a). 18 . See supra note 17. 19 . Other jurisdictions have held that absolute bans are not per se unconstitutional. See Inst. of Gov't Advocates v. Fair Political Practices Comm'n, 164 F.Supp.2d 1183, 1191 (E.D.Cal. 2001); N.C. Right to Life, Inc. v. Bartlett, 168 F.3d 705, 716 (4th Cir.1999); Casino Ass'n of La. v. Louisiana ex rel. Foster, 820 So.2d 494, 504 (2002). But see Fair Political Practices Comm'n v.Super. Ct., 25 Cal.3d 33, 45, 157 Cal.Rptr. 855, 599 P.2d 46 (Cal.1979) (<HOLDING>). But the Supreme Court has held that in

A: holding that preemption was not required because michigans single business tax had only an incidental effect on erisa plans despite fact that tax was calculated based on plan contributions
B: holding that complete performance of contract constituted acceptance
C: holding that there was no federal question removal jurisdiction under the complete preemption exception to the wellpleaded complaint rule
D: holding that a complete ban on all contributions by lobbyists was not closely drawn under buckley
D.