With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of response are recoverable under § 113(f), § 107(a), or both.” Id. The Bronson Defendants’ motion holding that a PRP could never assert a § 107 claim, Atlantic Research did not overrule decisions holding that claims for costs incurred in performing a cleanup pursuant to a judicial or administrative settlement are limited to a contribution action under § 113(f). All of the post-Atlantic Research decisions that have directly addressed the issue are consistent in holding that Atlantic Research did not overrule decisions holding that claims for costs incurred in performing a cleanup pursuant to a judicial or administrative settlement are limited to a contribution action under § 113(f). See Appleton Papers Inc. v. George A. Whiting Paper Co., 572 F.Supp.2d 1034, 1041-44 (E.D.Wis.2008) (<HOLDING>); Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Consol. Rail

A: holding that the plaintiffs suit for workrelated costs incurred pursuant to a consent decree was a contribution action under  113f
B: holding that bankruptcy court could not enter judgment for 7402564 under  107a for incurred costs when such costs had not been incurred
C: holding that cleanup costs incurred pursuant to a consent decree were not incurred voluntarily and must be sought through a  113f contribution action
D: holding that an action by plaintiffs who had a legal obligation to conduct cleanup pursuant to a  106 order and then sought costs for cleanup from other prps was the quintessential action for contribution
C.