With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". mental illness. After a series of appeals and remands, the district court reviewed the claim on the merits and denied it. Abdur’ Rahman v. Bell, No. 3:96-0380, 2009 WL 211133, at *16 (M.D.Tenn. Jan. 26, 2009). Fifth, Abdur’Rahman alleged that the prosecutor lied to defense counsel about the 1972 conviction. According to Ab-dur’Rahman, the prosecutor told defense counsel that an FBI agent could testify that Abdur’Rahman killed the other prisoner as part of a drug turf war and defense counsel was too intimidated to put on evidence about the crime. The district court addressed the merits and found that there was no prosecutorial misconduct. Id. at *17. Sixth, Abdur’Rahman clai .2d 46, 2015 WL 5774557 (2015); Lambrix v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 756 F.3d 1246, 1260-61 (11th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 64, 190

A: holding that martinez did not apply to ineffective assistance of counsel subclaims that were not defaulted by postconviction counsel
B: recognizing claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel usually must be raised in collateral proceeding
C: holding that the postconviction court erred in finding the ineffective assistance of counsel claim proeedurally barred because the courts opinion did not comment specifically on the ineffective counsel argument and the overall holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the jurys verdict could not be viewed as an adjudication on the merits of the ineffective assistance claim
D: holding that martinez did not apply to case where ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims were reviewed on the merits in a  2254 proceeding
D.