With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a federal employee needs to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing a claim of retaliation. While the D.C. Circuit “has declined to weigh in on the issue,” Lewis v. Dist. of Columbia, 535 F.Supp.2d 1, 7 (D.D.C.2008) (citing Weber v. Battista, 494 F.3d 179, 183-84 (D.C.Cir.2007)), one view is that “Morgan has, on the whole, been understood to ... bar [unexhausted claims of retaliation based on] discrete acts occurring after the time period, after the filing of an administrative complaint, when a plaintiff does not file a new complaint or amend the old complaint but instead presents these acts for the first time in federal court.” Romero-Ostolaza v. Ridge, 370 F.Supp.2d 139, 149 (D.D.C. 2005) ; see also Adams v. Mineta, Civil Action No. 04-856(RBW), 2006 WL 3678 8 (D.D.C.2008) (<HOLDING>); Turner v. Dist. of Columbia, 383 F.Supp.2d

A: holding that plaintiff could not look to the courts for relief because he did not exhaust his administrative remedies under the adea
B: holding that a plaintiff need not exhaust his administrative remedies to bring a retaliation claim
C: holding that federal prisoners need not exhaust their administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court
D: holding plaintiff did not exhaust his retaliation claim where his eeoc charge made no mention of retaliation
B.