With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of Education, 706 F.2d 757, 762 (6th Cir.1983). See also International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324, 375, 97 S.Ct. 1843, 1874, 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977) (court should take practicalities into account in devising remedies under Title VII and in any equitable decree.) This court, moreover, in reversing the trial court in the Oliver case, stated: In most school desegregation cases, as in this one, see 498 F.Supp. at 746, 751, the constitutional rights to be vindicated are those of the students, not of the teachers or potential teachers. The students, however, do not have a constitutional right to attend a school with a teaching staff of any particular racial composition. See Fort Bend Independent School District v. City of Stafford, 651 F.2d 1133 (5th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>). Rather, with respect to the teaching staff,

A: holding that both the lodestar and the percentage of the fund methods are permitted
B: holding that the percentage of minority faculty need not approximate the percentage of minority students
C: holding that a white defendant can object to the exclusion of minority jurors through the use of peremptory challenges
D: holding that a prima facie case of discrimination is not established merely by the number of peremptory strikes against blacks in cases where the percentage of blacks on the empaneled jury is higher than the percentage of the venire pool
B.