With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the Assembly codified in statutes and rules, none of which explicitly authorize respondent’s action. However, relying on the inherent powers of a legislative body’s presiding officer and Errichetti v. Merlino, 188 N.J.Super. 309, 457 A.2d 476 (Law Div.1982), legislative counsel expressed his opinion that the Speaker has the authority to suspend, not terminate, the compensation of a member for good cause (in this case intimating a sense of the General Assembly that it is in the public interest), subject to affording the member a fair hearing and, of course, ultimately upon such further review as the General Assembly deems appropriate. This appeal follows, in which appellant challenges the Speaker’s action as violative of his consti 634, 635, 636-37, 577 A.2d 1298 (App.Div.1990) (<HOLDING>). In Brady v. N.J. Redistricting Commission,

A: holding that the attorney generals decision not to provide representation to an employee is reviewable by the appellate division not by the law division where the actions against the employee are pending
B: holding that appeal from a decision of the attorney general denying legal representation was before the appellate division as of right to review the final decision of a state officer
C: holding that an appeal from an order of the adjutant general reducing the rank of an army national guard member is within the jurisdiction of the state department of military and veterans affairs and is therefore cognizable by the appellate division
D: holding that decisions of the new jersey meadowlands commission established in but not of the department of community affairs njsa 13175a are appealable to the appellate division as of right
C.