With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Additionally, the law o tating law of case doctrine is not absolute mandate); State v. Jefferson, 31 S.W.3d 558, 561 (Tenn.2000) (noting law of case doctrine is “discretionary rule of judicial practice”); State v. Presler, 731 A.2d 699, 703 (R.I.1999) (noting law of case “does not have the finality of res judicata”); Zawodniak v. State, 339 Ark. 66, 3 S.W.3d 292, 294 (1999) (stating law of case doctrine is not inflexible and does not absolutely preclude error); Sherley v. Commonwealth, 889 S.W.2d 794, 797 (Ky.1994) (indicating courts “are not absolutely bound by law of case doctrine and may exercise discretion in its application”); People v. Stanley, 10 Cal.4th 764, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 543, 897 P.2d 481, 492-93 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1208, 116 S.Ct. 1825, 134 L.Ed.2d 930 (1996) (<HOLDING>); People v. Herrera, 204 Mich.App. 333, 514

A: holding that court may not impose procedural requirements on agency decisionmaking that go beyond those of the administrative procedure act
B: holding law of case doctrine is procedural and does not go to jurisdiction of court
C: holding that under alabama law the law of the forum applies to procedural matters and that in most instances the statute of limitations is considered to be a procedural rule
D: holding that jurisdiction must be resolved before applying the act of state doctrine because that doctrine is a substantive rule of law
B.