With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the district court: there is uncertainty as to whether the Rehabilitation Act covers private organizations like the Girl Scouts. The relevant statutory language has been the subject of relatively few decisions, so this is not a case where a plaintiff obtusely failed to comply with well-established legal standards. Accordingly, Megan could reasonably have expected that the allegations in her original complaint would survive a motion to dismiss. Moreover, given how difficult it might be to discover all of the Girl Scouts’ activities, the disputed issue is one that may require considerable time, effort, and money to litigate. It was reasonable for her to avoid that expense until she was sure that she failed to survive the motion to dismiss. Cf. Bausch v. Stryker Corp., 630 F.3d at 560-61 (<HOLDING>) (citation and internal quotation marks

A: recognizing that plaintiffs pleading burden is commensurate with the amount of information available to them
B: holding that the burden is on the plaintiff
C: recognizing relevance of information and that need for this information outweighs the burden to appellants
D: recognizing burden
A.