With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". determine how much usable methamphetamine it could produce. At oral argument, the parties agreed that the quantity of liquid possessed by Gentry would likely produce 1 gram of powder methamphetamine — a user quantity. The evidence shows that Gentry possessed a handgun. The government also introduced evidence of a bag containing approximately 24.30 grams of powder methamphetamine. Circumstantial evidence such as the presence of a firearm or a large quantity of drugs may be used to prove intent to distribute. See United States v. Brett, 872 F.2d 1365, 1370 (8th Cir.1989). Additionally, the fact that the methamphetamine in the bag was further subdivided into seven Ziploc baggies, supports a finding of intent to distribute. See United States v. Kuenstler, 325 F.3d 1015, 1024 (8th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). We sit as a reviewing court, not as a trier

A: holding that evidence that the accused possessed 37 grams of crack was sufficient to prove he had the intent to distribute it
B: holding no unfair prejudice from admission of conviction for possession of 50 to 200 pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute as evidence of intent to distribute cocaine
C: holding prior conviction for possession of methamphetamine relevant to show knowledge and intent for conspiracy to distribute where the defendant claimed he was unaware that another person in the vehicle was distributing methamphetamine
D: holding evidence sufficient to support conviction of intent to distribute based on inter alia 047 grams of methamphetamine divided into five individual packages
D.