With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". was impossible and therefore that no infringement might be termed “willful.” The Court disagrees. Elimination by manual monitoring would have been difficult and expensive, but not impossible, particularly for images as obviously infringing as the ones at issue here. The evidence shows that Webb-world implemented substantial effort to combat the infringement. Notwithstanding its “compliance program,” Webbworld chose to continue to copy from a newsgroup that essentially advertised by its “centerfolds” name that it carried PEI images. After it was on notice of infringement, Webbworld chose to stay in business without implementing a system that would reliably delete even such obvious transgressions. Such an action constitutes willful infringement. See Broadcast Music, Inc., 855 F.2d at 236 (<HOLDING>). For the five copyright registrations

A: holding that intentional failure to file an information return is not a willful filing
B: holding that a music vendors choice to stay in business and thereby to continue to infringe copyrighted music was patently willful
C: holding that 1 the njcfa applies to corporations and other business entities when they are acting as consumers because business entities are considered a person under the act and no reason exists to treat it differently and 2 to be a consumer in respect to a transaction the business entity must be one who uses the goods and thereby diminishes their economic utility
D: holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding violation was willful and substantial
B.