With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". lower than a statutory minimum. IV. Melendez next argues that the government’s confidential informants offered to sell him cocaine at prices substantially below market price, thereby leading him to purchase a significantly greater quantity of cocaine than he ordinarily would have been able to purchase given his available funds. He maintains further that the $12,500 he had available for the drug deal would have enabled him to purchase, on the open market, only between one-half and three-quarters of a kilogram of cocaine instead of the more than 50 kilograms attributed to him by the district court. These facts, he contends, mandate a downward departure under application note 17 to USSG § 2D1.1. Melendez is not in a position to make these arguments, however. In his plea a h Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1023, 122

A: holding that defendants may agree to departure from sentencing guidelines in plea bargain
B: recognizing that postoffense rehabilitative efforts while normally not grounds for departure may support departure in extraordinary circumstances and noting that the totality of the circumstances may justify a departure where a single circumstance is not alone sufficient
C: holding that a motion under  5k11 permitted a downward departure from the guideline range but that the departure could not extend below the statutory minimum sentence absent an additional motion by the government under  3553e
D: holding that defendants diminished capacity while grounds for departure from the guidelines sentencing range is not grounds for departure below the minimum sentence set by congress
D.