With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992)). Because Garcia-Sical failed to present evidence demonstrating that he had political motives for joining the police force, or that drug traffickers attributed a political opinion to him, substantial evidence supports the Id’s finding that Garcia-Sical faded to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of political opinion. See Cruz-Navarro, 232 F.3d at 1030. Substantial evidence also supports the conclusion that Garcia-Sical’s status as a current or former Guatemalan police officer is insufficient to establish membership in a particular social group for the purposes of granting asylum. See id. at 1029; see also Arriaga-Barrientos v. INS, 937 F.2d 411, 414 (9th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). Because Garcia-Sical failed to satisfy the

A: holding that attempted conscription by a guatemalan guerrilla group did not constitute persecution on account of a political opinion where petitioner failed to show that the group was motivated by his political opinion
B: holding that the asylum standard for past persecution or wellfounded fear of future persecution is lower than the clear probability standard to show eligibility for withholding of removal
C: holding that government informants are not members of a particular social group
D: holding guatemalan military is not a social group qualifying its current and former members for asylum eligibility because they are not subject to statusbased persecution
D.