With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". J. Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and its order denying his motion for rehearing. The trial court correctly denied relief on Appellant’s argument that his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum. See Monroe v. State, 36 So.3d 930 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s

A: holding that sentences of five years in prison followed by ten years probation were illegal sentences that exceeded the statutory maximum of five years for a thirddegree felony
B: holding sentence of thirtyfive years in prison with ten years probation for seconddegree murder is within the statutory maximum under 1997 statutes
C: holding sentence of 100 years for forcible rape was in excess of statutory maximum
D: holding that a sentence structured with three years incarceration suspended and eight years of sex offender probation was a true split sentence
B.