With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". there- was no “evidence to support the contention that due to his disability, plaintiff has been unable to participate in programs or otherwise enjoy benefits offered to others incarcerated .... ” In that case, the prisoner, whose leg was amputated, alleged that he had been provided inadequate wheelchairs by the prison. See id. at 1165-66. That court reasoned that the prisoner’s claim was no more than a complaint that his medical care was inadequate because he was provided poor quality wheelchairs. See id. at 1168. The court preserved a distinction between claims that the medical treatment received for a disability was inadequate from claims that a prisoner has beeh denied access to services or programs because he is disabled. See also Bryant v. Madigan, 84 F.3d 246, (7th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Moore can be distinguished from the case at

A: recognizing that even when a prisoner files suit under section 1983 alleging medical malpractice against prison medical officials medical malpractice does not become a constitutional violation merely because the victim is a prisoner
B: holding that plaintiffs could not sue attorneys for legal malpractice so long as underlying medical malpractice action out of which legal malpractice claim arose was still pending on appeal
C: holding that the ada does not create a remedy for medical malpractice
D: holding the provisions of a comprehensive medical malpractice act unconstitutional
C.