With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Act does not define "claim,” that term is defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation as "a written demand or written assertion by one of the contracting parties seeking, as a matter of right, the payment of money in a sum certain, the adjustment or interpretation of contract terms, or other relief arising under or relating to the contract.” 48 C.F.R. § 2.101. For claims exceeding $100,000, the contractor must certify that: the claim is made in good faith; the supporting data is accurate and complete; and the amount requested accurately reflects the amount for which the contractor believes the Government is liable. See 41 U.S.C. § 605(c)(1). Government claims, however, do not require certification. See Placeway Constr. Corp. v. United States, 920 F.2d 903, 906-07 (Fed.Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). 11 . FAR § 52.232-20(h) provides, in relevant

A: holding that plaintiffs consequential damages were too speculative because no evidence connected damages to defendants breach of contract
B: holding that consequential damages are not to be considered
C: holding that an incidental beneficiary does not have standing to sue for breach of a contract
D: holding that government claim seeking incidental and consequential damages for plaintiffs alleged breach of contract did not require certification
D.