With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". for actions that did not fit within th[e] precise meanings [of the terms “wrongful entry or eviction”], yet would clearly seem within the same class of conduct intended to be insured against. Then a court confronted with such resistance would be forced to choose between denying coverage or bending the “wrongful entry or eviction” language out of shape to provide the insured with coverage. Martin, 699 F.Supp. at 170 (emphasis added). 2. East Central has not established a claim for “personal injury” under the CGL Policy. To avoid summary judgment, East Central must have alleged facts that support a claim that Creek County Well Service committed the offense of invading East Central’s private right of occupancy. See Liberty Bank v. Travelers Indem. Co., 870 F.2d 1504, 1508 (9th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). To determine whether East Central has

A: holding that under new hampshire law this definition of personal injury is ambiguous
B: holding that personal injury exception should be construed narrowly so as not to include torts without physical injury
C: holding that to apply the personal injury endorsement montana law requires the complaint to allege facts establishing the elements of one of the enumerated torts listed under the insurance policys definition of personal injury
D: holding that in a personal injury suit the timely notice requirement does not apply
C.