With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the statutory purpose any more than demanding rigid compliance with those requirements does. See A.S.I., Inc. v. Sanders, No. 92-1209 PFK, 1996 WL 91626, * 4 (D.Kan. Feb.9, 1996) (finding that a plaintiff's remedial activities thwarted one of the NCP’s fundamental purposes, i.e., including the public in proposed hazardous waste cleanups). Ultimately, therefore, to give effect to the statute and regulations as enacted, enforcement of the NCP requirements can be neither too rigid nor too loose. 251 . CERCLA did not originally recognize a claim for contribution among responsible parties, but was amended "in 1986 to clarify and confirm that CERCLA did incorporate such a claim.” Pinal Creek Group, supra, 118 F.3d at 1300 (citing Key Tronic Corp., supra, 511 U.S. at 814-18, 114 S.Ct. 1960 (<HOLDING>)). Under the section added— § 9613(f) — PRP

A: recognizing that numerous cases previously interpreted  107 to impliedly authorize such a cause of action
B: recognizing the cause of action
C: recognizing cause of action
D: recognizing derivative standing that bankruptcy courts can authorize
A.