With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the superior court is AFFIRMED. 1 . AS 28.35.030(a). 2 . AS 28.15.291(a)(1). 3 . AS 11.41.200(a)(1). 4 . AS 11.41.220(a)(1)(B). 5 . AS 28.35.050(a); AS 28.35.060(a). 6 . U.S. Const. amend. IV; Alaska Const. art. I, § 14. 7 . 90 P.3d 156 (Alaska 2004) (construing AS 28.35.031(g) to include the three requirements outlined in Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 710-72, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 1835-36, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966): (1) pro The bodily. process that eliminates alcohol also provides exigent circumstances obviating the need to obtain a warrant prior to administering a blood test."); Gregg v. State, 374 So.2d 1301, 1303 (Miss.1979) (finding that an "emergency situation" existed because of potential for loss of "critical evidence"); State v. Lerette, 858 S.W.2d 816, 819 (Mo.App.1993) (<HOLDING>); State v. Ravotto, 169 N.J. 227, 777 A.2d 301,

A: holding that once the scene was secure exigent circumstances no longer existed and the police were required to obtain a search warrant
B: holding that exigent circumstances were created by dissipation of bloodalcohol content in time needed to obtain a warrant
C: holding that exigent circumstances were present because evidence of bloodalcohol content could disappear during the time necessary to obtain a warrant
D: holding existence of arrest warrant compelling case for finding dissipation
B.