With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Such an order implicates no constitutional concern because it ‘does not signify a district court’s assessment of the legal merits of the complaint.’ It therefore does not raise the issue of a district court adjudicating the merits of a ‘case or controversy’ over which it lacks jurisdiction.” Id. at 138, 112 S.Ct. 1076 (citation omitted) (quoting Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 110 S.Ct. 2447, 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990)). B. Application of Law to Facts: Fees “[I]t is clear than an award of attorney’s fees is a collateral matter over which a court normally retains jurisdiction even after being divested of jurisdiction on the merits.” Moore v. Permanente Med. Group., Inc., 981 F.2d 443, 445 (9th Cir. 1992); see also Mints v. Educ. Testing Serv., 99 F.3d 1253, 1258 (3d Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). This court’s rulings on fee matters in the

A: holding that the state court is revested with jurisdiction when a federal district court executes the remand order and mails a certified copy of the order to the state court
B: holding that mere entry of a remand order divests a federal court of jurisdiction even where no certified copy of the order was mailed to a state court
C: holding the divesting of jurisdiction by the mailing of a certified copy of the order of remand does not preclude the award of attorneys fees and costs
D: holding that the mailing of a certified copy of a remand order to a state court divests federal jurisdiction
C.