With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". case. We conclude, based upon Rambert and Nobles, that the evidence here supported three separate charges against defendant McDaniel. Consequently, the trial court did not err in entering three judgments against defendant McDaniel for discharging a weapon into occupied property. Defendant McDaniel also argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to move, based on double jeopardy grounds, to arrest judgment on two counts of discharging a weapon into occupied property. Since we have concluded that defendant McDaniel could properly be convicted of and sentenced for all three counts, he cannot show that his attorney failed to provide effective assistance of counsel. See State v. Brewton, 173 N.C. App. 323, 333, 618 S.E.2d 850, 858 (2005) (<HOLDING>). We, therefore, conclude defendants received a

A: holding where defendant challenged jury instruction and also claimed ineffective assistance of counsel based upon his counsels failure to object to instruction because we find no error in the instructions defendants claim for ineffective assistance of counsel must also be rejected
B: recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
C: holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record
D: holding that failure to object to admissible evidence was not ineffective assistance of counsel
A.