With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". activities so that determining its major purpose requires a very close examination of various activities and statements. Or an organization may be engaging in substantial amounts of both federal and non-federal electoral activity, again requiring a detailed analysis of its various activities. 511 F.Supp.2d at 31. The necessity of a contextual inquiry is supported by judicial decisions applying the major purpose test, which have used the same fact-intensive analysis that the Commission has adopted. See, e.g., Fed. Election Comm’n v. Malenick, 310 F.Supp.2d 230, 234-37 (D.D.C.2004), rev’d in part, No. Civ. A. 02-1237(JR), 2005 WL 588222 (D.D.C. Mar. 7, 2005); Fed. Election Comm’n v. GOPAC, Inc., 917 F.Supp. 851, 859, 864-66 (D.D.C.1996); see also Shays II, 511 F.Supp.2d at 29-31 (<HOLDING>). Real Truth’s argument that the major purpose

A: holding that the mere allegation of arbitrary and capricious action on defendants part absent a direct and pointed attack on the evidentiary basis of the agencys action is insufficient to warrant a judicial determination of wrongful agency action
B: holding that evaluations submitted after the committees final decision cannot be considered in determining whether the decision was arbitrary and capricious
C: holding that fathers military service alone was neither political opinion nor sufficient to establish imputed political opinion
D: holding that the commissions choice to regulate  527 groups by determining whether they qualified as political action committees on a casebycase basis was neither arbitrary nor capricious
D.