With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ]shall be located by the [B]oard in cities of the first class,” and both Section 1304(b)(1) and 1307 refer to “Category 2 licenses” or “Category 2 licensed facilities” that have been “located by the [B]oard.” 4 Pa.C.S. §§ 1304(b)(1),1307. We further observe that in these provisions, the General Assembly has not afforded the electorate of a first class city the right to consider, affect or override the Board’s location decision once it is made. The Board does not, however, exercise its sole authority under the Gaming Act to fix the site of licensed facilities within Philadelphia in a vacuum. This is because the General Assembly has given Philadelphia the power to zone.. See Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Ass’n, 505 Pa. 614, 483 A.2d 448, 451 (1984) (<HOLDING>) Thus, while the Board and only the Board is

A: holding that where a zoning board had no authority under state law to take certain actions with respect to a protected property interest a trier of fact could conclude that there was no rational basis for the towns zoning boards actions and that as a result the zoning board violated appellants rights to substantive due process
B: holding that the legislature did not intend the state to be bound by local zoning regulations when constructing a communications tower because the legislature neither named the state nor manifested an intention that it be bound by the provisions of the enabling act which granted zoning authority to the city
C: holding that the llupa does not provide for judicial review of requests to change zoning or comprehensive zoning plans
D: recognizing that philadelphia as a home rule city derives its power generally to govern itself and to enact zoning regulations from the home rule act 53 ps  13101 but that to the extent that provisions of the zoning enabling act 53 ps  14752 are not inconsistent with philadelphias zoning regulations they remain in force
D.