With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is no evidence to support plaintiffs position that defendant acted in bad faith in hiring the persons who evaluated plaintiffs alleged damages, in relying upon their report, and in claiming that a policy exclusion applied to the circumstances that created plaintiffs alleged damages. In those states that recognize Consumer Fraud Act applicability to insurance transactions, a mere coverage dispute is insufficient to show consumer fraud. See Barr Co. v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America, 583 F. Supp. 248, 257-58 (N.D. Ill. 1984) (Consumer Fraud Act count that alleged defendant had a practice of not paying valid claims promptly and completely could go forward because it was not “merely a contract action at heart”); Showpiece Homes Corp. v. Assurance Co. of America, 38 P.3d 47, 59 (Colo. 2002) (<HOLDING>); Gray v. N.C. Ins. Underwriting Ass’n, 529

A: holding insurer not liable for bad faith when it denied insureds claim based on a good faith dispute regarding the interpretation of a rule
B: holding that bad faith handling of an insureds claim fell within the act
C: holding  616d030 barred employees action where employee alleged the insurance carrier acted in bad faith in handling the claim
D: holding that a bad faith claim is a tort
B.