With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". dissent below, Judge Morgan discusses Babcock v. State, 116 Wn.2d 596, 809 P.2d 143 (1991). There, several young girls were placed in foster care with a man who sexually abused them. It was alleged the abuse would not have occurred had the State conducted a proper investigation. Id. at 604-06. In Yonker an ex-wife complained to DSHS that she suspected child abuse and DSHS took no action. Yonker v. Dep’t of Soc. & Health Servs., 85 Wn. App. 71, 72-73, 930 P.2d 958 (1997). In both cases the injury was not placement, but what happened as a consequence of negligent investigations. Also in Rodriguez the Court of Appeals was concerned with negligent investigation methods and intimidation of children alleged to have been abused. Rodriguez v. Perez, 99 Wn. App. 439, 441-42, 994 P.2d 874 (2000) (<HOLDING>). The court in Rodriguez recognized what we

A: holding that a psychiatrist owed a duty to a person foreseeably injured by his patient
B: holding that deference is owed to state agencys interpretation of state law
C: holding that broker owed no fiduciary duty to client as a matter of law
D: holding law enforcement owed duty similar to that owed by dshs under rcw 2644050
D.