With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". for judge-ordered community supervision and parole, a deadly weapon finding does not alter the range of punishment to which the defendant is subject, or the number of years to which he is sentenced. See Tex.Code Crim. PROC. Ann. art. 42.12, § 3g(a)(2); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 508.145, 508.149 (Vernon Supp.2010); Ex Parte Huskins, 176 S.W.3d 818, 820 (Tex.Crim.App.200 .-Fort Worth 1994, pet. ref'd) (explaining that deadly weapon finding statutes “refer generally to a trial of a felony, making no exception for those felonies where the use of a deadly weapon finding constitutes an essential element of the offense”); see also Jones v. State, No. 14-03-00650-CR, 2005 WL 549541, at *10—11 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] March 10, 2005, pet. ref'd) (not designated for pub.; mem. op.) (<HOLDING>). We agree with the reasoning of these courts.

A: holding same conduct can be used as element of offense and also serve as basis for a deadly weapon finding under article 4212 section 3ga2 and explaining that to hold otherwise would conflict with the unambiguous language of article 4212 section 3ga2
B: holding in case in which defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon that same conduct could be used as element of offense and also serve as basis for deadly weapon finding
C: holding that preparation of a psi report is discretionary under article 3707 rather than mandatory under article 4212
D: holding floor can be used as deadly weapon
A.