With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". hazardous substances, and vehicles that carry passengers for hire. Therefore, it appears that UM coverage for passenger-carrying vehicles attaches to the vehicles, just as liability insurance for all three types of vehicles attaches to the vehicles. If so, UM coverage for passenger-carrying vehicles would protect anyone in the vehicle, including the driver. To the extent that this interpretation conflicts with A.R.S. section 20-259.01 (Supp. 1998), which makes uninsured coverage for insureds optional, and in light of longstanding public policy to protect victims from financially irresponsible drivers, we liberally construe section 28-4033(A)(2) to include drivers within the protected class of victims. See, e.g., Lowing v. Allstate Ins. Co., 176 Ariz. 101, 104, 859 P.2d 724, 727 (1993) (<HOLDING>); Employers Mut. Cos. Co. v. McKeon, 159 Ariz.

A: recognizing that umuim statute is remedial in nature and should be liberally construed
B: holding that umuim coverage is to be construed liberally to give full effect to the public policy which led to its enactment
C: holding that coas should be construed liberally
D: holding that the social security act is remedial and needs to be construed liberally
A.