With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". B 11112-3. This language could be read to state that the USPS intended to move out of the old Brightmoor Station Post Office some date after signing Settlement Agreement I. When viewed in the context of the dealings of the parties, it is clear that Settlement Agreement I was to extinguish the leasehold estate on November 30, 2000 and surrender the old Brightmoor Station Post Office on that date, particularly because an express provision of the Agreement terminated the lease effective November 30, 2000. See PI. PFF Ex. B 114 (“The parties have mutually agreed to terminate the lease ... effective November 30, 2000.”); see also Beall, 94 U.S. at 389 (defining “surrender” as “the yielding up the estate to the landlord, so that the leasehold interest becom 80 N.Y.S. 247 (N.Y.App.Div.1903) (<HOLDING>). Finally, Plaintiff contends that the USPS did

A: holding that where the landlord was aware the tenant had moved out a tenant who attached a lock to the door and accidentally retained the keys to the lock was not a holdover tenant
B: holding the landlord did not trespass when his agent entered the premises for the purpose of showing them to a potential tenant
C: holding that the tenant was not a holdover tenant despite retaining keys because the tenant recognized the termination of the tenancy relinquished possession of the premises and the landlord was able to gain access to the property
D: holding that where the will did not provide the life tenant with the power to sell and it was not necessary to sell the property for the payment of estate expenses the life tenant was not entitled to the proceeds from the sale of the property instead the proceeds became a part of the residuary estate
A.