With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (14) days of the entry of judgment. 1 . Defendants also cite In re Lombardo Fruit & Produce Co., 12 F.3d 110 (8th Cir.1993); however, that case involves notice requirements under PACA and is not germane to the issues in the instant case. 2 . The total sum of $25,243.95 represents the principal debt of $24,553.70 plus prejudgment interest of $690.25 calculated from October 7, 2000 — thirty days after the last produce was sold to Cape on thirty-day payment terms. In its discretion, the court has determined to grant Plaintiff’s request for prejudgment interest and has determined the prevailing post-judgment interest rate of 2.24% per annum is an appropriate prejudgment interest rate in this case. See, e.g., Smith v. Am. Int'l Life Assurance Co. of New York, 50 F.3d 956 (11th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); see also Indus. Risk Insurers v. M.A.N.

A: holding that award and rate of prejudgment interest are within trial courts discretion
B: holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest at the colorado statutory rate of 8 percent
C: holding that it is proper to award prejudgment interest at the legal rate from the date the monies were due under the contract
D: holding that the proper rate for prejudgment interest is the rate fixed by the parties in a contract
A.