With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". disposal in the jury room. See supra note 128. Moreover, as mentioned, during deliberations the jury requested to review hundreds of pages of trial transcripts; numerous audio and videotaped evidence, which they did not have in the jury room; and physical evidence such as cash, narcotics and firearms. See supra note 132. The time expended by the jury, and the wealth of evidence they reviewed, evidenced the care with which they deliberated and their extraordinary efforts to reach agreement. In the end, despite their best efforts, the jury was able to reach unanimous verdicts, as to all defendants, charged in thirty-four of the forty-six counts, while failing to reach unanimous verdicts, as to particular defendants, charged in the remaining twelve counts. C.f. Crosley, 634 F.Supp. at 33 (<HOLDING>). The indication from the jury, after almost

A: holding that issues underlying all counts were sufficiently intertwined that the separate appeal of the summary judgment counts would complicate the trial of the remaining counts
B: holding that defendant could not complain on appeal that the severed trial of two counts was tried to the same jury on the same day when he moved to sever the counts and then agreed to incorporating evidence from the trial of one count into the trial of the other count
C: holding that states appeal of trial courts dismissal of first count in a four count indictment under cj  12302cl was not ripe until final judgment on the remaining counts pled in the guilty plea and noting that upon imposition of the sentences on the remaining counts the situation  was ripe for the state to appeal or to perfect its earlier attempt to appeal
D: holding that ten hours over two days was a sufficient period of time and explaining that most significant  was the fact that the deliberations were lengthy enough for the jury to return a verdict on 14 of 23 counts presented to it and to twice report an impasse on the remaining nine counts
D.