With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". proper on another basis: The alleged facts do not rise to the level of working conditions so intolerable that “a reasonable person confronted with the same circumstances would feel coerced” into leaving the workplace. The conduct that Mr. Trobovic identifies, while regrettable if it occurred, is not sufficiently severe or pervasive to satisfy the demanding legal standard of proving that the GSA intentionally created a hostile work environment that would have coerced an employee in Mr. Trobovic’s circumstances to absent himself from work. See Garcia, 437 F.3d at 1329 (“[T]he doctrine of coercive involuntariness is a narrow one[,] requiring that the employee satisfy a demanding legal standard.” (quotation marks omitted)); cf. Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 434 (4th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); Breeding v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., 164

A: holding that the plaintiffs evidence of pretext which included but was not limited to her supervisors statement that she had enough of the plaintiff going to her supervisor about her was not sufficient to preclude summary judgment
B: holding that working conditions were not intolerable to the point of coercion where supervisors yelled at employee told her she was a poor manager gave her poor performance evaluations chastised her in front of customers and once required her to work with an injured back
C: holding that relative to the threat that she posed physically separating tina cortez from her telephone taking her by the arm  escorting her from her home taking the keys to her home and locking the door and  placing her in the locked back seat of a patrol car was excessive force as well as an unlawful seizure under the fourth amendment
D: holding that threatening employee to mind her own business investigating her videotaping her without her permission and forcing her to take polygraph could not be considered adverse employment actions because they had no effect on conditions of employment
B.