With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant for a claim arising directly from the telephone call. Id. at 522. Although seemingly applicable at first blush, this case is inapposite. The Norton Court relied heavily on Edmundson v. Miley Trailer Co., where the Iowa Supreme Court recognized “a national tendency which generally has required less and less contact for the constitutional minimum.” See id. at 521-22; Edmundson v. Miley Trailer Co., 211 N.W.2d 269, 272 (Iowa 1973). In Edmundson, the Court held that it was “reasonable” for the non-resident manufacturer and retailer of a trailer and hitch to be subject to a lawsuit anywhere the trailer and hitch traveled. Edmundson, 211 N.W.2d at 272. Edmundson has been overruled. See Smalley v. Dewberry, 379 N.W.2d 922, 924-25 (Iowa 1986) (<HOLDING>). Thus, although Norton has not been directly

A: holding that while stare decisis is a guiding principle prior interpretations of workers compensation statute must be overruled because the interpretations were wrong
B: recognizing that cases holding that proof of venue is jurisdictional are inconsistent with ex parte seymour and have therefore been overruled
C: recognizing that a 11 evidence must be relevant to be admissible
D: recognizing that worldwide volkswagen is a rejection of edmundson so edmundson  must be and is overruled
D.