With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". effects of the tinnitus provides substantial evidence for the ALJ’s credibility determination regarding the tinnitus. See Dyer, 395 F.3d at 1210-12 (concluding substantial evidence supported the ALJ’s determination that a claimant’s subjective complaints were inconsistent with his testimony and the medical record). While Mr. Griffin faults the ALJ for failing to consider his tinnitus in the credi bility determination, the ALJ expressly recognized Mr. Griffin’s reports of ringing in his ears in his credibility analysis. The record therefore demonstrates that that ALJ did in fact consider Mr. Griffin’s tinnitus in his credibility determination. And while the ALJ’s reference to that ailment was short, he was not required to refer to every piece of evidence. See Dyer, 395 F.3d at 1211 (<HOLDING>). y. RES JUDICATA Finally, Mr. Griffin contends

A: holding the alj does not have to specifically refer to every piece of evidence so long as the decision is not a broad rejection that is insufficient to permit a court to conclude that the alj considered the claimants medical condition as a whole
B: holding the record must demonstrate that the alj considered all of the evidence and the alj must discuss  the evidence supporting his decision  the uncontroverted evidence he chooses not to rely upon and significantly probative evidence he rejects
C: holding that an alj is entitled to make a credibility determination regarding the claimants subjective complaints after specifically addressing these complaints and reviewing the medical evidence in the record
D: holding the alj is not required to address every piece of evidence but he must articulate some legitimate reason for his decision
A.