With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". at 5 (CR 172). 4 . Although the City contends that the manufacture and operation of amusement games are not occupations that warrant constitutional protection, it is well-recognized that the pursuit of an occupation or profession is a protected liberty interest that extends across a broad range of lawful occupations, see Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474, 492, 79 S.Ct. 1400, 1411, 3 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1959) (aeronautical engineer); Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 238-39, 77 S.Ct. 752, 755-56, 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) (law practice); Benigni v. City of Hemet, 879 F.2d 473, 478 (9th Cir.1988) (bar ownership), and we assume without deciding that the operation of skill-based amusement games is within this range, cf. Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, 762 F.2d 753, 756-57 (9th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, corporations, as legal persons,

A: holding that selling tshirts from a vending cart is an occupation protected under the constitution
B: recognizing exception under state constitution
C: holding that entitlement to benefits is a property interest protected by the due process clause of the fifth amendment to the united states constitution
D: holding that definition of seizure under state constitution differs from that under us constitution
A.