With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". rule allowing immediate appeal from an order compelling arbitration was not preempted by § 16 of the FAA because permitting immediate appeal did not undermine the purposes or objectives of the FAA. Simmons, 532 S.E.2d at 439. That court viewed the issue as one of a difference in the timing for an appeal from an order compelling arbitration and concluded that it made no difference to the objectives of 99); Xaphes v. Mowry, 478 A.2d 299, 301 (Me.1984) (dismissing appeal for lack of final judgment that 8 (Tex.1992) (“When Texas courts are called on to decide if disputed claims fall within the scope of an arbitration clause under the [FAA], Texas procedure controls that determination”); Belmont Constructors, Inc. v. Lyondell Petrochemical Co., 896 S.W.2d 352, 355 (Tex.Ct.App.1995) (<HOLDING>). The Defendants cite us to Eure v. Cantrell

A: holding order denying arbitration appealable under texas law and stating that although the faa also permits a party to appeal from an interlocutory order denying a request to compel arbitration federal procedure does not apply in texas courts even when texas courts apply the federal act footnote omitted
B: holding that faa does not require appellate review of order interlocutory under state law denying motion to compel arbitration and overruling prior decision finding such a requirement
C: holding an appeal may be taken from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration
D: recognizing the same rule in texas courts
A.