With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". The government failed to provide Singh the originals of the allegedly fraudulent English letter from Dr. Bedi and the letter in Punjabi Dr. Bedi gave to DHS investigators even though it knew Singh wanted to use the letters in his defense against the government’s allegations. See Dent v. Holder, 627 F.3d 365, 374 (9th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). At Singh’s final hearing, the IJ stated that

A: holding alien not denied judicial review because habeas was available
B: holding that there is no due process violation where the ijs finding was not arbitrary and the alien was not denied a full and fair opportunity to present his claims
C: holding that to establish a violation of due process an alien must show that she was denied a full and fair opportunity to present her claims internal quotation marks omitted
D: holding that failure to provide documents in governments possession denied alien an opportunity to fully and fairly litigate his removal
D.