With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". could reasonably believe it was not exempt from the Act. Accordingly, the search was permissible. AFFIRMED. 1 . Although some evidence suggests that the FBI was aware that the truck was lawfully registered in another state despite the lack of license plates, this does not affect the authority of DPS officers to stop the truck, particularly as there is no evidence that the DPS officers knew anything about the truck’s actual registration status. From the perspective of a Texas DPS officer following the truck, the operator of the vehicle was probably violating art. 6675a-3e § 5 and, accordingly, could be stopped. 2 . See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). 3 . Cf. United States v. Lefkowitz, 285 U.S. 452, 462-67, 52 S.Ct. 420, 422-24, 76 L.Ed. 877 (1932) (<HOLDING>). 4 . Although section 16(j) grants broad

A: holding that the purpose of a preliminary examination is to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a crime was committed and whether there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed it
B: holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same
C: holding that probable cause to believe certain individuals were members of a conspiracy did not give probable cause to search the contents of the room in which they were arrested
D: holding that where other evidence established probable cause to believe that the defendant possessed controlled substances investigating officers had probable cause to search the defendants purse for similar evidence
C.