With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". parcel that the Thars were leasing from the State of Wyoming. In 1993, the Thars purchased the parcel from the state, acquiring title in fee simple, and leased it to Gary Thar. This case arises out of an action for trespass brought by the Edwin N. Moran Revocable Family Trust against the Thars’ lessee. Moran maintains that the easement granted in 1976 is an easement in gross that is personal to the Thars and cannot be transferred to their lessee. The Thars insist that the easement is a commercial easement in gross and, as such, is an alienable property interest. Following a bench trial, the district court held that the easement is an easement in gross but that it was not assignable. III. DISCUSSION We choose not to answer the question of whether commercial 69 N.W. 709, 710-11 (1918) (<HOLDING>); Ludwig v. Gosline, 191 N.J.Super. 188, 465

A: holding that the burden on the servient estate cannot be increased without the consent of the owners of the servient estate and that the owner of the dominant estate to which the appurtenant easement is attached has no power to convey or expand use of that easement in connection with a tract of land owned by another
B: holding that an easement appurtenant to a freehold estate of a dowager expired with that estate
C: holding that an easement cannot be created in favor of an estate for years extending beyond the life of the estate
D: holding that an express easement ran with the dominant estate
C.