With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. . Appellant, Coty Williams, appeals the summaiy denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief, which alleged multiple grounds for relief. We find that Williams is entitled to an opportunity to amend 'His third and fifth grounds for relief. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 761 (Fla. 2007) (<HOLDING>); see also Ferris v. State, 996 So.2d 228, 229

A: holding that a defendant who files a legally insufficient rule 3850 motion for failing to meet pleading requirements should be allowed at least one opportunity to amend
B: holding that defendants 3850 motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred as successive where the defendants current rule 3850 motion is one that could have or should have been raised in his first rule 3850 motion
C: holding defendant was not barred from raising sentencing issue in rule 3850 motion by virtue of prior rule 3850 motion which did not raise any sentencing issues
D: holding that a plaintiff should be allowed to amend the complaint to add a claim
A.