With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". in nature, but is instead best understood as a prudential prerequisite to filing a clai “was discharged because of [her] age.” Slone included a slightly more detailed explanation: “I was informed that I was terminated for violation of the Health Information Privacy Act. I believe that I was discharged because of my age, 53, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).” We find this question to be a close one. Because administrative exhaustion does not raise a jurisdictional question under the ADEA, however, we may decline to decide the issue if reaching the merits of Allen’s and Slone’s disparate-impact claim provides a clearer basis for the disposition of the case. See State of Ohio ex rel. Celebrezze v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 868 F.2d 810, 813 (6th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). As discussed below, we conclude that the

A: holding that the court of appeals lacks the authority to overrule decisions of the supreme court of north carolina and has a responsibility to follow those decisions until otherwise ordered by the supreme court
B: holding that the supreme court has final appellate review of agency decisions
C: holding that because the merits of the plaintiffs underlying claims were sufficiently clear this court did not need to interpret the scope of a supreme court case discussing the reviewability of agency decisions
D: holding that this court does not have jurisdiction over plaintiffs claims because the court may review neither criminal matters nor the decisions of district courts
C.