With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". enhancements: (1) the two-level enhancement because the victims were in his custody, care or supervisory control (Counts I — III); (2) the two-level enhancement for committing a sex act by use of either force, threats or drugs, an intoxicant, or other similar substance without the persons’ knowledge (Counts I and II); (3) the two-level enhancement for distribution of pornography (Counts I-III); (4) the two-level enhancement for use of a computer (Counts IV-VI); and (5) the five-level enhancement for 600 or more images (Counts IV-VI). Arsenault does not argue that the sentencing judge failed to recognize the advisory nature of the Guidelines or his broad discretion to impose a non-Guidelines sentence. See Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007) (<HOLDING>). Rather, Arsenault contends that these

A: holding that sentencing judges can vary from guidelines ranges based on policy considerations including disagreements with the guidelines
B: holding district courts are entitled to vary from the guidelines based on a policy disagreement with those guidelines
C: recognizing district courts ability to vary from guidelines based on policy disagreement with sentencing range in cases involving child pornography
D: holding a district court has authority to vary from the crack cocaine guidelines based on a policy disagreement with them italics omitted
A.