With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". only partial or limited success.” Id. A district court determines the amount of the fee award based on the significance of the results obtained by the prevailing party. Id. at 437-38, 103 S.Ct. 1933. A. Plaintiff Is the Prevailing Party To qualify as a prevailing party under IDEA’S fee-shifting statute, a plaintiff “must obtain at least some relief on the merits of [her] claim.” Farrar, 506 U.S. at 111, 113 S.Ct. 566. This means that “[t]he plaintiff must obtain an enforceable judgment against the defendant from whom fees are sought, or comparable relief through a consent decree ....” Id. (internal citations omitted). Plaintiff must have been more than a mere catalyst for change that occurred without the need for judicial intervention. Buckhannon, 532 U.S. at 604-05, 121 S.Ct. 1835 (<HOLDING>). “In short, a plaintiff ‘prevails’ when actual

A: holding that prevailing party status may be conferred by interim judicial relief that alters the parties legal relationship
B: holding that the party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorneys fees
C: holding that it need not reach a decision on whether a party could prevail under buckhannon in the absence of a consent decree or a final judgment on the merits
D: holding that to be a prevailing party a plaintiff must obtain a judgment or judiciallyenforced consent decree a party does not prevail without a judicially sanctioned change in the legal relationship of the parties
D.