With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the victim that occurred over the roughly three-week period she lived with him and worked as a prostitute (that could have given rise to additional charges of child molestation) cannot mean that his counsel was ineffective in failing to request a charge on the lesser-included offense based on a specific incident for which there was no evidence that anything other than aggravated child molestation occurred. Indeed, we have previously held that “such failure cannot support a claim of ineffective assistance [when] as here the evidence does not reasonably raise the issue that [the defendant] may be guilty only of the lesser crime.” Furthermore, counsel’s testimony as to his theory of the case — i.e., that the victim was lying about Pepe- , 275 Ga. App. 671, 675 (3) (621 SE2d 616) (2005) (<HOLDING>). 45 See, e.g., Porras, 295 Ga. at 420 (3) n.8

A: recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel
B: holding that once counsel was appointed defendant spoke to the court through counsel and thus the court was not required to respond to defendants request for a speedy trial
C: holding that the defendants prior conviction was not obtained in violation of his right to counsel because he had the opportunity for appointed counsel at public expense
D: holding that trial courts admonishment when defendant interrupted pronouncement of sentence was not a violation of defendants right to allocution when at the sentencing hearing the defendants counsel spoke on his behalf
D.