With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". characterize the district court’s decision as being based upon a policy disagreement with the Sentencing Commission. The district court expressed disagreement with the decision to grant Wilson’s § 3582 motion in what the district court viewed as the absence of an appropriate assessment of the § 3553(a) factors specific to him that might counsel against a reduction, but the district court did not appear to question the policy underlying the general reduction in sentences. See R. 1623 (Tr. of April 15, 2015 Hearing at 18:2-24) (Page ID # 7326). In any event, contrary to Wilson’s argument, Appellant Br. at 11, we have held that district courts may base sentences on policy disagreements with a sentencing guideline. See United States v. Camacho-Arellano, 614 F.3d 244, 248-49 (6th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>) (quoting Spears v. United States, 555 U.S.

A: holding a district court has authority to vary from the crack cocaine guidelines based on a policy disagreement with them italics omitted
B: recognizing district courts ability to vary from guidelines based on policy disagreement with sentencing range in cases involving child pornography
C: holding district courts are entitled to vary from the guidelines based on a policy disagreement with those guidelines
D: holding that our prior rule that a district court lacked authority to premise a variance on disagreement with the policy of a guideline does not survive the supreme courts decision in kimbrough v united states 552 us 85 128 sct 558 169 led2d 481 2007  which was a recognition of district courts authority to vary from the  guidelines based on policy disagreement with them
D.