With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". it could have provided a cross reference to N.D.C.C. § 14-10-01, or it could have expressly stated so. However, N.D.C.C. § 14-10-01 expressly applies to the entire code unless otherwise specified; therefore, a cross reference to N.D.C.C. § 14-10-01 would be unneces sary and redundant. The Legislature has provided that the age of a child is calculated from the day on which the child is born. N.D.C.C. § 14-10-01. An unborn child is not a child or minor according to N.D.C.C. § 14-10-01, and an unborn child is not a child under N.D.C.C. § 19-0S.l-22.2(l)(b). Geiser, at ¶¶ 10-13. [¶ 17] Furthermore, we noted that if the legislature had expressly intended to criminalize endangerment of a child to include an unborn child it would have done so. See Geiser, at ¶ 17. Chapter 12.1-17.1, (<HOLDING>); Kilmon v. State, 394 Md. 168, 905 A.2d 306

A: holding a mothers ingestion of a controlled substance while pregnant does not constitute child abuse as an unborn child is not a person for purposes of criminal prosecution
B: holding an unborn child is a child for purposes of prosecuting chemical endangerment of a child
C: holding an unborn child is not a child for purposes of criminal prosecution of mistreatment of a child
D: holding a fetus is not a child person or individual for purposes of criminal prosecution under the reckless injury to a child statute
A.