With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to settle all disputes, whether arising out of the application of such agreements or otherwise, in order to avoid any interruption to commerce,” 45 U.S.C. § 152 (First). The broad command of Section 2 (First) fills the interstices of the explicit status quo provisions: A carrier or its employees may invoke it either to ensure effective compliance with the explicit status quo provisions, see Chicago & Nw. Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union, 402 U.S. 570, 578, 91 S.Ct. 1731, 29 L.Ed.2d 187 (1971) (“The strictest compliance with the formal procedures of the Act [the RLA] is meaningless if one party goes through the motions with ‘a desire not to reach an agreement.’ ”), or to further justify an injunction premised primarily on those provisions, see Shore Line, 396 U.S. at 152, 90 S.Ct. 294 (<HOLDING>). We thus conceive of this “implicit status quo

A: holding that a preliminary injunction was a reasonable means of preserving the status quo and was of the same character as the ultimate relief sought when a few but not all of the causes of action in the complaint were of an equitable nature including causes of action for unjust enrichment and imposition of constructive trust
B: holding that the stay put provision establishes a strong preference but not a statutory duty for maintenance of the status quo
C: holding that tull did not mandate a jury trial in a state environmentalenforcement action for injunctive relief and civil penalties where the civilpenalty statute contained multiple factors including equitable restitution and the legislatures statement of purpose emphasized the importance of protecting and maintaining the natural resources of the state and of preserving the status quo goals that were equitable  in nature
D: holding that the explicit status quo provisions together with   2 first form an integrated harmonious scheme for preserving the status quo from the beginning of the major dispute through the final 30day coolingoff period
D.