With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". S.Ct. 2151 (internal citations omitted). Further, the Supreme Court in Rush Prudential held [w]hatever the standards for reviewing benefit denials may be, they cannot conflict with anything in the text of the statute, which we have read to require a uniform judicial regime of categories of relief and standards of primary conduct, not a uniformly lenient regime of reviewing benefit determinations. 536 U.S. at 385, 122 S.Ct. 2151 (emphasis added and citation omitted). Thus, be cause Section 10-3-1116(3) requires insurance documents to provide a specific standard of review for a benefit denial and the right to a jury trial, the Court finds that Section 10-3-1116(3) is a law directed toward entities engaged in insurance. See Standard Ins. Co. v. Morrison, 584 F.3d 837, 842 (9th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>) (citations omitted); see also Am. Council of

A: holding claims for negligent procurement of insurance accrued on date the insured purchased the insurance policies
B: holding that a law which regulates what terms insurance companies can place in their policies regulates insurance companies
C: holding that a suicide exclusion regulates insurance and therefore falls within the insurance savings clause
D: holding that subcontractors primary and excess insurance policies must pay first and before contractors own insurance
B.