With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Richland County. And he does not contest Defendants’ assertion that he fails to advance arguments in favor of Monell liability against Richland County. We conclude that these sundry claims (and any others not addressed) fail because Tinney does not make supporting arguments in their favor. United States v. Johnson, 440 F.3d 832, 846 (6th Cir. 2006) (“[I]t is a settled appellate rule that issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived.”). To say a claim is triable does not replace arguing why the claim is triable. AFFIRMED 1 . Tinney substituted James Mayer, III after the unrelated death of James Mayer, II. 2 . Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Serv. of the City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978)

A: recognizing a claim for civil liability against municipalities  under  1983
B: holding that punitive damages are not recoverable against municipalities in actions brought pursuant to 42 usc  1983
C: recognizing such a claim under  1983
D: holding that municipalities unlike states are subject to suit under section 1983
A.