With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Chicago, 484 F.2d 602, 608 (7th Cir. 1973))). Cangelosi serves as an attorney for the LSBC, a professional licensing board that oversees cosmetology licenses in the State of Louisiana. The Louisiana Cosmetology Act (“Cosmetology Act”), La. Rev. Stat. § 37:561 et seq., empowers the LSBC to issue licenses and conduct investigations, inquiries, and hearings to ensure compliance with the Cosmetology Act. La. Rev. Stat. § 37:575. As an attorney for the LSBC, Cangelosi serves in a role that is “functionally comparable” to a prosecutor: Cangelosi initiates disciplinary proceedings, negotiates consent agreements, and presents evidence on behalf of the LSBC during hearings. These actions, which are prosecutorial. in nature, are entitled to absolute immunity. See Di Ruzzo, 480 Fed.Appx. at 797 (<HOLDING>). Cangelosi’s conduct in the cases of T.

A: recognizing absolute immunity for board members and the director of the mississippi state board of nursing
B: holding that prosecutors have absolute immunity
C: recognizing absolute immunity for attorneys of the texas medical board
D: holding that the considerations underlying absolute prosecutorial immunity at common law dictate the same absolute immunity under  1983
C.