With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". part by an officer’s interest in ensuring his own' protection and preventing a suspect’s flight during a Terry stop, most circuits today have approved police use of drawn weapons or handcuffs to restrain criminal suspects. Courts have' also permitted police to demand a suspect to lay prostrate on the ground during a stop and frisk search. In addition, .courts have allowed police to forcibly transport suspects (most notably to a patrol car) under a válid Terry stop. As a result, lower courts, while maintaining that Terry remains a limited exception, have authorized conduct similar to that associated with custodial arrest without converting that stop into a full-fledged arrest. Id. at 2805 (citations omitted); see also State v. Sheppard, 271 S,W.3d 281, 289 n. 28 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) (<HOLDING>). 33 . See Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70,

A: holding that the limits of fourth amendment protection relate to the boundary between arrest and pretrial detention
B: holding a fourth amendment terry detention is not a custodial arrest and the use of handcuffs does not automatically convert a temporary detention into a fourth amendment arrest
C: holding in the alternative that even if handcuffing a suspect did convert the detention into an arrest the arrest was justified by probable cause
D: holding that a search incident to a lawful arrest does not violate the fourth amendment
B.