With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". The report concludes that PCR-systems, including the polymarker, are “ready to be used.” NRC Report, supra, at 119. The report further confirms that the polymarker has been “validated with tests for robustness with respect to environmental insults,” and that “substantial information on population frequencies” exists for the polymarker loci. Id. at 72. We conclude that existing literature, combined with research shared at lectures and symposia, supports a finding that the polymarker test is generally accepted as reliable by the forensic science community. c. Judicial Opinions At the time of the Rule 104 hearing, both the State and the defense were unaware of any judicial opinion discussing polymarker evidence. See Wilkerson v. Pearson, 210 N.J.Super. 333, 336, 509 A.2d 818 (Ch.Div.1985) (<HOLDING>). Before the Rule 104 hearing, however, a New

A: holding that performance may be valid acceptance
B: holding that absence of judicial opinions demonstrating acceptance by other courts of particular type of scientific technique should not by itself foreclose finding of general scientific acceptance and reliability
C: holding that the doctrine of stare decisis applies to the issue of reliability of new scientific techniques the intoxilyzer in that case
D: holding that a valid contract requires acceptance of an offer
B.