With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to allege facts plausibly suggesting that Defendant is vicariously liable for Sean McGuigan’s tortious conduct. See Banque Worms v. Luis A. Duque Pena E Hijos, Ltda., 652 F.Supp. 770, 773 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (applying New York law and holding that “[a]n employer who is acting in good faith and who has not induced an employee to commit an intentional tort is not liable for the employee’s acts” (citations omitted)). As such, the Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs fraud, negligence and conversion claims since Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to establish that Defendant should be liable for Sean McGuigan’s tortious conduct. See id. (citation omitted); see also Compass Group, U.S.A., Inc. v. Mazula, 18 A.D.3d 1094, 1094-95, 795 N.Y.S.2d 395 (3d Dep’t 2005) (<HOLDING>); C.D. of N.Y.C., Inc. v. U.S. Postal Service,

A: holding that employers are not liable for conduct of ordinary employees because an ordinary employees conduct will normally be so unrelated to the employers business that it cannot be deemed in furtherance thereof
B: holding that existence of deliberate and informed consent turns on whether it is understood between the employee and his employers that he is to remain in the allegiance of the first employer  or is to be employed in the business and subject to the direction of the temporary employer
C: holding that  there is no vicarious liability on the part of the employer for torts committed by the employee solely for personal motives unrelated to the furtherance of the employers business  quotation and other citations omitted
D: holding that under louisiana law dishonest act exclusion in employers commercial liability policy excluded negligence and vicarious liability claims against employer for losses based upon the excluded conduct of its employee
C.