With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". plaintiff is the person or group of persons that (1) has filed the complaint or made a motion for appointment in response to a notice to class members about the pendency of the suit; (2) has the “largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class”; and (3) otherwise satisfies the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. § 78u — 4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(I). The presumption may be rebutted by proof from another class member that the presumptively most adequate plaintiff either (1) will not fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class; or (2) is subject to “unique defenses” that make that plaintiff incapable of adequately representing the class. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(II); see also Koos v. First Nat’l Bank of Peoria, 496 F.2d 1162, 1164 (7th Cir.1974) (<HOLDING>). At the hearing, the three movants with the

A: holding that after a class is certified the controversy may exist  between a named defendant and a member of the class represented by the named plaintiff even though the claim of the named plaintiff has become moot
B: holding that a named plaintiff is not a proper class representative where it is predictable that a major focus of the litigation will be on an arguable defense unique to the named plaintiff or a small subclass
C: holding that where named plaintiff was employee of class counsel district court did not abuse its discretion by denying class certification
D: holding that a class action may continue even though the claim of the named plaintiff has become moot
B.