With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". record is silent; there is no indication in the record that Fakeye was actually informed that a guilty plea could result in “deportation, the exclusion from admission to this country, or the denial of naturalization under federal law,” nor are there facts in the record that suggest that Fakeye knew the consequences of his plea. See Tex.Code CRiM. ProC. Ann. art 26.13(a)(4). However, the record does contain some evidence that Fakeye was not a United States citizen: (1) a motion in limine requested that there be no mention of “defendant’s immigration status in this country,” which was discussed at the hearing wherein Fakeye, age eighteen, pleaded guilty, (2) State’s exhibit twenty-two 62265, at *2 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth Feb.26, 2004, pet. refd) (not designated for publication) (mem.op.) (<HOLDING>). We sustain Fakeye’s sole issue. IV.

A: holding that appellant was not harmed where defendant never asserted that he was not a us citizen and no evidence in the record suggested he was not a us citizen
B: holding that citizen did not have standing where there was no showing of a procedural irregularity
C: holding that the plaintiffs speech was not constitutionally protected because it was made in his official capacity and there was simply no evidence that he was speaking as a citizen on a matter of public concern
D: holding that a limited liability company is a citizen of any state of which a member of the company is a citizen
A.