With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". see also Scott Timber Co. v. United States, 333 F.3d 1358, 1366 (Fed.Cir.2003) (stating that courts apply “general rules of contract interpretation in cases where the United States is a party to the contract.”). C. Disposition Of The Government’s March 8, 2002 Motion For Summary Judgment. The May 1, 1997 Contract contains a standard integration clause that provides: This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government’s solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual documents is [sic] necessary. Def.App. at 2. Therefore, as a matter of law, the terms of the contract must be construed based on the language in the governing documents, not parol evidence. See McAbee Const., Inc. v. United States, 97 F.3d 1431, 1434 (Fed.Cir. 1996) (<HOLDING>); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts §

A: recognizing presumption
B: recognizing this presumption
C: holding that where there is a strong presumption that the contract was  a fully integrated agreement coupled with the consistency of the evidence surrounding its execution with that presumption  the agreement was fully integrated
D: recognizing strong presumption against interlocutory appeals
C.