With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". defendant hide her hand in such a manner which was clearly indicative of her having either a small weapon or drugs closed in her palm. Additionally, after being repeatedly asked to open her hand, defendant continued to resist the officers’ efforts to alleviate their concern that she might be concealing a weapon. Under such circumstances, we conclude Officer Olsen’s use of pressure to open defendant’s hand was justifiable in view of the officers’ need to ensure that defendant was not in possession of a weapon capable of inflicting injury or that she would not destroy evidence. Moreover, we find no evidence which would indicate Officer Olsen’s use of pressure was overly intrusive as to render the seizure of the crack cocaine unreasonable. See Smith, 342 N.C. at 407, 464 S.E.2d at 45 (<HOLDING>); and State v. Watson, 119 N.C. App. 395, 458

A: holding that search of backpack constituted a search of defendants person and was not authorized by search warrant for premises
B: holding that requiring defendant to pull his pants down in the middle of an intersection so that police might search for cocaine was not intolerable in intensity and scope such that the search was unreasonably intrusive
C: holding that defendant was not in custody during search of his residence
D: holding that acquiescence to a strip and body cavity search did not extend the scope of defendants consent to search his person because of the highly intrusive nature of the search
B.