With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the accused. Jones v. United States, 477 A.2d 231, 237 (D.C. 1984); Campbell v. United States, 450 A.2d 428, 430 (D.C.1982). Such evidence may be admissible, however, if relevant to (1) motive, (2) intent, (3) absence of mistake or accident, (4) a common scheme or plan, or (5) identity. Drew v. United Stat who “rang doorbells, peered into windows, wandered between houses and bushes, posed as a salesman and workman, followed one woman, and gave an alias to an inquisitive police officer ... albeit strange, is not sufficiently ‘criminal’ to fall within Drew’s scope”); Evans v. United States, 417 A.2d 963, 966 (D.C.1980) (“there is no compelling inference that the use of a credit card bearing another’s name is a criminal act” constituting other crimes); see also, Jones, 477 A.2d at 237-38 (<HOLDING>); Punch v. United States, 377 A.2d 1353, 1358

A: holding that evidence was sufficient to prove defendant constructively possessed the gun where although defendant denied ownership of the gun it was found near a knife of which defendant claimed ownership and where defendant was aware of the presence of the gun
B: holding that evidence of appellants prior gun possession was admissible in a homicide prosecution to show malice and intent possession of a gun without more is not wrongful conduct
C: holding that evidence of a 10yearold drug conviction was properly admitted to show intent in a prosecution for possession with intent to distribute
D: holding direct testimony tying a defendant to a gun was not required when the gun was found in the defendants truck and when the defendant had both ammunition for the gun and a rack in which it could have been kept
B.