With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Place, 462 U.S. 696, 709, 103 S.Ct. 2637, 2645, 77 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983); see Cobb, 690 P.2d at 852 (officer may run a computer check for outstanding warrants during an investigatory stop provided that this procedure does not unreasonably extend the detention); see generally 4 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 9.2(f), at 58-65 (3d ed. 1996). Second, whether the officer diligently pursued the investigation during the detention. See United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 686, 105 S.Ct. 1568, 1575, 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985) (“[W]e consider it appropriate to examine whether the police diligently pursued a means of investigation that was likely to confirm or dispel their suspicions quickly, during which time it was necessary to detain the defendant.”); Place, 462 U.S. at 709, 103 S.Ct. at 2645 (<HOLDING>). Third, whether the suspect was required to

A: holding that reasonable suspicion justifies an investigatory detention
B: holding that police may briefly detain individuals for further investigation during a traffic stop as long as they can establish the reasonableness of the detention
C: holding that an officers diligent pursuit of an investigation during the detention is a factor in determining the reasonableness of an investigatory stop
D: holding that a detention was not unreasonable where officers though slowed down were diligent in their investigation
C.