With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (citing Carter; same); Stevens v. State, 823 So.2d 319, 321-22 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (“[T]he trial court abused its discretion in finding that the greater weight of the evidence supported findings that Stevens willfully and substantially violated her probation.”); Mier v. State, 58 So.3d 319, 321-22 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing Carter; holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding willful and substantial violation); Kaduk v. State, 959 So.2d 817, 818-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (citing Carter; same); Grizzard v. State, 881 So.2d 673, 675 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (quoting Carter’s statement that appellate court must determine whether trial court’s finding of willful and substantial violation was arbitrary, fanciful or unreasonable); Lane v. State, 761 So.2d 476, 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (<HOLDING>); Van Wagner v. State, 677 So.2d 314, 316 (Fla.

A: holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in excusing a juror for cause
B: holding trial court did not abuse its discretion by ruling based only on affidavits
C: holding that superior court did not abuse its discretion in finding that rule 60b6 motion was made within a reasonable time
D: holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding violation was willful and substantial
D.