With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". inspection advisory, examining, and appeals board in accordance with 208 not later than the 10th day after the date on which written notice of the action or determination is mailed....” Id. § 802.7. Section 208.3 then allows any person aggrieved by a decision or ruling by the board to appeal again to the district court of Dallas County within thirty days after receiving notice of the board’s decision. Id. § 208.3. Nothing in the record establishes that TCI attempted to appeal the revocation of its permit; therefore, it failed to take advantage of any of the administrative procedures for reviewing the revocation. Thus, the City was not given the opportunity to exercise its full discretion in considering plans for the building before TCI demolished it. See Mayhew, 964 S.W.2d at 929 (<HOLDING>). Because there was no final decision regarding

A: holding that as the court has made clear in several recent decisions a claim that the application of government regulations effects a taking of a property interest is not ripe until the government entity charged with implementing the regulations has reached a final decision regarding the application of the regulations to the property at issue
B: holding in land use situations courts have concluded in order for a regulatory takings claim to be ripe there must be a final decision regarding the application of the regulations to the property at issue
C: recognizing that the specific argument regarding an issue must be made in the trial court to preserve that issue for appellate review
D: holding that a plaintiffs takings claim was not ripe for review where the state court never explicitly reached the merits of their claim and no procedural bar existed to prevent review
B.