With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (Tex.1995) (citing Cosgrove v. Grimes, 774 S.W.2d 662, 665 (Tex.1989)). 61 . See Santosky, 455 U.S. at 759, 102 S.Ct. at 1398 (noting that juvenile delinquency adjudications, civil commitment, deportation, and denaturalization, at least to a degree, are all reversible official actions, but that, once affirmed on appeal, a New York decision terminating parental rights is final and irrevocable, and stating that "few forms of state action are both so severe and so irreversible”); In re A.K.V., 747 A.2d 570, 576-79 (D.C.Ct.App. 2000) (concluding that malpractice suit is not an apt remedy in termination cases and that monetary damages are wholly inadequate in such cases). 62 . In re A.K.V., 141 A.2d at 576-79. 63 . See In re T.R.R., 986 S.W.2d 31, 37 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Odoms v. Batts, 791 S.W.2d 677, 680

A: holding denial of a petition to vacate a termination order was reversible error
B: holding that a statute that provided that the court may appoint a guardian ad litem left the court with discretion to make an appointment
C: holding that trial courts failure to appoint parent an attorney ad litem in termination proceeding was reversible error constituting official mistake for purposes of bill of review
D: holding the trial court had jurisdiction where summons was served on the attorney advocate for the juveniles guardian ad litem
C.