With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". No. C-010206, 2001 WL 1386188. 53 . See Cincinnati v. Howard, 179 Ohio App.3d 60, 2008-Ohio-5502, 900 N.E.2d 689. 54 . State v. Krebs (Nov. 20, 1991), 1st Dist. No. C-910135, 1991 WL 243622. 55 . State v. Ussery (Mar. 4, 1987), 1st Dist. No. C-860108, 1987 WL 7422. 56 . State v. Bybee (1999), 134 Ohio App.3d 395, 731 N.E.2d 232. 57 . State v. Paulo, 1st Dist. No. C-050725, 2006-Ohio-4035, 2006 WL 2241698. 58 . State v. John hio-954, 926 N.E.2d 278. 63 . R.C. 2925.03(D)(2) and 2967.01(0). 64 . Strattman v. Studt (1969), 20 Ohio St.2d 95, 49 O.O.2d 428, 253 N.E.2d 749, paragraph six of the syllabus (quoted in Joseph at ¶ 20). 65 . Id. 66 . State v. Threatt, 108 Ohio St.3d 277, 2006-Ohio-905, 843 N.E.2d 164, ¶ 15 (quoted in Joseph at ¶ 20). 67 . Joseph at ¶ 18. 68 . See Simpkins at ¶ 20 (<HOLDING>); Purdy, supra. 69 . See Hernandez v. Kelly,

A: holding that a ruling of the trial court to which no error has been assigned becomes the law of the case and is not subject to review by the court of appeals
B: holding that a trial court is not required to reimpose the original sentence but has discretion to impose a new sentence within the statutory limits governing the offense for which she was convicted
C: holding that no court has the authority to substitute a different sentence for that which is required by law
D: holding that the sentence entered by the circuit court was illegal because the court had no authority to impose a sentence that exceeded the punishment fixed by the jury
C.