With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". defendant’s family responsibilities were not so “exceptional” as to justify a departure. Id. at 759. Finally, in United States v. Sweeting, 213 F.3d 95 (3d Cir.2000), the defendant was a single mother and the sole provider for five children, one of whom had a substantial neurological impairment. Id. at 104. The disabled child required special care to ensure that he exercised regularly, ate well, slept properly, and took his medication at the appropriate times. Id. at 107. The Third Circuit ruled that these factors did not make the case extraordinary, especially considering that “there is nothing in the record to suggest that [defendant] (and only [defendant]) can provide him with the care and attention he needs.” Id.; see also United States v. Dyce, 91 F.3d 1462, 1467-68 (D.C.Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Rushby, 936 F.2d 41, 42-43

A: holding evidence insufficient to terminate mothers parental rights under section c because mother made arrangements for adequate support of children evidence showed mother left children with father who maintained steady employment and adequately supported children mother knew that father would provide adequate support and mother left children pursuant to agreed divorce decree
B: holding that the district court erred when it departed based on defendants status as a single mother with three children under the age of four one of whom was being breastfed and where incarceration would require placing the children in foster care
C: holding that the trial court did not err in finding that a trust relationship existed between a foster mother and foster child where it found that the child immediately became attached to the foster mother and was confiding in her when she made statements admitted under the hearsay exception
D: holding care custody and control of children is a fundamental right
B.