With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". a closely held corporation alone does not automatically create a fiduciary relationship between co-shareholders or co-members. See Kaspar v. Thorne, 755 S.W.2d 151, 155 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1988, no writ); see also Pabich v. Kellar, 71 S.W.3d 500, 504 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g); Hoggett v. Brown, 971 S.W.2d 472, 488 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet. denied). And Texas courts have declined to recognize a broad formal fiduciary a formal fiduciary duty between co-shareholders of an LLC in the context of a redemption where the majority ownership interest had dominant control over the operation and management of the business); Vejara v. Levior Int’l LLC, No. 04-11-00595-CV, 2012 WL 5354681, at *5 (Tex. App.-San Antonio Oct. 31, 2012, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (<HOLDING>). Section 6.01 provides that the Lackners, as

A: holding that vejaras control and intimate knowledge of the companys affairs and plans gave rise to the existence of an informal fiduciary duty to levior
B: holding authority to control limits duty to control
C: holding that employers decision to merge plans did not invoke the fiduciary duty provisions of erisa
D: holding that a termination of an erisa plans benefits must be based upon the plans terms and language
A.