With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". argued at trial, this charge was based on Jones’s possession of the 4.46 grams of crack cocaine that he discarded in front of Officer Miles. Jones’s second argument therefore also fails for want of a correct premise. Jones also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction on Count IV. The 4.46 grams of crack cocaine packaged in eight smaller baggies that Officer Miles saw Jones throw down, his flight from Officer Miles and the large sum of small bills found on him at the time of his arrest on December 7, 2003 is more than sufficient evidence on which a reasonable jury could have found Jones guilty beyond a reasonable doubt for possession with intent to distribute the 4.46 grams of crack cocaine. See, e.g., United States v. White, 969 F.2d 681, 684 (8th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). Finally, it is Eighth Circuit policy not to

A: holding that simple possession of cocaine is not lesser included offense of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute
B: holding similar evidence sufficient to sustain a jury verdict of possession with intent to distribute cocaine
C: holding no unfair prejudice from admission of conviction for possession of 50 to 200 pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute as evidence of intent to distribute cocaine
D: holding that a prior conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine is admissible under rule 609
B.