With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. Brian Gomes seeks review of the sentences imposed on October 14, 2014 after he was resentenced pursuant to a successful Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. As a result of an apparent oversight by the trial court, the new sentencing order fails to award Gomes credit for time served on Count II in case number 2011-CF-632 and Count II in case number 2011-CF-633. On remand, the trial court is directed to remedy these omissions. Gomes also argues that his presence was required at resentencing. Under the facts of this case, any error was harmless. See Jordan v. State, 143 So.3d 335, 340 (Fla.2014) (<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED; • REMANDED for trial court to

A: holding that on direct appeal appellate court may remand for resentencing of all counts
B: holding in a rule 24035 proceeding that remand for resentencing proper in absence of evidence and finding that movant was a persistent offender
C: holding that defendant may be subject to death penalty on resentencing
D: recognizing that defendants absence from resentencing proceeding was harmless as defendant was serving longer sentences on counts not subject to resentencing and thus suffered no practical consequence as result of being resentenced in his absence
D.