With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of the Establishment Clause may “actually [be] a free exercise question.” Hill-Murray, 487 N.W.2d at 863. Nonetheless, we will address the state’s argument. No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, U.S. Const, amend. I, and no preference may be given by law to any religion or form of worship, Minn. Const. art. I, § 16. Exempting churches and church property from state laws that are otherwise generally applicable does not give rise to a violation of the Establishment Clause so long as no one religion is “favored over others and none sufferf ] interference.” State v. Am. Fundamentalist Church (In re Collection of Delinquent Real Prop. Taxes), 530 N.W.2d 200, 205 (Minn.1995) (quoting Walz v. Tax Comm’n, 397 U.S. 664, 677, 90 S.Ct. 1409, 1415, 25 L.Ed.2d 697 (1970)) (<HOLDING>). The state has not identified any Minnesota

A: holding that the endorsing requirement does not violate the establishment clause
B: holding moot a challenge to a florida tax exemption for church property when the law had been repealed
C: holding that tax exemption for church property does not violate establishment clause
D: holding that establishment of christmas day as legal public holiday did not violate establishment clause
C.