With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and (5) this action (or non-action) injured the plaintiff. Trenwick, 906 A.2d at 207. Under Rule 9(b), these types of allegations must be pled with particularity. Fed. R. Civ. P. 9. Specifically, a successful complaint must allege the factual circumstances relating to the “time, place, and contents of the false representations; the facts misrepresented; the identity of the person(s) making the misrepresentations; and what the person(s) gained from making the misrepresentations.” Trenwick, 906 A.2d at 207-08. Additionally, the complaint must identify a legal wrong suffered by the person bringing the suit. Thus, even if a claim satisfied both the elements and particularized pleading standard, it would still be non-actionable if brought by the wrong party. See Gagliardi, 683 A.2d at 1051 (<HOLDING>). In this case, the Amended Complaint fails to

A: holding that while a series of alleged misrepresentations may have been actionable by the persons who suffered a loss as a result of advancing funds in reliance on the statements it was not actionable when complained of by the company or its shareholders
B: holding that such conduct or the causing of the result must have been the persons conscious objective
C: holding that a shareholders status as a guarantor of a corporations debts did not give him standing to assert individual claims against a creditor of the corporation where the guarantees were never enforced and all of the injuries alleged were indirect damages suffered by the parties in their capacities as shareholders or employees
D: holding that loss to bank occurred without regard to its possible remedies when its funds in fact were diverted  through the fraud and dishonesty of its treasurer and that the bank could sue on its bond without proof that it had then sustained some actual defined loss not merely nominal as the result of the transaction in question
A.