With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". not be enough to excuse a party from not reading the Report, these factors in conjunction with the following factors do constitute good cause for finding that the notice was inadequate. First, the dates given for objecting to the proposed abandonment do not coincide with the period to file objections given under Rule 6007. Second, when the first meeting notice containing the future abandonment language was issued, the trustee had yet to examine the debtor. Finally, a determination as to what property would be abandoned was not made until one month after this notice was sent to interested parties. Therefore, the notice contained in Exhibit A is inadequate to act as the equivalent of a motion to abandon property. Accord Killebrew v. Brewer (In re Killebrew), 888 F.2d 1516 (5th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). (2) Abandonment Under 11 U.S.C. § 551(c) Even

A: holding that notice of judgment was insufficient
B: holding that a notice of deficiency was invalid where it was the second notice mailed for that year and the taxpayer timely petitioned the court as to the first notice
C: holding that the notice of abandonment contained in the notice of commencement of case was inadequate because it was vague as to what property would be abandoned
D: holding that notice to the attorney of record constitutes notice to the petitioner
C.