With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". on,” and that “my cash flow situation was somewhat limited.” (3) McMurrey testified that when he first met Stout in the spring of 1992, Stout told him he was “currently under indictment.” (4) Another witness, who attended AA meetings with Stout, testified that Stout told him in 1992 that he had legal problems and had been ordered to pay restitution, and that he would go to jail if he didn’t pay it. (5) The defense called to the stand a man who was-Stout’s victim in the underlying felony theft case. The victim, a gun show vendor who sold Stout a pistol and a framed piece of art, testified that Stout had given him a worthless check and that Stout had been ordered to pay restitution, but had only paid part of it. (6) On cross-examination, Stout admitted that he was not Cir.1977) (<HOLDING>); see also Martinez-Montoya v. I.N.S., 904 F.2d

A: holding that defendants prior felony convictions in georgia state court for drugrelated conspiracy and simple possession qualified as predicate prior felony drug offenses for  841b1a because under the plain language of the statute  felony drug offense includes any criminal conduct relating to narcotics including simple possession which a state has proscribed as a felony
B: holding that reversal of conviction for felony murder was required where jury failed to find the defendant guilty of the underlying felony as essential element of the felony murder offense
C: holding that a prior nonarizona conviction to be used as a prior felony conviction under the statute must both be for an offense that would constitute a felony in arizona and be classified as a felony in the other jurisdiction
D: holding that defendant truthfully stated on firearm purchase form that he had no felony convictions given the fact that adjudication of guilt was deferred and sentence suspended on his prior offense of felony receipt of a stolen car
D.