With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s order de novo, the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision for substantial evidence. See Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir.2012). We affirm. The ALJ reasonably interpreted the evidence regarding Harrison’s mental health limitations. The ALJ properly relied on Harrison’s record, including her mental health treatment notes and her daily functioning reports, to conclude that physician assistant Barnes’s opinion that Harrison would be “unable to hold a job,” was not sufficiently corroborated. See Molina, 674 F.3d at 1111-12 (<HOLDING>); Curry v. Sullivan, 925 F.2d 1127, 1130 (9th

A: holding the procedural right to request a onetime change of physician during the course of treatment does not attach until claimant actually begins treatment with the initially authorized physician
B: recognizing that a conflict with treatment history is a germane reason to reject a physician assistants opinion
C: holding that the alj is free to reject the opinion of any physician when the evidence supports a contrary conclusion
D: recognizing conflict
B.