With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". range of documents” such as “grand jury transcripts” and certain "warrant materials” that “traditionally [have] been kept secret for important policy reasons.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178. No party asserts this third standard is relevant here. 8 . This case differs slightly from Phillips, in which a nonparty sought access to court records previously filed under seal. Phillips, 307 F.3d at 1209. Here no third party seeks access to previously sealed documents, but this is a distinction without a difference. It is undisputed that a "strong presumption of access to judicial records applies fully to dispos-itive pleadings.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179. Accordingly, whether a third party has sought access is immaterial when a party moves to seal documents already filed with the court. See id. (<HOLDING>). 9 . "Relevant factors” include the "public

A: holding that the materials attached to the motion for summary judgment must be admissible and usable at trial
B: holding simply that  compelling reasons must be shown to seal judicial records attached to a dispositive motion
C: holding that the end of a conspiracy must be affirmatively shown
D: holding that it was appropriate to seal banking records when congress clearly mandated the privacy of those records
B.