With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". which the party requesting an arbitration has specified in the written notice of arbitration. Id. The undisputed evidence established that the Borough and the Union began collective bargaining on June 14, 2010, more than six months before the start of the fiscal year 2011. The Union, however, failed to comply with Section 4(a) of Act 111 by seeking a list of arbitrators on June 29, 2010 without bargaining with the Borough for at least 30 days, without declaring an impasse, and without listing any issues in dispute. In addition, the Union never served upon the Borough Council president written notice of arbitration containing specifications of issues in dispute, as required by Section 5 of Act 111. The Union did not properly demand an arb mis., 27 Pa.Cmwlth. 64, 366 A.2d 316, 318 (1976) (<HOLDING>). Without disputing its failure to comply with

A: holding that collective bargaining agreements cannot compel the arbitration of statutory rights
B: holding that arbitration award is binding on the parties
C: holding that proposed invalidation of the entire arbitration agreement even if the court were convinced that the plaintiff could not afford to pay for the arbitration proceedings was unnecessarily radical because the court could instead simply nullify the fee provisions of the arbitration agreement and force the defendant employer to bear the expense of arbitration
D: holding that the township could not be compelled to submit the disputes to binding arbitration because collective bargaining did not begin at least six months before the start of the new fiscal year and because the demand for binding arbitration was not made at least 110 days before the start of the new fiscal year
D.