With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". F.3d 1007, 1011 (9th Cir. 1994) (a defendant commits “two wrongs” when defendant’s actions violate both the Copyright Act and the Lanham Act; to “effectuate the purposes of both statutes, damages may be awarded under both”) affin’d 51 F.3d 281 (9th Cir.1995). See also Microsoft Corporation v. Compusource Distributors, Inc., 115 F.Supp.2d 800, 812 (E.D.Mich.2000) and Microsoft Corporation v. Logical Choice Computers, Inc., 2001 WL 58950 at *10 (N.D.Ill. Jan.22, 2001). Although the Second Circuit has yet to address the issue, at least one district court within the Second Circuit has held that a successful plaintiff may be awarded damages under both the Lanham Act and the Copyright Act. Viacom International Inc. v. Fanzine International, Inc., 2001 WL 930248, * 5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug.16, 2001) (<HOLDING>); Lyons Partnership, L.P. v. AAA Entertainment

A: recognizing that copyright offices interpretation of copyright act should ordinarily receive deference
B: holding that the copyright act distinguishes between employees and independent contractors for copyright possession
C: holding that a plaintiff may recover damages under both the lanham act and the copyright act provided the copyright damages serve a purpose other than compensation
D: holding that in order to recover damages under the lanham act plaintiff must prove that there was a violation that plaintiff has been damaged and that there is a causal connection between the violation and those damages
C.