With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court to give the instruction may amount to plain error “only in egregious instances.” Delgado, 672 F.3d at 341-42 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Nwankwo argues that his trial testimony raised a defense of necessity or duress. “As a general proposition a defendant is entitled to an instruction as to any recognized defense for which there exists evidence sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in his favor.” Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 63, 108 S.Ct. 883, 99 L.Ed.2d 54 (1988); accord United States v. Branch, 91 F.3d 699, 711-12 (5th Cir.1996). Nwankwo’s argument is unavailing, as his testimony did not present sufficient evidence satisfying the elements of a necessity or duress defense. See United States v. Posadar-Rios, 158 F.3d 832, 873-75 (5th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Gant, 691 F.2d 1159, 1162-63

A: recognizing that when a defendants negligence causes bodily injury the plaintiff can recover damages for past present and future medical expenses bodily injury and emotional distress
B: holding section 107a17bs plain language does not require that the actor actually intend death or serious bodily injury an object is a deadly weapon if the actor intends a use of the object in which it would be capable of causing death or serious bodily injury
C: holding that it was a double jeopardy violation to convict and sentence for both dui with serious bodily injury and driving without a valid license with serious bodily injury based on an injury to a single victim
D: recognizing that a justification defense requires a present imminent and impending threat which induced a wellgrounded fear of death or serious bodily injury
D.