With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". if any. And again, Herrington’s cited cases on this point are distinguishable and not to the contrary. For example, in In re Gould, irreparable harm existed because if the decision to set aside the sale and order rebidding was not immediately appealable, “doubts would linger in any subsequent sale of the property, impeding administration of the estate.” In re Gould, 977 F.2d at 1041; see also In re Irvin, 950 F.2d at 1319. Moreover, it is unpersuasive to argue, as Herrington does, that this case is comparable to appeals from the initial decision regarding the appointment of an examiner or trustee, which the Fourth Circuit has found to be final and immediately appealable. See Dalkon Shield, 828 F.2d at 241; see also In re Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc., 140 F.3d 463, 470 (3d Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). The decision to review on immediate appeal

A: holding such denial to be an immediately appealable collateral final order
B: holding that denial of counsel in section 1983 action is not immediately appealable
C: holding that order appointing trustee is immediately appealable and citing numerous cases
D: holding that an order of consolidation is interlocutory and not immediately appealable
C.