With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". nullifying a bargained-for contract provision,, namely coverage for potential legal liability, by means of a prior breach of its duty to defend. 2. Application In Kentucky, the interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law for the Court to decide. Kemper Nat’l Ins. Cos. v. Heaven Hill Distilleries, Inc., 82 S.W.3d 869, 871 (Ky.2002); see also Caudill Seed & Warehouse Co., Inc. v. Houston Cas. Co., 835 F.Supp.2d 329, 332 (W.D.Ky.2011). Unless there is an ambiguity, “a written' instrument will be enforcéd strictly according to its terms, and a court will interpret a contract’s terms by assigning language its ordinary meaning and without resort to extrinsic evidence.” Frear, 103 S.W.3d at 106; see also York v. Ky. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 156 S.W.3d 291, 293 (Ky.2005) (<HOLDING>). If, however, a contract is susceptible to

A: holding that statutory words must be given their ordinary contemporary meaning
B: recognizing that where the statutory language is not ambiguous  the plain and ordinary meaning of the statute must be given effect
C: holding that an appellate court must give a statute its clear and plain meaning when the statute is unambiguous
D: holding that the clear and unambiguous words of an insurance contract should be given their plain and ordinary meaning
D.