With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". what a reasonable person in Morgan’s position would have done in these circumstances. ¶ 33. This case is certainly distinguishable from cases this court and the Mississippi Supreme Court have found to fall ■within medical-malpractice statutes and require expert testimony. In Chitty, the plaintiffs claim arose out of what she alleged was an unnecessary biopsy and a fraudulent diagnosis of cancer. Chitty, 16 So.3d at 775-76 (¶ 4). So the rendering of a profession medical services itself was the source of the alleged injury. Id. at 779 (¶ 13). And expert testimony was required to determine whether a reasonable dermatologist would have performed a biopsy. Id. Here, Crosthwait was not undergoing a medical procedure. Cf. Kastler v. Iowa Methodist Hosp., 193 N.W.2d 98, 101-02 (Iowa 1971) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 34. Howell involved a patient’s fall.

A: holding that a hospitals bylaws are an integral part of its contractual relationship with the members of its medical staff
B: holding that a hospitals giving showers to its patients is not a professional activity
C: holding courts have held that hospitals have a duty to protect its patients from the tortious or criminal actions of third parties due to the special relationship between the hospital and the patient
D: holding that doctors do not have to accept patients
B.