With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". is in the best interest of the child.”). See In the Interest of C. A J., 331 Ga. App. 788, 790, n. 2 (771 SE2d 457) (2015). 3 Freeman v. State, 215 Ga. App. 341, 341-342 (450 SE2d 346) (1994). 4 Transport Indem. Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co., 198 Ga. App. 265, 266 (401 SE2d 294) (1990). 5 OCGA § 5-6-41 (f). See generally Hixson v. Hickson, 236 Ga. App. 894, 895 (1) (512 SE2d 648) (1999). 6 Holzmeister v. State, 156 Ga. App. 94 (1) (274 SE2d 109) (1980) (citations and punctuation omitted). 7 See generally Laviano v. Travelers Ins. Co., 276 Ga. App. 611, 612-613 (624 SE2d 189) (2005); Hickson, supra; Jahncke Service v. Dept. of Transp., 134 Ga. App. 106, 107 (1) (213 SE2d 150) (1975); see also Stephens v. Alan V. Mock Construction Co., 302 Ga. App. 280, 284 (1) (b) (690 SE2d 225) (2010) (<HOLDING>). 8 Rouse v. Arrington, 283 Ga. App. 204, 207

A: holding there to be no due process violation where excluded testimony bore none of the indicia of substantial trustworthiness that were crucial in chambers
B: holding that violation of city ordinance does not constitute negligence per se
C: holding hearing in chambers was not per se a violation of due process
D: holding that a cognovit clause which provided for judgment without notice or hearing was not unconstitutional per se because due process rights are subject to waiver
C.