With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of a concealed firearm on a prior instance is relevant to a charge of possession of a firearm in his car while he sought to transport drugs.... Introduction of a prior conviction for carrying a concealed weapon helped the government establish that Gomez was aware of the dangers of and law relating to concealed weapons and rebut Gomez’s claim that the gun was for an innocent purpose and its presence was mere accident or coincidence. The district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing such evidence. 927 F.2d 1530, 1534 (11th Cir.1991) (emphasis added); see also United States v. Coleman, — F.3d - (3d Cir.2003) (“Coleman put at issue during trial whether he had knowledge of, and thus possessed, the shotgun and narcotics found in the apartment in which he resi (2d Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 913

A: holding that evidence of prior criminal misconduct is admissible under rule 404b to prove motive opportunity intent preparation plan knowledge identity or absence of mistake or accident
B: holding that the introduction of evidence of previous instances in which the defendant had been present in an automobile with a shotgun were admissible under fed rules of evid 404b  to show that his presence in the car with the shotgun on the occasion in question was intentional and not a mistake or accident
C: holding that the sound of a television on the inside of the house and the presence of a car in the driveway were sufficient to form the basis of the reasonable belief that the suspect was in the home
D: holding that rule 404b evidence is admissible in rebuttal
B.