With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". him to use an expert to evaluate the documents voluntarily produced. To a large extent, the court reads this third objection to be an invitation to the court to re-try the contentions of the parties before the arbitration panel and to make anew all factual and legal determinations. This the court is not permitted to do, under any standard applicable t his appeal of the arbitration award. Hoffman contends that the requirement in the NGFA rules that he pay the entire award by certified check to be held by the NGFA secretary prior to appealing only allows the wealthy and financially liquid to use the NGFA’s arbitration appeals system. This challenge can only be construed as a challenge to the “fundamental fairness” of the NGFA arbitration process. See P & P Indus., Inc., 179 F.3d at 870 (<HOLDING>). As his fifth challenge, Hoffman asserts that

A: recognizing review for fundamental unfairness as an independent extrastatutory ground
B: recognizing such a ground for judicial review of arbitration awards in this circuit
C: holding that section 34810 is an adequate and independent state ground
D: holding right to be fundamental
A.