With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to the requested clarifications, their attorney noted that the only lien the Shermans were aware of was from a health-insurance provider. 3 See OCGA § 13-6-11 (“The expenses of litigation generally shall not be allowed as a part of the damages; but where the plaintiff has specially pleaded and has made prayer therefor and where the defendant has acted in bad faith, has been stubbornly litigious, or has caused the plaintiff unnecessary trouble and expense, the jury may allow them. ng that binding agreement was reached when communications demonstrated an unequivocal acceptance of demand terms and “contained no language conditioning acceptance upon execution of the particular release form . . . provided with” acceptance letter); Smith v. Hall, 311 Ga. App. 99, 102 (714 SE2d 742) (2011) (<HOLDING>). Compare McReynolds v. Krebs, 290 Ga. 850,

A: holding that a release between two parties cannot bind a thirdparty who was a stranger to the release
B: holding that release discharges only persons named in or sufficiently described by terms of release
C: holding that inclusion of a general release was merely a suggestion of how to terminate the lawsuit and that acceptance was not qualified on use of the specific release and party was willing to discuss the terms of a release
D: holding that a release of unknown claims has no effect in the absence of evidence apart from the words of the release
C.