With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". knew the vehicle Appellant was driving had been stolen; Michael Brooks had previously informed Investigator Hilliard that Appellant was currently driving a stolen Dodge truck and that Appellant had taken the VIN plate from a Dodge truck he owned and placed it onto the stolen Dodge truck he was driving. And Investigator Hilliard had previously seen a Dodge truck on Appellant’s property with a missing VIN plate. This reasonably trustworthy information gave the officers probable cause to arrest Appellant without a warrant for committing the offenses of theft, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, or tampering with vehicle identification numbers. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 31.03, .07(a) (Vernon 2003), .11(a) (Vernon Supp. 2009); Brown v. State, 986 S.W.2d 50, 52 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1999, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). . Because the arresting officers witnessed

A: holding computer database report indicating vehicle was stolen provided officers with probable cause to make warrantless arrest of driver
B: holding that the police officers had probable cause to make a warrantless entry
C: holding that the officers examination revealed that there was probable cause to believe that the property was stolen
D: holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment
A.