With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". worker visa process begins with a religious organization (the petitioner) filing an 1-360 Petition on behalf of the intended religious worker (the beneficiary). Id. at § 204.5(m). The petition is reviewed by the USCIS, and if it is approved, the beneficiary-religious worker can apply for a visa either from abroad or for adjustment of his or her status to a lawful permanent resident if he or she is already in the United States. If, as here, an 1-360 Petition is denied, only the petitioning party has the ability to appeal the denial, not the prospective beneficiary. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(iii)(B) (stating that those who have standing to appeal a denied petition does not “include the beneficiary of a visa petition”). See also Echevarria v. Keisler, 505 F.3d 16, 18 (1st Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>); Gunduz v. U.S.C.I.S., Civil Action No.

A: holding that a  2255 petition seeking only reinstatement of the right to a direct appeal does not render any later petition a second or successive petition under the aedpa
B: holding that a petitioner may amend a habeas petition rather than filing a second or successive petition when the first petition has not yet reached a final decision
C: holding that the approval of the petitioners 1130 petition did not permit him to remain in the united states
D: holding that the beneficiary of a form 1130 visa petition did not have standing to challenge a denied petition
D.