With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Alleged Error in Computing Criminal History Appellant argues that the district court erred in determining that his New Hampshire conviction for selling cocaine on October 30, 1992, was a “prior sentence” resulting in an additional two points being added to his criminal history computation pursuant to section 4A1.2(a)(l) of the Sentencing Guidelines. U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(l). Appellant argues that his conduct in violation of section 1326(b)(2) came to light only through his arrest for selling cocaine. Since “he was found in this country in the process of committing that [state] offense”, Appellant argues that the offense conduct of selling cocaine should be viewed as part of the instant offense and not counted as a prior sentence. See Trial Transcript (Aug. 30, 1993) at 29-30. T 1) (<HOLDING>). Whether or not the “prior sentence” and the

A: holding that possession of a firearm by a felon is a serious offense for  3162a2 purposes
B: holding that to apply the firearm enhancement the firearm need only reflect the context of the defendants possession and the defendants ability to use the firearm to promote the controlled substance offense
C: holding that defendants state court conviction for possessing a stolen car was severable from federal offense of being a felon in possession of a firearm even though firearm was found in cars trunk at time of defendants arrest for state stolen vehicle charge
D: holding district court lacked discretion to permit defendant to stipulate to prior conviction in prosecution for being a felon in possession of a firearm
C.