With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". violation of the discharge injunction, even though the debtors admitted that defendant’s conduct had not caused them to suffer any actual damages. Laws, 2007 WL 1121266, *3, 2007 Bankr.LEXIS 1252 at *9. See also, Lohmeyer, 365 B.R. at 754 (allowing debtors to amend complaint to include allegations of actual injury); Schramm v. TMS Mortgage, Inc. (In re Schramm), No. 01-11026, 2006 Bankr.LEXIS 4470 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio, July 6, 2006) (denying motion to dismiss counts pertaining to violation of the discharge injunction); Braun v. Champion Credit Union (In re Braun), 152 B.R. 466 (N.D.Ohio 1993) (affirming bankruptcy court’s imposition of sanctions against creditor for violation of the discharge injunction); and Beck v. Gold Key Lease, Inc. (In re Beck), 272 B.R. 112, 114 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.2002) (<HOLDING>). To dismiss on procedural grounds alone would

A: holding that plaintiff does not have a private right of action under  524 but dismissal  was not warranted because plaintiff has also alleged that creditor should be held in civil contempt for violating the discharge injunction
B: holding that the proper ground for dismissal of a  1983 action in which the plaintiff has failed to establish state action is lack of jurisdiction
C: holding that no private cause of action exists under  105 for  524 violations
D: holding that a private right of action exists
A.