With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (2010) (finding that "control” is defined as " 'exercise[ing] power or influence overt]' ” and that as "person in a position of trust” defendant was able to exercise sufficient control over victim to uphold conviction). As these cases make clear, one who qualifies under the statute may exert "control” not constrained by temporal circumstances. 15 . Any suggestion that somehow this Court’s precedent would compel a different outcome based on the facts of this case is misplaced. See Edmonds, 226 W.Va. 464, 702 S.E.2d 408 (upholding conviction where maintenance worker/occasional volunteer at a Christian school picked child up in his van and took her to a house he was remodeling where he sexually assaulted her); State ex rel. Harris v. Hatcher, No. 13-1236, 2014 WL 2439902 (May 29, 2014) (<HOLDING>). Justice KETCHUM, dissenting: The defendant

A: holding that whether bus driver who sexually assaulted student at both her house and his merely creates jury issue on operative elements of west virginia code  618d5a
B: holding that juveniles use of the f word in dispute with principal and another student over whether student had stolen her money did not constitute fighting words
C: holding that fraud creates an exception to the rule
D: holding that schools failure to expel harassing student and permitting her to return following suspension and board plaintiffs bus did not constitute requisite affirmative act for  statecreated danger
A.