With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". U.S. at 249, 106 S.Ct. 2505. However, “[t]he mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the [nonmoving party’s] position will be insufficient.” Id. at 252, 106 S.Ct. 2505. With these principles in mind, the court turns to an analysis of the pending motions for summary judgment. III. APPLICABLE LAW AND DISCUSSION The court will first determine whether the undisputed facts of this case establish that CBC has violated the players’ claimed right of publicity. Only if that right is violated need the court consider whether under the facts of this case federal copyright law preempts the right of publicity and/or whether the First Amendment trumps the right of publicity. See Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141, 161, 109 S.Ct. 971, 103 L.Ed.2d 118 (1989) (<HOLDING>). Nevertheless, the court will discuss each of

A: holding that wjhere such a transaction involves commerce within the meaning of the federal arbitration statute the state law and policy with respect thereto must yield to the paramount federal law
B: holding that state laws must yield to federal law when the former poses a substantial threat to federal laws ability to accomplish its mission
C: recognizing state laws can be preempted by federal regulations as well as by federal legislation
D: holding the statutory scheme of two federal laws was not void for vagueness and did not violate equal protection or due process even though the defendants conduct violated both laws
B.