With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". and Commerce Comm., Request for a House Bill 368 Hearing, in H. Jud. Comm. File for H.B. 368 (Jan. 12, 1990). 47 . AS 18.56.300(b). 48 . AS 18.56.300(e)(3)(B). 49 . Rep. C.E. Swaekhammer, Sectional Analysis for House Bill 368, in H. Jud. Comm. File for H.B. 368 (Jan. 12, 1990). 50 . Letter from Alaska Northern Chapter of International Conference of Building Officials to Rep. C.E. Swaekhammer, Ref. “An Act relating to residential housing assistance provided by the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation,” in H. Jud. Comm. File for H.B. 368 (Dec. 6, 1989). 51 . Letter from Jack Chenoweth, Legislative Counsel, to Rep. C.E. Swaekhammer, in H. Jud. Comm. File for H.B. 368 (Jan. 20, 1990). 52 . AS 18.56.300(e)(3)(A)-(D). 53 . See Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. LeResche, 663 P.2d 923, 931 (Alaska 1983) (<HOLDING>). 54 . AS 44.62.100; Chevron U.S.A., 663 P.2d

A: holding that statutory notice provisions for notice of default and opportunity to cure were waived by provisions of note as to one obligor though provisions applied to coobligor who used property as residence
B: holding that construction that neutralizes any provision of a contract should not be adopted if the contract can be construed to give effect to all provisions
C: holding that specific statutory provisions take priority over general statutory provisions
D: holding that rule of construction that specific statutory provisions control general ones should not be applied where provisions can be harmonized
D.