With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". as the Court deems appropriate.”); Hamed v. Hamed, 63 V.I. 529, 541 n.7 (V.I. 2015); Percival v. People, 62 V.I. 477, 491 (V.I. 2015). And despite the fact that we denied the motion to dismiss on the ground that standing is not a jurisdictional doctrine in the Virgin Islands, Hamed reasserted his standing argument at oral arguments before this Court. We therefore take this opportunity to reaffirm that “standing” — as that concept is understood in federal constitutional law — does not exist in any form in Virgin Islands courts. Although this Court has discussed issues of “standing” in recent cases, those discussions took place in the context of statutes granting rights to particular individuals in various contexts. See, e.g., Rennie v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp., 62 V.I. 529, 547 (V.I. 2015) (<HOLDING>); Hansen v. O’Reilly, 62 V.I. 494, 511 (V.I.

A: holding that an atwill employee may bring a cause of action under section 1981
B: holding that for the purposes of standing to bring an action to recover on a contract privity is established by proving the defendant was a party to an enforceable contract with either the plaintiff or a party who assigned its cause of action to the plaintiff
C: recognizing private right of action
D: holding that an employmentdiscrimination statute conferred standing on an employee to bring a private cause of action
D.