With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". transfer against Mr. Hovis under the Illinois Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, 740 ILCS, the Complaint is clear that the Plaintiff asserts such right “as incorporated by Section 544 of the Bankruptcy Code.” (Id.) Moreover, even if state law creates a cause of action for creditors such as Better Hearing individually to avoid fraudulent transfers of assets which hinder the creditor’s ability to collect a separate debt, because such cause of action is for “an injury common to all creditors” and “only in an indirect manner,” it is one of “the kinds of claims that may be brought only by the trustee in bankruptcy.” Teknek, 563 F.3d at 645-46. See also Id. at 646 (citing Am. Nat’l Bank of Austin v. MortgageAmerica Corp. (In re MortgageAmerica Corp.), 714 F.2d 1266, 1277 (5th Cir. 1983) (<HOLDING>)). Better Hearing Has Not Been Granted

A: holding that a fraudulent transfer claim against a corporate debtors control person belongs to the corporate debtor not to specific creditors
B: holding that the general corporate laws are incorporated into the corporate charter
C: holding that because an action under the texas fraudulent transfers act is essentially one for property that properly belongs to the debtor the cause of action belongs to the debtor
D: holding that grand jury testimony of officer and inhouse counsel for corporate defendant was properly admitted as admission against the corporate defendant
A.