With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". where a party wishing to challenge an arbitrator’s jurisdiction has no right of direct review, we think the Authority’s decision to permit such a challenge as a defense to an unfair labor practice complaint is a quite reasonable procedural interpretation of its statute and not an arbitrary deviation from its normal practice. III. Petitioner, taking the position the FLRA initially espoused, argues that the language in section 4110, “The decision of the Administrator shall be final,” does not necessarily suggest an intention to preclude procedural relief under other federal employee relations statutes. But, as our sister circuits have noted, the legislative history does support the Authority’s present view. VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn. v. FLRA, 705 F.2d 953, 956 (8th Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>); VA Medical Center, Northport, N.Y. v. FLRA,

A: holding the circuit court has exclusive jurisdiction over condemnation proceedings
B: holding section 4110 exclusive so there is no obligation for the va to bargain over proposals pertaining to alternative means of resolving grievances over alleged professional misconduct
C: holding that the court had no jurisdiction over an alleged breach of a plea agreement
D: holding over
B.