With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Academy, 531 U.S. at 295 n. 2, 121 S.Ct. 924 (“If a defendant’s conduct satisfies the state-action requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment, the conduct also constitutes action 'under color of state law' for § 1983 purposes.”). 5 . The Tenth Circuit has held that the New Mexico State Bar's employment of a lobbyist "to influence members of the State Legislature on issues of public policy” constituted "state action.” Arrow v. Dow, 636 F.2d 287, 289 (10th Cir.1980). Arrow is not inconsistent with our holding. In Arrow, unlike here, the entity that hired the lobbyist was a state agency. See id. (noting that the Supreme Court of New Mexico created the Bar, adopted its governing rules, and required all lawyers to be members). See also Hass v. Or. State Bar, 883 F.2d 1453, 1460 (9th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>); Barnard v. Chamberlain, 897 F.2d 1059, 1062

A: holding that plaintiffs complaint failed to state a claim under section 1 of the sherman act
B: holding that there is no doubt that the oregon bar is a public body akin to a municipality for the purposes of the state action exemption from the sherman act
C: holding ban violated the sherman act
D: holding that a plaintiff may state a claim under the sherman act for a defendants enforcement of a patent procured by fraud on the pto where the plaintiff alleges deliberate fraud and the other elements of a monopolization claim under section 2 of the sherman act
B.