With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". proceedings ... [under] the Juvenile Court Act of the District of Columbia, not on the right to assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment.” Cradle v. Peyton, 208 Va. 243, 245-47, 156 S.E.2d 874, 876-77 (1967). Appellant has cited no controlling legal authority providing that a juvenile defendant has a constitutional right to a transfer hearing before being treated as an adult. The cases he cites provide, at most, that juvenile proceedings, including transfer proceedings, when provided for by statute, “ ‘must measure up to the essentials of due process and fair treatment.’ ” Anderson v. Commonwealth, 15 Va.App. 226, 229, 421 S.E.2d 900, 902 (1992) (quoting Kent, 383 U.S. at 562, 86 S.Ct. at 1058); see Cheeks v. Commonwealth, 20 Va.App. 578, 583-86, 459 S.E.2d 107, 109-11 (1995) (<HOLDING>); see also Lewis v. Commonwealth, 214 Va. 150,

A: recognizing juveniles right to counsel in certain juvenile proceedings
B: holding 1 record must affirmatively show summons with which juvenile was served for jurisdiction to vest in juvenile court and 2 no jurisdiction existed despite juveniles attendance because no affirmative showing of service was made
C: holding that procedure for juvenile transfer appeal review in circuit court under former code  161269e was jurisdictional and that failure to provide juvenile with statutory review that complied with due process as spelled out in kent  required that juveniles convictions be vacated
D: holding juveniles statement inadmissible when after being placed in custody police took juvenile to police station and held juvenile in area where adult suspects were held instead of taking juvenile to a juvenile processing office or any of the places listed as an alternative in section 5202 and placing juvenile in specifically designated office for juveniles
C.