With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". The trial court further concluded that it was “an abuse of discretion to single out and penalize [Woodruff] for the same circumstances presented by and to other license holders.” While the board of county commissioners of the county in which an applicant for a retail liquor license seeks to operate “shall have discretion to approve or disapprove the application depending on whether it deems the applicant a suitable person to hold such license and whether it considers the proposed location suitable,” SDCL 35-2-1.2; Luke v. Mellette Cnty., 508 N.W.2d 6, 7 (S.D.1993), this court’s scope of review of a trial court’s decision in a trial de novo is whether the decision of the trial court was clearly erroneous. See Yadco, Inc. v. Yankton Cnty., 89 S.D. 651, 237 N.W.2d 665, 669-70 (1975) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, the issue presented on appeal is

A: holding that such a decision was within the trial courts discretion
B: holding that the supreme courts proper scope of review of a trial courts decision in a trial de novo of an assessment matter is whether the decision of the trial court was clearly erroneous
C: holding that the proper review for the trial courts application of the law is de novo
D: holding that when trial courts decision turns on question of law appellate review is de novo
B.