With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or receive support from a putative parent. Industrial Trans., 344 F.Supp. at 1316-17. This Court also relied on a First Circuit holding that the “dependent relative” definition employed by the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act, which resembles the paternity standard set forth in Georgia workers’ compensation law, is instructive in determining the paternity standard under DOHSA. In re United States, 418 F.2d 264, 271 (1st Cir.1969). Georgia law bears out the logic of this Court’s earlier holding; it clearly permits both legitimate and illegitimate children to recover in workers’ compensation or wrongful death actions without requiring the type of “legitimization” necessary for inheritance purposes. See Edenfield v. Jackson, 251 Ga. 491, 306 S.E.2d 911, 915 (1983) (<HOLDING>); Walden v. John D. Archbold Memorial Hosp.,

A: holding that statute which became effective after claimants death but prior to the trial of wrongful death case was remedial constitutional and governed pending litigation proceedings that were pending when statute was enacted
B: recognizing cause of action for wrongful death
C: holding unconstitutional a state wrongful death statute which denied illegitimate children the right to recover for the wrongful death of their mother
D: holding both legitimate and illegitimate children to be proper claimants under georgia wrongful death statute
D.