With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". authority. Miss.Code Ann. § 79-29-303(1) (emphasis added). Moreover, “[n]o act of a manager or member in contravention of a restriction on authority shall bind the limited liability company to persons having knowledge of the restriction.” Miss.Code Ann. § 79-29-303(4). In this case, the Bankruptcy Court correctly found that Earwood was not authorized to convey title to Northlake and that Northlake had knowledge of the unauthorized act because Earwood owned North-lake. Earwood could not bind Kinwood. Miss.Code Ann. § 79-29-303(1). The question, however, is whether a subsequent BFP thereafter obtains clear title. No Mississippi court has ever considered these statutory provisions in light of a claimed BFP. Thus, this Court considered the rules of statutory construction and th pp.2002) (<HOLDING>). Although Mississippi has not considered the

A: holding void ab initio ordinance proscribing punishment in excess of that authorized in charter
B: holding that an action taken in violation of the automatic stay is void ab initio
C: holding that a state court judgment that modifies a discharge in bankruptcy is void ab initio and the rookerfeldman doctrine would not bar federal court jurisdiction
D: holding that minors have authority to ratify or avoid conveyances upon reaching majority at which point conveyances become void ab initio
D.