With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of not guilty and the resulting trial”) (citation omitted); People v. Crouch, 64 Mich.App. 98, 235 N.W.2d 74, 75 (1975) (reversing where prosecutor commented on defendant’s election of a trial by jury, because “[t]o argue to a jury that a defendant should, in effect, be penalized because he chose to exercise those rights guaranteed to him by the constitutions, Federal and state, is gross incurable error”) (citations omitted); Brooks v. State, 763 So.2d 859, 864 (Miss.2000) (reversing based on the prosecutor’s remarks regarding defendant’s failure to plead guilty and exercise of his right to a jury and analogizing to cases where reversal was based on improper argument concerning a defendant’s decision not to testify); State v. Thompson, 118 N.C.App. 33, 454 S.E.2d 271, 276-77 (1995) (<HOLDING>); State v. Tumbleson, 105 Ohio App.3d 693, 664

A: holding that prosecutors comments asserting defendant was hiding behind the law and sticking the law in somebodys eye was improper comment on the right to a jury trial but was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
B: holding the state failed to meet its burden of showing the erroneous jury instruction was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where it did not address the issue on appeal
C: holding that testimony at trial in violation of defendants constitutional confrontation right was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because the testimony was cumulative
D: holding that trial court must determine whether fifth amendment violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
A.