With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the United States. Lucero v. Operation Rescue, 954 F.2d 624, 627 (11th Cir.1992); see also Saville v. Houston County Healthcare Auth., 852 F.Supp. 1512, 1537 (M.D.Ala.1994). The second element of the cause of action requires the Plaintiffs to make a showing that the Defendants’ actions were motivated by racial or other class-based invidious discrimination. Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 102, 91 S.Ct. 1790, 1798, 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971); Lucero, 954 F.2d at 627. In this case, all of the Plaintiffs except possibly for Louise Cleckley have failed to present evidence to show that they are members of a protected class. For the purpose of this motion, the court will assume, without holding, that gender-based discrimination is actionable under § 1985(3). See Saville, 852 F.Supp. at 1538 (<HOLDING>). In her case, however, the Plaintiffs have

A: holding that  19853 protects women as a class
B: holding that the fourth amendment protects people not places
C: holding that it is error to certify class when named class representatives are not members of the class they purport to represent
D: recognizing a narrow class of cases in which the termination of the class representatives claim for relief does not moot the claims of the class members
A.