With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". § 1981 claims of discriminatory termination, harassment, and hostile environment); Lewis v. American Foreign Serv. Ass’n, 846 F.Supp. 77, 79 (D.D.C.1993) (denying judgment as a matter of law denied a reasonable jury could find that defendant retaliated against plaintiff for filing EEOC charge, in violation of § 1981); Freeman v. Atlantic Ref. & Mktg. Corp., No. 92-7029, 1994 WL 156723, at *8 (E.D.Pa. Apr. 28, 1994) (stating that § 1981 extends to the same broad range of employment actions and conditions as Title "VII); Toney, 784 F.Supp. at 1547 (stating that if § 1981(b) were applied retroactively, plaintiffs allegations of racial harassment and retaliatory discharge would state a cause of action under § 1981); Goldsmith v. City of Atmore, 782 F.Supp. 106, 106-08 (S.D.Ala.1992) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the Augat’s Motion for Partial

A: holding that a plaintiff who proves a cause of action under  1981 may recover punitive damages where the plaintiff is entitled to an award of compensatory damages even if nominal
B: holding that a plaintiff could not assert a  1981 claim based on gender discrimination
C: holding that retaliatory discharge demotion or other adverse employment claims state a cause of action under  1981
D: holding that plaintiff is entitled to assert claim of retaliatory transfer under  1981
D.