With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Enterprises, Inc., 130 Misc.2d 25, 494 N.Y.S.2d 974 (N.Y.Sup. Ct.1985), reversed on other grounds, 117 A.D.2d 1015, 499 N.Y.S.2d 558 (granting summary judgment to tire and rim trade association on negligence claims predicated on promulgation of faulty product standards, because association neither owed nor voluntarily undertook a duty to plaintiff); Howard v. Poseidon Pools, Inc., 133 Misc.2d 50, 506 N.Y.S.2d 523 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1986), affirmed in relevant part, 134 A.D.2d 926, 522 N.Y.S.2d 388 (N.Y.Ct.App.1987) (granting summary judgment to swimming pool trade association on negligence claims, even though association had published minimum safety standards, because it owed no duty to plaintiff or to control the manufacturer); Meyers v. Donnatacci, 220 N.J.Super. 73, 531 A.2d 398 (1987) (<HOLDING>); Friedman v. F.E. Myers Co., 706 F.Supp. 376

A: holding that if a user actually knows of the danger a failure to warn cannot be a proximate cause of the injury
B: holding trade association voluntarily assumed the duty to warn because manufacturers relied upon assurances
C: holding that the defendant trade association which did not manufacture sell distribute design test conduct safety research on or set standards for the product could not be held to have owed a duty to the plaintiff
D: holding that by promulgating safety standards for residential inground swimming pools a trade association did not assume a duty to warn consumers of the danger of shallow diving
D.