With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Decl.”) ¶ 6. On the basis of this additional review, the agency determined that declassification was warranted for four pages, which it subsequently released, and that the remaining pages still qualified for “Secret”-level classification. Id. The Court is therefore satisfied with the FBI’s “plausible assertion that information [was] properly dassified[.]” Shapiro, 239 F.Supp.3d at 121, 2017 WL 908179 at *13. Turning to Exemption 3, the FBI applied this exemption to redact information that would either “reveal classified intelligence sources and methods [also] protected by Exemption 1 .., [or] unclassified intelligence sources and methods [that] were employed as law enforcement techniques,’ procedures or guidelines[.]” First Hardy Decl. ¶ 57; see Sims, 471 U.S. at 176, 105 S.Ct. 1881 (<HOLDING>). Reacting to the FBI’s somewhat concluso-ry

A: holding that even when the information is crucial to a litigants case reporters should be compelled to disclose their sources only after the litigant has shown that he has exhausted every reasonable alternative source of information
B: holding as a matter of federal law that  1681eb at least sometimes covers  incomplete information as well as technically inaccurate information
C: holding that the nsa covers unclassified information regarding intelligence sources and methods
D: holding performance not deficient because counsel gathered a substantial amount of information and then made a reasonable decision not to pursue additional sources
C.