With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". The memorandum disposition filed on July 7, 2010, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order. MEMORANDUM Franklin Agustín Garcia-Aucca, native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. See Bromfield v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). We deny the petition for review. The BIA did

A: holding that the jurisdiction stripping provision found at 8 usc  1252a2c applies only to removal orders not to applications for asylum withholding of removal or cat relief
B: holding that where a petitioner fails to establish a claim for asylum on the merits his claims for withholding of removal under the ina and cat also necessarily fail
C: holding that petitioners failure to exhaust the adverse credibility finding precluded this court from having jurisdiction to consider her claims of asylum withholding of removal and cat
D: holding that when the asylum withholding of removal and cat claims are based on the same factual predicate a credibility ruling necessarily forecloses relief in each
A.