With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". sale. Later that day Cross was directed to return and seize the rest of defendant’s garbage, which was wrapped in plastic bags. These bags were taken to the police station and searched. In them police found 18 white “bindles,” small pieces of folded paper in which controlled substances are packaged for sale. Some of these bindles contained traces of cocaine and notations indicating that they had contained certain amounts (V2 gram and Vi gram) of cocaine. Based on all (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 820, 105 S.Ct. 92, 83 L.Ed.2d 38 (1984) (denying fourth amendment protection to “trash placed for collection in a public area, in close proximity to a public way, or in an outdoors communal trash container serving an apartment building”); State v. Dreyer, 345 N.W.2d 249 (Minn.1984) (<HOLDING>); and State v. Oquist, 327 N.W.2d 587

A: holding that a warrantless search of garbage located within the curtilage of the defendants home violated his fourth amendment rights
B: holding that defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of plastic bags placed in or near his open garbage cans and that the police did not violate his fourth amendment rights in seizing and searching the bags where they were able to do so without trespassing on the defendants property
C: holding that police did not violate defendants fourth amendment rights in seizing and searching three plastic bags full of garbage which defendant had put out for collection at the curb at the edge of his driveway
D: holding that there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of plastic garbage bags left on or at the side of a public street
C.