With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". summary judgment evidence. Dolcefino v. Randolph, 19 S.W.3d 906, 930 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied). As discussed above, Reynolds’s assertion of ownership of the account on behalf of Citibank was sufficient to conclusively establish such ownership in the absence of controverting evidence. See Grant-Brooks, 2003 WL 203481, at *2; Farley, 895 S.W.2d at 428; Hou-Tex Printers, 862 S.W.2d at 191. Reynolds explains in the affidavit that her statements were based on her own personal knowledge as custodian of records for Citibank and CCSI and review of relevant business records that she had access to by virtue of her employment position. See Grant-Brooks, 2003 WL 203481, at *2; see also Ortega v. Cach, LLC, 396 S.W.3d 622, 627-28 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); 8920 Corp. v. Alief Alamo Bank, 722 S.W.2d

A: holding that records relating to a student court were not education records
B: holding that the fdic is entitled to rely exclusively on the account records of the failed institution and that while ownership under state law is one prerequisite for insurance coverage the deposit account records are controlling
C: holding trial court erred in finding violations based only on officers testimony based on review of probation records where states failure to admit records into evidence rendered officers testimony hearsay
D: holding affidavit statements by custodian of records based upon review of companys business records contained sufficient evidence of ownership of account
D.