With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". on CRiminal Justice, Bill Analysis, Tex. S.B. 674, 75th Leg., R.S. (1997). In 1997, the legislature amended the child pornography statute to eliminate a loophole in the existing statute that impeded prosecution of individuals for possession or promotion of child pornography depicted or distributed by computer. Id.; House Comm, on CRiminal JURISPRUDENCE, Bill Analysis, Tex. S.B. 674, 75th Leg., R.S. (1997). There is nothing in these materials to suggest that the legislature intended to prohibit anything other than pornography depicting actual children. Therefore, we conclude that the Texas child pornography statute prohibits only the possession of visual materials depicting real children. Because the Texas statute only prohibits pornography depicting actual children, the sta App.1991) (<HOLDING>). Appellant also contends that the statute is

A: holding twentyeight charges against defendant for possession of child pornography were not multiplicious
B: holding that an overbreadth challenge to a child pornography law was rendered moot by amendment to the statute
C: holding that private possession of child pornography is not protected by the first amendment
D: holding that possession of marijuana is not protected by the free exercise clause of the first amendment
C.