With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". her at the time of the incident that formed the basis of the case. I believed it was Brandy Bowen, it may have been Lisa Cooper, I don’t know exactly. I cannot recall who it was. Whoever I interviewed I felt would not support his hope that she was going to come in to testify that he was — he had some alibi. Post-Conviction Transcript at 46^47. In its order, the post-conviction court found that Bowen “lack[ed] that necessary element of credibility” and that the “failure of [trial counsel] to call Brandy Bowen Murphy as a witness did not prevent Per-ryman from his right to fair trial because of Brandy Bowen’s lack of credibility.” Appellant’s Appendix at 313. We are not in a position to question the post-conviction court’s assessment of witness credibility. See Fisher, 810 N.E.2d at 679 (<HOLDING>). We cannot say that reversal is warranted on

A: holding that the applicable rule of procedure vests a successor judge with judicial discretion to review the jury verdict on a motion for new trial on the ground that such verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence where the record clearly discloses that no question of the credibility of the witnesses or the weight to be given to their testimony will require resolution by him
B: holding that it is function of trial court to judge witnesses credibility and to weigh conflicting evidence
C: holding trial court is sole and exclusive judge of witnesses credibility
D: holding that the postconviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses
D.