With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". discharged into any waters, including ground waters.” See 42 U.S.C. §§ 6903(3); 9601(29). As discussed in Section B of this opinion, PERC, a hazardous waste, did leak into the ground of the facility at issue and entered the environment. Therefore, there has been a "disposal” as defined by the statute. 95 . Defs.’ Post-Trial Br. at 6 (Docket No. 326) (citing Rubin v. United States, 449 U.S. 424, 430, 101 S.Ct. 698, 66 L.Ed.2d 633 (1981)). 96 . See, e.g., Gen. Battery, 423 F.3d at 298 (quoting Exxon Corp g proof of personal ownership or physical possession as a precondition for liability frustrates CERC-LA's broad remedial purposes); United States v. Union Corp., 259 F.Supp.2d 356, 393 (E.D.Pa.2003) (citing Aceto); United States v. Mottolo, 629 F.Supp. 56, 60 (D.N.H.1984) ("Mottolo I") (<HOLDING>); R.R. Street II., 166 S.W.3d at 242 (citing

A: holding that a requirement that the defendant not use or possess alcoholic beverages should not have been imposed as a special condition of probation
B: holding that section 107a3 clearly states that arrangers need not own or possess the waste
C: holding without discussion that a cercla arranger must own or possess the hazardous substance at issue
D: holding that congress did not authorize the states to enforce federal law where it gave states regulatory control through enforcement of their own laws
B.