With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the third party aider-and-abettor cannot be liable to the debtor. Id. at 120; see also In re Bennett Funding Group, Inc., 336 F.3d 94, 100 (2d Cir.2003); Mediators, 105 F.3d at 827 (“[WJhere the principal and agent are one and the same,” if the agent is alleged to have stripped the corporation of assets, it is presumed that the principal, who is the same individual merely wearing a different hat, had knowledge of the actions.). It has accordingly been determined in this circuit that a bankruptcy trustee or creditors’ committee acting on behalf of a debtor corporation lacks standing to assert actions against alleged third-party aider- and-abetters when the sole shareholder of the debtor corporation is alleged to have perpetrated the fraud. See Hirsch, 72 F.3d 1085, 1094 (2d Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); Wagoner, 944 F.2d at 119-20 (holding that a

A: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue
B: holding under connecticut law a bankruptcy trustee lacked standing to sue an accounting firm hired by the debtor in connection the debt ors real estate ponzi scheme
C: holding that shareholders of debtor corporation lacked appellate standing to appeal bankruptcy courts order awarding insurance proceeds to trustee
D: holding that a trustee lacked standing to sue a third party for damages incurred by debenture holders of the corporate debtor
B.