With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". U.S.C. §§ 157(a)/ (b)(2)(I) and 1334. The Plaintiff brings his Complaint to Determine Dischargeability pursuant to the exception to discharge set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). Under this section, a debt will be excepted from the scope of a bankruptcy discharge if it arises as the result of a “willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity.” As applied to this language, there exist two key requirements: “willful” and “malicious” conduct, both types of which, by the statute’s utilization of the conjunctive term “and,” must be in existence before there may be a finding of nondischargeability. Gonzalez v. Moffitt, 254 B.R. 389, 395-96 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio.2000), citing Markowitz v. Campbell (In re Markowitz), 190 F.3d 455, 463 (6th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). It is also follows from the statute’s

A: holding that a debt arising from a medical malpractice judgment which was attributable to a doctors negligent or reckless conduct did not fall within the willful and malicious injury exception to discharge
B: holding  525 applies only where debt dischargeable
C: holding that when a state court judgment was found not to be dischargeable under 11 usc  523a6 the associated attorneys fees were also not dischargeable
D: holding that if both willful and malicious are not met the debt is dischargeable
D.