With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. In the instant case, Stephen Allison’s purported appeal of an order requiring DNA testing in a paternity action has been redesignated as a petition for writ of cer-tiorari. See State, Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Chambers v. Travis, 971 So.2d 157, 159 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (<HOLDING>). We find that the order in this case departs

A: holding that 18a mrs  l302b provides the court with authority to order dna testing when there exists good cause or sufficient reason
B: recognizing that an order for dna testing could cause irreparable harm because the test is intrusive and any error in improperly ordering genetic testing cannot be remedied on appeal after the testing is done and the results are released
C: holding a written order is required for an appeal from a convicting courts ruling on a postconviction motion for dna testing
D: holding that the defendant embarked on a fishing expedition for genetic material whose  potential relevance is pure conjecture and that the defendant could not obtain dna testing based on the speculative allegations in his motion
B.