With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to join in the motion of defendants Crozer-Chester Medical Center and Joan K. Richards to dismiss the complaint (docket entry #13) is GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED; 6. The petition of defendant James E. Clark to join in the motion of defendant Richard Malamut to dismiss the complaint (docket entry # 14) is GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED; 7. The motion of defendants Sat P. Arora and Alan Barman to extend the time to join the motions of co-defendants (docket entry #16) is DENIED AS MOOT; and 8. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case statistically. 2 . The defendants in this matter are Crozer-Chester Medical Center, a Pennsylvania not-for-profit hospital in Upland, Pennsylvania, five doctors at Crozer-Chester (Sat P. Arora, M.D., James E. Clark, M.D., Phyllis A. Shapiro, M.D., Ala 2764, 73 L.Ed.2d 418 (1982) (<HOLDING>); Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U.S. 991, 102 S.Ct.

A: holding that a state application for relief had not been properly filed because it was not accompanied by an oath as required by state law
B: holding that a school was not a state actor even though it had to comply with many state regulations to be eligible for state funding and almost all of its students had been referred to it by the state
C: holding that a privately owned nursing home that received ninety percent of its funding from the state and was subject to significant state regulation was nevertheless not a state actor
D: holding that a state agency created under state law was a state actor
B.