With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or otherwise rendered practically incapable of maritime transport.” 543 U.S. at 496, 125 S.Ct. at 1128. The Court stated that in determining whether a watercraft constitutes a “vessel” under § 3, “[t]he question remains in all cases whether the watercraft’s use ‘as a means of transportation on water’ is a practical possibility or merely a theoretical one.” Id. (citation omitted). The district court relied on Stewart for the proposition that a watercraft taken out of navigation is no longer a vessel. Stewart does mention that a ship’s navigational status is “relevant” to whether it is practically capable of transportation on water. 543 U.S. at 496, 125 S.Ct. at 1128. The Court does not, however, require that a ship be “in navigation” to be considered a “vessel” for purposes of 1 U 3 (<HOLDING>). In fact, it is instructive that, in addition

A: holding that a houseboat is a vessel capable of being subject to a maritime lien as the fact that she has no motive power and must  be towed does not deprive her of the status of a vessel
B: holding that a ship whose powers of selfnavigation were practically irreparable and that was towed to a repair facility to be converted into an artificial reef was a vessel subject to maritime liens because it could be towed and carry a crew and cargo
C: holding that an assault on a seaman by his former maritime employer aboard a vessel in navigable waters had the potential to disrupt maritime commerce because it ren dered the seaman unable to fish
D: recognizing equitable powers necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title
B.