With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the order. III. CONCLUSION We AFFIRM the superior court’s order setting aside the original decree of dissolution. We VACATE the amended decree of divorce and the property division order incorporated therein. We AFFIRM the award of full attorney’s fees to Ms. Song for defending against Mr. Song’s motion to set aside the Rule 60(b) order. We VACATE the award of partial attorney’s fees to Ms. Song-under Rule 82(b)(1) for prevailing on her request to modify the property division. We REMAND this case for further proceedings as directed in this opinion. 1 . See Lowe v. Lowe, 817 P.2d 453, 456 (Alaska 1991). 2 . Alaska R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3). 3 . Alaska R. Civ. P. 60(b). 4 . Id. 5 . 915 P.2d 1222 (Alaska 1996). 6 . Id. at 1224. 7 . Cf. Schofield v. Schofield, 111 P.2d 197, 202 (Alaska 1989) (<HOLDING>); Alaska Placer Co. v. Lee, 502 P.2d 128, 131

A: holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding violation was willful and substantial
B: holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to extend time for service of process under rule 4m
C: holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that a tenmonth delay in filing a dismissal motion was reasonable
D: holding that superior court did not abuse its discretion in finding that rule 60b6 motion was made within a reasonable time
D.