With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". with the Prairie Band Potawatomi Tribe, no such agreement had been reached at the time Stephan executed the search warrants. Furthermore, the governor did not announce the Kickapoo tribe compact until July 2, 1991 — two weeks after Stephan participated in the search at Kaul’s store— and apparently excluded Stephan from the negotiations leading to the agreement. Therefore, Kaul has presented no evidence from which we can conclude that the governor ordered Stephan not to enforce the Kansas tax statutes against Indian retailers on the Reservation at the time the search warrants were executed. Because Kaul has failed to prove that K.S.A. § 79-3615(g) and K.S.A. § 79-3321(a) exempt Indian retailers, Stephan did not violate Kaul’s Fourth Amendment rights by applying for the Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). Kaul argues that despite the Kansas Act’s

A: holding that the state has no jurisdiction to pursue an indian onto an indian reservation for criminal offenses committed off the reservation
B: holding that county law enforcement officers lacked jurisdiction to arrest indian at ballpark located on indian trust land
C: holding that state has no jurisdiction over civil suit by nonindian against indian where cause of action arises on indian reservation
D: holding that oklahoma police officer was without jurisdiction to arrest indian inside indian reservation when the state has neither received by express grant nor acted pursuant to congressional authorization to assume criminal jurisdiction over indian country
D.