With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". matter, then, the Appellate Division’s decision rests on an interpretation of the Federal Rules, which requires us to conduct plenary review. See L-3 Commc’ns Corp. v. OSI Sys., Inc., 607 F.3d 24, 27-28 (2d Cir. 2010) (plenary standard of review applies to “a district court’s interpretation of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure”); In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 221 F.3d 449, 459 (3d Cir. 2000) (same, regarding the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Miller, 624 F.2d at 1200-02 (exercising plenary review over a district court’s interpretation of one of its local rules insofar as the rule simply incorporated state law, interpretations of which are subject to plenary review); cf. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broad. Co., 433 U.S. 562, 568, 97 S. Ct. 2849, 53 L. Ed. 2d 965 (1977) (<HOLDING>). IV. Discussion The Appellate Division

A: holding that the supreme court may review statecourt judgments that rest on state law when the state court felt compelled by what it understood to be federal constitutional considerations to construe and apply its own law in the manner it did
B: holding that a federal court in absence of a state supreme court pronouncement on a subject of state substantive law must determine as best it can what the highest court of the state would decide
C: holding that when presented with petitioners claim based upon state and federal law and the state court confined its analysis  to state law aedpa deference does not apply
D: holding that failure to cite federal law does not mean that state court decision was contrary to established federal law state court need not even be aware of supreme court precedents so long as neither the reasoning nor the result of the statecourt decision contradicts them
A.