With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Regardless of whether or not a signed copy of the arbitration agreement may be necessary to make an arbitration clause enforceable, unsigned agreements are not automatically sufficient to compel arbitration without some proof that a party agreed to arbitration. Here, the problem with the purported agreement to arbitrate is much bigger than whether or not it was signed — -there is no evidence that Easterling was a card member or a party to the agreement to arbitrate. Thus, the principal holding from West applies: courts will enforce arbitration clauses only upon the actual parties to the arbitration agreement. See West; Benjamin at ¶ 33; Teramar Corp. at 41, 531 N.E.2d 721; cf. Midland Funding NCC-2 Corp. v. Johnson, 5th Dist. No. 07 CA 29, 2008-Ohio-3900, 2008 WL 2954286, ¶ 15, 16 (<HOLDING>). {¶ 13} Having found that Worldwide failed to

A: holding that a sentencer must not be precluded from considering  any of the circumstances of the offense that the defendant proffers
B: holding that the district court must strictly comply with rule 11 so that it can be determined whether the plea is knowingly and voluntarily entered
C: holding that a creditcard issuers failure to strictly comply with rc 271114 precluded the trial court from considering the application for enforcement of the award
D: holding that an appellants failure to strictly comply with parap 1925a2 did not warrant an application of the waiver rule as no court order had been violated and there was no prejudice to any party
C.