With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". strike defendant's arguments in this regard. Plaintiff's motion to strike is denied. 5 . The asserted independent claims are 30, 102, 317, 414 and the asserted dependent claims are 31, 34, 106, 122, 324, 343, 416, and 422. 6 . Defendant provides similar comparisons for independent claims 102, 317, and 414. (D.I. 139 at 16-21) 7 . Plaintiff advances the same argument, i.e., that the claims use- "special purpose computers,” to assert that the claims are "tied to a particular machine or apparatus,” and satisfy the first prong of the machine-or-transformation test. Using the same analysis, the court disagrees. 8 . The preemption inquiry focuses on whether the patent “would risk disproportionately ty ing up the use of the underlying ideas.” Alice, 134 S.Ct. at 2354; Mayo, 132 S.Ct. at 1294 (<HOLDING>); Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., Civ. No.

A: holding that because a valid arbitration clause existed the parties had to arbitrate all disputes when the subject matter of the dispute has a reasonable relationship to the subject matter of the contract
B: holding that the complaint placed the defendant on notice when it alleged ownership of the asserted patent named the individual defendants cited the patents that are allegedly infringed described the means by which the defendants allegedly infringed the patents and pointed to specific sections of the patent law invoked
C: holding that patents that would  disproportionately tie up the use of the underlying natural laws are invalid for lacking patentable subject matter
D: recognizing that in patent infringement eases a finding of noninfringement prevents a court from reaching an affirmative defense asserting the patents invalidity because the validity issue becomes immaterial to the disposition of the case and that any determination of the patents validity by the district court in such a case should be vacated
C.