With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to which he is entitled on those claims. 2. Allstate’s Suggestion That We Should Direct the District Court to Enter Judgment on Pacleb’s Individual Claims, as an Attempt to Moot the Action, Is Contrary to Campbell-Ewald, Which Affords a Would-be Class Representative with a Live Claim a Fair Opportunity to Show Certification Is Warranted The question remains whether we should, as Allstate urges, instruct the district court to order monetary and injunctive relief on Paeleb’s individual claims, thereby mooting them, before Pacleb has had an opportunity to move for class certification. We assume, without deciding, a court has authority in an appropriate case to enter judgment for complete relief on a plaintiffs individual claims over the plaintiffs objection. Cf. Diaz, 732 F.3d at 955 (<HOLDING>). Even if that is true, however, Campbell-Ewald

A: recognizing that the declaratory judgment act is only procedural and does not create substantive rights internal quotation marks and citations omitted
B: recognizing a court may have discretion to halt a lawsuit  or as relevant here particular claims  by entering judgment for the plaintiff when the defendant unconditionally surrenders and only the plaintiffs obstinacy or madness prevents her from accepting total victory quoting genesis healthcare 133 sct at 1536 kagan j dissenting internal quotation marks omitted
C: recognizing that we review a trial courts jury instruc tions for abuse of discretion and that a district court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law internal quotation marks omitted
D: holding that an expert may base his or her opinions and inferences on facts andor data perceived by or made known to the expert at or before the hearing internal quotation marks omitted
B.