With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". or therapist-client relationship, regardless of whether it occurs during any treatment, consultation, interview or examination, is guilty of a Class F felony. Consent is not an issue in an action under this subsection. Section 940.22(2). ¶ 9. To obtain a conviction for a violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.22(2), the State must prove three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that the defendant was or held himself or herself out to be a therapist; (2) that the defendant had intentional sexual contact with a patient or client; and (3) that the sexual contact occurred during an ongoing therapist-patient or therapist-client relationship. State v. Miller, 2002 WI App 197, ¶ 17 n.5, 257 Wis. 2d 124, 650 N.W.2d 850; see also State v. Ambrose, 196 Wis. 2d 768, 777, 540 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1995) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 10. DeLain contends there was not

A: holding that the actor and the complainant must be engaged in a professional therapistpatientclient relationship
B: holding the state must prove that at the time of the homicide the defendant was engaged in the commission of the felony
C: holding that before a duty can be imposed there must be a relationship between the parties and the harm must have been foreseeable
D: holding that the special relationship exception does not apply to the relationship between a student and a school
A.