With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 12(b). State v. Perreault, 2002 ND 14, ¶ 7, 638 N.W.2d 541. The purpose of the motion is to test the sufficiency of the information. Id. Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2), a motion to dismiss raising a “defense, objection, or request that the court can determine without a trial of the general issue” may be raised before trial. [¶ 13] Here, although the trial court issued its scheduling order requesting all motions be submitted by March 16, 2012, and Stegall moved to dismiss the information on August 16, 2012, challenging its sufficiency, we conclude it was within the trial court’s discretion to extend its own deadlines before trial. Ill [¶ 14] The dispositive issue before this Court is whether the offense of endangerment of a child, N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-22.2, applies when a pr 94) (<HOLDING>); State v. Dunn, 82 Wash.App. 122, 916 P.2d 952

A: holding that a woman possessed immunity from criminal prosecution for causing injury or death to her fetus
B: holding a fetus is not a child person or individual for purposes of criminal prosecution under the reckless injury to a child statute
C: holding for purposes of establishing the offense of reckless manslaughter against a pregnant woman a fetus is not a person
D: holding an unborn child is not a child for purposes of criminal prosecution of mistreatment of a child
B.