With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Paso 1994, pet. ref'd). Texas Rule of Evidence 103 provides that an objection to “offered” evidence outside the presence of the jury will apply to the evidence when it is admitted before the jury without having to repeat the objection. Tex.R. Evtd. 103. Because only Cabbie’s testimony concerning appellant’s nickname was “offered” outside the presence of the jury, appellant’s objection did not preserve error with regard to the additional testimony about his nickname that was subsequently offered by other witnesses. Moreover, because the subsequent witnesses referred to appellant’s nickname, any error in allowing Cabbie to refer to appellant’s nickname was cured by the unobjected-to testimony of the subsequent witnesses. See Leday v. State, 983 S.W.2d 713, 718 (Tex.Crim.App.1998) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we overrule appellant’s third

A: holding that to preserve an alleged error in the admission of evidence a timely objection must be made to the introduction of the evidence specific grounds for the objection should be stated and a ruling on the objection must be made by the trial court
B: holding that parties waived any choice of law objection by not raising an objection
C: holding that an objection was adequate when the judge cut short the objection and the defendant was not afforded the opportunity to explain his objection fully
D: holding that overruling an objection to evidence will not result in reversal when other such evidence is received without objection
D.