With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ... must accept its results”); Syl. pt. 1, McElhinny v. Minor, 91 W.Va. 755, 114 S.E. 147 (1922) (“appellant cannot complain of errors ... which he alone caused”). Recently in Young v. Young, 194 W.Va. 405, 460 S.E.2d 651 (1995) (per curiam), we held that a circuit court’s remand to the family law master was erroneous because the alleged errors were invited by the complainant’s nonappearance at the proceedings before the family law master. Syl. pt. 21 of State v. Riley, 151 W.Va. 364, 151 S.E.2d 308 (1966) states: A judgment will not be reversed for any error in the record introduced by or invited by the party seeking reversal. In accord Syl. pt. 4 State v. Johnson, 197 W.Va. 575, 476 S.E.2d 522 (1996). See State, Dept. of Health v. Robert Morris N., 195 W.Va. at 766, 466 S.E.2d at 834 (<HOLDING>); Syl. pt. 2, State v. Bowman, 155 W.Va. 562,

A: holding appellate court need not address issues unnecessary to its decision
B: recognizing the need for judicial economy in family issues as well as  the need to avoid fundamental unfairness
C: holding the court need not rule on remaining issues when the disposition of prior issues is dispositive
D: recognizing the need for natural gas supply as a substantial public interest
B.