With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". views by one or more users. No evidence has been presented connecting any of the defendants with the initial production of the image, which the record attributes to the biological father of the victim. As these factors do not show a need to impose a greater award of restitution than those general losses attributable to the conspiracy and the attorneys’ fees related directly to this case, the total losses caused by the KOFD conspiracy are $29,859.15 ($25,078.95 in general losses plus $4,780.20 in attorneys’ fees), or approximately $29,859.00. As this case involves more than one defendant and the offense of conviction is conspiracy, the defendants are jointly and severally liable for this amount. See Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411, 413, 110 S.Ct. 1979, 109 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990) (<HOLDING>). Section 2259 states that “[a]n order of

A: holding that the victim and witness protection act limits the amount of restitution to the loss caused by the specific conduct forming the basis of the offense of conviction
B: holding that the relevant question in imposing restitution under the mvra is whether the loss is caused by the specific conduct that is the basis of the offense of conviction
C: holding that an award of restitution is only for the loss caused by the specific conduct that is the basis of the offense of conviction
D: holding that under the restitution provision of the supervised release statute 18 usc  3583 restitution can be ordered only for losses caused by the specific conduct that is the basis for the offense of conviction
C.