With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". determine that a total ban on machine guns would have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 584, 139 L.Ed.2d 422 (1997), vacated in part on other grounds, 133 F.3d 1412 (11th Cir.1998). A statute regulating noneconomic activity necessarily satisfies Lopez if it inclu d 188 (1997); United States v. Melina, 101 F.3d 567, 573 (8th Cir.1996) (rejecting the contention that the government must show a "substantial effect” to satisfy the interstate commerce requirement under § 844(D). This conclusion also is consistent with decisions of this court construing other statutes with the same relevant language as § 844(i)-namely, the "activity affecting interstate commerce" language. See United States v. Castlebery, 116 F.3d 1384, 1386-87 (11th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); United States v. McAllister, 77 F.3d 387, 390

A: holding in the context of the predecessor statute to  922g that the interstate commerce element is met by demonstrating a minimal nexus
B: holding the limitations to congresss commerce clause authority recognized in lopez have no effect on the establishment of the interstate commerce element of the hobbs act
C: holding after lopez that the interstate nexus element of the hobbs act still requires the government to show only a minimal connection to interstate commerce
D: holding that the government can satisfy the hobbs act interstate commerce requirement by showing that the robbery resulted in the closure of a business engaged in interstate commerce
C.