With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of people who would suffer in the future and could not be presently ascertained. The court further stated that class actions are particulary well suited to determine the rights of such groups. Certification is appropriate here for the same reasons. Also, members of the proposed class lack the financial ability and the knowledge necessary to bring individual actions. The class members are poor; many of them work for less than the minimum wage as migrant farm workers. (Doc. 78 at 6). They have little knowledge of their constitutional rights and may well not know where to go to obtain legal help, even if they could afford it. Thus, plaintiffs’ argument that the issues raised in this case are not easily addressed on a case by case basis is well taken. See Rodriguez, 672 F.Supp. at 1014 (<HOLDING>). If the plaintiffs are not granted class

A: holding a covenant not to sue mooted a counterclaim of trademark invalidity notwithstanding the lack of an admission or finding of liability
B: holding that geographical dispersion poverty lack of sophistication and reluctance to sue individually contribute to the finding that joinder is impracticable
C: holding that lack of justiciable interest resulted in lack of standing to pursue claim and that lack of standing deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to act
D: holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue
B.