With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). 13 . We are unaware of any cases in which a single use of marijuana — or any drug — during pregnancy has, alone, been held sufficient to constitute a "course of conduct” to support termination under subsection (E). Cf. In re M.D.V., No. 14-04-00463-CV, 2005 WL 2787006, at *5 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 27, 2005, no pet.) (mem.op.) (finding appellant engaged in course of conduct that endangered child in light of her extensive drug use for ten years, particularly while pregnant and while caring for her children, her inability or unwillingness to abstain from drug use after child was born marijuana positive, and her relapse after children were returned to her); In re S.M.L.D., 150 S.W.3d 754, 757-58 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2004, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). 14 . The Department does not attempt to argue

A: holding that fundamental error occurred in the prosecution of a mother for aggravated manslaughter of her child when the prosecutor commented on the fact that the mother had contemplated having an abortion during the course of her pregnancy with the child
B: holding that evidence was sufficient to support trial courts best interest finding where mother allowed child to be in contact with individual who had physically abused her mother was not capable of caring for child on her own mother admitted at trial she had not found stable employment and child was doing well in her current placement
C: holding mothers drug use during pregnancy and after child was removed from her care in face of random drug testing that placed her relationship with child at risk was legally and factually sufficient evidence that she engaged in course of conduct which endangered her child
D: holding evidence that mother allowed child to remain in home in which there was violent conduct as evidenced by fathers physical abuse of mother during her pregnancy was factually sufficient to support termination
C.