With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". missed a scheduled coupon payment is not determinative .... NECA was not required to prove the precise amount of any damages at the pleading stage.”). Moreover, plaintiffs assert that although Plumbers’ Fund incurred only a nominal $2,000 loss, Pipefitters’ Fund and NECA-IBEW suffered larger losses. See Pis.’ Surreply at 5-6. 18 . Determining the accuracy of defendants’ contention requires a factual investigation into whether Pipefitters and NECA-IBEW, exercising reasonable diligence, should have "discover[ed] [] the untrue statement” within the year and eleven days that elapsed between the date of the corrective disclosure and the date of the filing of the Complaint. See 15 U.S.C. § 77m; cf. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Reynolds, 559 U.S. 633, 130 S.Ct. 1784, 1796, 176 L.Ed.2d 582 (2010) (<HOLDING>); Young v. Lepone, 305 F.3d 1, 12 (1st

A: holding that facts showing scienter are among those that constitute the violation  and must be discovered for a claim to accrue
B: holding that to be entitled to relief under rule 60b2 the moving party must show among other things that the newly discovered evidence is material
C: holding that the evidence must be sufficient to support the agencys findings of fact and that the agencys inferences from those facts must be reasonable
D: recognizing that when the facts alleged in the administrative complaint are not disputed this leaves only conclusions of law to be drawn as to whether the admitted facts constitute a violation of the statutes as charged and penalties to be imposed
A.