With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". trial on all issues against all defendants in a case having multiple and alternative claims against multiple defendants. Certainly there is nothing about the term trial de novo that suggests such a result. The phrase simply refers to a proceeding that begins anew, not to the range of the issues so tried. Nothing in the structure and purpose of the statute purports to mandate an omnibus trial in a multi-issue, multi-party case where the adverse parties to discrete claims have failed to request a trial after non-binding arbitration.... Each claim by this plaintiff against each separate defendant stands alone and can be treated ... entirely separate from and alternative to the other claims. Id. at 1239-40 (emphasis in original). See also Venetoff v. Papas, 732 So.2d 453 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (<HOLDING>). The request for trial de novo in the present

A: recognizing de novo standard of review
B: holding plaintiffs motion for trial de novo of award in counterclaim only but not of damages awarded in main cause of action was not void and remanding for a trial de novo of both the main cause of action and the counterclaim
C: holding that review of the construction of a sentencing statute is de novo
D: holding that appellant was entitled to a de novo review however he was not entitled to a de novo review of an argument never raised
B.