With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Jose Samuel Letran Ruiz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum, withhold ing of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, see Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir.2003), we deny in part and grant in part the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that changed country conditions in Guatemala undermine Letran Ruiz’s fear of future persecution. See id. at 998-00 (<HOLDING>). Because Letran Ruiz failed to establish

A: holding that the state department country report constituted substantial evidence to support the agencys finding of changed country conditions in guatemala
B: recognizing that a report from the state department is usually the best available source of information on country conditions
C: holding that for purposes of claim 4 another country means a country other than the first and second country explicitly rejecting tpllcs proposed construction
D: holding that 8 cfr  10032c3ii applies to changed country conditions in the country of origin or deportation and not changed personal circumstances in the united states
A.