With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". corporation. See Prison Rehabilitative Indus. & Diversified Enters., Inc. v. Betterson, 648 So.2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Shands Teaching Hosp. & Clinics, Inc. v. Lee, 478 So.2d 77, 79 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The agency must be subject to something more than the sort of control that is exercised by the government in its regulatory capacity. Pagan v. Sarasota County Pub. Hosp. Bd., 884 So.2d 257, 267-68 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing United States v. Orleans, 425 U.S. 807, 96 S.Ct. 1971, 48 L.Ed.2d 390 (1976)). The control that flows from a simple contractual arrangement between the government and a corporate entity ordinarily will not be considered sufficient to establish that the contracting corporate entity is an instrumentality or agency of the state. Id. (citing Mingo, 638 So.2d at 86 (<HOLDING>)). Similarly, the mere fact that a corporation

A: holding that contract defining corporate providers as independent contractors effectively disavows the corporation as a corporation primarily acting as an instrumentality or agency of the state or its subdivisions
B: holding that claims of corporation vest in corporation
C: recognizing that pursuant to the traditional application of the alter ego doctrine corporate form may be disregarded when the corporation is the mere instrumentality or business conduit of another corporation or person
D: holding that an entity majorityowned by an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state is itself an agency or instrumentality of that foreign state under the fsia
A.