With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (11th Cir. 2012). In reviewing for substantive reasonableness, we examine the totality of the circumstances and ask whether the statutory factors set forth in § 3553(a) support the sentence in question. United States v. Gonzalez, 550 F.3d 1319, 1324 (11th Cir. 2008). The weight accorded any particular § 3553(a) factor is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the district court. United States v. Clay, 483 F.3d 739, 743 (11th Cir. 2007). Although we do not presume that a sentence falling within the guideline range is reasonable, we ordinarily expect such a sentence to be reasonable. United States v. Hunt, 526 F.3d 739, 746 (11th Cir. 2008). A sentence imposed well below the statutory maximum penalty also indicates that the sentence is reasonable. See Gonzales, 550 F.3d at 1324 (<HOLDING>). Under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), a court may revoke

A: recognizing a claim that the sentence exceeded the statutory maximum
B: holding that a withinguideline sentence was reasonable in part because it was well below the allowable statutory maximum
C: holding sentences need only be below the statutory maximum
D: holding that a defendants sentence was reasonable in part because it was well below the statutory maximum
B.