With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Therefore, the State argues that by alleging appellant committed aggravated assault, the indictment also alleges appellant committed serious bodily injury, which, according to the above line of cases, would satisfy the notice requirement. While the state’s argument is persuasive, we cannot agree that merely alleging appellant committed “aggravated assault” is equivalent to alleging he caus App.1990) (indicating that death caused by “stabbing with a knife” provides notice). Cases following Beck have held that an indictment alleging “serious bodily injury” is sufficient notice of the state’s intent to seek a deadly weapon finding, if the indictment also alleged the serious bodily injury was caused by some act or instrument. See Ex parte Brown, 773 S.W.2d 332, 333 (Tex.Crim.App.1989) (<HOLDING>); Gilbert v. State, 769 S.W.2d at 536-37

A: recognizing that attempted robbery with a deadly weapon is a second degree felony
B: holding that variance between indictment alleging that defendant threw a knife at the victim and proof that the knife fell out of the defendants hand as he was stabbing the victim was not fatal to conviction for aggravated assault
C: holding that indictment alleging serious bodily injury caused by motor vehicle colliding with a fixed object provides sufficient notice of states intent to seek deadly weapon finding
D: holding that indictment alleging defendant committed attempted murder by stabbing with a knife was proper notice of intent to seek deadly weapon finding
D.