With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to its being refiled. During this period of time, no progress was made toward confirmation of debtor’s Plan, which had been filed on January 12, 1995. On June 9, 1995, the UST filed a motion to establish a deadline by which an Amended Plan would be filed. By Order entered June 13, 1995, the debtor was given twenty days in which to file an Amended Plan. No Amended Plan was ever filed. The UST and Barbara Meyer filed motions to convert the case to Chapter 7 or, alternatively, to dismiss the case for failure to file an Amended Plan. The Court held a hearing on July 14,1995, on said motions. At that time, Mr. Desselle appeared and agreed that a confirmable Plan could not be filed, and he asked the Court to dismiss the case, rather than convert to Chapter 7. Since it appeared R.I.1995) (<HOLDING>); In re Poseidon Pools of America, Inc., 180

A: holding that the detail provided in a fee application is of paramount importance to the courts determination that the requested fees should be allowed
B: holding that fee application must be sufficiently detailed to allow court to make an independent evaluation as to what fees are actual and necessary and finding that failure to keep contemporaneous records does not automatically result in denial of the fees but the lack thereof justifies a reduction of the fee to the level proven
C: holding that the fee applicant bears the burden of showing that  an adjustment is necessary to the determination of a reasonable fee 
D: holding that attorneys fees for the preparation of the fee application are compensable
A.