With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". as broad as that of the United States suing as the tribe’s trustee.” Moe, 425 U.S. at 473, 96 S.Ct. 1634. The Court based its view on the legislative history of § 1362 in which the House Judiciary Committee characterized § 1362 “as providing ‘the means whereby the tribes are assured of the same judicial determination whether the action is brought in their behalf by the Government or by their own attorneys.’” Id. at 472-73, 96 S.Ct. 1634 (quoting H.R.Rep. No.2040 (1966), reprinted in 1966 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3145, 3147). Plainly, sovereign immunity would not have barred the United States acting as the tribe’s trustee from suing Pierce in her official capacity, the equivalent of suing the state itself. See United States v. Mississippi, 380 U.S. 128, 140-41, 85 S.Ct. 808, 13 L.Ed.2d 717 (1965) (<HOLDING>). Reason suggested that neither should

A: holding that the eleventh amendment does not bar the united states from asserting an indemnity claim against a state
B: holding that the eleventh amendment does not bar federal courts from enjoining unconstitutional actions of state officers
C: recognizing the eleventh amendment does not bar the united states from suing a state
D: recognizing two exceptions to eleventh amendment bar
C.