With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". but the law is currently in flux. In 2009, the Maryland Court of Appeals held that the Board of Education of Baltimore County could not assert a defense of sovereign immunity for a claim for $100,000 in an action alleging violations of the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Bd. of Educ. of Baltimore Cnty. v. Zimmer-Rubert, 409 Md. 200, 973 A.2d 233, 242 dressing the question after Zimmer-Rubert have reached varying conclusions. See Lee-Thomas v. Bd. of Educ. of Prince George’s Cnty., Civ. No. CBD-08-3327, 2010 WL 2365673, at *1, *3 (D.Md. June 8, 2010) (relying on Zimmer-Rubert to hold that § 5-518(c) waives Eleventh Amendment immunity to federal claims in federal court); but see Savoy v. Charles Cnty. Pub. Sch., Civ. No. AW-09-788, 2010 WL 481345, at *3 (D.Md. Feb. 5, 2010) (<HOLDING>). This Court is inclined to agree with

A: holding the language of  5518e insufficient as a waiver of eleventh amendment immunity to federal claims in federal court
B: holding that state defendant waived eleventh amendment immunity to a federal claim by removing to federal court
C: holding that the nyshrl does not waive the new yorks eleventh amendment immunity to suit in federal court
D: holding that state did not waive eleventh amendment immunity by removing case to federal court
A.