With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (faulting complaint for highlighting “more than half’ of statements quoted “while simultaneously-conceding that it is not challenging many of the statements it has chosen to highlight”); In re Alcatel Sec. Litig., 382 F.Supp.2d 513, 534 (S.D.N.Y.2005) (faulting complaint for “neglecting] to make it clear what portion of each quotation constitutes a false representation”). The CAC is thus not a complaint that is so “[v]ague and disorganized” as to fail to satisfy Rule 9(b) and the PSLRA. In re ITT Educ. Servs., 859 F.Supp.2d at 578. The Court also acknowledges that, in some respects, Plaintiffs are stuck between the proverbial rock of Rule 8(a) and the proverbial hard place of Rule 9(b) and the PSLRA. See In re Countrywide Fin. Corp. Sec. Litig., 588 F.Supp.2d 1132, 1156 (C.D.Cal.2008) (<HOLDING>). Corzine seeks to take advantage of

A: holding that specific details about time place and substance of the fraud satisfy rule 9b
B: recognizing that navigating and reconciling rule 8a rule 9b and the plsra creates an onerous task for securities fraud plaintiffs
C: holding that rule 9b applies to fca
D: holding that fraud creates an exception to the rule
B.