With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". because: (1) O’Laughlin’s prior contacts with Kotowski were minimal; (2) the facts here “do[] not align” with a robbery motive; (3) the prosecution’s weapon was “merely ‘consistent’” with Kotowski’s injuries; (4) the motive evidence here was “mere conjecture”; (5) O’Laughlin was not caught in a lie and did not flee the scene; and (6) the evidence of consciousness of guilt was “bare conjecture.” O’Laughlin III, 568 F.3d at 306-OS. At most, these examples amount to a disagreement as to the weight particular pieces of evidence should receive and the inferences to be drawn from them. But a state prisoner is not entitled to habeas relief under AEDPA merely because a federal court disagrees with the state court’s assessment of the evidence. See Williams, 529 U.S. at 410, 120 S.Ct. 1495 (<HOLDING>). The state court’s determination must be so

A: recognizing that the determination is an equitable one
B: holding that the writ may not issue merely because a federal court finds that a state courts decision was erroneous or incorrect 
C: holding that it is not
D: recognizing that a state courts determination is not an unreasonable application of law merely because it is erroneous
D.