With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". beyond a reasonable doubt. Wood, 364 F.3d at 716. Crockett and Scott also testified that they had often seen West in possession of one of the firearms recovered during execution of the warrant at 1204 North 13th Street. The evidence further showed that this gun was loaded when police recovered it from under the mattress on which West habitually slept; the mattress was located in the room that both Crockett and Scott identified as West’s and from which Crockett observed Scott obtain a package of crack cocaine on the evening of January 22, 2002. This evidence was sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to conclude that West had possessed the gun “in furtherance of’ his drug crimes. 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); see also United States v. Swafford, 385 F.3d 1026, 1028-29 (6th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Couch, 367 F.3d 557, 561

A: holding sufficient to support conviction under  924c evidence of loaded firearm recovered from defendants room during execution of search warrant for drugs
B: holding that because evidence supporting search warrant was illegally obtained evidence recovered by executing warrant was fruit of the illegal search
C: holding sufficient to support conviction under  924c evidence of loaded assault rifle recovered from location near where defendants drug transactions were known to occur
D: holding that evidence is sufficient for  924c conviction where it shows weapons proximity to drugs and its accessibility
A.