With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". See Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039, 1046, 77 L. Ed. 2d 405, 103 S. Ct. 2830 (1982); Matson, 260 Kan. at 374. An accused may waive Miranda rights by his or her own acts and words in initiating conversation with police. See State v. Strayer, 242 Kan. 618, 625, 750 P.2d 390 (1988). In Strayer, the defendant was arrested and read his Miranda rights. Strayer stated he understood his rights and would not discuss the specifics of the case with police. Strayer then began questioning the officers regarding his apprehension, and, during a lengthy conversation, made incriminating statements. The Strayer court held that Strayer waived his Miranda rights by his “own acts, words, and surrounding circumstances.” 242 Kan. at 625. See also State v. William, 248 Kan. 389, Syl. ¶ 15, 807 P.2d 1292 (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 837 (1991). The

A: holding that a criminal defendant has a sixth amendment right to counsel at trial
B: recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees a defendant the right to counsel and the right to waive counsel
C: holding that the sixth amendment right to counsel embodies the right to effective assistance of counsel
D: holding that when a defendant initiates contact with the police after an assertion of a sixth amendment right to counsel defendant waives that right and his or her statements are admissible
D.