With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to pay. III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM MeCorvey’s convictions and sentences. 1 . The parties stipulated that McCorvey had a prior felony conviction for purposes of the instant § 922(g) charge. Expert testimony established that the firearm and ammunition found in the house traveled in interstate or foreign commerce. 2 . The court denied McCorvey’s motions for post-verdict judgment of acquittal. 3 . McCorvey also challenges the conclusion that the firearm was "in connection with” drug distribution and whether the court plainly erred in imposing a sentence that was sufficient and "a greater sentence should not be necessary.” Upon review, we affirm without further discussion. See United States v. Garcia-Delgado, 184 Fed.Appx. 851 (11th Cir. 2006) (unpublished) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Rhind, 289 F.3d 690, 695

A: holding that probation is not a sentence
B: holding that sentence is reasonable when the district court properly addresses sentencing factors of  3553a
C: holding that the courts statement that the sentence was sufficient and a greater sentence is not necessary did not contradict the requirements of  3553a
D: recognizing as reasonable a sentence that is sufficient but no greater than necessary to comport with the goals of  3553a2
C.