With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter, 803 F.3d at 696 (internal quotation marks omitted). “Regardless of the label given a district court decision, if it appears from the record that the district court has not adjudicated all of the issues in a case, then there is no final order.” Id. In his initial § 2255 motion, Barker challenged his designation as an armed career criminal. The Government moved to dismiss Barker’s motion as untimely. Barker, a federal inmate acting pro se, timely responded to the Government’s motion to dismiss, see Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988) (<HOLDING>), and asserted a new claim regarding the

A: holding that pro se prisoners 28 usc  2254 application deemed filed for limitation purposes when deposited with prison officials for mailing
B: holding that an noa filed by a pro se prisoner is deemed filed on the date that the prisoner delivers it to prison authorities for mailing
C: holding that prisoners notice of appeal deemed filed on date he delivered it to prison officials for mailing to court
D: holding that prisoners legal materials are deemed filed on the date they are deposited with prison officials for mailing
C.