With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the Title Board must then determine whether any re-proposal of the initiative complies with the single subject and clarity requirements; if not, it must refuse to set the titles. B. Initiative # 29’s Multiple Subjects Initiative # 29 repeats the inclusion of three separate and distinct subjects under the term “judicial personnel.” Use of a generic title will not insulate a proposal from compliance with the applicable constitutional and statutory requirements. See, e.g., In re Proposed Petition (Amend Tabor 25), 900 P.2d 121, 125-26- (Colo.1995) (concluding that umbrella of “revenue changes” did not alter the fact that the measure contained two subjects, tax credit and ballot title procedural requirements); In re Proposed Initiative “Public Rights in Waters II”, 898 P.2d at 1080 (<HOLDING>). The Title Board and the proponents of

A: holding substantial completion had occurred because water district took possession of all the lines filled them with water and began using them to serve the customers of the water district
B: holding that any member of the general public can initiate an action to raise issues involving the public trust in air water or other natural resources of the state
C: holding that water conservation district elections and the public trust doctrine were two subjects improperly grouped under the general category of water
D: holding that article x  2 of the california constitution dictates the basic principles defining water rights that no one can have a protectible interest in the unreasonable use of water and that holders of water rights must use water reasonably and beneficially
C.