With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Superintendent of Ins. of N.Y. v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co., 404 U.S. 6, 13 n. 9, 92 S.Ct. 165, 30 L.Ed.2d 128 (1971), 772 (“Though the rule once may have been otherwise, it is settled that there is an implied cause of action only if the underlying statute can be interpreted to disclose the intent to create one. [citations omitted]”), and 773 (“Concerns with the judicial creation of a private cause of action caution against its expansion. The decision to extend the cause of action is for Congress, not for us. Though it remains the law, the § 10(b) private right should not be extended beyond its present boundaries.”). Explaining its heavy reliance on Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A., 511 U.S. 164, 177, 114 S.Ct. 1439, 128 L.Ed.2d 119 (1994) (5-1) (<HOLDING>), also authored by Justice Kennedy, the

A: holding that no private right of action exists
B: recognizing private right of action
C: holding that a private plaintiff is not entitled to maintain an aiding and abetting action under  10b or rule 10b  5
D: holding that a  10b private civil action did not extend to aiders and abettors
D.