With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of parties hoping to participate in or seeking advocacy during the Department’s trade missions. The information included marketing data, financial arrangements, business contacts, contract details, negotiation status, estimates that companies have placed on the value of foreign projects and requests for meetings with foreign contacts that companies have made to DOC. Swiatek 2d. Supp Decl. at 106-12 (listing and briefly describing individual documents, such as “40AK1714, January 11, 1995 — 2 pages. Matrix: Summary of Possible India Advocacy Projects. Redacted: meetings requested, values.”). The parties do not contest that the withheld information is commercial; nor do they dispute that the information was compelled, see Lepelletier v. FDIC, 977 F.Supp. 456, 460 n. 3 (D.D.C.1997) (<HOLDING>). Based on the withheld information being

A: recognizing relevance of information and that need for this information outweighs the burden to appellants
B: holding actual possession of or access to information by the irs is not an absolute bar to enforcement of a summons for that information
C: holding that information required for participation in a voluntary program is information that a party was obliged to furnish
D: holding that once the moving party meets its burden the nonmoving party is obliged to produce evidence in response
C.