With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (concluding evidence of possession was insufficient when the defendant’s companion acknowledged that the weapon belonged to him, and that the defendant did not know it was present). {24} However, we must hold that these additional pieces of evidence, though helpful to a reasonable fact-finder, would not have been enough, by themselves, to prove control. Instead, the ammunition clip tips the balance in favor of the verdict. Unlike the Cou Ct.App.1995) (finding sufficient evidence to support a conviction based on constructive possession when a pistol was found under the passenger seat where the defendant had been seated and fifteen to twenty rounds of ammunition, which matched the pistol, were found in the defendant’s pants pocket); Green v. State, 489 P.2d 768, 768 (Okla.Crim.App.1971) (<HOLDING>). We cite these cases for illustrative purposes

A: holding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that the defendant a front seat passenger of a vehicle occupied by three individuals was in constructive possession of marijuana found in white bag directly under the defendants seat
B: holding conviction for possession was supported by sufficient evidence when a firearm was found under the passenger seat where the defendant had been sitting and the arresting officer observed the defendant trying to place something in the glove compartment which when searched yielded an ammunition clip matching the gun under the seat
C: holding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that the juvenile a front seat passenger of a vehicle occupied by four persons was in possession of marijuana recovered from a crumpled piece of newspaper behind the drivers seat
D: holding direct testimony tying a defendant to a gun was not required when the gun was found in the defendants truck and when the defendant had both ammunition for the gun and a rack in which it could have been kept
B.