With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989), however, the Second Circuit has concluded “individual” does not include a corporate debtor. Maritime Asbestosis Legal Clinic v. LTV Steel Co., Inc. (In re Chateaugay Corp.), 920 F.2d 183, 184-87 (2d Cir.1990). Lower courts are likewise split. Compare, e.g., Mallard Pond Partners v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co. (In re Mallard Pond Partners), 113 B.R. 420, 423 (Bankr.W.D.Tenn.1990) (“[T]he word ‘individual’ is construed to include a partnership (or corporate) debtor.”); Schewe v. Fairview Estates (In re Schewe), 94 B.R. 938, 948 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.1989) (“An ‘individual’ as set forth in § 362(h) may include a corporate entity.”); Tel-A-Communications Consultants, Inc. v. Auto-Use (In re Tel-A-Communications Consultants, Inc.), 50 B.R. 250, 254 (Bankr.D.Conn.1985) (<HOLDING>) with In re MCEG Productions, Inc., 133 B.R.

A: holding that a contract should be read to give reasonable meaning to all provisions of that contract
B: holding  362h should be construed more broadly than its literal language and should be read in conjunction with all of  362
C: holding that the term commerce in the faa is to be broadly construed
D: holding that the fcra must be construed broadly in favor of remediation
B.