With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". more than just the unauthorized interception of signals.” That’s Entertainment v. Centel Videopath, No. 93-CV-1471, 1993 WL 13011588, at *7 (N.D.Ill. Dec. 9, 1993) see also Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. That Place, LLC, No. 11-CV-931, 2012 WL 2525653, at *3 (E.D.Wis. June 29, 2012) (“While the second and fourth sentences of § 605(a) require both an unauthorized ‘interception’ and a divulgence of the transmission in order to establish liability under the Act, the first and third sentences of § 605(a) do not similarly require an ‘interception’ and simply proscribe the unauthorized divulgence or use of communications which have been ‘received’ legally for certain purposes.”); J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. 4326 Kurz, Ltd., No. 07-CV-3850, 2009 WL 1886124, at *7 (E.D. Pa. June 30, 2009) (<HOLDING>); Kingvision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. Williams, 1

A: holding that an initial communication within the meaning of the fdcpa includes the initiation of a lawsuit
B: holding that section 605a prohibits divulging transmission of a satellite communication to unauthorized persons even after lawfully receiving the communication
C: holding states are not persons for the purposes of section 1983
D: holding that by using a very specific meaning of the words oral communication the legislature limited the reach of a statutory suppression remedy
B.