With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". from other jurisdictions have held that a municipality may not use parkland for a public highway. See Village of Riverside v. MacLain, 210 Ill. 308, 323-24, 71 N.E. 408 (1904) (village’s contention that proposed roadway through park would be a “pleasure driveway” was unsupported by evidence; injunction of construction affirmed on basis that the extension of roadway through the park “will be a perversion of the use, for which the premises . . . were originally dedicated”); City of St. Louis v. Bedal, 394 S.W.2d 391, 397 (Mo. 1965) (while proposed roadway would in some ways enhance use of park, it was still a diversion from park uses; “The park was not created for surface traffic.”); and see City of Hermosa Beach v. Superior Court, 231 Cal. App. 2d 295, 297, 41 Cal. Rptr. 796 (1964) (<HOLDING>). ¶46 The fact that the Fred Meyer Parties

A: holding that public use of a beach was presumed to have originated by permission and to have continued as a license until some act  of the public or public official asserted the use to be exercised as a matter of right rather than privilege
B: recognizing taxpayers standing to challenge construction of road across beach property deeded to city as a public pleasure ground
C: holding that the city had standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute allowing certain communities within the same county as the city to incorporate as towns without the citys consent
D: holding that the venice beach boardwalk is a traditional public forum
B.