With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve Dillard as explained below. Petitioner Sherod Dillard was sentenced to six months’ community control and five years’ probation for crimes that took place in May 1992. He violated probation in 1993 and was resentenced to four years’ imprisonment and two years’ community control. While on community control in December 1994, he and two friends robbed a Long John Silver’s restaurant. The trial court at sentencing for both the new crimes and the violation of community control used two separate scoresheets (i.e., one for the 1992 offenses and one for the 1994 offenses), and imposed two consecutive guidelines sentences. The district court affirmed, and this Court granted review based on conflict with State v. Tito, 616 So.2d 39 (Fla. 1993) (<HOLDING>). Dillard contends that the trial court erred

A: holding special conditions of probation must be imposed at sentencing and may not be imposed at resentencing
B: holding that a single seoresheet must be used in the final stage of resentencing following probation violation
C: holding that resentencing is required
D: holding probation revocation is not a stage of a criminal prosecution
B.