With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". n.w.h.) ("Bouillion does state that aggrieved persons can assert direct claims for equitable relief against governmental entities for violations of the provisions of the Texas Bill of Rights.”) (Emphasis added); Harris County v. Going, 896 S.W.2d 305, 308-09 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist. (5th Cir.1998); and Eugene, 65 F.3d at 1304-05. 149 . City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 389, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989); Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483, 106 S.Ct. 1292, 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986) (plurality); Gonzalez v. Ysleta ISD, 996 F.2d 745, 752-60 (5th Cir.1993); Colle v. Brazos County, 981 F.2d at 245; and Rhyne v. Henderson County, 973 F.2d 386, 392 (5th Cir.1992). 150 . See Holmes, 162 F.3d at 377; and Sharp v. City of Houston, 164 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). 151 . 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d

A: holding that evidence established a municipal custom within the police department of a code of silence regarding sexual harassment of female officers and of retaliation against female officers who complained about same
B: holding that the pittsburgh police department did not illegally terminate an officers hla benefits and that the police department was entitled to a subrogation interest against the officers thirdparty settlement
C: holding that a class of all high school female athletes could not be certified  even if the alleged conduct of the defendant school system was discriminatory  when some female athletes did not share the same goals or interests as the named female plaintiffs because those unnamed female athletes were satisfied with andor benefitted from the alleged discriminatory treatment
D: holding that a sexual assault on a female employee was of a personal nature and not directed against the employee as part of the employment relationship
A.