With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". of these three ways, without permission of the copyright owner, constitutes actionable copyright infringement. Starware Publishing Corp., 900 F.Supp. at 438-39; Frena, 839 F.Supp. at 1555-56; Worlds of Wonder, 658 F.Supp. at 354; 17 U.S.C. § 501(a). In this case, PEI has established by a preponderance of the evidence that Webbworld violated all three of these rights. First, Webbworld “reproduced” unauthorized copies of copyrighted PEI images. On each of the twelve Webbworld web server computers and for each of the images at issue, Webbworld created two thumbnail copies and also reproduced a full-sized image downloaded from the' newsgroup. See MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511, 519 (9th Cir.1993), cert. dism’d, 510 U.S. 1033, 114 S.Ct. 671, 126 L.Ed.2d 640 (1994) (<HOLDING>). Second, Webbworld “distributed” PEI’s

A: holding a procedure for molding rubber that included a computer program is within patentable subject matter
B: holding that reasonable access includes general facility access without notice and patient access with twentyfour hour notice
C: holding that public library was immune from suit under section 230 because it provided an interactive computer service by enabling multiple users to access the internet through its public computers
D: holding that copying occurs when a computer program is transferred from a permanent storage device to a computers random access memory
D.