With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Fifth, grants a federal reserve bank the power to “dismiss” any of its officers, among others, “at pleasure” by its board of directors: holding to the effect that section 341, Fifth, has been impliedly amended by Title VII); Moodie v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 835 F.Supp. 751, 752-753 (consistent with such a holding); Moodie v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 831 F.Supp. 333, 337 (same); ly amended by Title VII and the ADEA, effectively establishes a maximum level of protection for officers of a national bank that FEHA may not exceed, we assume for present purposes that the provision has not been impliedly amended or repealed by other federal law. See post, footnote 8 on page 176. 6 See Booth v. Old Nat. Bank, supra, 900 F.Supp. at pages 842-843 (<HOLDING>); Sargent v. Central Nat. Bank & Trust Co.,

A: holding outside of the context of title vii or the adea that section 24 fifth preempts state law to the extent but only to the extent that it conflicts
B: holding outside of the context of title vii or the adea to the effect that section 341 fifth preempts conflicting state law
C: holding that a state election law is preempted only to the extent that it conflicts with federal law
D: holding to the effect that section 341 fifth as impliedly amended by title vii preempts state law to the extent but only to the extent that it conflicts
A.