With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". use of property that forms the basis of the underlying forfeiture action, the Court agrees with Harborside that when a CSA violation is alleged, only the Government qualifies as a proper movant for purposes of Rule G(7)(a). As indicated above, the starting point for this analysis is § 882 of the CSA, which authorizes district courts to enjoin violations of the CSA consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thus, Rule G cannot be read in isolation; rather, the CSA provides the parameters for any requested relief as long as it is consistent with the Federal Rules, As Harborside points out, courts have consistently held that there is n o Rule G(7)(a) to stop alleged violations of the CSA would thus give them power not intended under the CSA. See Jones, 745 F.Supp.2d at 892 (<HOLDING>). Concourse and Ms. Chretien’s only response is

A: holding that it may be decided as a matter of law
B: recognizing that when  congress has decided not to provide a particular federal remedy we are not free to supplement that decision in a way that makes it meaningless
C: holding that  1983 does not provide a remedy if there is no violation of federal law
D: recognizing that under the act states are granted federal funds to provide disabled children with a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment
B.