With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". be met, but a claimant must specifically plead compliance with these requirements. Failure to do so is fatal. Suits brought in Wyoming courts are routinely dismissed for want of jurisdiction if a claimant either fails to meet all conditions precedent or fails to plead compliance. Ellen Garman, as next friend and guardian of Apryl Garman, brought this diversity action in federal court against the Campbell County School District No. 1 (“the School District”), a governmental entity, asserting a state law claim for negligence and negligent supervision. She failed to satisfy the special pleading requirement. The district court dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as any Wyoming court would be required to do. See Beaulieu v. Florquist, 86 P.3d 863, 866-69 (Wyo.2004) (<HOLDING>). Garman appeals from that dismissal,

A: holding that the court had discretion to allow substitution of plaintiffs to satisfy diversity jurisdiction requirements in order to give the court jurisdiction where no jurisdiction existed when the complaint was filed
B: holding that the plaintiffs claims arose from a certain contract because the subject matter of the plaintiffs suit was intertwined with requirements referred to in the contract
C: holding a plaintiffs complaint must allege compliance with the signature and certification requirements of the wyoming constitution in order to invoke the courts subject matter jurisdiction
D: holding the exclusion did not violate the equal protection clause of the wyoming constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution
C.