With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". so severe as to alter plaintiffs working conditions. Plaintiffs deposition testimony and other evidence in the record indicates that his working environment prior to this incident was generally amicable. See Def.’s Mot., Ex. A, Jones Dep. at 52 (stating that the emp ances, including the plaintiffs and Mr. Wallace’s working relationship over the prior two years, plaintiffs failure to ever voice any complaints to management that Mr. Wallace’s behavior allegedly made plaintiff uncomfortable, and the fact that the conditions of plaintiffs working environment were not altered, there being nothing in the record indicating that prior to or after this incident plaintiff was unable to perform efficiently in his work environment due to Mr. Wallace’s conduct, see Lee-Crespo, 354 F.3d 34, 45-46 (<HOLDING>), the Court grants summary judgment to the

A: holding single incident of sexual harassment was neither sufficiently pervasive nor severe to constitute a hostile work environment
B: holding that a claim of constructive discharge requires a showing of harassment that is more severe and pervasive than that required to show a hostile work environment
C: holding that plaintiff did not establish a severe or pervasive hostile work environment where the complained of conduct was episodic but not so frequent as to become pervasive was never severe was never physically threatening though occasionally discomforting or mildly humiliating and significantly was never according to the record an impediment to the plaintiffs work performance
D: holding that harassing conduct not sufficiently severe and pervasive where conduct would not have affected the work environment of a reasonable person
C.