With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". were violated, nor that the trial court properly granted his motion to dismiss on constitutional grounds. I. Criminal Rule 4(C) I differ from the majority regarding its attribution of several periods of time to the Rule 4(C) clock rather than to Larkin. First, white I fully agree with the majority’s analysis that the time in which the interlocutory appeal for Larkin I was pending was attributable to Larkin, I conclude that time did not expire until the clerk of this court certified our decision as final on November 20, 2015. Indiana Appellate Rule 65(E) states in part: The -Clerk, shall certify the opinion. or memorandum decision to the trial, court or Administrative Agency only after the time for. all Petitions for Rehearing, Transfer,, or Review .has expired,, unl nd. Ct. App, 2003) (<HOLDING>). I concede that our supreme court in recent

A: holding that appeal from a decision of the attorney general denying legal representation was before the appellate division as of right to review the final decision of a state officer
B: holding trial courts action in resentencing defendant following remand on appeal before appellate decision was certified as final was premature and should be considered as a nullity
C: holding that issue of costs and fees to be imposed based on wrongful issuance of injunction was not ripe until appellate decision was certified as final
D: holding that on direct appeal appellate court may remand for resentencing of all counts
B.