With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974) (specifically referring to nonconstitutional standard). 31 . See, e.g.: D.C.Cir.: United States v. Clark, 337 U.S.App. D.C. 278, 184 F.3d 858, 869 (1999) (citing case establishing standard for non-constitutional error); 1st Cir.: United States v. Legarda, 17 F.3d 496, 498-99 (citing Kotteakos and Fed. R.Crim.P. 52(a) for review of erroneous exclusion of hearsay; "defendant was allowed to put on a defense, even if not q L.Ed.2d 628 (1992); United States v. Webster, 750 F.2d 307, 330-31 (1984) (noting that court has in the past used both constitutional and non-constitutional standards, court held exclusion of hearsay to be harmless error), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1106, 105 S.Ct. 2340, 85 L.Ed.2d 855 (1985); 6th Cir.: United States v. Branham, 97 F.3d 835 (1996) (<HOLDING>); 7th Cir.: United States v. Norwood, 798 F.2d

A: holding that erroneous admission of hearsay medical notes was harmless error when doctor testified and was subject to crossexamination
B: holding that a violation of the hearsay rule was harmless
C: holding erroneous exclusion of hearsay did not deny defendant a substantial right
D: holding erroneous exclusion of hearsay harmless under fedrcrimp 52a
D.