With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court. Marathon did not address and, therefore, did not say that only Article III judges could resolve claims against a bankrupt estate. Accordingly, it ought to be clear that 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and the other corresponding provisions were not passed to satisfy Marathon. The 1984 amendments were enacted to resolve a number of “problems” aside from the jurisdictional crisis created by Marathon some two years earlier. Recall: Consumer creditors lobbied to tighten the screws on consumer debtors. Result: The' Consumer Credit Amendments, which included a potpourri of minor and not-so-minor impositions on consumer debtors. Recall: labor unions lobbied to overturn the Supreme Court’s then recent decision in NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513, 104 S.Ct. 1188, 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1984) (<HOLDING>). Result: 11 U.S.C. § 1113. Finally, recall:

A: holding that a debtorinpossession could reject a collective bargaining agreement
B: holding terms of collective bargaining agreement only a factor in weighing reasonableness of accommodation
C: holding that antidiscrimination rights under title vii cannot be waived by a collective bargaining agreement
D: holding that oral agreement made in connection with reinstatement should be treated as part of collective bargaining agreement
A.