With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". also be liable for all injuries and property damage sustained by any person or domestic animal as a result of an attack by the dangerous dog. Id. § 2602(12). It is unclear why the Legislature provided for two definitions of one single term in two different subsections of the same statute. Nonetheless, “[i]t is well established the [courts] should, if possible, construe statutes harmoniously.” V.I. Taxi Assoc. v. W. Indian Co., Ltd., 66 V.I. 473, 484 (V.I. 2017) (internal quotations omitted); see also Fish v. Kobach, 840 F.3d 710 (10th Cir. 2016) (“A court must therefore interpret the statute as a symmetrical and coherent regulatory scheme, and fit, if possible, all parts into an harmonious whole.”) (internal citations omitted); Shumate v. Patterson, 943 F.2d 362, 365 (4th Cir. 1991) (<HOLDING>). Thus, all of the terms defined in section

A: recognizing possible conflict between the cases
B: recognizing conflict
C: recognizing the rule that whenever possible statutes should be read in harmony and not in conflict with each other
D: holding that statutes dealing with same subject matter should be construed with reference to each other as parts of one system
C.