With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". 834 (2011); Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 392, 98 S.Ct. 2408, 2413, 57 L.Ed.2d 290, 300 (1978) (recognizing police officers have the right to make warrantless entries and searches into homes when they reasonably believe immediate aid is required). 6 United States v. Pichany, 687 F.2d 204, 207 (7th Cir.1982). 7 United States v. Erickson, 991 F.2d 529, 533 (9th Cir.1993). 8 United States v. Bute, 43 F.3d 531, 535 (10th Cir.1994). 9 United States v. York, 895 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (5th Cir.1990) 10 United States v. Rohrig, 98 F.3d 1506, 1514—15 (6th Cir.1996) 11 United States v. Quezada, 448 F.3d 1005, 1008 (8th Cir.2006) 12 Other states have also permitted warrantless searches of a home under the community caretaker exception. See Laney v. State, 76 S.W.3d 524, 527, 530 (Tex.App.2002) (<HOLDING>); People v. Ray, 21 Cal.4th 464, 88 Cal.Rptr.2d

A: holding that the bia correctly imputed a parents knowledge that she and her children were not eligible for entry to the united states to her children
B: holding wife unreasonably exposed neighbors children to danger because she invited the children over in spite of knowing her husband had molested children in the past
C: holding that fathers failure to acquire suitable home for his children pay even nominal child support visit or correspond with his children or make efforts to secure permanent employment were sufficient to demonstrate conscious disregard of his parental obligations
D: holding that police lawfully entered defendants residence to assist children after defendant admitted that the children were not his and that he had been arrested for indecency with a child previously
D.