With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". State highway and providing alternative access through a road other than the State highway. N.J.A.C. 16:47 — 4.33(d)(1). Thus, the regulatory action here was a modification and not a revocation. 4 While the State Highway Access Management Code contemplates a hearing in the Office of Administrative Law in the case of a revocation, N.J.A.C. 16:47-4.33(d)(1), there is no similar provision applicable to a modification. We have no occasion to pass upon the distinction this regulation draws between revocation and modification. 5 Most States generally recognize that regulation of access per se is noncompensable so long as the property retains a reasonable means of ingress and egress. See, e.g., Ark. State Highway Comm'n v. Union Planters Nat'l Bank, 231 Ark. 907, 333 S.W.2d 904, 912-13 (1960) (<HOLDING>); W.R. Assocs. of Norwalk v. Comm'r of Transp.,

A: holding that a showing of a change in circumstances that is or is likely to be beneficial to the child may also warrant a change in custody
B: holding court cannot change custody without showing that change is in best interests of child
C: holding that a change of venue has no affect on the applicable state law and that change of venue is but a change of courtrooms
D: holding that loss of business attributable to change in traffic flow is noncompensable
D.