With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". ALJ should consider the relationship between the physician and the claimant (treating and examining physicians being given more weight); the extent to which medical evidence supports the opinion; the opinion’s consistency with the record as a whole; the physician’s specialization; and other relevant factors. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527(c), 416.927(c) (2012). An ALJ may not discount a treating physician’s opinion without articulating good cause for doing so. See Winschel v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 631 F.3d 1176, 1179 (11th Cir. 2011). Acceptable reasons for discounting the opinion of a treating physician are that it is conclusory; it is unsupported by medical evidence; it is inconsistent with the record as a whole; or other evidence supports a contrary finding. See Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1159 (<HOLDING>); Phillips, 357 F.3d at 1241 (holding that

A: holding that the alj properly discounted a treating physicians report where the physician was unsure of the accuracy of his findings and statements
B: recognizing that treating physicians opinion does not automatically control or obviate need to evaluate record as whole and that aljs decision to discount treating physicians medicalsource statement was upheld where limitations were never mentioned in numerous treatment records or supported by any explanation
C: holding that where the alj had already  obtained and considered reports from treating physicians the alj had before him a complete medical history and the evidence received from the treating physicians was adequate for him to make a determination as to disability
D: holding that treating physicians testimony was properly discounted when it was inconsistent with physicians own treatment reports and the record as a whole and appeared to be based on patients subjective complaints
D.