With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Judge. Maurice D. Starks appeals the order denying his motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because neither Miller v. Alabama, -U.S.-,-, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2475, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), nor Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 2030, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), applies to Starks’ life sentences for his homicide and his nonhomicide convictions, respectively. Consequently, his llegal under Graham, 130 S.Ct. at 2030 (<HOLDING>). We write to explain why the postconviction

A: holding that life without parole sentences for nonhomicide offenses violates the eighth amendment
B: holding that the eighth amendment forbids life without the possibility of parole for a juvenile who commits a nonhomicide offense
C: holding that a juvenile seventeen years old or younger cannot be sentenced to life without parole in a nonhomicide case
D: holding that the eighth amendment prohibits mandatory life without the possibility of parole for a juvenile who commits homicide a judge or jury must have the opportunity to consider mitigating circumstances before imposing the harshest possible penalty for juveniles
B.