With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (2008) (“The Eighth Amendment, applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that ‘excessive bail shall not be required’....”); Schilb v. Kuebel, 404 U.S. 357, 365, 92 S.Ct. 479, 30 L.Ed.2d 502 (1971) (“[T]he Eighth Amendment’s proscription of excessive bail has been assumed to have application to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment.”). Excess bail is banned as part of the panoply of integrated constitutional limitations on both the states and the national government in criminal case 077-80 (D.Neb.2009) (same); United States v. Rueb, 612 F.Supp.2d 1068, 1074 (D.Neb.2009) (same); United States v. Vujnovich, No. 07-20126-01-CM-DJW, 2008 WL 687203, at *2-3 (D.Kan. Mar. 11, 2008) (same); United States v. Torres, 566 F.Supp.2d 591, 596-99, 601 (W.D.Tex.2008) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Arzberger, 592 F.Supp.2d

A: holding that adam walsh act does not prohibit inspection by defense expert
B: holding that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment incorporates the eighth amendments guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment
C: holding that adam walsh act does not violate procedural due process require excessive bail or violate separation of powers
D: holding that adam walsh act violates the eighth amendments prohibition against excessive bail and the fifth amendments guarantee of procedural due process
D.