With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". judge’s determination of probable cause in the issuance of a search warrant that is ultimately found to be invalid. The officer’s reliance on the magistrate judge’s probable cause determination must be objectively reasonable. Id. at 922-23, 104 S.Ct. at 3420-21. Four circumstances exist in which the Leon good faith exception does not apply and suppression remains an appropriate remedy: (1) the magistrate judge issuing the warrant was misled by statements made by the affiant that were false or made “in reckless disregard for the truth”; (2) “the issuing magistrate judge wholly abandoned his [or her] judicial role”; (3) the affidavit in support of the warrant is “so lacking in indicia of probable cause L.Ed.2d 373 (1984); United States v. Portillo-Reyes, 529 F.2d 844, 848 (9th Cir.1975) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 899, 97 S.Ct. 267, 50

A: holding that a drug sniff outside the front door of the defendants residence was not a fourth amendment search because the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy at the entrance to property that is open to the public including the front porch
B: holding that mere insertion of key was not a search or at least not an unreasonable search protected by the fourth amendment
C: holding that the insertion of a key into the door of a car to see if it fit constituted the beginning of a search because there is a reasonable expectation of privacy
D: holding that passengers lacked any reasonable expectation of privacy and therefore had no standing to challenge the search of the vehicle
C.