With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". been updated to account for amendments to CrR 4.2(g) that took effect on September 1, 1996. Those amendments, however, are not material here. 4 CP at 5-8. 5 Report of Proceedings (RP) at 17. 6 Suppl. finding 6. 7 Suppl. finding 3. 8 Suppl. finding 7. 9 The trial judge did note this at a hearing held three years later. See RP 73-74. 10 CP at 51, lines 3-4. 11 CP at 20. 12 RP at 73; see also RP at 75. 13 RP at 73-74. 14 CrR 7.8(b) contains parallel provisions. It adds little to the statute for purposes of this case. For convenience, we refer only to the statute. 15 Br. of Appellant at 32. 16 99 Wn. App. 423, 993 P.2d 296 (2000). 17 In re Pers. Restraint of Hoisington, 99 Wn. App. at 431; see also State v. Robinson, 104 Wn. App. 657, 667, 17 P.3d 653, review denied, 145 Wn.2d 1002 (2001) (<HOLDING>). For additional cases in which the court or a

A: holding that 42 usc  405g may be equitably tolled based on a plaintiffs mental impairment
B: holding that  2401b of the ftca can be equitably tolled
C: recognizing authority but declining to issue writ
D: recognizing that rcw 1073090 can be equitably tolled but declining to toll it in the particular case
D.