With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the final order. The principal contention of the employer/carrier is that there was no clear and convincing evidence to overcome the. opin--ion of the expert medical advisor. The judge of compensation claims relied on the testimony of Dr. Hooshmand to determine the statutory presumption of correctness with regard to the expert medical advisor’s opinion was overcome by clear and convincing evidence. The record before us contains substantial competent evidence to support that finding. The employer/carrier did not contest the competence of Dr. Hooshmand to render an expert opinion on the effects of lightning strikes and electrical injuries. The judge of compensation claims was swayed by Dr. Hooshmand’s thirty plus years experience and specialization in this area of -82 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (<HOLDING>). Patty Schmitt’s treating physician’s

A: holding presumption overcome based on competent substantial record evidence which the judge could reasonably find to be clear and convincing
B: holding that a party seeking to establish particular claims as invalid must overcome the presumption of validity in 35 usc  282 by clear and convincing evidence
C: holding that in reviewing a defendants motion for judgment of acquittal based on insanity which the defendant must prove by clear and convincing evidence the court must determine whether no reasonable jury could have failed to find that the defendants criminal insanity at the time of the offense was established by clear and convincing evidence
D: recognizing presumption and finding that it was overcome
A.