With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM: Death row inmate, Manuel Valle, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He complains that he was denied clemency proceedings or alternatively was denied clemency itself without the benefit of a clemency investigation and clemency counsel. Petitions under § 2254 cannot be brought to challenge the process by which clemency decisions are made when issuance of a writ would not actually or impliedly invalidate a sentence. See Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 81, 125 S.Ct. 1242, 1247-48, 161 L.Ed.2d 253 (2005) (“§ 1983 remains available for procedural challenges where success in the action would not necessarily spell immediate or speedier release for the prisoner”); Hutcherson v. Riley, 468 F.3d 750, 754 (11th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). Federal habeas corpus law exists to provide a

A: recognizing that  1983 and  2254 proceedings are mutually exclusive so that if a claim can be properly raised in one of those proceedings it cannot be raised in the other type of proceeding
B: holding claims not raised in  2254 application are forfeited
C: holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal
D: holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
A.