With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the later aural disclosure of the contents.”). 8 . See, e.g., Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 236 F.3d 1035, 1043 n. 1 (9th Cir.2001) ("If a person secretes a recorder in a room and thereby records a conversation between two others, an 'acquisition' occurs at the time the recording is made.”); Sanders v. Robert Bosch Corp., 38 F.3d 736, 740 (4th Cir.1994) ("The recording of a telephone conversation alone constitutes an 'aural * * * acquisition' of that conversation.”); United States v. Wuliger, 981 F.2d 1497, 1502-03 (6th Cir.1992) ("Noncon- sensual recordings violate the Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1)(a).”); Pascale v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 898 F.Supp. 276, 279 (D.N.J.1995) (same); Lane v. Allstate Insurance Co., 114 Nev. 1176, 969 P.2d 938, 940 (199 91, 1394-95 (6th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); see also Sanders, 38 F.3d at 740 n. 8

A: holding that it was error to admit into evidence a gun purchased by the defendant which was not connected with the charged crimes
B: holding that defense of fraud was waived where no special issue was submitted and there was disputed evidence
C: holding that a recorder connected to an extension phone which was activated automatically when the extension phone handset was lifted was an interception device where there was no evidence that the recorder could have operated independently of the telephone
D: holding that even if the industry and federal regulations evidenced an inherent danger and the defendant knew or should have realized that the device was or was likely to be dangerous for the use for which it was supplied there was a complete absence of evidence that the defendant had reason to believe that the plaintiff or its employees would not realize the danger
C.