With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". (a) Offense defined.— (1) A person is guilty of robbery if, in the course of committing a theft, he: (iv) inflicts bodily injury upon another or threatens another with or intentionally puts him in fear of immediate bodily injury.... 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3701(a)(l)(iv) (bold in original) (footnote added). ¶ 10 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 2301 defines “b nsufficient to sustain his convictions for simple assault, possession of an instrument of crime, and recklessly endangering another person. ¶ 14 We begin with an analysis of the evidence as it relates to recklessly endangering another perso ufficient to sustain the elements for recklessly endangering another person, we also conclude the evidence was sufficient for the crime of simple assault. See Commonwealth v. Dale, 836 A.2d 150 (Pa.Super.2003) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 17 Finally, we examine Appellant’s

A: holding that tendering of assault instruction in attempted capital murder case was sufficient under rule 5a18 to alert the trial judge and the commonwealth that simple assault is a lesserincluded offense of attempted capital murder and that the defendant believed sufficient evidence supported granting the instruction
B: holding that aggravated assault was not a lesser included offense in prosecution for armed burglary attempted robbery and use of a firearm in the com mission of a felony because the allegation in the information that the accused carried a firearm was insufficient to charge the elements of aggravated assault
C: holding reclassification impermissible where underlying felony of attempted thirddegree murder with a firearm was aggravated assault and aggravated assault includes the use of a deadly weapon as a necessary element
D: holding that where evidence was sufficient for attempted murder it was necessarily sufficient for aggravated assault which is a lesser included offense
D.