With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the hourly rates applied by the district court for the AC & B attorneys were as follows: Joaquin Arriola — $200.00; Mark Co-wan — $195.00; Anita Arriola — $175.00. The hourly rate applied for the local ACLU lawyer, Carl Varady, was $150.00. 2 . Those hourly rates were as follows: Lynn Pal-trow — $241.00; Rachel Pine — $241.00; Simon Heller — $25.00 (for services which could have been performed by someone of less skill and knowledge) and $135.00; Louise Melling— $135.00; Ellen Goetj — $100.00; and Andrew Dwyer — $80.00. 3 . As our colleague has so aptly stated in the past: Appellate judges should be aware of their limitations. They can guide and review, but they cánnot run the show. United Sta L.Ed.2d 132 (1993); Shipes v. Trinity Industries, 987 F.2d 311, 323 (5th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 991, 114 S.Ct. 548,

A: recognizing that enhancement for results obtained may be warranted
B: holding that sentence enhancement for crimes committed against law enforcement officers may be applied when information charges qualifying offense information does not need to recite enhancement statute
C: holding that in a statutory fee case the results obtained factor was already subsumed in the lodestar and that results multipliers should be awarded only in some cases of exceptional success
D: holding that dna test results warranted a new trial of a postconviction petitioner who was convicted of rape and kidnaping
A.