With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". suspicion and because school officials had seen the student smoking out of a pipe. Kennedy I, 2000-NMSC-025, ¶ 17, 129 N.M. 436, 10 P.3d 115. Kennedy I’s predecessor, Kennedy v. Dexter Consol. Sch., 1998-NMCA-051, ¶ 13, 124 N.M. 764, 955 P.2d 693 (Kennedy II, rev’d in part on other grounds by Kennedy, 2000-NMSC-025, ¶¶ 20-22, 129 N.M. 436, 10 P.3d 115, similarly refers to out-of-state case law that do not involve a strip search to support this Court’s conclusion that individualized suspicion is ordinarily necessary for a search by school officials. See, e.g., DesRoches v. Caprio, 974 F.Supp. 542 (E.D.Va.1997) (backpack search for missing shoes); Burnham v. West, 681 F.Supp. 1160 (E.D.Va.1987) (search of pockets, purses, and bags); In re Doe, 11 Hawai'i 435, 887 P.2d 645, 655 (1994) (<HOLDING>). {17} In addition to the discussion of cases

A: holding that search of defendants purse which he carried was authorized by a warrant to search his person
B: holding that bjecause a search of a students wallet purse or other bag carried on his or her person is undoubtedly a severe violation of subjective expectations of privacy  individualized suspicion is a necessary element in determining reasonableness where  the principal emptied the contents of the mjinors purse internal quotation marks and citation omitted
C: holding that car passenger who left her purse in her boyfriends car had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of her purse indeed a purse is a type of container in which a person possesses the highest expectations of privacy
D: holding that a shoulder purse carried by a person at the time he is stopped lies within the scope of a warrant authorizing the search of his person
B.