With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the interest and penalty measures promulgated by the Board, it was merely acting pursuant to a right it held under the contract, and no contractual term of the Lease was impaired. This Court also noted in Consolidation Coal that there is a critical difference “between interest provided for by contract and interest provided as damages.” 886 P.2d at 528 n. 23. In other words, if a law changes or abrogates interest payments explicitly provided by the contract, such a law would impair the contractual rights of the parties; whereas, if a law merely changes the amount of interest provided by law as a remedy for breach of the contract, the underlying contract is not necessarily impaired. Cf. Morley v. Lake Shore & Mich. S. Ry., 146 U.S. 162, 168-71, 13 S.Ct. 54, 56-58, 36 L.Ed. 925 (1892) (<HOLDING>). Trail Mountain, relying on General Motors

A: holding that trial court erred by dismissing breach of contract claim because appellee made promises to perform specific acts in contract the breach of which would give rise to a breach of contract action
B: holding that interest assessed pursuant to judgment on breach of contract action was not itself contractually vested right immune to alteration by legislative action
C: holding that a cause of action for breach of contract accrues at the time of the breach
D: holding breach of contract claim not preempted as a straightforward breach of contract action as it alleged violation of specific covenant
B.