With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to discriminate on the basis of some impermissible factor” constitute direct evidence of discrimination. Rojas v. Florida, 285 F.3d 1339, 1342 n. 2 (11th Cir.2002) (quoting Schoenfeld, 168 F.3d at 1266). If the alleged statement suggests, but does not prove, a discriminatory motive, then it is considered circumstantial evidence. See Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc., 376 F.3d 1079, 1086 (11th Cir.2004). At trial, Akouri testified about a conversation he had with Blanchard he premise for the DOT’s employment decision was discriminatory. Although Blanchard denied making the statement, we may not weigh the evidence or make credibility determinations when reviewing the district court’s order denying a party’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. See Reeves, 530 U.S. at 150, 120 S.Ct. 2097 (<HOLDING>). Thus, we do not disturb the jury’s finding of

A: holding that credibility determinations are reviewed only for substantial evidence
B: holding that the jury is the judge of the weight and credibility given to witness testimony
C: holding that credibility determinations the weighing of the evidence and the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts are jury functions not those of a judge
D: holding that the postconviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses
C.