With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". for appellant. Sherry Boston, Solicitor-General, Wystan Getz, Samantha J. Newman, Assistant Solicitors-General, for appellee. Judgment affirmed. McFadden, J., concurs. Ellington, P. J., concurs in judgment only. 1 See, e.g., Powell v. State, 310 Ga. App. 144, 144 (712 SE2d 139) (2011). 2 See OCGA § 16-6-8 (a) (2). 3 See OCGA § 16-6-8 (a) (3). 4 See English v. State, 301 Ga. App. 842, 842 (689 SE2d 130) (2010). 5 Jones v. State, 318 Ga. App. 26, 29(1) (733 SE2d 72) (2012) (punctuation omitted); see also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B) (99 SCt 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 6 Miller v. State, 273 Ga. 831, 832 (546 SE2d 524) (2001) (punctuation omitted). 7 OCGA § 16-6-8 (a) (2). 8 OCGA § 16-6-8 (a) (3). 9 See Douglas v. State, 330 Ga. App. 549, 551 (1) (768 SE2d 526) (2015) (<HOLDING>); Whitfield v. State, 259 Ga. App. 61, 61-62

A: holding evidence was sufficient to support conviction for public indecency when after an altercation in a parking lot defendant stood in front of the car exposed his penis shook it and told a woman to suck it
B: holding that plaintiff failed to offer sufficient evidence to support a finding that a similar position existed after his termination
C: holding a conviction for lewd conduct with a sevenyearold was sufficient when presented with evidence of other sexual misconduct to establish a pattern of sexual misconduct with vulnerable young women
D: holding that sufficient evidence existed to support conviction for public indecency by a lewd exposure of sexual organs when a witness noticed defendant masturbating on a bench outside of a shopping mall and could clearly see his exposed penis
D.