With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to 121 months’ imprisonment. Familiarity with the factual and procedural history of this case is assumed. On appeal, Salazar argues that the District Court erroneously found that he did not qualify for a minor role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We review for clear error a sentencing court’s finding that a defendant did not play a minor role in an offense. United States v. Brunshtein, 344 F.3d 91, 102 (2d Cir.2003); United States v. Castano, 234 F.3d 111, 113 (2d Cir.2000). We find no such error with the District Court’s determination that Salazar was not a minor participant. Salazar transported narcotics or narcotics proceeds between Nicaragua and the United States on ten separate occasions over a sixteen-month period. See United States v. Shonubi, 998 F.2d 84 (2d Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). In addition to handling large quantities of

A: holding that a courier who regularly engaged in drug smuggling by taking eight trips to nigeria over a fifteenmonth period was properly denied a minor role reduction
B: holding that reasonable suspicion justified abdominal xray of suspected drug courier
C: holding that despite differences in method evidence of subsequent drug smuggling could be admitted to show prior knowledge and intent
D: holding that unknowing drug courier testimony was admissible in a complex drug importation case
A.