With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 1 . Mejorado mentions that the court violated his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights by preventing him from consulting with Reyna during the suppression hearing, but fails to adequately brief this assertion. The closest that Mejorado comes to arguing the point is the Delphic reference in his reply brief to McKas-kle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168, 104 S.Ct. 944, 79 L.Ed.2d 122 (1984). Mejorado, however, does not explain how McKaskle, which held that a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right are not violated when a trial judge appoints standby counsel, or any other case or authority supports his view. Accordingly, the issue is waived. United States v. Bailentia, 717 F.3d 448, 449 (5th Cir.2013) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 543, 187

A: holding issues raised in notice of appeal but not briefed are deemed waived
B: holding that generally arguments not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned or waived
C: holding that an inadequately briefed assertion is waived on appeal
D: recognizing that arguments not briefed on appeal are waived
C.