With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Petitioner Gustavo Escobedo-Fernandez (Escobedo) seeks review of the reinstatement by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of his 1997 order of deportation. He also challenges the dismissal by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of his two motions to reopen and his motion to reconsider. 1. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the DHS’s reinstatement of Escobe-do’s 1997 order of deportation because he did not appeal that order to the BIA. See Garcia de Rincon v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 539 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (requiring

A: recognizing that other jurisdictional limitations within 8 usc  1252 remain applicable
B: holding that 28 usc  2401 is a jurisdictional statute of limitations
C: holding statute of limitations is jurisdictional and may be raised at any time but noting other ohio appellate courts have held the statute of limitations is not jurisdictional and may be waived if not asserted at the trial level
D: holding that this courts sixyear statute of limitations is jurisdictional
A.