With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". by § 1983. See Carlson, 446 U.S. at 19-22, 100 S.Ct. at 1472-73; Robertson v. Wegmann, 436 U.S. 584, 590-91, 98 S.Ct. 1991, 1995, 56 L.Ed.2d 554 (1978). Section 1983 provides that one who under the color of any state law deprives another of rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution shall be Hable in an action at law or equity. Id. Our analysis focuses on two questions. First, we must determine whether there is an impUed private right of action for damages against governmental entities for violations of the Texas Constitution. Second, we must decide whether we may look to the Constitution to define the element of duty for a Texas common law cause of action. A. Because Texas has no provision comparable to § 1983, the first question must be answered 652, 459 N.E.2d 453 (1983) (<HOLDING>); Rockhouse Mountain Property Owners Ass’n v.

A: recognizing that oath taken to honor state constitution makes it the justices duty to apply the state constitution when it does not conflict with the federal constitution
B: holding that deprivation of personal property does not violate the constitution if there are adequate state remedies available
C: holding that because of statutory remedial scheme court would not imply a cause of action arising directly under the state constitution
D: holding that when there are no other remedies it is appropriate for the courts to imply one under the state constitution
D.