With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". accident insurance” as a collateral source. Id. Respondent argues that UIM benefits are akin to payments from the tortfeasor’s liability insurance, which do not constitute collateral sources. Respondent relies on Do, a case in which the supreme court held that “a payment made by a tortfeasor’s automobile insurer is not a collateral source” under section 548.251. 779 N.W.2d at 855. The supreme court observed that the ordinary meaning of “collateral source” refers to a source “wholly independent of’ and unconnected with the tortfeasor, and held that payments made to an injured claimant by the tortfeasor’s liability insurer constitute a direct rather than a collateral source because they derive directly from the tortfeasor’s insurance. See id. at 859-60; see also Dean, 535 N.W.2d at 345 (<HOLDING>). As a result, they do not constitute

A: holding that payments from a tortfeasors insurer are not from a collateral source because they stem directly from the tortfeasor
B: holding that violence that does not stem from particularized animosity but rather from a financial incentive does not constitute persecution
C: holding hospital could not enforce ben directly against tortfeasors insurer because patient had no right to directly sue insurer
D: holding that an insurer can be estopped from denying coverage for failure to make payments where that insurer has established a course of conduct of accepting late payments
A.