With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". given that applying the Establishment Clause to all government actions that impede religion would render the Free Exercise Clause superflous, the Court will dismiss Plaintiffs’ Establishment Clause claim as it pertains to Defendants’ alleged attempts to impede Plaintiffs’ religion. However, Plaintiffs also allege the Defendants attempted to advance their own religious beliefs and to impose those beliefs on the Plaintiffs and their children by sharing their religious views with Plaintiffs’ children and forcing them to listen to “Christian music.” Complaint, ¶¶ 59, 66. These alleged actions have no apparent secular purpose and would have a primary effect of advancing Defendants’ religion. As such, these alleged actions would constitute violations of the Establishment Clause. Lemon, supra (<HOLDING>) Therefore, to the extent that Plaintiffs

A: holding that governmental actions violate the establishment clause if they have no secular purpose have a primary effect of advancing religion or foster excessive governmental entanglement with religion
B: recognizing a religious institutions right to free exercise of religion
C: holding that discrimination based on religion is subjected to strict scrutiny whether a claim arises under the establishment clause the free exercise clause of equal protection clause
D: holding that a party held in prisons visiting room did not have the effect of advancing religion where it was dubbed a christmas party and some songs contained religious lyrics
A.