With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. In this direct appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court erred in revoking his probation based upon new law violations that were not charged in the affidavit of violation of probation. However, Appellant neither lodged contemporaneous objection to the revocation nor filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) motion to preserve this error for appeal. Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla.2003) (<HOLDING>); Jones v. State, 876 So.2d 642, 644-45 (Fla.

A: holding that all sentencing errors must be preserved
B: holding that it is an abuse of discretion to make errors of law or clear errors of factual determination
C: holding that to establish prejudice the defendant must show a reasonable likelihood that the sentencing courts obvious errors affected his sentence
D: holding that issues must be briefed to be preserved on appeal
A.