With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Jenney has waived the privilege as to these matters. Neither party is entirely correct. As an initial matter, a petition for certiorari is the proper vehicle by which to review this type of discovery order. See Robichaud v. Kennedy, 711 So.2d 186, 187 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (“Certiorari is the appropriate avenue to challenge a trial court order directing the disclosure of communications presumptively covered by the attorney client privilege.”). The standard of review is whether the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in ordering disclosure, thereby causing irreparable harm to the petitioner. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Fla. Constr., Commerce & Indus. Self Insurers Fund, 720 So.2d 535, 535-36 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Turning to the substance of the . 2d DCA 1980) (<HOLDING>). Here, the employment agreement was not

A: holding that a document which is given to an attorney in the course of seeking legal advice is privileged in the hands of the attorney only if it was privileged in the hands of the client
B: holding that if documents are privileged in the hands of the client they retain that privilege when given to an attorney for the purpose of seeking legal advice
C: holding that discussions between management personnel concerning legal advice given by attorney is privileged even when attorney is not physically present
D: holding that retention of an attorney to investigate an insurance claim and make a coverage determination under a policy is a classic example of a client seeking legal advice from an attorney
B.