With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". A non-evidentia-ry hearing was held on the motion by a magistrate judge. However, no transcript of the hearing was included in the record on appeal. After the magistrate issued its recommended order, Robinson filed exceptions and a motion for rehearing related thereto. No transcript of the hearing which was conducted on the motion for rehearing was included in the record on appeal. The circuit court thereafter granted the motion to dismiss, finding there was no good cause or excusable neglect proffered by Robinson which excused the insufficiency of process. Robinson challenges the trial court’s final order of dismissal, claiming that the trial court was not legally justified in dismissing her complaint. We disagree. An order dismissing a cause of action for failure to timely ser 2004)(<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED. SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur. 1

A: holding that this line of cases was not on point and that no error was apparent on the face of the record due to lack of reporters record from defaultjudgment hearing because the judgment reflected that it was based only on the pleadings and affidavits that were in the record
B: holding without a transcript of proceedings below review on appeal is limited to errors of law that are apparent on face of record
C: recognizing that the appellate court may reverse an error of law on the face of the judgment when the record contains no transcript of the final hearing
D: holding appeal of termination is limited to information that is part of the record
B.