With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". Other Arguments Fail. Given this conclusion, I would reach the Jerrels’ Open Meetings Act and due process argu 6 . See Op. at 143-144. 17 . Op. at 139. 18 . See Kodiak Seafood Processors, 900 P.2d at 1197 (agency action was not regulation when it affected only one individual). 19 . AS 03.40.020; see 11 AAC 60.070. 20 . 11 AAC 60.070. 21 . Op. at 144. 22 . See 11 AAC 60.070. 23 . See AS 38.05.035. 24 . See AS 38.05.005 (establishing Division of Lands); AS 38.05.020(b)(1) (stating that DNR Commissioner may adopt reasonable regulations); AS 38.05.035 (showing that Division of Lands director has not been delegated regulatory authority). 25 . See Kachemak Bay Watch, 935 P.2d at 825; Kodiak Seafood Processors, 900 P.2d at 1197. 26 . Kachemak Bay Watch, 935 P.2d at 825-26. 27 . See id. (<HOLDING>); Kodiak Seafood Processors, 900 P.2d at

A: holding failure to exercise discretion is abuse of discretion
B: holding that under mayfield the exercise of discretion based on a mistaken premise of law can be a failure to properly exercise discretion
C: holding that dnrs exercise of task assigned to it by legislature invariably involved exercise of agency discretion and did not constitute regulation under apa nor abuse of discretion
D: holding that if the legislature has granted the agency discretion over a particular matter then we review the agencys action pursuant to the deferential abuse of discretion standard  bearing in mind that the legislature determines the boundaries of that discretion
C.