With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". as temporary; she claims that the agreement “is not worded in such a way that it states it will terminate on that date, rather the wording is such that the guardianship could continue past that date.” Guardian’s Brief at 12. Guardian’s interpretation is patently incorrect. The plain language of the agreement set a maximum length of the guardianship—until August 29, 2014—but provided that it could end sooner by being revoked prior to that end date. Nothing in the agreement contemplates an extension of Guardian’s appointment beyond August 29, 2014. Thus, the trial court properly construed the agreement as a temporary guardianship. The temporary nature of the guardianship rendered Children’s absence from Texas a temporary absence. M.E.V. v. B.D.V., 57 A.3d 126, 133 (Pa. Super. 2012) (<HOLDING>). Under our definition of “home state,”

A: holding that absence from prior state was temporary during the time it was contemplated that the parent and child would return to the other state
B: holding that in the absence of an adequate state remedy one whose constitutional rights are violated has a direct claim against the state under the state constitution
C: holding that a state agency created under state law was a state actor
D: holding that the state police is a state agency
A.