With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". CURIAM. DENIED. See Barnes v. Barnes, 124 So.3d 994, 996 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (<HOLDING>). WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ.,

A: holding new york could lawfully modify a florida custody decree because florida court had right under florida law to change the decree
B: recognizing that as to notice publication in the laws of florida or the florida statutes gives all citizens constructive notice of the consequences of their actions
C: holding that when an accident occurs outside florida workers compensation benefits are payable only if the contract of employment was made in florida or if the employees employment is principally located in florida
D: recognizing home state jurisdiction under  61514la florida statutes if florida was the childs home state at any time during the six months preceding the filing of the custody proceeding
D.