With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". addition to any judgment awarded to a plaintiff. Id.; 43 P.S. § 260.9a(f). ¶ 17 Presently, Appellee brought suit against Crown for breach of contract and for violating the WPCL. After the trial court found a mutual mistake existed regarding Appellee’s entitlement to severance pay, it reformed the contract to include the severance payment. Thus, Crown was obligated to pay Appellee one-year’s salary as severance. Because Ap-pellee was forced to bring a breach of contract claim to collect that payment, he was entitled to recover attorneys’ fees under the WPCL. The award clearly supports the purpose of the WPCL; namely, permitting Appellee to collect the severance payment which he was owed without causing him to incur the costs associated with the collection. See Oberneder, 674 A.2d at 722 (<HOLDING>). ¶ 18 Judgment

A: holding that under the wpcl an employee who has prevailed on a claim for past wages due is entitled to attorneys fees as a matter of entitlement
B: holding that a plaintiff who prevailed on a 42 usc  1983 claim was entitled to an award of attorneys fees incurred on appeal
C: holding that each plaintiff is liable for fees if he would have been entitled to his fees if he had prevailed
D: holding that the plaintiff who prevailed in an ipra enforcement action was entitled to an award of damages fees and costs
A.