With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". to Supreme Court precedent unless and until abrogated by the Supreme Court, Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., 120 F.3d 1140, 1143 (11th Cir.1997) (en banc), and Almendarez-Torres controls the outcome in this case, see United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249, 1257 (11th Cir.2004). Even if Almendarez-Torres were to be abrogated, the district court did not err in enhancing Burke’s sentence. Burke failed to lodge any factual challenge to his prior conviction set forth in the PSI. Thus, Burke effectively admitted to having a pri- or conviction for a felony drug trafficking offense, which constituted an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B), Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 101(a)(43). See United States v. Gibson, 434 F.3d 1234, 1251 (11th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Shelton, 400 F.3d 1325, 1330

A: holding that factual findings set forth in the psi not objected to by a defendant are deemed admitted
B: holding that because the defendant did not object to the factual recitations in the psi he effectively admitted the facts in the psi
C: holding that where defendant failed to object to facts in psi relating to prior conviction the failure to object constituted an admission
D: holding that the defendant conceded the accuracy of his prior convictions in his psi report by failing to object to the report
B.