With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". one agreement is excused if the parties agreed that a new agreement would take its place. Failure to comply by Rob Schleider is excused if all of the following circumstances occurred: 1. Beal Bank a. by words or conduct made a false representation or concealed material facts; b. with knowledge of the facts or with knowledge or information that would lead a reasonable person to discover the facts; and c. with the intention that Rob Schleider would rely on the false representation or concealment in acting or deciding not to act; and 2. Rob Schleider a. did not know and had no means of knowing the real facts; and b. relied to his detriment on the false representation or concealment of material facts. A. Modification and novation. As the jury was 644 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1984, no writ) (<HOLDING>); Bridewell v. Pritchett, 562 S.W.2d 956,

A: holding that the measure of damages for the breach of a contract of sale where no fraud is shown is the difference between the contract price and the market price of the goods on the date of the breach
B: holding contract for sale of water which did not specify price was unenforceable because price of water was essence of contract
C: holding that a contract for the design construction and installation of a water tank was predominantly a contract for the sale of goods under the ucc
D: holding contract unenforceable because rate of interest was of the essence and not detail to be supplied by court
B.