With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and may affirm on any ground supported by the record. Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Martinez’s state law and declaratory judgment causes of action because Martinez failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim for relief. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009); see also Stock W., Inc. v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, 873 F.2d 1221, 1225 (9th Cir. 1989) (<HOLDING>); Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 129

A: holding that the declaratory judgment act 28 usc  2201 only creates a remedy and is not an independent basis for jurisdiction
B: holding that where jurisdiction was based on 28 usc  2201 venue was determined as per 28 usc  1391
C: recognizing that the declaratory judgment act is procedural in nature and not an extension of federal court jurisdiction
D: holding that the declaratory judgment act is remedial only and the party seeking declaratory relief must have an underlying cause of action
A.