With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". pet. h.) (relying on recent courts of appeals’ opinions to find no state action in grand jury subpoena and no privacy right in medical records because of repeal of physician/patient privilege); Clark v. State, 933 S.W.2d 332 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1996, no. pet.) (finding no state action and no physician/patient privilege); Corpus v. State, 931 S.W.2d 30 (Tex.App.—Austin 1996, pet. granted) (declaring that repeal of physician/patient privilege eliminated privacy interest in medical records); Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no pet.) (explaining that this Court’s rejection of physician/patient privilege is evidence that society finds no reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records); State v. Jenkins, 80 Wis.2d 426, 259 N.W.2d 109, 113 (1977) (<HOLDING>). 5 . The majority concludes that society would

A: holding that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in utility records under either state or federal constitution
B: holding that constitutional right of privacy does not apply to medical records
C: holding no reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records because of statutory exception to physicianpatient privilege in homicide trials
D: recognizing the tort of breach of physicianpatient privilege
C.