With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". also free to believe her trial testimony over her statement made to the police during their investigation. See Chambers v. State, 805 S.W.2d 459, 461 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); Sharp v. State, 707 S.W.2d 611, 614 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 872, 109 S.Ct. 190, 102 L.Ed.2d 159 (1988); see also Fuentes v. State, 991 S.W.2d 267, 271 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1026, 120 S.Ct. 541, 145 L.Ed.2d 420 (1999) (noting that inconsistency goes to the credibility of the witnesses and the jury is the sole judge of that issue). Further, the jury was free to disregard any or all of her testimony, including whether to believe her account of where Delgadillo’s body fell after he was shot. See Walker v. State, 180 S.W.3d 829, 831-32 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet. ref'd) (<HOLDING>); see also Bowden v. State, 628 S.W.2d 782, 784

A: holding evidence legally and factually sufficient to convict for robbery even though sole eyewitnesss testimony that robbery lasted nearly two minutes was inconsistent with security tapes indicating that robbery lasted less than one minute
B: holding that the defendants sentence for robbery was not inappropriate
C: holding in part that robbery as a class b felony is not necessarily a lesserincluded offense of robbery as a class a felony
D: holding defendants participation in violent robbery and his fear of codefendants among other facts provided sufficient evidence that murder should have been anticipated as result of robbery
A.