With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". the original district court’s findings were corroborated by an abundance of trial testimony indicating that Wyche separated drugs and counted money for the conspiracy, collected money from individuals selling drugs, distributed cocaine for sale and supervised drug sales. Given Wyche’s extensive involvement, the 31 kilograms of cocaine base were reasonably foreseeable to him and thus he may be held responsible for that quantity. See United States v. Duncan, 639 F.3d 764, 767-69 (7th Cir.2011) (rejecting defendant’s claim that he did not foresee the conspiracy handling over 4.5 kilograms of cocaine base as “[imjplausible” and “baseless” where conspiracy sold “staggering amount of crack” and defendant had access to “stash-locations” and “high-level meetings”); Thomas, 114 F.3d at 256-57 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the 2012 district court did not

A: holding that resignation from conspiracy is insufficient if the defendant continues to do acts in furtherance of the conspiracy and continues to receive benefits from the conspiracys operations
B: holding that where the indictment charged drug quantity but drug quantity was not submitted to the jury the district court erred in using drug quantity to increase the penalty beyond the twentyyear maximum of  841b1c
C: holding defendant responsible for conspiracys entire drug quantity where defendant played managerial role in the conspiracy coordinated drug distribution and shared in conspiracys profits
D: holding that defendant is liable for entire quantity of drugs attributable to conspiracy in circumstances where defendant is one of conspiracys central figures
C.