With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". predecisional nor deliberative and, therefore, do not implicate the deliberative-process privilege. These eight documents are: CE523-524, CE555, CE580-585, CE3720, CE2539-2588, CE6838, CE6871-6873, and CE6899. Because the government did not meet its burden of showing that these documents fall within Exemption 5, it must disclose them to the plaintiff. Al-Fayed, 254 F.3d at 305; Summers, 140 F.3d at 1080. As to documents CE523-524, CE555, CE3720, CE6838, CE6871-6873, and CE6899, all or portions of them appear- to be neither predecisional nor deliberative. When conducting an in camera review, the court is at a disadvantage because it reviews the documents outside the context in which they were generated. See Johnson v. Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, 310 F.3d 771, 775 (D.C.Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). It is imperative, therefore, that the

A: holding one who claims tax exemption has burden of showing entitlement to exemption
B: recognizing burden
C: recognizing relevance of information and that need for this information outweighs the burden to appellants
D: recognizing that to meet its burden the government may need to explain the exemptions relevance in addition to simply statfing which exemption the agency claims for each withheld document
D.