With no explanation, chose the best option from "A", "B", "C" or "D". however, must be “consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” Id. The applicable policy statements, found in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, state that “the court shall not reduce the defendant’s term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and this policy statement to a term that is less than the minimum of the amended guideline range.” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A). The district court was prohibited from granting Gibson § 3582(c)(2) relief because, while he received a downward variance, he was sentenced as a career offender. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, cmt. (n.1(A)) (prohibiting reduction where “amendment does not have the effect of lowering the defendant’s applicable guideline range because of the operation of another guideline”); Moore, 541 F.3d at 1330 (<HOLDING>). Additionally, Gibson’s Booker and Kimbrough

A: holding that the district court lacked authority under  3582c2 to grant a sentencing reduction to defendants who were career offenders sentenced under ussg  4b11 because amendment 706 would not ultimately affect their guideline ranges
B: holding that amendment 706 would not affect the guideline ranges for career offenders sentenced under  4b11
C: holding that a defendant whose sentence is based on his status as a career offender under  4b11 is not entitled to  3582c2 relief because amendments 706 and 713 do not lower the applicable guideline range for a career offender
D: holding that a district court lacks authority under  3582c2 to reduce a defendants sentence when the defendant was sentenced under  4b11 as a career offender
D.