Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider replacing `kubectl port-forward` with `juju expose` #3

Open
relaxdiego opened this issue Mar 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Consider replacing `kubectl port-forward` with `juju expose` #3

relaxdiego opened this issue Mar 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Projects

Comments

@relaxdiego
Copy link
Owner

@relaxdiego relaxdiego commented Mar 10, 2020

From this discourse comment

The kubectl ... port-forward is also interesting, as I would have thought that juju expose grafana would be the way to interact with it. Certainly a goal would be to not have to know the exact ports that the charm uses, but have things like juju expose to do the work for you. Also hopefully expose would mean that you don’t have to rerun the command when a new unit comes up.

@relaxdiego relaxdiego added this to To do in v0.1.0 Mar 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
v0.1.0
  
To do
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant
You can’t perform that action at this time.