Drop S3 Website option#1554
Merged
JonnyBurger merged 2 commits intoDec 9, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Member
|
Thanks a lot! This is very embarassing, I simply was not aware that we are not using the S3 website. I also had no idea that the website feature was this cursed that endpoint is sometimes with a |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The S3 Website option is not needed and is not really used since the default S3 endpoint (not the S3 Website endpoint) is being used everywhere. Also, the S3 Website endpoint does not support HTTPS protocol which is now required for the proxy to work on lambda due to the Private Network Access.