Alternative libraries to request

[reconbot]

Since the announcement of request going into "maintenance mode" (full details in #3142) I'd like to collect a list of alternative libraries to use. Please comment below and I'll update this table. When we have a list of good alternatives we should add this to the readme.

In no particular order and dreadfully incomplete;

Package Name	Bundle Size	API Style	Summary
node-fetch	0.4kb	promise / stream	A light-weight module that brings window.fetch to Node.js
bent	1kb	fp / promise / stream	Functional HTTP client w/ async/await
got	48.4kb	promise / stream	Simplified HTTP requests
make-fetch-happen	442kb	promise / stream	make-fetch-happen is a Node.js library that wraps node-fetch-npm with additional features node-fetch doesn't intend to include, including HTTP Cache support, request pooling, proxies, retries, and more!
axios	11.9kb	promise / stream	Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js
unfetch	1kb	promise / stream	Tiny 500b fetch "barely-polyfill"
superagent	18kb	chaining / promise	Small progressive client-side HTTP request library, and Node.js module with the same API, sporting many high-level HTTP client features
tiny-json-http	22kb	promise	Minimalist HTTP client for GET and POSTing JSON payloads
needle	164kb	chaining / promise	The leanest and most handsome HTTP client in the Nodelands
urllib	816kb	callback / promise	Help in opening URLs (mostly HTTP) in a complex world — basic and digest authentication, redirections, cookies and more.

[jeffscottward]

As a frontend focused guy who also does node.js from time to time, axios has been my go to.
Easy API, from Facebook, works on browsers and node? Done

[bnb]

Per a recent discussion with @mikeal, I have Bent a try. As a Node.js developer whose been using request for a while now, bent was definitely an easy transition - highly recommended 💖

[paambaati]

@reconbot You might want to add got, needle and urllib.

[simov]

Well, it feels kind of wrong to promote my own little library here, but since that's the goal of the issue, here it is: request-compose is a functional, 0 deps HTTP client with support for promises, streams, and a bunch of other useful options, most of which are very close to the ones found in request.

I also wrote an article about it. The general idea is that everyone is encouraged to compose their own HTTP clients, specifically tailored to their own needs.

As for the bundle size, I've no idea, but it should be pretty small, though this client was never designed to be used in the browser.

[csantanapr]

It might be good to add the following columns to the table:

• Number of stars in Github (yes I already know this is not the only factor when choosing a lib)
• Number of npm downloads (maybe weekly, same stat as npm website, and yes I already know this is not the only factor when choosing a lib)

When putting side by side these numbers some libs have thousands of stars and million of downloads weekly, vs others in the hundreds.

My 2 cents, OK to ignore and move on, no need to correct or dispute the comment.

[reconbot]

@csantanapr I agree, it might be worth comparing feature sets too. Proxy support, cache support, auth features etc. If you use a specific feature of request and need to find it elsewhere, this would be a good time to talk about it.

[kreig303]

axios gets my vote, especially as a front-ender.

[JamesMGreene]

Worth a look: ky (frontend) and ky-universal (isomorphic)

[rmngrc]

Axios user here. That way, all our teams can use the same library regardless the environment: browser or nodejs (running in server or serverless). Very well maintained, and all our people love it.

[sindresorhus]

We have a good comparison between got, request, node-fetch, axios, and superagent in the got readme: https://github.com/sindresorhus/got#comparison
(PR welcome if you see any inaccuracies. We've tried to keep it as neutral as possible)

Got also has a migration guide for moving from request: https://github.com/sindresorhus/got/blob/master/migration-guides.md

[tracker1]

For me, I tend to do wrappers around fetch api, so node-fetch is my goto. Despite the negative aspects, I usually load it onto global.fetch in node, so I can rely on it always being available, much like in the browser (via polyfill for older browsers). Can also use isomorphic-fetch which is pretty much a wrapper around node-fetch for node, and the fetch polyfill (or already available fetch) in browser. Since I don't have to support legacy browsers, I just use the global, and establish the global for use in node.

[vdeturckheim]

Hey, Wreck (https://www.npmjs.com/package/wreck) is what I use

[Velveeta]

I would prefer something that mimics the fetch api on the client. Libs like axios, superagent, etc are higher level abstractions on top of a standard request library. As a replacement for the low-level request library, I'd like to see something that mirrors the low-level equivalent on the client for the purposes of universal js development. Libs like axios and superagent can then just reimplement themselves on top of that, and its users can continue using them, but those shouldn't be considered foundational for this purpose.

[kreig303]

@Velveeta I went and looked at the axios codebase and see no evidence that it is based on a "lower-level standard request library". Please tell me how you came to this conclusion?

[reconbot]

@sindresorhus's comparison is by far the better approach than my list above. https://github.com/sindresorhus/got#comparison

node-fetch/isomorphic-fetch is a suitable low level building block for most clients. I'd love to see a fetch based request shim.

[simov]

I would wrap fetch with nicer API any day. Well, I guess that's just a matter of preference, but implying that the fetch API is great just because it's a defacto standard in the browsers is just wrong. I know it's less noise to have it isomorphic on both sides, but that don't make it any better.

[dar5hak]

There's r2 by @mikeal himself. It is meant to be a spiritual successor to request. It has a Promise API and is 16kb compressed.

[ofrobots]

Axios may work okay in the browser, but that hasn't been our experience with it on Node.js. Also, I am not sure if it is actively maintained anymore.

[Velveeta]

@kreig303 I haven't looked into the internals of axios, so I wasn't aware of that. Looks like it's currently based on regular XHR's, which makes sense, since it's a solution for both client and server requests. I simply meant that axios is pretty feature rich, and something a little more bare bones should be considered for a foundational module like a replacement for request, and then let other more feature rich libs build on top of that if they desire. I opted for something that mirrors the fetch API specifically for the purposes of having a consistent API on both client and server (like the XHR's that underly axios), and because it's the logical successor to XHR's. If a nicer API wrapper is desired, there's plenty of opportunity to wrap it and release another library with that optimal API, but I'm all for feature and API parity between client and server wherever it can be done.

[simov]

Well, one of the issues we have in request is too many features, and too much exposed state, even the one that's considered internal. It's both a curse and a bless to have so many features. It's a bless because that's why it is so popular, and it was first. It's a curse because without a huge amount of constant effort to keep the codebase clean, straightforward, and generally exciting to work with, the project eventually dies. And that's not even a request's problem, it's the user's own perspective of always wanting to put something out of their own layer, and instead put it under the blanket somewhere else.

Well, I guess axios have the same faith ..

So what we can all do instead, is put at least some amount of effort into understanding how the wheel works, and then try to think through each individual task at hand, and see which wheel fits best.

[kreig303]

@ofrobots that's a bit of a selective screenshot for such a popularly used library. Here's mine:

FWIW I don't recall if I'd used it as a back-end lib, so I am in no position to verify your claims (unless you had a peculiar use case it didn't cover).

[dgrelaud]

If you need an ultra small & ultra fast NodeJS request library (< 150 LOC, no dependencies), focused on simple and reliable retries (even with streams), with many features (gzip/deflate/brotli response follow redirect, instance, ...). Here is our modest contribution:

https://github.com/carboneio/rock-req

Library	NodeJS 16	NodeJS 18	NodeJS 20*	Size deps inc.
rock-req 🙋‍♂️	22816 req/s	21797 req/s	21964 req/s	144 LOC
simple-get	2937 req/s	3260 req/s	21258 req/s	317 LOC
axios	5090 req/s	4910 req/s	3196 req/s	13983 LOC
got	2163 req/s	1762 req/s	9961 req/s	9227 LOC
fetch	2101 req/s	2102 req/s	2020 req/s	13334 LOC
request	2249 req/s	1869 req/s	15815 req/s	46572 LOC
superagent	2776 req/s	2100 req/s	2895 req/s	16109 LOC
phin	3178 req/s	1164 req/s	21299 req/s	331 LOC
undici*	24095 req/s	24378 req/s	24191 req/s	16225 LOC

It is written in pure JS for performance.

[krylov-krylov]

Sanyakry