Skip to content

Conversation

@jayvdb
Copy link
Contributor

@jayvdb jayvdb commented Jan 29, 2015

This fails due to issue #164, but I'll refresh it after that has landed and addressing any code review

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 85.79% when pulling c0a5901 on jayvdb:travis-setup.py into 50e8529 on requests:master.

@jayvdb
Copy link
Contributor Author

jayvdb commented Jan 29, 2015

Log of both patches together, showing all tests passing and skipping correctly
https://travis-ci.org/jayvdb/requests-oauthlib/builds/48734306

@jayvdb
Copy link
Contributor Author

jayvdb commented Sep 23, 2015

Depends on #196

@singingwolfboy
Copy link
Member

Hi @jayvdb, is this pull request still relevant? If so, could you please rebase it so it can be reviewed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants