New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Are you on a fork of Resque? I'd like to get you back on releases #1372
Comments
|
@rbroemeling sent in PR #1371 |
|
Fixing #1074 is important. |
|
@dylanahsmith mentioned that Shopify is interested, and that @fw42 might be helping figure it out. |
|
#552 is at least one thing @github would need to get back on mainline, but it's a biggie. I'd still like to make it happen, though it might take till a 1.27.0 /cc @technoweenie |
|
Just out of curiosity: Why are you going back to 1.x instead of continuing work on 2.x? What's wrong with 2.x? |
|
i mentioned to @technoweenie that I am interested in helping with resque |
|
@fw42 I blogged about it http://words.steveklabnik.com/rescuing-resque-again TL;DR: contributions have basically dropped off, I don't want to abandon users with back-incompat changes, and generally think that incremental improvement is better than trying to do a re-write these days. @arthurnn that would be fantastic! Maybe a good first step is figuring out what @github needs here? |
|
Okay! I think that this is about all the response we're gonna get on this issue. I am still quite interested in this overall, and we've integrated a lot of Shopify's changes. Thanks everyone! And to future googlers, I am still interested in making this happen if you're on a fork. |
Hey there! So Resque hasn't gotten any updates in a long time, but I've been doing some work, trying to get ready for
1.26.0.One thing that I would like to do is get people who are on forks back to master. Said forks are my fault for stepping away from Resque😭
If you're one of those people, would you mind leaving a comment with
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: