Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Are you on a fork of Resque? I'd like to get you back on releases #1372

Closed
steveklabnik opened this issue Jan 11, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed
Milestone

Comments

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Hey there! So Resque hasn't gotten any updates in a long time, but I've been doing some work, trying to get ready for 1.26.0.

One thing that I would like to do is get people who are on forks back to master. Said forks are my fault for stepping away from Resque 😭

If you're one of those people, would you mind leaving a comment with

  1. what stuff you've fixed in forks
  2. if you're interested in moving those patches upstream
  3. any other bugs that you consider high-priority.

Thanks!

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@rbroemeling sent in PR #1371

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

Fixing #1074 is important.

@steveklabnik steveklabnik added this to the 1.26.0 milestone Jan 11, 2016
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@dylanahsmith mentioned that Shopify is interested, and that @fw42 might be helping figure it out.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

#552 is at least one thing @github would need to get back on mainline, but it's a biggie. I'd still like to make it happen, though it might take till a 1.27.0 /cc @technoweenie

@fw42
Copy link
Member

fw42 commented Jan 13, 2016

Just out of curiosity: Why are you going back to 1.x instead of continuing work on 2.x? What's wrong with 2.x?

@arthurnn
Copy link

i mentioned to @technoweenie that I am interested in helping with resque

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@fw42 I blogged about it http://words.steveklabnik.com/rescuing-resque-again

TL;DR: contributions have basically dropped off, I don't want to abandon users with back-incompat changes, and generally think that incremental improvement is better than trying to do a re-write these days.

@arthurnn that would be fantastic! Maybe a good first step is figuring out what @github needs here?

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

Okay! I think that this is about all the response we're gonna get on this issue. I am still quite interested in this overall, and we've integrated a lot of Shopify's changes. 👍

Thanks everyone! And to future googlers, I am still interested in making this happen if you're on a fork. 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants