Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Database tools should be indistinguishable from magic #1000

Closed
coffeemug opened this issue Jun 13, 2013 · 27 comments
Closed

Database tools should be indistinguishable from magic #1000

coffeemug opened this issue Jun 13, 2013 · 27 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@coffeemug
Copy link
Contributor

Surprise and amaze people with developer tools for building real-time, data-driven web applications they could only dream of building, and bring sheer joy and simplicity to the process of building great software.

@mlucy
Copy link
Member

mlucy commented Jun 13, 2013

Moving into 1.7.

@ghost ghost assigned Tryneus Jun 13, 2013
@mlucy
Copy link
Member

mlucy commented Jun 13, 2013

@Tryneus, do you think you'll have time to pick this one up?

@mglukhovsky
Copy link
Member

@mlucy, your wit knows no bounds. 😃

@Tryneus
Copy link
Member

Tryneus commented Jun 13, 2013

Working on this now.

@neumino
Copy link
Member

neumino commented Jun 13, 2013

Moving to 1.6.1.

@srh
Copy link
Contributor

srh commented Jun 14, 2013

Surprise and amaze people with developer tools for building real-time, data-driven web applications they could only dream of building, and bring sheer joy and simplicity to the process of building great software.

This has nothing to do with magic.

@coffeemug
Copy link
Contributor Author

This has nothing to do with magic.

I disagree, for two reasons:

  1. Magic tends to surprise and amaze people.
  2. Building good software is painful and hard. Making it pleasant and simple is a fairly magical thing to do.

@mlucy
Copy link
Member

mlucy commented Jun 14, 2013

Do we have the budget to hire some wicca?

@Tryneus
Copy link
Member

Tryneus commented Jun 21, 2013

No progress on this yet, guys, been working on other issues. I'll get to this as soon as I can.

@coffeemug
Copy link
Contributor Author

Backlog, then.

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

Almost forgot about this. We should ship it with 2.0.

@coffeemug
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we might want to punt it the raft milestone, but I'm not sure 😄

@Tryneus
Copy link
Member

Tryneus commented Mar 27, 2015

I'll get to this when I'm back from vacation (should be around August).

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

@coffeemug Yes I was considering that too. I think we might have to split this issue up. I'm pretty sure we should be shipping at least some of the magic with 2.0.

@gchpaco
Copy link
Contributor

gchpaco commented Mar 27, 2015

That's no good, some of it might escape. You can only enclose it safely if all of the magic is there.

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

Rethinking this I'm not sure how useful a database tool indistinguishable from magic would actually be.

There already is an implementation, and I'm unsure how we could maintain the database aspect once we become indistinguishable.
We could maybe just fork http://www.opencircuitdesign.com/magic/ and relabel it as a database tool?

@deontologician
Copy link
Contributor

Database tool that's indistinguishable from magic is one that isn't real, so the solution is to fork an empty git repo

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

I feel like it isn't entirely clear what we should actually do here for some reason.

I was originally going by @coffeemug 's original description

Surprise and amaze people with developer tools for building real-time, data-driven web applications they could only dream of building, and bring sheer joy and simplicity to the process of building great software.

This I think we will get done for 2.0.

However it's also clear that there's more to this.
I think in the long term we'll have to do all of these things:

  • Having nothing to do with magic
  • Hire some wicca
  • Ship it with 2.0
  • Put it in the raft milestone
  • Split it up
  • Enclose it safely by having all the magic there
  • Fork an empty git repo

I'll probably open separate issues for these items at some point.

@v3ss0n
Copy link

v3ss0n commented Mar 28, 2015

Magic Shrooms are Strong with this team...

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Josh Kuhn notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: dead horse]
https://camo.githubusercontent.com/e073932605bba77d958e52ad96ae8910035db6d2/687474703a2f2f69332e6b796d2d63646e2e636f6d2f70686f746f732f696d616765732f6e657773666565642f3030302f3534302f3636322f3734382e676966


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1000 (comment)
.

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

RethinkDB 2.0 ships with a good amount of magic out of the box. We'll add some more in the upcoming releases to fully achieve this goal.

@danielmewes danielmewes modified the milestones: subsequent, 2.0 Apr 14, 2015
@v3ss0n
Copy link

v3ss0n commented Apr 15, 2015

How about hiring David Copperfield , or Dynamo :P

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

@v3ss0n will keep that option in mind. :)

@danielmewes danielmewes modified the milestones: 2.1, subsequent Jul 30, 2015
@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

I think this deserves some serious consideration for 2.1.

@v3ss0n
Copy link

v3ss0n commented Aug 1, 2015

Yes Please!! And please live stream it for those who can't come to States :D

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

The magic is being packed up right now.

@v3ss0n
Copy link

v3ss0n commented Aug 11, 2015

This bag of magic shouldn't be closed! keep it open!!

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

@v3ss0n don't worry, this is just for transfer. It's easy to unpack again once we've distributed the packages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants