You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This way these frameworks can be used else where and will get contributions separately. Also parts of the the architecture and design decisions gets validated and scrutinised better. Also this will limit ad hoc workarounds.
I am not familiar with the internals but ideas of core libs that can be present:
coroutine / threading
networking / RCP
distributed consensus
futures / reactive programming
storage engine
query planning
etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Your ideas seem good but they aren't easily actionable and the motivations you give are too general. I recommend posting these ideas on our mailing list instead, or discussing them over slack.
Feature requests are a lot more helpful if they are more focused, if they provided more concrete motivations and benefits.
Is it possible to factor out the internal core technologies used like in projects like:
This way these frameworks can be used else where and will get contributions separately. Also parts of the the architecture and design decisions gets validated and scrutinised better. Also this will limit ad hoc workarounds.
I am not familiar with the internals but ideas of core libs that can be present:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: