New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

http/2 support planned? #28

Closed
m0yellow opened this Issue Mar 20, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@m0yellow

m0yellow commented Mar 20, 2015

Is support for http/2 planned for httpd? The adoption with browsers seem to be rather quick, so there could be a fast transition to leave HTTP/1.1 as legacy soon.

@reyk reyk added the featuritis label May 19, 2015

@reyk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@reyk

reyk May 19, 2015

Owner

I'm not convinced about HTTP/2 yet. But I'll keep it in mind for reference.

Owner

reyk commented May 19, 2015

I'm not convinced about HTTP/2 yet. But I'll keep it in mind for reference.

@reyk reyk closed this May 19, 2015

@Brahmasmi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Brahmasmi

Brahmasmi Sep 8, 2017

As per http://caniuse.com/http2, there are upwards of three quarters of browser user agents that now support HTTP 2.0.

I understand that there is a reluctance to introduce features for the sake of it, and hence the featuritis tag.

However, as and when you are convinced that httpd should now support HTTP 2.0, would you please consider reopening this issue? It would help a lot.

Thanks.

Brahmasmi commented Sep 8, 2017

As per http://caniuse.com/http2, there are upwards of three quarters of browser user agents that now support HTTP 2.0.

I understand that there is a reluctance to introduce features for the sake of it, and hence the featuritis tag.

However, as and when you are convinced that httpd should now support HTTP 2.0, would you please consider reopening this issue? It would help a lot.

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment